Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 2.176
Filtrar
1.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 20(1): 2346963, 2024 Dec 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38745461

RESUMEN

COVID-19, caused by SARS-CoV-2, and meningococcal disease, caused by Neisseria meningitidis, are relevant infectious diseases, preventable through vaccination. Outer membrane vesicles (OMVs), released from Gram-negative bacteria, such as N. meningitidis, present adjuvant characteristics and may confer protection against meningococcal disease. Here, we evaluated in mice the humoral and cellular immune response to different doses of receptor binding domain (RBD) of SARS-CoV-2 adjuvanted by N. meningitidis C:2a:P1.5 OMVs and aluminum hydroxide, as a combined preparation for these pathogens. The immunization induced IgG antibodies of high avidity for RBD and OMVs, besides IgG that recognized the Omicron BA.2 variant of SARS-CoV-2 with intermediary avidity. Cellular immunity showed IFN-γ and IL-4 secretion in response to RBD and OMV stimuli, demonstrating immunologic memory and a mixed Th1/Th2 response. Offspring presented transferred IgG of similar levels and avidity as their mothers. Humoral immunity did not point to the superiority of any RBD dose, but the group immunized with a lower antigenic dose (0.5 µg) had the better cellular response. Overall, OMVs enhanced RBD immunogenicity and conferred an immune response directed to N. meningitidis too.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antivirales , COVID-19 , Inmunoglobulina G , Neisseria meningitidis , SARS-CoV-2 , Animales , Ratones , Inmunoglobulina G/sangre , Neisseria meningitidis/inmunología , Femenino , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Anticuerpos Antivirales/inmunología , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/inmunología , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Adyuvantes Inmunológicos/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/inmunología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Inmunidad Celular , Inmunidad Humoral , Ratones Endogámicos BALB C , Infecciones Meningocócicas/prevención & control , Infecciones Meningocócicas/inmunología , Glicoproteína de la Espiga del Coronavirus/inmunología , Adyuvantes de Vacunas/administración & dosificación , Hidróxido de Aluminio/administración & dosificación , Hidróxido de Aluminio/inmunología , Inmunización/métodos , Afinidad de Anticuerpos , Anticuerpos Antibacterianos/sangre , Anticuerpos Antibacterianos/inmunología , Vacunas Meningococicas/inmunología , Vacunas Meningococicas/administración & dosificación , Memoria Inmunológica , Células TH1/inmunología
2.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 73(15): 345-350, 2024 Apr 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38635488

RESUMEN

Meningococcal disease is a life-threatening invasive infection caused by Neisseria meningitidis. Two quadrivalent (serogroups A, C, W, and Y) meningococcal conjugate vaccines (MenACWY) (MenACWY-CRM [Menveo, GSK] and MenACWY-TT [MenQuadfi, Sanofi Pasteur]) and two serogroup B meningococcal vaccines (MenB) (MenB-4C [Bexsero, GSK] and MenB-FHbp [Trumenba, Pfizer Inc.]), are licensed and available in the United States and have been recommended by CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). On October 20, 2023, the Food and Drug Administration approved the use of a pentavalent meningococcal vaccine (MenACWY-TT/MenB-FHbp [Penbraya, Pfizer Inc.]) for prevention of invasive disease caused by N. meningitidis serogroups A, B, C, W, and Y among persons aged 10-25 years. On October 25, 2023, ACIP recommended that MenACWY-TT/MenB-FHbp may be used when both MenACWY and MenB are indicated at the same visit for the following groups: 1) healthy persons aged 16-23 years (routine schedule) when shared clinical decision-making favors administration of MenB vaccine, and 2) persons aged ≥10 years who are at increased risk for meningococcal disease (e.g., because of persistent complement deficiencies, complement inhibitor use, or functional or anatomic asplenia). Different manufacturers' serogroup B-containing vaccines are not interchangeable; therefore, when MenACWY-TT/MenB-FHbp is used, subsequent doses of MenB should be from the same manufacturer (Pfizer Inc.). This report summarizes evidence considered for these recommendations and provides clinical guidance for the use of MenACWY-TT/MenB-FHbp.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Meningocócicas , Vacunas Meningococicas , Neisseria meningitidis Serogrupo B , Neisseria meningitidis , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Comités Consultivos , Vacunas Combinadas , Inmunización , Infecciones Meningocócicas/prevención & control
3.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 20(1): 2333106, 2024 Dec 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38566502

