Encuesta sobre las características y honorarios de la práctica dermatológica privada española en 2023. Actualización y cambios con respecto a 2018 / Survey on Private Dermatology Practice Characteristics and Fees in Spain in 2023. Update and Changes From 2018

El presente trabajo incluye el análisis de los datos obtenidos mediante una encuesta realizada en enero de 2023 a 235 dermatólogos que ejercen actividad asistencial privada en España. Se añade un fotograma posterior al estudio con metodología similar realizado en 2018, al mismo tiempo que se analizan los cambios y adaptaciones que tiene la práctica con los nuevos tiempos y retos emergentes. Comparado con 2018, en 2023 destacan: incrementos en la dedicación a la actividad privada, las teleconsultas, el cobro anticipado de técnicas, la aceptación de pagos con tarjeta bancaria y banca electrónica; cambios en la periodicidad de ajuste de precios; el hecho de que un 60% de los encuestados declare que ha ajustado al alza los precios en el año; un incremento de los precios que se ajusta aproximadamente al del IPC y la observación de que los dermatólogos varones declaran con más frecuencia precios extremos más altos (AU)

The present work includes the analysis of the data obtained through a survey conducted in January 2023 to 235 dermatologists practicing private healthcare activity in Spain. A subsequent frame is added to the study with similar methodology carried out in 2018, while analyzing the changes and adaptations that the practice has with the new times and emerging challenges. Compared to 2018, in 2023 the following findings stand out: increases in dedication to private activity, teleconsultations, advance payment for techniques, acceptance of payments by bank card and electronic banking; changes in the periodicity of price adjustment; the fact that 60% of respondents state that they have adjusted prices upwards in the year; a rise in prices that is approximately in line with that of the CPI, and the observation that male dermatologists more frequently state higher extreme prices (AU)

[Translated article] Private Dermatology Practice Characteristics and Fees in Spain in 2023: A Survey and Comparison With Findings for 2018 / Encuesta sobre las características y honorarios de la práctica dermatológica privada española en 2023. Actualización y cambios con respecto a 2018

This report analyzes findings from a January 2023 survey of 235 dermatologists in private practice in Spain. The data for 2023 are compared to findings from a similar survey of conditions in 2018, to provide a snapshot of each year and identify changes in clinical practice and adaptations to emerging situations and challenges. Noteworthy changes in 2023 vs. 2018 included increased dedication to private practice and teleconsultations, more use of prepayment for procedures, more acceptance of payment by credit card or other electronic means, and variation in the timing of price changes. Sixty percent of the respondents reported planning to raise prices in 2023. The planned pricing adjustments will approximate the rise in the consumer price index. We also found that male dermatologists more often reported fees at the highest end of the range (AU)

El presente trabajo incluye el análisis de los datos obtenidos mediante una encuesta realizada en enero de 2023 a 235 dermatólogos que ejercen actividad asistencial privada en España. Se añade un fotograma posterior al estudio con metodología similar realizado en 2018, al mismo tiempo que se analizan los cambios y adaptaciones que tiene la práctica con los nuevos tiempos y retos emergentes. Comparado con 2018, en 2023 destacan: incrementos en la dedicación a la actividad privada, las teleconsultas, el cobro anticipado de técnicas, la aceptación de pagos con tarjeta bancaria y banca electrónica; cambios en la periodicidad de ajuste de precios; el hecho de que un 60% de los encuestados declare que ha ajustado al alza los precios en el año; un alza de los precios que se ajusta aproximadamente a la del IPC, y la observación de que los dermatólogos varones declaran con más frecuencia precios extremos más altos (AU)

Client Service Receipt Inventory as a standardised tool for measurement of socio-economic costs in the rare genetic disease population (CSRI-Ra).

The measurement of costs is fundamental in healthcare decision-making, but it is often challenging. In particular, standardised methods have not been developed in the rare genetic disease population. A reliable and valid tool is critical for research to be locally meaningful yet internationally comparable. Herein, we sought to develop, contextualise, translate, and validate the Client Service Receipt Inventory for the RAre disease population (CSRI-Ra) to be used in cost-of-illness studies and economic evaluations for healthcare planning. Through expert panel discussions and focus group meetings involving 17 rare disease patients, carers, and healthcare and social care professionals from Hong Kong, we have developed the CSRI-Ra. Rounds of forward and backward translations were performed by bilingual researchers, and face validity and semantic equivalence were achieved through interviews and telephone communications with focus group participants and an additional of 13 healthcare professional and university students. Intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess criterion validity between CSRI-Ra and electronic patient record in a sample of 94 rare disease patients and carers, with overall ICC being 0.69 (95% CI 0.56-0.78), indicating moderate to good agreement. Following rounds of revision in the development, contextualisation, translation, and validation stages, the CSRI-Ra is ready for use in empirical research. The CSRI-Ra provides a sufficiently standardised yet adaptable method for collecting socio-economic data related to rare genetic diseases. This is important for near-term and long-term monitoring of the resource consequences of rare diseases, and it provides a tool for use in economic evaluations in the future, thereby helping to inform planning for efficient and effective healthcare. Adaptation of the CSRI-Ra to other populations would facilitate international research.

