Gastrointestinal Conditions: Acute Infectious Gastroenteritis and Colitis.

Gastroenteritis is inflammation of the stomach and intestines; colitis is inflammation of the colon. Viruses are the most common cause, followed by bacteria and parasites. Incidence of the various infections varies by age, sex, location, and vaccine availability; vaccination has reduced rotavirus infections by as much as 90% in children. Postinfectious complications include irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and lactose intolerance. Approximately 9% of patients with acute gastroenteritis or colitis develop postinfectious IBS, which accounts for more than 50% of all IBS cases. The diagnostic approach to gastroenteritis and colitis varies with symptom severity. Microbial studies are not needed with mild symptoms that resolve within a week, but longer-lasting or more severe symptoms (including bloody stool) warrant microbial studies. In addition, recent antibiotic exposure should prompt testing for Clostridioides difficile. Multiplex antimicrobial testing is preferred; stool cultures and microscopic stool examinations are no longer first-line tests. Management depends on severity. Patients with mild or moderate symptoms are treated with oral hydration if tolerated; nasogastric or intravenous hydration are used for those with more severe illness. In addition, antiemetic, antimotility, and/or antisecretory drugs can be used for symptom control. Antimicrobial therapy is indicated for C difficile infections, travel-related diarrhea, other bacterial infections with severe symptoms, and parasitic infections.

Evaluation of different genomic regions of rotavirus B and rotavirus C for development of real-time RT‒PCR assays.

BACKGROUND: The causative agents of diarrhea, rotavirus B (RVB) and rotavirus C (RVC) are common in adults and patients of all age groups, respectively. Due to the Rotavirus A (RVA) vaccination program, a significant decrease in the number of gastroenteritis cases has been observed globally. The replacement of RVA infections with RVB, RVC, or other related serogroups is suspected due to the possibility of reducing natural selective constraints due to RVA infections. The data available on RVB and RVC incidence are scant due to the lack of cheap and rapid commercial diagnostic assays and the focus on RVA infections. The present study aimed to develop real-time RT‒PCR assays using the data from all genomic RNA segments of human RVB and RVC strains available in the Gene Bank. RESULTS: Among the 11 gene segments, NSP3 and NSP5 of RVB and the VP6 gene of RVC were found to be suitable for real-time RT‒PCR (qRT‒PCR) assays. Fecal specimens collected from diarrheal patients were tested simultaneously for the presence of RVB (n = 192) and RVC (n = 188) using the respective conventional RT‒PCR and newly developed qRT‒PCR assays. All RVB- and RVC-positive specimens were reactive in their respective qRT‒PCR assays and had Ct values ranging between 23.69 and 41.97 and 11.49 and 36.05, respectively. All known positive and negative specimens for other viral agents were nonreactive, and comparative analysis showed 100% concordance with conventional RT‒PCR assays. CONCLUSIONS: The suitability of the NSP5 gene of RVB and the VP6 gene of RVC was verified via qRT‒PCR assays, which showed 100% sensitivity and specificity. The rapid qRT‒PCR assays developed will be useful diagnostic tools, especially during diarrheal outbreaks for testing non-RVA rotaviral agents and reducing the unnecessary use of antibiotics.

Comparative evaluation of two molecular multiplex syndromic panels with acute gastroenteritis.

We compared the Allplex Gastrointestinal V/B1/B2 Assays and Seeplex Diarrhea V/B1/B2 ACE Detection Assays in patients with acute gastroenteritis (AGE). Of the total 432 specimens, 48.8% and 54.9% samples were positive for any bacterial or viral target using Seeplex and Allplex, respectively (P = 0.002). The overall percent agreement (OPA) between the two panels was >95% and the lowest OPA was 95.4% for CdB. Allplex identified 40 samples positive for Salmonella spp., while Seeplex and OBC identified only 27 (67.5%) and 8 (20%), respectively. Shigella spp. were detected by assays in six samples, but none were identified using culture. Clostridium perfringens with Seeplex was detected in 70 (16.2%). It remained an informative species in identifying AGE although cpe gene showed only 9.8% positivity. Pathogenic Escherichia coli with Allplex could be detected in 40 (9.3%) samples, which could provide valuable information for the diagnosis of AGE.

Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disease.

This JAMA Insights Clinical Update discusses the symptoms, diagnosis, and management of eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases.

