Bi-allelic variants in HMGCR cause an autosomal-recessive progressive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy.

Statins are a mainstay intervention for cardiovascular disease prevention, yet their use can cause rare severe myopathy. HMG-CoA reductase, an essential enzyme in the mevalonate pathway, is the target of statins. We identified nine individuals from five unrelated families with unexplained limb-girdle like muscular dystrophy and bi-allelic variants in HMGCR via clinical and research exome sequencing. The clinical features resembled other genetic causes of muscular dystrophy with incidental high CPK levels (>1,000 U/L), proximal muscle weakness, variable age of onset, and progression leading to impaired ambulation. Muscle biopsies in most affected individuals showed non-specific dystrophic changes with non-diagnostic immunohistochemistry. Molecular modeling analyses revealed variants to be destabilizing and affecting protein oligomerization. Protein activity studies using three variants (p.Asp623Asn, p.Tyr792Cys, and p.Arg443Gln) identified in affected individuals confirmed decreased enzymatic activity and reduced protein stability. In summary, we showed that individuals with bi-allelic amorphic (i.e., null and/or hypomorphic) variants in HMGCR display phenotypes that resemble non-genetic causes of myopathy involving this reductase. This study expands our knowledge regarding the mechanisms leading to muscular dystrophy through dysregulation of the mevalonate pathway, autoimmune myopathy, and statin-induced myopathy.

Mushroom supplements triggering a flare of HMGCR immune mediated necrotising myopathy.

Hydroxyl-methyl-glutaryl-Co-A reductase (HMGCR) immune mediated necrotising myopathy (IMNM) is a rare autoimmune myositis that is thought to be triggered by statins and responds to immunomodulation. We report a case of a woman in her 30s with HMGCR IMNM without a history of statin exposure who had a clear flare of her myositis after beginning mushroom supplements. Mushrooms are natural HMGCR inhibitors, and this is the first case to demonstrate a flare triggered by mushrooms in a patient with known HMGCR IMNM. This case highlights the importance of reviewing diet and supplements in patients with IMNM. It also emphasises the importance of strict statin avoidance for patients with IMNM even when the myositis is under good control.

Comparison of effects of morning versus evening administration of ezetimibe/simvastatin on serum cholesterol in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia.

BACKGROUND: Ezetimibe, a first-in-its-class inhibitor of cholesterol absorption, is an effective agent for combined use with statins to achieve low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals. Ezetimibe in combination with simvastatin as a single-tablet formulation has proven to be highly effective in reducing serum LDL-C through the dual inhibition of cholesterol absorption and biosynthesis. The effect of time of administration on efficacy of this combination therapy has not been evaluated. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of morning versus evening administration of ezetimibe/simvastatin on serum cholesterol levels of patients with primary hypercholesterolemia. METHODS: In this multicenter, open-label, randomized, 2-sequence, 2-period crossover study, patients with primary hypercholesterolemia randomly received ezetimibe/simvastatin 10 mg/20 mg once daily, either in the morning (within 1 hour of breakfast) or in the evening (within 1 hour of dinner) for 6 weeks. RESULTS: Data on 171 patients (87 in the morning administration group and 84 in the evening administration group) were analyzed. A significant reduction (p ≤ 0.001) in the total cholesterol, triglyceride, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, LDL-C, apo-lipoprotein B, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) from baseline was achieved after each treatment. Noninferiority of morning administration versus evening administration was shown in the percentage reduction of the LDL-C level from baseline (difference, -1.62%; 90% CI -4.94 to 1.70). No significant difference was found between groups with respect to the percentage of changes in other lipid parameters from baseline. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the percentage of change in hs-CRP as an antiinflammatory marker between the morning and evening administration groups. The frequency of adverse events was similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Morning administration of ezetimibe/simvastatin 10 mg/20 mg is noninferior to evening administration with respect to LDL-C-lowering ability.

Are statins indicated for the primary prevention of CAD in octogenarians? antagonist viewpoint.

