Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 2.424
Filtrar
1.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract ; 12(5): 1109-1119, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38423288

RESUMEN

Immediate drug-induced hypersensitivity reactions (IDHSRs) have conventionally been attributed to an immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated mechanism. Nevertheless, it has now been acknowledged that IDHSRs can also occur independently of IgE involvement. Non-IgE-mediated IDHSRs encompass the activation of effector cells, both mast cell-dependent and -independent and the initiation of inflammatory pathways through immunogenic and nonimmunogenic mechanisms. The IDHSRs involve inflammatory mediators beyond histamine, including the platelet-activating factor, which activates multiple cell types, including smooth muscle, endothelium, and MC, and evidence supports its importance in IgE-mediated reactions in humans. Clinically, distinguishing IgE from non-IgE mechanisms is crucial for future treatment strategies, including drug(s) restriction, readministration approaches, and pretreatment considerations. However, this presents significant challenges because certain drugs can trigger both mechanisms, and their presentations can appear similarly, ranging from mild to life-threatening symptoms. Thus, history alone is often inadequate for differentiation, and skin tests lack a standardized approach. Moreover, drug-specific IgE immunoassays have favorable specificity but low sensitivity, and the usefulness of the basophil activation test remains debatable. Lastly, no biomarker reliably differentiates between both mechanisms. Whereas non-IgE-mediated mechanisms likely predominate in IDHSRs, reclassifying most drug-related IDHSRs as non-IgE-mediated, with suggested prevention through dose administration adjustments, is premature and risky. Therefore, continued research and validated diagnostic tests are crucial to improving our capacity to distinguish between these mechanisms, ultimately enhancing patient care.


Asunto(s)
Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas , Inmunoglobulina E , Humanos , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/inmunología , Inmunoglobulina E/inmunología , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/inmunología , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/diagnóstico , Basófilos/inmunología , Mastocitos/inmunología , Animales , Factor de Activación Plaquetaria/inmunología
2.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract ; 12(5): 1202-1214.e3, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38378094

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Early recognition of perioperative anaphylaxis, a life-threatening, usually IgE-mediated, immediate hypersensitivity, is essential, but bedside diagnosis is not always straightforward because clinical presentation may vary. OBJECTIVES: To describe early characteristics of perioperative immediate hypersensitivity, with special attention to cutaneous phenotypes, and identify risk factors for IgE-mediated allergy. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from adults with suspected perioperative immediate hypersensitivity who were investigated in two academic medical centers. Multivariable logistic regression was conducted to evaluate associations among patient, clinical, and paraclinical characteristics and IgE-mediated allergy. RESULTS: Of 145 enrolled patients, 99 (68.3%) and 46 (31.7%) were respectively categorized in the IgE-mediated allergy and non-allergy groups. Cutaneous vasoconstriction phenotype (pallor, piloerection, thelerethism, and sweating with or without cyanosis) occurring within minutes (or even 1 minute) of drug exposure was strongly associated with IgE-mediated allergy (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 28.02; 95% CI, 4.41-305.18). IgE-mediated allergy was always life-threatening in this setting. Other early factors associated with allergy were low end-tidal carbon dioxide 25 mm Hg or less (aOR = 5.45; 95% CI, 2.39-26.45), low mean arterial pressure 60 mm Hg or less (aOR = 3.82; 95% CI, 1.28-17.31), and early cutaneous vasodilation (erythema, urticaria, and/or angioedema) (aOR = 2.78; 95% CI, 0.73-20.54). Late cutaneous vasodilation after restoration of hemodynamics corroborated the diagnosis of allergy (aOR = 23.67; 95% CI, 4.94-205.09). The best-fit model including three readily available variables (cutaneous phenotype involving the three modalities [reference lack of cutaneous signs], low mean arterial pressure, and low end-tidal carbon dioxide) had an area under the curve of 0.91. CONCLUSIONS: Cutaneous vasoconstriction phenotype is associated with the strongest risk of life-threatening allergy and thus may be regarded as pathognomonic of perioperative IgE-mediated anaphylaxis.