Gastrointestinal PCR panel results and antibiotic use in acute gastroenteritis cases: How appropriate are we in our usage?

BACKGROUND: We aimed to determine the pathogens detected by the Gastrointestinal (GI) PCR panel in patients with acute gastroenteritis (AGE), the evaluation of antibiotic use in these patients, and the investigation of the role of laboratory parameters in differentiating viral and bacterial etiologies. METHODS: The demographic characteristics, GI PCR panel results, laboratory investigations, antibiotic usage, and appropriateness of antibiotic treatment were investigated in AGE patients. RESULTS: A total of 175 adult patients with AGE and GI PCR panel results were included in the study. The most common pathogens were EPEC (24.6%) and C. difficile (18.3%). Among the 102 patients receiving antibiotic treatment, 34.3% were evaluated as inappropriate antibiotic use. WBC, CRP, procalcitonin, CRP/albumin ratio, and procalcitonin/albumin ratio were found to be significantly higher in cases with bacterial origin. CONCLUSIONS: The utilization of GI PCR panels in AGE patients has revolutionized the field of diagnostics by providing rapid and accurate identification of pathogens. In units without the possibility of GI PCR testing, CRP, procalcitonin, CRP/albumin ratio and procalcitonin/albumin ratio may be useful in the decision of antibiotic treatment.

Comparative evaluation of the detection rate, workflow and associated costs of a multiplex PCR panel versus conventional methods in diagnosis of infectious gastroenteritis.

Introduction. Infectious gastroenteritis is a common reason for consulting a physician. Although most cases of gastrointestinal illness are self-limiting, the identification of the etiologic pathogen by stool specimen analysis is important in cases of more severe illness and for epidemiological reasons.Due to the broad range of causative pathogens, the conventional examination of a stool specimen is labour-intensive and usually requires different diagnostic methods. Multiplex PCR tests [e.g. BioFire Gastrointestinal (GI) Panel] allow the rapid detecting of up to 22 pathogens in one test.Hypothesis. Using a multiplex PCR panel to test stool specimens for infectious gastroenteritis pathogens can improve the detection rate, reduce the time-to-result and hands-on time and lower the costs of a microbiology laboratory.Aim. This study was aimed at evaluating the detection rate, the workflow and associated costs of stool specimen management using the BioFire GI Panel versus conventional methods.Methodology. Stool specimens were evaluated prospectively during the routine operation. Pathogen detection rate, hands-on time, time-to-result and material and personnel costs were determined for the BioFire GI Panel and conventional methods-the latter based on physician request and excluding viral testing.Results. Analysing 333 specimens collected between 2019 and 2020, the detection rate of enteropathogens was significantly higher with a positivity rate of 39.9 % using the multiplex PCR panel compared with 15.0 % using the conventional methods. The BioFire GI Panel presented results in a median time of 2.2 h compared with 77.5 h for culture and 22.1 h for antigen testing, noting that no tests were performed at weekends except for toxinogenic Clostridioides difficile. Based on list prices, the BioFire GI Panel was nine times more expensive compared with conventional methods, whereas hands-on-time was significantly lower using the BioFire GI Panel.Conclusion. Multiplex PCR panels are valuable tools for laboratory identification of infectious agents causing diarrhoea. The higher costs of such a multiplex PCR panel might be outweighed by the higher detection rate, ease of handling, rapid results and most likely improved patient management. However, these panels do not provide information on antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Therefore, if this is necessary for targeted therapy or if outbreak monitoring and control is required, specimens must still be cultured.

Multicenter evaluation of BioCode GPP for syndromic molecular detection of gastrointestinal pathogens from stool specimens.

