Toward Equitable Precision Oncology: Monitoring Racial and Ethnic Inclusion in Genomics and Clinical Trials.

PURPOSE: Ethnic diversity in cancer research is crucial as race/ethnicity influences cancer incidence, survival, drug response, molecular pathways, and epigenetic phenomena. In 2018, we began a project to examine racial/ethnic diversity in cancer research, with a commitment to review these disparities every 4 years. This report is our second assessment, detailing the present state of racial/ethnic diversity in cancer genomics and clinical trials. METHODS: To study racial/ethnic inclusion in cancer genomics, we extracted ethnic records from all data sets available at cBioPortal (n = 125,128 patients) and cancer-related genome-wide association studies (n = 28,011,282 patients) between 2018 and 2022. Concerning clinical trials, we selected studies related to breast cancer (n = 125,518 patients, 181 studies), lung cancer (n = 34,329 patients, 119 studies), and colorectal cancer (n = 40,808 patients, 105 studies). RESULTS: In cancer genomics (N = 28,136,410), 3% of individuals lack racial/ethnic registries; tumor samples were collected predominantly from White patients (89.14%), followed by Asian (7%), African American (0.55%), and Hispanic (0.21%) patients and other populations (0.1%). In clinical trials (N = 200,655), data on race/ethnicity are missing for 60.14% of the participants; for individuals whose race/ethnicity was recorded, most were characterized as White (28.33%), followed by Asian (7.64%), African (1.79), other ethnicities (1.37), and Hispanic (0.73). Racial/ethnic representation significantly deviates from global ethnic proportions (P ≤ .001) across all data sets, with White patients outnumbering other ethnic groups by a factor of approximately 4-6. CONCLUSION: Our second update on racial/ethnic representation in cancer research highlights the persistent overrepresentation of White populations in cancer genomics and a notable absence of racial/ethnic information across clinical trials. To ensure more equitable and effective precision oncology, future efforts should address the reasons behind the insufficient representation of ethnically diverse populations in cancer research.

All of Us Program Illustrates What Less-Diverse Genomics Studies Might Be Missing.

This Medical News story discusses new findings from genomics studies involving diverse cohorts.

Landscape and Saturation Analysis of Mutations Associated With Race in Cancer Genomes by Clinical Sequencing.

Differences in cancer genomes between racial groups may impact tumor biology and health disparities. However, the discovery of race-associated mutations is constrained by the limited representation and sample size of different racial groups in prior genomic studies. We evaluated the influence of race on the frequency of gene mutations using the Genomics, Evidence, Neoplasia, Information, Exchange database, a large genomic dataset aggregated from clinical sequencing. Matched cohort analyses were used to identify histology-specific race-associated mutations including increased TERT promoter mutations in Black and Asian patients with gliomas and bladder cancers, and a decreased frequency of mutations in DNA repair pathway genes and subunits of the SWI/SNF chromatin complex in Asian and Black patients across multiple cancer types. The distribution of actionable mutations in oncogenes was also race-specific, demonstrating how targeted therapies may have a disparate impact on racial groups. Down-sampling analyses indicate that larger sample sizes are likely to discover more race-associated mutations. These results provide a resource to understand differences in cancer genomes between racial groups which may inform the design of clinical studies and patient recruitment strategies in biomarker trials.

Genomic data in the All of Us Research Program.

Comprehensively mapping the genetic basis of human disease across diverse individuals is a long-standing goal for the field of human genetics1-4. The All of Us Research Program is a longitudinal cohort study aiming to enrol a diverse group of at least one million individuals across the USA to accelerate biomedical research and improve human health5,6. Here we describe the programme's genomics data release of 245,388 clinical-grade genome sequences. This resource is unique in its diversity as 77% of participants are from communities that are historically under-represented in biomedical research and 46% are individuals from under-represented racial and ethnic minorities. All of Us identified more than 1 billion genetic variants, including more than 275 million previously unreported genetic variants, more than 3.9 million of which had coding consequences. Leveraging linkage between genomic data and the longitudinal electronic health record, we evaluated 3,724 genetic variants associated with 117 diseases and found high replication rates across both participants of European ancestry and participants of African ancestry. Summary-level data are publicly available, and individual-level data can be accessed by researchers through the All of Us Researcher Workbench using a unique data passport model with a median time from initial researcher registration to data access of 29 hours. We anticipate that this diverse dataset will advance the promise of genomic medicine for all.

Multi-ancestry meta-analysis of host genetic susceptibility to tuberculosis identifies shared genetic architecture.

