Favorable surgical and obstetrical outcomes in pre- and postconceptional laparoscopic abdominal cerclage: a large multicenter cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Cervical incompetence is an important cause of extremely preterm delivery. Without specialized treatment, cervical incompetence has a 30% chance of recurrence in a subsequent pregnancy. Recently, the first randomized controlled trial showed significant superiority of abdominal cerclage compared with both high and low vaginal cerclage in preventing preterm delivery at <32 weeks of gestation and fetal loss in patients with a previous failed vaginal cerclage. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess surgical and obstetrical outcomes in patients with pre- and postconceptional laparoscopic abdominal cerclage placement. Furthermore, it also aimed to perform subgroup analysis based on the indication for cerclage placement in order to identify patients who benefit the most from an abdominal cerclage. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective multicenter cohort study with consecutive inclusion of all eligible patients from 1997 onward in the Dutch cohort (104 patients) and from 2007 onward in the Boston cohort (169 patients) was conducted. Eligible patients had at least 1 second- or third-trimester fetal loss due to cervical incompetence and/or a short or absent cervix after cervical surgery. This includes loop electrosurgical excision procedure, conization, or trachelectomy. Patients were divided into the following subgroups based on the indication for cerclage placement: (1) previous failed vaginal cerclage, (2) previous cervical surgery, and (3) other indications. The third group consisted of patients with a history of multiple second- or early third-trimester fetal losses due to cervical incompetence (without a failed vaginal cerclage) and/or multiple dilation and curettage procedures. The primary outcome measure was delivery at ≥34 weeks of gestation with neonatal survival at hospital discharge. Secondary outcome measures included surgical and obstetrical outcomes, such as pregnancy rates after preconceptional surgery, obstetrical complications, and fetal survival rates. RESULTS: A total of 273 patients were included (250 in the preconceptional and 23 in the postconceptional cohort). Surgical outcomes of 273 patients were favorable, with 6 minor complications (2.2%). In the postconceptional cohort, 1 patient (0.4%) had hemorrhage of 650 mL, resulting in conversion to laparotomy. After preconceptional laparoscopic abdominal cerclage (n=250), the pregnancy rate was 74.1% (n=137) with a minimal follow-up of 12 months. Delivery at ³34 weeks of gestation occurred in 90.5% of all ongoing pregnancies. Four patients (3.3%) had a second-trimester fetal loss. The indication for cerclage in all 4 patients was a previous failed vaginal cerclage. The other subgroups showed fetal survival rates of 100% in ongoing pregnancies, with a total fetal survival rate of 96%. After postconceptional placement, 94.1% of all patients with an ongoing pregnancy delivered at ³34 weeks of gestation, with a total fetal survival rate of 100%. Thus, second-trimester fetal losses did not occur in this group. CONCLUSION: Pre- and postconceptional laparoscopic abdominal cerclage is a safe procedure with favorable obstetrical outcomes in patients with increased risk of cervical incompetence. All subgroups showed high fetal survival rates. Second-trimester fetal loss only occurred in the group of patients with a cerclage placed for the indication of previous failed vaginal cerclage, but was nevertheless rare even in this group.

