Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 22
Filtrar
1.
Rev. bras. parasitol. vet ; 31(3): e008722, 2022. tab
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS, VETINDEX | ID: biblio-1394892

RESUMEN

Abstract This study evaluated the economic impact of gastrointestinal nematode (GIN) infection in Morada Nova lambs under different parasite chemical control conditions. For this, 246 lambs, in the rainy and dry season, were randomized into groups according to their anthelmintic treatment with levamisole: control (CT: no treatment); routine treatment (RT: treated every 42 days); and targeted selective treatment (TST: treated according to the average daily weight gain, DWG). From 63 days of age (D63) to D210, the lambs were weighed and monitored for GIN infection parameters. Spending on anthelmintics in the production system was 1.3% of the total economic result. The economic result per animal (R$ 5.00 = US$ 1.00) was higher in the RT group, amounting to US$ 6.60 in the rainy and US$ 5.69 in the dry season, due to higher DWG. Thus, RT presented economic results 14.4% and 10.9% higher than CT, and 7.2% and 1.9% higher than TST, in the rainy and dry season, respectively. However, fast development of resistance made RT unfeasible. Here, the economic impact of GIN infection on a national scale is discussed, demonstrating its importance and the impossibility of profitable and sustainable sheep production without adequate control.


Resumo Este estudo avaliou o impacto econômico da infecção por nematoides gastrintestinais (NGI), em cordeiros Morada Nova, sob diferentes condições de controle químico dos parasitas. Para isso, 246 cordeiros, na estação chuvosa e seca, foram randomizados em grupos de acordo com o tratamento com levamisol: controle (TC: sem tratamento); tratamento rotineiro (TR: tratado a cada 42 dias); e tratamento seletivo direcionado (TST: tratado de acordo com o ganho de peso médio diário, GMD). Dos 63 dias de idade (D63) ao D210, os cordeiros foram pesados ​​e monitorados quanto aos parâmetros de infecção por NGI. O gasto com anti-helmínticos no sistema produtivo foi de 1,3% do resultado econômico total. O resultado econômico por animal (R$ 5,00 = US$ 1,00) foi maior no grupo RT, totalizando US$ 6,60 na estação chuvosa e US$ 5,69 na seca, devido ao maior GMD. Assim, o RT apresentou resultados econômicos 14,4% e 10,9% superiores ao TC, e 7,2% e 1,9% superiores ao TST, no período chuvoso e seco, respectivamente. Entretanto o rápido desenvolvimento de resistência inviabiliza o TR. O impacto econômico da infecção por NGI em escala nacional são aqui discutidos, demonstrando sua importância e a impossibilidade de uma ovinocultura lucrativa e sustentável sem o controle adequado.


Asunto(s)
Animales , Masculino , Femenino , Enfermedades de las Ovejas/economía , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/veterinaria , Helmintiasis Animal/economía , Infecciones por Nematodos/veterinaria , Recuento de Huevos de Parásitos/veterinaria , Enfermedades de las Ovejas/tratamiento farmacológico , Vitamina B 12/administración & dosificación , Brasil , Ovinos/parasitología , Pérdida de Peso , Levamisol/administración & dosificación , Heces/parasitología , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/tratamiento farmacológico , Helmintiasis Animal/tratamiento farmacológico , Hematócrito/veterinaria , Inyecciones/veterinaria , Antihelmínticos/administración & dosificación , Infecciones por Nematodos/tratamiento farmacológico
2.
Trop Anim Health Prod ; 51(3): 555-563, 2019 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30426339

RESUMEN

Anthelmintic treatment is the most common way of controlling nematode infections in ruminants even though several countries have reported anthelmintic resistance (AR), resulting in limitation for sustainable small ruminant production. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the knowledge of resource-poor sheep farmers in Limpopo province of South Africa on the use of anthelmintics. A questionnaire regarding helminthosis control practices was administered to small ruminant farmers in five districts of Limpopo province namely Capricorn, Sekhukhune, Waterberg, Vhembe, and Mopani. A total of 77 resource-poor farmers were interviewed between June and August of 2017 using a structured questionnaire with a combination of qualitative and quantitative open-ended questions. The interviewed farmers were divided into three groups based on their farming experience (< 5; 6-10, and ˃ 10 years of farming experience). Limited farming experience was shown as one of the risks, as farmers that owned sheep for less than 10 years could not identify the symptoms of gastrointestinal parasites infection and did not know how nematodes are transmitted to animals. However, no significant difference (p < 0.05) was found to exist between the three groups of farmers in terms of clinical signs identification and correct application of anthelmintics. About 43% of the respondents were unaware of gastrointestinal nematodes (GI) that infect sheep, could not identify the clinical symptoms of gastrointestinal nematodes infection, and only 34% knew how animals become infected. Although 67.5% of farmers mentioned that they never dose their sheep, 32.5% use anthelmintics at varying times in a year. None of the farmers weighed their sheep before dosing them instead visual appraisal of individual weight was the most common means of estimating the anthelmintic dose. The above information is an indication of risks associated with possible occurrence of anthelmintic resistance in the study areas. There is therefore, a need to give training to resource-poor farmers of small stock on proper application of anthelmintic treatment and to educate them on how to prevent development of AR. Future studies on AR should also be conducted in the province in flocks with high-treatment frequencies to establish the occurrence of AR using both in vivo and in vitro methods. The most common risk factor associated with the occurrence of AR in all the five districts of Limpopo province was found to be the use of anthelmintics without weighing the animals to determine the correct dosage.