RESUMEN

Vaccine co-administration is a useful strategy for improving vaccine coverage and adherence. In Italy, an update to the national immunization program (NIP) in 2023 included recommendations for co-administration of pediatric vaccines, including the four-component vaccine for meningococcus B (4CMenB), pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV), hexavalent vaccines, and oral rotavirus vaccines. Safety is a major concern when considering vaccine co-administration; therefore, a literature review of the available evidence on 4CMenB co-administration with PCV, hexavalent/pentavalent, and rotavirus vaccines was performed. Of 763 publications screened, two studies were reviewed that reported safety data on 4CMenB co-administration with PCV, hexavalent/pentavalent, and rotavirus vaccines in infants aged 0-24 months. Overall, these studies supported that there were no significant safety signals when co-administering 4CMenB with PCV, hexavalent/pentavalent, and rotavirus vaccines, compared with individual vaccination. This review provides key insights for healthcare professionals on the tolerability of co-administering 4CMenB with routine vaccines.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Meningocócicas , Vacunas Meningococicas , Humanos , Lactante , Infecciones Meningocócicas/prevención & control , Vacunas Meningococicas/administración & dosificación , Neisseria meningitidis Serogrupo B , Vacunas contra Rotavirus/administración & dosificación , Vacunación , Vacunas Conjugadas/administración & dosificación , Recién Nacido , Vacunas Neumococicas/administración & dosificación
4.
Expert Rev Vaccines ; 23(1): 445-462, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38517733

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The epidemiology of invasive meningococcal disease (IMD), a rare but potentially fatal illness, is typically described as unpredictable and subject to sporadic outbreaks. AREAS COVERED: Meningococcal epidemiology and vaccine use during the last ~ 200 years are examined within the context of meningococcal characterization and classification to guide future IMD prevention efforts. EXPERT OPINION: Historical and contemporary data highlight the dynamic nature of meningococcal epidemiology, with continued emergence of hyperinvasive clones and affected regions. Recent shifts include global increases in serogroup W disease, meningococcal antimicrobial resistance (AMR), and meningococcal urethritis; additionally, unvaccinated populations have experienced disease resurgences following lifting of COVID-19 restrictions. Despite these changes, a close analysis of meningococcal epidemiology indicates consistent dominance of serogroups A, B, C, W, and Y and elevated IMD rates among infants and young children, adolescents/young adults, and older adults. Demonstrably effective vaccines against all 5 major disease-causing serogroups are available, and their prophylactic use represents a powerful weapon against IMD, including AMR. The World Health Organization's goal of defeating meningitis by the year 2030 demands broad protection against IMD, which in turn indicates an urgent need to expand meningococcal vaccination programs across major disease-causing serogroups and age-related risk groups.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Meningocócicas , Vacunas Meningococicas , Neisseria meningitidis , Niño , Lactante , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Humanos , Preescolar , Anciano , Infecciones Meningocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Meningocócicas/prevención & control , Brotes de Enfermedades , Serogrupo , Vacunas Combinadas
5.
Vaccine ; 42(11): 2781-2792, 2024 Apr 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38508928

