Risk factors of impairment of shoulder function after axillary dissection for breast cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Postoperative shoulder joint dysfunction has been observed at a certain rate after breast cancer surgery with axillary lymph node dissection. The purposes of this study were to verify the feasibility and effects of home-based exercise using a DVD and clarify the target of intensive intervention with physiotherapy by identifying the factors that cause postoperative shoulder dysfunction. METHODS: The study comprised 237 female patients who underwent breast cancer surgery with axillary lymph node dissection, whose data were acquired until 3 months postoperatively. All patients were instructed to exercise at home using a DVD. Range of motion (ROM) of shoulder flexion and abduction and the disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) score were measured before surgery, 1 week and 1, 2, and 3 months after surgery. As factors influencing the recovery of shoulder ROM at 3 months after surgery, the presence or absence of radiation and factors up to 1 month after surgery (age, body mass index, the relationship between operated side and dominant side of the hand, treatment modalities, and complications). RESULTS: Shoulder ROM and DASH scores had gradually recovered from 1 week to 3 months postoperatively. As the results of the multivariate analysis, the factors that were associated with the recovery of ROM of shoulder flexion at 3 months were the side of surgery corresponding to the dominant hand (negative factor) and the presence of paresthesia at 1 week postoperatively (positive factor) (p < 0.05). Radiation therapy and the side of surgery corresponding to the dominant hand were negative factors for the recovery of shoulder abduction (p < 0.01). Regarding the feasibility of the home exercise, 214/229 (93.4%), 172/210 (81.9%), and 139/206 (67.5%) of patients performed exercise at least once a day at 1, 2, and 3 months after surgery, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our result indicated that the side of surgery corresponding to the dominant hand was the inhibiting factor for recovery for both shoulder flexion and abduction at 3 months after surgery. Home-based exercise with DVD was considered feasible. For the verification of this effectiveness, a randomized control study should be planned in the future.

The Impact of Radiation Energy on Dose Homogeneity and Organ Dose in the Göttingen Minipig Total-Body Irradiation Model.

Animal models of total-body irradiation (TBI) are used to elucidate normal tissue damage and evaluate the efficacy of medical countermeasures (MCM). The accuracy of these TBI models depends on the reproducibility of the radiation dose-response relationship for lethality, which in turn is highly dependent on robust radiation physics and dosimetry. However, the precise levels of radiation each organ absorbs can change dramatically when different photon beam qualities are used, due to the interplay between their penetration and the natural variation of animal sizes and geometries. In this study, we evaluate the effect of varying the radiation energy, namely cobalt-60 (Co-60); of similar penetration to a 4-MV polyenergetic beam), 6 MV and 15 MV, in the absorbed dose delivered by TBI to individual organs of eight Göttingen minipigs of varying weights (10.3-24.1 kg) and dimensions (17.5-25 cm width). The main organs, i.e. heart, lungs, esophagus, stomach, bowels, liver, kidneys and bladder, were contoured by an experienced radiation oncologist, and the volumetric radiation dose distribution was calculated using a commercial treatment planning system commissioned and validated for Co-60, 6-MV and 15-MV teletherapy units. The dose is normalized to the intended prescription at midline in the abdomen. For each animal and each energy, the body and organ dose volume histograms (DVHs) were computed. The results show that more penetrating photon energies produce dose distributions that are systematically and consistently more homogeneous and more uniform, both within individual organs and between different organs, across all animals. Thoracic organs (lungs, heart) received higher dose than prescribed while pelvic organs (bowel, bladder) received less dose than prescribed, due to smaller and wider separations, respectively. While these trends were slightly more pronounced in the smallest animals (10.3 kg, 19 cm abdominal width) and largest animals (>20 kg, ∼25 cm abdominal width), they were observed in all animals, including those in the 9-15 kg range typically used in MCM models. Some organs received an average absorbed dose representing <80% of prescribed dose when Co-60 was used, whereas all organs received average doses of >87% and >93% when 6 and 15 MV were used, respectively. Similarly, average dose to the thoracic organs reached as high as 125% of the intended dose with Co-60, compared to 115% for 15 MV. These results indicate that Co-60 consistently produces less uniform dose distributions in the Göttingen minipig compared to 6 and 15 MV. Moreover, heterogeneity of dose distributions for Co-60 is accentuated by anatomical and geometrical variations across various animals, leading to different absorbed dose delivered to organs for different animals. This difference in absorbed radiation organ doses, likely caused by the lower penetration of Co-60 and 6 MV compared to 15 MV, could potentially lead to different biological outcomes. While the link between the dose distribution and variation of biological outcome in the Göttingen minipig has never been explicitly studied, more pronounced dose heterogeneity within and between organs treated with Co-60 teletherapy units represents an additional confounding factor which can be easily mitigated by using a more penetrating energy.

