Left atrial compression by a large hiatal hernia: A rare cause of cardiac dysfunction.

Symptomatic hiatal hernia (HH) is most often revealed by gastroesophageal reflux disease, but there are atypical presentations some of which are life-threatening. We report the case of a 57-year-old woman brought to the emergency department with isolated shortness of breath for 24 h. Initial explorations revealed unexplained hyperlactatemia (6.4 mmol/L) without clinical or biological evidence of hypovolemia, distributive, obstructive or cardiogenic shock. Two hours after admission, we observed a decreased of blood pressure and an increase of lactate level to 7.9 mmol/L. A bedside echocardiography revealed an extra-cardiac left atrial compression and thoracoabdominal computed tomography showed a large sliding HH compressing the left atrium. After an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy permitting the aspiration of gastric contents, a repair surgery was performed without complications and patient was discharge three days later. Emergency physicians should be aware that HH can be a rare cause of cardiac symptoms by heart compression and certainly use echocardiography for unexplained hemodynamic failure.

Hiatal hernia as a rare cause of cardiac complications - case based review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: Hiatal hernia (HH) is a condition which refers to the protrusion of an intraabdominal organ in the thorax cavity throughan oesophageal hiatus of the diaphragm. Sliding HH is usually associated with non-specific symptoms, including heartburn, regurgitation or epigastric pain. Importantly, true paraesophageal hernia may lead to cardiac compression. Knowledge of cardiac manifestations of HH is limited. OBJECTIVE: The main aim of the study is to present the rare case of a patient with gastrothorax due to hiatal hernia which caused cardiac arrest, and to provide a literature-based review of the cardiac aspects of hiatal hernia. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE STATE OF KNOWLEDGE: Patients with paraesophageal hernia may experience arrhythmia, including sinus tachycardia, atrial flutter, atrial fibrillation, supraventricular extrasystole and ventricular tachycardia, as well as left bundle branch block, atrioventricular conduction block and electrocardiographic changes in the ST-segment and T-wave. In echocardiograph, HH may appear as an extracardiac posterior mass encroaching on the left atrial cavity, mimicking the left atrial mass. Rarel, HH may be manifested as tension gastrothorax leading cardiac arrest. In such a case, timely diagnosis and instant adequate treatment of the underlying condition are crucial. CONCLUSIONS: Hiatal hernia should be considered as a possible cause of arrhythmia and changes in ST-T pattern, particularly if symptoms occurred after a meal. Differential diagnosis of the posterior mediastinal mass or intracardiac mass should include hiatal hernia. Gastrothorax is a rare condition associated with hiatal hernia which may lead to cardiac arrest. However, even timely recognition and therapy of gastrothorax does not ensure a positive clinical outcome.

High-resolution manometry features of paraesophageal hernia.

BACKGROUND: Paraesophageal hernias (PEH) can be associated with obstructive symptoms, but high-resolution manometry (HRM) characteristics have not been described in detail. METHODS: HRM studies of confirmed PEH patients (n = 60, 66.3 ± 1.5 years, 76.7% F), axial hernias (n = 125, 56.1 ± 1.1 years, 58.4% F), and healthy controls (n = 20, 27.9 ± 0.7 years, 45% F) were analyzed. Axial hernias (type 1) were compared to PEH subtyped as isolated PEH (type 2), PEH with axial hernia (type 3), PEH with herniated abdominal organs (type 4), and unknown. Distal contractile integral (DCI), esophageal length, lower esophageal sphincter pressures (LESP), EGJ contractile integral (EGJ-CI), and integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) were extracted. Intra-luminal pressures were measured proximal (intrabolus pressure, IBP) and distal (intragastric pressure, IGP) to EGJ. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to characterize esophageal and EGJ motor physiology in PEH. KEY RESULTS: PEH patients had LESP and EGJ-CI similar to controls; axial hernia patients had lower LESP. While IRP was within normal limits, PEH had elevated IBP and IGP, and shorter esophageal length compared to axial hernia and normal controls (P ≤ .0001 across groups). Short esophageal length was consistent across PEH subtypes (P = .06). On multivariate regression analysis, IBP remained an independent predictor of PEH (P < .0001). Within PEH subtypes, gastric pressure was higher when axial HH was also present, in contrast to isolated PEH (P = .03); other metrics did not differ. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Luminal pressure increase both upstream and downstream of the EGJ on HRM likely represents obstructive phenomena in PEH, identification of which may support suspicion of PEH.

