Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 59
Filtrar
1.
J Hosp Infect ; 110: 7-14, 2021 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33428999

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a threat to global public health. Infections with resistant organisms are more challenging to treat, often delay patient recovery and can increase morbidity and mortality. Healthcare costs associated with treating patients with AMR organisms are poorly described. In particular, data for specific organisms, such as those harbouring carbapenem resistance, are lacking. METHODS: This was a retrospective, matched (1:1), single-centre, cohort study at a Central London hospital, comparing costs and resource use of 442 adult inpatients infected with either carbapenem-sensitive (CSO) or carbapenem-resistant organisms (CRO) over a two-year period. Resource use and micro-costing data were obtained from the hospital Patient, Education and Research Costing System (PERCS), and included both direct and indirect costs. RESULTS: Overall, the median healthcare-related cost of treating a patient with a CRO was more than double (£49,537 vs £19,299) that of treating a patient with a CSO. There were statistically significant increases in expenditure across 21 of 44 measured parameters including critical care costs, which accounted for the greatest proportion of overall costs in both groups. Infections were predominantly of the respiratory tract (41%) and caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (76%). CONCLUSIONS: Infection with CROs increases healthcare expenditure significantly. Many of the costs, including patient support, portering and catering, have been underappreciated in previous work. We additionally note that patients infected with CROs have longer hospital stays, and increased theatre operating times compared with patients infected with CSOs.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Carbapenémicos , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/terapia , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Adulto , Atención a la Salud , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/economía , Hospitalización , Humanos , Pacientes Internos , Londres , Estudios Retrospectivos
2.
PLoS One ; 15(2): e0229393, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32084236

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to describe the clinical and economic burden attributable to carbapenem-nonsusceptible (C-NS) respiratory infections. METHODS: This retrospective matched cohort study assessed clinical and economic outcomes of adult patients (aged ≥18 years) who were admitted to one of 78 acute care hospitals in the United States with nonduplicate C-NS and carbapenem-susceptible (C-S) isolates from a respiratory source. A subset analysis of patients with principal diagnosis codes denoting bacterial pneumonia or other diagnoses was also conducted. Isolates were classified as community- or hospital-onset based on collection time. A generalized linear mixed model method was used to estimate the attributable burden for mortality, 30-day readmission, length of stay (LOS), cost, and net gain/loss (payment minus cost) using propensity score-matched C-NS versus C-S cohorts. RESULTS: For C-NS cases, mortality (25.7%), LOS (29.4 days), and costs ($81,574) were highest in the other principal diagnosis, hospital-onset subgroup; readmissions (19.4%) and net loss (-$9522) were greatest in the bacterial pneumonia, hospital-onset subgroup. Mortality and readmissions were not significantly higher for C-NS cases in any propensity score-matched subgroup. Significant C-NS-attributable burden was found for both other principal diagnosis subgroups for LOS (hospital-onset: 3.7 days, P = 0.006; community-onset: 1.5 days, P<0.001) and cost (hospital-onset: $12,777, P<0.01; community-onset: $2681, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Increased LOS and cost burden were observed in propensity score-matched patients with C-NS compared with C-S respiratory infections; the C-NS-attributable burden was significant only for patients with other principal diagnoses.


Asunto(s)
Carbapenémicos/farmacología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/economía , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/mortalidad , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/economía , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/mortalidad , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Bacterias Gramnegativas/efectos de los fármacos , Bacterias Gramnegativas/crecimiento & desarrollo , Bacterias Gramnegativas/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/microbiología , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/microbiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Adulto Joven
3.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31417673

