Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 39
Filtrar
1.
BMC Emerg Med ; 22(1): 170, 2022 10 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36280806

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Acute appendicitis is the most common cause of acute abdomen. During the pandemic, to contain the spread of COVID-19, there were some integral changes in the medical processes based on the pandemic prevention policy, especially regarding emergency surgery. This study was conducted to investigate whether this pandemic also impacted the decision-making for both patients and medical personnel along with the treatment outcomes. METHODS: Patients of age 18 years or older who were diagnosed clinically and radiologically with acute appendicitis between Jan 1, 2017, and Dec 31, 202,0 were reviewed. The data of 1991 cases were collected and used for this study. Two groups were formed, one group before and the other group after the outbreak. The gathered data included gender, age, appendiceal fecalith, outcomes of treatment, and long-term outcomes of non-operation (8 months follow-up). We also collected details of surgical cases from the above two groups. This data also included age, gender, appendiceal fecalith, fever, jaundice, length of onset before presenting to an emergency department (ED), anesthesia, surgery, white cell count, pathology, complications, and length of stay. We compared the above data respectively and analyzed the differences. RESULTS: Compared to the period before the outbreak, patient visits for acute appendicitis remarkably dropped (19.8%), but surgical cases showed no change (dropped by roughly 5%). There were significant differences (P < 0.05) in failure of non-operation(after the pandemic 8.31% vs. before pandemic 3.22%), interval appendectomy(after pandemic 6.29% vs. before pandemic 12.84%), recurrence(after pandemic 23.27% vs. before pandemic 14.46%), and outcomes of recurrence. There was a significant difference (P < 0.05) in anesthesia method, surgery way, and complications( before pandemic 4.15% vs. after pandemic9.89% P < 0.05) in patients who underwent the surgery. There was no statistical difference (P > 0.05) concerning age, gender, fever, jaundice, appendiceal fecalith, white cell count, and length of onset before presenting to the ED. CONCLUSION: The current pandemic prevention policy is very effective, but some decision-making processes of doctor-patient have changed in the context of COVID-19 pandemic, that further influenced some treatment outcomes and might lead to a potential economic burden. It is essential to address the undue concern of everyone and optimize the treatment process.


Asunto(s)
Apendicitis , COVID-19 , Impactación Fecal , Humanos , Lactante , Adolescente , Apendicitis/epidemiología , Apendicitis/cirugía , Apendicitis/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiología , Pandemias , Impactación Fecal/epidemiología , Apendicectomía/métodos , Enfermedad Aguda , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tiempo de Internación
2.
J Vet Diagn Invest ; 31(3): 368-370, 2019 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30973086

RESUMEN

In contrast to conventional commercial poultry, which are raised primarily in controlled indoor environments, backyard poultry are typically raised in less restricted settings, potentially exposing them to a greater variety of ingestible substances, including multiple types of forage. Consequently, problems such as gastrointestinal impactions caused by ingesta have been noted in backyard poultry. To determine the prevalence of these impactions in backyard poultry, we performed a retrospective database search for autopsy submissions to the California Animal Health and Food Safety laboratory system and found that gastrointestinal impaction was associated with the death of 42 backyard poultry cases (40 chickens, 1 turkey, and 1 goose) from January 2013 to July 2018. In 32 of these 42 (76%) cases, the impaction was caused by fibrous plant material, 7 (17%) by compacted feed, and 3 (7%) by miscellaneous ingesta (tortilla, plastic, and wood shavings). The large proportion of grass impactions indicate that foraging is the predominant source of impaction material in backyard poultry, and that long grasses may be a significant health hazard for poultry. Backyard, pasture-raised, and free-range poultry producers are advised to maintain short pastures, avoid feeds that may expand in the gastrointestinal tract, and provide adequate grit to prevent impactions.


Asunto(s)
Pollos , Impactación Fecal/veterinaria , Gansos , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/epidemiología , Pavos , Animales , California/epidemiología , Impactación Fecal/clasificación , Impactación Fecal/epidemiología , Impactación Fecal/etiología , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/clasificación , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/etiología , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
3.
J Surg Res ; 238: 113-118, 2019 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30769247

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Numerous factors contribute to advanced disease or increased complications in patients with acute appendicitis (AA). This study aimed to identify risk factors associated with AA perforation, including the effect of system time (ST) delay, after controlling for patient time (PT) delay. In this study, PT was controlled (to less than or equal to 24 h) to better understand the effect of ST delay on AA perforation. METHODS: Medical records of patients who underwent surgery for AA at a tertiary referral hospital from October 2009 through September 2013 were reviewed. Data collected included demographics, body mass index, presence of fecalith, PT (i.e., duration of time from symptom onset to arrival in emergency department), and ST (i.e., duration of time from arrival in emergency department to operating room). AA was classified as simple (acute, nonperforated) versus advanced (gangrenous, perforated). RESULTS: Seven hundred forty-seven patients underwent surgery for AA. After excluding patients with PT > 24 h, 445 patients fit the study criteria, of which 358 patients with simple AA and 87 patients with advanced disease. Advanced appendicitis patients were older and had higher body mass index, longer PT, higher WBC, and higher incidence of fecaliths. Both groups had similar ST. Risk factors for advanced appendicitis after multiple regression analysis are age >50 y old, WBC >15,000, the presence of fecaliths, and PT delay >12 h. CONCLUSIONS: Once PT delay was limited to ≤24 h, the ST delay of >12 h did not adversely affect the incidence of advanced AA. Age >50 y, WBC >15,000, PT delay >12 h, and the presence of fecaliths were identified as risk factors associated with advanced AA.