RESUMEN

Investigating the mechanisms by which W135 meningococcal conjugate (PSW135-TT) activates adaptive immune responses in mice can provide a comprehensive understanding of the immune mechanisms of bacterial polysaccharide conjugate vaccines. We compared B-cell and T-cell immune responses immunized with W135 meningococcal capsular polysaccharides (PSW135), tetanus toxoid (TT) and PSW135-TT in mice. The results showed that PSW135-TT could induce higher PSW135-specific and TT-specific IgG antibodies with a significant enhancement after two doses. All serum antibodies immunized with PSW135- TT had strong bactericidal activity, whereas none of the serum antibodies immunized with PSW135 had bactericidal activity. Besides, IgM and IgG antibodies immunized with PSW135-TT after two doses were positively correlated with the titer of bactericidal antibodies. We also found Th cells favored Th2 humoral immune responses in PSW135-TT, PSW135, and TT-immunized mice, especially peripheral blood lymphocytes. Furthermore, PSW135-TT and TT could effectively activate bone marrow derived dendritic cells (BMDCs) and promote BMDCs to highly express major histocompatibility complex Ⅱ (MHCⅡ), CD86 and CD40 molecules in mice, whereas PSW135 couldn't. These data verified the typical characteristics of PSW135-TT and TT as T cell dependent antigen (TD-Ag) and PSW135 as T cell independent antigen (TI-Ag), which will be very helpful for further exploration of the immune mechanism of polysaccharide-protein conjugate vaccines and improvement of the quality of bacterial polysaccharide conjugate vaccines in future.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Meningocócicas , Vacunas Meningococicas , Neisseria meningitidis Serogrupo W-135 , Animales , Ratones , Serogrupo , Toxoide Tetánico , Polisacáridos Bacterianos , Vacunas Conjugadas , Anticuerpos Antibacterianos , Inmunidad Celular , Inmunoglobulina G , Infecciones Meningocócicas/prevención & control
7.
Mol Cell Proteomics ; 23(3): 100734, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38342408

RESUMEN

Antigen-antibody interactions play a key role in the immune response post vaccination and the mechanism of action of antibody-based biopharmaceuticals. 4CMenB is a multicomponent vaccine against Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B in which factor H binding protein (fHbp) is one of the key antigens. In this study, we use hydrogen/deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) to identify epitopes in fHbp recognized by polyclonal antibodies (pAb) from two human donors (HDs) vaccinated with 4CMenB. Our HDX-MS data reveal several epitopes recognized by the complex mixture of human pAb. Furthermore, we show that the pAb from the two HDs recognize the same epitope regions. Epitope mapping of total pAb and purified fHbp-specific pAb from the same HD reveals that the two antibody samples recognize the same main epitopes, showing that HDX-MS based epitope mapping can, in this case at least, be performed directly using total IgG pAb samples that have not undergone Ab-selective purification. Two monoclonal antibodies (mAb) were previously produced from B-cell repertoire sequences from one of the HDs and used for epitope mapping of fHbp with HDX-MS. The epitopes identified for the pAb from the same HD in this study, overlap with the epitopes recognized by the two individual mAbs. Overall, HDX-MS epitope mapping appears highly suitable for simultaneous identification of epitopes recognized by pAb from human donors and to thus both guide vaccine development and study basic human immunity to pathogens, including viruses.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Meningocócicas , Vacunas Meningococicas , Neisseria meningitidis , Humanos , Mapeo Epitopo/métodos , Neisseria meningitidis/metabolismo , Deuterio/metabolismo , Proteínas Bacterianas/metabolismo , Infecciones Meningocócicas/prevención & control , Proteínas Portadoras , Medición de Intercambio de Deuterio , Factor H de Complemento , Antígenos Bacterianos , Epítopos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/metabolismo , Espectrometría de Masas de Intercambio de Hidrógeno-Deuterio
8.
Patient ; 17(3): 319-333, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38388957

