Case series of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia unfulfilling neurofibromatosis type 1 diagnosis: 21% with somatic NF1 haploinsufficiency in the periosteum.

Up to 84% of patients with congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia (CPT) present with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) (NF1-CPT). However, the etiology of CPT not fulfilling the NIH diagnostic criteria for NF1 (non-NF1-CPT) is not well understood. Here, we collected the periosteum tissue from the pseudarthrosis (PA) site of 43 non-NF1-CPT patients and six patients with NF1-CPT, together with the blood or oral specimen of trios (probands and unaffected parents). Whole-exome plus copy number variation sequencing, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), ultra-high amplicon sequencing, and Sanger sequencing were employed to identify pathogenic variants. The result showed that nine tissues of 43 non-NF1-CPT patients (21%) had somatic mono-allelic NF1 inactivation, and five of six NF1-CPT patients (83.3%) had bi-allelic NF1 inactivation in tissues. However, previous literature involving genetic testing did not reveal somatic mosaicism in non-NF1-CPT patients so far. In NF1-CPT patients, when the results from earlier reports and the present study were combined, 66.7% of them showed somatic NF1 inactivation in PA tissues other than germline inactivation. Furthermore, no diagnostic variants from other known genes (GNAS, AKT1, PDGFRB, and NOTCH3) related to skeletal dysplasia were identified in the nine NF1 positive non-NF1-CPT patients and six NF1-CPT patients. In conclusion, we detected evident somatic mono-allelic NF1 inactivation in the non-NF1-CPT. Thus, for pediatric patients without NF1 diagnosis, somatic mutations in NF1 are important.

Intact procedural learning and motor intracortical inhibition in adult neurofibromatosis type 1 gene carriers.

OBJECTIVE: Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1)1 is known to cause learning deficits in affected individuals. There has been evidence linking altered gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)2 mediated inhibition to learning impairments in rodent models and humans with NF1. Still, evidence on the role of GABA in learning deficits associated with NF1 is inconclusive. METHODS: We examined procedural learning and motor cortex excitability through intracortical facilitation and short interval intracortical inhibition and its activity dependent modulation while performing a procedural sequence learning task in 16 asymptomatic NF1 gene carriers. We aimed to analyze potential brain-behavior correlations in a carefully selected sample of gene carriers in order to minimize confounding factors. RESULTS: Gene carriers did not differ from healthy controls when learning the task with their non-dominant hand over three days of training. Electrophysiological data did not reveal alterations in patients' inhibitory function of the motor cortex. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast with previous publications reporting various cognitive deficits in clinically asymptomatic individuals with NF1, here asymptomatic gene carriers did not show major neuropsychological or behavioral abnormalities. SIGNIFICANCE: Our results support the concept that gene carriers may not always be impaired by the condition and the population of individuals with NF1 most likely comprises different subgroups according to patients' phenotype severity.

Genotype-Phenotype Correlations in Neurofibromatosis and Their Potential Clinical Use.

OBJECTIVE: Because clinically validated biomarkers for neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1) and neurofibromatosis 2 (NF2) have not been identified, we aimed to determine whether genotype-phenotype correlations are useful in clinical trials in NF1 and NF2. METHODS: The Response Evaluation in Neurofibromatosis and Schwannomatosis (REiNS) Biomarker Group first performed a systematic literature search and reviewed existing data on genetic biomarkers in NF1 and NF2 and in in malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. The group then met during a series of consensus meetings to develop a joint report. RESULTS: We found that in NF2, the genetic severity score is clearly of potential clinical use. In NF1, despite over 3,000 constitutional variants having been described in the NF1 gene, only 4 actionable genotype-phenotype correlations exist. The diagnosis and treatment decision of these tumors should ideally include histopathology and compilation of some of the genetic markers. CONCLUSION: We summarized emerging clinical use of genotype-phenotype correlations in neurofibromatosis.

Assessment of nociception and related quality-of-life measures in a porcine model of neurofibromatosis type 1.