Asunto(s)
Apendicectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Apendicitis/cirugía , Impactación Fecal/epidemiología , Perforación Intestinal/epidemiología , Tiempo de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Apendicitis/complicaciones , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Impactación Fecal/etiología , Impactación Fecal/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Perforación Intestinal/etiología , Perforación Intestinal/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto Joven
4.
Eur J Pediatr ; 178(2): 235-242, 2019 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30421265

RESUMEN

Non-operative treatment of uncomplicated appendicitis in children is gaining ground. Pending definitive evidence regarding its effectiveness, there is a call to evaluate clinical recovery after non-operative treatment. In this study, we analyzed data collected during initial admission of a multicenter prospective cohort in which children, 7-17 year, were treated non-operatively for uncomplicated appendicitis. During admission clinical parameters (pain and gastro-intestinal symptoms), inflammation parameters and sequential abdominal ultrasound were recorded. In total, 45 children were included, 42(93%) were discharged without the need for appendectomy; median [IQR] pain scores on admission were 5 [4-7], decreasing to 2 [0-3] after 1 day of treatment. Initially, 28/42 (67%) reported nausea and 19/42 (45%) vomiting; after 1 day, this was 3/42 (7%) and 1/42 (2%), respectively. White blood cell count declined from a median [IQR] of 12.9 [10.7-16.7] 10E9/L on admission to 7.0 [5.8-9.9] 10E9/L on day 1. Median [IQR] C-reactive protein levels increased from 27.5 [9-69] mg/L on admission to 48 [22-80] mg/L on day 1, declining to 21.5 [11-42] mg/L on day 2. Follow-up ultrasound showed no signs of complicated appendicitis in any of the patients.Conclusion: Clinical symptoms resolved in most children after 1 day of non-operative treatment. This suggests that non-operative treatment is a viable alternative to appendectomy regarding clinical recovery.Trail registration: NCT01356641 What is Known: • Non-operative treatment of uncomplicated appendicitis in children is safe and its use around the world is gaining ground, however high quality evidence from adequately designed randomized trials is still lacking. • Concerns have been raised regarding the potentially prolonged clinical recovery associated with non-operative treatment. What is New: • Most clinical symptoms resolve after 1 day of non-operative treatment in the majority of children.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Apendicectomía/métodos , Apendicitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Tratamiento Conservador/métodos , Dolor Abdominal/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Abdominal/etiología , Adolescente , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Apendicectomía/efectos adversos , Niño , Estudios de Cohortes , Tratamiento Conservador/efectos adversos , Impactación Fecal/epidemiología , Impactación Fecal/etiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Países Bajos , Dimensión del Dolor , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ultrasonografía
5.
JAMA Surg ; 153(11): 1021-1027, 2018 11 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30046808

RESUMEN

Importance: The influence of disease severity on outcomes and use of health care resources in children with complicated appendicitis is poorly characterized. Adjustment for variation in disease severity may have implications for ensuring fair reimbursement and comparative performance reporting among hospitals. Objective: To examine the association of intraoperative findings as a measure of disease severity with complication rates and resource use in children with complicated appendicitis. Design: This retrospective cohort study used clinical data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program pediatric appendectomy pilot database (NSQIP-P database) and cost data from the Pediatric Health Information System database. Twenty-two children's hospitals participated in the NSQIP Pediatric Appendectomy Collaborative Pilot Project. Patients aged 3 to 18 years with complicated appendicitis who underwent an appendectomy from January 1, 2013, through December 31, 2014, were included in the study. Appendicitis was categorized in the NSQIP-P database as complicated if any of the following 4 intraoperative findings occurred in the operative report: visible hole, fibropurulent exudate in more than 2 quadrants, abscess, or extraluminal fecalith. Data were analyzed from January 1, 2013, through December 31, 2014. Main Outcomes and Measures: Thirty-day postoperative adverse event rate, revisit rate, hospital cost, and length of stay. Multivariable regression was used to estimate event rates and outcomes for all observed combinations of intraoperative findings, with adjusting for patient characteristics and clustering within hospitals. Results: A total of 1333 patients (58.7% boys; median age, 10 years; interquartile range, 7-12 years) were included; multiple intraoperative findings of complicated appendicitis were reported in 589 (44.2%). Compared with single findings, the presence of multiple findings was associated with higher rates of surgical site infection (odds ratio, 1.40; 95% CI, 0.95-2.06; P = .09), higher revisit rates (odds ratio, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.15-2.21; P = .005), longer length of stay (rate ratio, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.36-1.55; P < .001), and higher hospital cost (rate ratio, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.19-1.53; P < .001). Significant differences were found among different combinations of intraoperative findings for all outcomes, including a 3.6-fold difference in rates of surgical site infection (range, 7.5% for fecalith alone to 27.2% for all 4 findings; P = .002), a 2.6-fold difference in revisit rates (range, 8.9% for exudate alone to 22.9% for all 4 findings; P = .001), a 2.2-fold difference in length of stay (range, 4.0 days for exudate alone to 8.9 days for all 4 findings; P < .001), and a 2.4-fold difference in mean cumulative cost (range, $13 296 for exudate alone to $32 282 for all 4 findings; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: More severe presentations of complicated appendicitis are associated with worse outcomes and greater resource use. Severity adjustment may be needed to ensure fair reimbursement and comparative performance reporting, particularly at hospitals treating underserved populations where more severe presentations are common.