RESUMEN

Background: Antibiotic resistance (ABR) is one of the biggest threats to global health. Infections by ESKAPE (Enterococcus, S. aureus, K. pneumoniae, A. baumannii, P. aeruginosa, and E. coli) organisms are the leading cause of healthcare-acquired infections worldwide. ABR in ESKAPE organisms is usually associated with significant higher morbidity, mortality, as well as economic burden. Directing attention towards the ESKAPE organisms can help us to better combat the wide challenge of ABR, especially multi-drug resistance (MDR). Objective: This study aims to systematically review and evaluate the evidence of the economic consequences of ABR or MDR ESKAPE organisms compared with susceptible cases or control patients without infection/colonization in order to determine the impact of ABR on economic burden. Methods: Both English-language databases and Chinese-language databases up to 16 January, 2019 were searched to identify relevant studies assessing the economic burden of ABR. Studies reported hospital costs (charges) or antibiotic cost during the entire hospitalization and during the period before/after culture among patients with ABR or MDR ESKAPE organisms were included. The costs were converted into 2015 United States Dollars. Disagreements were resolved by a third reviewer. Results: Of 13,693 studies identified, 83 eligible studies were included in our review. The most studied organism was S. aureus, followed by Enterococcus, A. baumannii, E. coli, E. coli or/and K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa, and K. pneumoniae. There were 71 studies on total hospital cost or charge, 12 on antibiotic cost, 11 on hospital cost or charge after culture, 4 on ICU cost, 2 on hospital cost or charge before culture, and 2 on total direct and indirect cost. In general, ABR or MDR ESKAPE organisms are significantly associated with higher economic burden than those with susceptible organisms or those without infection or colonization. Nonetheless, there were no differences in a few studies between the two groups on total hospital cost or charge (16 studies), antibiotic cost (one study), hospital cost before culture (one study), hospital cost after culture (one study). Even, one reported that costs associated with MSSA infection were higher than the costs for similar MRSA cases. Conclusions: ABR in ESKAPE organisms is not always, but usually, associated with significantly higher economic burden. The results without significant differences may lack statistical power to detect a significant association. In addition, study design which controls for severity of illness and same empirical antibiotic therapy in the two groups would be expected to bias the study towards a similar, even negative result. The review also highlights key areas where further research is needed.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/economía , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/tratamiento farmacológico , Acinetobacter baumannii/efectos de los fármacos , Enterococcus/efectos de los fármacos , Escherichia coli/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/economía , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/economía , Costos de Hospital , Humanos , Klebsiella pneumoniae/efectos de los fármacos , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efectos de los fármacos , Staphylococcus aureus/efectos de los fármacos
4.
World Neurosurg ; 128: e31-e37, 2019 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30928594

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: External ventricular drain (EVD) infections are a significant cause of morbidity among neurosurgical patients and have been correlated with increased length of hospital stay and longer requirements for intensive care. To date, no studies have examined the financial impact of EVD infections. METHODS: Patients who underwent EVD placement between December 2010 and January 2016 were included in the study. Clinical records were retrospectively reviewed and health care cost data were obtained from the hospital's finance department. Clinical information included patient demographics, details from the hospital course, and outcomes. Total costs, direct/indirect, and fixed/variable costs were analyzed for every patient. RESULTS: Over the 5-year study period, 246 EVDs were placed in 243 patients with an overall infection rate of 9.9% (N = 24). The median EVD duration for infected versus noninfected patients was 19 and 9 days, respectively (P < 0.0001). Median length of intensive care unit stay also was increased for patients with EVD infection (30 days vs. 13 days, P < 0.0001). Total health care costs were significantly greater for infected patients (US$ 168,692 vs. US$ 83,919, P < 0.0001). This trend was comparable for all other cost subtypes, including fixed-direct costs, fixed-indirect costs, variable direct costs, and variable-indirect costs. CONCLUSIONS: EVD infection has a substantial effect on clinical morbidity and healthcare costs. These results demonstrate the imperative need to improve EVD infection prevention, particularly in the setting of a value-based health care system.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/economía , Hemorragia Cerebral/cirugía , Ventriculitis Cerebral/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/economía , Hemorragia Subaracnoidea/cirugía , Ventriculostomía , Adulto , Anciano , Drenaje , Femenino , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/economía , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/economía , Humanos , Infecciones por Klebsiella/economía , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/economía , Estados Unidos
5.
Chest ; 155(6): 1119-1130, 2019 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30685333

