Efficacy and safety of iloprost in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of iloprost in treating pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is controversial. Adverse reactions such as hypotension may occur during treatment. OBJECTIVES: Aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of iloprost for PAH. METHODS: Studies were obtained from an electronic search of the CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, SinoMed, PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases up to May 18, 2023. A meta-analysis of each study was performed using RevMan 5.4 with a 95 % confidence interval (CI). A randomized or fixed-effects model was applied according to a heterogeneity test. RESULTS: Twelve trials involving 718 participants were selected, including 433 in five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 285 in seven prospective clinical trials. All the patients received iloprost inhalation. The short- and prolonged treatment groups significantly improved the 6-minute walking distance (6 MWD). The mortality and clinical deterioration incidences in the iloprost group were not significantly different from those in the control group. The mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) was reduced after 3 months of iloprost RCTs and 12 months of prospective treatment. Iloprost decreased pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) by approximately 231.29 units, significantly increased cardiac output (CO), and improved the quality of life (QoL). The main adverse reactions to iloprost treatment were cough (17 %), headache (16.4 %), and flushing (12.4 %). CONCLUSION: Iloprost, either used alone or as adjuvant therapy, can enhance exercise capacity, lower hemodynamic parameters, and improve long-term outcomes. However, the risk of mortality and clinical deterioration remains unknown.

Effects of iloprost in patients with critical limb ischemia: Results of a cohort study from the COPART registry.

BACKGROUND: Iloprost has been proposed as an alternative to amputation in Critical Limb Ischemia (CLI) patients when revascularization was unsuccessful or not possible. Nonetheless, there is limited evidence of its benefit. The main objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of iloprost and the secondary objective was to evaluate its safety. METHODS: In this cohort study including CLI patients from the COPART registry from 2006/10 to 2021/01, patients exposed to iloprost were matched with up to three unexposed patients according to age, sex, and Propensity Score (PS) for exposure to iloprost. The main outcome combined the occurrence of all-cause death and major amputations; survival was assessed over one-year using Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox model analyses. Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE) were chosen as the safety outcome; the association with iloprost was estimated using a logistic regression model. RESULTS: Among 1850 CLI patients, 201 were exposed to iloprost (71.6% men; median age: 72 years vs. 72.1%; 75 years for unexposed). In 134 exposed patients matched to 375 unexposed patients, 14 major amputations and 24 deaths occurred in exposed patients (28.4%) vs. 33 and 46 respectively in the unexposed patients (20.9%). The hazard ratio (HR) was of 1.49 (95% Confidence Interval: 1.01-2.20). The association remained in the subgroup of "no option" patients (HR: 1.74; [1.01-2.20]). Regarding safety, 21/201 (10.7%) exposed patients experienced MACE vs. 146/1649 (9.41%) unexposed patients (unadjusted Odds Ratio [OR]: 1.17 [0.72-1.90]; adjusted OR: 1.23 [0.72-2.11]). CONCLUSION: The study did not find any benefit of iloprost in CLI patients and even suggested a deleterious effect.

Real life use of prostacyclin analog (iloprost), a multi-centric survey data from the Scleroderma study group Emilia Romagna (Sclero-RER) and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Iloprost is recommend worldwide for the treatment of RP and the healing of DUs. The aim of this study is to report the regimens of Iloprost administered in different rheumatological centers within the same regional Health System Methods: A questionnaire exploring different items related to the use of Iloprost was developed and reviewed by three expert rheumatologists. The questionnaire was distributed as an online survey to all local SSc referral centers in Emilia-Romagna (Italy). Data are reported as percentage or median with interquartile range (IQR), as appropriate. An updated review of world literature on this topic was also carried out. RESULTS: All the invited centers completed the survey. There were both local (8) and university hospitals (4). The majority (58%) had a rheumatologist as head physician. All centers used Iloprost: a single monthly administration was the most common treatment (75%). The cycle lasted 1 [IQR 1-2] days with a 0.5-2.0 ng/Kg/min dose according to the drug tolerance of the patients. There were overall 68 spots (beds, reclining armchair, or simple armchair); 2.0 [1.5-4.0] patients were able to receive Iloprost at the same time. University Hospitals had more physicians at their disposal than local hospitals but less paramedic personnel (respectively: 1.8 vs 1.2 physicians, 1.5 vs 2.1 nurses). CONCLUSIONS: These observations were in line with the majority of previous studies reporting different regimens, comparing similar (but not identical) dose and schedule administration, however, despite differences being at times substantial, no standard infusion method is yet available.