Acute gastroenteritis (AGE) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide across all age groups that disproportionally affects young children in low- and middle-income countries and immunocompromised patients in high-income countries. Regional outbreaks of AGE are typically detected by traditional microbiological detection methods that target limited organisms and are associated with low sensitivity and lengthy time-to-results. Combined, these may result in repeat testing, imprecise or delayed treatment, and delayed recognition of outbreaks. We conducted a multi-site prospective study comparing the BioCode Gastrointestinal Pathogen Panel (BioCode GPP) for the detection of 17 common bacterial, viral, and protozoan causes of gastroenteritis with reference methods, including stool culture, enzyme immunoassays, pathogen-specific PCR assays, and sequencing. One thousand five hundred fifty-eight residual, de-identified stool samples (unpreserved stool and stool in Cary-Blair transport medium) were enrolled and tested for 11 bacterial, 3 viral, and 3 protozoan pathogens. BioCode GPP and reference methods were positive for 392 (25.2%) and 283 (18.2%) samples, respectively (P < 0.0001). In this study, the BioCode GPP and reference methods detected 69 and 65 specimens positive for Clostridioides difficile, 51 and 48 for enteroaggregative Escherichia coli, 33 and 27 for enterotoxigenic E. coli, 50 and 47 for norovirus GI/GII, and 30 and 22 for rotavirus A, respectively. The BioCode GPP showed good positive and negative agreements for each pathogen ranging from 89.5% to 100%, with overall sensitivity and specificity of 96.1% and 99.7%, post adjudication. The BioCode GPP detected >1 pathogens in 49 samples, representing 12.5% of the total 392 positive specimens. IMPORTANCE: This study highlights performance of a novel technology for timely and accurate detection and differentiation of 17 common bacterial, viral, and protozoan causes of gastroenteritis. Utilizing molecular tests such as the BioCode Gastrointestinal Pathogen Panel may improve the detection of gastrointestinal pathogens and provide actionable results, particularly for patient populations at most risk.

Enhancing enteric pathogen detection: implementation and impact of multiplex PCR for improved diagnosis and surveillance.

BACKGROUND: Syndromic surveillance of acute gastroenteritis plays a significant role in the diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal infections that are responsible for a substantial number of deaths globally, especially in developing countries. In Lebanon, there is a lack of national surveillance for acute gastroenteritis, and limited data exists regarding the prevalence of pathogens causing diarrhea. The one-year study aims to investigate the epidemiology of common gastrointestinal pathogens and compare our findings with causative agents of diarrhea reported by our study collaborative centers. METHODS: A multicenter, cross-sectional study was conducted over a one-year period. A total of 271 samples were obtained from outpatients and inpatients presenting with symptoms of acute gastroenteritis at various healthcare facilities. The samples were then analyzed using Allplex gastrointestinal assay that identifies a panel of enteric pathogens. RESULTS: Overall, enteropathogens were detected in 71% of the enrolled cases, 46% of those were identified in patients as single and 54% as mixed infections. Bacteria were observed in 48%, parasites in 12% and viruses in 11%. Bacterial infections were the most prevalent in all age groups. Enteroaggregative E. coli (26.5%), Enterotoxigenic E. coli (23.2%) and Enteropathogenic E. coli (20.3%) were the most frequently identified followed by Blastocystis hominis (15.5%) and Rotavirus (7.7%). Highest hospitalization rate occurred with rotavirus (63%), Enterotoxigenic E. coli (50%), Blastocystis hominis (45%) and Enteropathogenic E. coli (43%). Enteric pathogens were prevalent during summer, fall and winter seasons. CONCLUSIONS: The adoption of multiplex real-time PCR assays in the diagnosis of gastrointestinal infections has identified gaps and improved the rates of detection for multiple pathogens. Our findings highlight the importance of conducting comprehensive surveillance to monitor enteric infections. The implementation of a syndromic testing panel can therefore provide healthcare professionals with timely and accurate information for more effective treatment and public health interventions.

Prevalence of astrovirus and sapovirus among adult oncology patients with acute gastroenteritis using a multiplexed gastrointestinal pathogen PCR panel.

BACKGROUND: Multiplex syndromic gastrointestinal panels (GIPCR) have streamlined the diagnosis of infectious diarrhea. Additionally, they have expanded the number of pathogens that can be routinely evaluated, allowing further understanding of the prevalence of enteric pathogens in various patient populations. The goal of this study was to investigate the prevalence and clinical presentation of astrovirus and sapovirus gastroenteritis in adult oncology patients as detected by the FilmArray GIPCR. METHODS: All GIPCR panel results from December 2017 to June 2021 were retrospectively reviewed to determine the prevalence of astrovirus and sapovirus in adult oncology patients. Medical records were also reviewed to obtain clinical information. Repeat GIPCR positivity and symptom duration were used to estimate prolonged viral shedding. RESULTS: A total of 18,014 panels were performed on samples collected from 9303 adults. Overall, astrovirus and sapovirus were detected in 0.35% (33/9303) and 0.45% (42/9303) GIPCRs respectively. At least one viral target was detected in 424 (4.4%) patients. Astrovirus accounted for 7.8% (33/424) and sapovirus 9.9% (42/424) of patients. Diarrhea was the most common symptom documented. A subset of transplant patients had protracted viral detection with a median of ~27 days (range 23-43 days) for astrovirus and 97 days (range 11-495) for sapovirus. No clusters or outbreaks were identified during the study period. CONCLUSION: In oncology patients with viral gastroenteritis, astrovirus and sapovirus were the causative agents in 18% of the cases. Both viruses were associated with mild disease. Prolonged diarrhea and viral shedding were observed in a few transplant patients.