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Carbapenem resistance is a growing concern. Applying a novel algorithm, we examined epidemiology and outcomes of carbapenem resistance among gram-negative pathogens in hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). METHODS: In a retrospective cohort design within the Premier Research database (2009-2016), all hospitalized adult patients with a gram-negative organism in a respiratory or blood culture specimen who fit criteria for HAP/VAP based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification, codes were included in the study. RESULTS: Among 8,969 patients with HAP/VAP, 1,059 isolates (11.8%) were carbapenem-resistant (CR) organisms. Patients with CR organisms were more likely female (41.4% vs 33.2%; P < .001) and medical admissions (33.8% vs 27.4%, P < .001) than those with carbapenem-susceptible (CS) organisms. Patients with carbapenem resistance had higher comorbidity burden than those with carbapenem susceptibility (median [interquartile range] Charlson Comorbidity Index score, 3 [1-4] vs 2 [1-4]; P < .001). Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most common gram-negative pathogen overall (24.9%) and among CS organisms (23.5%), and was second to Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (44.0%) among CR organisms (35.3%). Acinetobacter baumannii accounted for 11.8% of CR organisms and 2.5% of CS organisms (P < .001). Patients with carbapenem resistance were more likely than those with carbapenem susceptibility to receive inappropriate empiric therapy (25.8% vs 10.0%; P < .001). Carbapenem resistance did not affect adjusted mortality (22.9% CR vs 21.6% CS) or postinfection length of stay (except among survivors of VAP), but it was associated with excess costs ($8,921; 95% CI, 3,864-13,977). CONCLUSIONS: Using administrative data, our novel algorithm identified patients with pneumonia at high risk for death, consistent with HAP/VAP. Among them, carbapenem resistance occurred in 12% of all cases and was associated with substantial excess in hospital costs.


Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Carbapenémicos/farmacología , Bacterias Gramnegativas , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador , Resistencia betalactámica , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Femenino , Bacterias Gramnegativas/efectos de los fármacos , Bacterias Gramnegativas/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/economía , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/mortalidad , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica/economía , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica/microbiología , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica/mortalidad , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud/métodos , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/economía , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/microbiología , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
6.
J Bone Joint Surg Am ; 101(1): 14-24, 2019 Jan 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30601412

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total knee arthroplasty is a growing concern, as the demand for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) expands annually. Although 2-stage revision is considered the gold standard in management, there is substantial morbidity and mortality associated with this strategy. One-stage revision is associated with lower mortality rates and better quality of life, and there has been increased interest in utilizing the 1-stage strategy. However, surgeons are faced with a difficult decision regarding which strategy to use to treat these infections, considering uncertainty with respect to eradication of infection, quality of life, and societal costs with each strategy. The purpose of the current study was to use decision analysis to determine the optimal decision for the management of PJI following TKA. METHODS: An expected-value decision tree was constructed to estimate the quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and costs associated with 1-stage and 2-stage revision. Two decision trees were created: Decision Tree 1 was constructed for all pathogens, and Decision Tree 2 was constructed solely for difficult-to-treat infections, including methicillin-resistant infections. Values for parameters in the decision model, such as mortality rate, reinfection rate, and need for additional surgeries, were derived from the literature. Medical costs were derived from Medicare data. Sensitivity analysis determined which parameters in the decision model had the most influence on the optimal strategy. RESULTS: In both decision trees, the 1-stage strategy produced greater health utility while also being more cost-effective. In the Monte Carlo simulation for Decision Trees 1 and 2, 1-stage was the dominant strategy in about 85% and 69% of the trials, respectively. Sensitivity analysis showed that the reinfection and 1-year mortality rates were the most sensitive parameters influencing the optimal decision. CONCLUSIONS: Despite 2-stage revision being considered the current gold standard for infection eradication in patients with PJI following TKA, the optimal decision that produced the highest quality of life was 1-stage revision. These results should be considered in shared decision-making with patients who experience PJI following TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic and Decision Analysis Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/métodos , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas/métodos , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/cirugía , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/cirugía , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/cirugía , Reoperación/métodos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/economía , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/mortalidad , Árboles de Decisión , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/economía , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/mortalidad , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/economía , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/mortalidad , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Prótesis de la Rodilla/efectos adversos , Cadenas de Markov , Medicare , Método de Montecarlo , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/economía , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/mortalidad , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Reoperación/economía , Reoperación/mortalidad , Estados Unidos
7.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 18(1): 737, 2018 Sep 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30257671