Statin therapy (3-hydroxy-3methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor) is beneficial for primary prevention of cardiovascular events in patients younger than age 65 years with hyperlipidemia, yet there is uncertainty about using these agents for primary prevention in octogenarians. We present the case that can be made for not treating octogenarians with statins for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. This case is built on three points: 1) cholesterol levels are not associated with cardiovascular disease events in octogenarians without overt coronary artery disease; 2) no randomized, controlled trials have assessed the role of statins in reducing events in octogenarians without coronary artery disease; and 3) statins may increase risks of myositis, rhabdomyolysis, and cancer in the elderly. In view of gaps in the current evidence and the resulting clinical uncertainty, it is unclear whether the balance of risk and benefit favors treatment for the primary prevention of coronary artery disease in octogenarians. The use of statins in this age group should be based on patient preference.

The impact of statin treatment on diabetic patients.

Retrospective analysis of secondary prevention trials indicates that 3-hydroxy-3-methyglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) reduce the risk of recurrent coronary heart disease events in individuals with diabetes. Diabetic individuals may receive greater benefit from statin treatment than non-diabetic individuals, because of a higher absolute risk. Available data are limited, although several randomized trials of primary prevention with diabetic patients are ongoing. The low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal is now considered to be < 100 mg/dl for individuals with diabetes. Pleiotropic effects of statins may be involved in anti-atherogenic or other actions of statin.

A multiple-dose pharmacodynamic, safety, and pharmacokinetic comparison of extended- and immediate-release formulations of lovastatin.

BACKGROUND: Because lovastatin is efficiently extracted by the liver and because its administration in divided doses is associated with increased efficacy, an extended-release (ER) formulation may have the potential for a dose-sparing advantage relative to the immediate-release (IR) formulation in the treatment of hypercholesterolemia. OBJECTIVE: This study compared the short-term pharmacodynamics, safety, and pharmacokinetics of multiple doses of lovastatin ER with those of lovastatin IR in patients with fasting low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels between 130 and 250 mg/dL and fasting triglyceride levels < 350 mg/dL. METHODS: The study had a randomized, single-blind, positive-controlled, 2-way crossover design, with a 4-week diet/placebo run-in period and two 4-week active-treatment periods. During period 1, patients received either lovastatin ER or lovastatin IR (both 40 mg OD). After 4 weeks of the initial study treatment and a 2-week washout period, patients were switched to the alternate treatment (period 2). Pharmacodynamic parameters (LDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, total cholesterol, and triglyceride levels) were evaluated by combining data from weeks 3 and 4 of treatment. In a pharmacokinetic substudy, maximum plasma concentrations (C(max)) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to 24 hours (AUC(024)) were determined for lovastatin, lovastatin acid, and total and active inhibitors of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase on days 1 and 28 of active treatment. The geometric mean ratio of AUC(0-24) (lovastatin ER/lovastatin IR) was also calculated for each of these substances. RESULTS: Of 76 patients who entered the run-in period, 26 (12 men, 14 women; mean age, 56.2 years) were randomized to receive active treatment and 24 were included in the efficacy analysis; 13 patients were included in the pharmacokinetic substudy, 12 of whom had complete pharmacokinetic data. Compared with lovastatin IR, lovastatin ER produced a 3.9% greater reduction in LDL-C (P = 0.044). Changes in other lipid parameters were not statistically significant. In the pharmacokinetic substudy, C(max) values for lovastatin, lovastatin acid, and in hibitors of HMG-CoA reductase were lower at day 28 with lovastatin ER than with lovastatin IR. The AUC(0-24) ratio for lovastatin was 1.91 (90% CI, 1.77 - 3.35), reflecting higher bioavailability of the prodrug with lovastatin ER; in contrast, the ratios for lovastatin acid and active and total inhibitors of HMG-CoA reductase were < 1. CONCLUSIONS: In this short-term study in a small number of patients, lovastatin ER 40 mg produced significantly greater LDL-C lowering than did an equal dose of lovastatin IR, with a relatively low C(max) and comparable systemic exposure to lovastatin acid and active and total inhibitors of HMG-CoA reductase. Lovastatin ER was well tolerated, with no discontinuations due to adverse events.