Asunto(s)
Apendicitis/cirugía , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Absceso Abdominal/epidemiología , Absceso Abdominal/cirugía , Adolescente , Apendicectomía , Apendicitis/epidemiología , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Bases de Datos Factuales , Exudados y Transudados , Impactación Fecal/epidemiología , Impactación Fecal/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
6.
Cir. Esp. (Ed. impr.) ; 96(3): 131-137, mar. 2018. tab
Artículo en Español | IBECS | ID: ibc-171860

RESUMEN

La incontinencia fecal representa una de las principales causas de institucionalización en las últimas décadas de la vida de una persona, asociando además gran repercusión psicosocial y económica. La literatura muestra escasa evidencia cuando se trata de analizar de forma específica a este grupo de población, debido a la falta de uniformidad en la consideración de «paciente anciano» y en la dificultad de su detección y diagnóstico. El objetivo de este artículo ha sido realizar una revisión narrativa de los principales aspectos relacionados con la incontinencia fecal en el anciano y facilitar el manejo de estos pacientes. La asistencia para la defecación, las modificaciones dietéticas y el control de la consistencia de las deposiciones o el tratamiento farmacológico son en muchos casos medidas suficientes. No obstante, otras terapias como el biofeedback, la neuromodulación o el tratamiento quirúrgico no deben descartarse y han de ser valoradas de forma selectiva en pacientes ancianos


Fecal incontinence is one of the leading causes for the institutionalization of people in the last decades of life, associated with a great psychosocial and economic burden. The literature is scarce in this population group, due to the absence of universally accepted criteria to define "elderly patients" and difficulties in detection and diagnostic. The aim of this article was to conduct a narrative review of the main aspects related to fecal incontinence in older patients, providing management support. Toileting assistance, dietary change, controlling stool consistency and medical treatment can be used to treat these patients. Nevertheless, other therapies, such as biofeedback, neuromodulation or surgical treatment, can be considered in selected patients


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Anciano , Incontinencia Fecal/epidemiología , Impactación Fecal/epidemiología , Incontinencia Fecal/terapia , Evaluación Geriátrica/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Riesgo , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Susceptibilidad a Enfermedades
7.
Age Ageing ; 46(1): 119-124, 2017 01 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28181648

RESUMEN

Background: Faecal impaction (FI) is a common problem in old people living in nursing home. Its prevalence and associated factors remain unknown in the general population. Aim: To evaluate FI prevalence in the Spanish population older than 65 years and to assess the factors associated with it. Methods: A telephone survey was carried out of a Spanish population older than 65 years random sample (N = 1000). FI was assessed using a previously validated questionnaire. Results: A total of 28,128 calls were made; 1,431 subjects were eligible and 1,000 subjects were enrollled, mean aged 74.6 ± 7.3 (65­97); 57.5% were women. At least 53 people reported FI within the past year (5.3% (CI 95%: 3.9­6.7%)). Only 0.03% met criteria for chronic constipation and faecal incontinence. FI-associated factors were constipation, female gender, reduced physical activity, and chronic renal failure (CRF). Conclusion: FI is a prevalent problem in old Spanish population. Constipation and female gender are the main associated factors; low physical activity and CRF appear to play also a significant role. Further studies are required to confirm this association.


Asunto(s)
Impactación Fecal/epidemiología , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Envejecimiento , Comorbilidad , Estreñimiento/epidemiología , Impactación Fecal/diagnóstico , Impactación Fecal/fisiopatología , Incontinencia Fecal/epidemiología , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/epidemiología , Masculino , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Conducta Sedentaria , Factores Sexuales , España/epidemiología
8.
J Clin Gastroenterol ; 50(7): 572-7, 2016 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26669560