Asunto(s)
Inmunoglobulina E , Periodo Perioperatorio , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inmunoglobulina E/sangre , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto , Anciano , Factores de Riesgo , Anafilaxia/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/inmunología , Vasoconstricción
3.
Eur J Epidemiol ; 39(3): 289-298, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38316709

RESUMEN

The association between having older siblings and decreased risk for atopic symptoms is well-established. This has been interpreted as evidence for the microbiota hypothesis, i.e. that increased early-childhood microbial exposure caused by siblings protects from immune hypersensitivities. However, possible confounders of the association have received little attention. We used register data on Finnish cohorts born in 1995-2004 (N = 559,077) to assess medication purchases for atopic diseases: antihistamines, eczema medication, asthma medication and Epinephrine. We modelled the probability of atopic medication purchases at ages 0-15 by birth order controlling for important observed confounders and all unobserved genetic and environmental characteristics shared by siblings in a within-family fixed effects model. We further studied medication purchases among first-borns according to the age difference with younger siblings to assess whether having younger siblings in early childhood is beneficial. Having older siblings was associated with a lower probability of atopic medication purchases. Compared to first-borns, the probability was 10-20% lower among second-borns, 20-40% lower among third-borns, and 30-70% lower among subsequent children, depending on medication type. Confounding accounted for up to 75% of these differences, particularly for asthma and eczema medication, but significant differences by birth order remained across all medication types. Among first-borns, a smaller age difference with younger siblings was related to a lower likelihood of atopic medication use. Our results, based on designs that account for unobserved confounding, show that exposure to siblings in early childhood, protects from atopic diseases, and thus strongly support the microbiota hypothesis.


Asunto(s)
Asma , Eccema , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata , Hipersensibilidad , Humanos , Preescolar , Adulto , Hermanos , Hipersensibilidad/complicaciones , Eccema/epidemiología , Eccema/prevención & control , Eccema/etiología , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/complicaciones , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/epidemiología , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Asma/epidemiología , Asma/prevención & control , Factores de Riesgo
4.
Pediatr Allergy Immunol ; 35(2): e14097, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38404118

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Local anesthetic (LA) drugs are commonly used in clinical practice to provide effective analgesia, including in dentistry and minor surgical procedures. The perception of a high risk of allergy in daily applications leads to the referral of atopic patients and those with other drug allergies to allergy clinics for the evaluation of allergic reactions to LA. The aim of this study was to determine who should be referred to the allergy clinic for LA allergy testing, assess the frequency of LA allergy in pediatric patients, and identify the negative predictive value of skin tests in diagnosis. METHODS: January 2017-July 2023, the clinical and laboratory data, as well as the results of drug allergy tests, of patients referred to our pediatric allergy clinic by dentists and physicians performing minor surgical procedures with suspected LA allergy were retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS: Our study included a total of 153 patients, comprising 84 girls (54.9%) and 69 boys (45.1%), with a mean age of 8.9 (±3.3) years. The most common reason for referral was a history of non-LA drug allergies (n = 66, 43.2%), followed by asthma (n = 25, 16.3%). Hypersensitivity reactions (HRs) with LA were most commonly associated with articaine (n = 7, 4.8%), followed by lidocaine (n = 6, 4.1%). When intradermal tests were evaluated, 17 patients (11.1%) had a positive test result. The positivity for lidocaine was 70.6% (n = 12), and prilocaine was 29.4% (n = 5). Subcutaneous provocation was administered to 109 patients (71.2%), and one patient exhibited local erythema and swelling with prilocaine. CONCLUSION: Although LA allergy is a rare occurrence, consultations of this nature are frequently requested from allergy clinics in real life. Considering the negative predictive value of skin tests performed with LA drugs, the reaction rate appears to be low in patients with atopy or other drug allergies. It is crucial for all relevant healthcare professionals to be knowledgeable about the appropriate approach to suspected LA allergies to avoid unnecessary tests. To the best of our knowledge, our study is the most comprehensive work in the literature that evaluates the results of diagnostic tests in children referred with a suspicion of LA allergy.