The effectiveness of transabdominal cerclage placement via laparoscopy or laparotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Failure or technical impossibility to place a prophylactic transvaginal cerclage in women with cervical insufficiency justifies the need for an abdominal cerclage. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we studied the obstetrical and surgical outcomes of laparoscopic and open laparotomy abdominal cerclage approaches performed before (interval) or during pregnancy. DATA SOURCES: We performed a systematic literature search in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for studies on laparoscopic and open laparotomy abdominal cerclage placement in February 2022. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: All studies on laparoscopic or open laparotomy placement of an abdominal cerclage with at least 2 patients that reported on our primary outcomes were included. METHODS: All included studies were assessed for quality and risk of bias with an adjusted Quality in Prognosis Study tool. Random effects meta-analyses were performed for the primary outcomes, namely fetal survival and gestational age at delivery. RESULTS: Our search yielded 83 studies with a total of 3398 patients; 1869 of those underwent laparoscopic cerclage placement and 1529 underwent open laparotomy placements. No studies directly compared the 2 cerclage approaches. The survival (overall, 91.2%) and gestational age at delivery (overall, 36.6 weeks) were not statistically different between the approaches. For the procedure during pregnancy, the laparoscopic group showed significantly less blood loss >400 mL (0% vs 3%), a slightly lower procedure-related fetal loss (0% vs 1%), a shorter hospital stay but a longer operation duration than the open laparotomy group. For the interval cerclages, the laparoscopic group showed significantly fewer wound infections (0% vs 3%) and a shorter hospital stay than the open laparotomy group, but showed comparable offspring preterm birth and survival rates. CONCLUSION: Based on indirect comparisons, the laparoscopic and open laparotomy abdominal cerclage placements at interval or during pregnancy produced similar outcomes in terms of survival and gestational age at delivery. There are some small differences in perioperative care, surgical complications, interventions, and complications during pregnancy. This implies that both methods of abdominal cerclage placement have high success rates and thus we cannot conclude that one of the methods is superior for the placement of an abdominal cerclage.

Effectiveness and perinatal outcomes of history-indicated, ultrasound-indicated and physical examination-indicated cerclage: a retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and perinatal outcomes of cerclage procedure according to indication. METHODS: The pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of the patients who underwent cerclage with the diagnosis of cervical insufficiency between January 2016 and December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were categorized into three groups: a history-indicated group, an ultrasound-indicated group and a physical examination-indicated group. RESULTS: Seventy-three patients who underwent cerclage were included in the study. Of these, 41 (56.2%) had history-indicated, 17 (23.3%) had ultrasound-indicated and 15 (20.5%) had physical examination-indicated cerclages. Compared to history- and ultrasound-indicated cerclage group, duration from cerclage to delivery (18.6 ± 6.9 weeks vs 17.8±5.9 weeks vs 11 ± 5.3 weeks, p = 0.003) was significantly lower and delivery < 28 weeks (9.8% vs 5.9% vs 33.3%, p = 0.042) and delivery < 34 weeks of gestation (26.8% vs 11.8% vs 60%, p = 0.009) were significantly higher in physical examination-indicated cerclage group. In physical examination-indicated cerclage, compared with history- and ultrasound-indicated cerclage low birth weight, low APGAR score, neonatal intensive care unit admission and neonatal mortality were higher, although not statistically significant (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Pregnant women who underwent physical examination-indicated cerclage had higher risks for preterm delivery < 28 weeks and < 34 weeks than history- and ultrasound-indicated cerclage.

Diagnosis of intraamniotic inflammation by measuring vaginal interleukin-6 in patients with cervical insufficiency: could amniocentesis be avoided?

BACKGROUND: Cervical insufficiency is a recurrent, passive, and painless dilation of the cervix in the second trimester. The etiology is unclear, but there may be an association with subclinical intraamniotic infection. Interleukin-6 (IL-6) production in the amniotic cavity is induced by bacterial invasion, it is the major proinflammatory cytokine released in response to infection. Although the gold standard method to measure it is through an amniocentesis, the procedure constitutes an invasive technique with several associated risks. The objective of this study is to determine if there is a correlation between intraamniotic and vaginal IL-6 in patients with cervical insufficiency and bulging membranes during the second trimester of pregnancy, in order to avoid an amniocentesis before the rescue cerclage. METHODS: A cohort study was performed in which all patients with cervical insufficiency and bulging membranes admitted into our tertiary hospital between 2019 and 2020 were included, and a control group of asymptomatic women in the second trimester of gestation where studied at the same time. Patients with bulging membranes underwent an amniocentesis to quantify amniotic IL-6, and a sample of vaginal fluid for vaginal IL-6 determination was obtained from both the study and the control group. RESULTS: A total of 20 women were included in each group. Median gestational age at diagnosis was 22 weeks in patients with bulging membranes, and 21 weeks in the control group. Vaginal IL-6 in control group (10.875 pg/mL) is much lower than the study group one (1308.77 pg/ml). In patients with bulging membranes, vaginal IL-6 expression was lower in the vagina than in the amniotic cavity [average IL-6 in the amniotic cavity 26890.07 pg/mL, vs 1308.77 pg/mL in the vagina (p < .01)]. Through a Spearman coefficient correlation rank [rho = 0.709 (p < .001)], there is a positive correlation between amniotic and vaginal IL-6 values. The best value of this correlation was calculated with the ROC curve, being the area under the curve 0.929 (CI 95% 0.721-0.995), and the cutoff of point less than 61.4 pg/ml (sensitivity 83.33%; specificity 92.86%). Patients with vaginal IL-6 < 61.4 pg/ml associated a longer latency time between diagnosis and delivery, a higher neonatal weight and a lower perinatal mortality. Rescue cerclage in vaginal IL-6 < 61.4 pg/ml was the best predictor of good pregnancy outcome. CONCLUSION: There is a correlation between intraamniotic and vaginal IL-6 in patients with cervical insufficiency and bulging membranes during the second trimester of pregnancy. However, further studies are needed in order to considerate the avoidance of an amniocentesis before an emergency cerclage.