Asunto(s)
Antihelmínticos/farmacología , Agricultores , Helmintiasis Animal/parasitología , Parasitosis Intestinales/veterinaria , Enfermedades de las Ovejas/parasitología , Animales , Resistencia a Medicamentos , Helmintiasis Animal/economía , Helmintiasis Animal/epidemiología , Parasitosis Intestinales/economía , Parasitosis Intestinales/epidemiología , Parasitosis Intestinales/parasitología , Factores de Riesgo , Ovinos , Enfermedades de las Ovejas/epidemiología , Sudáfrica/epidemiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
3.
Parasitology ; 146(2): 129-141, 2019 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30068403

RESUMEN

Parasites reside inside or outside their hosts and get host nutrition and blood. Here, we have emphasized economic losses in cattle caused by parasitic diseases due to ecto- and endo- parasites (flies, ticks, mites and helminths). We have outlined different methods/models including economic evaluation techniques and dynamic analysis as a major class, used for the calculation of economic losses caused by parasites in cattle. According to already conducted studies, a decrease in production is mentioned in quantity and percentage while financial losses are expressed in the form of account with respect to per head, herd or for the specific study area. The parasites cause the reduced production and financial losses due to control, treatment and mortality costs. We calculated the average decrease in milk production and organ condemnation as 1.16 L animal-1 day-1 and 12.95%, respectively, from overall cattle parasitic infections. Moreover, the average calculated financial and percentage losses were US$ 50.67 animal-1 year-1 and 17.94%, respectively. Economically important parasitic diseases mentioned here are caused by specific spp. of protozoans and helminths according to data collected from the literature. Protozoan diseases include tick-borne diseases, coccidiosis, neosporosis, trypanosomiasis and cryptosporidiosis. Losses due to tick-borne infections were encountered for decreased milk production, mortality, treatment and control. Losses from coccidiosis were due to decreased weight gain, treatment costs and mortality. While abortion losses were encountered in neosporosis. Trypanosomiasis caused losses due to a decrease in milk yield. Moreover, only diagnostic (conventional or molecular techniques) cost was taken into account for cryptosporidiosis. Economically important nematode parasites are Oesophagostomum spp., Cooperia spp., Trichostrongylus spp., Strongyloides spp., Ostertagia spp. and Haemonchus placei. Due to the zoonotic importance of echinococcosis, Echinococcus granulosus is the most economically important cestode parasite. Losses caused by echinococcosis were due to organ condemnation, carcass weight loss and decreases hide value, milk production and fecundity. While, fascioliasis is one of the most economically important trematodal disease, which causes cirrhosis of the liver due to parasite migration, and thus, the organ becomes inedible. So, it would be helpful for farmers and researchers to approach these methods/models for calculation of parasitic losses and should adopt suitable measures to avoid long-term economic losses.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de los Bovinos/economía , Infestaciones Ectoparasitarias/veterinaria , Modelos Económicos , Enfermedades Parasitarias en Animales/economía , Animales , Bovinos , Enfermedades de los Bovinos/parasitología , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Infestaciones Ectoparasitarias/economía , Helmintiasis Animal/economía , Programas Informáticos , Procesos Estocásticos
4.
N Z Vet J ; 67(2): 105-108, 2019 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30557526

RESUMEN

AIMS: To investigate the production responses and cost-benefit of administering a controlled-release anthelmintic capsule (CRC) to pregnant yearling ewes prior to lambing. METHODS: Yearling ewes from two commercial sheep flocks (A, n=489; B, n=248) in the North Island of New Zealand were enrolled in the study. Prior to lambing, CRC containing albendazole and abamectin were administered to half the ewes while the other half remained untreated. Ewe liveweights and body condition scores were measured prior to lambing, at weaning and, for Flock B, prior to subsequent mating. Lambs were matched to dams shortly after birth and the weight and number of lamb weaned per ewe were determined. A cost-benefit analysis was undertaken for Flock B considering the increased weight of lamb weaned per ewe, and the weight of ewes at the next mating and the benefit in terms of lambs born. RESULTS: The mean weight at weaning of treated ewes was greater for treated than untreated ewes by 2.76 (95% CI 0.64-4.88) kg in Flock A (p<0.001) and 2.35 (95% CI -0.41-5.12) kg in Flock B (p=0.003); the weight of lamb weaned per ewe was greater for treated than untreated ewes by 1.43 (95% CI -0.71 to -3.49) kg in Flock A (p=0.041) and 3.97 (95% CI 1.59-6.37) kg in Flock B (p<0.001), and ewe liveweight prior to subsequent mating was greater for treated than untreated ewes in Flock B by 4.60 (95% CI 3.6-5.6) kg (p<0.001). There was no difference in the percentage of lambs reared to weaning between treated and untreated ewes in either flock (p>0.8). The overall cost-benefit of treatment for Flock B was NZ$9.44 per treated ewe. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Pre-lambing CRC administration to yearling ewes resulted in increased ewe weaning weights and weight of lamb weaned in both the flocks studied. There was an economic benefit in the one flock where this was assessed.