The Impact of Inflation on the Medical and Hospital Money Transfers of the Neurosurgical Procedures of the Brazilian Unified Healthcare System from 2008 to 2017

Introduction There are more than 1,500 hospital procedures included in the Brazilian Unified Healthcare System's (SUS, in the Portuguese acronym) table, which is the reference for service payment provided by establishments serving the public health network, and they are stagnant. The underfinancing of procedures is so dramatic that in some cases the amounts paid by the SUS are even lower than the taxes generated by the costs of the same procedures in Brazilian private hospitals. This article aims to compare the evolution of the compensation of neurosurgical procedures by calculating the percentile of the lag in the values transferred to both neurosurgeons and hospitals, according to the SUS table, establishing the ideal and real values according to the current inflation, in a retrospective 9-year comparison. Methodology This is an observational, comparative, retrospective study, based on the values of medical and hospital money transfers of 25 neurosurgical procedures in 2008, which were corrected according to the 2017 National Consumer Price Index (IPCA, in the Portuguese acronym). Results Through this study, from 2008 to 2017, the transfers of medical fees regarding neurosurgical techniques are almost completely outdated. As examples, we can mention: the external/subgaleal ventricular shunt, with a deficit of 43.6%; the electrode implant for brain stimulation, with - 41.67%; and decompressive craniotomy, with - 32.21% in relation to the corrected value. Only 4 of the 25 neurosurgeries present a value above that predicted by the IPCA, one of them being cerebral aneurysm embolization larger than 1.5 cm with a narrow neck (þ 8.0%). Regarding the money transfers to hospitals, all procedures are 43.6% lower than expected, since there was no readjustment in the amounts paid to the institutions in the analyzed period. For example, in 2008, for the transposition of the cubital nerve, R$ 267.30 were transferred, and the same amount was maintained in 2017; and, for the surgical treatment of compressive syndrome in osteofibrous tunnel at carpal level (R$ 145.18), the amount also remained fixed throughout these 9 years. Conclusion Because they did not follow the evolution of the economy, in 80% of the surgeries, the neurosurgeons did not have their economic demands met regarding the procedures performed through SUS. And the data became even more alarming when the money transfers to hospitals were evaluated, since there was no evolution in the money transfers for any of the neurosurgeries evaluated.

Trends in Insurance Coverage for Complementary Health Care Services.

Introduction: Complementary health care professionals deliver a substantial component of clinical services in the United States, but insurance coverage for many such services may be inadequate. The objective of this project was to follow up on an earlier single-year study with an evaluation of trends in reimbursement for complementary health care services over a 7-year period. Methods: The authors employed a retrospective serial cross-sectional design to analyze health insurance claims for services provided by licensed acupuncturists, chiropractors, and naturopaths in New Hampshire (NH) from 2011 to 2017. They restricted the analyses to claims in nonemergent outpatient settings for Current Procedural Terminology code 99213, which is one of the most commonly used clinical procedure codes across all specialties. They evaluated by year the likelihood of reimbursement, as compared with primary care physicians as the gold standard. A generalized estimating equation model was used to account for within-person correlations among the separate claim reimbursement indicators for individuals used in the analysis, using an exchangeable working covariance structure among claims for the same individual. Reimbursement was defined as payment >0 dollars. Results: The total number of clinical services claimed was 26,725 for acupuncture, 8317 for naturopathic medicine, 2,539,144 for chiropractic, and 1,860,271 for primary care. Initially, likelihood of reimbursement for naturopathic physicians was higher relative to primary care physicians, but was lower from 2014 onward. Odds of reimbursement for both acupuncture and chiropractic claims remained lower throughout the study period. In 2017, as compared with primary care the likelihood of reimbursement was 77% lower for acupuncturists, 72% lower for chiropractors, and 64% lower for naturopaths. Conclusion: The likelihood of reimbursement for complementary health care services is significantly lower than that for primary care physicians in NH. Lack of insurance coverage may result in reduced patient access to such services.

