Antenatal RHD screening to guide antenatal anti-D immunoprophylaxis in non-immunized D- pregnant women.

In pregnancy, D- pregnant women may be at risk of becoming immunized against D when carrying a D+ fetus, which may eventually lead to hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. Administrating antenatal and postnatal anti-D immunoglobulin prophylaxis decreases the risk of immunization substantially. Noninvasive fetal RHD genotyping, based on testing cell-free DNA extracted from maternal plasma, offers a reliable tool to predict the fetal RhD phenotype during pregnancy. Used as a screening program, antenatal RHD screening can guide the administration of antenatal prophylaxis in non-immunized D- pregnant women so that unnecessary prophylaxis is avoided in those women who carry a D- fetus. In Europe, antenatal RHD screening programs have been running since 2009, demonstrating high test accuracies and program feasibility. In this review, an overview is provided of current state-of-the-art antenatal RHD screening, which includes discussions on the rationale for its implementation, methodology, detection strategies, and test performance. The performance of antenatal RHD screening in a routine setting is characterized by high accuracy, with a high diagnostic sensitivity of ≥99.9 percent. The result of using antenatal RHD screening is that 97-99 percent of the women who carry a D- fetus avoid unnecessary prophylaxis. As such, this activity contributes to avoiding unnecessary treatment and saves valuable anti-D immunoglobulin, which has a shortage worldwide. The main challenges for a reliable noninvasive fetal RHD genotyping assay are low cell-free DNA levels, the genetics of the Rh blood group system, and choosing an appropriate detection strategy for an admixed population. In many parts of the world, however, the main challenge is to improve the basic care for D- pregnant women.

Anti-D alloimmunization in Rh(D) negative adults with severe traumatic injury.

INTRODUCTION: Widely varying rates of alloimmunization associated with transfusing uncrossmatched RBC products to trauma patients as part of hemostatic resuscitation have been reported. We characterized the rates of RBC alloimmunization in our severely injured Rh(D) negative trauma population who received uncrossmatched Rh(D) positive RBC products. METHODS: In a 10-year retrospective analysis to assess Rh(D) alloimmunization risks, Rh(D) negative adult trauma patients initially requiring uncrossmatched group O Rh(D) positive RBC products with either RBC units or low titer group O whole blood as part of massive transfusion protocol (MTP) activation were identified. Only those Rh(D) negative patients whose initial antibody screenings were negative were included. Duration of serologic follow-up from date of MTP activation to either date of anti-D detection or most recent negative antibody screening was calculated. RESULTS: There were 129 eligible Rh(D) negative trauma patients identified. Median injury severity score was 25. Anti-D was detected in 10 (7.8%) patients after a median of 161.5 days; the median duration of serologic follow-up in those who did not have anti-D detected was 220 days. Patients who had anti-D detected were less severely injured and received fewer Rh(D) positive RBC products versus those who did not. DISCUSSION: In our severely injured adult trauma patients with MTP activation requiring uncrossmatched group O Rh(D) positive RBC products, the rate of anti-D detection was low. Additional studies are necessary to determine generalizability of these findings and fully characterize alloimmunization risks in trauma patients with varying extents of injury.

An unusual case of anti-D detection in two consecutive D+ patient samples: Antibody carryover on an automated gel platform.

BACKGROUND: Laboratory results can be affected by sample to sample carryover. Carryover of different analytes occurring in automated clinical chemistry, immunology, hematology, and molecular laboratories is well described. However, carryover in a transfusion service laboratory is not reported in medical literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Immunohematology testing results, demographic data, and clinical data were reviewed on three patients retrospectively from 2015 to 2019. RESULTS: Type and screen samples tested on automated gel platform from two D+ patients were affected by anti-D carryover from a patient sample with a very high-titer anti-D. Additional immunohematology and molecular testing confirmed that anti-D in samples of two D+ patients was due to carryover. CONCLUSION: A case of anti-D carryover caused false detection of anti-D in two D+ patients. Carryover can have implications for patient management. Transfusion laboratory staff need to be aware of it and investigate any unexpected results further.