Mechanical properties of the shoulder and pectoralis major in breast cancer patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery with axillary surgery and radiotherapy.

Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and radiotherapy reduce breast cancer recurrence but can cause functional deficits in breast cancer survivors. A cross-sectional study quantified the long-term pathophysiological impact of these treatments on biomechanical measures of shoulder stiffness and ultrasound shear wave elastography measures of the shear elastic modulus of the pectoralis major (PM). Nine node-positive patients treated with radiotherapy to the breast and regional nodes after BCS and axillary lymph node dissection (Group 1) were compared to nine node-negative patients treated with radiotherapy to the breast alone after BCS and sentinel node biopsy (Group 2) and nine healthy age-matched controls. The mean follow-up for Group 1 and Group 2 patients was 988 days and 754 days, respectively. Shoulder stiffness did not differ between the treatment groups and healthy controls (p = 0.23). The PM shear elastic modulus differed between groups (p = 0.002), with Group 1 patients exhibiting a stiffer PM than Group 2 patients (p < 0.001) and healthy controls (p = 0.027). The mean prescribed radiotherapy dose to the PM was significantly correlated with passive shear elastic modulus (p = 0.018). Breast cancer patients undergoing more extensive axillary surgery and nodal radiotherapy did not experience long-term functional deficits to shoulder integrity but did experience long-term mechanical changes of the PM.

Shoulder symptoms and quality of life impact of limited neck dissection after de-intensified chemoradiotherapy: Secondary analysis of two prospective trials.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the quality of life (QOL) impact of post-radiation therapy (RT) superselective/selective neck dissection after de-intensified chemoradiation for human papillomavirus-associated oropharynx cancer. METHODS: A total of 147 patients received 60 Gy and weekly low-dose cisplatin on two phase 2 trials with planned post-RT neck dissection or surveillance positron emission tomography with neck dissection reserved for salvage. UW-QOL Shoulder Score, EORTC H&N-35, and EAT-10 were assessed. RESULTS: In all, 48 of 147 patients had post-RT neck dissection. At 2 years, 37% and 13% of patients receiving post-RT neck dissection had Shoulder Score ≥ 1 (any shoulder symptoms) and ≥ 2 (symptoms affecting work/hobbies), respectively, versus only 16% and 3% of patients not receiving post-RT neck dissection. Post-RT neck dissection was associated with Shoulder Score ≥ 1 (P = 0.005) and Shoulder Score ≥ 2 (P = 0.03) at 2 years, but not H&N-35 or EAT-10 scores. CONCLUSIONS: Post-RT superselective/selective neck dissection was associated with modest but persistent shoulder symptoms. These toxicities should be weighed against the probability of persistent disease when evaluating patients for post-RT neck dissection.