Honorarios y hábitos de cobro en la dermatología privada en España / Fees and Payment-Collection Habits in Private Dermatology in Spain

No disponible

Encuesta sobre las características y honorarios de la práctica dermatológica privada española en 2018 / Survey on Private Dermatology Practice Characteristics and Fees in Spain in 2018

Antecedentes y objetivo: Las tarifas por acto médico y los hábitos de asistencia privada de los dermatólogos apenas han sido objeto de estudio, al menos en nuestro entorno inmediato. Con el presente trabajo pretendemos describir hábitos de prestación de servicios, medios de cobro, promoción y fijación de tarifas de los dermatólogos que realizan asistencia privada en España. Secundariamente, buscamos analizar las diferencias por sección territorial, edad y sexo. Materiales y métodos: Estudio descriptivo transversal a partir de un cuestionario on-line con un total de 31 preguntas dirigido exclusivamente a dermatólogos con asistencia privada en España, abierto a respuestas del 17 de mayo al 5 de junio de 2018. Los datos fueron analizados comparando por sección territorial, sexo y edad. Resultados: Se recibió un total de 234 respuestas, paritarias en cuanto a sexo y proporcionadas en cuanto a las secciones territoriales de la Academia Española de Dermatología y Venereología (AEDV). Pudieron constatarse algunas diferencias por sección territorial, edad y sexo. Destacaban las tarifas sistemáticamente menores de las dermatólogas, incluso tras ajustar por factores de confusión mediante modelos de regresión. Conclusiones: Quedan descritas características de la asistencia privada en Dermatología en España. El hecho de que haya tarifas más baratas entre las dermatólogas requiere de un estudio más detallado, probablemente mediante técnicas de investigación cualitativa

Background and objective: Per-visit fees and the characteristics of private practice in dermatology have been studied very little, at least in Spain. This study aims to describe how dermatologists in private practice in Spain provide services, collect payment, promote their services, and establish fees. We also analyze differences by region, age, and sex. Materials and methods: We performed a descriptive, cross-sectional study based on an online questionnaire with a total of 31 questions aimed exclusively at dermatologists in private practice in Spain. The questionnaire was open for responses from May 17 to June 5, 2018. The data were analyzed by comparing region, sex, and age. Results: A total of 234 questionnaires were returned, with equal numbers of male and female respondents and proportional numbers in terms of the regional sections of the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (AEDV). Some differences were found for region, age, and sex. The fees of female dermatologists were consistently lower, even after adjusting for confounding factors by means of regression models. Conclusions: We have described the characteristics of private dermatology practice in Spain. Charging of lower fees by female dermatologists requires more detailed study, probably using qualitative research techniques

Professional fee payments by specialty for inpatient open ventral hernia repair: who gets paid for treating comorbidities and complications?

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine perioperative professional fee payments to providers from different specialties for the care of patients undergoing inpatient open ventral hernia repair (VHR). METHODS: Perioperative data of patients undergoing VHR at a single center over 3 years were selected from our NSQIP database. 180-day follow-up data were obtained via retrospective review of records and phone calls to patients. Professional fee payments (PFPs) to all providers were obtained from our physician billing system for the VHR hospitalization, the 180 days prior to operation (180Prior) and the 180 days post-discharge (180Post). RESULTS: PFPs for 283 cases were analyzed. Average total 360-day PFPs per patient were $3409 ± SD 3294, with 14.5% ($493 ± 1546) for services in the 180Preop period, 72.5% ($2473 ± 1881) for the VHR hospitalization, and 13.0% ($443 ± 1097) in the 180Postop period. The surgical service received 62% of PFPs followed by anesthesia (18%), medical specialties (9%), radiology (6%), and all other provider services (5%). Medical specialties received increased PFPs for care of patients with COPD and HCT < 38% ($90 and $521, respectively) and for the pulmonary complications ($2471) and sepsis ($2714) that correlated with those patient comorbidities; surgeons did not. Operative duration, mesh size, and separation of components were associated with increased surgeon PFPs (p < .05). At 6 months, wound complications were associated with increased surgeon and radiology payments (p < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Management of acute comorbid conditions and the associated higher postoperative morbidity is not reimbursed to the surgeon under the 90-day global fee. These represent opportunity costs of care that pressure busy surgeons to select against these patients or to delegate more management to their medical specialty colleagues, thereby increasing total system costs. A comorbid risk adjustment of procedural reimbursement is warranted. In negotiating bundled payments, surgeon groups should keep in mind that surgeon reimbursement, unlike medical specialty and hospital reimbursement, have been bundled since the 1990s.