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is an autosomal dominant genetic disorder resulting from germline mutations in the NF1 gene, which encodes neurofibromin. Patients experience a variety of symptoms, but pain in the context of NF1 remains largely underrecognized. Here, we characterize nociceptive signaling and pain behaviors in a miniswine harboring a disruptive NF1 mutation (exon 42 deletion). We present the first characterization of pain-related behaviors in a pig model of NF1, identifying unchanged agitation scores, lower tactile thresholds (allodynia), and decreased response latencies to thermal laser stimulation (hyperalgesia) in NF1 (females only) pigs. Male NF1 pigs with tumors showed reduced sleep quality and increased resting, 2 health-related quality-of-life symptoms found to be comorbid in people with NF1 pain. We explore these phenotypes in relationship to suppression of the increased activity of the N-type voltage-gated calcium (CaV2.2) channel by pharmacological antagonism of phosphorylation of a regulatory protein-the collapsin response mediator protein 2 (CRMP2), a known interactor of neurofibromin, and by targeting the interface between the α subunit of CaV2.2 and the accessory ß-subunits with small molecules. Our data support the use of NF1 pigs as a large animal model for studying NF1-associated pain and for understanding the pathophysiology of NF1. Our findings demonstrate the translational potential of 2 small molecules in reversing ion channel remodeling seen in NF1. Interfering with CaV2.2, a clinically validated target for pain management, might also be a promising therapeutic strategy for NF1-related pain management.

CRISPR/Cas9 editing of Nf1 gene identifies CRMP2 as a therapeutic target in neurofibromatosis type 1-related pain that is reversed by (S)-Lacosamide.

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a rare autosomal dominant disease linked to mutations of the Nf1 gene. Patients with NF1 commonly experience severe pain. Studies on mice with Nf1 haploinsufficiency have been instructive in identifying sensitization of ion channels as a possible cause underlying the heightened pain suffered by patients with NF1. However, behavioral assessments of Nf1 mice have led to uncertain conclusions about the potential causal role of Nf1 in pain. We used the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-associated 9 (CRISPR/Cas9) genome editing system to create and mechanistically characterize a novel rat model of NF1-related pain. Targeted intrathecal delivery of guide RNA/Cas9 nuclease plasmid in combination with a cationic polymer was used to generate allele-specific C-terminal truncation of neurofibromin, the protein encoded by the Nf1 gene. Rats with truncation of neurofibromin, showed increases in voltage-gated calcium (specifically N-type or CaV2.2) and voltage-gated sodium (particularly tetrodotoxin-sensitive) currents in dorsal root ganglion neurons. These gains-of-function resulted in increased nociceptor excitability and behavioral hyperalgesia. The cytosolic regulatory protein collapsin response mediator protein 2 (CRMP2) regulates activity of these channels, and also binds to the targeted C-terminus of neurofibromin in a tripartite complex, suggesting a possible mechanism underlying NF1 pain. Prevention of CRMP2 phosphorylation with (S)-lacosamide resulted in normalization of channel current densities, excitability, as well as of hyperalgesia following CRISPR/Cas9 truncation of neurofibromin. These studies reveal the protein partners that drive NF1 pain and suggest that CRMP2 is a key target for therapeutic intervention.

NF1 and Neurofibromin: Emerging Players in the Genetic Landscape of Desmoplastic Melanoma.

Neurofibromatosis type I (NF1), a monogenic disorder with an autosomal dominant mode of inheritance, is caused by alterations in the NF1 gene which codes for the protein neurofibromin. Functionally, NF1 is a tumor suppressor as it is GTPase-activating protein that negatively regulates the MAPK pathway. More recently, much attention has focused on the role of NF1 and neurofibromin in melanoma as mutations in NF1 have been found to constitute 1 of the 4 distinct genomic categories of melanoma, with the other 3 comprising BRAF, NRAS, and "triple-wild-type" subtypes. In this review, we parse the literature on NF1 and neurofibromin with a view to clarifying and gaining a better understanding of their precise role/s in melanomagenesis. We begin with a historic overview, followed by details regarding structure and function and characterization of neural crest development as a model for genetic reversion in neoplasia. Melanogenesis in NF1 sets the stage for the discussion on the roles of NF1 and neurofibromin in neural crest-derived neoplasms including melanoma with particular emphasis on NF1 and neurofibromin as markers of melanocyte dedifferentiation in desmoplastic melanoma.