The heritability of susceptibility to tuberculosis (TB) disease has been well recognized. Over 100 genes have been studied as candidates for TB susceptibility, and several variants were identified by genome-wide association studies (GWAS), but few replicate. We established the International Tuberculosis Host Genetics Consortium to perform a multi-ancestry meta-analysis of GWAS, including 14,153 cases and 19,536 controls of African, Asian, and European ancestry. Our analyses demonstrate a substantial degree of heritability (pooled polygenic h2 = 26.3%, 95% CI 23.7-29.0%) for susceptibility to TB that is shared across ancestries, highlighting an important host genetic influence on disease. We identified one global host genetic correlate for TB at genome-wide significance (p<5 × 10-8) in the human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-II region (rs28383206, p-value=5.2 × 10-9) but failed to replicate variants previously associated with TB susceptibility. These data demonstrate the complex shared genetic architecture of susceptibility to TB and the importance of large-scale GWAS analysis across multiple ancestries experiencing different levels of infection pressure.

Reduction in Breast Cancer Death With Adjuvant Chemotherapy Among US Women According to Race, Ethnicity, and the 21-Gene Recurrence Score.

BACKGROUND: We previously showed the 21-gene breast recurrence score (RS) has lower prognostic accuracy for non-Hispanic Black (NHB) compared with non-Hispanic White (NHW) women with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer. The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical validity of the RS for predicting chemotherapy benefit as recommended in the current NCCN Guidelines for Breast Cancer among women from diverse racial/ethnic groups. METHODS: Using the SEER Oncotype database, we estimated propensity score-weighted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals for breast cancer death with chemotherapy for women with ER-positive/HER2-negative, AJCC stages I-II, axillary node-negative, invasive breast cancer according to race/ethnicity. RESULTS: We included 6,033 (8.2%) Asian/Pacific Islander (API), 5,697 (7.8%) NHB, 6,688 (9.1%) Hispanic, and 54,945 (74.9%) NHW women. Breast cancer death was reduced with chemotherapy for NHB (HR, 0.48, 95% CI, 0.28-0.81), Hispanic (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.25-0.94), and NHW (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.65-0.99) women with an RS of 26 to 100. There was a nonsignificant reduction for API women (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.28-1.24). For women with an RS of 11 to 25, there was no reduction in death for any racial/ethnic group. Among women aged ≤50 years, the reduction in breast cancer death with chemotherapy differed according to race (NHB: HR, 0.37 [95% CI, 0.20-0.67]; NHW: HR, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.44-0.74]; Pinteraction for chemotherapy * race <.0499). An exploratory subgroup analysis found that young NHB women may benefit from chemotherapy at a lower RS cutoff than other women. CONCLUSIONS: The RS was clinically validated as a predictive biomarker for NHB, Hispanic, and NHW women with ER-positive, axillary node-negative breast cancer, but it may underestimate the benefit of chemotherapy for young NHB women. If this finding is confirmed, the RS cutoff for recommending adjuvant chemotherapy for young NHB women with ER-positive, axillary node-negative breast cancer may need to be lower than for other women.

Genetic Testing for Cancer Risk and Perceived Importance of Genetic Information Among US Population by Race and Ethnicity: a Cross-sectional Study.

BACKGROUND: Genetic testing can help determine the risk of many cancers and guide cancer prevention and treatment plans. Despite increasing concern about disparities in precision cancer medicine, public knowledge and cancer genetic testing by race and ethnicity have not been well investigated. METHODS: We analyzed data from the 2020 Health Information National Trends Survey in 2022. Self-reported cancer genetic testing (e.g., Lynch syndrome, BRCA1/2) knowledge and utilization were compared by race and ethnicity. Perceived importance of genetic information for cancer care (prevention, detection, and treatment) was also examined in relation to the uptake of cancer genetic testing. Multivariable logistic regression models were employed to examine factors associated with knowledge and genetic testing to calculate predicted probability of undergoing genetic testing by race and ethnicity. RESULTS: Of 3551 study participants, 37.8% reported having heard of genetic testing for cancer risk and 3.9% stated that they underwent cancer genetic testing. Being non-Hispanic Black (OR=0.47, 95% CI=0.30-0.75) or Hispanic (OR=0.56, CI=0.35-0.90) was associated with lower odds of genetic testing knowledge. Although Hispanic or non-Hispanic Black respondents were more likely to perceive higher importance of genetic information versus non-Hispanic Whites, they had a lower predicted probability of cancer genetic testing. CONCLUSION: Non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic adults had lower knowledge and were less likely to undergo cancer genetic testing than non-Hispanic Whites. Further research is needed on sources of genetic testing information for racial and ethnic minorities and the barriers to accessing genetic testing to inform the development of effective cancer risk genetic testing promotion.