Incidence of Bloodstream Infection in Patients with Pulmonary Hypertension under Intravenous Epoprostenol or Iloprost-A Multicentre, Retrospective Study.

Intravenous synthetic prostacyclin analogs (iPCAs), such as epoprostenol, treprostinil and iloprost have been widely used for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Despite having good outcomes, continuous infusion of iPCAs has been associated with some adverse effects. Bloodstream infection (BSI) is one of the most severe complications, although poorly recognized, especially under iloprost administration, which few studies have addressed. This study aimed to compare the BSI incidence rates between intravenous iloprost and epoprostenol administration. Patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH) functional class III or IV receiving intravenous iloprost or epoprostenol through Hickman catheter, between 2004 and 2019, were retrospectively selected from two PH treatment centers. From a total of 36 patients (13 for iloprost and 23 for epoprostenol), 75% (n = 27) fulfilled the PAH criteria, mainly belonging to the idiopathic group. Overall BSI rate was 1.5/1000 days of treatment (3.38 and 0.09/1000 days for iloprost and epoprostenol, respectively). Patients receiving iloprost were at a higher risk of developing BSI than those receiving epoprostenol (HR: 12.5; 95% CI: 1.569-99.092). A higher mortality rate from BSI was also identified in the iloprost group (p = 0.04). Twenty-seven patients developed BSI, with 92% of them requiring hospitalization. A total of 29 agents were found, 10 Gram-positive (mainly Staphylococcus aureus; n = 5) and 19 Gram-negative (mainly Pseudomonas aeruginosa; n = 6) bacteria. Iloprost administration was linked to a significantly higher incidence of BSI, worse prognosis, and more BSI-related deaths than epoprostenol. BSI due to Gram-negative, commensal, low-virulence bacteria was also higher in the iloprost group. In short, physicians should be aware when prescribing iPCA to guarantee their patients' safety and best medical care.

The safety and persistence of intravenous iloprost in systemic sclerosis.

INTRODUCTION: Vasculopathy is a crucial feature of systemic sclerosis (SSc). It occurs in almost every patient with SSc, with Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) and digital ulcers (DU) having a great impact on the quality of patients' lives. Intravenous (IV) iloprost, a synthetic analogue of prostacyclin, is broadly used to treat RP and DU secondary to SSc. Currently, there is no standard protocol defined for the iloprost treatment of SSc-associated RP and DU, and, consequently, the management of this treatment is largely based on each centre's experience. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety profile of a particular scheme of IV iloprost used in our centre as the standard treatment of SSc-related vascular complications. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the clinical records of SSc patients, classified according to the 2013 European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) criteria (31) with SSc-related DU and/or severe RP not responsive to CCB, receiving or who have received IV iloprost infusions from January 1st 2011 to March 31st 2021 Results: Within this time frame, 60 patients (n=44 for DU; n=16 for severe RP) were treated with a monthly 10-hour IV iloprost perfusion with a dosing regimen adapted to individual tolerance. Forty-nine of these 60 patients (81.7%) were on iloprost for more than one year. Within 12 months of therapy, 40 patients have healed the DUs (90.9%), with only 4 patients maintaining active DUs. A significant clinical improvement in RP at 12 months was observed in 87.5% (n=14/16) of SSc patients with severe RP. Eleven AE implying treatment dose/frequency adjustments or suspension were recorded (18.3% of patients): severe headache (n=5), hypotension (n=3), tachycardia (n=1), flushing (n=1) and generalised erythroderma (n=1). In all patients, the perfusion rate was reduced in the following treatment sessions with good tolerance, with the exception of the patient with the generalised erythroderma reaction, who suspended the perfusion and was later switched to bosentan. After a mean follow-up time of 6.9 (+/-) 4.0 years of treatment (range 0.06-22), 24 patients (40%) stopped the therapy, 14 (58.3%) of whom due to clinical improvement. The overall 5-, and 10-year survival rates of IV iloprost were 68.2% and 55.6%, respectively. CONCLUSION: SSc patients who received this flexible IV iloprost regimen achieved clinical improvement, reflected in the high persistence rate of the drug, with a good tolerability profile. In addition, most side effects were mild and easily managed.