Retro cervical tunneling to ensure correct placement for robotic-assisted transabdominal cerclage.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the step-by-step surgical technique of robotic-assisted transabdominal cerclage, highlighting a new posterior compartment approach. DESIGN: Stepwise explanation of a surgical technique using surgical video. SETTING: The procedure was performed at the Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hospital Vall d'Hebron in Barcelona, Spain, a tertiary medical center. The local institutional review board considers that case reports are exempt from research approval. PATIENT(S): A 26-year-old non-pregnant patient, with a history of cervical incompetence, three second-trimester losses, and vaginal cerclage failure during her previous pregnancy. INTERVENTION(S): Robotic-assisted transabdominal cerclage placement was performed. An 8-mm, 30° scope; monopolar scissors; and Maryland bipolar graspers were used. A uterine manipulator was used for better exposure. First, a bladder flap was created, and the uterine vessels were identified and skeletonized. Next, a window between the uterine vessels and the uterine cervix at the level of the cervical-isthmic junction was created bilaterally. At the posterior compartment, the dissection of the root of the uterosacral ligaments was carefully performed. A retrocervical pocket was created with monopolar scissors and sharp dissection. The procedure was finished with the Mersilene tape placement. First, the tape was passed through the window created in the right broad ligament, with a posterior-to-anterior direction, the retro cervical pocket, and finally through the left broad ligament. The knot was placed anteriorly and reperitonization was performed. In addition to this operation, robotic-assisted transabdominal cerclage was successfully performed in another six patients with good surgical and obstetrics outcomes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Intraoperative technique to ensure successful robot-assisted abdominal cerclage placement. RESULT(S): The patient became pregnant six months following the robotic-assisted transabdominal cerclage. Her pregnancy was closely followed up at the High-Risk Obstetric Unit, and she had no complications during pregnancy. An elective cesarean section was performed at 36 weeks with a healthy newborn baby that was discharged with the mother three days after delivery. CONCLUSION(S): The development of a retro cervical pocket during robotic-assisted transabdominal cerclage can be performed safely and effectively. It may help prevent displacement of the Mersilene tape during endoscopic knotting.

The use of PAMG-1 testing in patients with preterm labor, intact membranes and a short sonographic cervix reduces the rate of unnecessary antenatal glucocorticoid administration.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the frequency of antenatal corticosteroid (ACS) administration in cases with shortened cervical length by addition of placental alpha-microglobulin-1 (PAMG-1) testing to sonographic examination. METHODS: Single centre retrospective cohort study. Rate of ACS administration was compared between cases with cervical length between 15 and 25 mm and cases with positive PAMG-1 testing and cervical length between 15 and 25 mm. We evaluated the following outcome parameters: Rate of ACS administration, gestational age at delivery, time to delivery, delivery within seven days, delivery <34 and <37 weeks' gestation, rate of admission to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). RESULTS: In total, 130 cases were included. "PAMG-1 group" consisted of 68 women, 62 cases built the "historical control group". ACS administration was performed less frequently in the "PAMG-1 cohort" (18 (26%) vs. 46 (74%); p<0.001). The rate of delivery within seven days did not differ (2 (3%) vs. 4 (6.5%); p=0.4239). The rates of delivery <34 weeks' gestation (7 (10%) vs. 9 (15%); p=0.4643) and <37 weeks' gestation (19 (28%) vs. 26 (42%); p=0.0939) did not differ. Time to delivery interval was longer in the PAMG-1 group (61.5 vs. 43 days, p=0.0117). NICU admission occurred more often in the "historical control group" (22 (38%) vs. 28 (60%); p=0.0272). CONCLUSIONS: Addition of biomarker testing can help to avoid unnecessary ACS administrations in women with shortened cervical length.