Asunto(s)
Albendazol/uso terapéutico , Cobalto/uso terapéutico , Helmintiasis Animal/prevención & control , Ivermectina/análogos & derivados , Selenio/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades de las Ovejas/prevención & control , Albendazol/administración & dosificación , Albendazol/economía , Animales , Antihelmínticos/economía , Antihelmínticos/uso terapéutico , Cobalto/administración & dosificación , Cobalto/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada , Femenino , Helmintiasis Animal/economía , Ivermectina/administración & dosificación , Ivermectina/economía , Ivermectina/uso terapéutico , Nueva Zelanda/epidemiología , Embarazo , Selenio/administración & dosificación , Selenio/economía , Ovinos , Enfermedades de las Ovejas/economía , Enfermedades de las Ovejas/epidemiología
5.
Trends Parasitol ; 30(7): 361-7, 2014 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24888669

RESUMEN

Global agriculture will be required to intensify production from a shrinking natural resource base. Helminth infections of ruminants are a major constraint on efficient livestock production. The current challenge is to develop diagnostic methods that detect the production impact of helminth infections on farms in order to target control measures and contribute to the global challenge of preserving food security. We review here our understanding of the effects of helminth infections and control practices on productivity and the diagnostic tools that can inform on this. By combining advances in helminth laboratory diagnostics and animal health economics, sustainable management of helminth infections can be integrated into the whole-farm economic context.


Asunto(s)
Animales Domésticos/parasitología , Helmintiasis Animal/economía , Helmintiasis Animal/parasitología , Rumiantes/parasitología , Enfermedades de las Ovejas , Animales , Bovinos , Enfermedades de los Bovinos/economía , Enfermedades de los Bovinos/parasitología , Parasitología de Alimentos , Helmintos , Ovinos , Enfermedades de las Ovejas/economía , Enfermedades de las Ovejas/parasitología
7.
Prev Vet Med ; 109(3-4): 228-35, 2013 May 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23219140

RESUMEN

Helminth infections are considered to be an important constraint on livestock productivity worldwide. The economic impact of these infections or their control strategies has traditionally been assessed by their effect on animal performance indicators or traditional economic calculation methods (e.g. budgeting and cost-benefit analysis). Because the impact of helminth infections has become more subtle and is farm-specific, one needs more refined economic evaluations of actions meant to increase or maintain the health of livestock on individual farms. This paper proposes an interdisciplinary framework that combines the developments in the veterinary control of helminth infections with economic performance measurements to identify farm-specific and profitable anthelmintic management decisions. Our framework positions individual farms' performance against performance benchmarks and is based on the farms' efficiency in transforming input(s) into output(s). We show how this positioning makes it possible to establish a linkage between input and output transformation, helminth infection levels and effects of control strategies. Furthermore, the framework allows for the identification of improvement paths that are not necessarily related to the helminth infection, but which may lead to other management improvements. We discuss the epidemiological information required and which complementary methods (e.g. efficiency analysis and budgeting techniques) can be used to make the framework operational.


Asunto(s)
Crianza de Animales Domésticos/economía , Helmintiasis Animal/economía , Helmintos/crecimiento & desarrollo , Rumiantes/parasitología , Crianza de Animales Domésticos/métodos , Animales , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Helmintiasis Animal/prevención & control
8.
Vet Parasitol ; 184(2-4): 291-7, 2012 Mar 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21955735

RESUMEN

The aim of the present study was to determine an influence of parasites invasion on fodder consumption and slaughter yield of fatteners in three different maintenance systems. The experimental part of the study was conducted on pigs farm producing in a close cycle. The study on internal parasites of fatteners were conducted based on coproscopic methods. In order to describe the relationship between following variables: meatiness, slaughter yield, fodder consumption and mean EPG value, the principal component analysis (PCA) was used. The analysis between fodder consumption and maintenance system and fodder consumption and helminths infection did not demonstrate any significant relationship. The analysis between slaughter yield and meatiness and an infection demonstrated in turn a decrease in both parameters values in the two maintenance systems, i.e. in fatteners kept on litter meatiness decrease in infected fatteners of 4.2% and yield of 1.7%. On slatted floor meatiness decrease in infected fatteners of 6.1% and yield of 2.7%. The decreasing tendency in meat content (3.7%) and in slaughter yield (1.1%) was also observed in fatteners maintained on deep litter, however the values were not significant statistically.