Efecto del tratamiento de radioterapia en el hombro homolateral en mujeres intervenidas de cáncer de mama / Effect of radiotherapy treatment in the homolateral shoulder in breast-cancer patients

Objetivo: Conocer los efectos secundarios en el miembro superior tras el tratamiento de radioterapia en mujeres intervenidas por cáncer de mama e identificar si existen diferencias en función del servicio de radioterapia que las atiende. Sujetos, material y métodos: Estudio longitudinal prospectivo, en el que participaron 22 mujeres que iban a recibir tratamiento de radioterapia en los hospitales Gregorio Marañón y Ramón y Cajal de Madrid. Se realizó una valoración previa al tratamiento de radioterapia y otra inmediatamente después. En las exploraciones se recogió el rango de movimiento del hombro, el dolor, el grado de disfunción del miembro superior y el grado de radiodermatitis. Resultados: Todas las participantes mostraron una limitación en los movimientos del hombro homolateral a la cirugía antes de comenzar la radioterapia. Tras el tratamiento de radioterapia el rango de movimiento del hombro se vio reducido en los movimientos de rotación interna y rotación externa, además de aumentar de manera estadísticamente significativa el dolor y la discapacidad del miembro superior (p < 0,05). Las mujeres atendidas en el Hospital Ramón y Cajal vieron más reducido el movimiento de rotación externa, mientras que la lesión cutánea fue mayor en las mujeres tratadas en el Hospital Gregorio Marañón. Conclusiones: El tratamiento de radioterapia produce a corto plazo toxicidad cutánea, un aumento del dolor y la discapacidad en el miembro superior y contribuye a limitar el rango de movimiento del hombro en los movimientos de rotación interna y rotación externa. Estos resultados parecen variar en función del servicio de radioterapia que atiende a las mujeres

Objective: To identify the secondary effects in the upper limb after radiotherapy treatment in women diagnosed with breast cancer, as well as to determine if there are differences in the outcomes depending on the radiotherapy service that treated the participants. Participants, material, and methods: A longitudinal prospective study was performed on 22 women who received radiotherapy treatment in the Gregorio Marañón and Ramón y Cajal Hospitals in Madrid. The assessments were carried out before and after the radiotherapy treatment. The outcomes recorded were shoulder range of motion, pain, upper limb disability and the level of radiodermatitis. Results: All the participants showed a restriction in the shoulder movement after the surgery, and before the radiotherapy. After the radiotherapy treatment, there was a decrease in the internus and externus rotation movements of the shoulder. Furthermore, there was a statistically significant increase in pain and upper limb dysfunction. Women treated in the Ramón y Cajal Hospital showed a decrease in externus rotation movement, whereas women treated in the Gregorio Marañón Hospital suffered from greater skin toxicity. Conclusions: Radiotherapy treatment increases pain and upper limb disability, produces skin toxicity, and decreases the rotation mobility of the shoulder in the short-term. The secondary effects may vary according to hospital protocols

Late normal tissue effects in the arm and shoulder following lymphatic radiotherapy: Results from the UK START (Standardisation of Breast Radiotherapy) trials.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Adjuvant lymphatic radiotherapy (LNRT) is recommended for selected axillary node positive women with early breast cancer. We investigated whether hypofractionated LNRT is safe combined with similarly-hypofractionated breast/chest wall radiotherapy (RT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The Standardisation of Breast Radiotherapy (START) pilot, A and B trials randomised women with early breast cancer to schedules of 2.67-3.3 Gy versus 2.0 Gy fractions (control). RT adverse effects were assessed by patients using the EORTC QLQ-BR23 and protocol-specific questions, and by physicians. Rates of arm/shoulder effects were compared between schedules for patients given LNRT. RESULTS: 864/5861 (14.7%) patients received LNRT (385 START-pilot, 318 START-A, 161 START-B). Prevalences of moderate/marked arm/shoulder effects were low up to 10 years. There were no significant differences between the hypofractionated and control groups for patient- and physician-assessed symptoms in START-A or START-B. In START-pilot, adverse effect rates were higher after 13 fractions of 3.3 Gy, consistent with effects reported in the breast/chest wall (significant for shoulder stiffness, HR 3.07, 95%CI 1.62-5.83, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The START trial results suggest that appropriately-dosed hypofractionated LNRT is safe in the long-term, according to patient and physician-assessed arm and shoulder symptoms. These findings are consistent with those reported after the same schedules delivered to the breast/chest wall.

Radiotherapy for non-malignant shoulder syndrome: Is there a risk for radiation-induced carcinogenesis?