Sudden winter iloprost withdrawal in scleroderma patients during COVID-19 pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: Intravenous iloprost is currently recommended in the treatment of Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) refractory to oral therapy and of digital ulcers (DUs) related to systemic sclerosis (SSc). In real-life practice there is a huge heterogeneity about the Iloprost regimens used. METHODS: A survey was carried out on SSc patients that interrupted Iloprost infusion to compare acral vascular symptoms just before Iloprost withdrawal and just after the missed infusion. Severity, and frequency of RP, new DUs onset or aggravation of those pre-existing were reported. Last available capillaroscopic images were also evaluated. RESULTS: The analysis includes 50 patients. After iloprost withdrawal, 11 patients reported a RP worsening because of enhanced intensity (p = 0.007). Only 8 patients of them also complained of an increased frequency (p = 0.07). None of the patients experienced digital ulcers for the first-time during quarantine. Among the 27 patients with a history of digital ulcers, 9 reported worsening and 7 recurrence of DUs. Overall, 17 patients (34.0 %) complained of a worsening of SSc vascular acral manifestations, namely RP or DUs. Reduced capillary density was associated with RP worsening, in particular, each unit increase of capillary density corresponds to an average 44 % decrease in the odds of RP worsening (OR 0.56, CI 95 % 0.36-0.97, p = 0.037). As for RP worsening, the aggravation of DU was associated with a lower capillary density. CONCLUSIONS: Low capillary density can predict a worsening of both RP and DUs in controlled quarantine conditions within a month after iloprost discontinuation in SSc patients.

Combinatory lung tumor inhibition by myo-inositol and iloprost/rapamycin: association with immunomodulation.

Although both preclinical and clinical studies have suggested that myo-inositol (MI) may be a safe and effective lung cancer chemopreventive agent, its efficacy is moderate. To test whether the chemopreventive agents iloprost (IL) or rapamycin enhance the lung tumor inhibitory effects of MI, A/J mice were treated with the tobacco smoke carcinogen 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK) and, beginning one week after the end of NNK treatment, given MI, IL, rapamycin, MI + IL or MI + rapamycin for 17 weeks. Analyses of the number and size of tumors on the surface of the lung have indicated that MI, IL, rapamycin, MI + IL and MI + rapamycin reduced the multiplicity of NNK-induced lung tumors by 41, 34, 46, 79 and 67%, respectively, and larger tumors (lung tumors with a diameter of 1-2 or >2 mm) were absent in the MI + IL and MI + rapamycin groups. These results clearly indicated that MI + IL and MI + rapamycin are more effective than MI alone in inhibiting the formation and growth of lung tumors. Assessment of the immunomodulatory effects of the drugs showed that whereas MI + rapamycin and MI + IL increased the infiltration of lung tumors by CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, MI + rapamycin reduced the expression of the immune checkpoint protein programmed-death ligand-1 (PD-L1). Moreover, all treatments, except IL, increased apoptosis, whereas cell proliferation was markedly suppressed in all treated groups. In summary, these results suggest that IL and rapamycin could enhance the efficacy of MI in lung cancer chemoprevention trials.

Inhaled iloprost as an add-on therapy for advanced pulmonary arterial hypertension: An Indian perspective.