Asunto(s)
Crianza de Animales Domésticos , Helmintiasis Animal/economía , Parasitosis Intestinales/veterinaria , Carne/normas , Mataderos , Crianza de Animales Domésticos/economía , Animales , Ingestión de Alimentos/fisiología , Parasitosis Intestinales/economía , Carne/economía , Carne/parasitología , Porcinos , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/economía
9.
Vet Parasitol ; 184(2-4): 204-11, 2012 Mar 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21978741

RESUMEN

Subclinical infections with gastrointestinal nematodes and liver fluke are important causes of production losses in grazing cattle. Although there is an extensive compilation of literature describing the effect of these infections on animal performance, only a few attempts have been made to convert these production losses to an economic cost. Here, we propose a novel tool (ParaCalc(®)), available as a web-application, to provide herd-specific estimates of the costs of these infections on dairy farms. ParaCalc(®) is a deterministic spread-sheet model where results from diagnostic methods to monitor the helminth infection status on a herd and anthelmintic usage are used as input parameters. Default values are provided to describe the effects of the infections on production and the cost of these production losses, but the latter can be adapted to improve the herd-specificity of the cost estimate. After development, ParaCalc(®) was applied on input parameters that were available for 93 Belgian dairy herds. In addition, the tool was provided to 6 veterinarians and their user experiences were evaluated. The estimated median [25th-75th percentile] cost per year per cow was € 46 [29-58] and € 6 [0-19] for gastrointestinal nematode and liver fluke infection, respectively. For both infections, the major components in the total costs were those associated with milk production losses in the adult cows. The veterinarians evaluated ParaCalc(®) as a useful tool to raise the farmers' awareness on the costs of worm infections, providing added value for their services. However, the score given for user-friendliness was diverse among users. Although the model behind ParaCalc(®) is a strong simplification of the real herd processes inducing economic losses, the tool may be used in the future to support economic decisions on helminth control.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de los Bovinos/economía , Industria Lechera/economía , Industria Lechera/métodos , Helmintiasis Animal/economía , Programas Informáticos/normas , Animales , Bélgica , Bovinos , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Femenino , Humanos , Internet , Modelos Económicos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
10.
Vet Parasitol ; 171(3-4): 300-4, 2010 Aug 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20434844

RESUMEN

To determine the impact of anthelmintic resistance on the productivity of sheep grazed on pasture in a temperate climatic zone, 14 groups each of 20 lambs were grazed on pasture on which benzimidazole-resistant parasites had been detected previously, then treated every 28 days - seven groups with a benzimidazole anthelmintic (albendazole) and seven with monepantel, a member of a new anthelmintic action family which was assumed in advance to be completely effective in removing all established worms. Faecal egg counts and larval differentiation demonstrated the presence of albendazole resistance, predominantly in Teladorsagia circumcincta but also in Trichostrongylus spp. By days 84 and 112, egg counts were significantly higher in the albendazole-treated animals than in those treated with monepantel. The presence of anthelmintic resistance resulted in a reduction in live-weight of 2.8 kg, a significant increase in breech-soiling and a significant reduction in body condition score. Fourteen animals from each treatment were necropsied at a commercial abattoir and carcase weights and standard quality parameters recorded; there was a reduction in carcase weight of 2.8 kg in the albendazole-treated animals, and a difference in the carcase grades within each group. These measurements were used to calculate that the presence of anthelmintic resistance resulted in a 14% reduction in carcase value.


Asunto(s)
Crianza de Animales Domésticos/economía , Antihelmínticos/farmacología , Helmintiasis Animal/prevención & control , Enfermedades de las Ovejas/prevención & control , Animales , Antihelmínticos/administración & dosificación , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Helmintiasis Animal/economía , Helmintiasis Animal/parasitología , Masculino , Ovinos , Enfermedades de las Ovejas/parasitología
11.
Trop Anim Health Prod ; 42(3): 391-6, 2010 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19701689