PURPOSE: To estimate the organ-specific probability for carcinogenesis following radiotherapy for non-malignant shoulder syndrome. METHODS: Photon-beam radiation therapy to 6 Gy for shoulder syndrome was simulated with a Monte Carlo code. An androgynous computational phantom representing a typical adult was used to calculate the radiation dose to out-of-field organs having a predilection for carcinogenesis. The organ-specific lifetime attributable risk (LAR) for out-of-field cancer induction was estimated by the organ dose calculations and the proper risk factors introduced by the BEIR-VII report. The average dose (Dav) and organ equivalent dose (OED) of lung, which was partially included within the treatment volume, was found from 3d-conformal radiotherapy plans. The Dav and OED were used to estimate the lung cancer risk with a linear and mechanistic models, respectively. All risk assessments were made for 50- and 60-year-old male and female patients. RESULTS: Monte Carlo simulations resulted in an out-of-field organ dose range of 0.7-48.4 mGy. The LARs for out-of-field cancer induction were (1.4 × 10-4)% to (2.8 × 10-2)%. These probabilities were at least 403 times lower than the respective lifetime intrinsic risk (LIR) values. The Dav and OED of lung was up to 164.9 and 142.3 mGy, respectively. The LAR for developing lung malignancies varied from 0.11 to 0.18% by the model used and the patient's age and gender. The lung cancer risks were 36-64 times smaller than the LIRs. CONCLUSIONS: The estimated probabilities for developing malignancies due to radiotherapy for non-malignant shoulder syndrome are minor relative to the natural cancer occurrence rates.

Quantifying radiation dose delivered to individual shoulder muscles during breast radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Radiotherapy is an effective treatment for managing breast cancer, but patients may experience shoulder morbidity after completing radiotherapy. There is a knowledge gap regarding how the inclusion of the regional lymphatics in radiation treatment regimens influence the radiation dose delivered to the underlying shoulder musculature. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Five standardized radiation treatment regimens were developed from the computed tomography (CT) scans of 11 patients: tangent fields only (T), high tangent fields (HT), T+supraclavicular fossa and axillary apex with an anterior oblique beam (SCV), T+SCV+axillary nodes with an anterior oblique beam (SCV+AX), and T+SCV+AX with the nodal regions treated with a directly opposed beam configuration (DO). The muscle volumes for nine shoulder muscles anatomically located with the treatment regimens were segmented from the same CT scans. The effect of the nine muscles and five treatment regimens on the percentage of each muscle receiving at least 48Gy (V48Gy) was analyzed with two-way and one-way repeated measures ANOVAs. RESULTS: A statistically significant interaction existed between the nine shoulder muscles and five treatment regimens (p<0.001) on the V48Gy dose. Subsequent one-way analyses found statistically significant main effects of treatment plan on the V48Gy dose for each muscle (p<0.001). The pectoralis major and minor had the greatest V48 doses across the five treatments regimens. The HT, SCV+AX and DO treatment regimens produced statistically significant increases in the V48 dose of the latissimus dorsi and teres major. The infraspinatus, subscapularis, supraspinatus, teres minor, and trapezius only observed statistically significant V48 doses when treated with a DO plan. CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the muscles (pectoralis major, pectoralis minor, latissimus dorsi, and teres major) that may exhibit future morbidity after radiation, and indicate that nodal RT delivered with a DO beam arrangement delivers the highest muscle dose.

Effect of interfractional shoulder motion on low neck nodal targets for patients treated using volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT).