Background Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a progressive disease with high morbidity and mortality. Risk stratification and initiation of dual or triple combination therapy has a better clinical response, especially in high-risk patients. Unfortunately, prostacyclin analogues are not marketed in India; hence, the use of these medications is limited. We report the benefits and difficulties of using iloprost inhalation in patients with advanced PAH in India. Methods In this prospective observational study, we included patients with group 1 PAH. Inhaled iloprost was initiated as an add-on therapy for patients who had clinical, echocardiographic or laboratory deterioration on dual oral medications. Patients with clinical instability were excluded. All patients underwent thorough clinical evaluation, detailed echocardiogram and laboratory investigations. Patients were started on inhaled iloprost 2.5 µg six times daily and closely followed up. The dose was escalated if necessary. On follow-up, clinical echocardiographic and laboratory evaluation was done on all patients. Results Fourteen patients (11 women) with a median age of 32 years (2-66 years) with group 1 PAH were started on inhaled iloprost as an add-on therapy. Improvement in clinical parameters, WHO functional class, echocardiographic-derived right ventricular function, and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-pro-BNP) levels were observed in 10 of 14 patients. A median increase of 31% (4.2, 106%) in the distance travelled during 6-minute walk test, a median increase of 45% (-20, 120%) in right ventricular fractional area change, a median increase of 27% (-16.7, 60%) in tricuspid annular peak systolic excursion and a median decrease of 36.7% (-69.6, 17.2%) in NT-pro-BNP levels were observed after initiation of medication. Three patients had progression of symptoms and were then referred for lung/heart-lung transplant. One patient developed progression of symptoms after an excellent initial response and transitioned to subcutaneous treprostinil. Improvement in clinical, echocardiographic and laboratory features allowed us to successfully perform surgical Potts shunt in 2 patients. The medications were well tolerated with minimal and transient side-effects. There were no deaths. Conclusion Inhaled iloprost can be used with acceptable benefits and minimal side-effects in patients with PAH.

Management of severe frostbite with iloprost, alteplase and heparin: a Yukon case series.

BACKGROUND: We identified the need to modernize frostbite management in our northern centre and implemented a treatment protocol in 2015. Our aim was to describe the clinical course of patients presenting to the hospital since the implementation of the protocol. METHODS: This was a retrospective case series from Whitehorse General Hospital, Whitehorse, Yukon Territory, Canada. We reviewed the charts of patients who presented to the hospital with grade 2-4 frostbite and were treated as per our protocol between Feb. 9, 2015, and Feb. 8, 2020. Patients with grade 2-4 frostbite received iloprost; in addition, those with grade 4 frostbite received alteplase and heparin. We determined the number of digits affected and salvaged, and the time from presentation to the emergency department to treatment initiation. We also examined patients' demographic characteristics, predisposing events, frostbite severity and adverse drug reactions. RESULTS: In 22 patients treated for grade 2-4 frostbite, 142 digits were affected: 59 with grade 2 frostbite, 25 with grade 3 frostbite and 58 with grade 4 frostbite; of the 142, 113 (79.6%) were salvaged. All 29 digits amputated had grade 4 frostbite. The mean time from presentation to iloprost initiation was reduced from 32.9 hours in 2015 to 3.0 hours in 2020. Sports (10 cases [45%]) and alcohol use (6 [27%]) were the most common precipitating events, with alcohol use tending to result in more severe injury (grade 4 in 5 of 6 cases). Adverse reactions with iloprost (e.g., headache) were common but mild. Adverse reactions with alteplase (e.g., bleeding) were less common but of greater clinical significance. INTERPRETATION: Over the study period, our protocol contributed to improvement in frostbite care at our institution, resulting in a digit salvage rate comparable to other published results. Our 5-year experience shows that advanced medical care of frostbite can be achieved, even at a rural centre.

Critical limb ischemia patients clinically improving with medical treatment have lower neutrophil-to-lymphocyte and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratios.

OBJECTIVES: Inflammation is a component in the pathogenesis of critical limb ischemia. We aimed to assess how inflammation affects response to treatment in patients treated for critical limb ischemia using neutrophil-to-lymphocyte (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocytes ratios (PLR) as markers of inflammation. METHODS: Patients in a single tertiary cardiovascular center with critical limb ischemia unsuitable for surgical or interventional revascularization were retrospectively identified. Data were collected on medical history for risk factors, previous surgical or endovascular revascularization, and outcome. A standard regimen of low molecular weight heparin, aspirin, statins, iloprost infusions, and a standard pain medication protocol were applied to each patient per hospital protocol. Patients with improvement in ischemic pain and healed ulcers made up the responders group and cases with no worsening pain or ulcer size or progression to minor or major amputations made up the non-responders group. Responders and Non-responders were compared for risk factors including pretreatment NLR and PLR. RESULTS: 268 included patients who were not candidates for surgical or endovascular revascularization were identified. Responders had significantly lower pretreatment NLR (4.48 vs 8.47, p < 0.001) and PLR (162.19 vs 225.43, p = 0.001) values. After controlling for associated risk factors NLR ≥ 4.63 (p < 0.001) and PLR ≥ 151.24 (p = 0.016) were independently associated with no response to treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocytes ratio are markers of inflammation that are reduced in patients improving with medical treatment suggesting a decreased state of inflammation before treatment in responding patients.