RESUMEN

The impact of utilising different indices and numbers of index traits in estimation of economic values (EVs) for resistance to gastrointestinal (GI) helminths were investigated. Seven indices based on yearling weight (YW), litter size (LS) and ewe live weight (ELW) were evaluated under a scheme that considered individual records (Scheme 1) and one that utilised extra information from individual's relatives (Scheme 2). Under an objective where index response in YW was maximum (R(IYW) = max) economic values were US$ 0.00, 0.41, 0.35 and 1.58 in scheme 1 and -0.07, 0.25, -1.10 and -0.02 in scheme 2 for indexes 1, 2, 3 and 4 respectively. In the determining the effect of the number of index traits on the estimates of EVs, calculations were done for five breeding objectives. Eight scenarios (indices) under each objective that differed in the number of traits considered were evaluated. In all scenarios, EVs under R(IYW) = max were positive and were US$ 0.00, 0.79, 2.68, 2.66, 2.66, 2.62, 2.44 and 2.62 for scenarios 1-8 respectively. Generally, economic value estimates varied across breeding schemes and objectives.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/veterinaria , Helmintiasis Animal/genética , Enfermedades de las Ovejas/parasitología , Animales , Femenino , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/genética , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/parasitología , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Helmintiasis Animal/economía , Masculino , Modelos Económicos , Ovinos , Enfermedades de las Ovejas/economía , Enfermedades de las Ovejas/genética , Incertidumbre
12.
Onderstepoort J Vet Res ; 75(3): 237-47, 2008 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19040138

RESUMEN

The potential economic benefits of combining tactical anthelmintic treatment for gastrointestinal nematodes and nutritional supplementation with urea-molasses blocks were examined in Boer goats raised under extensive grazing conditions in the summer rainfall area of South Africa. Eight groups of nine goats were monitored over a 12-month period from 1 October 2002 to 9 October 2003. Ad libitum nutritional supplementation with urea-molasses blocks was provided when the goats were housed at night, during the summer (wet season--December 2002 to February 2003), and/or the winter (dry season--June 2003 to August 2003). All the goats were treated symptomatically for Haemonchus contortus infection when deemed necessary by clinical examination of the conjunctiva for anaemia using the FAMACHA system. Half the groups were tactically treated for gastrointestinal nematodes in mid-summer (28 January 2003). Under the symptomatic treatment, climatic and extensive grazing conditions encountered during the trial, feed supplementation in the winter dry season had the greatest economic benefit and is therefore recommended. Tactical anthelmintic treatment afforded no additional advantage, but the nematode challenge was low.


Asunto(s)
Crianza de Animales Domésticos/métodos , Antihelmínticos/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades de las Cabras/tratamiento farmacológico , Helmintiasis Animal/tratamiento farmacológico , Melaza , Urea/administración & dosificación , Anemia/prevención & control , Anemia/veterinaria , Alimentación Animal , Fenómenos Fisiológicos Nutricionales de los Animales , Animales , Antihelmínticos/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Suplementos Dietéticos , Femenino , Enfermedades de las Cabras/economía , Enfermedades de las Cabras/prevención & control , Cabras , Helmintiasis Animal/economía , Helmintiasis Animal/prevención & control , Masculino , Poaceae , Estaciones del Año , Sudáfrica , Resultado del Tratamiento
13.
Prev Vet Med ; 84(1-2): 152-60, 2008 Apr 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18243378

RESUMEN

We used a partial-budget analysis to evaluate profitability of different management strategies of three genotypes of sheep in a 2 x 2 x 3 factorial experiment conducted at Debre Berhan research station in the central highlands of Ethiopia. This involved two anthelmintic-treatment levels (treated vs. non-treated), two supplementary nutrition levels (protein-energy supplementation yes/no) and three genotypes: indigenous Menz (n=40), 50% Awassi x 50% Menz crosses (n=38) and 75% Awassi x 25% Menz crosses (n=31). All sheep were exposed to natural sub-clinical helminthosis challenge. Supplemented sheep were offered a concentrate mix daily on an individual basis. Anthelmintic-treated sheep were drenched with fenbendazole against nematodes and with triclabendazole against trematodes. Data were collected during the experimental period (for 10 months from approximately 1 year of age) on feed intake, live weight, eggs per gram (EPG) of faeces, packed-cell volume (PCV), wool weight, and adult-worm burden. Actual market input and output prices were recorded. Supplemented sheep had significantly higher marginal profit (MP) per sheep than non-supplemented sheep (ETB 33 vs. 4). Likewise, anthelmintic treated sheep performed significantly better than their non-treated contemporaries (MP=ETB 28 vs. 8). The 75% Awassi crosses were least profitable.


Asunto(s)
Antihelmínticos/farmacología , Bencimidazoles/farmacología , Fenbendazol/farmacología , Helmintiasis Animal/economía , Helmintiasis Animal/prevención & control , Enfermedades de las Ovejas/economía , Enfermedades de las Ovejas/prevención & control , Agricultura/economía , Alimentación Animal , Crianza de Animales Domésticos/economía , Fenómenos Fisiológicos Nutricionales de los Animales , Animales , Antihelmínticos/uso terapéutico , Bencimidazoles/uso terapéutico , Presupuestos , Etiopía , Heces/parasitología , Fenbendazol/uso terapéutico , Genotipo , Helmintiasis Animal/genética , Recuento de Huevos de Parásitos/veterinaria , Ovinos , Enfermedades de las Ovejas/genética , Triclabendazol
14.
Parassitologia ; 49(4): 201-7, 2007 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18689227

RESUMEN

The aim of the present paper was to assess benefit of strategic anthelmintic treatments on milk production in six commercial dairy sheep farms, located in southern Italy, whose animals were naturally infected with gastrointestinal strongyles. On each farm, two similar groups were formed, one untreated control group and one treated group. In all the treated groups, the strategic anthelmintic schemes were based on: (i) only one treatment with moxidectin in the periparturient period (February, Farm No. 6), or; (ii) two treatments, i.e. the first with moxidectin performed in the periparturient period (February, Farms Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4) or in the postparturient period (April, Farm No. 5), and the second with netobimin at the mid/end of lactation (June, Farms Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5). Faecal egg count reduction (FECR) tests were performed on each farm in order to asses the anthelmintic efficacy of the drugs used. In addition, milk yield measurements for each animal fortnightly in each farm for the lactation period were performed. In terms of FECR, both moxidectin and netobimin were effective in all the 6 studied farms. Regarding milk production, overall in the 6 study farms the mean daily milk productions of the treated groups were higher than those of the control group. However, there were important differences between the 6 farms, i.e. the increase of milk production in the treated groups versus the control groups was as follows: +18.9% (Farm 1), +30.4% (Farm 2), +4.0% (Farm 3), +37.0% (Farm 4), +5.5% (Farm 5) and +40.8% (Farm 6). The results of the study showed that the economic efficacy of an anthelmintic treatment is not a cause-effect issue, but is a multifactorial issue which depends upon the quali-quantitative parasitological status of the animals, the pathogenesis of the species of parasites, the virulence of the strains of parasites, the local epidemiology, the timing of treatment, the breed of animal in terms of genetics and production types, nutrient supply.


Asunto(s)
Antihelmínticos/uso terapéutico , Industria Lechera/economía , Guanidinas/uso terapéutico , Parasitosis Intestinales/veterinaria , Enfermedades de las Ovejas/tratamiento farmacológico , Ovinos/parasitología , Infecciones por Strongylida/veterinaria , Animales , Antihelmínticos/economía , Comorbilidad , Evaluación de Medicamentos , Femenino , Helmintiasis Animal/tratamiento farmacológico , Helmintiasis Animal/economía , Helmintiasis Animal/epidemiología , Parasitosis Intestinales/tratamiento farmacológico , Parasitosis Intestinales/economía , Parasitosis Intestinales/epidemiología , Italia/epidemiología , Lactancia , Macrólidos/economía , Macrólidos/uso terapéutico , Recuento de Huevos de Parásitos , Embarazo , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/economía , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/epidemiología , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/veterinaria , Trastornos Puerperales/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Puerperales/economía , Trastornos Puerperales/epidemiología , Trastornos Puerperales/veterinaria , Enfermedades de las Ovejas/economía , Enfermedades de las Ovejas/epidemiología , Enfermedades de las Ovejas/parasitología , Infecciones por Strongylida/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Strongylida/economía , Infecciones por Strongylida/epidemiología
15.
Parassitologia ; 48(3): 409-13, 2006 Sep.
Artículo en Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17176952

RESUMEN

Milk production has been a distinguishing characteristic of sheep breeding since antiquity in the Mediterranean area, including Italy, where prehistoric findings confirm this particular husbandry activity. In Homer's Odyssey, the description of Polifemo's sheep flock organization is remarkably similar to current production systems. The ancient roots of this tradition have grown into an important economic reality, with excellent levels of milk production and apporoximately 65 typical cheeses. It is interesting to note that the Italian word "pecora" (sheep) is believed to have originated from the Latin "pecunia" (money). Although heavy production losses are due to parasitic infections, only 250 papers have been published in the last 50 years in Italy on sheep parasites. Differences in climate, environmental factors and production tecniques may influence infection prevalence, load and pathogenesis. For this reason, prevention must be aimed at the particular epidemiological situation and not simply adapted from current schemes used abroad. The aim of this paper is to illustrate the epidemiology of ovine gastrointestinal nematodes in Italy and to evaluate the economic importance of their control.


Asunto(s)
Crianza de Animales Domésticos/economía , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/veterinaria , Infecciones por Nematodos/veterinaria , Enfermedades Parasitarias en Animales/epidemiología , Enfermedades de las Ovejas/epidemiología , Animales , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Industria Lechera/economía , Femenino , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/economía , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/epidemiología , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/parasitología , Helmintiasis Animal/economía , Helmintiasis Animal/epidemiología , Helmintiasis Animal/parasitología , Parasitosis Intestinales/economía , Parasitosis Intestinales/epidemiología , Parasitosis Intestinales/parasitología , Parasitosis Intestinales/veterinaria , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Infecciones por Nematodos/economía , Infecciones por Nematodos/epidemiología , Infecciones por Nematodos/parasitología , Enfermedades Parasitarias en Animales/economía , Enfermedades Parasitarias en Animales/parasitología , Ovinos/parasitología , Enfermedades de las Ovejas/economía , Enfermedades de las Ovejas/parasitología
16.
Vet Parasitol ; 139(4): 321-35, 2006 Jul 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16769174

