Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 9.788
Filtrar
1.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 24(1): 605, 2024 May 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38720277

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Distal radius fractures (DRFs) have become a public health problem for all countries, bringing a heavier economic burden of disease globally, with China's disease economic burden being even more acute due to the trend of an aging population. This study aimed to explore the influencing factors of hospitalization cost of patients with DRFs in traditional Chinese medicine (TCMa) hospitals to provide a scientific basis for controlling hospitalization cost. METHODS: With 1306 cases of DRFs patients hospitalized in 15 public TCMa hospitals in two cities of Gansu Province in China from January 2017 to 2022 as the study object, the influencing factors of hospitalization cost were studied in depth gradually through univariate analysis, multiple linear regression, and path model. RESULTS: Hospitalization cost of patients with DRFs is mainly affected by the length of stay, surgery and operation, hospital levels, payment methods of medical insurance, use of TCMa preparations, complications and comorbidities, and clinical pathways. The length of stay is the most critical factor influencing the hospitalization cost, and the longer the length of stay, the higher the hospitalization cost. CONCLUSIONS: TCMa hospitals should actively take advantage of TCMb diagnostic modalities and therapeutic methods to ensure the efficacy of treatment and effectively reduce the length of stay at the same time, to lower hospitalization cost. It is also necessary to further deepen the reform of the medical insurance payment methods and strengthen the construction of the hierarchical diagnosis and treatment system, to make the patients receive reasonable reimbursement for medical expenses, thus effectively alleviating the economic burden of the disease in the patients with DRFs.


Asunto(s)
Costos de Hospital , Hospitalización , Tiempo de Internación , Medicina Tradicional China , Fracturas del Radio , Humanos , China , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medicina Tradicional China/economía , Anciano , Fracturas del Radio/economía , Fracturas del Radio/terapia , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/economía , Adulto , Hospitales Públicos/economía , Fracturas de la Muñeca
2.
Front Public Health ; 12: 1380690, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38721535

RESUMEN

Background: Obesity has been extensively studied over the years, primarily focusing on the physiological aspects of the disease. However, the general burden of obesity mainly the financial implications and its influence on hospitalization and length of stay have only recently garnered attention in the literature, particularly in the case of Portugal. Aim: This study aimed to investigate the association between obesity and hospitalizations in the Portuguese adult population and compare the average costs of hospitalization among participants with and without obesity. Methods: At baseline, the analytic sample consisted of 10,102 participants aged ≥18 years from the Portuguese population-based Epidemiology of Chronic Diseases Cohort (EpiDoC). Participants were then followed for up to 10 years from 2011 to 2021 in three more waves of data collection. Body mass index was derived from self-reported weight and height, and instances of hospitalization were self-reported by the participants. The associated costs for each hospitalization episode were categorized according to national legislation and valued according to the pricing for Diagnosis Related Groups. Results: Obesity was associated with more hospitalizations (for example, Obesity class I vs. normal weight: OR = 1.33 [1.14-1.55]). However, when the presence of multimorbidity was considered, this association diminished. While longer hospital length of stay was observed in individuals with higher obesity categories, this difference did not reach statistical significance. On average, the total hospitalization costs per patient with obesity amounted to €200.4 per year. Conclusion: Obesity is as a risk factor for hospitalizations and potentially with higher length of stay hospitalizations, with this effect being partially mediated by the concurrent presence of multimorbidity. Consequently, obesity constitutes an additional burden on healthcare systems. This underscores the imperative of implementing cost-effective prevention programs aimed at addressing and managing this significant public health concern.


Asunto(s)
Hospitalización , Obesidad , Humanos , Portugal/epidemiología , Obesidad/epidemiología , Obesidad/economía , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Anciano , Índice de Masa Corporal , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Estudios de Cohortes , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos
3.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0302808, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38696487

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: One of the largest problems facing the world today is the morbidity and mortality caused by antibiotic resistance in bacterial infections. A major factor in antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is the irrational use of antibiotics. The objective of this study was to assess the prescribing pattern and cost of antibiotics in two major governmental hospitals in the West Bank of Palestine. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 428 inpatient prescriptions containing antibiotics from two major governmental hospitals, they were evaluated by some drug use indicators. The cost of antibiotics in these prescriptions was calculated based on the local cost. Descriptive statistics were performed using IBM-SPSS version 21. RESULTS: The mean ± SD number of drugs per prescription (NDPP) was 6.72 ± 4.37. Of these medicines, 38.9% were antibiotics. The mean ± SD number of antibiotics per prescription (NAPP) was 2.61 ± 1.54. The average ± SD cost per prescription (CPP) was 392 ± 744 USD. The average ± SD antibiotic cost per prescription (ACPP) was 276 ± 553 USD. The most commonly prescribed antibiotics were ceftriaxone (52.8%), metronidazole (24.8%), and vancomycin (21.0%). About 19% of the antibiotics were prescribed for intra-abdominal infections; followed by 16% used as prophylactics to prevent infections. Almost all antibiotics prescribed were administered intravenously (IV) 94.63%. In general, the average duration of antibiotic therapy was 7.33 ± 8.19 days. The study indicated that the number of antibiotics per prescription was statistically different between the hospitals (p = 0.022), and it was also affected by other variables like the diagnosis (p = 0.006), the duration of hospitalization (p < 0.001), and the NDPP (p < 0.001). The most commonly prescribed antibiotics and the cost of antibiotics per prescription were significantly different between the two hospitals (p < 0.001); The cost was much higher in the Palestinian Medical Complex. CONCLUSION: The practice of prescribing antibiotics in Palestine's public hospitals may be unnecessary and expensive. This has to be improved through education, adherence to recommendations, yearly immunization, and stewardship programs; intra-abdominal infections were the most commonly seen infection in inpatients and ceftriaxone was the most frequently administered antibiotic.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Masculino , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/economía , Medio Oriente , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hospitalización/economía , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/economía , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Ceftriaxona/uso terapéutico , Ceftriaxona/economía , Costos de los Medicamentos , Anciano
4.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm ; 30(5): 430-440, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38701030