Racial/ethnic disparities among women receiving intrauterine transfusions for alloimmunization at a single fetal treatment center.

Disparities are prevalent in numerous areas of healthcare. We sought to investigate whether there were racial/ethnic disparities among pregnant women with the most severe form of alloimmunization who require intrauterine transfusions (IUT). We reviewed patients who underwent IUT for alloimmunization at a single fetal treatment center between 2015 and 2020. This "IUT cohort" was compared to an "Alloimmunization cohort": patients seen at our institution with a diagnosis of alloimmunization during pregnancy, who did not receive IUT. We collected maternal demographics including self-identified race/ethnicity and primary language, transfusion, and antibody characteristics. The cohorts were compared using unpaired t-tests, Mann-Whitney tests, and Fischer's exact tests, as appropriate. The IUT cohort included 43 patients and the alloimmunization cohort included 1049 patients. Compared to the alloimmunization cohort, there were significantly more patients of Latina descent in the IUT cohort (23.3% vs. 3.4%, p < .0001), and more non-English speakers (18.6% vs. 4.6%, p = .001). Twenty-one percent (9/43) of patients had immigrated to the United States, all of whom had pregnancies or miscarriages in their country of origin. A third of patients had new antibodies identified on serial screens during the current pregnancy. Significantly more women of Latina ethnicity and non-English speakers required IUTs compared to the cohort of women with alloimmunization. Insufficient access to care prior to arriving in the United States and among racial and ethnic minorities in the United States may contribute to these findings. Providers should be cognizant of potential, racial, and ethnic inequalities among women receiving intrauterine transfusions.

Evaluating automated titre score as an alternative to continuous flow analysis for the prediction of passive anti-D in pregnancy.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the potential of the automated titre score (TS) as an alternative method to continuous flow analysis (CFA) for the prediction of the nature of anti-D in pregnancy. BACKGROUND: The 2016 revised British Society for Haematology (BSH) antenatal guidelines recommended a measurement of anti-D concentration by CFA to ensure the detection of potential immune anti-D. Due to high referral costs and resource pressures, uptake has been challenging for hospital laboratories. Serious Hazards of transfusion (SHOT) data have previously shown that this has contributed to missed antenatal follow ups for women with immune anti-D and neonates affected by haemolytic disease of the fetus/newborn. METHODS/MATERIALS: In this multicentre comparative study, samples referred for CFA quantification were also tested by an ORTHO VISION automated anti-D indirect antiglobulin test (IAT) serial dilution and then converted to TS. CFA results and history of anti-D prophylaxis were used to categorise samples as passive or immune, with the aim of determining a potential TS cut-off for CFA referral of at risk patients. RESULTS: Five UK National Health Service (NHS) trusts generated a total of 196 anti-D TS results, of which 128 were classified as passive and 68 as immune. Diagnostic testing of CFA and TS values indicated a TS cut-off of 35 to assist in distinguishing the nature of anti-D. Using this cut-off, 175 (89%) results were correctly assigned into the passive or immune range, giving a specificity of 92.19% and a negative predictive value of 91.47%. CONCLUSION: TS in conjunction with clinical and anti-D prophylaxis history can be used as a viable and cost-effective alternative to CFA in a hospital laboratory setting.

Red blood cell alloimmunization prevalence and hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn in Israel: A retrospective study.

Hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) is a severe form of anemia caused by maternal antibodies against fetal red blood cells (RBC) that can cause intrauterine and perinatal morbidity and mortality. The prevalence and specificities of alloantibodies among Israeli pregnant women and clinical outcomes for their fetuses and newborns are unknown. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A retrospective study of women who gave birth between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2011, was performed. Data were obtained for obstetric admissions from 16 of 27 hospitals, which included results of maternal ABO, D, antibody screens, antibody identification, and requirements for intrauterine or newborn exchange transfusions. RESULTS: Data on 90 948 women representing 70% of all births during 2011 were analyzed. Antibody screen was positive in 5245 (5.8%) women. Alloantibodies, excluding anti-D titer (<16) were identified in 900 (1.0%) women. Of 191 D- women, 75 (39.3%) had anti-D titer of 16 or greater. Other common clinically significant antibodies were anti-E (204, 23%), anti-K (145, 16%), and anti-c (97, 10.8%) alone or in antibody combinations. Multiple alloantibodies were observed in 132 of 900 (15%) of women. Severe HDFN developed in 6.8% (9/132) of these pregnancies. Seventeen fetuses and newborns (0.02% of births) including one set of twins required RBC transfusions. Two fetuses whose mothers had multiple alloantibodies received intrauterine transfusions; one of them was hydropic and died. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of RBC alloantibodies was 1.0% among Israeli pregnant women. Transfusion was required in 0.02% of the fetuses and newborns. Severe HDFN developed in 6.8% of pregnancies with multiple maternal alloantibodies.

Red blood cell alloimmunisation after platelet transfusion (excluding ABO blood group system).

Red blood cell alloimmunisation after transfusion of red blood cell concentrates carries a risk for every recipient. This risk is particularly high for patients with conditions such as sickle cell disease. However, red blood cell alloimmunisation can also occur after platelet concentrate transfusion. All blood group systems other than ABO are affected, and there are several mechanisms responsible for this alloimmunisation. The practical implications of this are a need to match red blood cell concentrates in all alloimmunised patients and, in pregnant women, recongnition of the risk of developing haemolytic disease of the foetus and newborn. Several measures can be taken to prevent alloimmunisation: in the case of the D antigen, for example, anti-RhD immunoglobulins can be infused before transfusing platelet concentrates from an RhD-positive donor in a RhD-negative recipient.

Transfusión de hematíes D positivo a pacientes seleccionados D negativo / Transfusion of D positive red cells to selected D-negative patients

INTRODUCCIÓN: La transfusión isogrupo ABO D es la práctica transfusional habitual, sin embargo, cuando no se dispone de sangre D negativo puede ser preciso transfundir concentrados de hematíes D positivo a pacientes D negativo. Estos pacientes pueden desarrollar aloanticuerpos anti-D en los siguientes 3 meses a la exposición. MATERIAL Y MÉTODO: En los últimos 18 años, hemos experimentado situaciones de escasez de sangre D negativo, en las que hemos aplicado un protocolo clínico asistencial, seleccionando s los pacientes según el riesgo de aloinmunización y de requerimientos transfusionales crónicos. Se realizó una recogida prospectiva de estos pacientes, analizando principalmente la aloinmunización y la mortalidad. RESULTADOS: Tras las aplicación del protocolo se han transfundido unidades D positivo al 3% de los pacientes D negativo, con una tasa de aloinmunización conocida del 12,3%, siendo mayor en los pacientes más jóvenes y en aquellos que han recibido mayor número de unidades. No se detectaron complicaciones secundarias a la inmunización y la mortalidad en este grupo fue menor. CONCLUSIÓN: La transfusión de hematíes D positivo a pacientes D negativo no solo es una práctica segura para pacientes seleccionados, sino que además permite optimizar el uso de un producto en situaciones de escasez

BACKGROUND: To transfuse packed red blood cells isogroup ABO D is a usual transfusion practice. However, when there is not enough D negative blood available, we can transfuse positive red blood cells to negative patients. Immunocompetent D negative individuals may develop serologically detectable anti-D antibodies within 3 months after exposure to D positive red blood cells. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Over the last 18 years, we have experienced situations of D negative blood cell scarcity. In these situations, we have applied a clinical assistance protocol, selecting patients with lower risk of alloimmunization and chronic transfusion requirements. We have retrospectively evaluated this policy for the use of D positive red blood cells in D negative patients, focussing on alloinmunization and mortality. RESULTS: Applying the protocol, 3% of D negative patients were transfused with D positive units, with an alloimmunization rate of 12.3%. The rate of alloimmunization was higher in the younger age group and in those transfused with more units. No haemolytic reactions were reported. Mortality in the alloimmunized group was lower. CONCLUSION: The use of D positive red blood cells in selected D negative patients does not induce adverse reactions, is a safe practice and allows saving of a product that is sometimes limited

Frequency and clinical significance of red cell antibodies in pregnancy - A prospective study from India.