VMAT is an important tool in the treatment of head and neck cancers, many of which also require treatment to the supraclavicular lymph nodes. However, full VMAT arcs treating this nodal region necessarily cause entrance beam to pass through patients' shoulders. Thus, interfractional variations in shoulder position may cause unwanted dose perturbations. To assess this possibility, six patients undergoing treatment at our institution for head and neck cancers with associated supraclavicular lymph node treatment were imaged with in-room CT-on-rails during the course of their treatments. This allowed for the establishment of a true record of the actual shoulder position during selected treatment fractions. Then, a full VMAT plan and a plan with VMAT arcs superior to the shoulder and a static anteroposterior field inferiorly were copied onto the patients' weekly image sets. The average one-dimensional shoulder motion was generally within 10 mm of the simulated position, with some notable exceptions. The standard deviation in week-to-week shoulder position relative to simulation was 4.3 mm and 4.2 mm in the SI and AP dimensions, respectively. The average nodal target mean dose across all fractions sampled was within 5% of planned for all patients and both plans. Similarly, the average D95 for the nodal target was within 5% of planned across all fractions sampled, with the single exception of the full VMAT plan for one patient. In most cases, the standard deviation in both target mean dose and D95 was smaller with the VMAT+static AP field plan than it was with the full VMAT plan.

Axillary irradiation omitting axillary dissection in breast cancer: is there a role for shoulder-sparing proton therapy?

The recent EORTC 10981-22023 AMAROS trial showed that axillary radiotherapy and axillary lymph node dissection provide comparable local control and reduced lymphoedema in the irradiated group. However, no significant differences between the two groups in range of motion and quality of life were reported. It has been acknowledged that axillary irradiation could have induced some toxicity, particularly shoulder function impairment. In fact, conventional breast irradiation by tangential beams has to be modified to achieve full-dose coverage of the axillary nodes, including in the treatment field a larger portion of the shoulder structures. In this scenario, alternative irradiation techniques were discussed. Compared with modern photon techniques, axillary irradiation by proton therapy has the potential for sparing the shoulder without detrimental increase of the medium-to-low doses to the other normal tissues.

Prospective estimation of organ dose in CT under tube current modulation.

PURPOSE: Computed tomography (CT) has been widely used worldwide as a tool for medical diagnosis and imaging. However, despite its significant clinical benefits, CT radiation dose at the population level has become a subject of public attention and concern. In this light, optimizing radiation dose has become a core responsibility for the CT community. As a fundamental step to manage and optimize dose, it may be beneficial to have accurate and prospective knowledge about the radiation dose for an individual patient. In this study, the authors developed a framework to prospectively estimate organ dose for chest and abdominopelvic CT exams under tube current modulation (TCM). METHODS: The organ dose is mainly dependent on two key factors: patient anatomy and irradiation field. A prediction process was developed to accurately model both factors. To model the anatomical diversity and complexity in the patient population, the authors used a previously developed library of computational phantoms with broad distributions of sizes, ages, and genders. A selected clinical patient, represented by a computational phantom in the study, was optimally matched with another computational phantom in the library to obtain a representation of the patient's anatomy. To model the irradiation field, a previously validated Monte Carlo program was used to model CT scanner systems. The tube current profiles were modeled using a ray-tracing program as previously reported that theoretically emulated the variability of modulation profiles from major CT machine manufacturers Li et al., [Phys. Med. Biol. 59, 4525-4548 (2014)]. The prediction of organ dose was achieved using the following process: (1) CTDIvol-normalized-organ dose coefficients (horgan) for fixed tube current were first estimated as the prediction basis for the computational phantoms; (2) each computation phantom, regarded as a clinical patient, was optimally matched with one computational phantom in the library; (3) to account for the effect of the TCM scheme, a weighted organ-specific CTDIvol [denoted as CTDIvol organ,weighted] was computed for each organ based on the TCM profile and the anatomy of the "matched" phantom; (4) the organ dose was predicted by multiplying the weighted organ-specific CTDIvol with the organ dose coefficients (horgan). To quantify the prediction accuracy, each predicted organ dose was compared with the corresponding organ dose simulated from the Monte Carlo program with the TCM profile explicitly modeled. RESULTS: The predicted organ dose showed good agreements with the simulated organ dose across all organs and modulation profiles. The average percentage error in organ dose estimation was generally within 20% across all organs and modulation profiles, except for organs located in the pelvic and shoulder regions. For an average CTDIvol of a CT exam of 10 mGy, the average error at full modulation strength (α = 1) across all organs was 0.91 mGy for chest exams, and 0.82 mGy for abdominopelvic exams. CONCLUSIONS: This study developed a quantitative model to predict organ dose for clinical chest and abdominopelvic scans. Such information may aid in the design of optimized CT protocols in relation to a targeted level of image quality.