Decrease of peripheral resistance after intraoperative administration of iloprost in patients with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus and with peripheral arterial occlusive disease.

BACKGROUND: In many cases, Ilomedin® infusions are applied as part of a perioperative measure in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease because it makes a relevant vasodilatatory effect in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and with/without peripheral neuropathy. AIMS: A prospective case-control study was performed to investigate the effect of prostanoids on peripheral resistance in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and patients without type 2 diabetes mellitus, as well as the role of peripheral neuropathy in patients undergoing arterial reconstruction. METHODS: Sixty patients undergoing arterial reconstruction were enrolled. Sufficient data were collected on 38 patients. Prior to surgery, peripheral nerve conduction velocity was measured. Blood flow volume at the common femoral artery was assessed intraoperatively using a Doppler flowmeter at four time points: at baseline before arterial reconstruction (T0), after reconstruction (T1), after 5 (T2) and 10 min (T3) after intra-arterial application of 3000 ng of Ilomedin. Peripheral resistance units were calculated as a function of mean arterial pressure and flow volume using the following formula: peripheral resistance unit = mean arterial pressure (mm Hg) / flow volume (mL/min). RESULTS: Ilomedin produced an immediate and significant drop of peripheral resistance in patients without type 2 diabetes mellitus as well as in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Patients with peripheral neuropathy showed a less pronounced effect to Ilomedin compared to individuals with normal nerve conduction velocity.

Intra-Arterial Administration of Iloprost in Patients Undergoing Endovascular or Hybrid Revascularization Procedures for Peripheral Arterial Disease.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to find out if intra-arterial intraoperative iloprost administration, in selected patients undergoing endovascular revascularization procedures, could lead to better results compared with a control group of patients with similar clinical background and risk factors. METHODS: We prospectively collected data of consecutive patients undergoing endovascular or hybrid revascularization in the period from June 2017 to August 2019, which were then retrospectively analyzed. Those patients were divided into 2 groups: iloprost and control groups. Inclusion criteria were as follows: the presence of an arteriography that included the foot; Rutherford class 4-6; and Rutherford class 3 with at least 2 cardiovascular risk factors or previous revascularization procedures on the same limb. The intraoperative intra-arterial administration of iloprost was the inclusion criterion for the iloprost group. Patients with a compromised cardiological condition were excluded, as this was a contraindication for iloprost administration. Patients from the 2 groups were matched using the propensity score matching (PSM) methodology of Rosenbaum and Rubin. The primary outcome was freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR). The secondary outcomes were limb salvage and overall survival. RESULTS: During the mentioned period, we treated 190 consecutive limbs. The mean follow-up was 11.73 months (median, 10; interquartile range, 5-19). After PSM, the freedom from TLR was significantly better in the iloprost group (78 ± 7%, 74 ± 8%, and 63 ± 9% vs. 67 ± 8%, 50 ± 9%, and 38 ± 10% at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively; P = 0.043). No significant difference was found in terms of limb salvage (92 ± 5%, 88 ± 6%, and 88 ± 6% vs. 92 ± 4%, 85 ± 6%, and 81 ± 7% at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively; P = 0.52) and survival (95 ± 3%, 95 ± 3%, and 95 ± 3% vs. 95 ± 4%, 92 ± 5%, and 71 ± 9% at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively; P = 0.14) between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: These results seem to encourage considering intraoperative use of this adjunct, at least in endovascular revascularization procedures, to improve distal outflow.

Therapeutic iloprost for the treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (the ThIlo trial): a prospective, randomized, multicenter phase II study.