Asunto(s)
Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata , Masculino , Femenino , Humanos , Niño , Anestésicos Locales/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/epidemiología , Lidocaína/efectos adversos , Pruebas Cutáneas , Prilocaína , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/diagnóstico , Pruebas Diagnósticas de Rutina
6.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract ; 12(4): 998-1005.e3, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38070772

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Carboplatin administration poses a risk of immediate hypersensitivity reactions (IHRs) that tend to increase with repeated administration and are mostly IgE-mediated. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the usefulness of carboplatin-prescreening intradermal skin tests (IDTs). METHODS: Carboplatin-prescreening IDTs were routinely conducted in patients with a history of receiving six or more carboplatin cycles beginning in January 2021. The primary objective was to assess disparities in the incidence of unanticipated IHRs to carboplatin administration. We compared patients in the intervention group (from 2021 to 2022) and those who did not undergo prescreening IDTs under the same conditions (preintervention group, from 2019 to 2020). Secondary objectives included evaluating the sensitivity and specificity of the prescreening IDT and the incidence of carboplatin IHR according to the number of infusion cycles. RESULTS: The intervention group was composed of 67 patients who were administered 347 carboplatin cycles whereas the preintervention group included 96 patients who were administered 464 carboplatin cycles. The risk of unanticipated carboplatin IHRs decreased by 83.2% in the intervention group compared with results in the preintervention group (preintervention group, 3.45%, n = 16 vs intervention group, 0.58%, n = 2; P = .005). The prescreening IDT showed a sensitivity and specificity of 77.78% and 99.41%, respectively. The risk of newly developed IHRs based on the number of carboplatin cycles was less than 1% (cycles 1-5), 2.11% (cycle 6), 3.90% (cycles 7-12), 2.90% (cycles 13-18), and 0.74% (cycles 19 and greater), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Initiating carboplatin-prescreening IDTs from the seventh cycle on significantly reduced the risk of unanticipated IHRs.


Asunto(s)
Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata , Humanos , Carboplatino/efectos adversos , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/epidemiología , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/etiología , Pruebas Intradérmicas , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/epidemiología , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/complicaciones , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Pruebas Cutáneas/efectos adversos
7.
Allergy ; 79(3): 601-612, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37947156

RESUMEN

Immediate drug hypersensitivity reactions (IDHRs) are a burden for patients and the health systems. This problem increases when taking into account that only a small proportion of patients initially labelled as allergic are finally confirmed after an allergological workup. The diverse nature of drugs involved will imply different interactions with the immunological system. Therefore, IDHRs can be produced by a wide array of mechanisms mediated by the drug interaction with specific antibodies or directly on effector target cells. These heterogeneous mechanisms imply an enhanced complexity for an accurate diagnosis and the identification of the phenotype and endotype at early stages of the reaction is of vital importance. Currently, several endophenotypic categories (type I IgE/non-IgE, cytokine release, Mast-related G-protein coupled receptor X2 (MRGPRX2) or Cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) inhibition and their associated biomarkers have been proposed. A precise knowledge of endotypes will permit to discriminate patients within the same phenotype, which is crucial in order to personalise diagnosis, future treatment and prevention to improve the patient's quality of life.


Asunto(s)
Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata , Hipersensibilidad , Humanos , Calidad de Vida , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/diagnóstico , Biomarcadores , Receptores Acoplados a Proteínas G/genética , Mastocitos , Degranulación de la Célula , Proteínas del Tejido Nervioso , Receptores de Neuropéptido
8.
Allergy ; 79(3): 552-564, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38013608

RESUMEN

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are invaluable therapeutic options in a variety of dyspeptic diseases. In addition to their well-known risk profile, PPI consumption is related to food and environmental allergies, dysbiosis, osteoporosis, as well as immediate and delayed hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs). The latter, although a rare event, around 1%-3%, due to the extraordinarily high rate of prescription and consumption of PPIs are related to a substantial risk. In this Position Paper, we provide clinicians with practical evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and management of HSRs to PPIs. Furthermore, the unmet needs proposed in the document aim to stimulate more in-depth investigations in the topic.