BACKGROUND: For appropriate management of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN), it is important to detect irregular red cell antibody in the antenatal period. Though it is a simple one-step method, it is not part of routine antenatal screening in many developing countries. To reiterate the importance of antenatal antibody screening, we have assessed the frequency and clinical significance of irregular red cell antibodies in our patient population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective study was carried out from October 2013 to May 2015 at a tertiary care center from south India. All antenatal samples received by the laboratory for red cell antibody screening were screened using a commercial three-cell screening panel. Antibody identification along with further Immunohematological techniques as required were performed for cases with positive screening results. Neonates of the alloimmunized cases were followed up to determine the clinical significance of the antibody. RESULTS: A total of 2336 antenatal mothers were screened for red cell antibodies. The overall rate of alloimmunization in the study group was 2.27%. Alloimmunization rate among RhD-negative pregnancies was 6.9%. Other than anti-D (49%), we identified anti-D + anti-C (5%), anti-G (5%), anti-c (5%), anti-E (2%), anti-e (2%), anti-H (Bombay phenotype) (7%), anti-M (2%), anti-Lea (2%), anti-Leb (12%), and autoantibodies (9%) in the maternal serum. Anti-D, anti-D + anti-C, anti-G, anti-c, and anti-H were found to be clinically significant in this study. CONCLUSION: This study showed that 1 in 125 RhD-positive pregnancies can develop red cell alloantibodies. Hence, implementing routine antenatal antibody screening irrespective of RhD status is essential.

Rhesus D alloimmunization in pregnancy from 1996 to 2015 in Iceland: a nation-wide population study prior to routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis.

BACKGROUND: Rhesus D (RhD) incompatibility is still the most important cause of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) worldwide. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence, causes, and consequences of anti-D alloimmunizations in pregnancy in Iceland, prior to implementation of targeted routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis (RAADP) in 2018. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a nation-wide cohort study of 130 pregnancies affected by RhD alloimmunization in Iceland in the period from 1996 through 2015. Data were collected from transfusion medicine databases, medical records, and the Icelandic Medical Birth Register. RESULTS: Of 130 RhD alloimmunizations, 80 cases (61.5%) represented new RhD immunization in the current pregnancy. Sensitization was discovered in the third trimester in 41 (51.3%) and occurred in the first pregnancy in 14 cases (17.5%). The most likely causative immunization event was the index pregnancy for 45 (56.25%), a previous pregnancy/birth for 26 (32.5%), abortion for 3 (3.75%), and unknown for 6 women (7.5%). Higher anti-D titers were associated with shorter gestational length, cesarean sections, positive direct antiglobulin test (DAT), and severe HDFN. Intrauterine transfusion (IUT) was performed in five pregnancies (3.8%), and 35 of 132 (26.5%) live-born neonates received treatment for HDFN; 32 received phototherapy (24.2%), 13 exchange transfusion (9.8%), and seven simple blood transfusion (5.3%). CONCLUSION: In about half of cases, RhD alloimmunization was caused by the index pregnancy and discovered in the third trimester. Thus, the newly implemented RAADP protocol should be effective in reducing the incidence of RhD immunization in Iceland in the future.

Severe haemolytic disease of a newborn with variant D mimicking blocked-D phenomenon.