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most common type of leukemia. However, published studies of CLL have either only focused on costs among individuals diagnosed with CLL without a non-CLL comparator group or focused on costs associated with specific CLL treatments. An examination of utilization and costs across different care settings provides a holistic view of utilization associated with CLL. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the health care costs and resource utilization types attributable to CLL among Medicare beneficiaries and identify predictors associated with each of the economic outcomes among beneficiaries diagnosed with CLL. METHODS: This retrospective study used a random 20% sample of the Medicare Chronic Conditions Data Warehouse (CCW) database covering the 2017-2019 period. The study population consisted of individuals with and without CLL. The CLL cohort and non-CLL cohort were matched using a 1:5 hard match based on baseline categorical variables. We characterized economic outcomes over 360 days across cost categories and places of services. We estimated average marginal effects using multivariable generalized linear regression models of total costs and across type of services. Total cost was compared between CLL and non-CLL cohorts using the matched sample. We used generalized linear models appropriate for the count or binary outcome to identify factors associated with various categories of health care resource utilization, such as inpatient admissions, emergency department (ED) visits, and oncologist/hematologist visits. RESULTS: A total of 2,736 beneficiaries in the CLL cohort and 13,571 beneficiaries in the non-CLL matched cohort were identified. Compared with the non-CLL cohort, the annual cost for the CLL cohort was higher (CLL vs non-CLL, mean [SD]: $22,781 [$37,592] vs $13,901 [$24,725]), mainly driven by health care provider costs ($6,535 vs $3,915) and Part D prescription drug costs ($5,916 vs $2,556). The main categories of health care resource utilization were physician evaluation/management visits, oncologist/hematologist visits, and laboratory services. Compared with beneficiaries aged 65-74 years, beneficiaries aged 85 years or older had lower use and cost in maintenance services (ie, oncologist visits, hospital outpatient costs, and prescription drug cost) but higher use and cost in acute services (ie, ED). Compared with residency in a metropolitan area, living in a nonmetropolitan area was associated with fewer physician visits but higher ED visits and hospitalizations. CONCLUSIONS: The cooccurrence of lower utilization of routine care services, along with higher utilization of acute care services among some individuals, has implications for patient burden and warrants further study.


Asunto(s)
Costos de la Atención en Salud , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B , Medicare , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Humanos , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B/economía , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B/terapia , Estados Unidos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Medicare/economía , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Recursos en Salud/economía , Recursos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos
5.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 13(9): e030679, 2024 May 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38700039

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) contributes to the generation, recurrence, and perpetuation of atrial fibrillation, and it is associated with worse outcomes. Little is known about the economic impact of OSA therapy in atrial fibrillation. This retrospective cohort study assessed the impact of positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy adherence on health care resource use and costs in patients with OSA and atrial fibrillation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Insurance claims data for ≥1 year before sleep testing and 2 years after device setup were linked with objective PAP therapy use data. PAP adherence was defined from an extension of the US Medicare 90-day definition. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to create covariate-balanced PAP adherence groups to mitigate confounding. Of 5867 patients (32% women; mean age, 62.7 years), 41% were adherent, 38% were intermediate, and 21% were nonadherent. Mean±SD number of all-cause emergency department visits (0.61±1.21 versus 0.77±1.55 [P=0.023] versus 0.95±1.90 [P<0.001]), all-cause hospitalizations (0.19±0.69 versus 0.24±0.72 [P=0.002] versus 0.34±1.16 [P<0.001]), and cardiac-related hospitalizations (0.06±0.26 versus 0.09±0.41 [P=0.023] versus 0.10±0.44 [P=0.004]) were significantly lower in adherent versus intermediate and nonadherent patients, as were all-cause inpatient costs ($2200±$8054 versus $3274±$12 065 [P=0.002] versus $4483±$16 499 [P<0.001]). All-cause emergency department costs were significantly lower in adherent and intermediate versus nonadherent patients ($499±$1229 and $563±$1292 versus $691±$1652 [P<0.001 and P=0.002], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest clinical and economic benefits of PAP therapy in patients with concomitant OSA and atrial fibrillation. This supports the value of diagnosing and managing OSA and highlights the need for strategies to enhance PAP adherence in this population.