Actualización del tratamiento de las rasopatías / Update on the treatment of RASopathies

Introducción. El término «rasopatías» agrupa una serie de enfermedades que presentan mutaciones en genes que codifican las proteínas de la vía RAS/MAPK. Estas enfermedades incluyen la neurofibromatosis de tipo 1, el síndrome de Noonan, el síndrome de Legius, el síndrome LEOPARD, el síndrome de Costello y el síndrome cardiofaciocutáneo. La afectación de la vía RAS/MAPK no sólo aumenta la predisposición a desarrollar tumores, sino que también determina la presencia de anomalías fenotípicas y alteraciones en los procesos de aprendizaje. Objetivo. Revisar el papel del uso de estrategias terapéuticas con mecanismos de acción selectivo en las rasopatías. Desarrollo. El hecho de que la vía RAS participe en un tercio de las neoplasias ha motivado el desarrollo y el estudio de distintos fármacos a este nivel. Algunos de estos fármacos han sido probados en las rasopatías, principalmente en la neurofibromatosis de tipo 1. Analizamos el uso de distintos tratamientos antidiana: fármacos que actúan en los receptores de membrana, como los inhibidores de la tirosincinasa, en la vía mTOR o los inhibidores de MEK. Existe un potencial beneficio de estos últimos en estudios recientes realizados en distintas rasopatías. Conclusiones. Actualmente, gracias a los resultados de los primeros trabajos desarrollados con inhibidor de MEK basados principalmente en modelos animales, se están realizando múltiples ensayos clínicos prometedores (AU)

Introduction. The term «RASopathies» covers a series of diseases that present mutations in the genes that code for the proteins of the RAS/MAPK pathway. These diseases include neurofibromatosis type 1, Noonan syndrome, Legius syndrome, LEOPARD syndrome, Costello syndrome and cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome. Involvement of the RAS/MAPK pathway not only increases predisposition to develop tumours, but also determines the presence of phenotypic anomalies and alterations in learning processes. Aim. To review the use of therapeutic strategies with mechanisms that have a selective action on RASopathies. Development. The fact that the RAS pathway is involved in a third of all neoplasms has led to the development and study of different drugs at this level. Some of these pharmaceutical agents have been tested in RASopathies, mainly in neurofibromatosis type 1. Here we analyse the use of different antitarget treatments: drugs that act on the membrane receptors, such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors, in the mTOR pathway or MEK inhibitors. These latter have shown potential benefits in recent studies conducted on different RASopathies. Conclusions. Today, thanks to the results from the first studies conducted with MEK inhibitor based mainly on animal models, a number of promising clinical trials are being carried out (AU)

A novel diagnostic method to detect truncated neurofibromin in neurofibromatosis 1.

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is an autosomal dominant genetic condition caused by dominant loss-of-function mutations of the tumor suppressor gene NF1 that encodes neurofibromin, a negative regulator of RAS activity. Mutation analysis of NF1 located at 17q11.2 has been hampered by the large size of the gene, the high rate of new mutations, the lack of mutational clustering, and the presence of several homologous loci. To date, about 80% of the reported NF1 mutations are predicted to result in protein truncation, but very few studies have correlated the causative NF1 mutation with its effect at the protein level. We evaluated a novel diagnostic method to detect truncated forms of neurofibromin in a large cohort of unrelated subjects suspected of having NF1, according to the NIH consensus criteria. Western blot analysis was carried out on protein extracts from patients' leukocytes to highlight the possible presence of altered neurofibromin as a result of mutations in NF1. Truncated neurofibromin was identified in 274/336 patients (81%), confirming the usefulness and reproducibility of the proposed diagnostic approach. Our methodology can be routinely applied in the diagnostic setting, thanks to its simplicity and reliability. Combined with molecular approaches, it may increase the accuracy and efficiency of NF1 genetic testing. We evaluated a novel diagnostic method to detect truncated forms of neurofibromin in patients fulfilling the clinical criteria for Neurofibromatosis 1. Western blot analysis identified truncated neurofibromin in 274/336 patients (81%). Our results indicate that the proposed technique is cheap and reliable, and could ideally be performed as a preliminary biochemical screening before molecular analysis of the NF1 gene.

Nf1 regulates alcohol dependence-associated excessive drinking and gamma-aminobutyric acid release in the central amygdala in mice and is associated with alcohol dependence in humans.

BACKGROUND: The neurofibromatosis type 1 (Nf1) gene encodes a GTPase activating protein that negatively regulates small GTPases of the Ras family. METHODS: We assessed alcohol-related behaviors including alcohol sensitivity, dependent and nondependent drinking, and basal and alcohol-induced gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) release in the central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA) in Nf1 heterozygous null mice (Nf1(+/-)). We also investigated the associations of NF1 polymorphisms with alcohol dependence risk and severity in humans. RESULTS: Nf1(+/-) mice do not differ from wild-type mice in nondependent drinking, such as 24-hour, 2-bottle choice drinking in the dark binge drinking or limited access 2-bottle choice. However, Nf1(+/-) mice failed to escalate alcohol drinking following chronic intermittent ethanol vapor exposure (CIE) to induce dependence. Alcohol acutely increases GABA release in the CeA and alcohol dependence is characterized by increased baseline GABA release in CeA. Interestingly, GABA release in Nf1(+/-) mice is greater at baseline than wild-type mice, is not elevated by induction of dependence by CIE, and failed to show alcohol-induced facilitation both before and after CIE. Additionally, we observed that multiple variants in the human NF1 gene are associated with a quantitative measure of alcohol dependence in both African Americans and European Americans. CONCLUSIONS: In this translational investigation, we found that Nf1 activity regulates excessive drinking and basal and ethanol-stimulated GABA release in the mouse central amygdala. We also found that genetic variation in NF1 may confer an inherent susceptibility to the transition from nondependent to dependent drinking in humans.