Asunto(s)
Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata , Hipersensibilidad , Humanos , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/efectos adversos , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/etiología , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/terapia , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/diagnóstico , Pruebas Cutáneas
9.
BMJ Case Rep ; 16(8)2023 Aug 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37643821

RESUMEN

Polyethylene glycol (PEG) allergy has been recently observed after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination. We present a case of a patient with a history of two hospitalisations for unexplained recurrence of immediate-type hypersensitivity reactions and anaphylaxis who was diagnosed with PEG allergy in early childhood. Subsequently, he was instructed to avoid using PEG-containing daily necessities and drugs. However, in middle childhood, he presented with immediate-type hypersensitivity reactions after taking PEG-free antibiotics. The prick test was positive for the whole drug but negative for its active ingredient. PEG can cross-react with compounds with a C-C-O skeleton as analogue substances; accordingly, the presence of a substance with a similar skeleton in the additive may have been the causative factor. Our findings indicate that patients with PEG allergy may experience immediate-type hypersensitivity reactions to analogue substances.


Asunto(s)
Anafilaxia , COVID-19 , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata , Niño , Preescolar , Masculino , Humanos , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/etiología , Anafilaxia/inducido químicamente , Pacientes , Polietilenglicoles/efectos adversos
11.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 152(6): 1581-1586, 2023 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37652140

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is no accepted grading system classifying the severity of immediate reactions to drugs. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to present a proposed grading system developed through the consensus of drug allergy experts from the United States Drug Allergy Registry (USDAR) Consortium. METHODS: The USDAR investigators sought to develop a consensus severity grading system for immediate drug reactions that is applicable to clinical care and research. RESULTS: The USDAR grading scale scores severity levels on a scale of 0 to 4. A grade of no reaction (NR) is used for patients who undergo challenge without any symptoms or signs, and it would confirm a negative challenge result. A grade 0 reaction is indicative of primarily subjective complaints that are commonly seen with both historical drug reactions and during drug challenges, and it would suggest a low likelihood of a true drug allergic reaction. Grades 1 to 4 meet the criteria for a positive challenge result and may be considered indicative of a drug allergy. Grade 1 reactions are suggestive of a potential immediate drug reaction with mild symptoms. Grade 2 reactions are more likely to be immediate drug reactions of moderate severity. Grade 3 reactions have features suggestive of a severe allergic reaction, whereas grade 4 reactions are life-threatening reactions such as anaphylactic shock and fatal anaphylaxis. CONCLUSION: This proposed grading schema for immediate drug reactions improves on prior schemata by being developed specifically for immediate drug reactions and being easy to implement in clinical and research practice.


Asunto(s)
Anafilaxia , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Pruebas Cutáneas , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/diagnóstico , Antibacterianos
12.
Allergy ; 78(11): 2933-2943, 2023 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37458287

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) develops in the presence or absence of asthma, either atopic or nonatopic. We have tried to explore the essential components in the pathogenesis of the disease, which are either consistent and variable according to the presence and type of asthma. METHODS: Non-cystic fibrosis ABPA cases satisfying Asano's criteria were extracted from a prospective registry of ABPA and related diseases in Japan between 2013 and 2023. According to the type of preceding asthma, ABPA was classified into three groups: ABPA sans asthma (no preceding asthma), ABPA with atopic asthma, and ABPA with nonatopic asthma. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed to identify the components that determined the clinical characteristics of ABPA. RESULTS: Among 106 cases of ABPA, 25 patients (24%) had ABPA sans asthma, whereas 57 (54%) and 24 (23%) had ABPA with atopic and nonatopic asthma, respectively. Factor analysis identified three components: allergic, eosinophilic, and fungal. Patients with atopic asthma showed the highest scores for the allergic component (p < .001), defined by total and allergen-specific IgE titers and lung opacities, and the lowest scores for the fungal component defined by the presence of specific precipitin/IgG or positive culture for A. fumigatus. Eosinophilic components, including peripheral blood eosinophil counts and presence of mucus plugs/high attenuation mucus in the bronchi, were consistent among the three groups. CONCLUSION: The eosinophilic component of ABPA is considered as the cardinal feature of ABPA regardless of the presence of preceding asthma or atopic predisposition.