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic resistance is a challenge in the management of infectious diseases and can cause substantial cost. Even without the onset of infection, measures must be taken, as patients colonized with multi-drug resistant (MDR) pathogens may transmit the pathogen. We aim to quantify the cost of community-acquired MDR colonizations using routine data from a German teaching hospital. METHODS: All 2006 cases of documented MDR colonization at hospital admission recorded from 2011 to 2014 are matched to 7917 unexposed controls with the same primary diagnosis. Cases with an onset MDR infection are excluded from the analysis. Routine data on costs per case is analysed for three groups of MDR bacteria: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant enterococcus (VRE), and multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GN). Multivariate analyses are conducted to adjust for potential confounders. RESULTS: After controlling for main diagnosis group, age, sex, and Charlson Comorbidity Index, MDR colonization is associated with substantial additional costs from the healthcare perspective (€1480.9, 95%CI €1286.4-€1675.5). Heterogeneity between pathogens remains. Colonization with MDR-GN leads to the largest cost increase (€1966.0, 95%CI €1634.6-€2297.4), followed by MRSA with €1651.3 (95%CI €1279.1-€2023.6), and VRE with €879.2 (95%CI €604.1-€1154.2). At the same time, MDR-GN is associated with additional reimbursements of €887.8 (95%CI €722.1-€1053.6), i.e. costs associated with MDR-colonization exceed reimbursement. CONCLUSIONS: Even without the onset of invasive infection, documented MDR-colonization at hospital admission is associated with increased hospital costs, which are not fully covered within the German DRG-based hospital payment system.


Asunto(s)
Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Costos de Hospital , Hospitalización/economía , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Enterococcus , Femenino , Alemania , Bacterias Gramnegativas , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/economía , Hospitales de Enseñanza/economía , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/economía
8.
Int J Clin Pharm ; 40(5): 1051-1058, 2018 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30117080

RESUMEN

Background Gram negative pathogens are increasingly resistant to commonly used first line antibiotics and colistin is in most cases the only medicine available. There is very limited information available comparing the effectiveness and costs of low versus high dose colistin with studies showing efficacy with both doses and with variable levels of adverse effects. The absence of a definite dosing strategy makes a model to compare low dose and high dose colistin invaluable in making decisions regarding the appropriate use of colistin. Objective This study was designed to evaluate the cost effectiveness of low versus high dose colistin in the treatment of Pneumonia caused by colistin-only sensitive gram negative bacteria from the perspective of a tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia. Setting 300-bed tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia. Method A retrospective review was conducted to compare the costs and outcomes of treatment of pneumonia with low versus high dose colistin. The model followed an average patient from initiation of treatment until clinical cure or failure. Main outcome measures The main outcomes were cure, nephrotoxicity, total direct costs per episode, cost per additional cure and cost per nephrotoxicity avoided. Results There was no significant difference between high and low dose colistin with regards to clinical cure (30% vs. 21%; p = 0.292). Significantly more patients experienced nephrotoxicity with high versus low dose colistin (30% vs. 8%; p = 0.004). With low dose colistin the incremental costs per nephrotoxicity avoided was SAR-3056.28. One-way sensitivity analyses did not change the overall results. Conclusion Low dose was not inferior to high dose colistin in terms of clinical cure and had a lower incidence of nephrotoxicity resulting in significant cost avoidance.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/economía , Colistina/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio/métodos , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple/efectos de los fármacos , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica/economía , Neumonía Bacteriana/economía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas/métodos , Colistina/farmacología , Colistina/uso terapéutico , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/economía , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/epidemiología , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neumonía Bacteriana/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía Bacteriana/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Arabia Saudita/epidemiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30150480

RESUMEN

Few studies have estimated the excess inpatient costs due to nosocomial cultures of Gram-negative bacteria (GNB), and those that do are often subject to time-dependent bias. Our objective was to generate estimates of the attributable costs of the underlying infections associated with nosocomial cultures by using a unique inpatient cost data set from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs that allowed us to reduce time-dependent bias. Our study included data from inpatient admissions between 1 October 2007 and 30 November 2010. Nosocomial GNB-positive cultures were defined as clinical cultures positive for Acinetobacter, Pseudomonas, or Enterobacteriaceae between 48 h after admission and discharge. Positive cultures were further classified by site and level of resistance. We conducted analyses using both a conventional approach and an approach aimed at reducing the impact of time-dependent bias. In both instances, we used multivariable generalized linear models to compare the inpatient costs and length of stay for patients with and without a nosocomial GNB culture. Of the 404,652 patients included in the conventional analysis, 12,356 had a nosocomial GNB-positive culture. The excess costs of nosocomial GNB-positive cultures were significant, regardless of specific pathogen, site, or resistance level. Estimates generated using the conventional analysis approach were 32.0% to 131.2% greater than those generated using the approach to reduce time-dependent bias. These results are important because they underscore the large financial burden attributable to these infections and provide a baseline that can be used to assess the impact of improvements in infection control.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/economía , Bacterias Gramnegativas/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/economía , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Anciano , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Cohortes , Infección Hospitalaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana/efectos de los fármacos , Femenino , Bacterias Gramnegativas/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Hospitales , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
10.
N Z Med J ; 131(1475): 27-34, 2018 05 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29771899