Computed tomographic comparison of esophageal hiatal size in brachycephalic and non-brachycephalic breed dogs.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether an anatomical difference in esophageal hiatus (EH) size exists between brachycephalic and nonbrachycephalic dogs. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective clinical study. ANIMALS: Client-owned dogs (n = 87). METHODS: Clinical records and images of dogs that underwent computed tomography between June 2015 and September 2018 were reviewed. For the first part of the study, EH and aortic (Ao) cross-sectional surface areas were measured in brachycephalic (group 1) and nonbrachycephalic dogs of similar body size (<15 kg) without respiratory or gastroesophageal (GE) signs (group 2) by using multiplanar reconstruction. Esophageal hiatus:aortic ratio was calculated. In the second part of the study, absolute EH measurements were also compared in weight-matched (WM) dogs (8-10 kg) from groups 1 and 2. RESULTS: Mean (±SD) of EH:Ao values for group 1 (8.1 ± 2.8) were higher (P < .0001) than those for group 2 (3.7 ± 1.1). In addition, EH measurements of 20 WM dogs in group 1 were higher than those of 20 dogs in group 2 (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Esophageal hiatus cross-sectional surface area (directly and indirectly measured) in brachycephalic dogs was considerably larger than that in nonbrachycephalic dogs of generally similar body size. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Results of this study provide evidence to support the existence of a specific anatomical factor that could likely correlate to functional GE alterations (eg, regurgitation, gastroesophageal reflux, and sliding hiatal hernia) commonly seen in brachycephalic dogs.

Do we understand the pathophysiology of GERD after sleeve gastrectomy?

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), a prevalent problem among obese individuals, is strongly associated with obesity and weight loss. Hence, bariatric surgery effectively improves GERD for many patients. Depending on the type of bariatric procedure, however, surgery can also worsen or even cause a new onset of GERD. As a consequence, GERD remains a relevant problem for many bariatric patients, and especially those who have undergone sleeve gastrectomy (SG). Affected patients report not only a decrease in physical functioning but also suffer from mental and emotional problems, resulting in poorer social functioning. The pathomechanism of GERD after SG is most likely multifactorial and triggered by the interaction of anatomical, physiological, and physical factors. Contributing factors include the shape of the sleeve, the extent of injury to the lower esophageal sphincter, and the presence of hiatal hernia. In order to successfully treat post-sleeve gastrectomy GERD, the cause of the problem must first be identified. Therapeutic approaches include lifestyle changes, medication, interventional treatment, and/or revisional surgery.

Rethinking gastroesophageal reflux disorder.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common clinical condition for which our understanding has evolved over the past decades. It is now considered a cluster of phenotypes with numerous anatomical and physiological abnormalities contributing to its pathophysiology. As such, it is important to first understand the underlying mechanism of the disease process for each patient before embarking on therapeutic interventions. The aim of our paper is to highlight the mechanisms contributing to GERD and review investigations and interpretation of these results. Finally, the paper reviews the available treatment modalities for this condition, ranging from medical intervention, endoscopic options through to surgery and its various techniques.

Trans-esophagogastric junction pressure gradients during straight leg raise maneuver on high-resolution manometry associate with large hiatus hernias.

BACKGROUND: Straight leg raise (SLR) while supine increases intra-abdominal pressure. We hypothesized that elevations in intra-abdominal pressure would transmit into the thoracic cavity if the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) was disrupted. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing esophageal HRM were included if they had adequate SLR (hip flexion with knees extended for ≥ 5 seconds while supine). EGJ morphology was subtyped based on lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and crural diaphragm (CD) location (type 1: LES and CD overlap; type 2: separation of < 3 cm; type 3: separation of ≥ 3 cm). EGJ tone was assessed using EGJ contractile integral (EGJ-CI). HRM studies were analyzed according to Chicago Classification v3.0. Mean and peak intra-thoracic and abdominal pressures were measured at baseline and during SLR using on-screen software tools. Trans-EGJ gradients were compared, and pressure gradient < 1 mmHg denoted the equalization of pressures. KEY RESULTS: Of 430 patients, 248 (57.5 ± 0.9 years, 69.4% F) completed SLR. EGJ morphology was type 1 in 122 (49.2%), type 2 in 56 (22.6%) and type 3 in 40 (16.1%). In types 1 and 2 EGJ, neither the mean nor peak trans-EGJ pressure gradient changed with SLR (P ≥ .17 for each). In contrast, in type 3 EGJ, peak pressure gradient decreased significantly following SLR (3.5 ± 1.8 mmHg vs. -8.6 ± 4.8 mmHg, P = .01). More type 3 EGJ patients equalized peak (65%) pressures across EGJ compared with types 1 and 2 (27%, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: The evaluation of intra-abdominal and intra-thoracic pressures with SLR during esophageal HRM can provide evidence of physiological disruption of the EGJ barrier.