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Qualitative research is fundamental for designing discrete choice experiments (DCEs) but is often underreported in the preference literature. We developed a DCE to elicit preferences for vaccination against invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) among adolescents and young people (AYP) and parents and legal guardians (PLG) in the United States. This article reports the targeted literature review and qualitative interviews that informed the DCE design and demonstrates how to apply the recent reporting guidelines for qualitative developmental work in preference studies. METHODS: This study included two parts: a targeted literature review and qualitative interviews. The Medline and Embase databases were searched for quantitative and qualitative studies on IMD and immunization. The results of the targeted literature review informed a qualitative interview guide. Sixty-minute, online, semi-structured interviews with AYP and PLG were used to identify themes related to willingness to be vaccinated against IMD. Participants were recruited through a third-party recruiter's database and commercial online panels. Interviews included vignettes about IMD and vaccinations and three thresholding exercises examining the effect of incidence rate, disability rate, and fatality rate on vaccination preferences. Participant responses related to the themes were counted. RESULTS: The targeted literature review identified 31 concepts that were synthesized into six topics for the qualitative interviews. Twenty AYP aged 16-23 years and 20 PLG of adolescents aged 11-17 years were interviewed. Four themes related to willingness to be vaccinated emerged: attitudes towards vaccination, knowledge and information, perception of IMD, and vaccine attributes. Most participants were concerned about IMD (AYP 60%; PLG 85%) and had positive views of vaccination (AYP 80%; PLG 60%). Ninety percent of AYP and 75% of PLG always chose vaccination over no vaccination, independent of IMD incidence rate, disability rate, or fatality rate. CONCLUSION: Willingness to be vaccinated against IMD was affected by vaccine attributes but largely insensitive to IMD incidence and severity. This article provides an example of how to apply the recent reporting guidelines for qualitative developmental work in preference studies, with 21 out of 22 items in the guidelines being considered.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Meningocócicas , Prioridad del Paciente , Investigación Cualitativa , Humanos , Infecciones Meningocócicas/prevención & control , Adolescente , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto Joven , Vacunas Meningococicas/administración & dosificación , Entrevistas como Asunto , Adulto , Estados Unidos , Conducta de Elección , Padres/psicología , Niño , Vacunación
10.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 20(1): 2313872, 2024 Dec 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38348600

RESUMEN

Meningococcal vaccination strategies in China are intricate, including multiple vaccines targeting different serogroups. The current National Immunization Program (NIP) includes two polysaccharide vaccines for serogroups A and C (MPV-A and MPV-AC), covering limited serogroups and requiring adaptation. This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of replacing the current strategy with alternative strategies utilizing non-NIP vaccines to inform policy decisions. From a societal perspective, a decision tree-Markov model was constructed to simulate the economic and health consequences of meningococcal disease in a 2019 birth cohort with four vaccination strategies. Epidemiology, vaccine efficacy, cost, and other parameters were derived from previous studies. We conducted sensitivity analyses to assess the robustness of the findings and explored prices for non-NIP vaccines that enable cost-effective strategies. Compared to the current strategy, alternative strategies using quadrivalent polysaccharide vaccine (MPV-4), bivalent conjugate vaccine (MCV-AC), and quadrivalent conjugate vaccine (MCV-4) could avoid 91, 286, and 455 more meningococcal cases. The ICERs were estimated at approximately $250 thousand/QALY, $450 thousand/QALY, and $1.5 million/QALY, all exceeding the threshold of three times GDP per capita. The alternative strategies were not cost-effective. However, if vaccine prices were reduced to $3.9 for MPV-4, $9.9 for MCV-AC, and $12 for MCV-4, the corresponding strategy would be cost-effective. The current meningococcal vaccination strategy in China could effectively prevent the disease at a low cost, but with limited serogroup coverage. Strategies using MPV-4, MCV-AC, or MCV-4 could increase health benefits at a substantial cost, and might become cost-effective if vaccine prices decrease.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Meningocócicas , Vacunas Meningococicas , Niño , Humanos , Análisis de Costo-Efectividad , Vacunas Conjugadas , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Infecciones Meningocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Meningocócicas/prevención & control , Vacunación , China/epidemiología , Polisacáridos
11.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 73(5): 99-103, 2024 Feb 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38329923