Black light visualized solar lentigines on the shoulders and upper back are associated with objectively measured UVR exposure and cutaneous malignant melanoma.

Previous studies on the association of solar lentigines with ultraviolet radiation (UVR) exposure have been based on retrospective questionnaires about UVR exposure. We aimed to investigate the association between solar lentigines and UVR exposure in healthy individuals using objective measurements, and to investigate the association between solar lentigines and cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM). Forty-eight patients with CMM and 48 controls that matched the patients individually by age, sex, constitutive skin type and occupation participated. Solar lentigines on the shoulders and upper back were counted and graded into 3 categories using black light photographs to show sun damage. Current UVR exposure in healthy controls was assessed by personal electronic UVR dosimeters that measured time-related UVR and by corresponding exposure diaries during a summer season. Sunburn history was assessed by interviews. Among controls, the number of solar lentigines was positively associated with daily hours spent outdoors between noon and 3 pm on holidays (P = 0.027), days at the beach (P = 0.048) and reported number of life sunburns (P < 0.001). Compared with matched controls CMM patients had a higher number of solar lentigines (P = 0.044). There was a positive association between CMM and higher solar lentigines grade; Category III versus Category I (P = 0.002) and Category II versus Category I (P = 0.014). Our findings indicate that solar lentigines in healthy individuals are associated with number of life sunburns, as well as time spent outdoors around noon on holidays and beach trips during a summer season, most likely reflecting past UVR exposure, and that solar lentigines are a risk factor for CMM.

Patient radiation protection covers for head CT scans - a clinical evaluation of their effectiveness.

PURPOSE: Although the use of thyroid shields for patients for head CT examinations is reasonable and even required by German regulations, so far available shields are often not used due to difficult applicability. New shields that are easier to use and therefore may gain wider acceptance and more frequent use are now available. In this work two new patient shields are investigated regarding their dose reduction effectiveness and applicability and compared to a thyroid/sternum shield typically used as a part of personal protective equipment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The reduction of organ doses for thyroid, sternum and mamma were measured with thermoluminescence detectors in an anthropomorphic female phantom. Additionally, the influence of the length or position of the overview scan at the beginning of the CT examination was taken into account. RESULTS: Depending on the patient shield, a reduction of the organ doses for thyroid of 5 - 24 %, for sternum of 25 - 48 % and for mamma of 25 - 70 % could be found. A shift of 25 mm in the cranial direction for the overview scan resulted in a reduction of these organ doses of 12 - 15 %. CONCLUSION: Patient shields for cranial CT examinations provide a considerable dose reduction. New models are easily applied and no decrease in image quality through reconstruction artifacts could be found. Therefore, it is advised to use shields which are applied upon the patient without the need to be wrapped around the neck and the overview scan should be positioned as close as possible to the examined region. KEY POINTS: • New shields provide a compromise between usability and radiation protection.• Patient shields reduce organ doses even when not directly exposed.• The overview scan contributes considerably to out of field organ doses.• Shielding factors are greatly influenced by the positioning of the examination field.

Assessment of shoulder position variation and its impact on IMRT and VMAT doses for head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: For radiotherapy of the head and neck, 5-point mask immobilization is used to stabilize the shoulders. Still, the daily position of the shoulders during treatment may be different from the position in the treatment plan despite correct isocenter setup. The purpose of this study was to determine the interfractional displacement of the shoulders relative to isocenter over the course of treatment and the associated dosimetric effect of this displacement. METHODS: The extent of shoulder displacements relative to isocenter was assessed for 10 patients in 5-point thermoplastic masks using image registration and daily CT-on-rails scans. Dosimetric effects on IMRT and VMAT plans were evaluated in Pinnacle based on simulation CTs modified to represent shoulder shifts between 3 and 15 mm in the superior-inferior, anterior-posterior, and right-left directions. The impact of clinically observed shoulder shifts on the low-neck dose distributions was examined. RESULTS: Shoulder motion was 2-5 mm in each direction on average but reached 20 mm. Superior shifts resulted in coverage loss, whereas inferior shifts increased the dose to the brachial plexus. These findings were generally consistent for both IMRT and VMAT plans. Over a course of observed shifts, the dose to 99% of the CTV decreased by up to 101 cGy, and the brachial plexus dose increased by up to 72 cGy. CONCLUSIONS: he position of the shoulder affects target coverage and critical structure dose, and may therefore be a concern during the setup of head and neck patients, particularly those with low neck primary disease.