Willingness to Pay for Colorectal Cancer Screening and Effect of Copayment in Southern Thailand

Background: The incidence rate of colorectal cancer in Thailand is increasing. Hence, the nationwide screening programme with copayment is being considered. There are two proposed screening alternatives: annual fecal immunochemical test (FIT) and once-in-10-year colonoscopy. A copayment for FIT is 60 Thai baht (THB) per test (≈ 1.7 USD); a copayment for colonoscopy is 2,300 THB per test (≈ 65.5 USD). Methods: The willingness to pay (WTP) technique, which is theoretically founded on a cost-benefit analysis, was used to assess an effect of copayment on the uptake. Subjects were patients aged 50-69 years without cancer or screening experience. WTP for the proposed tests was elicited. Results: Nearly two thirds of subjects were willing to pay for FIT. Less than half of subjects were willing to pay for colonoscopy. Among them, median WTP for both tests was greater than the proposed copayments. In a probit model, knowing CRC patient and presence of companion were associated with non-zero WTP for FIT. Presence of companion, female, and family history of cancer were associated with non-zero WTP for colonoscopy. After adjustment for starting price in the linear model, marital status, drinking behavior, and risk attitude were associated with WTP. None of factors was significant for colonoscopy. Uptake decreased as levels of copayment increased. At proposed copayments, the uptake rates of 59.8% and 21.6% were estimated for colonoscopy and FIT respectively. The demand for FIT was price inelastic; the demand for colonoscopy was price elastic. Estimates of optimal copayment were 62.1 THB for FIT and 460.2 THB for colonoscopy. At the optimal copayment, uptake rates would be 59.8% for FIT and 42.3% for colonoscopy.Conclusion(s): More subjects were willing to pay for FIT than for colonoscopy (59.0% versus 46.5%). The estimated uptake rates were 59.8% and 21.6% for colonoscopy and FIT at the proposed copayments.

The effect of hospital acquisitions of physician practices on prices and spending.

During the past decade, U.S. hospitals have acquired a large number of physician practices. For example, from 2007 to 2013, hospitals acquired nearly 10% of the practices in our sample. We find that the prices for the services provided by acquired physicians increase by an average of 14.1% post-acquisition. Nearly half of this increase is attributable to the exploitation of payment rules. Price increases are larger when the acquiring hospital has a larger share of its inpatient market. We find that integration of primary care physicians increases enrollee spending by 4.9%.

Surgeon variation in operating times and charges for emergency general surgery.

BACKGROUND: Patients and hospitals face significant financial burdens from emergency general surgeries (EGSs), which have been termed a public health crisis in the United States. We evaluated hospitalization charges, operating charges, and variations in operating time by surgeon volume for three common EGS procedures. METHODS: Using Maryland's Health Services Cost Review Commission database, we performed a retrospective study of laparoscopic appendectomies, laparoscopic cholecystectomies, and open bowel resections performed by general surgeons among adult patients from July 2012 to September 2014. We compared operating charges to total hospitalization charges and quantified variations in operating time for each procedure. We then divided patients into quartiles based on their surgeon's procedure-specific case volume and used hierarchical linear regressions to calculate differences in both operating time and charges between quartiles. RESULTS: We identified 3194 appendectomies, 4143 cholecystectomies, and 1478 bowel resections. Operating charges accounted for one-quarter (26.9%) of total hospitalization charges and widespread variation existed in operating time (appendectomies: median 79 min [interquartile range 66-100 min], cholecystectomies: 96 min [76-125 min], bowel resections: 155 min [117-209 min]). After adjustment, low-volume surgeons relative to high-volume surgeons did not operate statistically longer for appendectomies (+1%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -2% to 5%) but operated +16% (95% CI: 12%-20%) longer for cholecystectomies (+14 min) and +40% (95% CI: 30%-50%) longer for bowel resections (+59 min). Adjusted median operating charges from low-volume surgeons relative to high-volume surgeons were $554 (26.7%), $621 (22.0%), and $1801 (47.0%) greater for appendectomies, cholecystectomies, and bowel resections, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Operating charges contributed substantially to total EGS hospitalization charges, where low-volume surgeons operated longer and had higher operative charges relative to high-volume surgeons. Reducing variations in operating times and charges represents an opportunity to alleviate the financial burden from EGS procedures.

Patient cost-sharing, socioeconomic status, and children's health care utilization.

This paper estimates the effect of cost-sharing on the demand for children's and adolescents' use of medical care. We use a large population-wide registry dataset including detailed information on contacts with the health care system as well as family income. Two different estimation strategies are used: regression discontinuity design exploiting age thresholds above which fees are charged, and difference-in-differences models exploiting policy changes. We also estimate combined regression discontinuity difference-in-differences models that take into account discontinuities around age thresholds caused by factors other than cost-sharing. We find that when care is free of charge, individuals increase their number of doctor visits by 5-10%. Effects are similar in middle childhood and adolescence, and are driven by those from low-income families. The differences across income groups cannot be explained by other factors that correlate with income, such as maternal education.