Pharmacokinetic interactions of statins.

Statins have shown high efficacy in managing hypercholesterolemia in patients requiring chronic drug treatment, particularly those who show comorbidity and thus receive concomitant medication for other pathologies. According to the reported data extensively reviewed in this work, absorption and elimination are the kinetic processes mainly affected by this type of interaction, while distribution and protein binding is only slightly modified. Products (drugs or food) with the ability to affect the activity of protein-mediated transport and/or P450 cytochrome systems, particularly the P-glycoprotein and/or CYP3A4, respectively, are expected to cause pharmacokinetic interactions with statins. The intensity of the interaction is dependent on the statin kinetic profile and the capacity of the coadministered product to alter the systems mentioned above. Modification of the total HMG-CoA inhibitors instead of just the parent drug profile is to be considered when evaluating the clinical relevance of the interaction. Interindividual variability must also be taken into account when extrapolating results from studies performed in small groups of relatively healthy individuals. Patients treated with other drugs that have the potential ability to interact with statins should be monitored.

Rhabdomyolysis and acute renal failure due to combination therapy with simvastatin and warfarin.

Simvastatin, an inhibitor of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase, is widely used to treat hyperlipidaemia. Although myalgias are recognized adverse effects, clinically significant elevations in serum creatine phosphokinase (CPK) levels are uncommon. We describe a case of rhabdomyolysis and acute renal failure associated with concomitant use of simvastatin and warfarin. Rhabdomyolysis and renal failure occurred 7 days after warfarin (5 mg day-1) was added to a chronic stable dose of simvastatin (20 mg day-1) and resolved abruptly after discontinuation of simvastatin. We recommend careful monitoring when warfarin is given to patients receiving simvastatin.

Rhabdomyolysis after taking atorvastatin with gemfibrozil.

The findings in this case indicate that atorvastatin, like other DL-3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors, may increase the risk of myositis and rhabdomyolysis when used in combination with gemfibrozil.

A preliminary report of the safety and efficacy of fluvastatin for hypercholesterolemia in renal transplant patients receiving cyclosporine.

Hypercholesterolemia is common following renal transplantation and undoubtedly contributes to morbidity and mortality due to occlusive atherosclerosis in these patients. Although 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors are more tolerable as low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)-lowering agents than other classes of drugs, their use in transplant patients has been limited due to potentially serious interactions with cyclosporine. Fluvastatin is the first wholly synthetic HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor. Because it has a shorter half-life and greater protein-binding capacity than other drugs of this class and has no active circulating metabolites, fluvastatin may be safer than other HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors in this group of patients. To study this question, 19 renal transplant recipients (age, 21-70 years) with hypercholesterolemia (LDL-C > 180 mg/dL; triglycerides < 400 mg/liter) were entered into a 14-week active-treatment period with fluvastatin at 20 mg/day following dietary stabilization and a 3-week placebo washout period. Changes in LDL-C levels were compared with those obtained in control hypercholesterolemic subjects treated in the same way. The lipid-lowering ability of fluvastatin was not imparied in these patients, indicating a lack of interaction with cyclosporine. Mean liver enzyme levels, creatine phosphokinase (CPK), and creatine did not change significantly from baseline. Two subjects experienced myalgias without CPK elevations, and another subject experienced an asymptomatic increase in CPK to > 10 times the upper limit of normal, related to exercise. In conclusion, fluvastatin safely and effectively lowers elevated LDL-C levels in renal transplant recipients.

Long-term efficacy with fluvastatin as monotherapy and combined with cholestyramine (a 156-week multicenter study). French-Dutch Fluvastatin Study Group.