BACKGROUND: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is caused by rapid-onset (within hours) acute inflammatory processes in lung tissue, and it is a life-threatening condition with high mortality. The treatment of ARDS to date is focused on the prevention of further iatrogenic damage of the lung rather than the treatment of the initial inflammatory process. Several preclinical studies have revealed a beneficial effect of iloprost on the control of pulmonary inflammation, and in a small number of patients with ARDS, iloprost treatment resulted in improved oxygenation. Therefore, we plan to conduct a large multicenter trial to evaluate the effect of iloprost on ARDS. METHODS: The Therapeutic Iloprost during ARDS trial (ThIlo trial) is a multicenter, randomized, single blinded, clinical phase II trial assessing the efficacy of inhaled iloprost for the prevention of the development and progression of ARDS in critically ill patients. One hundred fifty critically ill patients suffering from acute ARDS will be treated either by nebulized iloprost or NaCl 0.9% for 5 days. Blood samples will be drawn at defined time points to elucidate the serum levels of iloprost and inflammatory markers during treatment. Mechanical ventilation will be standardized. In follow-up visits at days 28 and 90 as well as 6 months after enrollment, functional status according to the Barthel Index and a health care-related questionnaire, and frailty (Vulnerable Elders Survey) will be evaluated. The primary endpoint is the improvement of oxygenation, defined as the ratio of PaO2/FiO2. Secondary endpoints include 90-day all-cause mortality, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores during the study period up to day 90, the duration of mechanical ventilation, the length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, ventilator-associated pneumonia, delirium, ICU-acquired weakness, and discharge localization. The study will be conducted in three university ARDS centers in Germany. DISCUSSION: The results of the ThIlo trial will highlight the anti-inflammatory effect of iloprost on early inflammatory processes during ARDS, resulting in the improvement of outcome parameters in patients with ARDS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EUDRA-CT: 2016-003168-37. Registered on 12 April 2017. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03111212. Registered on 4 June 2017.

Efficacy and safety of iloprost in patients with septic shock-induced endotheliopathy-Protocol for the multicenter randomized, placebo-controlled, blinded, investigator-initiated trial.

BACKGROUND: In Europe 700.000 new cases of sepsis occur annually and more than 100.000 of these patients die due to multiorgan failure (MOF). We have identified shock-induced endotheliopathy (SHINE) to be associated with development of MOF and mortality. Furthermore, in patients with septic shock those with circulating levels of thrombomodulin (TM) above 10 ng/mL have twice the mortality (56% vs 28%) than those with levels below this level. Pilot studies indicate that infusion of iloprost (1 ng/kg/min) is associated with improved endothelial function in patients with septic shock. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a multicenter, randomized, blinded, investigator-initiated, adaptive phase 2B trial in up to 384 patients with septic shock-induced endotheliopathy defined by TM > 10 ng/mL who are allocated 1:1 to 72 hours continuous infusion of iloprost 1 ng/kg/min or placebo (equal volume of saline). The primary outcome is the mean daily modified Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score in the ICU up to day 90. Secondary outcomes include 28- and 90-day all-cause mortality, days alive without vasopressor in the ICU within 90 days, days alive without mechanical ventilation in the ICU within 90 days, days alive without renal replacement therapy in the ICU within 90 days, numbers of serious adverse reactions, and the number of serious adverse events within the first 7 days. DISCUSSION: This trial tests the safety and efficacy of iloprost vs placebo for 72 hours in patients with septic shock and SHINE. The outcome measures focus on the potential effect of the intervention to mitigate organ failure. TRIAL REGISTRATION: COMBAT-SHINE trial-EudraCT no. 2019-001131-31-Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04123444-Ethics Committee no. H-19018258.

Low dose Iloprost effect on platelet aggregation in comatose out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients: A predefined sub-study of the ENDO-RCA randomized -phase 2- trial.