RESUMEN

AIM: To determine the excess cost and hospitalisation associated with surgical site infections (SSI) following spinal operations in a New Zealand setting. METHODS: We identified inpatients treated for deep SSI following primary or revision spinal surgery at a regional tertiary spinal centre between 2009 and 2016. Excess cost and excess length of stay (LOS) were calculated via a clinical costing system using procedure-matched controls. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were identified. Twenty-five had metalware following spinal fusion surgery, while three had non-instrumented decompression and/or discectomy. Five were diagnosed during their index hospitalisation and 23 (82%) were re-admitted. The average excess SSI cost was NZ$51,434 (range $1,398-$262,206.16) and LOS 37.1 days (range 7-275 days). Infections following metalware procedures had a greater excess cost (average $56,258.90 vs. $11,228.61) and LOS (average 40.4 days vs. 9.7 days) than procedures without metalware. CONCLUSION: The costs associated with spinal SSI are significant and comparable to a previous New Zealand study of hip and knee prosthesis SSI. More awareness of the high costs involved should encourage research and implementation of infection prevention strategies.


Asunto(s)
Descompresión Quirúrgica/economía , Discectomía/economía , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Fusión Vertebral/economía , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/economía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/economía , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/terapia , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/economía , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nueva Zelanda , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/terapia , Adulto Joven
11.
BMJ Open ; 8(4): e020251, 2018 04 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29654026

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) impose a high burden on healthcare systems and are a frequent cause of hospitalisation. The aims of this paper are to estimate the cost per episode of patients hospitalised due to cUTI and to explore the factors associated with cUTI-related healthcare costs in eight countries with high prevalence of multidrug resistance (MDR). DESIGN: This is a multinational observational, retrospective study. The mean cost per episode was computed by multiplying the volume of healthcare use for each patient by the unit cost of each item of care and summing across all components. Costs were measured from the hospital perspective. Patient-level regression analyses were used to identify the factors explaining variation in cUTI-related costs. SETTING: The study was conducted in 20 hospitals in eight countries with high prevalence of multidrug resistant Gram-negative bacteria (Bulgaria, Greece, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Romania, Spain and Turkey). PARTICIPANTS: Data were obtained from 644 episodes of patients hospitalised due to cUTI. RESULTS: The mean cost per case was €5700, with considerable variation between countries (largest value €7740 in Turkey; lowest value €4028 in Israel), mainly due to differences in length of hospital stay. Factors associated with higher costs per patient were: type of admission, infection source, infection severity, the Charlson comorbidity index and presence of MDR. CONCLUSIONS: The mean cost per hospitalised case of cUTI was substantial and varied significantly between countries. A better knowledge of the reasons for variations in length of stays could facilitate a better standardised quality of care for patients with cUTI and allow a more efficient allocation of healthcare resources. Urgent admissions, infections due to an indwelling urinary catheterisation, resulting in septic shock or severe sepsis, in patients with comorbidities and presenting MDR were related to a higher cost.


Asunto(s)
Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Bacterias Gramnegativas/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/economía , Infecciones Urinarias/economía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Antibacterianos/economía , Bulgaria , Femenino , Grecia , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Hospitalización/economía , Humanos , Hungría , Israel , Italia , Imanes , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Rumanía , España , Turquía , Infecciones Urinarias/microbiología
12.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 51(4): 601-607, 2018 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29277527