Fluvastatin monotherapy up to 40 mg/day over 52 weeks in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia decreased plasma low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) by 28%, with varying decreases in plasma triglycerides and increases in high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). Patients completing the 52-week study participated in a further trial to assess whether the efficacy of fluvastatin (20-40 mg/day), either as monotherapy or in combination with cholestyramine (CME; 4-16 g/day), taken at least 4 hours prior to fluvastatin, is sustained for up to 3 years. Patients were assessed every 12 weeks on average for safety and efficacy, the latter being calculated as a percent change from baseline of lipids or lipoproteins. During the second year (endpoint up to week 104), 147 patients received monotherapy (estimated mean dose, 30.2 mg/day) and 127 received additional CME (38.1 mg/day fluvastatin plus 10.1 g/day CME). During the third year (endpoint up to week 156), 140 patients received monotherapy (32.5 mg/day) and 67 received additional CME (39.3 mg/day fluvastatin plus 10.3 mg/day CME). Statistically significant reductions in mean total cholesterol and LDL-C and increases in mean HDL-C were achieved in both treatment groups and maintained throughout the study. A significant reduction in triglyceride levels was only observed at the second year endpoint in patients receiving monotherapy (-10.0%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Comparison of fluvastatin versus pravastatin treatment of primary hypercholesterolemia. French Fluvastatin Study Group.

Following a 6-week placebo period, 134 patients with low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) > or = 160 mg/dL and plasma triglyceride < or = 400 mg/dL, despite following a standard lipid-lowering diet, were randomized to double-blind, double-placebo treatment with fluvastatin (22 women, 46 men; age 21-71 years) or pravastatin (25 women, 41 men; age 19-76 years). Fluvastatin at 40 mg and pravastatin at 20 mg were given for the first 4 weeks, both once daily with the evening meal. For the following 12 weeks, fluvastatin at 40 mg twice daily and pravastatin at 40 mg once daily were given with the evening meal. Both drugs were equally effective in lowering LDL-C after 4 weeks of treatment (-24.0% with fluvastatin, -24.1% with pravastatin) but, after 16 weeks, LDL-C reduction was -30.4% with fluvastatin and -26.6% with pravastatin. This further lowering of LDL-C between week 4 and week 16 was significant (p < 0.001) for fluvastatin but not pravastatin. Adverse events were reported by 23 fluvastatin patients and 22 pravastatin patients: 3 patients in each group withdrew from the study because of these. No notable abnormalities in levels of alanine or aspartate aminotransferase values (defined as > 3 times the upper limit of normal on 2 consecutive occasions) or of creatine phosphokinase (defined as > 10 times the upper limit of normal on any occasion) were observed in either treatment group.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

High-dose fluvastatin and bezafibrate combination treatment for heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia.

This study assessed the long-term use of fluvastatin, alone or in combination with bezafibrate, in patients with severe familial hypercholesterolemia who, in a previous study, did not achieve target levels (European Atherosclerosis Society) of low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) with fluvastatin at 60 mg/day plus bezafibrate 200 mg/day, with or without cholestyramine (CME) at 8 g/day. This open-label study comprised 3 periods: period I, 6 weeks of fluvastatin at 40 mg twice daily (at breakfast and at bedtime); period II, fluvastatin at 80 mg/day (40 mg at breakfast, 40 mg at bedtime), and bezafibrate at 200 mg/day (at lunchtime) for 6 weeks in patients not achieving LDL-C target levels; and period III, force-titration of fluvastatin to 800 mg/day (as in period II) and bezafibrate at 400 mg/day (slow release) in patients receiving combination treatment. Patients were excluded if, during the previous study, they had experienced a serious drug-related adverse event or deterioration in liver or kidney function (liver enzymes > 3 times upper limit of normal). The standard physical and laboratory evaluations were performed at regular intervals. Lipid profiles were determined from 12-hour fasting blood samples. All adverse events occurring or worsening during the study, whether spontaneously reported or elicited by questioning, and regardless of relationship to study medication, were recorded.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)