Asunto(s)
Aspergilosis Broncopulmonar Alérgica , Asma , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata , Humanos , Aspergilosis Broncopulmonar Alérgica/complicaciones , Aspergilosis Broncopulmonar Alérgica/diagnóstico , Asma/diagnóstico , Asma/epidemiología , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/complicaciones , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/epidemiología , Inmunoglobulina E , Recuento de Leucocitos
13.
Br J Anaesth ; 131(1): 13-16, 2023 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37271719

RESUMEN

We provide a commentary on aspects of a prospective study of the epidemiology of perioperative anaphylaxis in Japan (Japanese Epidemiologic Study for Perioperative Anaphylaxis [JESPA]). Accurate diagnosis of perioperative anaphylaxis is important for research but essential for clinical safety. We evaluate the diagnostic approach used in the JESPA study and caution against over-reliance on diagnostic tests that lack sensitivity and specificity when clinical data suggest an immediate perioperative hypersensitivity reaction is likely.


Asunto(s)
Anafilaxia , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata , Humanos , Anafilaxia/diagnóstico , Anafilaxia/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/diagnóstico , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Pruebas Cutáneas
14.
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol ; 23(4): 294-299, 2023 08 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37357783

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Serum tryptase, a mast cell marker, provides clues for the mechanism, severity, and management of drug hypersensitivity induced by immunoglobulin E dependent or independent mast cell activation. RECENT FINDINGS: The interpretation of serum tryptase levels has been challenged during the last 2 years by major advances in tryptase genetics and their rapid incorporation into clinical practice. On the contrary, new pathophysiological insight into nonmast cell-dependent immediate hypersensitivity has been gained. SUMMARY: This review provides up-to-date information on the pathophysiology and recommended use and interpretation of tryptase in the context of drug hypersensitivity reactions as a function of their endotype.


Asunto(s)
Anafilaxia , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata , Humanos , Triptasas , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/diagnóstico , Mastocitos , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/diagnóstico
15.
Int Immunopharmacol ; 117: 110000, 2023 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37012878

RESUMEN

Gadolinium based contrast agents (GBCAs) are safe compounds globally used in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, in last years it has been detected an increase of immediate hypersensitivity reactions (IHRs) to them. Diagnosis of IHRs to GBCAs is based on clinical symptoms, skin tests (STs) and drug provocation test (DPT). But DPTs are not without risks, thus it is important to implement an in vitro alternative method such as the basophil activation test (BAT). We described the clinical validation of the BAT using ROC curves from a control population formed by 40 healthy individuals without previous reactions to any contrast agents and 5 patients suffering from IHRs to GBCAs. Four patients presented IHRs to gadoteric acid (GA) as the culprit agent and another one to gadobutrol (G). Basophil reactivity was measured in percentage of CD63 expression and in stimulation index (SI). The optimal cut-off with the highest sensitivity (S) and specificity (E) for the GA was of 4.6% at 1:100 dilution (S = 80% and E = 85%; AUC = 0.880, p = 0.006). For the SI with GA, the cut-off of highest sensitivity and specificity was of 2.79 at 1:100 dilution (S = 80% and E = 100%; AUC = 0.920, p = 0.002). Sensitivity did not show differences between STs regarding the BAT (p < 0.05). Moreover, the BAT was able to detect one case with IHR to GA which had negative STs. Therefore, the BAT is a useful method in diagnosis of IHRs to GBCAs.


Asunto(s)
Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata , Humanos , Prueba de Desgranulación de los Basófilos/métodos , Medios de Contraste/efectos adversos , Gadolinio/efectos adversos , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/diagnóstico , Basófilos , Pruebas Cutáneas
16.
Int Arch Allergy Immunol ; 184(6): 539-549, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36858038