RESUMEN

The financial burden of antibiotic resistance is a serious concern worldwide. The aim of this study was to describe the excess costs associated with pneumonia, bacteraemia, surgical site infections and intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli in Medellín, Colombia, an endemic region for carbapenem resistance. A cohort study was conducted in a third-level hospital from 2014-2015. All patients with carbapenem-resistant and carbapenem-susceptible Gram-negative bacterial infections were included. Pharmaceutical, medical and surgical direct costs were described from the health system perspective. Excess costs were estimated from generalised linear models with gamma distribution and adjusted for variables that could affect the cost difference. A total of 218 patients were enrolled, 48 (22.0%) of whom were infected with carbapenem-resistant bacteria. IAIs were the most frequent. The adjusted total excess cost was US$3966 [95% confidence interval (CI) US$1684-6249], with a significantly higher cost for antibiotics, followed by hospital stay, laboratory tests and interconsultation. The highest excess cost was attributed mainly to the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics (US$1827, 95% CI US$1005-2648), followed by length of hospital stay (US$1015, 95% CI US$163-1867). The results of this study highlight the importance of designing antimicrobial stewardship programmes and infection control strategies in endemic regions to reduce the financial threat of antimicrobial resistance to health systems.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia/economía , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Infecciones Intraabdominales/economía , Neumonía Bacteriana/economía , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/economía , Anciano , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Carbapenémicos/uso terapéutico , Colombia , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Enterobacter cloacae/efectos de los fármacos , Femenino , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/microbiología , Humanos , Infecciones Intraabdominales/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Intraabdominales/microbiología , Klebsiella pneumoniae/efectos de los fármacos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neumonía Bacteriana/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía Bacteriana/microbiología , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efectos de los fármacos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/tratamiento farmacológico , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/microbiología
13.
Prev Vet Med ; 146: 86-93, 2017 Oct 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28992932

RESUMEN

In 2008, virulent footrot was detected in sheep in south-west Norway. Footrot is caused by Dichelobacter nodosus, and the outbreak was linked to live sheep imported from Denmark in 2005. A large-scale program for eradicating the disease was implemented as a joint industry and governmental driven eradication project in the years 2008-2014, and continued with surveillance and control measures by the Norwegian Food Safety Authority from 2015. The cost of the eradication program including surveillance and control measures until 2032 was assumed to reach approximately €10.8 million (NOK 90 million). A financial cost-benefit analysis, comparing costs in the eradication program with costs in two simulated scenarios, was carried out. In the scenarios, designated ModerateSpread (baseline) and SlowSpread, it was assumed that the sheep farmers would undertake some voluntary measures on their own that would slow the spread of the disease. The program obtained a positive NPV after approximately 12 years. In a stochastic analysis, the probabilities of a positive NPV were estimated to 1.000 and to 0.648 after 15 years and to 0.378 and 0.016 after ten years, for the ModerateSpread and SlowSpread scenarios respectively. A rapid start-up of the program soon after the detection of the disease was considered crucial for the economic success as the disease would have become more widespread and probably raised the costs considerably at a later start-up.


Asunto(s)
Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/economía , Panadizo Interdigital/economía , Panadizo Interdigital/prevención & control , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/veterinaria , Enfermedades de las Ovejas/economía , Enfermedades de las Ovejas/prevención & control , Animales , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/métodos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Dinamarca , Dichelobacter nodosus/aislamiento & purificación , Brotes de Enfermedades/economía , Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control , Panadizo Interdigital/transmisión , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/economía , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/prevención & control , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/transmisión , Seguro/economía , Modelos Econométricos , Noruega , Vigilancia de Guardia/veterinaria , Ovinos , Enfermedades de las Ovejas/transmisión , Procesos Estocásticos
14.
Pediatr Blood Cancer ; 64(10)2017 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28332765

RESUMEN

Optimal management of infectious complication is the biggest challenge in children receiving chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We have analyzed the data of children undergoing AML induction chemotherapy at our center from 2002 to 2016 and found that Gram-negative infections are more predominant when compared to the published literature. There also has been a surge in multidrug-resistant (MDR) infections over the last 4 years, which has increased the need for supportive care and escalated the cost of care. We have introduced certain novel methods to combat MDR sepsis and decrease mortality rates.