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Presión de las Vías Aéreas Positiva Contínua , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño , Humanos , Femenino , Fibrilación Atrial/terapia , Fibrilación Atrial/economía , Fibrilación Atrial/epidemiología , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/terapia , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/economía , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/epidemiología , Presión de las Vías Aéreas Positiva Contínua/economía , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Recursos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Recursos en Salud/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Cooperación del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
Front Public Health ; 12: 1329768, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38737867

RESUMEN

Objectives: This study aimed to analyze the influencing factors of hospitalization cost of hypertensive patients in TCM (traditional Chinese medicine, TCM) hospitals, which can provide a scientific basis for hospitals to control the hospitalization cost of hypertension. Methods: In this study, 3,595 hospitalized patients with a primary diagnosis of tertiary hypertension in Tianshui City Hospital of TCM, Gansu Province, China, from January 2017 to June 2022, were used as research subjects. Using univariate analysis to identify the relevant variables of hospitalization cost, followed by incorporating the statistically significant variables of univariate analysis as independent variables in multiple linear regression analysis, and establishing the path model based on the results of the multiple linear regression finally, to explore the factors influencing hospitalization cost comprehensively. Results: The results showed that hospitalization cost of hypertension patients were mainly influenced by length of stay, age, admission pathways, payment methods of medical insurance, and visit times, with length of stay being the most critical factor. Conclusion: The Chinese government should actively exert the characteristics and advantages of TCM in the treatment of chronic diseases such as hypertension, consistently optimize the treatment plans of TCM, effectively reduce the length of stay and steadily improve the health literacy level of patients, to alleviate the illnesses pain and reduce the economic burden of patients.


Asunto(s)
Hospitalización , Hipertensión , Medicina Tradicional China , Humanos , Femenino , Hipertensión/economía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medicina Tradicional China/economía , Medicina Tradicional China/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , China , Anciano , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Adulto , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos
7.
Health Res Policy Syst ; 22(1): 57, 2024 May 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38741196

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Indigenous populations have increased risk of developing diabetes and experience poorer treatment outcomes than the general population. The FORGE AHEAD program partnered with First Nations communities across Canada to improve access to resources by developing community-driven primary healthcare models. METHODS: This was an economic assessment of FORGE AHEAD using a payer perspective. Costs of diabetes management and complications during the 18-month intervention were compared to the costs prior to intervention implementation. Cost-effectiveness of the program assessed incremental differences in cost and number of resources utilization events (pre and post). Primary outcome was all-cause hospitalizations. Secondary outcomes were specialist visits, clinic visits and community resource use. Data were obtained from a diabetes registry and published literature. Costs are expressed in 2023 Can$. RESULTS: Study population was ~ 60.5 years old; 57.2% female; median duration of diabetes of 8 years; 87.5% residing in non-isolated communities; 75% residing in communities < 5000 members. Total cost of implementation was $1,221,413.60 and cost/person $27.89. There was increase in the number and cost of hospitalizations visits from 8/$68,765.85 (pre period) to 243/$2,735,612.37. Specialist visits, clinic visits and community resource use followed this trend. CONCLUSION: Considering the low cost of intervention and increased care access, FORGE AHEAD represents a successful community-driven partnership resulting in improved access to resources.


Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Diabetes Mellitus , Servicios de Salud del Indígena , Hospitalización , Atención Primaria de Salud , Humanos , Atención Primaria de Salud/economía , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hospitalización/economía , Canadá , Servicios de Salud del Indígena/economía , Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Atención a la Salud/economía , Anciano , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Indígenas Norteamericanos , Pueblos Indígenas , Adulto , Complicaciones de la Diabetes/terapia , Complicaciones de la Diabetes/economía
8.
Ital J Dermatol Venerol ; 159(2): 182-189, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38650498

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This real-world analysis aimed at characterizing patients hospitalized for alopecia areata (AA) in Italy, focusing on comorbidities, treatment patterns and the economic burden for disease management. METHODS: Administrative databases of healthcare entities covering 8.9 million residents were retrospectively browsed to include patients of all ages with hospitalization discharge diagnosis for AA from 2010 to 2020. The population was characterized during the year before the first AA-related hospitalization (index-date) and followed-up for all the available successive period. AA drug prescriptions and treatment discontinuation were analyzed during follow-up. Healthcare costs were also examined. RESULTS: Among 252 patients with AA (mean age 32.1 years, 40.9% males), the most common comorbidities were thyroid disease (22.2%) and hypertension (21.8%), consistent with literature; only 44.4% (112/252) received therapy for AA, more frequently with prednisone, triamcinolone and clobetasol. Treatment discontinuation (no prescriptions during the last trimester) was observed in 86% and 88% of patients, respectively at 12 and 24-month after therapy initiation. Overall healthcare costs were 1715€ per patient (rising to 2143€ in the presence of comorbidities), mostly driven by hospitalization and drugs expenses. CONCLUSIONS: This first real-world description of hospitalized AA patients in Italy confirmed the youth and female predominance of this population, in line with international data. The large use of corticosteroids over other systemic therapies followed the Italian guidelines, but the high discontinuation rates suggest an unmet need for further treatment options. Lastly, the analysis of healthcare expenses indicated that hospitalizations and drugs were the most impactive cost items.