RESUMEN

GOALS: The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence and associated charges of fecal impaction for trends in hospital and patient demographics in emergency departments (ED) across the United States. BACKGROUND: In 2010, an ICD-9-CM code (560.32) for fecal impaction was introduced, allowing for assessment of fecal impaction incidence. STUDY: Data were obtained from the National Emergency Department Sample records in which fecal impaction (ICD-9-CM code 560.32) was first listed as a diagnosis in 2011. RESULTS: In 2011, there were 42,481 [95% confidence interval (CI), 39,908-45,054] fecal impaction ED visits, with an overall rate of 32 fecal impaction visits per 100,000 ED visits. Adjusted for inflation in 2014 dollars, the associated mean charge of a fecal impaction ED visit was $3060.47 (95% CI, $2943.02-$3177.92), with an aggregate national charge in the US of $130,010,772 (95% CI, $120,688,659-$139,332,885). All charges were adjusted for inflation and reported in 2014 dollars. Late elders (85+ y) had the highest rate of fecal impaction ED visits, followed by early elders (65 to 84 y). Medicare was the primary payer for the greatest number of fecal impaction ED visits accounting for nearly two thirds of visit payments. CONCLUSION: This study reports previously unexplored statistics on the number, frequency, and associated charges of ED visits with a primary diagnosis of fecal impaction, a condition found most commonly among elders.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Impactación Fecal/epidemiología , Precios de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicare/economía , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Preescolar , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Impactación Fecal/economía , Impactación Fecal/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Masculino , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
9.
Cir. Esp. (Ed. impr.) ; 93(8): 530-535, oct. 2015. ilus, tab
Artículo en Español | IBECS | ID: ibc-143311

RESUMEN

INTRODUCCIÓN: La ecografía endoanal dinámica (EEAD) en 3 dimensiones ha surgido en los últimos años como una alternativa a las pruebas existentes en el diagnóstico de las alteraciones del suelo pélvico. El objetivo de este trabajo es determinar la utilidad de la ecodefecografía en el diagnóstico y evaluación de los pacientes que presentan síntomas de obstrucción defecatoria, así como mostrar los resultados obtenidos tras su implementación en una unidad de suelo pélvico. MÉTODOS: Estudio retrospectivo que analiza a 66 pacientes (61 mujeres), con una edad media de 55 años (19-83). Se realizó una EEAD y se correlacionó con los síntomas y los hallazgos exploratorios en consulta. Se realizó tanto un estudio descriptivo como inferencial, así como un índice Kappa para buscar correlación entre la exploración física y la EEAD. RESULTADOS: Los motivos de consulta fueron: síndrome de obstrucción defecatoria (SOD) 36 pacientes (54,5%), prolapso de órganos pélvicos (POP) 27 pacientes (40,9%) y SOD junto con POP 3 pacientes (4,5%). La correlación de ambos grupos indica que la EEAD diagnostica más pacientes con rectocele grado III, enteroceles y anismos que la combinación de exploración-manometría-proctoscopia-ecografía bidimensional (Kappa 0,26; 0,38 y 0,21; IC 95%: 0,07-1,00; 0,15-1,00 y 0,12-1,00, respectivamente) (p < 0,001). Por el contrario, la EEAD diagnostica menos descensos del periné (Kappa 0,28; IC 95% 0,12-1,00). CONCLUSIÓN: La ecografía dinámica puede tener un papel relevante como prueba complementaria en el paciente con enfermedad del suelo pélvico, ya que permite diagnosticar procesos que mediante la inspección, la exploración física y la manometría pasarían desapercibidos


INTRODUCTION: Dynamic endoanal ultrasound has emerged in recent years as a test that could replace the now existing tests in the diagnosis of pelvic floor disorders. The aim of this paper is to determine the usefulness of echodefecography in the diagnosis and evaluation of patients with symptoms of anorrectal obstruction, and show the results obtained after its implementation in a pelvic floor unit, as a complementary tool that could replace conventional defecography. METHODS: In this retrospective study we analyzed 66 patients with a mean age of 55 years (19-83), 61 women (92%). All dynamic ultrasound was performed in 3 dimensions and was correlated with symptoms and physical findings in the consultation. A descriptive and inferential study was performed to find a kappa correlation between physical examination and echodefecography. RESULTS: The reasons for consultation were: Anorrectal obstruction syndrome 36 patients (54.5%), pelvic organ prolapse 27 patients (40.9%), and anorrectal obstruction syndrome along with pelvic organ prolapse 3 patients (4.5%). The correlation of the 2 groups indicated that echodefecography diagnosed more patients with grade III rectocele, enteroceles, and anismus than the combination of scan-ultrasound-manometry-proctoscopy (Kappa 0.26, 0.38 and 0.21, 95% CI: from 0,07 to 1.00, 0.15 to 1.00 and from 0.12 to 1.00, respectively) (P<.001). Conversely, echodefecography diagnosed less perineal descense (Kappa 0.28, 95% CI: 0.12 to 1.00). CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic anal ultrasonography may have a role as a complementary test in patients with pelvic floor disorders, achieving diagnoses that would go undetected by inspection, physical examination and manometry


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Neoplasias Pélvicas , Enfermedad Inflamatoria Pélvica , Diafragma Pélvico , Ultrasonido Enfocado Transrectal de Alta Intensidad/métodos , Rectocele , Hernia , Prolapso Rectal , Defecografía/métodos , Impactación Fecal/epidemiología , Diagnóstico Diferencial
10.
Can J Surg ; 58(1): 10-4, 2015 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25427333