Antibody microarray analysis of the amniotic fluid proteome for predicting the outcome of rescue cerclage in patients with cervical insufficiency.

Little is known about the biomarkers that can identify patient candidates suitable for rescue cerclage procedure. The purpose of the study was to identify novel biomarkers in amniotic fluid (AF) that can predict the outcome of rescue cerclage in patients with cervical insufficiency by using an antibody microarray. This case-control study was conducted using AF samples collected from singleton pregnant women who underwent rescue cerclage following a diagnosis of cervical insufficiency (19-25 weeks). Patients were divided into case (n=20) and control (n=20) groups based on the occurrence of spontaneous preterm delivery (SPTD) at <34 weeks of gestation after cerclage placement. The AF proteomes were analyzed using an antibody microarray for biomarker discovery work. Ten candidate biomarkers of interest were validated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Thirty-one molecules studied showed significant intergroup differences (≥two-fold change in signal intensity). Validation by ELISA confirmed significantly higher levels of a proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL), S100 calcium-binding protein A8/A9 complex (S100 A8/A9), tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1), macrophage inflammatory protein-1α (MIP-1α), and interleukin-8 (IL-8) in women who had SPTD at <34 weeks. Of these, AF S100 A8/A9 and TIMP-1 levels were independent of other potentially confounding factors (e.g., cervical dilatation). S100 A8/A9 had the highest area under the curve (AUC) at 0.857. Using protein-antibody microarray technology, we identified differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) and several novel biomarkers (APRIL, IL-8, MIP-1α, S100 A8/A9, and TIMP-1) in AF from women who had SPTB at <34 weeks after cerclage for cervical insufficiency. These data can provide an insight into the molecular mechanisms underlying SPTD after rescue cerclage in patients with cervical insufficiency.

COL1A1, COL4A3, TIMP2 and TGFB1 polymorphisms in cervical insufficiency.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the association between selected single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with cervical insufficiency and its relationship with obstetric history. METHODS: Twenty-eight women with cervical insufficiency (case group) and 29 non-pregnant women (control group) were included. The SNPs sequenced included rs2586490 in collagen type I alpha 1 chain (COL1A1), rs1882435 in collagen type IV alpha 3 chain (COL4A3), rs2277698 in metallopeptidase inhibitor 2 (TIMP2), and rs1800468 in transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGFB1). RESULTS: We found a higher frequency of the normal allele in the control group (65.5%) and the homozygous mutated genotype in the case group (64.3%) for rs2586490 in COL1A1 (p=0.023). An unplanned finding in the cervical insufficiency group was a higher gestational age of delivery (median≥38 weeks) in the mutated allele than in the wild-type genotype (median of 28.2 weeks) for rs2857396, which is also in the COL1A1 gene (p=0.011). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the present study corroborate the hypothesis that cervical insufficiency has a genetic component and probably involves genes encoding proteins in the extracellular matrix, in addition to inflammatory processes.

Development and validation of a model for individualized prediction of cervical insufficiency risks in patients undergoing IVF/ICSI treatment.