Asunto(s)
Alopecia Areata , Hospitalización , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Alopecia Areata/epidemiología , Alopecia Areata/economía , Alopecia Areata/terapia , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Persona de Mediana Edad , Niño , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Comorbilidad , Preescolar , Enfermedades de la Tiroides/epidemiología , Enfermedades de la Tiroides/economía , Enfermedades de la Tiroides/terapia , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipertensión/economía , Anciano
9.
Front Public Health ; 12: 1226884, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38651130

RESUMEN

Background: With the rapid aging of the population, the health needs of the older adult have increased significantly, resulting in the frequent occurrence of the "social hospitalization" problem, which has led to a rapid increase in hospitalization costs. This study investigates whether the "social hospitalization problem" arising from the long-term care needs can be solved through the implementation of long-term care insurance, thereby improving the overall health of the older adults and controlling the unreasonable increase in hospitalization costs. Methods: The entropy theory was used as a conceptual model, based on data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) in 2015 and 2018. The least-squares method was used to examine the relationship between long-term care needs and hospitalization costs, and the role that long-term care insurance implementation plays in its path of influence. Results: The results of this study indicated that long-term care needs would increase hospitalization cost, which remained stable after a series of tests, such as replacing the core explanatory variables and introducing fixed effects. Through the intermediary effect test and mediated adjustment effect test, we found the action path of long-term care needs on hospitalization costs. Long-term care needs increases hospitalization costs through more hospitalizations. Long-term care insurance reduces hospitalization costs. Its specific action path makes long-term care insurance reduce hospitalization costs through a negative adjustment of the number of hospitalizations. Conclusion: To achieve fair and sustainable development of long-term care insurance, the following points should be achieved: First, long-term care insurance should consider the prevention in advance and expand the scope of participation and coverage; Second, long-term care insurance should consider the control in the event and set moderate levels of treatment payments; Third, long-term care insurance should consider post-supervision and explore appropriate payment methods.


Asunto(s)
Hospitalización , Seguro de Cuidados a Largo Plazo , Cuidados a Largo Plazo , Humanos , Seguro de Cuidados a Largo Plazo/economía , Seguro de Cuidados a Largo Plazo/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Femenino , Masculino , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/economía , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Longitudinales , China , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Transversales , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/economía
10.
Viruses ; 16(4)2024 Mar 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38675850

RESUMEN

Respiratory viral infections (RVIs) are common reasons for healthcare consultations. The inpatient management of RVIs consumes significant resources. From 2009 to 2014, we assessed the costs of RVI management in 4776 hospitalized children aged 0-18 years participating in a quality improvement program, where all ILI patients underwent virologic testing at the National Reference Centre followed by detailed recording of their clinical course. The direct (medical or non-medical) and indirect costs of inpatient management outside the ICU ('non-ICU') versus management requiring ICU care ('ICU') added up to EUR 2767.14 (non-ICU) vs. EUR 29,941.71 (ICU) for influenza, EUR 2713.14 (non-ICU) vs. EUR 16,951.06 (ICU) for RSV infections, and EUR 2767.33 (non-ICU) vs. EUR 14,394.02 (ICU) for human rhinovirus (hRV) infections, respectively. Non-ICU inpatient costs were similar for all eight RVIs studied: influenza, RSV, hRV, adenovirus (hAdV), metapneumovirus (hMPV), parainfluenza virus (hPIV), bocavirus (hBoV), and seasonal coronavirus (hCoV) infections. ICU costs for influenza, however, exceeded all other RVIs. At the time of the study, influenza was the only RVI with antiviral treatment options available for children, but only 9.8% of influenza patients (non-ICU) and 1.5% of ICU patients with influenza received antivirals; only 2.9% were vaccinated. Future studies should investigate the economic impact of treatment and prevention of influenza, COVID-19, and RSV post vaccine introduction.


Asunto(s)
Costo de Enfermedad , Hospitalización , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio , Humanos , Preescolar , Niño , Lactante , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/economía , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/virología , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/terapia , Alemania/epidemiología , Adolescente , Masculino , Femenino , Recién Nacido , Hospitalización/economía , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/economía , COVID-19/terapia , Pacientes Internos , Virosis/economía , Virosis/terapia , SARS-CoV-2 , Costos de la Atención en Salud
11.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 20(1): 2343199, 2024 Dec 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38647026

RESUMEN

The "reemergence of pertussis" has elicited international concerns, occurring paradoxically amidst the expansion of immunization programs. This study was aimed to evaluate quantitatively the economic burden and identify the determinants that influence the cost associated with treating pertussis in Chinese children. We evaluated the economic burden by Chinese children diagnosed with pertussis at the Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine in 2022. Direct medical expenses and the utilization of medical resources attributed to pertussis were calculated. A generalized linear regression model was applied to analyze the determinants that were associated with the direct medical expenses among patients. Among the 1110 pertussis patients included in the study, 1060 were outpatients and 50 were inpatients. The average direct medical cost was ¥1878.70(i.e. $279.33). Living in urban areas (OR:1.27, p = .04), complications (OR:1.40, p < .001), hospitalization (OR:10.04, p < .001), and ≥ 3 medical visits (OR:3.71, p < .001) were associated with increased direct medical expenses. Having received four doses of the pertussis vaccine was associated with reduced direct medical expenses (OR:0.81, p = .04). This study underscores a substantial economic burden of pertussis in Hangzhou, with pronounced implications for patients residing in urban areas, experiencing complications, requiring hospitalization, having multiple medical consultations, or lacking comprehensive pertussis vaccination.