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We sought to determine the association between the presence of a fecalith and acute/nonperforated appendicitis, gangrenous/perforated appendicitis and the healthy appendix. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed appendectomies performed between October 2003 and February 2012. We collected data on age, sex, appendix histology and the presence of a fecalith. RESULTS: During the study period, 1357 appendectomies were performed. Fecaliths were present in 186 patients (13.7%). There were 94 male (50.5%) and 92 female patients, and the mean age was 32 (range of 10-76) years. The fecalith rate was 13%- 16% and was nonexistant after age 80 years. The main groups with fecaliths were those with acute/nonperforated appendicitis (n = 121, 65.1%, p = 0.041) and those with a healthy appendix (n = 65, 34.9%, p = 0.003). The presence of fecaliths in the gangrenous/perforated appendicitis group was not significant (n = 19, 10.2%, p = 0.93). There were no fecaliths in patients with serositis, carcinoid or carcinoma. CONCLUSION: Our data confirm the theory of a statistical association between the presence of a fecalith and acute (nonperforated) appendicitis in adults. There was also a significant association between the healthy appendix and asymptomatic fecaliths. There was no correlation between a gangrenous/perforated appendix and the presence of a fecalith. The fecalith is an incidental finding and not always the primary cause of acute (nonperforated) appendictis or gangrenous (perforated) appendicitis. Further research on the topic is recommended.


CONTEXTE: Nous avons voulu examiner le lien entre la présence d'un fécalome et l'appendicite aiguë/non perforée, l'appendicite gangreneuse/perforée et un appendice sain. MÉTHODES: Nous avons analysé de manière rétrospective les appendicectomies effectuées entre octobre 2003 et février 2012. Nous avons recueilli des données sur l'âge, le sexe, l'histologie de l'appendice et la présence d'un fécalome. RÉSULTANTS: Durant la période de l'étude, 1357 appendicectomies ont été effectuées. Des fécalomes étaient présents chez 186 patients (13,7 %). L'étude regroupait 94 hommes (50,5 %) et 92 femmes; l'âge moyen était de 32 ans (entre 10 et 76 ans). Le taux de fécalome était de 13 % à 16 % et non existant après l'âge de 80 ans. Les principaux groupes porteurs de fécalomes étaient ceux qui présentaient une appendicite aiguë/non perforée (n = 121, 65,1 %, p = 0,041) et ceux dont l'appendice était sain (n = 65, 34,9 %, p = 0,003). La présence de fécalomes dans le groupe souffrant d'appendicite gangreneuse/perforée s'est révélée non significative (n = 19, 10,2 %, p = 0,93). Les patients qui souffraient de sérosite, de carcinoïde ou de carcinome ne présentaient pas de fécalomes. CONCLUSION: Nos données confirment la théorie d'un lien statistique entre la présence d'un fécalome et une appendicite aiguë (non perforée) chez l'adulte. On a également observé un lien significatif entre un appendice sain et des fécalomes asymptomatiques. On n'a observé aucune corrélation entre un appendice gangreneux/perforé et la présence de fécalomes. Le fécalome est une observation accessoire qui n'est pas toujours la principale cause de l'appendicite aiguë (non perforée) ou de l'appendicite gangreneuse (perforée). Une recherche plus approfondie à ce sujet est recommandée.


Asunto(s)
Apendicitis/epidemiología , Impactación Fecal/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Apendicectomía , Apendicitis/cirugía , Apéndice/patología , Niño , Edema/patología , Femenino , Gangrena , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Membrana Serosa/patología , Trinidad y Tobago/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
11.
Curr Gastroenterol Rep ; 16(9): 404, 2014 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25119877

RESUMEN

Fecal impaction (FI) is a common and potentially serious medical condition that occurs in all age groups. Children, incapacitated patients, and the institutionalized elderly are considered the highest at-risk populations. FI usually occurs in the setting of chronic or severe constipation, anatomic anorectal abnormalities, and neurogenic or functional gastrointestinal disorders. Generally, FI is a preventable disorder, and early recognition is important, as it is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and high health care costs. Evaluation with a careful history and physical examination, in conjunction with radiologic imaging, such as an acute abdominal series or computed tomography (CT), is imperative. Prompt identification and treatment minimize the risk of complications attributable to FI, which may include bowel obstruction leading to stercoral ulcer, perforation, peritonitis, or cardiopulmonary collapse with hemodynamic instability. Treatment options include manual fragmentation and extraction of the fecal mass, distal colonic cleansing using enemas and rectal lavage with the aid of a sigmoidoscope, and/or using water-soluble contrast media such as Gastrografin to both identify the extent of the impaction and aid in cleansing and removal. Surgical resection of the involved colon or rectum is reserved for peritonitis resulting from bowel perforation. Since recurrence is common, implementing preventive measures such as increasing daily water and fiber intake, limiting medications that decrease colonic motility, using secretagogues or prokinetic agents, and treating underlying anatomic defects are highly important.