How much do cancer specialists earn? A comparison of physician fees and remuneration in oncology and radiology in high-income countries.

The main driver of higher spending on health care in the US is believed to be substantially higher fees paid to US physicians in comparison with other countries. We aim to compare physician incomes in radiology and oncology considering differences in relation to fees paid, physician capacity and volume of services provided in five countries: the United States, Canada, Australia, France and the United Kingdom. The fee for a consultation with a specialist in oncology varies threefold across countries, and more than fourfold for chemotherapy. There is also a three to fourfold variation in fees for ultrasound and CT scans. Physician earnings in the US are greater than in other countries in both oncology and radiology, more than three times higher than in the UK; Canadian oncologists and radiologists earn considerably more than their European counterparts. Although challenging, benchmarking earnings and fees for similar health care activities across countries, and understanding the factors that explain any differences, can provide valuable insights for policy makers trying to enhance efficiency and quality in service delivery, especially in the face of rising care costs.

Efficiency of inpatient orthopedic surgery in Japan: a medical claims database analysis.

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to determine the characteristics of healthcare facilities that produce the most efficient inpatient orthopedic surgery using a large-scale medical claims database in Japan. Design/methodology/approach Reimbursement claims data were obtained from April 1 through September 30, 2014. Input-oriented Banker-Charnes-Cooper model of data envelopment analysis (DEA) was employed. The decision-making unit was defined as a healthcare facility where orthopedic surgery was performed. Inputs were defined as the length of stay, the number of beds, and the total costs of expensive surgical devices. Output was defined as total surgical fees for each surgery. Efficiency scores of healthcare facilities were compared among different categories of healthcare facilities. Findings The efficiency scores of healthcare facilities with a diagnosis-procedure combination (DPC) reimbursement were significantly lower than those without DPC ( p=0.0000). All the efficiency scores of clinics with beds were 1. Their efficiency scores were significantly higher than those of university hospitals, public hospitals, and other hospitals ( p=0.0000). Originality/value This is the first research that applied DEA for orthopedic surgery in Japan. The healthcare facilities with DPC reimbursement were less efficient than those without DPC. The clinics with beds were the most efficient among all types of management bodies of healthcare facilities.

Differences in Clinical Activity and Medicare Payments for Female vs Male Ophthalmologists.

IMPORTANCE: The number of women in ophthalmology is rising. Little is known about their clinical activity and collections. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether charges, as reflected in reimbursements from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to ophthalmologists, differ by sex and how disparity relates to differences in clinical activity. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective review of the CMS database for payments to ophthalmologists from January 1, 2012, through December 31, 2013. The dates of the analysis were February 1 through May 30, 2016. After exclusion of J and Q codes, the total payments to and the number of charges by individual ophthalmologists were analyzed. The mean values were compared using a single t test, and the medians were compared by the nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum test. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary outcome measures were the mean and median CMS payments to male and female ophthalmologists in outpatient, non-facility-based settings. Secondary outcome measures included the number of charges submitted by men and women and the types of charges most commonly submitted by men and women. RESULTS: This study included 16 111 ophthalmologists (3078 women [19.1%] and 13 033 men [80.9%]) in 2012 and 16 179 ophthalmologists (3206 women [19.8%] and 12 973 men [80.2%]) in 2013. In 2012, the average female ophthalmologist collected $0.58 (95% CI, $0.54-$0.62; P < .001) for every dollar collected by a male ophthalmologist; comparing the medians, women collected $0.56 (95% CI, $0.50-$0.61; P < .001) for every dollar earned by men. Mean and median collections were similar when comparing female vs male ophthalmologists in 2013 (P < .001). The mean payment per charge was the same for men and women, $66 in 2012 and $64 in 2013. There was a strong association between collections and work product, with female ophthalmologists submitting fewer charges to Medicare in 2012 (median, 1120 charges; difference -935; 95% CI, -1024 to -846; P < .001) and in 2013 (median, 1141 charges; difference -937; 95% CI, -1026 to -848; P < .001) than male ophthalmologists. When corrected by comparing men and women with similar clinical activity, renumeration was still lower for women. In both years, women were underrepresented among ophthalmologists with the highest collections. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Remuneration from the CMS was disparate between male and female ophthalmologists in 2012 and 2013 because of the submission of fewer charges by women. Further studies are necessary to explore root causes for this difference, with equity in opportunity and parity in clinical activity standing to benefit the specialty.