Mechanism and Pathophysiology of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) describes a process in which gastric contents travel retrograde into the esophagus. GER can be either a physiologic phenomenon that occurs in asymptomatic individuals or can potentially cause symptoms. When the latter occurs, this represents GER disease (GERD). The process by which GER transforms into GERD begins at the esophagogastric junction. Impaired clearance of the refluxate also contributes to GERD. Reflux causes degradation of esophageal mucosal defense. The refluxate triggers sensory afferents leading to symptom generation.

[Anatomical features and biomechanical properties of the diaphragm in pathogenesis of hiatal hernia]. / Anatomicheskie osobennosti i biomekhanicheskie svoistva diafragmy v patogeneze razvitiia gryzh pishchevodnogo otverstiia diafragmy.

OBJECTIVE: To study changes of diaphragm and esophageal-diaphragmatic junction depending on age and constitutional features. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We studied changes of diaphragm and esophageal-diaphragmatic junction depending on age and constitutional features by using of 40 cadaveric specimens (people aged 19-75 years). RESULTS: Esophageal-aortic ligament is observed rarer with age. This ligament is poorly developed in brachiomorphic body type while diaphragmatic-cardiac ligament is generally absent as a rule. This is a predisposing factor for weakening this area. It was revealed that reduced strength and elasticity (especially esophageal-aortic and esophageal-diaphragmatic ligaments) is one of the key factors in the development of hiatal hernia. It is especially relevant for brachiomorphic body type, the 2nd mature and elderly age. The 2nd mature period is associated with reduced diameter and kinking of great arteries, that leads to 1.5-2 times decrease of arterial capacity of the diaphragm. Therefore, hiatal hernia repair using own tissues may be insufficient and accompanied by recurrence in persons with brachiomorphic body type in the 2nd mature period. CONCLUSION: Analysis of biomechanical data and anatomical features of the diaphragm may be useful to predict recurrent hiatal hernia.

The other explanation for dyspnea: giant paraesophageal hiatal hernia repair routinely improves pulmonary function.

Paraesophageal hiatal hernias (PEHs) are most commonly associated with gastrointestinal symptoms; less widely appreciated is their potentially important influence on respiratory function. We hypothesize that surgical repair of PEH will significantly improve not only gastrointestinal symptoms, but also preoperative dyspnea and spirometry scores. A prospective Institutional Review Board-approved database was used to review all patients undergoing PEH repair from 2000 to 2016. Patients with pre- and postoperative pulmonary function tests assessed by spirometry were included. Postoperative changes in spirometry measurements were compared to PEH size as reflected by the percentage of intrathoracic stomach observed on preoperative contrast studies. Patients were stratified according to improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1). Patients with >12% ('significant') improvement in FEV1 after surgery were compared to the remaining patient population. In total, 299 patients met the inclusion criteria. Symptomatic improvement in respiratory function was noted in all patients after PEH repair. Age, gender, BMI, presenting symptoms, Charlson comorbidity index as well as preoperative comorbidities did not significantly impact the functional outcome. Spirometry results improved in 80% of the patients, 21% of whom showed an improvement of >20% compared to the preoperative level. 'Significant' improvement in respiratory function was seen in 122 of 299 (41%) patients. Patients presenting with moderate and severe preoperative pulmonary obstruction demonstrated 'significant' improvement in FEV1 in 48% and 40% of cases, respectively. Large PEHs, characterized by a percentage of intrathoracic stomach >75%, was strongly associated with 'significant' improvement in FEV1 (P = 0.001). PEHs can impact subjective and objective respiratory status and surgical repair can result in a significant improvement in dyspnea and pulmonary function score that is independent of preoperative pulmonary disease. Gastric herniation of more than 75% was associated with higher possibility for improvement of pulmonary function tests. Patients with persistent and unexplained dyspnea and coexistent PEH should be assessed by an experienced surgeon for consideration of elective repair.

The consumption of snacks and soft drinks between meals may contribute to the development and to persistence of gastro-esophageal reflux disease.

THE HYPOTHESIS: The habit of snacking and drinking soft beverages between breakfast, lunch and dinner, which is very widespread in the western world, could be a primum movens, thereby contributing to the development and subsequent persistence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). WHAT DOES THE PROPOSED HYPOTHESIS BASED ON?: The high prevalence of GERD suggests that it is very probably caused by factors, which are intrinsic and widespread in a western lifestyle. Ingesting snacks or imbibing soft drinks between breakfast, lunch and dinner causes additional gastric acid secretion, acid pocket formation, and additional transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs) with acid reflux; the latter are proportional to the number of ingestions. Moreover, there is increased esophageal acid exposure, which can last up to several hours in a 24-h period. The majority of patients with GERD do not have a hiatal hernia, and TLESRs are the main pathophysiological factor, resulting in an increase in esophageal acid exposure and, therefore, symptoms and the disease. Overweight/obese people very frequently consume snacks and imbibe soft drinks between breakfast, lunch and dinner and they would, therefore, share according to the hypothesis of the authors of this paper. That is, the same eating habit can cause the two conditions obesity and GERD. THE HYPOTHESIS UNFOLDED: Every time a snack is ingested or a soft drink imbibed between the three daily meals, gastric acid is re-secreted, the acid pocket reforms, the TLESRs are triggered again and acid reflux events recur. The greater the number of snacks and/or soft drinks consumed, the greater the esophageal engagement of the cleaning system with, over time, increasing impairment. This mechanism may account for disease onset. According to the hypothesis outlined in this paper, GERD patients should consume moderate portions constituting three meals a day, thereby limiting the quantity of acid reflux from TLESRs.