Asunto(s)
Impactación Fecal/epidemiología , Impactación Fecal/diagnóstico , Impactación Fecal/terapia , Humanos , Factores de Riesgo
12.
PLoS One ; 9(8): e105281, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25148393

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There are no existing studies that provide data regarding the epidemiology of, and risk factors for, fecal impaction, either in the general population or in any sub-group of people. OBJECTIVE: Estimate the prevalence of and factors associated with fecal impaction on a representative sample of the institutionalized elderly population. DESIGN: Two-phase study. Phase 1: pilot study validating the methodology in which all residents of a single nursing home participated. Phase 2: national multi-center cross-sectional study. SETTING: 34 randomly selected nursing homes. MEASUREMENTS: The presence of fecal impaction and associated factors were evaluated using three different tools: data collected from medical records; a self-completion questionnaire filled out by the subjects or a proxy; and a rectal examination. SUBJECTS: Older subjects living in nursing homes. RESULTS: The prevalence of chronic constipation was 70.7% (95%CI: 67.3-74.1%), of which 95.9% of patients were properly diagnosed and 43.1% were properly controlled. The prevalence of FI according to patient history was 47.3% (43.6-51.0%) and 6.6% (4.7-8.5%) according to rectal examination. Controlled constipation (OR: 9.8 [5.2-18.4]) and uncontrolled constipation (OR: 37.21 [19.7-70.1]), the number of medications (OR: 1.2 [1.1-1.3]), reduced functional capacity (OR: 0.98 [0.97-0.99]) and the occasional use of NSAIDs were independent risk factors for fecal impaction. CONCLUSIONS: Constipation affects more than 70% of people living in nursing homes. Although it is properly diagnosed in more than 95% of cases, the disease is only controlled in less than 50%. Constipation, especially when not controlled, is the most significant risk factor leading to fecal impaction, which is prevalent in almost 50% of this population.


Asunto(s)
Impactación Fecal/epidemiología , Casas de Salud , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Comorbilidad , Estreñimiento/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Impactación Fecal/diagnóstico , Impactación Fecal/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Humanos , Laxativos/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Proyectos Piloto , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , España/epidemiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
13.
BMC Geriatr ; 13: 24, 2013 Mar 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23496919

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Studies on the epidemiology of fecal impaction are limited by the absence of a valid and reliable instrument to identify the condition in the elderly. Our aim is to validate a questionnaire for identifying fecal impaction in the elderly and to assess the impact of cognitive impairment and the aid of a proxy on its reliability. METHODS: We developed a 5 questions' questionnaire. The questionnaire was presented to twenty doctors to test its face validity. Feasibility was pre-tested with ten non institutionalized subjects who completed the questionnaire twice, once alone or with the help of a proxy, and another along with the researcher.For the validation of the questionnaire all residents in a single nursing-home were invited to participate, allowing the self-decision of using a proxy. Medical records of all subjects were abstracted without knowledge of subjects' answers and agreement between fecal impaction according to self-reported and medical records analyzed. Physical impairment was measured with the Barthel's test and cognitive impairment with the mini-mental test. RESULTS: In the face validity only minor changes in wording were suggested. In the feasibility pre-test all subjects were able to understand and complete the questionnaire and all questions were considered appropriate and easily understandable.One-hundred and ninety-nine of the 244 residents participated in the study (mean age 86,1 ± 6,6). One hundred and forty two subjects understood all questions; not understanding them was inversely associated with cognitive impairment score (aOR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.82-0.91). One hundred and sixty decided to use a proxy; the use of a proxy was inversely associated with educative level (0.13 (0.02-0.72), minimental's score (0.85; 0.76-0.95) and Barthel's score (0.96; 0.94-0.99). Agreement between medical records and self-completed questionnaire was 85.9% (kappa 0.72 (0,62- 0,82). Disagreement was unrelated to education and cognitive impairment. CONCLUSIONS: Our simple questionnaire is reliable for identifying fecal impaction in the elderly by self-report. Limitation imposed by cognitive impairment is minimized with the aid of a proxy.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos del Conocimiento/diagnóstico , Impactación Fecal/diagnóstico , Apoderado , Autoinforme/normas , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/normas , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Trastornos del Conocimiento/epidemiología , Trastornos del Conocimiento/psicología , Impactación Fecal/epidemiología , Impactación Fecal/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Casas de Salud/normas , Apoderado/psicología
14.
PLoS One ; 7(10): e42910, 2012.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23071488

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Chronic constipation (CC) is a common condition but its concurrent conditions are not well characterized. We measured the prevalence and risk of developing 15 pre-specified concurrent conditions in patients with CC. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study using the Medicaid database of California, utilizing ICD-9 codes for detection of cases (CC), controls (patients with GERD) and concurrent conditions. Study period was 01/01/1995 to 06/30/2005. Index date was the date 3 months before the first physician visit for CC. Pre-index time (12 months) was compared to post-index time (12 months) to assess the association of every concurrent condition within each cohort. To account for ascertainment bias, an adjusted odds ratio was calculated by comparing the odds ratio for every concurrent condition in the CC cohort to that in the GERD cohort. RESULTS: 147,595 patients with CC (mean age 54.2 years; 69.7% women; 36.2% white) and 142,086 patients with GERD (mean age 56.3 years; 65.3% women; 41.6% white) were evaluated. The most prevalent concurrent conditions with CC were hemorrhoids (7.6%), diverticular disease (5.9%), ano-rectal hemorrhage (4.7%), irritable bowel syndrome (3.5%) and fecal impaction (2%). When adjusted for ascertainment bias, the most notable associations with CC were Hirschsprung's disease, fecal impaction and ano-rectal conditions such as fissure, fistula, hemorrhage and ulcers. CONCLUSION: Chronic constipation is associated with several concurrent conditions of variable risk and prevalence. To reduce the overall burden of CC, these concurrent conditions need to be addressed.