Anti-D is still the most common antibody causing severe haemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). In a mother with a very high titer of anti-D, antibodies can coat and block the D antigens on the red blood cells of the newborn. This blocking phenomenon prevents agglutination of the D-positive red cells with the IgM anti-D typing reagent, giving false negative results. Here, we report the case of a newborn with variant D phenotype and severe HDFN, which mimicked the blocked-D phenomenon, which, at the first instance, confused both the treating clinicians and the transfusion service personnel.

Single dose v two-dose antenatal anti-D prophylaxis: a randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare rates of detectability of circulating Rh(D)-immunoglobulin (anti-D) at delivery with single and two-dose antenatal anti-D prophylaxis (RAADP) regimens; to compare compliance with the two regimens. DESIGN: Open label, randomised controlled trial between May 2013 and November 2015. SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: 277 women who attended a tertiary obstetric referral hospital in Perth for antenatal care and were at least 18 years of age, less than 30 weeks pregnant and yet to receive RAADP, Rh(D)-negative (negative antibody screen), and who intended to deliver their baby at the hospital. Exclusion criteria were prior anti-D sensitisation, any contraindication of anti-D administration, and a history of isolated IgA deficiency. INTERVENTIONS: One 1500 IU anti-D dose at 28 weeks of pregnancy (single dose regimen); two doses of 625 IU each at 28 and 34 weeks of pregnancy (two-dose regimen). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the proportion of women with detectable anti-D levels at delivery; the secondary outcome was compliance with the allocated RAADP regimen. RESULTS: Circulating anti-D was detectable at delivery in a greater proportion of women in the two-dose group (111 of 129, 86%) than in the single dose group (70 of 125, 56%; P < 0.001). Compliance was not significantly different between the single dose (86 of 138, 61%) and two-dose groups (70 of 139, 50%; P = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: The two-dose RAADP schedule currently recommended in Australia provides better protection against Rh(D) sensitisation than a one-dose regimen. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12613000661774).

RHD genotyping of serologic RhD-negative blood donors in a hospital-based blood donor center.

BACKGROUND: Serologic RhD-negative blood donors are tested by a method known to detect weak D antigen expression. Serology does not detect all red blood cells with RhD expression and RHD genotyping has been used to identify variant RHD alleles, which may lead to some RhD expression. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of RHD variant alleles in serologic RhD-negative blood donors at a hospital-based donor center in Los Angeles. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: RHD genotyping of serologic RhD-negative blood donors over a 20-month period was performed using the Immucor RHD BeadChip assay. DNA sequencing was performed when the RHD BeadChip assay failed to assign a genotype. For RHD variants known or suspected to result in RhD expression, recipients of previous blood donations were investigated for alloimmunization. RESULTS: RHD genotyping was performed in 1174 RhD-negative blood donors, and 1122 were genotyped for RHCE variants. Eleven donors (0.94%) harbored mutations predicted to yield RhD expression. The predicted phenotypes were, in decreasing frequency, DEL, partial, and weak D phenotypes. Anti-D was not detected in 16 patients who had received blood from these donors after an average follow up of 182 days. CONCLUSION: Genotyping can be used to identify donors with the potential to sensitize RhD-negative recipients. In this limited study, 0.94% of serologic RhD-negative blood donors were found to have variant RHD alleles that might cause alloimmunization in RhD-negative recipients. To our knowledge, a study of this nature has not been reported in the United States.

Severe anti-D haemolytic disease of fetal and newborn in rhesus D negative primigravida.