Effect of pulsed radiofrequency therapy on the suprascapular nerve in shoulder pain of various aetiology.

BACKGROUND: Pulsed radiofrequency treatment (PRF) applied to the suprascapular nerve may provide pain relief for patients suffering from shoulder pain as described in three case series. AIMS: The effect of PRF to the suprascapular nerve was retrospectively analysed on 28 patients with shoulder pain lasting longer than 1 month, with a 6-month follow-up. Group A was treated with PRF and local anaesthetics only while group B was treated with PRF, local anaesthetic and steroid. Pain scores were evaluated before and after the procedure and at 1, 3 and 6 months. RESULTS: More than 50% of patients in both groups had significant pain relief after 3 months. No major, but only one minor complication occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the analgesic effects of PRF last more than 3 months in the majority of patients. The addition of steroid to the PRF treatment appears to have no benefit.

Comparison of patient-reported breast, arm, and shoulder symptoms and body image after radiotherapy for early breast cancer: 5-year follow-up in the randomised Standardisation of Breast Radiotherapy (START) trials.

BACKGROUND: Few trials of adjuvant breast radiotherapy have incorporated patient-reported breast symptoms and related areas of quality of life. We assessed these measures in a quality-of-life study that was part of the randomised START (Standardisation of Breast Radiotherapy) trials. METHODS: In START trial A, 2236 patients were randomly assigned to receive either 39 Gy or 41.6 Gy delivered in 13 fractions over 5 weeks or a global standard of 50 Gy in 25 fractions. In START trial B, 2215 women were randomly assigned to receive either 40 Gy in 15 fractions over 3 weeks or the same control regimen (50 Gy in 25 fractions) as in trial A. 2739 patients were eligible for the quality-of-life study of whom 2208 (81%) were accrued (1129 patients from trial A and 1079 from trial B). Participants completed the EORTC QLQ-C30 and BR23 questionnaires and protocol-specific radiotherapy items up to 5 years after radiotherapy. We compared results across regimens with generalised estimating equations and survival analyses. The START trials are registered, ISRCTN59368779. FINDINGS: At 5 years, up to 40% women reported moderate or marked changes to the breast after radiotherapy, and arm and shoulder pain affected up to a third of patients. Breast symptoms and body image concerns reduced over time. Rates of radiotherapy adverse effects were lower for the 39 Gy regimen in trial A and the 40 Gy regimen in trial B, compared with the 50 Gy control regimen; rates of radiotherapy adverse effects were similar between the 41.6 Gy and 50 Gy regimens in trial A. Adverse change in skin appearance was significantly lower for patients who received 39 Gy compared with those who received 50 Gy (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.47-0.84) and for those who received 40 Gy compared with those who received 50 Gy (0.76, 0.60-0.97); no significant difference was observed between patients who received 41.6 Gy and those who received 50 Gy in trial A (0.83, 0.63-1.08). Patient self-ratings of breast symptoms discriminated a 10% difference in randomised dose intensity. Up to a third of women reported moderate or marked pain in the arm and shoulder over 5 years whilst more than 10% experienced moderate or marked arm and hand swelling, with no significant difference in arm/shoulder subscale scores between the regimens in trial A or trial B; many baseline arm and shoulder symptoms were associated with prior surgery. INTERPRETATION: A substantial proportion of women report moderate or marked breast, arm, and shoulder symptoms over 5 years of follow-up after radiotherapy, but with no detriment to body image. Nonetheless, most patients stand to gain from hypofractionated radiotherapy regimens with a potential for fewer adverse effects; this strengthens the evidence from the START trials for hypofractionated regimens for women requiring radiotherapy for early breast cancer. FUNDING: Cancer Research UK, UK Medical Research Council, UK Department of Health.