Asunto(s)
Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Femenino , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/economía , Humanos , India , Lactante , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/tratamiento farmacológico , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/economía , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/microbiología , Masculino
15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27993852

RESUMEN

The clinical and economic impacts of bloodstream infections (BSI) due to multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacteria are incompletely understood. From 2009 to 2015, all adult inpatients with Gram-negative BSI at our institution were prospectively enrolled. MDR status was defined as resistance to ≥3 antibiotic classes. Clinical outcomes and inpatient costs associated with the MDR phenotype were identified. Among 891 unique patients with Gram-negative BSI, 292 (33%) were infected with MDR bacteria. In an adjusted analysis, only history of Gram-negative infection was associated with MDR BSI versus non-MDR BSI (odds ratio, 1.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19 to 2.16; P = 0.002). Patients with MDR BSI had increased BSI recurrence (1.7% [5/292] versus 0.2% [1/599]; P = 0.02) and longer hospital stay (median, 10.0 versus 8.0 days; P = 0.0005). Unadjusted rates of in-hospital mortality did not significantly differ between MDR (26.4% [77/292]) and non-MDR (21.7% [130/599]) groups (P = 0.12). Unadjusted mean costs were 1.62 times higher in MDR than in non-MDR BSI ($59,266 versus $36,452; P = 0.003). This finding persisted after adjustment for patient factors and appropriate empirical antibiotic therapy (means ratio, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.36; P = 0.01). Adjusted analysis of patient subpopulations revealed that the increased cost of MDR BSI occurred primarily among patients with hospital-acquired infections (MDR means ratio, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.82; P = 0.008). MDR Gram-negative BSI are associated with recurrent BSI, longer hospital stays, and increased mean inpatient costs. MDR BSI in patients with hospital-acquired infections primarily account for the increased cost.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia/economía , Infección Hospitalaria/economía , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Antibacterianos/economía , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Bacteriemia/mortalidad , Infección Hospitalaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Infección Hospitalaria/mortalidad , Femenino , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/microbiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/mortalidad , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , North Carolina , Estudios Prospectivos , Análisis de Supervivencia
16.
Przegl Epidemiol ; 69(3): 523-8, 633-6, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés, Polaco | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26519850

RESUMEN

UNLABELLED: The Hospital Infection Control Team (HICT) of Dr Jan Biziel University Hospital No 2 in Bydgoszcz developed and implemented the principles of a rational antibiotic therapy in 2008. A behavior algorithm has worked since 01.10.2008. Implementation of the principles of a rational antibiotic therapy was part of the hospital antibiotic policy. THE AIM OF THE STUDY: is to evaluate either introductory principles of the rational antibiotic therapy, after five-year experience lived up to expectations in the range specified by the authors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Hospital microbiological maps, comparisons of antibiotic cost, specification of microbiological tests made before and after introduction of the principles of a rational antibiotic therapy have been analyzed. Annual antibiotic consumption has been counted according to the defined daily dose (DDD) index created by the WHO. RESULTS: After 6 years of implementation of the rational antibiotic therapy principles, the decrease in number of isolated strains which are resistant to Klebsiella pneumoniae ESBL and Acinetobacter baumanii (resistant to carbapenems) has been indicated. The number of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates has increased approximately three times, and the number of resistant isolates to carbapenem has grown six times. The cost of antibiotics has been gradually decreased in 2012 in order to represent 9,66% of all drug budget (without drug programs). Detailed analysis of antibiotic consumption has showed that after the implementation of rational antibiotic therapy principles the consumption of meropenem has increased twice in comparison to the all drugs. The number of microbiological tests grew from 0,20 to 0,29 per one patient, which means material to microbiological tests has been taken from every third patient. Annual DDD index calculated on 100 person-days has been reduced from 59,552 in 2007 to 39,90 in 2009, and it is 47,88 in 2013. The principles of rational antibiotic therapy in comparison with the other elements of antibiotic policy in hospital have caused positive changes in antibiotic ordinance. CONCLUSIONS: 1. It is required to adhere to the principles of a rational antibiotic therapy by medical staff mainly on the administrative restriction of access to antibiotics. 2. Monitoring changes in drug resistance of hospital flora is an essential element of the principles of a rational antibiotic therapy modification.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Control de Infecciones/organización & administración , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/organización & administración , Antibacterianos/economía , Farmacorresistencia Microbiana , Economía Hospitalaria/organización & administración , Eficiencia Organizacional , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/economía , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/epidemiología , Humanos , Polonia , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos
17.
Expert Opin Pharmacother ; 16(2): 159-77, 2015 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25496207