Asunto(s)
Estreñimiento/complicaciones , California/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Estreñimiento/epidemiología , Impactación Fecal/complicaciones , Impactación Fecal/epidemiología , Femenino , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/complicaciones , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/epidemiología , Hemorroides/complicaciones , Hemorroides/epidemiología , Enfermedad de Hirschsprung/complicaciones , Enfermedad de Hirschsprung/epidemiología , Humanos , Síndrome del Colon Irritable/complicaciones , Síndrome del Colon Irritable/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Recto , Estudios Retrospectivos
15.
BMC Gastroenterol ; 11: 17, 2011 Mar 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21385443

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Antipsychotic are the cornerstone in the treatment of schizophrenia. They also have a number of side-effects. Constipation is thought to be common, and a potential serious side-effect, which has received little attention in recent literature. METHOD: We performed a retrospective study in consecutively admitted patients, between 2007 and 2009 and treated with antipsychotic medication, linking different electronic patient data to evaluate the prevalence and severity of constipation in patients with schizophrenia under routine treatment conditions. RESULTS: Over a period of 22 months 36.3% of patients (99) received at least once a pharmacological treatment for constipation. On average medication for constipation was prescribed for 273 days. Severe cases (N = 50), non-responsive to initial treatment, got a plain x-ray of the abdomen. In 68.4% fecal impaction was found. CONCLUSION: A high prevalence of constipation, often severe and needing medical interventions, was confirmed during the study period. Early detection, monitoring over treatment and early intervention of constipation could prevent serious consequences such as ileus.


Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos/efectos adversos , Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Estreñimiento/inducido químicamente , Estreñimiento/epidemiología , Esquizofrenia/tratamiento farmacológico , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aripiprazol , Clozapina/efectos adversos , Clozapina/uso terapéutico , Estreñimiento/tratamiento farmacológico , Enema , Impactación Fecal/inducido químicamente , Impactación Fecal/tratamiento farmacológico , Impactación Fecal/epidemiología , Femenino , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Lactulosa/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Piperazinas/efectos adversos , Piperazinas/uso terapéutico , Polietilenglicoles/uso terapéutico , Prevalencia , Quinolonas/efectos adversos , Quinolonas/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Risperidona/efectos adversos , Risperidona/uso terapéutico , Adulto Joven
16.
J Pediatr ; 157(4): 598-602, 2010 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20542295

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the beneficial effects of Lactobacillus reuteri (DSM 17938) in infants with functional chronic constipation. STUDY DESIGN: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study was conducted from January 2008 to December 2008 in 44 consecutive infants at least 6 months old (mean age+/-SD, 8.2+/-2.4 SD; male/female, 24/20) admitted to the Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and Motility Unit of the Department of Pediatrics, University "Federico II" of Naples, with a diagnosis of functional chronic constipation. The 44 infants with chronic constipation were randomly assigned to 2 groups: group A (n=22) received supplementation with the probiotic L reuteri (DSM 17938) and group B (n=22) received an identical placebo. Primary outcome measures were frequency of bowel movements per week, stool consistency, and presence of inconsolable crying episodes, recorded in a daily diary by parents. RESULTS: Infants receiving L reuteri (DSM 17938) had a significantly higher frequency of bowel movements than infants receiving a placebo at week 2 (P=.042), week 4 (P=.008), and week 8 (P=.027) of supplementation. In the L reuteri group, the stool consistency was reported as hard in 19 infants (86.4%) at baseline, in 11 infants (50%) at week 2, and in 4 infants (18.2%) at weeks 4 and 8. However, there was no significant difference between L reuteri and placebo groups in the stool consistency at all weeks (P=.63, week 2; P=.38, week 4; P=.48, week 8). Similarly, there was no statistically difference in the 2 groups in the presence of inconsolable crying episodes. No adverse effects were reported. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of L reuteri (DSM 17938) in infants with chronic constipation had a positive effect on bowel frequency, even when there was no improvement in stool consistency and episodes of inconsolable crying episodes. Because of their safety profile, probiotics may be an attractive option in the treatment of functional constipation.


Asunto(s)
Estreñimiento/epidemiología , Estreñimiento/microbiología , Impactación Fecal/epidemiología , Impactación Fecal/microbiología , Lactobacillus/aislamiento & purificación , Enfermedad Crónica , Estreñimiento/diagnóstico , Llanto , Método Doble Ciego , Impactación Fecal/diagnóstico , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Prevalencia , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
17.
Prev Vet Med ; 92(3): 179-87, 2009 Nov 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19758718

RESUMEN

Impaction colic is the single most common type of colic diagnosed in a large population of donkeys (more than 2000 animals) at The Donkey Sanctuary, UK and the fatality rate from the disease is high. Here we identify risk factors for impaction colic in this population during 2006 using an unmatched case control study. There were 71 cases of impaction colic and multivariable analysis identified a number of variables associated with the disease. Management factors that increased the risk of impaction included paper bedding, feeding of concentrates, limited access to pasture and increasing number of carers. In addition health variables that were associated with an increased risk of impaction colic were weight loss, recent vaccination and a number of dental abnormalities. This study has identified variables which may help to identify donkeys at high risk of impaction colic; those with a history of weight loss and with concurrent dental pathology. Furthermore the study has also identified a number of variables that may be targeted to reduce the incidence of impaction colic in this donkey population, such as modification of concentrate feeding practices and pasture access.