Brain imaging findings and social/emotional problems in Israeli children with neurofibromatosis type 1.

UNLABELLED: A potential association between brain MRI findings and social/emotional difficulties in children with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) was examined. Twenty-eight children with NF1 filled in the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), and possible associations between their responses and findings in their brain MRI were sought. T2 bright foci were identified in MRI scans of 24 patients (85 %). There were no associations between the presence of the bright foci in any specific brain region and any of the SDQ scores for the emotional/behavioral measures. Male patients had significantly abnormal SDQ scores and peer problems. Patients with abnormal SDQ scores were younger than those with normal SDQ scores (mean 13.2 years vs 14.3 years, respectively; p = 0.23). A comparison of the scores obtained in ours and in another group of 11 children with NF1 yielded a significant difference between the groups. CONCLUSION: We believe that the lack of correlation between the MRI findings and the social/emotional parameters of the SDQ is another demonstration of the marked clinical variability characteristic of NF1.

PRC2 loss amplifies Ras signaling in cancer.

The histone-modifying PRC2 complex has an ambiguous role in cancer, bearing both oncogenic and tumor-suppressive features depending on cell type. Studies of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) have now identified loss-of-function mutations altering PRC2 subunits, leading to the amplification of Ras-driven transcription and conferring vulnerability to BRD4 inhibitors.

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) and associated tumors.

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a frequent neurocutaneous syndrome that predisposes for various benign and malignant tumors. Most characteristic are neurofibromas which occur in almost all NF1 patients at some point in lifetime. Although neurofibromas are benign tumors they can be disfiguring and plexiform neurofibromas may progress to malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Overall survival rates of patients with these malignant tumors are poor. Other neoplasias frequently observed in NF1 patients are pilocytic astrocytomas, gastrointestinal stromal tumors, pheochromocytomas and juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia. Several other tumors have been reported in NF1 patients but it is unclear if there is a true association between the particular tumor type and NF1. Some of these tumors might be caused by a rare recessively inherited childhood cancer syndrome termed constitutive mismatch repair deficiency syndrome which shows certain phenotypic overlap with NF1 but includes a broad spectrum of tumors which usually do not occur in NF1. The development of NF1-associated tumors is largely explained by the underlying defect of the NF1 gene which results in activation of the RAS proto-oncogene- a key mechanism of tumorigenesis. Several downstream effectors of activated RAS as well as cooperating molecular pathways have been identified. These insights provide the basis to develop novel targeted treatment strategies which are urgently needed to improve the outcome for patients with NF1-associated malignancies.

An expanding role for RAS GTPase activating proteins (RAS GAPs) in cancer.

The RAS pathway is one of the most commonly deregulated pathways in human cancer. Mutations in RAS genes occur in nearly 30% of all human tumors. However in some tumor types RAS mutations are conspicuously absent or rare, despite the fact that RAS and downstream effector pathways are hyperactivated. Recently, RAS GTPase Activating Proteins (RAS GAPs) have emerged as an expanding class of tumor suppressors that, when inactivated, provide an alternative mechanism of activating RAS. RAS GAPs normally turn off RAS by catalyzing the hydrolysis of RAS-GTP. As such, the loss of a RAS GAP would be expected to promote excessive RAS activation. Indeed, this is the case for the NF1 gene, which plays an established role in a familial tumor predisposition syndrome and a variety of sporadic cancers. However, there are 13 additional RAS GAP family members in the human genome. We are only now beginning to understand why there are so many RAS GAPs, how they differentially function, and what their potential role(s) in human cancer are. This review will focus on our current understanding of RAS GAPs in human disease and will highlight important outstanding questions.

Advances in the treatment of neurofibromatosis-associated tumours.