The effect of the transition to molecular diagnosis on the epidemiology and the clinical characteristics of bacterial gastroenteritis in Northern Israel.

BACKGROUND: The transition to PCR-based diagnosis of bacterial gastroenteritis (BGE) can increase the sensitivity but might reduce the clinical specificity. The aims of this study were (1) to compare the effect of the change from culture to PCR-based diagnostics on the reported incidence and positivity rates of BGE due to Salmonella, Shigella and Campylobacter species and (2) to compare the demographics, medical background, clinical characteristics and pre-analytic variables between cases with PCR-positive, culture-negative samples to cases with PCR-positive, culture-positive samples. METHODS: The study was performed at the Emek Medical Centre that serves a population of 0.5 million people in Northern Israel. The study included two parts: (1) a retrospective cohort study, comparing the incidence and positivity rates of laboratory-diagnosed BGE from January 2016 until December 22nd, 2019 when culture was the sole method to January 2020 until April 2023 when PCR was used; (2) a prospective cohort study, conducted between November 2020 until April 2023 that compared the demographics and clinical characteristics of BGE cases that were diagnosed by PCR alone versus cases that were diagnosed by both PCR and culture. RESULTS: The incidence rate between-periods comparability ratio was only 113% since the incidence rate did not increase during 2020, the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. The sample positivity rate increased since 2020, with between-periods comparability ratio of 159%. In the second period, the sample positivity rates of culture vs. PCR alone differed between the pathogens and were 90.2%, 63.8% and 54.2% for Salmonella, Campylobacter and Shigella species, respectively (p < 0.001). The following variables were identified as independent predictors of culture positivity: (1) Salmonella infection (O.R. = 10.6, 95% C.I. 3.6-31.1, p < 0.001); (2) Shigella infection (O.R. = 0.46, 95% C.I.0.23-0.93, p = 0.032); (3) time from sample submission to culture (O.R.=0.73, 95% C.I. 0.58-0.92, p = 0.008); (4) the presence of abdominal pain (O.R. = 1.98, 95% C.I. 1.04-3.79, p = 0.038) and the PCR mean Ct value (O.R. = 0.89, 95% C.I.0.85-0.94, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The use of PCR had led to improved sensitivity, without noticeable decrease in the clinical specificity. This was especially important in the case of the more fastidious organisms.

Enhancing Nursing Care for Children with Acute Gastroenteritis: Integrating Pediatric Early Warning Scores with the Situation-Background-Assessment-Recommendation System.

Background: Acute gastroenteritis is a frequently encountered diarrheal illness in children, often self-limiting but occasionally linked to substantial mortality and morbidity, demanding effective approaches for assessment and intervention. While the utilization of the Pediatric Early Warning Score (PEWS) and the Situation-Background-Assessment-Recommendation system (SBAR) in pediatric patient management is recognized as effective, research in this area remains limited. Objective: Our study aimed to investigate the potential impact of PEWS and SBAR systems on the outcomes of pediatric patients with acute gastroenteritis. Methods: We conducted a randomized controlled trial at our hospital, enrolling 124 children aged 3 to 12 years diagnosed with acute gastroenteritis. These participants were randomly assigned to either a control group (62 cases) or an intervention group (62 cases). Different outcomes were assessed, including the frequency and duration of diarrhea and vomiting, the Modified Vesikari Scale (MVS), the Clinical Dehydration Scale (CDS), and follow-up physician visits. We utilized a two-group independent sample t test to compare outcomes between the two groups. Results: Our study resulted in statistically significant findings favoring the intervention group regarding the frequency and duration of diarrhea and vomiting, the MVS, the CDS, and the need for repeat healthcare visits. Conclusions: The integration of PEWS with SBAR appears to offer improved outcomes for children afflicted with acute gastroenteritis.

Sapovirus infection as another cause of persistent viral diarrhea: case series and review of the literature.

Human sapovirus (HuSaV) is a common cause of gastroenteritis worldwide and is responsible for approximately 4% of acute gastroenteritis episodes in Europe. As reported with norovirus, patients with immunocompromised states are at increased risk of developing HuSaV infection, which can lead to persistent diarrhea and chronic viral shedding in some individuals. Chronic infections are incompletely investigated in these patients, and, due to the lack of specific treatment for HuSaV infection, different clinical approaches were carried out in order to provide further evidence on clinical evolution of these patients with different treatments. In this retrospective study, we report five immunocompromised pediatric patients with recurrent diarrhea caused by HuSaV and long-term viral shedding. Stool samples were analyzed by real-time PCR and tested for enteropathogenic viruses and bacteria and protozoa. Among transplant recipients, reduction of immunosuppressant therapy led to clinical improvement and relief of symptoms, maintaining a balance between managing the infection and preventing graft rejection. Nitazoxanide for 14 days was only used in one of these patients, showing to be an effective therapy to achieve reduction in time to resolution of symptoms. Neither nitazoxanide nor modification of immunosuppressant therapy could avoid recurrences. Further investigations are needed to develop new approaches that can both clear the infection and avoid persistent diarrhea in these patients.

Comparing single versus multiple virus detection in pediatric acute gastroenteritis postimplementation of routine multiplex RT-PCR diagnostic testing.

Utilizing multiplex real time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for rapid diagnosis of gastroenteritis, enables simultaneous detection of multiple pathogens. A comparative analysis of disease characteristics was conducted between cases with single and multiple viruses. Rotavirus vaccine was introduced in 2010, reaching a 70% coverage in 2 years. All rectal swabs collected from diarrheic children (<5 years) between December 2017 and March 2022 were included. Detection of the same viruses within 2 months was considered a single episode. Episodes with positive stool bacterial PCR were excluded. A total of 5879 samples were collected, revealing 86.9% (1509) with single virus detection and 13.1% (227) with multiple viruses. The most frequent combination was rotavirus and norovirus (27.8%), these infections followed a winter-spring seasonality akin to rotavirus. Children with multivirus infections exhibited higher immunodeficiency (OR 2.06) rates, but lower food allergy (OR 0.45) and prematurity rates (OR 0.55) compared to single infections. Greater disease severity, evaluated by the Vesikari score, was observed in multivirus episodes (p < 0.001, OR 1.12). Multivirus infections accounted for 13.1% of symptomatic cases in hospitalized young children. Despite vaccination efforts, rotavirus remained prominent, frequently in co-infections with norovirus. Overall, multivirus infections were linked to more severe diseases than single virus cases.

Clinical Impact of Multiplex Molecular Diagnostic Testing in Children With Acute Gastroenteritis Presenting to an Emergency Department: A Multicenter Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Multiplex molecular diagnostic panels have greatly enhanced detection of gastrointestinal pathogens. However, data on the impact of these tests on clinical and patient-centered outcomes are limited. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, multicenter, stepped-wedge trial to determine the impact of multiplex molecular testing at 5 academic children's hospitals on children presenting to the emergency department with acute gastroenteritis. Caregivers were interviewed on enrollment and 7-10 days after enrollment to determine symptoms, risk factors, subsequent medical visits, and impact on family members. During the pre-intervention period, diagnostic testing was performed at the clinician's discretion . During the intervention period, multiplex molecular testing was performed on all children, with results available to clinicians. The primary outcome was return visits to a healthcare provider within 10 days of enrollment. RESULTS: Potential pathogens were identified by clinician-ordered tests in 19 of 571 (3.3%) in the pre-intervention period compared with 434 of 586 (74%) in the intervention period; clinically relevant pathogens were detected in 2.1% and 15%, respectively. In the multivariate model, the intervention was associated with a 21% reduction in the odds of any return visit (odds ratio, 0.79; 95% confidence interval, .70-.90) after adjusting for potential confounders. Appropriate treatment was prescribed in 11.3% compared with 19.6% during the intervention period (P = .22). CONCLUSIONS: Routine molecular multiplex testing for all children who presented to the ED with acute gastroenteritis detected more clinically relevant pathogens and led to a 21% decrease in return visits. Additional research is needed to define patients most likely to benefit from testing. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT02248285.