Asunto(s)
Costo de Enfermedad , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Hospitalización , Vacuna contra la Tos Ferina , Tos Ferina , Humanos , Tos Ferina/economía , Tos Ferina/epidemiología , Tos Ferina/prevención & control , China/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Preescolar , Lactante , Niño , Vacuna contra la Tos Ferina/economía , Vacuna contra la Tos Ferina/administración & dosificación , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Vacunación/economía
12.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(4): e247519, 2024 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38648059

RESUMEN

Importance: The health outcomes of increased poverty and inequalities in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) have been substantially amplified as a consequence of converging multiple crises. Brazil has some of the world's largest conditional cash transfer (Programa Bolsa Família [PBF]), social pension (Beneficio de Prestacão Continuada [BPC]), and primary health care (Estratégia de Saúde da Família [ESF]) programs that could act as mitigating interventions during the current polycrisis era of increasing poverty, slow or contracting economic growth, and conflicts. Objective: To evaluate the combined association of the Brazilian conditional cash transfer, social pension, and primary health care programs with the reduction of morbidity and mortality over the last 2 decades and forecast their potential mitigation of the current global polycrisis and beyond. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used a longitudinal ecological design with multivariable negative binomial regression models (adjusted for relevant socioeconomic, demographic, and health care variables) integrating the retrospective analysis from 2000 to 2019, with dynamic microsimulation models to forecast potential child mortality scenarios up to 2030. Participants included a cohort of 2548 Brazilian municipalities from 2004 to 2019, projected from 2020 to 2030. Data analysis was performed from September 2022 to February 2023. Exposure: PBF coverage of the target population (those who were poorest) was categorized into 4 levels: low (0%-29.9%), intermediate (30.0%-69.9%), high (70.0%-99.9%), and consolidated (≥100%). ESF coverage was categorized as null (0), low (0.1%-29.9%), intermediate (30.0%-69.9%), and consolidated (70.0%-100%). BPC coverage was categorized by terciles. Main outcomes and measures: Age-standardized, all-cause mortality and hospitalization rates calculated for the entire population and by age group (<5 years, 5-29 years, 30-69 years, and ≥70 years). Results: Among the 2548 Brazilian municipalities studied from 2004 to 2019, the mean (SD) age-standardized mortality rate decreased by 16.64% (from 6.73 [1.14] to 5.61 [0.94] deaths per 1000 population). Consolidated coverages of social welfare programs studied were all associated with reductions in overall mortality rates (PBF: rate ratio [RR], 0.95 [95% CI, 0.94-0.96]; ESF: RR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.93-0.94]; BPC: RR, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.91-0.92]), having all together prevented an estimated 1 462 626 (95% CI, 1 332 128-1 596 924) deaths over the period 2004 to 2019. The results were higher on mortality for the group younger than age 5 years (PBF: RR, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.85-0.90]; ESF: RR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.87-0.93]; BPC: RR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.82-0.86]), on mortality for the group aged 70 years and older, and on hospitalizations. Considering a shorter scenario of economic crisis, a mitigation strategy that will increase the coverage of PBF, BPC, and ESF to proportionally cover the newly poor and at-risk individuals was projected to avert 1 305 359 (95% CI, 1 163 659-1 449 256) deaths and 6 593 224 (95% CI, 5 534 591-7 651 327) hospitalizations up to 2030, compared with fiscal austerity scenarios that would reduce the coverage of these interventions. Conclusions and relevance: This cohort study's results suggest that combined expansion of conditional cash transfers, social pensions, and primary health care should be considered a viable strategy to mitigate the adverse health outcomes of the current global polycrisis in LMICs, whereas the implementation of fiscal austerity measures could result in large numbers of preventable deaths.


Asunto(s)
Hospitalización , Pensiones , Atención Primaria de Salud , Humanos , Brasil/epidemiología , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Primaria de Salud/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/tendencias , Femenino , Masculino , Pensiones/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Preescolar , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adolescente , Niño , Mortalidad/tendencias , Adulto Joven , Lactante , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano , Estudios Longitudinales , Pobreza/estadística & datos numéricos
13.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 24(1): 507, 2024 Apr 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38659025

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hospitalizations for ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSC) incur substantial costs on the health system that could be partially avoided with adequate outpatient care. Complications of chronic diseases, such as diabetes mellitus (DM), are considered ACSC. Previous studies have shown that hospitalizations due to diabetes have a significant financial burden. In Mexico, DM is a major health concern and a leading cause of death, but there is limited evidence available. This study aimed to estimate the direct costs of hospitalizations by DM-related ACSC in the Mexican public health system. METHODS: We selected three hospitals from each of Mexico's main public institutions: the Mexican Social Security Institute (IMSS), the Ministry of Health (MoH), and the Institute of Social Security and Services for State Workers (ISSSTE). We employed a bottom-up microcosting approach from the healthcare provider perspective to estimate the total direct costs of hospitalizations for DM-related ACSC. Input data regarding length of stay (LoS), consultations, medications, colloid/crystalloid solutions, procedures, and laboratory/medical imaging studies were obtained from clinical records of a random sample of 532 hospitalizations out of a total of 1,803 DM-related ACSC (ICD-10 codes) discharges during 2016. RESULTS: The average cost per DM-related ACSC hospitalization varies among institutions, ranging from $1,427 in the MoH to $1,677 in the IMSS and $1,754 in the ISSSTE. The three institutions' largest expenses are LoS and procedures. Peripheral circulatory and renal complications were the major drivers of hospitalization costs for patients with DM-related ACSC. Direct costs due to hospitalizations for DM-related ACSC in these three institutions represent 1% of the gross domestic product (GDP) dedicated to health and social services and 2% of total hospital care expenses. CONCLUSIONS: The direct costs of hospitalizations for DM-related ACSC vary considerably across institutions. Disparities in such costs for the same ACSC among different institutions suggest potential disparities in care quality across primary and hospital settings (processes and resource utilization), which should be further investigated to ensure optimal supply utilization. Prioritizing preventive measures for peripheral circulatory and renal complications in DM patients could be highly beneficial.


Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria , Diabetes Mellitus , Hospitalización , Humanos , México , Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Diabetes Mellitus/economía , Atención Ambulatoria/economía , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto Joven
14.
Med Care ; 62(6): 396-403, 2024 Jun 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38598671

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The provision of high-quality hospital care requires adequate space, buildings, and equipment, although redundant infrastructure could also drive service overprovision. OBJECTIVE: To explore the distribution of physical hospital resources-that is, capital assets-in the United States; its correlation with indicators of community health and nonhealth factors; and the association between hospital capital density and regional hospital utilization and costs. RESEARCH DESIGN: We created a dataset of n=1733 US counties by analyzing the 2019 Medicare Cost Reports; 2019 State Inpatient Database Community Inpatient Statistics; 2020-2021 Area Health Resource File; 2016-2020 American Community Survey; 2022 PLACES; and 2019 CDC WONDER. We first calculated aggregate hospital capital assets and investment at the county level. Next, we examined the correlation between community's medical need (eg, chronic disease prevalence), ability to pay (eg, insurance), and supply factors with 4 metrics of capital availability. Finally, we examined the association between capital assets and hospital utilization/costs, adjusted for confounders. RESULTS: Counties with older and sicker populations generally had less aggregate hospital capital per capita, per hospital day, and per hospital discharge, while counties with higher income or insurance coverage had more hospital capital. In linear regressions controlling for medical need and ability to pay, capital assets were associated with greater hospital utilization and costs, for example, an additional $1000 in capital assets per capita was associated with 73 additional discharges per 100,000 population (95% CI: 45-102) and $19 in spending per bed day (95% CI: 12-26). CONCLUSIONS: The level of investment in hospitals is linked to community wealth but not population health needs, and may drive use and costs.


Asunto(s)
Hospitalización , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/economía , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicare/economía , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud Pública/economía
15.
Adv Ther ; 41(5): 1860-1884, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38466558

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a debilitating and costly condition. This analysis characterized the health-related quality of life (HRQoL), health care resource utilization (HCRU), and costs between patients with versus without MDD, and across MDD severity levels. METHODS: The 2019 National Health and Wellness Survey was used to identify adults with MDD, who were stratified by disease severity (minimal/mild, moderate, moderately severe, severe), and those without MDD. Outcomes included HRQoL (Short Form-36v2 Health Survey, EuroQol Five-Dimension Visual Analogue Scale, utility scores), HCRU (hospitalizations, emergency department [ED] visits, health care provider [HCP] visits), and annualized average direct medical and indirect (workplace) costs. A subgroup analysis was conducted in participants with MDD and prior medication treatment failure. Participant characteristics and study outcomes were evaluated using bivariate analyses and multivariable regression models, respectively. RESULTS: Cohorts comprised 10,710 participants with MDD (minimal/mild = 5905; moderate = 2206; moderately severe = 1565; severe = 1034) and 52,687 participants without MDD. Participants with MDD had significantly lower HRQoL scores than those without (each comparison, P < 0.001). Increasing MDD severity was associated with decreasing HRQoL. Relative to participants without MDD, participants with MDD reported more HCP visits (2.72 vs 5.64; P < 0.001) and ED visits (0.18 vs 0.22; P < 0.001) but a similar number of hospitalizations. HCRU increased with increasing MDD severity. Although most patients with MDD had minimal/mild to moderate severity, total direct medical and indirect costs were significantly higher for participants with versus without MDD ($8814 vs $6072 and $5425 vs $3085, respectively, both P < 0.001). Direct and indirect costs were significantly higher across all severity levels versus minimal/mild MDD (each comparison, P < 0.05). Among patients with prior MDD medication treatment failure (n = 1077), increasing severity was associated with significantly lower HRQoL and higher total indirect costs than minimal/mild MDD. CONCLUSION: These results quantify the significant and diverse burdens associated with MDD and prior MDD medication treatment failure.


This study described the burdens associated with major depressive disorder. To accomplish this, we compared outcomes from a national health survey between patients who had a diagnosis of major depressive disorder and those who did not. Participants with major depressive disorder were further characterized by the severity of their symptoms. The first outcome was health-related quality of life and the second outcome was the amount of health visits, such as the number of hospitalizations, emergency department visits, and visits with health care providers. Finally, health care-related costs and workplace-related costs were evaluated. Survey participants with major depressive disorder had lower health-related quality of life scores compared with those without major depressive disorder. Increasing severity of major depressive disorder was linked with decreasing health-related quality of life. Participants with major depressive disorder also reported more health care provider and emergency department visits relative to participants without the disorder, although they both reported a similar number of hospitalizations. Both health care-related and workplace-related costs were higher in participants with major depressive disorder than in those without major depressive disorder, and costs were higher among participants with more severe symptoms compared with minimal/mild symptoms. Among participants who had major depressive disorder and reported that their current medication had replaced an old medication because of a lack of response, increasing major depressive disorder severity was associated with significantly lower health-related quality of life scores and higher total workplace-related costs versus minimal/mild major depressive disorder.