PURPOSE: This is a predefined sub-study of the Endothelial Dysfunction in Resuscitated Cardiac Arrest (ENDO-RCA) trial. We aim to investigate Iloprost, a prostacyclin analogue, safety by evaluating change in whole blood platelet aggregometry (Multiplate) in out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients from baseline to 96-h post randomization. METHODS: A randomized, placebo controlled double-blinded trial in 46 OHCA patients. Patients were allocated 1:2 to 48 h Iloprost infusion, (1 ng/kg/min) or placebo (saline infusion). Platelet aggregation was determined by platelet aggregation tests ASPI-test (arachidonic acid); TRAP-test (thrombin-receptor activating peptide (TRAP)-6; RISTO test (Ristocetin); ADP test (adenosin diphosphat). RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the iloprost and placebo groups according to ASPI, TRAP, RISTO and ADP platelet aggregation assays. Further, no significant differences regarding risk of bleeding were found between groups (Risk of bleeding: ASPI <40 U; TRAP <92 U; RISTO <35 U; ADP <50 U). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the iloprost infusion did not influence platelet aggregation as evaluated by the ASPI, TRAP, RISTO and ADP assays. There was no increased risk of bleeding or transfusion therapy. A decline in platelet aggregation was observed for the ASPI and ADP assays during the initial 96 h after OHCA. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration at clinicaltrials.gov (identifier NCT02685618) on 18-02-2016.

"Endothelial Dysfunction in Resuscitated Cardiac Arrest (ENDO-RCA): Safety and efficacy of low-dose Iloprost, a prostacyclin analogue, in addition to standard therapy, as compared to standard therapy alone, in post-cardiac-arrest-syndrome patients."

OBJECTIVE: An increasingly recognized prognostic factor for out-of-hospital-cardiac-arrest (OHCA) patients is the ischemia-reperfusion injury after restored blood circulation. Endothelial injury is common in patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest and is associated with poor outcome. This study was designed to investigate if iloprost infusion, a prostacyclin analogue, reduces endothelial damage in OHCA patients. METHODS: 50 patients were randomized in a placebo controlled double-blinded trial and allocated 1:2 to 48-hours iloprost infusion, (1 ng/kg/min) or placebo (saline infusion). Endothelial biomarkers (soluble thrombomodulin (sTM), sE-selectin, syndecan-1, soluble vascular endothelial growth factor (sVEGF), vascular endothelial cadherine (VEcad), nucleosomes) and sympathoadrenal activation (epinephrine/norepinephrine) from baseline to 48 and 96-hours were evaluated. RESULTS: Iloprost infusion did not influence endothelial biomarkers by the 48-hour endpoint. A rebound effect was observed with higher biomarker plasma values in the iloprost group (sTM p=0.02; Syndecan p=0.004; nucleosomes p<0.001; VEcad p<0.03) after 96-hours. There was a significant difference in 180-day mortality in favor of placebo. There was no difference regarding total adverse events between groups (p=0.73). Two patients were withdrawn in the iloprost group due to hypotension. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of low-dose iloprost (1ng/kg/min) to OHCA patients did not significantly influence endothelial biomarkers as measured by the 48- hour endpoint. A rebound effect was however observed in the 96-hour statistical model, with increasing endothelial biomarker levels after cessation of the iloprost-infusion.

lloprost delivered via the BREELIBTM nebulizer: a review of the clinical evidence for efficacy and safety.

Inhaled iloprost is a well-established medication to treat pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), a serious and potentially fatal disease of the pulmonary resistance vessels. The therapeutic administration of iloprost requires six to nine inhalations per day, due to the short biological half-life of this prostacyclin analogue. The I-NebTM AADTM, introduced in 2006, is the most commonly used nebulizer for delivering iloprost, requiring at least 6.5 min for an inhaled dose of 5 µg. In order to reduce inhalation time, a portable nebulizer based on modern-device technology was developed. The acute safety and tolerability of rapid iloprost inhalation via the BREELIBTM nebulizer was assessed in a four-part clinical trial. In this review, I describe the rationale and features of the new nebulizer, with particular emphasis on the safety and tolerability profile of iloprost inhalation via BREELIBTM observed in the first clinical studies. Meanwhile, the BREELIBTM nebulizer is approved and available for inhaled iloprost therapy combining significantly reduced inhalation time with good tolerability. This new approach will certainly improve patient convenience and compliance, possibly resulting in broader acceptance and improved efficacy of iloprost aerosol therapy in PAH.