Biomaterial implantation in facial esthetic diseases: ultrasonography monitor follow-up.

Facial deficit diseases are corrected by biomaterial implantation. The ideal biomaterial should be easy to implant and remove and simple to be identified by a low-dose radiation and low-cost radiologic technique. The purpose of this work was to evaluate ultrasonography (US) as a technique in monitoring biomaterial status after operation. In the last 3 years, for this study we used polyethylene porosus and polyacrylamide. Our study included 300 patients grouped accordingly as follows: malformative syndromes, degenerative syndromes, and esthetic problems, results of skull-facial traumas, and whether they are treated in the early phase and or the late phase. In this paper, we describe the better 15 clinical cases for their excellent result and for their variety of US images. Ultrasonography has been shown as an excellent way to visualize clinical features and a possible pathologic process of an implanted biomaterial; it is a noninvasive, low-radiation and low-cost dose radiologic technique. Reconstruction in facial deficit diseases needs adequate biomaterial to implant and a careful patients observation, that is, both clinical and radiologic. Ultrasonography is a fundamental component of the follow up of implanted biomaterial patients.

Free-tissue transfer reconstruction of midfacial and cranio-orbito-facial defects.

OBJECTIVE: To review our results using free-tissue transfer to reconstruct midfacial and cranio-orbito-facial defects. DESIGN: Case series. SETTING: The University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City. PATIENTS: Fourteen of 21 patients had defects that resulted from ablative oncologic surgery; six had severe mid-facial trauma; and one had Romberg's disease. INTERVENTIONS: Four latissimus dorsi, 11 rectus abdominis, three scapula, and four forearm free-tissue transfer flaps were used. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Adequate flap separation of vital structures (intracranial contents and carotid artery) from the sinonasal or oropharyngeal cavities; restoration of palatal competence, oral diet, and speech intelligibility; maxillary dental rehabilitation; aesthetic results; complications; and the patient's return to social activities outside the home after surgery. RESULTS: The intracranial contents (six cases) or carotid artery (four cases) were protected from sinonasal or oropharyngeal contamination by the reconstructive flap in all cases in which this was required. Functional closure of the palate with the flap or a prosthesis was possible in 12 of the 13 patients with a palatal defect; seven of these 13 patients have had full maxillary dental rehabilitation. Twenty patients take an oral diet. Sixteen patients have normal or easily understood speech. Fourteen patients engage in social activities outside the home, and eight have returned to full-time employment. No vascular flap failures occurred in this series. CONCLUSIONS: The use of free-tissue transfer flaps is a safe and effective technique for repairing large midfacial and cranio-orbito-facial defects resulting from ablative oncologic surgery or trauma.