BACKGROUND: Women who conceived with in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) are more likely to experience adverse pregnancy outcomes than women who conceived naturally. Cervical insufficiency (CI) is one of the important causes of miscarriage and premature birth, however there is no published data available focusing on the potential risk factors predicting CI occurrence in women who received IVF/ICSI treatment. This study aimed to identify the risk factors that could be integrated into a predictive model for CI, which could provide further personalized and clinically specific information related to the incidence of CI after IVF/ICSI treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 4710 patients who conceived after IVF/ICSI treatment from Jan 2011 to Dec 2018 at a public university hospital. The patients were randomly divided into development (n = 3108) and validation (n = 1602) samples for the building and testing of the nomogram, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression was developed on the basis of pre-pregnancy clinical covariates assessed for their association with CI occurrence. RESULTS: A total of 109 patients (2.31%) experienced CI among all the enrolled patients. Body mass index (BMI), basal serum testosterone (T), gravidity and uterine length were associated with CI occurrence. The statistical nomogram was built based on BMI, serum T, gravidity and uterine length, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.84 (95% confidence interval: 0.76-0.90) for the developing cohort. The AUC for the validation cohort was 0.71 (95% confidence interval: 0.69-0.83), showing a satisfactory goodness-of-fit and discrimination ability in this nomogram. CONCLUSION: The user-friendly nomogram which graphically represents the risk factors and a pre-pregnancy predicted tool for the incidence of CI in patients undergoing IVF/ICSI treatment, provides a useful guide for medical staff on individualized decisions making, where preventive measures could be carried out during the IVF/ICSI procedure and subsequent pregnancy.

Cervical insufficiency: a noteworthy disease with controversies.

Cervical insufficiency (CI) is a mainly disease leading to recurrent abortions and preterm birth which may present in about 1% of obstetric populations. Recurrent pregnancy losses caused by CI incur serious economic burdens on society as well as huge psychological burdens to family members. However, many patients even clinicians in some areas of the world still remain confused about this disease. At the same time, the etiology of CI is still uncertain and it is still a controversial disease in diagnosis and treatment. This article summarizes the potential risk factors associated with CI, which could be worthy of attention and helpful for future research. It also reviews the methods for diagnosis and treatment of CI to better understand this noteworthy disease, as well as presents the related consensus and controversies according to the newly updated guidelines, which has practical significance for conducting more in-depth investigations in the future.

Laparoscopic abdominal cerclage: a highly effective option for refractory cervical insufficiency.

Laparoscopic abdominal cerclage is emerging as the preferred treatment option for patients with refractory cervical insufficiency. Laparoscopic abdominal cerclage reduces second-trimester loss and preterm birth with success rates similar to open abdominal cerclage. Increasing evidence also suggests improved neonatal survival rates with abdominal cerclage compared with repeat vaginal cerclage in patients who delivered prematurely despite a vaginal cerclage. The option to perform a highly effective treatment using minimally invasive techniques suggests laparoscopic abdominal cerclage will become the standard of care for refractory cervical insufficiency. This review examines the literature with regard to the indications and outcomes of abdominal cerclage, highlighting the laparoscopic technique.

Cervical cerclage - history and contemporary use.

OBJECTIVE: Contemporary role of cerclage as a preterm birth treatment. DESIGN: Review article. SETTING: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the First Faculty of Medicine and General Teaching Hospital in Prague. METHODS: Research of existing literature, predominantly foreign journal articles, but also Czech literature and personal experience with the method. RESULTS: Cerclage is one of the well-known surgical procedures carried out during pregnancy. Its aim is to provide a mechanical support to the cervical canal and to keep the cervix closed. The cervical mucous plug serves as a mechanical barrier between the vagina and the uterine cavity, but it also contains many immune components which protect the fetal compartment from ascendent infections. Application of a cervical stitch can help to retain the mucous plug and thus increases the immunity of the cervical canal. Results of 15 randomised studies (Cochraine Database of Systematic R) suggest that in women with increased risk of preterm birth, cerclage decreases the occurrence of preterm birth relative to the expectant management. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the decreasing numbers of cerclage surgeries, it is still a useful method of preterm birth prevention for a specific group of women. More recently, a progesterone treatment has gained popularity. Its application, however, must begin before the 16th week of pregnancy.