RESUMEN

Meningococcal disease, caused by the bacterium Neisseria meningitidis, is a rare but life-threatening illness that requires prompt antibiotic treatment for patients and antibiotic prophylaxis for their close contacts. Historically, N. meningitidis isolates in the United States have been largely susceptible to the antibiotics recommended for prophylaxis, including ciprofloxacin. Since 2019, however, the number of meningococcal disease cases caused by ciprofloxacin-resistant strains has increased. Antibiotic prophylaxis with ciprofloxacin in areas with ciprofloxacin resistance might result in prophylaxis failure. Health departments should preferentially consider using antibiotics other than ciprofloxacin as prophylaxis for close contacts when both of the following criteria have been met in a local catchment area during a rolling 12-month period: 1) the reporting of two or more invasive meningococcal disease cases caused by ciprofloxacin-resistant strains, and 2) ≥20% of all reported invasive meningococcal disease cases are caused by ciprofloxacin-resistant strains. Other than ciprofloxacin, alternative recommended antibiotic options include rifampin, ceftriaxone, or azithromycin. Ongoing monitoring for antibiotic resistance of meningococcal isolates through surveillance and health care providers' reporting of prophylaxis failures will guide future updates to prophylaxis considerations and recommendations.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Meningocócicas , Neisseria meningitidis , Humanos , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Ceftriaxona/uso terapéutico , Ciprofloxacina/farmacología , Ciprofloxacina/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Meningocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Meningocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Meningocócicas/prevención & control , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
12.
Epidemiol Infect ; 152: e22, 2024 Jan 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38234190

RESUMEN

Little information exists concerning the spatial relationship between invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) cases and Neisseria meningitidis (N. meningitidis) carriage. The aim of this study was to examine whether there is a relationship between IMD and asymptomatic oropharyngeal carriage of meningococci by spatial analysis to identify the distribution and patterns of cases and carriage in South Australia (SA). Carriage data geocoded to participants' residential addresses and meningococcal case notifications using Postal Area (POA) centroids were used to analyse spatial distribution by disease- and non-disease-associated genogroups, as well as overall from 2017 to 2020. The majority of IMD cases were genogroup B with the overall highest incidence of cases reported in infants, young children, and adolescents. We found no clear spatial association between N. meningitidis carriage and IMD cases. However, analyses using carriage and case genogroups showed differences in the spatial distribution between metropolitan and regional areas. Regional areas had a higher rate of IMD cases and carriage prevalence. While no clear relationship between cases and carriage was evident in the spatial analysis, the higher rates of both carriage and disease in regional areas highlight the need to maintain high vaccine coverage outside of the well-resourced metropolitan area.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Meningocócicas , Vacunas Meningococicas , Neisseria meningitidis , Niño , Lactante , Adolescente , Humanos , Preescolar , Portador Sano/epidemiología , Portador Sano/prevención & control , Infecciones Meningocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Meningocócicas/prevención & control , Neisseria meningitidis/genética , Orofaringe , Análisis Espacial
13.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 20(1): 2301186, 2024 Dec 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38173392

RESUMEN

Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is an acute life-threatening infection caused by the gram-negative bacterium, Neisseria meningitidis. Globally, there are approximately half a million cases of IMD each year, with incidence varying across geographical regions. Vaccination has proven to be successful against IMD, as part of controlling outbreaks, and when incorporated into national immunization programs. The South-Eastern Europe Meningococcal Advocacy Group (including representatives from Croatia, the Czech Republic, Greece, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Serbia, Slovenia and Ukraine) was formed in order to discuss the potential challenges of IMD faced in the region. The incidence of IMD across Europe has been relatively low over the past decade; of the countries that came together for the South-Eastern Meningococcal Advocacy Group, the notification rates were lower than the European average for some country. The age distribution of IMD cases was highest in infants and children, and most countries also had a further peak in adolescents and young adults. Across the nine included countries between 2010 and 2020, the largest contributors to IMD were serogroups B and C; however, each individual country had distinct patterns for serogroup distribution. Along with the variations in epidemiology of IMD between the included countries, vaccination policies also differ.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Meningocócicas , Vacunas Meningococicas , Neisseria meningitidis , Niño , Lactante , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Humanos , Infecciones Meningocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Meningocócicas/prevención & control , Infecciones Meningocócicas/microbiología , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , República Checa , Vacunación , Serogrupo
14.
Recenti Prog Med ; 115(2): 90-94, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38291935