RESUMEN

The interest in novel methods of controlling helminth infections in ruminants is driven primarily by the development of parasite resistance to currently available anthelmintics. While the purpose of anthelmintics is to achieve high efficacy, i.e. >90% reduction of adult and/or larval parasites in the target host animal, the purpose of novel parasite control methods is rather to assist in maintaining parasite infections below the economic threshold. The ability to maintain parasite levels below the economic threshold is related not only to the efficacy of the control method, but also to the epidemiology of the parasites, climatic conditions, the livestock management program, and integration in a sustainable parasite control program. Because of this fundamental difference, novel parasite control methods need to be evaluated using efficacy criteria different from that adopted for anthelmintics. Although the efficacy of novel parasite control methods may be demonstrated in classic dose-confirmation studies, the impact on livestock production parameters can only be evaluated when tested on-farm. In this paper, the rationale for evaluating novel methods differently from anthelmintics is reviewed, potential performance expectations are presented, and four novel parasite control methods (vaccines, nematophagous fungi, condensed tannins, and immunonutrition) are assessed based on the potential performance criteria.


Asunto(s)
Crianza de Animales Domésticos/métodos , Helmintiasis Animal/prevención & control , Rumiantes/parasitología , Crianza de Animales Domésticos/economía , Fenómenos Fisiológicos Nutricionales de los Animales , Animales , Proteínas en la Dieta/administración & dosificación , Proteínas en la Dieta/economía , Proteínas en la Dieta/inmunología , Heces/microbiología , Heces/parasitología , Hongos/fisiología , Helmintiasis Animal/economía , Control Biológico de Vectores/economía , Control Biológico de Vectores/métodos , Plantas Comestibles/química , Taninos/administración & dosificación , Taninos/economía , Vacunas/economía , Vacunas/normas
17.
Vet Parasitol ; 114(1): 51-61, 2003 May 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12732466

RESUMEN

Worm control practices and anthelmintic usage in 177 cattle farms in Iringa district in the southern highlands of Tanzania was determined through a questionnaire survey. A total of 76 traditional, 92 small-scale dairy and 9 large-scale dairy cattle farms were included in the survey. Results indicated that 87.7% traditional, 97.8% small-scale dairy and 100% large-scale farmers relied solely on the use of anthelmintics, 2.7% traditional farmers used traditional medicines while 9.6% traditional farmers had not any form of worm control practice. Worm infection was ranked the second most important constraint of productivity in cattle in the three production systems. Most farms (57.6% traditional, 35.8% small-scale dairy, 66.7% large-scale dairy) used anthelmintics with a combination of levamisole and oxyclozanide. Benzimidazoles were used only in traditional (25.4%) and small-scale dairy (32.1%) farms while nitroxynil (Trodax) was mostly used in large-scale dairy farms (33.3%). Generally, 40% of farmers treated three or four times a year and the frequency in some farms was surprisingly high for resource poor small-scale farmers. The frequency of anthelmintic treatment was mostly the same regardless of the management system. Treatments in most farms depended on availability of money and drugs and not the epidemiology of parasites. A significant proportion (46.3%, P=0.007) of farmers especially in rural areas failed to follow their pre-planned treatment schedules due to lack of money (86%) and unavailability of drugs (6.6%). Many farmers (58.9%) had used the same type of anthelmintic for four or more consecutive years and 85.3% of them would continue with the same anthelmintic. Farmers in all management systems mostly purchased anthelmintics from private veterinary drug shops and about 43% traditional and 33.3% small-scale dairy farmers mostly in rural areas obtained anthelmintics from village extension officers. Despite the fact that all farmers were aware of worm infection and the associated signs in cattle, 42.5% had poor knowledge on the source of worm infection. Small-scale dairy farmers allowed only a 1-day withdraw period for milk regardless of the type of anthelmintic used and there was no milk and slaughter clearance in traditional farms. It was concluded from this study that worm control in Iringa faces serious constrains and that education of farmers and farm hands is not adequate. Moreover, poor quality control and high price of potent anthelmintics, few extension workers, low income and low education among farmers contributed significantly to erratic worm control practices and anthelmintic usage in peri-urban and rural areas.