Detection and diversity of gastrointestinal viruses in wastewater from Caracas, Venezuela, 2021-2022.

Gastrointestinal viruses (GIV) are an important cause of childhood morbidity and mortality, particularly in developing countries. Their epidemiological impact in Venezuela during the COVID-19 pandemic remains unclear. GIV can also be detected in domestic sewage. Ninety-one wastewater samples from urban areas of Caracas collected over 12 months and concentrated by polyethylene-glycol-precipitation, were analyzed by multiplex reverse-transcription-PCR for rotavirus/calicivirus/astrovirus and enterovirus/klassevirus/cosavirus, and monoplex-PCR for adenovirus and Aichi virus. The overall frequency of virus detection was 46.2%, fluctuating over months, and peaking in the rainy season. Adenoviruses circulated throughout the year, especially type F41, and predominated (52.7%) over caliciviruses (29.1%) that peaked in the rainy months, rotaviruses (9.1%), cosaviruses (5.5%), astroviruses and enteroviruses (1.8%). Aichi-virus and klassevirus were absent. Rotavirus G9/G12, and P[4]/P[8]/P[14] predominated. The occurrence of GIV in wastewater reflects transmission within the population of Caracas and the persistence of a potential public health risk that needs to be adequately monitored.

Evaluating blood culture collection practice in children hospitalized with acute illness at a tertiary hospital in Malawi.

BACKGROUND: Blood culture collection practice in low-resource settings where routine blood culture collection is available has not been previously described. METHODOLOGY: We conducted a secondary descriptive analysis of children aged 2-23 months enrolled in the Malawi Childhood Acute Illness and Nutrition (CHAIN) study, stratified by whether an admission blood culture had been undertaken and by nutritional status. Chi-square test was used to compare the differences between groups. RESULTS: A total of 347 children were included, of whom 161 (46%) had a blood culture collected. Children who had a blood culture collected, compared to those who did not, were more likely to present with sepsis (43% vs. 20%, p < 0.001), gastroenteritis (43% vs. 26%, p < 0.001), fever (86% vs. 73%, p = 0.004), and with poor feeding/weight loss (30% vs. 18%, p = 0.008). In addition, hospital stay in those who had a blood culture was, on average, 2 days longer (p = 0.019). No difference in mortality was observed between those who did and did not have a blood culture obtained. CONCLUSION: Blood culture collection was more frequent in children with sepsis and gastroenteritis, but was not associated with mortality. In low-resource settings, developing criteria for blood culture based on risk factors rather than clinician judgement may better utilize the existing resources.

Blood culture is key to investigating bloodstream infections, but in-hospital decisions to perform blood culture in a low-resource setting have not been previously described. We linked blood culture data to the Childhood Acute Illness and Nutrition (CHAIN) cohort at a Malawi tertiary hospital and compared clinical characteristics and outcomes of children between those who did and did not have a blood culture done on admission. Of those hospitalized, 46% of the children had a blood culture collected at admission. Only 3% of blood cultures had significant growth of pathogenic bacteria. There were significant differences in nutritional status, presenting symptoms, clinical diagnoses and hospital length of stay between those who received blood culture collection on admission and those who did not, but there was no difference in mortality. Clinical judgement used to determine blood culture collection may not best identify children most at risk.

Norovirus-Associated Gastroenteritis Vesikari Score and Pre-Existing Salivary IgA in Young Children from Rural South Africa.