No. 373-Cervical Insufficiency and Cervical Cerclage.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this guideline is to provide a framework that clinicians can use to determine which women are at greatest risk of having cervical insufficiency and in which set of circumstances a cerclage is of potential value. EVIDENCE: Published literature was retrieved through searches of PubMed or Medline, CINAHL, and The Cochrane Library in 2018 using appropriate controlled vocabulary (e.g., uterine cervical incompetence) and key words (e.g., cervical insufficiency, cerclage, Shirodkar, cerclage, McDonald, cerclage, abdominal, cervical length, mid-trimester pregnancy loss). Results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized control trials/controlled clinical trials, and observational studies. There were no date or language restrictions. Searches were updated on a regular basis and incorporated in the guideline to June 2018. Grey (unpublished) literature was identified through searching the websites of health technology assessment and health technology-related agencies, clinical practice guideline collections, clinical trial registries, and national and international medical specialty societies. VALUES: The quality of evidence in this document was rated using the criteria described in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.

A multidisciplinary approach to pregnancy loss: the pregnancy loss prevention center.

Background Pregnancy loss is probably the most common problem faced by women worldwide. There are differences in the rates of early and late pregnancy loss based on geography among the developing compared with the developed nations of the world. Most physicians worldwide have different criteria for treating pregnancy loss. Although pregnancy loss is not a disease, it might be best approached with a medical evaluation in order to define the cause and offer specific treatment. Methods This report describes the results obtained by a multi-disciplinary pregnancy loss prevention center in the initial 104 patients. Results The most common diagnoses were Asherman syndrome (intrauterine adhesions), cervical insufficiency and uterine fibroids, accounting for 47% of the patients. When the diagnosis was not obtained, which occurred in 19% of the patients, in vitro fertilization (IVF) was the treatment provided. Specifically diagnosed and treated patients achieved a 91% success rate. The 19 patients without a specific diagnosis who were treated with IVF had a 60% success rate. Thus patients for whom it was possible to specifically diagnose and treat had better results (P<0.01 t-test). There was an overall success rate of 87% including patients lost to follow-up with this multidisciplinary medical approach. Conclusion A pregnancy loss prevention center using the described multidisciplinary model can accomplish success rates of 85-90%. Preventing recurrent pregnancy loss we suggest can best be achieved by a dedicated center with a multidisciplinary medical approach.

Don't be short-sighted: cervical incompetence in a pregnant patient with acute appendicitis.

Delay in diagnosis of cervical incompetence can be detrimental to the fetus. Up to 20-25% of miscarriages in the second trimester can be attributed to the incompetent cervix. Given the profound impact of cervical incompetence on obstetric outcomes, careful attention should be given to evaluation of the cervix on MRI studies in pregnant patients. We present a case of incompetent cervix diagnosed incidentally at the time of MRI performed to evaluate for acute appendicitis.

Independent association between uterine malformations and cervical insufficiency: a retrospective population-based cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to explore maternal and fetal outcomes in the second and third trimester in women with uterine malformations. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective population-based cohort study including women with a diagnosis of uterine malformation arised from workup for infertility or recurrent pregnancy loss, was accidental during pregnancy, or was noticed at the time of cesarean delivery. RESULTS: A total of 280,721 pregnancies met the inclusion criteria and were divided into two study groups: (1) pregnancies in women with uterine malformations (n = 1099); and (2) controls (n = 279,662). The rate of women presenting uterine malformations was 0.39%. The prevalence of cervical os insufficiency was significantly higher in women with a uterine malformation than in the control group (3.6 vs. 0.4%, p < 0.001). A multivariate analysis, performed to evaluate risk factors for cervical insufficiency in women with uterine malformations. Mullerian anomalies (OR 6.19, 95% CI 4.41-8.70, p < 0.001), maternal age (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.04-1.06, p < 0.001), recurrent abortions (OR 12.93, 95% CI 11.43-14.62, p < 0.001), and ethnicity (OR 2.86, 95% CI 2.454-3.34, p < 0.001) were found to be independently associated with the development of cervical insufficiency. CONCLUSION: Uterine anomalies have a strong association with cervical insufficiency. Women with uterine anomalies have an increased risk to develop pregnancy complications that arise from a loss in cervical function during the midtrimester or early third trimester.

[Clinical outcome of therapeutic cervical cerclage in short cervix syndrome].