Asunto(s)
Costo de Enfermedad , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/economía , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos
16.
JACC Clin Electrophysiol ; 10(4): 718-730, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38430088

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Integrating patient-specific cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED)-detected atrial fibrillation (AF) burden with measures of health care cost and utilization allows for an accurate assessment of the AF-related impact on health care use. OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to assess the incremental cost of device-recognized AF vs no AF; compare relative costs of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (pAF), persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF), and permanent atrial fibrillation (PermAF) AF; and evaluate rates and sources of health care utilization between cohorts. METHODS: Using the de-identified Optum Clinformatics U.S. claims database (2015-2020) linked with the Medtronic CareLink database, CIED patients were identified who transmitted data ≥6 months postimplantation. Annualized per-patient costs in follow-up were analyzed from insurance claims and adjusted to 2020 U.S. dollars. Costs and rates of health care utilization were compared between patients with no AF and those with device-recognized pAF, PeAF, and PermAF. Analyses were adjusted for geographical region, insurance type, CHA2DS2-VASc score, and implantation year. RESULTS: Of 21,391 patients (mean age 72.9 ± 10.9 years; 56.3% male) analyzed, 7,798 (36.5%) had device-recognized AF. The incremental annualized increased cost in those with AF was $12,789 ± $161,749 per patient, driven by increased rates of health care encounters, adverse clinical events associated with AF, and AF-specific interventions. Among those with AF, PeAF was associated with the highest cost, driven by increased rates of inpatient and outpatient hospitalization encounters, heart failure hospitalizations, and AF-specific interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Presence of device-recognized AF was associated with increased health care cost. Among those with AF, patients with PeAF had the highest health care costs. Mechanisms for cost differentials include both disease-specific consequences and physician-directed interventions.


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Humanos , Fibrilación Atrial/economía , Fibrilación Atrial/terapia , Masculino , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos , Desfibriladores Implantables/economía , Desfibriladores Implantables/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Costo de Enfermedad , Anciano de 80 o más Años
17.
Int J Infect Dis ; 143: 107023, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38555060

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical and economic outcomes in adults hospitalized with invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) and noninvasive all-cause pneumonia (ACP) overall and by antimicrobial resistance (AMR) status. METHODS: Hospitalized adults from the BD Insights Research Database with an ICD10 code for IPD, noninvasive ACP or a positive Streptococcus pneumoniae culture/urine antigen test were included. Descriptive statistics and multivariable analyses were used to evaluate outcomes (in-hospital mortality, length of stay [LOS], cost per admission, and hospital margin [costs - payments]). RESULTS: The study included 88,182 adult patients at 90 US hospitals (October 2015-February 2020). Most (98.6%) had noninvasive ACP and 40.2% were <65 years old. Of 1450 culture-positive patients, 37.7% had an isolate resistant to ≥1 antibiotic class. Observed mortality, median LOS, cost per admission, and hospital margins were 8.3%, 6 days, $9791, and $11, respectively. Risk factors for mortality included ≥50 years of age, higher risk of pneumococcal disease (based on chronic or immunocompromising conditions), and intensive care unit admission. Patients with IPD had similar mortality rates and hospital margins compared with noninvasive ACP, but greater costs per admission and LOS. CONCLUSION: IPD and noninvasive ACP are associated with substantial clinical and economic burden across all adult age groups. Expanded pneumococcal vaccination programs may help reduce disease burden and decrease hospital costs.


Asunto(s)
Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitalización , Tiempo de Internación , Infecciones Neumocócicas , Streptococcus pneumoniae , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto , Infecciones Neumocócicas/economía , Infecciones Neumocócicas/mortalidad , Infecciones Neumocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Neumocócicas/microbiología , Infecciones Neumocócicas/epidemiología , Hospitalización/economía , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Costo de Enfermedad , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/economía , Adulto Joven , Factores de Riesgo , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neumonía Neumocócica/economía , Neumonía Neumocócica/mortalidad , Neumonía Neumocócica/microbiología , Adolescente
18.
Colorectal Dis ; 26(4): 692-701, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38353528

RESUMEN

AIM: Financial toxicity describes the financial burden and distress that patients experience due to medical treatment. Financial toxicity has yet to be characterized among patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) undergoing surgical management of their disease. This study investigated the risk of financial toxicity associated with undergoing surgery for IBD. METHODS: This study used a retrospective analysis using the National Inpatient Sample from 2015 to 2019. Adult patients who underwent IBD-related surgery were identified using the International Classification of Diseases (10th Revision) diagnostic and procedure codes and stratified into privately insured and uninsured groups. The primary outcome was risk of financial toxicity, defined as hospital admission charges that constituted 40% or more of patient's post-subsistence income. Secondary outcomes included total hospital admission cost and predictors of financial toxicity. RESULTS: The analytical cohort consisted of 6412 privately insured and 3694 uninsured patients. Overall median hospital charges were $21 628 (interquartile range $14 758-$35 386). Risk of financial toxicity was 86.5% among uninsured patients and 0% among insured patients. Predictors of financial toxicity included emergency admission, being in the lowest residential income quartile and having ulcerative colitis (compared to Crohn's disease). Additional predictors were being of Black race or male sex. CONCLUSION: Financial toxicity is a serious consequence of IBD-related surgery among uninsured patients. Given the pervasive nature of this consequence, future steps to support uninsured patients receiving surgery, in particular emergency surgery, related to their IBD are needed to protect this group from financial risk.