Norovirus (NoV) is the leading cause of viral gastroenteritis, mostly affecting young children worldwide. However, limited data are available to determine the severity of norovirus-associated AGE (acute gastroenteritis) and to correlate it with the NoV-specific IgA antibodies' level. Between October 2019 and September 2021, two hundred stool samples were randomly collected from symptomatic cases for the vesikari score and NoV-specific IgA assessment in young children from rural South Africa. Additionally, one hundred saliva specimens were concomitantly sampled within the same cohort to evaluate the NoV-specific salivary IgA levels. In addition, 50 paired saliva and stool samples were simultaneously collected from asymptomatic children to serve as controls. NoV strains in stool samples were detected using real-time RT-PCR, amplified, and genotyped with RT-PCR and Sanger sequencing. ELISA using NoV VLP (virus-like particles) GII.4 as antigens was performed on the saliva specimens. Dehydrated children were predominantly those with NoV infections (65/74, 88%; p < 0.0001). NoV-positive infections were significantly associated with the severe diarrhea cases having a high vesikari score (55%, 33/60) when compared to the non-severe diarrheal score (29.3%, 41/140; p < 0.0308). NoV of the GII genogroup was mainly detected in severe diarrhea cases (50.9%, 30/59; p = 0.0036). The geometric means of the NoV-specific IgA level were higher in the asymptomatic NoV-infected group (0.286) as compared to the symptomatic group (0.174). This finding suggests that mucosal immunity may not protect the children from the NoV infection. However, the findings indicated the contribution of the pre-existing NoV-specific IgA immune response in reducing the severity of diarrheal disease. A high vesikari score of AGE associated with the NoV GII genogroup circulating in the study area underscores the need for an appropriate treatment of AGE based on the severity level of NoV-associated clinical symptoms in young children.

Disparities in Management of Acute Gastroenteritis in Hospitalized Children.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Acute gastroenteritis (AGE) is a common health care problem accounting for up to 200 000 pediatric hospitalizations annually. Previous studies show disparities in the management of children from different ethnic backgrounds presenting to the emergency department with AGE. Our aim was to evaluate whether differences in medical management also exist between Hispanic and non-Hispanic children hospitalized with AGE. METHODS: We performed a single-center retrospective study of children aged 2 months to 12 years admitted to the pediatric hospital medicine service from January 2016 to December 2020 with a diagnosis of (1) acute gastroenteritis or (2) dehydration with feeding intolerance, vomiting, and/or diarrhea. Differences in clinical pathway use, diagnostic studies performed, and medical interventions ordered were compared between Hispanic and non-Hispanic patients. RESULTS: Of 512 admissions, 54.9% were male, 51.6% were Hispanic, and 59.2% were on Medicaid. There was no difference between Hispanic and non-Hispanic patients in reported nausea or vomiting at admission, pathway use, or laboratory testing including stool studies. However, after adjusting for covariates, Hispanic patients had more ultrasound scans performed (odds ratio 1.65, 95% confidence interval 1.04-2.64) and fewer orders for antiemetics (odds ratio 0.53, 95% CI 0.29-0.95) than non-Hispanic patients. CONCLUSIONS: Although there were no differences in many aspects of AGE management between Hispanic and non-Hispanic patients, there was still variability in ultrasound scans performed and antiemetics ordered, despite similarities in reported abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting. Prospective and/or qualitative studies may be needed to clarify underlying reasons for these differences.

QIAstat-Dx gastrointestinal panel and Luminex xTAG gastrointestinal pathogen panel comparative evaluation.

The diagnosis of acute gastroenteritis is an ongoing clinical challenge in terms of identification of the etiologic agent, time to results, and appropriate treatment. Rapid detection of gastrointestinal pathogens is needed to improve patient care. This study evaluates the performance of the QIAstat-Dx gastrointestinal panel (Q-GP; Investigational Use Only) compared to the Luminex xTAG gastrointestinal pathogen panel (L-GPP; US-IVD). Using 245 stool specimens, we evaluated 10 different targets including rotavirus, norovirus, Salmonella, Shigella, Campylobacter, Giardia, Cryptosporidium, Escherichia coli O157, enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC), and Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC). For the viral targets, the percent positive agreement (PPA) for rotavirus was 100% (n = 19) and that for norovirus was 91% (20/22). For the parasitic targets, the PPA was 100% for Giardia and Cryptosporidium (n = 18 and n = 23, respectively). The PPA was 96% for Salmonella (22/23) and Campylobacter (22/23), and the PPA for Shigella was 100% (n = 23). For the E. coli targets, a PPA of 94% was achieved for STEC (32/34) and 96% for ETEC (24/25). We did not assess PPA for the E. coli O157 target as the Q-GP O157 call is stx dependent. The negative percent agreement across all targets was 99.1%. Our study suggests that QIAstat-Dx GP provides comparable results to Luminex GPP based on the analysis of targets found on both panels.