RESUMEN

Neisseria meningitidis causes life-threatening invasive diseases, such as sepsis, pneumonia, and meningitis. In Italy, as in many other countries, despite vaccination programs, the misdiagnosis of meningococcal infections and the persistence of vaccination hesitancy and of unvaccinated people can lead to possible epidemics. Following the CARE Guidelines, this case-report describes a young woman presented with fever and a strange rash to the General Practice out-of-hours in the island of Grado (Gorizia - Italy), lately recognized as Neisseria meningitidis infection. After a prompt evaluation, she was referred to a central hospital for correct diagnosis and treatment. Study and management of the case and its close-contacts was also carried out by the Prevention Department to provide prophylaxis. The Italian Ooh service is active every night, weekend and on holidays, representing an aid to limit improper access to the Emergency Department, but especially in rural areas, patients with urgent conditions also mainly go to the Ooh, first or alternatively to reach a hospital equipped with ER. The presented case underlines the fundamental role played by Ooh in the timely identification of a meningococcal infection in a patient presenting with non-neurological symptoms, making the correct referral to the specialist department of the nearest central hospital. It is essential to conduct a detailed medical history, even by telephone, and carry out a visit to evaluate the opportunity for hospital admission, especially to achieve early identification of life-threatening communicable diseases. It is also important that medical training, even after graduation, emphasizes the importance of maintaining awareness and making rapid recognition of the key symptoms of these conditions, although rare.


Asunto(s)
Atención Posterior , Medicina General , Infecciones Meningocócicas , Neisseria meningitidis , Femenino , Humanos , Infecciones Meningocócicas/diagnóstico , Infecciones Meningocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Meningocócicas/prevención & control , Italia/epidemiología
16.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 30(2): 270-278, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38270172

RESUMEN

The rising incidence of invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) caused by Neisseria meningitidis serogroup W in Western Australia, Australia, presents challenges for prevention. We assessed the effects of a quadrivalent meningococcal vaccination program using 2012-2020 IMD notification data. Notification rates peaked at 1.8/100,000 population in 2017; rates among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander populations were 7 times higher than for other populations. Serogroup W disease exhibited atypical manifestations and increased severity. Of 216 cases, 20 IMD-related deaths occurred; most (19/20) were in unvaccinated persons. After the 2017-2018 targeted vaccination program, notification rates decreased from 1.6/100,000 population in 2018 to 0.9/100,000 population in 2019 and continued to decline in 2020. Vaccine effectiveness (in the 1-4 years age group) using the screening method was 93.6% (95% CI 50.1%-99.2%) in 2018 and 92.5% (95% CI 28.2%-99.2%) in 2019. Strategic planning and prompt implementation of targeted vaccination programs effectively reduce IMD.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Meningocócicas , Vacunas Meningococicas , Neisseria meningitidis , Humanos , Australia Occidental/epidemiología , Vacunas Bacterianas , Australia , Infecciones Meningocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Meningocócicas/prevención & control , Vacunación
17.
J Infect ; 88(2): 71-76, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37866792

RESUMEN

This review details recent findings from the Global Meningococcal Initiative's (GMI) recent meeting on the surveillance and control strategies for invasive meningococcal disease in the Middle East. The nature of case reporting and notification varies across the region, with many countries using bacterial meningitis as an IMD case definition in lieu of meningitis and septicaemia. This may overlook a significant burden associated with IMD leading to underreporting or misreporting of the disease. Based on these current definitions, IMD reported incidence remains low across the region, with historical outbreaks mainly occurring due to the Hajj and Umrah mass gatherings. The use of case confirmation techniques also varies in Middle Eastern countries. While typical microbiological techniques, such as culture and Gram staining, are widely used for characterisation, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing is utilised in a small number of countries. PCR testing may be inaccessible for several reasons including sample transportation, cost, or a lack of laboratory expertise. These barriers, not exclusive to PCR use, may impact surveillance systems more broadly. Another concern throughout the region is potentially widespread ciprofloxacin resistance since its use for chemoprophylaxis remains high in many countries.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Meningocócicas , Vacunas Meningococicas , Neisseria meningitidis , Humanos , Infecciones Meningocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Meningocócicas/prevención & control , Infecciones Meningocócicas/microbiología , Neisseria meningitidis/genética , Medio Oriente/epidemiología , Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control , Incidencia , Serogrupo
18.
Curr Opin Infect Dis ; 37(1): 63-69, 2024 Feb 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38050729