INTRODUCTION: Anti-D alloimmunisation may occur from the blood transfusion or fetomaternal haemorrhage which can lead to haemolytic disease of fetal and newborn (HDFN). The morbidity and mortality of HDFN related to anti-D is significantly reduced after introduction of anti-D prophylaxis and furthermore, anti-D HDFN in RhD negative primigravida is uncommonly seen. CASE REPORT: A case of unusual severe HDFN due to anti-D alloimmunisation in undiagnosed RhD negative primigravida Malay woman is reported here. This case illustrates the possibility of an anamnestic response from previous unknown sensitisation event or the development of anti-D in mid trimester. The newborn expired due to hydrops fetalis and severe anaemia. Antenatally, the mother was identified as RhD positive and thus there was no antenatal antibody screening, antepartum anti-D prophylaxis or close fetal monitoring for HDFN. DISCUSSION: The thorough antenatal ABO and RhD blood grouping with antibody screening is mandatory as part of prevention and early detection of HDFN especially due to anti-D alloimmunisation. Improper management of RhD negative women might lead to severe HDFN including in primigravida.

Noninvasive fetal RHD genotyping to guide targeted anti-D prophylaxis-an external quality assessment workshop.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Fetal RHD genotyping of cell-free fetal DNA from RhD-negative pregnant women can be used to guide targeted antenatal and postnatal anti-D prophylaxis for the prevention of RhD immunization. To assure the quality of clinical testing, we conducted an external quality assessment workshop with the participation of 28 laboratories. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Aliquots of pooled maternal plasma were sent to each laboratory. One sample was positive, and the second sample was negative for fetal RHD, verified by pre-workshop testing using quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) analysis of RHD exons 4, 5, 7 and 10. Plasma samples were shipped at room temperature. A reporting scheme was supplied for data collection, including questions regarding the methodological setup, results and clinical recommendations. Different methodological approaches were used, all employing qPCR with a total of eight different combinations of RHD exon targets. The samples were tested blindly. RESULTS: Fetal RHD genotyping was performed with no false-negative and no false-positive results. One inconclusive result was reported for the RHD-positive sample, and four inconclusive results were reported for the RHD-negative sample. All clinical conclusions were satisfactory. CONCLUSION: This external quality assessment workshop demonstrates that despite the different approaches taken to perform the clinical assays, fetal RHD genotyping is a reliable laboratory assay to guide targeted use of Rh prophylaxis in a clinical setting.

Production of RBC autoantibody mimicking anti-D specificity following transfusion in a patient with weak D Type 15.

BACKGROUND: Weak D-type RBCs have fewer D epitopes, but it remains unclear whether individuals with certain types of weak D produce alloanti-D directed at D epitopes absent from the RBCs, and whether it is an alloantibody or an autoantibody. We report the first case of a patient with a weak D Type 15 who produced autoantibodies mimicking alloanti-D. CASE REPORT: A 52-year-old Japanese male with weak D developed anti-D 3 months after transfusion of D-negative and -positive RBCs, and the antibody persisted for 24 months with a consistently negative direct antiglobulin test. Eluates from the patient's RBCs demonstrated anti-D specificity. The recipient did not exhibit any signs of delayed hemolytic transfusion reaction. As his anti-D was removed by the different adsorbing cells of weak D Type 15 and autologous as well as D positive, D negative, weak D Type 24, and partial DVa, it was thought to be an autoantibody mimicking anti-D rather than an alloantibody. The patient's RBCs reacted weakly with the 13 anti-D reagents used in the study. Polymerase chain reaction and nucleotide sequencing revealed that the patient had an RHD genotype of RHD*01N.01/RHD*15. CONCLUSION: Anti-D, produced in a patient with weak D Type 15 after transfusion, was found to be mimicking autoanti-D. Alloanti-D was excluded by an adsorption study with different RBC types.

Rh (D) alloimmunization treated by double filtration plasmapheresis.

Here in this report a 31 year old pregnant woman with positive serum antiglobulin test against anti-D antierythrocyte antibodies who was treated succesfully with double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) is presented. The DFPP was started in the early stage of pregnancy together with intravenous immunoglobulin therapy and the antierythrocyte antibody titer of the patient was successfully maintained in a stable level below 1:64 dilution. She delivered successfully on the 30th week of gestation. The favorable outcome of this patient implies that DFPP is an effective and safe treatment modality in pregnant women with red cell alloimmunization.