Asunto(s)
Precios de Hospital , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino , Pacientes no Asegurados , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Pacientes no Asegurados/estadística & datos numéricos , Precios de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/cirugía , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/economía , Colitis Ulcerosa/cirugía , Colitis Ulcerosa/economía , Costo de Enfermedad , Enfermedad de Crohn/cirugía , Enfermedad de Crohn/economía , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro de Salud/economía , Estrés Financiero/economía , Anciano , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos
19.
Value Health Reg Issues ; 41: 114-122, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38325244

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine the hospital service utilization patterns and direct healthcare hospital costs before and during peritoneal dialysis (PD) at home. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients with kidney failure (KF) was conducted at a Mexican Social Security Institute hospital for the year 2014. Cost categories included inpatient emergency room stays, inpatient services at internal medicine or surgery, and hospital PD. The study groups were (1) patients with KF before initiating home PD, (2) patients with less than 1 year of home PD (incident), and (3) patients with more than 1 year of home PD (prevalent). Costs were actualized to international dollars (Int$) 2023. RESULTS: We found that 53% of patients with KF used home PD services, 42% had not received any type of PD, and 5% had hospital dialysis while waiting for home PD. The estimated costs adjusting for age and sex were Int$5339 (95% CI 4680-9746) for patients without home PD, Int$17 556 (95% CI 15 314-19 789) for incident patients, and Int$7872 (95% CI 5994-9749) for prevalent patients; with significantly different averages for the 3 groups (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Although the use of services and cost is highest at the time of initiating PD, over time, using home PD leads to a significant reduction in use of hospital services, which translates into institutional cost savings. Our findings, especially considering the high rates of KF in Mexico, suggest a pressing need for interventions that can reduce healthcare costs at the beginning of renal replacement therapy.


Asunto(s)
Hospitalización , Diálisis Peritoneal , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , México , Diálisis Peritoneal/economía , Diálisis Peritoneal/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Insuficiencia Renal/terapia , Insuficiencia Renal/economía , Insuficiencia Renal/epidemiología , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hemodiálisis en el Domicilio/economía , Hemodiálisis en el Domicilio/estadística & datos numéricos , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Fallo Renal Crónico/economía
20.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 82(5): 554-562, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38403271

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of consensus on the optimal triage pathway for emergency department (ED) patients with mandibular fractures. It remains unclear if patient insurance payers predict hospital admission given potentially competing logistical and health system incentives. PURPOSE: To generate nationally representative estimates of the frequency of hospital admission and its association with primary insurance payers for ED patients with mandible fractures. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used the 2018 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample, the largest all-payer database in the United States, to identify patients with mandible fractures. The database includes a stratified sample with discharge weights to generate nationally representative estimates. Patients with other facial fractures and/or concomitant injuries that independently warranted admission were excluded. PREDICTOR: The primary predictor variable was primary payer (public, private, self-pay, and other/no charge). OUTCOME VARIABLE: The primary outcome variable was hospital admission (yes/no). COVARIATES: Covariates included patient-, medical/injury-, and hospital-related variables. ANALYSES: Descriptive statistics, along with bivariate and multivariate logistic regression with Bonferroni correction, were used to produce national estimates and identify predictors of admission. P < .01 was considered significant. RESULTS: The cohort included 27,238 weighted encounters involving isolated mandible fractures, of which 5,345(20%) were admitted. The payers for admitted patients were 46% public, 25% private, 22% self-pay, and 7% no charge/other. In bivariate analyses, public insurance was associated with a higher likelihood of admission than private insurance (RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.45), though there was no association in the multivariate model (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.28). In multivariate analysis, higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.48), alcohol-related disorder (OR 3.47, 95% CI 2.74 to 4.39), substance-related disorder (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.20 to 1.71), and more mandible fractures (OR 3.08, 95% CI 2.65 to 3.59) were associated with admission. Compared to body fractures, subcondylar (OR 3.83, 95% CI 2.39 to 6.14), angle (OR 3.53, 95% CI 2.84 to 6.09), and symphysis (OR 4.14, 95% CI 2.84 to 6.09) fractures had higher odds of admission. Finally, level I (OR 4.11, 95% CI 2.41 to 6.98) and level II (OR 3.16, 95% CI 1.85 to 5.39) trauma centers had higher odds of admission. CONCLUSIONS: In 2018, 20% of ED patients with isolated mandible fractures were admitted. Several patient and hospital characteristics were predictors of admission. Insurance status was not associated with admission.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Fracturas Mandibulares , Humanos , Fracturas Mandibulares/economía , Fracturas Mandibulares/epidemiología , Fracturas Mandibulares/terapia , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Masculino , Estados Unidos , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/economía , Anciano , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Cobertura del Seguro/estadística & datos numéricos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...