Objective: To investigate the clinical effect of therapeutic cervical cerclage on short cervix syndrome for anti-premature birth in the second trimester. Methods: Totally 44 singleton pregnant patients were diagnosed as short cervix syndrome, which was cervical length ≤2.5 cm without cervical dilatation, and received treatment from January 2008 and July 2015 in Peking University Third Hospital were collected. Among them, 30 patients who received therapeutic cervical cerclage were defined as cerclage group and another 14 cases who received conservative treatment were defined as un-cerclage group. The days of conservative treatment, delivery rate of different gestational weeks, birth weight of newborns, neonatal survival rate within 7 days of birth were analyzed between the two groups. Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups in days of pregnancy conservative treatment [103 (84-141) vs 105 (85-114) days], delivery weeks [38.0 (35.5-39.4) vs 38.5 (37.3-39.5) weeks], birth weight of newborns [3 120 (2 750-3 400) vs 3 130 (2 760-3 545) g], and survival rate of newborns [100% (30/30) vs 13/14]. The fetuses of both groups were all delivered after 28 weeks. There was no significant difference in accumulated delivery rate between the two groups after 32 weeks, 34 weeks, and 37 weeks, respectively (all P>0.05) . Conclusions: The treatment of cervical cerclage is not superior to conservative means in single pregnancy of cervical length ≤2.5 cm without cervical dilatation. For such patients with short cervix syndrome, the treatment of cervical cerclage may not be necessary, but dynamic monitoring and search for the causing factors and prompt treatment are more important.

The role of predictive vaginal biomarkers in women with cervical cerclage.

Cervical cerclage is currently one of the primary methods of treatment for cervical insufficiency (CI). Identifying methods in order to selectively apply cerclage may allow us to further limit unnecessary procedures. In this regard, a limited number of inflammatory and extracellular matrix biomarkers measurable non-invasively at the level of the cervix have been examined. In this review we summarize the current research on the use of cervical biomarkers in predicting cerclage failure and propose potential objectives for future research.

Current options for mechanical prevention of preterm birth.

Cervical insufficiency can be defined by a combination of obstetric history, cervical dilation on exam, and/or short cervical length in women with prior preterm birth. Options for mechanical intervention include cerclage and pessary. There is evidence to support the benefit of a cervical cerclage in women with singleton gestations who have a diagnosis of cervical insufficiency either based on second trimester painless cervical dilatation leading to recurrent early preterm births, or a history of early spontaneous preterm birth and a second trimester transvaginal ultrasound short cervical length or cervical dilation on exam. For women with multiple gestations, the benefit of a cerclage is uncertain, and further study is warranted. The pessary has also been studied for mechanical prevention of preterm birth in various populations, however the results so far have been mixed and warrants further study prior to routine use.

Factors associated with delivery at or after 28 weeks gestation in women with bulging fetal membranes before 26 weeks gestation.

OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the factors that contribute to prolonged pregnancy and promote neonate survival in women with bulging fetal membranes. METHODS: A database was reviewed to identify women with singleton pregnancies who underwent amniocentesis on admission to determine amniotic fluid neutrophil elastase levels before 26 + 0 weeks gestation between July 2001 and January 2015. Following delivery, the placentas of these patients were examined for histologic chorioamnionitis. RESULTS: Ninety-seven women delivered before 28 weeks gestation, and 117 women delivered at or after 28 weeks gestation. Rescue cerclage performed via the McDonald procedure (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 3.78; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.35-11.80) was associated with a higher likelihood of reaching at least 28 weeks gestation before delivery, whereas protruding membranes (aOR: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.18-0.78), elevated amniotic neutrophil elastase levels (≥0.15 µg/ml) (aOR, 0.41; 95% CI: 0.20-0.82) and elevated peripheral C-reactive protein levels (≥0.4 mg/dl) (aOR: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.180.65) were associated with a significantly reduced likelihood of reaching this gestational age before delivery. Among women who underwent rescue cerclage, amniorrhexis was associated with a negative prognosis (aOR: 0.18; 95% CI: 0.05-0.51). CONCLUSIONS: Intra-amniotic inflammation, protrusion of fetal membranes and amniorrhexis are factors that may prevent pregnancy prolongation. Rescue cerclage improves pregnancy outcomes.