Neurofibromatosis (NF) comprises two distinct genetic disorders-neurofibromatosis type 1 and 2 (NF1 and NF2)-in which affected individuals develop both benign and malignant tumours. NF1 results from germline mutations in the NF1 gene that encodes neurofibromin, while NF2 results from germline mutations in the NF2 gene that encodes merlin (or schwannomin). The major tumour types arising in individuals with NF1 include neurofibromas, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours, and gliomas, whereas NF2 is characterized by the formation of schwannomas, meningiomas, and ependymomas. With the identification of the NF1 and NF2 genes and the generation of robust preclinical mouse models of NF-associated neoplasms, novel treatments that specifically target the growth control pathways deregulated in these tumours have been discovered, some of which are now being tested in clinical trials in individuals with NF1 and NF2. In this Review, we will highlight the key clinical features of NF1 and NF2 and the advances in future clinical management based on an improved understanding of the function of the NF1 and NF2 genes and the development of small-animal models.

Genetically mediated Nf1 loss in mice promotes diverse radiation-induced tumors modeling second malignant neoplasms.

Second malignant neoplasms (SMN) are therapy-induced malignancies and a growing problem in cancer survivors, particularly survivors of childhood cancers. The lack of experimental models of SMNs has limited understanding of their pathogenesis. It is currently not possible to predict or prevent this devastating late complication. Individuals with neurofibromatosis I (NF1) are at increased risk of developing therapy-induced cancers for unclear reasons. To model SMNs, we replicated clinical radiotherapy and delivered fractionated abdominal irradiation to Nf1(+/-) and wild-type mice. Similar to irradiated cancer survivors, irradiated wild-type and Nf1(+/-) mice developed diverse in-field malignancies. In Nf1(+/-) mice, fractionated irradiation promoted both classical NF1-associated malignancies and malignancies unassociated with the NF1 syndrome but typical of SMNs. Nf1 heterozygosity potentiated the mutagenic effects of irradiation, as evidenced by the significantly reduced survival after irradiation and tumor development that was often characterized by synchronous primary tumors. Interestingly, diverse radiation-induced tumors arising in wild-type and Nf1(+/-) mice shared a genetic signature characterized by monoallelic loss of Nf1 and the adjacent Trp53 allele. These findings implicate Nf1 loss as mediating tumorigenesis in a broad range of cell types and organs extending beyond the classical NF1 tumor histologies. Examining clinical SMN samples, we found LOH of NF1 in SMNs from non-NF1 patients. Nf1 heterozygosity confers broad susceptibility to genotoxin-induced tumorigenesis, and this paradigm serves as an experimental platform for future studies of SMNs.

A new nonsense mutation in the NF1 gene with neurofibromatosis-Noonan syndrome phenotype.

PURPOSE: Neurofibromatosis-Noonan syndrome is a rare autosomal dominant disorder which combines neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) features with Noonan syndrome. NF1 gene mutations are reported in the majority of these patients. METHOD: Sequence analysis of the established genes for Noonan syndrome revealed no mutation; a heterozygous NF1 point mutation c.7549C>T in exon 51, creating a premature stop codon (p.R2517X), had been demonstrated. RESULT: Neurofibromatosis-Noonan syndrome recently has been considered a subtype of NF1 and caused by different NF1 mutations. CONCLUSION: We report the case of a 14-year-old boy with neurofibromatosis type 1 with Noonan-like features, who complained of headache with triventricular hydrocephaly and a heterozygous NF1 point mutation c.7549C>T in exon 51.

[Genetics of paragangliomas and pheochromocytomas]. / La génétique des paragangliomes et des phéochromocytomes.

Pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas are rare tumors that arise from chromaffin tissues of the adrenal medulla and from sympathetic and parasympathetic ganglia. Ten susceptibility genes (VHL, RET, NF1, SDHA, B, C and D, SDHAF2, TMEM127 and finally MAX) are responsible for at least 30% of the cases. These patients can either have a familial history of the disease, a syndromic presentation, but can also emerge as apparently sporadic forms. Moreover, recent transcriptomic studies have led to the identification of somatic mutations in VHL and RET genes in 15% of sporadic cases, thus bringing a molecular explanation for nearly half of all cases. These findings have had a major impact on the understanding of the molecular mechanisms of tumorigenesis in pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas. It was shown that the genetic status of tumors is associated with particular transcription signatures, such as the activation of the pseudohypoxic response or the activation of MAPK or mTOR signalling. From nowadays to a close future, these advances will have important consequences on the monitoring of patients, from genetic counseling to a personalized clinical management.