A Systems Biology Approach to Understand the Racial Disparities in Colorectal Cancer.

Racial disparities between Black/African Americans (AA) and White patients in colorectal cancer are an ever-growing area of concern. Black/AA show the highest incidence and have the highest mortality among major U.S. racial groups. There is no definite cause other than possible sociodemographic, socioeconomic, education, nutrition, delivery of healthcare, screening, and cultural factors. A primary limitation in this field is the lack of and small sample size of Black/AA studies. Thus, this study aimed to investigate whether differences in gene expression contribute to this ongoing unanswered racial disparity issue. In this study, we examined transcriptomic data of Black/AA and White patient cohorts using a bioinformatic and systems biology approach. We performed a Kaplan-Meier overall survival analysis between both patient cohorts across critical colorectal cancer signal transduction networks (STN), to determine the differences in significant genes across each cohort. Other bioinformatic analyses performed included PROGENy (pathway responsive genes for activity inference), RNA sequencing differential expression using DESeq2, multivariable-adjusted regression, and other associated Kaplan-Meier analyses. These analyses identified novel prognostic genes independent from each cohort, 176 differentially expressed genes, and specific patient cohort STN survival associations. Despite the overarching limitation, the results revealed several novel differences in gene expression between the colorectal cancer Black/AA and White patient cohorts, which allows one to dive deeper into and understand the behavior on a systems level of what could be driving this racial difference across colorectal cancer. Concretely, this information can guide precision medicine approaches tailored specifically for colorectal cancer racial disparities. SIGNIFICANCE: The purpose of this work is to investigate the racial disparities in colorectal cancer between Black/AA and White patient cohorts using a systems biology and bioinformatic approach. Our study investigates the underlying biology of each patient cohort. Concretely, the findings of this study include disparity-associated genes and pathways, which provide a tangible starting point to guide precision medicine approaches tailored specifically for colorectal cancer racial disparities.

Imputation of race and ethnicity categories using genetic ancestry from real-world genomic testing data.

The incompleteness of race and ethnicity information in real-world data (RWD) hampers its utility in promoting healthcare equity. This study introduces two methods-one heuristic and the other machine learning-based-to impute race and ethnicity from genetic ancestry using tumor profiling data. Analyzing de-identified data from over 100,000 cancer patients sequenced with the Tempus xT panel, we demonstrate that both methods outperform existing geolocation and surname-based methods, with the machine learning approach achieving high recall (range: 0.859-0.993) and precision (range: 0.932-0.981) across four mutually exclusive race and ethnicity categories. This work presents a novel pathway to enhance RWD utility in studying racial disparities in healthcare.

EVALUATING THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN GENETIC ANCESTRY AND THE CLINICAL PHENOME.

There is a desire in research to move away from the concept of race as a clinical factor because it is a societal construct used as an imprecise proxy for geographic ancestry. In this study, we leverage the biobank from Vanderbilt University Medical Center, BioVU, to investigate relationships between genetic ancestry proportion and the clinical phenome. For all samples in BioVU, we calculated six ancestry proportions based on 1000 Genomes references: eastern African (EAFR), western African (WAFR), northern European (NEUR), southern European (SEUR), eastern Asian (EAS), and southern Asian (SAS). From PheWAS, we found phecode categories significantly enriched neoplasms for EAFR, WAFR, and SEUR, and pregnancy complication in SEUR, NEUR, SAS, and EAS (p < 0.003). We then selected phenotypes hypertension (HTN) and atrial fibrillation (AFib) to further investigate the relationships between these phenotypes and EAFR, WAFR, SEUR, and NEUR using logistic regression modeling and non-linear restricted cubic spline modeling (RCS). For EAS and SAS, we chose renal failure (RF) for further modeling. The relationships between HTN and AFib and the ancestries EAFR, WAFR, and SEUR were best fit by the linear model (beta p < 1x10-4 for all) while the relationships with NEUR were best fit with RCS (HTN ANOVA p = 0.001, AFib ANOVA p < 1x10-4). For RF, the relationship with SAS was best fit with a linear model (beta p < 1x10-4) while RCS model was a better fit for EAS (ANOVA p < 1x10-4). In this study, we identify relationships between genetic ancestry and phenotypes that are best fit with non-linear modeling techniques. The assumption of linearity for regression modeling is integral for proper fitting of a model and there is no knowing a priori to modeling if the relationship is truly linear.