Asunto(s)
Cólico/veterinaria , Equidae , Impactación Fecal/veterinaria , Envejecimiento , Animales , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Cólico/epidemiología , Cólico/prevención & control , Recolección de Datos , Impactación Fecal/epidemiología , Impactación Fecal/prevención & control , Vivienda para Animales , Incidencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Enfermedades Estomatognáticas/veterinaria , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Reino Unido/epidemiología
18.
J Pediatr Surg ; 43(5): 889-92, 2008 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18485960

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: A fecalith is a fecal concretion that can obstruct the appendix leading to acute appendicitis. We hypothesized that the presence of a fecalith would lead to an earlier appendiceal perforation. METHODS: Between January 2001 and December 2005, the charts of all patients younger than 18 years old who underwent appendectomy at our institution were reviewed. Duration of symptoms and timing between presentation and operation were noted along with radiologic, operative, and pathologic findings. RESULTS: There were 388 patients who met the study criteria. A fecalith was present in 31% of patients (n = 121). The appendix was perforated in 57% of patients who had a fecalith vs 36% in patients without a fecalith (P < .001). The overall rate of interval appendectomies was 12%. A fecalith was present on the initial radiologic studies of 36% of the patients who had interval appendectomies, and the appendix was perforated significantly sooner in these patients when compared to those without a fecalith (91 vs 150 hours; P = .036). CONCLUSION: The presence of fecalith is associated with earlier and higher rates of appendiceal perforation in pediatric patients with acute appendicitis. An expedient appendectomy should therefore be performed in the pediatric patient with a radiologic evidence of fecalith.


Asunto(s)
Apendicitis/epidemiología , Impactación Fecal/epidemiología , Apendicectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Apendicitis/cirugía , Causalidad , Niño , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Ohio/epidemiología
19.
Colorectal Dis ; 10(1): 84-8, 2008 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17441968

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: There is no objective means to assess the obstructed defaecation syndrome (ODS), to allow evaluation of outcome or to compare the efficacy of treatment including surgery. The study aimed to validate a disease-specific index to quantify severity to allow assessment of the results of treatment in clinical trials, to permit comparison between them. METHOD: Seventy-six patients with ODS and 30 healthy controls entered the study after proctologic and ano-rectal physiological investigation. Hirschsprung's disease and slow transit constipation were excluded. An eight-item questionnaire with four or five possible answers was administered by two independent researchers at two different times. The ODS score was the sum of all points with a maximum possible of 31 points. Agreement between the two operators was evaluated by the Kappa coefficient for each single item. The coefficient of repeatability (CR) was assessed by the Bland and Altman plot. The internal consistency was evaluated by the Crohnbach-alpha test. A cluster analysis was carried out on each clinical finding. The Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compare median ODS score between patients and controls. RESULTS: The ODS score of the two operators was normally distributed and strongly correlated (r = 0.89). The correlation coefficient between the score assigned to each item by two operators ranged from 0.79 to 0.98. The degree of agreement between the operators was good and the two methods were reproducible (CR = 3.13). There was a significant difference between the mean ODS score for patients and controls (t = 20.70, P < 0.001). The Crohnbach alpha value for internal reliability was +0.513. Cluster analysis showed a different profile between cluster 1 (a nonhomogenous group including rectocoele, intussusception or perineal descent), and cluster 2 (pelvic dysynergia). CONCLUSION: The ODS score offers a validated severity of disease index in grading the severity of disease and monitoring the efficacy of therapy.


Asunto(s)
Estreñimiento/diagnóstico , Impactación Fecal/diagnóstico , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Análisis por Conglomerados , Estreñimiento/epidemiología , Estreñimiento/terapia , Defecografía , Impactación Fecal/epidemiología , Impactación Fecal/terapia , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Obstrucción Intestinal/diagnóstico , Obstrucción Intestinal/epidemiología , Obstrucción Intestinal/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Probabilidad , Valores de Referencia , Medición de Riesgo , Perfil de Impacto de Enfermedad , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Síndrome , Resultado del Tratamiento
20.
Rev Enferm ; 30(5): 42-8, 2007 May.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17623945

RESUMEN

Bed ridden patients commonly suffer a series of intestinal disorders which include: loss of appetite, swallowing disorders, a tendency to undergo gastric tract reflux, slowness in intestinal movements, accumulation of gas or fecal impactation. These contribute to an increased risk of potentially dangerous complications such as intestinal obstruction which can lead to necrosis or a perforation of different parts of the digestive tract, duodenal ulcer, hemorrhoids, or anal fissures.


Asunto(s)
Impactación Fecal/epidemiología , Enfermedades Intestinales/prevención & control , Reposo en Cama , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Enfermedades Intestinales/epidemiología , Enfermedades Intestinales/enfermería
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...