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: While effective vaccines to prevent invasive infections by Neisseria meningitidis have been deployed around the world, development of a vaccine to prevent Neisseria gonorrhoeae has lagged. After multiple failed vaccine candidates, vaccine development for N. gonorrhoeae is showing promise for the first time in several decades. This review highlights recent progress in the field. RECENT FINDINGS: Vaccines containing outer-membrane vesicles (OMV) have been used to manage outbreaks of the serogroup B N. meningitidis in a number of countries. Epidemiologic studies indicate these vaccination campaigns were associated with reductions in reported N. gonorrhoeae infections. Recently, a serogroup B N. meningitidis vaccine containing both recombinant antigens and OMV has been licensed through much of the world. Epidemiologic studies also demonstrate associations between 4CMenB immunization and reduced N. gonorrhoeae infections. Additionally, mathematical modeling studies have begun to identify potential strategies for vaccine deployment to maximize reduction of infections. SUMMARY: After several decades with little progress towards an effective gonococcal vaccine, large observational studies have provided evidence that a new generation of group B N. meningitidis vaccines containing OMV have serendipitously restarted the field. Ongoing clinical trials will soon provide definitive evidence regarding the efficacy of these vaccines in preventing N. gonorrhoeae infection.


Asunto(s)
Gonorrea , Infecciones Meningocócicas , Vacunas Meningococicas , Neisseria meningitidis , Humanos , Infecciones Meningocócicas/prevención & control , Vacunas Bacterianas , Neisseria gonorrhoeae , Gonorrea/prevención & control
20.
HIV Med ; 25(3): 370-380, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38013594

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: People living with HIV have an increased risk of meningococcal disease. The Propositive trial evaluated co-administration of two doses of a four-component recombinant protein-based MenB vaccine (4CMenB) and a quadrivalent conjugate polysaccharide MenACWY vaccine (MenACWY-CRM197) given 1 month apart in people with HIV. The follow-up trial assessed the immunogenicity of these vaccines at 1.5 and 2.5 years after primary vaccination. METHODS: Participants who completed the parent Propositive trial were invited to the follow-up study. Immunogenicity analysis was performed at 18 and 30 months after primary vaccination. Primary outcome measures were serum bactericidal antibody (SBA) geometric mean titres (GMTs) against three MenB reference strains and the proportion of participants maintaining a protective SBA titre of ≥4 at 18 and 30 months. Secondary outcome measures were SBA GMTs against MenA, C, W, and Y serogroups and the proportion of participants maintaining a protective SBA titre of ≥8 at 18 and 30 months. The trial is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT042394300). RESULTS: A total of 40 participants aged 22-47 years were enrolled. Geometric mean titres waned by 18 and 30 months but remained higher than pre-vaccination for all MenB strains and MenA, C, W, and Y. In total, 75%-85% of participants retained protective SBA titres by 30 months against individual MenB strains, whereas 68.8% of patients retained protective antibody titres against all three MenB strains. Antibodies against MenC waned more rapidly than did those against MenA, W, and Y. The proportion of participants with protective titres against MenC at 30 months was also lower (46.9%) than that with protective titres against MenA (87.5%), W (78.1%), and Y (87.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Immune responses against MenB in our cohort of people living with HIV at 2.5 years of follow-up were reassuring, with 68.8% of participants retaining protection against all three reference strains. However, responses against MenC were lower than those against MenA, W, and Y serogroups.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH , Infecciones Meningocócicas , Vacunas Meningococicas , Humanos , Vacunas Meningococicas/efectos adversos , Infecciones Meningocócicas/prevención & control , Infecciones Meningocócicas/inducido químicamente , Estudios de Seguimiento , Anticuerpos Antibacterianos , Inmunidad , Vacunas Conjugadas
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...