Laboratory diagnosis of creatine deficiency syndromes: a technical standard and guideline of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.

Disclaimer: These ACMG Standards and Guidelines are intended as an educational resource for clinical laboratory geneticists to help them provide quality clinical laboratory genetic services. Adherence to these standards and guidelines is voluntary and does not necessarily assure a successful medical outcome. These Standards and Guidelines should not be considered inclusive of all proper procedures and tests or exclusive of others that are reasonably directed to obtaining the same results. In determining the propriety of any specific procedure or test, clinical laboratory geneticists should apply their professional judgment to the specific circumstances presented by the patient or specimen. Clinical laboratory geneticists are encouraged to document in the patient's record the rationale for the use of a particular procedure or test, whether or not it is in conformance with these Standards and Guidelines. They also are advised to take notice of the date any particular guideline was adopted, and to consider other relevant medical and scientific information that becomes available after that date. It also would be prudent to consider whether intellectual property interests may restrict the performance of certain tests and other procedures.Cerebral creatine deficiency syndromes are neurometabolic conditions characterized by intellectual disability, seizures, speech delay, and behavioral abnormalities. Several laboratory methods are available for preliminary and confirmatory diagnosis of these conditions, including measurement of creatine and related metabolites in biofluids using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry or gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, enzyme activity assays in cultured cells, and DNA sequence analysis. These guidelines are intended to standardize these procedures to help optimize the diagnosis of creatine deficiency syndromes. While biochemical methods are emphasized, considerations for confirmatory molecular testing are also discussed, along with variables that influence test results and interpretation.Genet Med 19 2, 256-263.

Case study for the evaluation of current treatment recommendations of guanidinoacetate methyltransferase deficiency: ineffectiveness of sodium benzoate.

BACKGROUND: Guanidinoacetate methyltransferase deficiency is an autosomal recessively inherited disorder of creatine biosynthesis. We report a new patient with guanidinoacetate methyltransferase deficiency and her >3-year treatment outcome. PATIENT: This is a 6-year-old girl who was diagnosed with guanidinoacetate methyltransferase deficiency at the age of 28 months. She presented with moderate global developmental delay, one afebrile seizure, and hypotonia between 6 and 18 months of life. She was treated with creatine and ornithine supplementation and a strict arginine-restricted diet for 42 months. RESULTS: Mutation analysis (compound heterozygous mutations, a known c.327G>A and a novel c.58dupT [p.Trp20LeufsX65]) and enzyme studies in primary fibroblasts confirmed the diagnosis. After 33 months of therapy, her cerebrospinal fluid guanidinoacetate level decreased from 47 to 5.3 times the normal level. Brain creatine by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy increased by >75% but did not normalize in the basal ganglia and white matter after 3 years of therapy. Additional treatment with sodium benzoate for 17 months did not further improve plasma guanidinoacetate levels, which questions the relevance of this therapy. CONCLUSION: Treatment did not improve moderate intellectual disability or normalize guanidinoacetate accumulation in the central nervous system.