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Beta-lactam (BL) antibiotics are the most often involved drugs in allergic reactions. Mild cutaneous reactions such as maculopapular exanthema or urticaria are the most common presenting complaints of BL allergy in the pediatric population. However, it can be challenging to distinguish BL-induced allergy from reactions due to infections or other reasons. In this study, we aimed to determine the clinical characteristics and potential risk factors of true BL allergy in children with suspected mild cutaneous reactions to BLs. METHODS: We evaluated children who were admitted to our pediatric allergy clinic with suspected BL allergy in between January 2015 and March 2020. Patients with a history suggestive of immediate and non-immediate mild cutaneous reactions were included in the study. The oral challenge test (OCT) with the culprit drug was performed on all patients to confirm the diagnosis. RESULTS: Two hundred fourteen (119 male and 95 female) patients with a median age of 4.9 years were evaluated. BL allergy was confirmed in 10.7% (23) of the patients, according to the OCT results. Most of the proven allergic reactions were of the immediate type (73.9%), and urticaria was the most common presenting complaint (60.8%) in proven BL-allergic patients. The negative predictive value of penicillin-G skin testing was 89.7% for immediate-type penicillin allergy and 93.4% for non-immediate reactions. Also, positive predictive value of penicillin-G skin testing was 50% for immediate and 25% for non-immediate reactions. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, a history of proven drug allergy (Exp (B): 7.76, 95% CI: 1.88-31.97, p = 0.005) was found to be the risk for BL allergy. CONCLUSION: This study highlighted that OCTs should be performed to confirm the diagnosis in patients suspected of immediate and non-immediate mild cutaneous reactions to BLs and remove the overestimated "BL allergy" label. In these patients, a history of proven drug allergy might be a risk factor for true BL allergy.


Asunto(s)
Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata , Urticaria , Humanos , Niño , Masculino , Femenino , Preescolar , beta-Lactamas/efectos adversos , Penicilinas/efectos adversos , Pruebas Cutáneas/métodos , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/epidemiología , Penicilina G , Urticaria/diagnóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Monobactamas , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos
17.
Swiss Med Wkly ; 153: 40025, 2023 02 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36800886

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Corticosteroids, which are anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive agents used for the treatment of various diseases including allergic disorders, can induce immediate and delayed hypersensitivity reactions. Although these reactions are not common, due to the wide usage of corticosteroid medications, corticosteroid hypersensitivity reactions are clinically important. OBJECTIVE: In this review, we summarise the prevalence, pathogenetic mechanism, clinical manifestations, risk factors, diagnostic and therapeutic approach for corticosteroid-induced hypersensitivity reactions. METHODS: An integrative review of the literature was conducted using PubMed searches (mainly large cohort-based studies) regarding the different aspects of corticosteroid hypersensitivity. RESULTS: Hypersensitivity reactions to corticosteroids can be immediate or delayed and can follow all modes of corticosteroid administration. Prick and intradermal skin tests are useful diagnostic tools for immediate hypersensitivity reactions, patch tests are useful for delayed hypersensitivity reactions. According to the diagnostic tests an alternative (safe) corticosteroid agent should be administered. CONCLUSION: Physicians of all medical disciplines should be aware that corticosteroids can cause (paradoxically) immediate or delayed allergic hypersensitivity reactions. The diagnosis of such allergic reactions is challenging since it is often difficult to distinguish between hypersensitivity reactions and deterioration of the basic inflammatory disease (e.g., worsening of asthma or dermatitis). Thus, a high index of suspicion is needed in order to identify the culprit corticosteroid.


Asunto(s)
Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas , Hipersensibilidad Tardía , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata , Humanos , Prevalencia , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/epidemiología , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/terapia , Corticoesteroides/efectos adversos , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/epidemiología , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/terapia , Hipersensibilidad Tardía/inducido químicamente , Hipersensibilidad Tardía/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad Tardía/epidemiología , Pruebas Cutáneas/efectos adversos
18.
Anesthesiology ; 138(4): 364-371, 2023 04 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36630143

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Chlorhexidine generally has a good safety profile. However, allergic reactions are reported with increasing frequency. In China, it is rarely reported, and its characteristics are unknown. The purpose of this study was to summarize the experience of a Chinese allergy center with chlorhexidine allergy. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent chlorhexidine allergy testing in the Allergy Center of West China Hospital, Sichuan University (Chengdu, China), in the period February 2018 to May 2022 (n = 43 patients) and included the patients diagnosed with chlorhexidine allergy for analysis. RESULTS: Ten patients who were diagnosed by skin prick and serum-specific immunoglobulin E tests were included. They experienced a total of 30 allergic reactions to chlorhexidine (mean ± SD, 3.0 ± 1.3). Five patients experienced six allergic reactions (6 of 30, 20%) during general or local anesthesia, and they may have been exposed to chlorhexidine via different routes. Only one allergic reaction (1 of 30, 3%) was recorded with exposure via a mouthwash. The other 23 allergic reactions (23 of 30, 77%) were caused via a skin disinfectant; the route of exposure was IV cannulation in 22 allergic reactions (22 of 23, 96%) and broken skin in one allergic reaction (1 of 23, 4%). The symptoms included a quick onset and great severity. Two patients (2 of 10, 20%) had been accidentally re-exposed to chlorhexidine after diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: This study conducted in China showed that the majority of reactions to chlorhexidine were attributed to skin disinfectants, and IV cannulation was the most common exposure route; in general, however, chlorhexidine allergy was easily overlooked. The potential allergenicity of chlorhexidine used for skin preparation before IV cannulation or should be considered in patients who develop allergic reactions perioperatively.


Asunto(s)
Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata , Hipersensibilidad , Humanos , Clorhexidina/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/inducido químicamente , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/epidemiología , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/epidemiología , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/etiología
19.
Allergol. immunopatol ; 51(1): 98-109, ene. 2023. ilus, tab
Artículo en Inglés | IBECS | ID: ibc-214039

RESUMEN

Anisakids are nematodes responsible for different clinical patterns in humans. The well-known human-infecting Anisakis species include members of the Anisakis simplex (AS) complex. Humans usually contract anisakiasis through ingestion of raw or undercooked seafood containing Anisakis larvae. Once Anisakis has been ingested, patients may develop disease driven directly by Anisakis larvae and/or by allergic reaction due to this nematode. The capability of inducing allergic reactions depends on the expression of specific antigens by nematodes and host factors. This study aims to resume actual knowledge about AS and Anisakiasis with regard to epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment. Particular attention is paid to Anisakis allergens and their cross-reactivity on available diagnostic methods, and defining a diagnostic pathway for Anisakis allergy. Because only a few data are available in the literature about pediatric population, we focus on this group of patients specifically (AU)


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Niño , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata , Anisakiasis , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/terapia , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/fisiopatología , Anisakiasis/diagnóstico , Anisakiasis/terapia , Anisakiasis/fisiopatología , Reacciones Cruzadas , Pruebas Cutáneas
20.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract ; 11(2): 500-505, 2023 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36402397

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In light of the pandemic of spurious penicillin allergy, correct diagnosis of amoxicillin (AX) allergy is of great importance. The diagnosis of immediate hypersensitivity reactions relies on skin tests and specific IgE, and although reliable, these are not absolutely predictive. Therefore, drug challenges are needed in some cases, which contain the risk of severe reactions. Safe in vitro diagnostics as an alternative for the drug challenge in the diagnostic workup of AX allergy would be more than welcome to fill this gap. In this respect, the basophil activation test (BAT) has shown potential, but its clinical reliability is doubtful. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the reliability of the BAT to AX and determining its exact place in the diagnostic algorithm of AX allergy. METHODS: BAT for AX was performed in 70 exposed control individuals and 66 patients diagnosed according to the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology guidelines for AX allergy. Upregulation of both CD63 and CD203c was flow-cytometrically assessed. RESULTS: Analyses revealed that 1370 µmol/L and 685 µmol/L were the most discriminative stimulation concentrations for CD63 and CD203c upregulation, respectively, and a diagnostic threshold of 9% for positivity for both markers was identified. At these concentrations, sensitivity and specificity for CD63 upregulation were 13% and 100%, respectively, and for CD203c upregulation, 23% and 98%. CONCLUSIONS: BAT with dual analysis of CD63 and CD203c is of poor performance to document AX allergy. The sensitivity is too low to let it occupy a prominent role in the diagnostic algorithm.


Asunto(s)
Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata , Hipersensibilidad , Humanos , Prueba de Desgranulación de los Basófilos/métodos , Amoxicilina/efectos adversos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Basófilos , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad/diagnóstico , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...