Miositis postradioterapia de hombro: importancia del tratamiento rehabilitador / Post-radiation myositis of the shoulder: importance of rehabilitation treatment

Se presenta el caso de una paciente de 44 años de edad, afecta de dolor y limitación del balance articular del hombro izquierdo después de ser sometida a tratamiento radioterápico como consecuencia de un linfoma folicular. En la analítica realizada se detecta un aumento de creatín fosfocinasa (CPK) y en la resonancia magnética nuclear (RMN) de hombro se observa una miositis postradioterapia que afecta los músculos supra e infraespinosos. En este efecto adverso, poco frecuente, relacionado con dosis de radioterapia elevadas (mayor dosis por fracción), el tratamiento corticoideo oral, el manejo adecuado del dolor y el inicio precoz del tratamiento rehabilitador son las tres herramientas fundamentales para reducir las posibilidades de discapacidad (AU)

The case of a 44-year-old female patient suffering pain and joint balance limitation in the left shoulder after radiation therapy due to a follicular lymphoma is presented. An increased level of CPK was detected. In addition, the MRI of the shoulder showed a post-radiation myositis affecting the supra- and infraspinatus muscles. An adverse effect related with elevated radiotherapy doses (larger fractional doses) is uncommon. Oral corticosteroid treatment, correct pain management and the early initiation of rehabilitation are the three fundamental tools to reduce the possibility of disability (AU)

Magnitude of late effects of breast cancer treatments on shoulder function: a systematic review.

Late effects of treatment for breast cancer on shoulder function have been documented by a number of investigators; however, many studies include only prevalence data. When comparisons are provided that assess differences between treatment groups, only P-values without magnitudes of effect are often reported. The purpose of this systematic review was to identify literature that could be used to examine the magnitude of late effects of breast cancer treatments on shoulder function with a particular focus on axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and on radiotherapy. A comprehensive search of online databases was performed for research papers published between 1980 and 2008 that provided comparison data between treatment groups, between the affected and unaffected side of individuals, or between pre-operative and subsequent assessments 12 months or more after diagnosis of breast cancer. Papers that met inclusion criteria were reviewed using a methodological checklist. Standardized effect sizes were computed for continuous data; odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were computed for dichotomous data if not already available. Twenty-two papers met the inclusion criteria. With a few exceptions, most analyses showed excess shoulder morbidity with breast cancer treatment, ALND, or radiotherapy. Although effect sizes varied, moderate to large effects predominated across the different outcomes. There is sufficient evidence of late effects of ALND or radiotherapy post-breast cancer to warrant careful attention to shoulder function across time in individuals who have had breast cancer. Implications for future shoulder dysfunction are discussed.

Neuromodulation of effects of upper limb motor function and shoulder range of motion by functional electric stimulation (FES).

Upper extremity motor impairment is a major contributing factor to functional disability of stroke patients. Functional electric stimulation (FES) is one of the therapeutic regimens for the management of upper extremity dysfunction after stroke. This review shows that therapeutic FES intervention on supraspinatus and posterior deltoid muscles for 6 weeks is effective to speed up upper limb motor recovery in hemiplegia of short-duration after stroke or less severely affected symptoms. The positive effect of FES could be attributable to neural mechanisms including: an enhanced information flow from the joint and muscle afferents, a better visual perception of the movement produced, and a stronger muscle contraction due to direct stimulation of the motor neuron. However, FES was demonstrated as not being effective in reducing the shoulder range of motion of external rotation in patients with either short- or long-duration hemiplegia. In order to offer better management in maintaining or improving limited shoulder range of motion, other types of electrical stimulation should be considered.