Morbidity and mortality in complex robot-assisted hiatal hernia surgery: 7-year experience in a high-volume center.

INTRODUCTION: Published data regarding robot-assisted hiatal hernia repair are mainly limited to small cohorts. This study aimed to provide information on the morbidity and mortality of robot-assisted complex hiatal hernia repair and redo anti-reflux surgery in a high-volume center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients that underwent robot-assisted hiatal hernia repair, redo hiatal hernia repair, and anti-reflux surgery between 2011 and 2017 at the Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, the Netherlands were evaluated. Primary endpoints were 30-day morbidity and mortality. Major complications were defined as Clavien-Dindo ≥ IIIb. RESULTS: Primary surgery 211 primary surgeries were performed by two surgeons. The median age was 67 (IQR 58-73) years. 84.4% of patients had a type III or IV hernia (10.9% Type I; 1.4% Type II; 45.5% Type III; 38.9% Type IV, 1.4% no herniation). In 3.3% of procedures, conversion was required. 17.1% of patients experienced complications. The incidence of major complications was 5.2%. Ten patients (4.7%) were readmitted within 30 days. Symptomatic early recurrence occurred in two patients (0.9%). The 30-day mortality was 0.9%. Redo surgery 151 redo procedures were performed by two surgeons. The median age was 60 (IQR 51-68) years. In 2.0%, the procedure was converted. The overall incidence of complications was 10.6%, while the incidence of major complications was 2.6%. Three patients (2.0%) were readmitted within 30 days. One patient (0.7%) experienced symptomatic early recurrence. No patients died in the 30-day postoperative period. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides valuable information on robot-assisted laparoscopic repair of primary or recurrent hiatal hernia and anti-reflux surgery for both patient and surgeon. Serious morbidity of 5.2% in primary surgery and 2.6% in redo surgery, in this large series with a high surgeon caseload, has to be outweighed by the gain in quality of life or relief of serious medical implications of hiatal hernia when counseling for surgical intervention.

Pathophysiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease: how an antireflux procedure works (or does not work).

The pathophysiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease is complex and linked to an intricate valve mechanism at the level of the esophagogastric junction that must counteract a trans-diaphragmatic pressure gradient, which is constantly forcing gastric contents upwards. Surgical antireflux therapy is usually aimed towards reinforcement of this valve mechanism. The valve mechanism is made up by the intra-abdominal length of the esophagus; the diaphragmatic sphincter, the angle of His, and the lower esophageal sphincter: all these elements must be restored with an antireflux procedure. Hiatal approximation and fundoplication determine excellent outcomes in patients in whom the abnormal reflux is mostly due to the valve mechanism. In patients with altered intra-abdominal pressure due to obesity, a bariatric procedure such as a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is probably more appropriate. For patients with an altered intra-thoracic pressure such as in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, a fundoplication has been shown to be beneficial in resolving symptoms and avoiding progression of the diseases.

GERD: Presence and Size of Hiatal Hernia Influence Clinical Presentation, Esophageal Function, Reflux Profile, and Degree of Mucosal Injury.

A hiatal hernia (HH) is a frequent finding in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). We examined a consecutive series of patients with GERD diagnosed by a 24-hour pH monitoring. Based on the presence and size of HH on barium swallow, patients were divided into the following groups: no HH, HH <3 cm, HH 3-5 cm and HH >5 cm. A total of 175 patients were included: 43 with no HH, 86 with HH <3 cm, 34 with HH 3-5 cm, and 12 with HH >5 cm. Patients with larger HH had more frequent episodes of coughing and wheezing associated with episodes of reflux. High-resolution manometry showed that the increasing size of the HH was associated with decreasing pressure of the lower esophageal sphincter and weaker peristalsis. Ambulatory pH monitoring revealed that patients with larger HH had more acid reflux, in both the distal and proximal esophagus. Endoscopy showed that patients with larger HH had more severe esophagitis. Fifty per cent of patients with HH >5.0 cm had Barrett's esophagus. These findings should guide gastroenterologists and surgeons in choosing the appropriate therapy in patients with GERD and large HH.