Precision health equity for racialized communities.

In the last three decades, a cohort of genomicists have intentionally sought to include more racially diverse people in their research in human genomics and precision medicine. How such efforts to be inclusive in human genomic research and precision medicine are modeled and enacted, specifically if the terms of inclusion are equitable for these communities remains to be explored. In this commentary, we review the historical context in which issues of racial inclusion arose with early genome and genetics projects. We then discuss attempts to include racialized peoples in more recent human genomics research. In conclusion, we raise critical issues to consider in the future of equitable human genomics and precision medicine research involving racialized communities, particularly as it concerns working towards what we call Precision Health Equity (PHE). Specifically, we examine issues of genetic data governance and the terms of participation in inclusive human genomics and precision health research. We do so by drawing on insights and protocols developed by researchers investigating Indigenous Data Sovereignty and propose exploring their application and adaptation to precision health research involving racialized communities.

Rates and Classification of Variants of Uncertain Significance in Hereditary Disease Genetic Testing.

Importance: Variants of uncertain significance (VUSs) are rampant in clinical genetic testing, frustrating clinicians, patients, and laboratories because the uncertainty hinders diagnoses and clinical management. A comprehensive assessment of VUSs across many disease genes is needed to guide efforts to reduce uncertainty. Objective: To describe the sources, gene distribution, and population-level attributes of VUSs and to evaluate the impact of the different types of evidence used to reclassify them. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used germline DNA variant data from individuals referred by clinicians for diagnostic genetic testing for hereditary disorders. Participants included individuals for whom gene panel testing was conducted between September 9, 2014, and September 7, 2022. Data were analyzed from September 1, 2022, to April 1, 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures: The outcomes of interest were VUS rates (stratified by age; clinician-reported race, ethnicity, and ancestry groups; types of gene panels; and variant attributes), percentage of VUSs reclassified as benign or likely benign vs pathogenic or likely pathogenic, and enrichment of evidence types used for reclassifying VUSs. Results: The study cohort included 1 689 845 individuals ranging in age from 0 to 89 years at time of testing (median age, 50 years), with 1 203 210 (71.2%) female individuals. There were 39 150 Ashkenazi Jewish individuals (2.3%), 64 730 Asian individuals (3.8%), 126 739 Black individuals (7.5%), 5539 French Canadian individuals (0.3%), 169 714 Hispanic individuals (10.0%), 5058 Native American individuals (0.3%), 2696 Pacific Islander individuals (0.2%), 4842 Sephardic Jewish individuals (0.3%), and 974 383 White individuals (57.7%). Among all individuals tested, 692 227 (41.0%) had at least 1 VUS and 535 385 (31.7%) had only VUS results. The number of VUSs per individual increased as more genes were tested, and most VUSs were missense changes (86.6%). More VUSs were observed per sequenced gene in individuals who were not from a European White population, in middle-aged and older adults, and in individuals who underwent testing for disorders with incomplete penetrance. Of 37 699 unique VUSs that were reclassified, 30 239 (80.2%) were ultimately categorized as benign or likely benign. A mean (SD) of 30.7 (20.0) months elapsed for VUSs to be reclassified to benign or likely benign, and a mean (SD) of 22.4 (18.9) months elapsed for VUSs to be reclassified to pathogenic or likely pathogenic. Clinical evidence contributed most to reclassification. Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study of approximately 1.6 million individuals highlighted the need for better methods for interpreting missense variants, increased availability of clinical and experimental evidence for variant classification, and more diverse representation of race, ethnicity, and ancestry groups in genomic databases. Data from this study could provide a sound basis for understanding the sources and resolution of VUSs and navigating appropriate next steps in patient care.

Blood Group Serology and "Race": Looking Back to Move Forward.

Less than a decade after the discovery of the ABO antigens as a Mendelian inherited trait, blood group antigen frequencies were first used to define racial groups. This approach, known as seroanthropology, was the basis for collecting large amounts of blood group frequency data in different populations and was also sometimes used for racist purposes. Ultimately, population geneticists used these data to disprove race as a biological construct. Through understanding the history of seroanthropology, and recognizing the harms of its lingering presence, healthcare providers can better practice race-conscious, as opposed to race-based, transfusion medicine.