Asunto(s)
Antihelmínticos/administración & dosificación , Enfermedades de los Bovinos/tratamiento farmacológico , Industria Lechera , Utilización de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Helmintiasis Animal/tratamiento farmacológico , Drogas Veterinarias/administración & dosificación , Animales , Antihelmínticos/economía , Bovinos , Enfermedades de los Bovinos/economía , Enfermedades de los Bovinos/parasitología , Enfermedades de los Bovinos/prevención & control , Industria Lechera/economía , Utilización de Medicamentos/economía , Femenino , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Helmintiasis Animal/economía , Helmintiasis Animal/prevención & control , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Masculino , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Tanzanía , Drogas Veterinarias/economía
18.
Trop Anim Health Prod ; 32(6): 391-403, 2000 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11147279

RESUMEN

Data on reproduction and mortality were collected over one year from 5100 sheep and 13,300 goats in treated and control flocks. The treated animals received vaccination against peste des petits ruminants (PPR) and anthelmintics twice a year. Productivity parameters (fecundity and mortality rates) obtained with and without prophylaxis were fitted into a benefit-cost economic analysis model and run for project lifespans varying from one to five years. At a 7% discount rate, the overall benefits for a project lifespan of five years were estimated as over 15 million FCFA and 11 million FCFA for sheep and goats, respectively. The benefit-cost ratio ranged from 2.26 to 3.27 in goats and 3.01 to 4.23 in sheep, depending on the project lifespan. It was concluded that PPR and gastrointestinal helminthosis are important causes of economic losses in small ruminants in Cameroon. A national or even a regional vaccination campaign against PPR and strategic anthelmintic treatment of small ruminants are recommended.


Asunto(s)
Antihelmínticos/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades de las Cabras/prevención & control , Helmintiasis Animal/prevención & control , Infecciones por Morbillivirus/veterinaria , Virus de la Peste de los Pequeños Rumiantes/inmunología , Enfermedades de las Ovejas/prevención & control , Vacunación/veterinaria , Animales , Antihelmínticos/economía , Camerún , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Fertilidad , Enfermedades de las Cabras/economía , Enfermedades de las Cabras/fisiopatología , Cabras , Helmintiasis Animal/economía , Helmintiasis Animal/fisiopatología , Masculino , Infecciones por Morbillivirus/economía , Infecciones por Morbillivirus/prevención & control , Reproducción , Ovinos , Enfermedades de las Ovejas/economía , Enfermedades de las Ovejas/fisiopatología , Vacunación/economía , Vacunas Virales/economía
19.
Rev Sci Tech ; 18(2): 380-98, 1999 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10472675

RESUMEN

The authors discuss the evaluation of the economic impacts of endemic livestock diseases, and economic issues in control of these diseases. Particular attention is focused on helminths and on endemic vector-transmitted infections (particularly ticks and tick-borne diseases). Decisions relating to disease control have to be made by government and by the producer. Government requires information on the level of control to adopt, the extent of involvement needed, and how to fund animal health programmes (particularly how to share costs between taxpayers and livestock producers). Individual producers require information as to how much effort to invest in disease control, including information collection effort, and how to design control strategies. Economics can shed light on these issues. However, experience suggests that animal health policies are particularly difficult to evaluate from an economic viewpoint, with complex relationships between animal health, production impacts, market access, and non-production benefits of livestock. While little information is available concerning the cost of helminth diseases, many estimates have been made of the costs of ticks and tick-borne diseases at a regional and national level, sometimes demonstrating that eradication is warranted.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de los Animales/economía , Enfermedades de los Animales/prevención & control , Animales Domésticos , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/economía , África , Animales , Vectores Arácnidos , Australia , Bovinos , Enfermedades de los Bovinos/economía , Enfermedades de los Bovinos/prevención & control , Helmintiasis Animal/economía , Helmintiasis Animal/prevención & control , Control de Ácaros y Garrapatas/economía , Enfermedades por Picaduras de Garrapatas/economía , Enfermedades por Picaduras de Garrapatas/prevención & control , Enfermedades por Picaduras de Garrapatas/veterinaria , Garrapatas
20.
Int J Parasitol ; 29(6): 877-91, 1999 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10480725

RESUMEN

The occurrence of parasitic helminth species as well as infection intensities are markedly influenced by the type of swine production system used. The present review focusses mainly on the situation in temperate climate regions. Generally, over the past decades there has been a decrease in the number of worm species and worm loads in domestic pigs due to a gradual change from traditional to modern, intensive production systems. The reasons for some species being apparently more influenced by management changes than others are differences in the basic biological requirements of the pre-infective developmental stages, together with differences in transmission characteristics and immunogenicity of the different worm species. Control methods relevant for the different production systems are discussed. Outdoor rearing and organic pig production may in the future be confronted with serious problems because of particularly favourable conditions for helminth transmission. In addition, in organic farms preventive usage of anthelmintics is not permitted.


Asunto(s)
Helmintiasis Animal/epidemiología , Helmintiasis Animal/transmisión , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/epidemiología , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/transmisión , Crianza de Animales Domésticos , Animales , Antihelmínticos/farmacología , Resistencia a Medicamentos , Helmintiasis Animal/economía , Helmintiasis Animal/parasitología , Helmintos/clasificación , Helmintos/efectos de los fármacos , Porcinos , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/economía , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/parasitología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...