Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 13 de 13
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
3.
Med Confl Surviv ; 23(4): 249-58, 2007.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17987977

RESUMEN

All the nuclear-weapon states are working to develop new nuclear-weapon systems and upgrade their existing ones. Although the US Congress has recently blocked further development of small nuclear weapons and earth-penetrating nuclear weapons, the United States is planning a range of new warheads under the Reliable Replacement Warhead programme, and renewing its nuclear weapons infrastructure. The United Kingdom is spending 1 billion pounds sterling on updating the Atomic Weapons Establishment at Aldermaston, and about 20 billion pounds sterling on replacing its Vanguard submarines and maintaining its Trident warhead stockpile. The US has withdrawn from the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty and plans to install missile defence systems in Poland and the Czech Republic; Russia threatens to upgrade its nuclear countermeasures. The nuclear-weapon states should comply with their obligations under Article VI of the Non-Proliferation Treaty, as summarised in the 13-point plan agreed at the 2000 NPT Review Conference, and they should negotiate a Nuclear Weapons Convention.


Asunto(s)
Cooperación Internacional , Guerra Nuclear/prevención & control , Armas Nucleares/legislación & jurisprudencia , Política Pública , Responsabilidad Social , Humanos , Obligaciones Morales , Negociación , Guerra Nuclear/ética , Armas Nucleares/ética , Ceniza Radiactiva , Reino Unido , Estados Unidos
4.
Med Confl Surviv ; 23(4): 259-66, 2007.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17987978

RESUMEN

Climate change and nuclear war are currently the most dangerous challenges to human civilisation and survival. The effects of climate change are now sufficient to persuade many governments to take effective measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Today there are about 27,000 nuclear warheads, many at least ten times more powerful than the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombs, and a meaningful medical response to a nuclear attack is impossible. Nevertheless, the threat of nuclear war does not raise public concern, and indeed the nuclear-weapon states are upgrading their capability. The only effective preventive measure is the abolition of nuclear weapons. Steps towards this include: a Fissile Material Cut-off Treaty, for the nuclear weapon states to observe their obligations under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, and for the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty to enter into force. The ultimate need is for a Nuclear Weapons Convention; International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War have launched an International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear weapons (ICAN) to promote a NWC.


Asunto(s)
Cooperación Internacional , Guerra Nuclear/prevención & control , Armas Nucleares/legislación & jurisprudencia , Centrales Eléctricas , Política Pública , Responsabilidad Social , Humanos , Obligaciones Morales , Negociación , Guerra Nuclear/ética , Guerra Nuclear/legislación & jurisprudencia , Armas Nucleares/ética , Rol del Médico , Riesgo
5.
Med Confl Surviv ; 23(4): 267-81, 2007.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17987979

RESUMEN

Abolishing the threat of nuclear war requires the outlawing of nuclear weapons and dismantling current nuclear weapon stockpiles, but also depends on eliminating access to fissile material (nuclear weapon fuel). The near-universal use of weapons-grade, highly enriched uranium (HEU) to produce radiopharmaceuticals is a significant proliferation hazard. Health professionals have a strategic opportunity and obligation to progress the elimination of medically-related commerce in HEU, closing one of the most vulnerable pathways to the much-feared 'terrorist bomb'.


Asunto(s)
Cooperación Internacional , Medicina Nuclear/ética , Guerra Nuclear/prevención & control , Armas Nucleares/legislación & jurisprudencia , Política Pública , Radiofármacos , Responsabilidad Social , Códigos de Ética , Humanos , Obligaciones Morales , Medicina Nuclear/educación , Reactores Nucleares , Guerra Nuclear/ética , Armas Nucleares/ética , Rol del Médico , Radioisótopos/provisión & distribución , Generadores de Radionúclidos , Radiofármacos/provisión & distribución , Terrorismo/prevención & control , Compuestos de Uranio/provisión & distribución
8.
Genome Biol ; 6(9): 118, 2005.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16168089

RESUMEN

Our bright young biologists should start thinking now about the ethical issues of what we can do and will be able to do in the future.


Asunto(s)
Guerra Nuclear/ética , Guerra Nuclear/historia , Historia del Siglo XX , Física/ética , Física/historia , Segunda Guerra Mundial
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA