Clinical and quality of life assessment in patients with latex allergy during COVID-19 pandemic: Possible protective role of continuous latex immunotherapy.

Introduction: During COVID-19 pandemic, the massive use of Personal Protective Equipment could provoke severe adverse reactions in latex allergy patients and could negatively affect their quality of life. Methods: Trough a survey the study aimed: (a) to evaluate the incidence of allergic reactions in patients with latex allergy during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic; (b) to evaluate the protective role of continuous latex sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) during this period; and (c) to evaluate quality of life of natural rubber latex allergy (NRLA) patients during the pandemic. Results: 67 patients (9 males and 58 females, mean age of 45.9 ± 11.4 years) suffering from latex allergy were included in the present study. We recorded among our patients 13 cases (34.2%) of urticarial/angioedema (U/A), 9 cases (23.6%) of respiratory symptoms (dyspnoea, shortness of breath and wheezing) and 7 cases (18.4%) of anaphylaxis. In patients who underwent continuous SLIT, we observed less cases of U/A (p < 0.001), respiratory symptoms (p < 0.001), anaphylaxis (p = 0.003), hospitalizations (p = 0.014) and a lower therapy administration. We compared the results of SF-36 questionnaire in patients who underwent continuous and not-continuous SLIT with a significance differences score between these two groups. Conclusions: Our study is the first that investigated the clinical and quality of life effects of COVID-19 pandemic in NRLA patients.

[Latex allergy: therapeutic options]. / Alergia al látex: opciones terapéuticas.

Latex allergy is a major problem worldwide due to both the severity of the symptomatology it produces and the risk groups that are exposed to it. Complete avoidance is difficult, if not impossible, due to its ubiquity. Natural rubber latex (NRL) is a natural polymer that is released by the Hevea brasiliensis (Hev b) tree, which functions as a protective sealant. It is currently used for the manufacture of health-care products such as tube caps, pistons, masks, and cannulas. The purpose of this review is to highlight the epidemiological, clinical, and diagnostic aspects of NRL allergy, and to conduct a review of the literature on its management through a bibliographic search of articles in databases such as PubMed, Cochrane, UpToDate, and Google Scholar, up to September 2021. About 121 articles were reviewed, of which 76 were used as a reference. We concluded that latex allergy is an entity for which its treatment, even nowadays, is avoidance, despite having a worldwide prevalence of 4.3 % and representing a surgical complication in about 20 % of surgeries with an anaphylactic reaction and a mortality rate that can reach 9 %. The only treatment that could modify the evolution of this disease is immunotherapy, but there are no standardized extracts yet and it has not been possible to determine the safest and most effective way to apply it.

La alergia al látex es un problema importante en el mundo debido a la gravedad de la sintomatología que produce y a los grupos de riesgo expuestos. La evitación completa es difícil, casi imposible, dada su ubicuidad. El látex de caucho natural (LCN) es un polímero secretado por el árbol Hevea brasiliensis (Hev b), que funciona como sellador protector. Actualmente se usa para fabricar productos para el cuidado de la salud como tapones para tubos, pistones, mascarillas y cánulas. El objetivo de esta revisión es resaltar los aspectos epidemiológicos, clínicos y diagnósticos de la alergia al LCN, y realizar una revisión de la literatura sobre su manejo, mediante una búsqueda bibliográfica de artículos en bases de datos como PubMed, Cochrane, UpToDate y Google Académico, hasta septiembre del 2021. Se revisaron aproximadamente 121 artículos, de los cuales se utilizaron 76 como referencia. Concluimos que la alergia al látex es una entidad cuyo tratamiento aún hoy en día es la evitación, a pesar de tener una prevalencia mundial de 4.3 % y representar una complicación quirúrgica de cerca de 20 % de las cirugías con una reacción anafiláctica y una mortalidad que puede llegar a 9 %. El único tratamiento que podría modificar la evolución de esta enfermedad es la inmunoterapia, pero aún no se cuenta con extractos estandarizados y no se ha podido determinar la vía más segura y efectiva.

Eosinophilic esophagitis during latex desensitization

No disponible

Acute Management, Diagnosis, and Follow-Up of Suspected Perioperative Hypersensitivity Reactions in Flanders 2001-2018.

BACKGROUND: Despite numerous efforts to describe the clinical manifestations and the epidemiology of perioperative hypersensitivity (POH), there remains room to increase awareness among anesthetists and immunologists/allergists. OBJECTIVE: To report the findings of a 17-year survey of suspected POH in Antwerp, Belgium. METHODS: We analyzed clinical and diagnostic data from 715 patients referred because of a suspected POH reaction, between January 1, 2001, and May 31, 2018. A total of 456 patients demonstrating a POH could be queried about subsequent anesthesia. RESULTS: A total of 608 cases formed the final dataset; 208 had a non-life-threatening reaction and 400 a life-threatening reaction. In life-threatening reactions, hypotension was predominating. In the non-life-threatening reactions, 83.9% of the patients displayed cutaneous manifestations. In life-threatening reactions, intravenous adrenaline and fluids were administered in 75.7% and 31%, respectively, and 41.3% had their intervention abandoned. Mast cell activation (MCA) was mainly, but not exclusively, observed in severe grades but did not predict the mechanistic process nor the culprit. A cause was identified in 77.8% of severe and 48.6% of milder cases. Main culprits were neuromuscular blocking agents, latex, cefazolin, and dyes. A total of 156 cases had uneventful anesthesia, except 1 patient who was inadvertently re-exposed to hidden chlorhexidine. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights that there is room for an improved acute management and an optimized diagnostic workup that should not be restricted to patients with severe reactions and/or showing MCA.

[Latex sensitization and allergy in Hospital General de Mexico surgery residents]. / Sensibilización y alergia a látex en residentes quirúrgicos del Hospital General de México.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of latex allergy ranges from 0.8 to 6.5% and is the second cause of perioperative anaphylaxis. The main risk factors are being a health worker or latex producer, hours of latex gloves or products usage, exposure to other hand irritants, history of atopy, neural tube closure defects or numerous surgeries at early age. OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of latex sensitization in resident physicians of the Hospital General de México surgical area. METHODS: Prospective, cross-sectional, descriptive study where skin prick tests were applied to residents of the surgical area of the Hospital General de México, which depends on the Ministry of Health and is located in Mexico City. RESULTS: Ninety-two subjects were included and had skin tests practiced, with 11 surgical specialties participating. Latex sensitization in this population was 11.9%, whereas the presence of latex allergy was 10.8%. CONCLUSIONS: A high frequency of latex sensitization and allergy was demonstrated in Hospital General de Mexico surgery residents, which indicates the need for policies and procedures to be developed for health workers with latex allergy, as well as continuous training of employees on latex allergy.

Antecedentes: La prevalencia de alergia al látex oscila entre 0.8 y 6.5 % y es la segunda causa de anafilaxia perioperatoria. Los principales factores de riesgo son ser trabajador de la salud o productor de látex, horas de utilización de guantes o productos de látex, exposición a otros irritantes de manos, antecedente de atopia, defectos del cierre del tubo neural o numerosas cirugías a edad temprana. Objetivo: Determinar la frecuencia de sensibilización al látex en médicos residentes del área quirúrgica del Hospital General de México. Métodos: Estudio clínico prospectivo, transversal, descriptivo, mediante la realización de prueba de punción cutánea a residentes del área quirúrgica del Hospital General de México, Secretaría de Salud, Ciudad de México. Resultados: Se incluyeron 92 sujetos a los cuales se les realizó pruebas cutáneas, participando 11 especialidades quirúrgicas. La sensibilización al látex en esta población fue de 11.9 % y la presencia de alergia al látex de 10.8 %. Conclusiones: Se demuestró alta frecuencia de sensibilización y alergia al látex en los residentes quirúrgicos del Hospital General de México, lo que indica la necesidad de desarrollar políticas y procedimientos para los trabajadores de salud con alergia al látex y la capacitación continua de empleados sobre alergia al látex.

What you should not miss from the systematic reviews and meta-analyses on allergen-specific immunotherapy in 2017.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is a well recognized and extensively studied therapeutic intervention for some allergic diseases. Every year new systematic reviews and meta-analysis provide the most powerful source of evidence to orient decision making on prevention or efficacy of AIT. We here discuss systematic reviews and meta-analyses on AIT (published January 2017 to February 2018). RECENT FINDINGS: We identified 4 systematic reviews and 10 meta-analyses. Subcutaneous and sublingual AIT (SCIT/SLIT) significantly reduced the development of asthma in children-adolescents with moderate/severe allergic rhinitis, but evidence for a short-term, preventive effect for new allergic sensitizations was nonconclusive. SCIT/SLIT proved to significantly improve symptom and medication scores versus placebo or active comparators in respiratory allergy, with various effect sizes. Oral immunotherapy for IgE-mediated food allergy resulted in substantial benefit in desensitization rates. Data on venom AIT and latex AIT, although limited in quantity and quality, respectively, suggest a large and discrete beneficial effect. SUMMARY: Although current evidence extracted from meta-analyses and systematic reviews support AIT as an effective, relatively safe, and well tolerated alternative for some allergic diseases, heterogeneity and some methodological inconsistencies represent matters of concern as they may affect the validity and applicability of their results, especially in the context of individual, real-life settings.

Sublingual immunotherapy in patients with latex allergy: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Latex allergy (LA) is a commonly observed entity for which sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) has been shown to be effective in many small randomized clinical trials. The present study was conducted with an aim of systematically reviewing the existing literature on the efficacy and safety of SLIT in patients with LA and to apply the principles of meta-analysis. A search for randomized controlled trials with appropriate search strategy in PubMed and CENTRAL was conducted. Studies with documented clinical history of LA and SLIT administered in any dose, duration and regimen compared with placebo were included. Outcome measures were symptom scores, glove provocation test score, serum IgE levels, induration following latex skin prick test, medication scores and adverse effects. Random effects model was used when moderate to severe heterogeneity was observed and fixed effects model when there was mild heterogeneity. Forest plots for standardized mean difference (95% confidence interval) for all the continuous outcome measures were created. A total of 152 records were identified from the electronic databases and four studies were finally included in the meta-analysis. A statistically significant reduction for induration following glove provocation test (pooled results from two studies) was observed in the SLIT group with SMD of -0.9 [-1.71, -0.08]. No significant differences were observed in any other outcome measures between the interventions. We did not identify significant reduction in most of the outcome measures with SLIT in patients with LA except for glove provocation test score wherein only two studies were included. Large and more randomized controlled trials are required to ascertain and confirm the utility of SLIT in such patients.

How should occupational anaphylaxis be investigated and managed?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Anaphylaxis is a systemic allergic reaction that can be life-threatening or fatal and can result from work-related exposures. This review study focuses on the assessment, main triggers, and management of occupational anaphylaxis. RECENT FINDINGS: Exposed workers can be sensitized through inhalation and skin contact, and the risks increase with penetration of the allergen through the skin. The main eliciting agents of occupational anaphylaxis include stinging insects and animal bites, natural rubber latex and other vegetable allergens, food products, and drugs. Workers sensitized to occupational allergens may also develop anaphylaxis outside the work environment from exposure to the same or to cross-reacting allergens. Cofactors at work such as exercise may increase the risk. The relevant medical records and laboratory tests (e.g. tryptase) performed during the episode should be reviewed. SUMMARY: It is very important to confirm the diagnosis and to identify the specific trigger of anaphylaxis. Component-resolved diagnosis may help in the identification of primary sensitizers or cross-reactive allergens. Adrenaline must be administered to all patients experiencing anaphylaxis. Removal from exposure is mandatory to prevent further episodes. A written emergency management plan, health and safety education, and training and surveillance should be enforced in occupations at greater risk.

Alergia al látex, puesta al día / Latex allergy, uptodate

El látex o caucho natural es un producto vegetal que se obtiene de la savia de la Hevea brasiliensis. Ampliamente utilizado para la fabricación de productos de uso doméstico (guantes, preservativos, globos, etc.) y del área de la salud, donde se estima que el 50% de los artículos médicos contienen látex. La alergia al látex es un problema de salud mundial. Se estima que la prevalencia de sensibilización al látex en población general es del 1%. Clínicamente, puede generar una reacción de hipersensibilidad tipo I, IgE mediada, en respuesta a las proteínas del látex que se manifiesta como una urticaria hasta la anafilaxia. También se describe dermatitis de contacto irritativa y la dermatitis de contacto alérgica, 12 a 96 horas luego del contacto, por una reacción de hipersensibilidad retardada tipo IV, secundaria a los aditivos del látex. El diagnóstico se basa en la sospecha clínica, confirmado con pruebas cutáneas y medición de IgEs específicas. Realizar una anamnesis que permita sospechar una alergia al látex y si se determina que el paciente tiene riesgo, realizar el estudio complementario para confirmar el diagnóstico. El enfrentamiento se basa en la prevención de la exposición y el tratamiento de la reacción aguda. Es necesario conocer los alérgenos y procesos implicados en la alergia al látex pues de este modo se podrá sospechar e identificar a pacientes o funcionarios que puedan sufrir o estar en riesgo de presentarla, disminuyendo de este modo las posibles complicaciones.

Latex or natural rubber is a vegetable product which is obtained from the sap of the Hevea brasiliensis. It is widely used to manufacture domestic products (gloves, condoms, balloons, etc.) and used in the health area, where it is estimated that 50% of medical articles contain latex. Latex allergy is a global health problem. It is estimated that the prevalence of latex sensitization is 1% in the general population. The clinical presentation can be a type I hypersensitivity reaction, IgE mediated, in response to latex proteins, manifested as a rash or even as an anaphylaxis. Irritant contact dermatitis and allergic contact dermatitis, 12 to 96 hours after contact, is also described, due to a delayed type IV hypersensitivity reaction, secondary to latex additives. The diagnosis of latex allergy is based on clinical suspicion and confirmed with skin tests measuring specific IgEs. Management is based on the exposure prevention and treatment of the acute reaction. A detailed anamnesis must be made to suspect a latex allergy and if the patient is at risk of presenting it, perform additional study to confirm the diagnosis. It is necessary to know the allergens and processes involved in latex allergy, to be able to suspect and identify patients or staff who may suffer or be at risk of presenting it, thus reducing potential complications.

Identification and practical management of latex allergy in occupational settings.

Allergy to natural rubber latex (NRL) from Hevea brasiliensis is a relevant occupational health hazard. The use of gloves and products manufactured with latex and environmental allergen exposure in the work environment are risks factors for the development of occupational allergy among different job categories. Healthcare workers have been the most commonly affected, but other professions with exposure to latex products such as hairdressers, cleaners, food handlers and those making natural rubber latex (NRL) products are also at risk of developing occupational allergy. Clinical manifestations of IgE-mediated latex allergy can range from troublesome skin disorders to life-threatening systemic reactions. It is very important to identify the occupational allergic diseases in their early stages in order to implement avoidance strategies. For this purpose, the interventions for prevention should emphasize the importance of latex allergy awareness and surveillance among exposed workforces.

Alergia al látex en el período perioperatorio / Latex allergy in the perioperative period

Latex or natural rubber latex is a processed plant-based product, extracted from the tropical tree Hevea Brasiliensis. This raw material is widely used in about 40.000 medical and daily-used products. Latex allergy is a relevant pathology in surgical environments that arose after the establishment of universal precautions during the nineties. Risk groups include health-care workers and children with spine bifida who have a prevalence ranging between 2.9-17 percent and 30-70 percent, respectively. Latex allergy occurs in a variety of ways in health facilities including hypersensitivity reaction type IV or type I. In the former, chemical substances added to latex trigger the allergic reactions; where allergic dermatitis is the most-frequently found case. In the latter, the reactions are triggered by the contact with latex proteins causing from urticarial to anaphylactic shock and death. Diagnosis of latex allergy is based on a clinical history and/or physical examination associated with a confirmatory test as prick test (latex allergy type I) or cutaneous patches (latex allergy type IV). Nowadays, there is no definitive cure for the latex allergy and its treatment is based on allergen avoidance.

El látex o caucho natural es un producto vegetal procesado que se obtiene a partir del árbol tropical Hevea Brasiliensis. Esta materia prima es ampliamente usada, estando presente en hasta 40.000 productos médicos y de uso diario. La alergia al látex es una patología relevante en el ámbito quirúrgico, que surgió posterior a la instauración de las precauciones universales en la década del 90. Dentro de los grupos de riesgo se encuentran trabajadores de la salud y pacientes con espina bífida con una prevalencia que oscila entre 2,9 a 17 por ciento y 30 a 70 por ciento, respectivamente. La presentación clínica de alergia al látex tiene un espectro amplio, pudiendo presentarse como reacciones por hipersensibilidad tipo IV o tipo I. En el primer grupo, las reacciones son gatilladas por los químicos adicionados al látex, siendo la dermatitis alérgica de contacto su presentación más frecuente. En el segundo grupo, las reacciones son secundarias al contacto con proteínas del látex, pudiéndose manifestar desde urticaria hasta shock anafiláctico y muerte. El diagnóstico de alergia al látex se basa en una historia clínica y/o examen físico compatible asociado a un examen confirmatorio, como el prick test (alergia al látex tipo I) y el parche cutáneo (alergia al látex tipo IV). Actualmente no existe una cura definitiva para la alergia al látex y su tratamiento se basa en evitar la exposición al alérgeno.

[Successful use of C1 esterase inhibitor in capillary leak syndrome]. / Erfolgreiche Anwendung von C1-Esterase-Inhibitor bei "capillary leak syndrome"

This article reports the successful use of C1 esterase inhibitor in the treatment of capillary leak syndrome. The coincidence of exposure to latex during surgery and medication with ramipril led to prolonged shock complicated by secondary hyperfibrinolysis, capillary leak syndrome and multiple organ failure. Initial treatment according to relevant guidelines failed to stabilize the condition. Treatment was only successful after administration of 1,500 IU of human C1 esterase inhibitor.

Latex allergy: Position Paper.

Correct management of latex allergy is essential to ensure adequate care of patients who are allergic to latex, which is ubiquitous in the health care setting. In this Position Paper, the Latex Committee of the Spanish Society of Allergology and Clinical Immunology provides guidelines for the management of latex allergy.

Latex immunotherapy: state of the art.

OBJECTIVE: Latex allergy remains a significant problem, especially among certain professional categories, and specific immunotherapy has been suggested as a suitable therapeutic option. The objective of the this article is to review the available literature on clinical trials of specific immunotherapy in latex allergy. DATA SOURCES: Literature databases (PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar) were searched for latex immunotherapy clinical trials. STUDY SELECTIONS: Clinical trials (either open or randomized controlled) using subcutaneous or sublingual immunotherapy with latex extracts were selected. Only articles published in English in peer-reviewed journals were considered. Case reports quoted in the clinical trials were also described, when pertinent. RESULTS: Eleven clinical trials (3 with subcutaneous and 8 with sublingual immunotherapy) were identified. Two of the 3 randomized trials of subcutaneous immunotherapy reported some benefit in adults but a remarkable occurrence of side effects. Concerning sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT), there were 6 randomized placebo-controlled (1 in children), 1 randomized open, and 1 open trials. All but 1 trial reported positive results, and the safety profile was overall superior to injection immunotherapy. The overall quality of the study was moderate, and the number of subjects studied was low. CONCLUSION: Although guidelines do not consider allergy to latex as an accepted indication to desensitization, SLIT can be offered, in addition to symptomatic treatment, to selected patients, when avoidance measures are not feasible or effective.

Component-resolved immunologic modifications, efficacy, and tolerance of latex sublingual immunotherapy in children.

BACKGROUND: As the frequency of natural rubber latex (NRL) allergy has increased, attempts have been made to diminish exposure in high-risk patients. Despite some good results, complete NRL avoidance was not possible, so latex immunotherapy was developed. OBJECTIVE: To examine variations in immunologic parameters, clinical efficacy, and safety of NRL sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT). METHODS: This prospective, observational, open, case-control study included 23 patients (18 patients receiving NRL SLIT and 5 controls). Skin prick, conjunctival provocation, and in-use tests with NRL, specific IgE and specific IgG4 to NRL, specific IgE to recombinant NRL allergens, and basophil activation test (BAT) with whole latex, natural, and recombinant allergens were performed before immunotherapy (T0) and at 6 (T1) and 12 months (T2) of treatment. RESULTS: Patients were sensitized to Hev b 5, Hev b 6.01, and Hev b 6.02 proteins, optimal for SLIT. Changes in specific IgE were not significant. Increases in specific IgG4 between T1 and T2 were larger in the active group. BAT determinations showed significant decreases in recombinant Hev b 6.01 and natural Hev b 6.02 in the active group at T1 but not at T2. Both groups had new sensitizations at T1 but not at T2. The active group had significant increases in the response threshold in the in vivo tests at T1 and T2. Adverse effects were limited to local reactions. CONCLUSION: NRL SLIT is effective and safe in children with latex allergy. Our results suggest that specific IgE determinations and BAT measurements to natural and recombinant latex allergens may allow obtaining an allergen-based diagnosis to help determine specific immunotherapy.

[Peroperative anaphylactic shock in children: management and evaluation]. / Choc anaphylactique peropératoire chez l'enfant : prise en charge et bilan.

Anaphylactic shock is the most severe manifestation of hypersensitivity, whether of allergic origin or not. In the operating theatre, anaphylactic shock is rare in paediatric patients and latex allergy is still the major cause of allergy. Whatever the cause and mechanism of the reaction, its treatment should be started as early as possible: a high level of suspicion is thus necessary to establish a diagnosis as early as possible. Symptomatic treatment is well codified. The results of blood sampling at the time of the reaction and of allergic tests performed a few weeks later will enable a definitive diagnosis to be made and appropriate recommendations (medical alert card) to be given to the patients and its parents.