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Antimicrobial resistance is a well-recognized global threat; thus, the development of strong infection control policies coupled with antimicrobial stewardship strategies and new therapies is required to reverse this process. In its 2013 report on antimicrobial resistance, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention focused on this problem while presenting estimated annual rates of infections with antimicrobial-resistant organisms and their related mortality rates. Whereas some resistant pathogens were considered less threatening, others such as carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae were associated with higher mortality rates owing to limited treatment options. AREAS COVERED: An overview of the most common antimicrobial-resistant pathogens, focusing on risk factors for acquisition, clinical and economic outcomes, as well as current treatment options. Strategies to optimize antimicrobial therapy with currently available agents, in addition to newly developed antimicrobials are also discussed. EXPERT OPINION: The emergence of pathogens with a variety of resistance mechanisms has intensified the challenges associated with infection control and treatment strategies. Therefore, prudent use of currently available antimicrobial agents, as well as implementing measures to limit spread of resistance is paramount. Although several new antimicrobials have been recently approved or are in the pipeline showing promise in the battle against resistance, the appropriate use of these agents is required as the true benefits of these treatments are to be recognized in the clinical care setting.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Bacterianas/tratamiento farmacológico , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Antibacterianos/economía , Infecciones Bacterianas/economía , Infecciones Bacterianas/microbiología , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/economía , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/microbiología , Infección Hospitalaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Infección Hospitalaria/economía , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/economía , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/microbiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/economía , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/microbiología , Humanos
18.
Acta Med Indones ; 46(3): 209-16, 2014 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25348183

RESUMEN

AIM: to obtain formulation of an effective and efficient strategy to overcome blood stream infection (BSI). METHODS: operational research design with qualitative and quantitative approach. The study was divided into two stages. Stage I was an operational research with problem solving approach using qualitative and quantitative method. Stage II was performed using quantitative method, a form of an interventional study on strategy implementation, which was previously established in stage I. The effective and efficient strategy for the prevention and control of infection in neonatal unit Cipto Mangunkusumo (CM) Hospital was established using Balanced Scorecard (BSC) approach, which involved several related processes. RESULTS: the BSC strategy was proven to be effective and efficient in substantially reducing BSI from 52.31°/oo to 1.36°/oo in neonates with birth weight (BW) 1000-1499 g (p=0.025), and from 29.96°/oo to 1.66°/oo in BW 1500-1999 g (p=0.05). Gram-negative bacteria still predominated as the main cause of BSI in CMH Neonatal Unit. So far, the sources of the microorganisms were thought to be from the environment of treatment unit (tap water filter and humidifying water in the incubator). Significant reduction was also found in neonatal mortality rate weighing 1000-1499 g at birth, length of stay, hospitalization costs, and improved customer satisfaction. CONCLUSION: effective and efficient infection prevention and control using BSC approach could significantly reduce the rate of BSI. This approach may be applied for adult patients in intensive care unit with a wide range of adjustment.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia/prevención & control , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/prevención & control , Recién Nacido de Bajo Peso , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Algoritmos , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Bacteriemia/economía , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Infección Hospitalaria/diagnóstico , Infección Hospitalaria/economía , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/economía , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/microbiología , Costos de Hospital , Humanos , Indonesia , Recién Nacido , Control de Infecciones/economía , Control de Infecciones/normas , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Satisfacción del Paciente , Investigación Cualitativa , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/economía
19.
Int J Clin Pharm ; 36(5): 995-9, 2014 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25097067

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Medicinal leech therapy is effective in establishing venous outflow in congested flaps and replants. However, its use is also associated with infections, especially from Aeromonas species. To prevent this nosocomial infection, levofloxacin has been established as prophylaxis during leech therapy in our hospital. OBJECTIVES: To study the implementation rate of a guideline, to study the effect of levofloxacin on possible Aeromonas infections, and to evaluate the financial impact of this preventive measure. SETTING: A retrospective analysis on all patients treated with Hirudo medicinalis between July 2007 and March 2011 was performed at the Ghent University Hospital, Belgium. METHOD: A list of patients treated with leeches was retrieved from the pharmacy database. Patient characteristics, date of start and stop of leech therapy were collected. Data on routine diagnostic cultures during leech therapy, date and type of clinical sample, while cultivated micro-organism with antibiotic susceptibility were obtained from the laboratory database. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: percentage implementation rate of a guideline, presence of Aeromonas infections, financial impact of levofloxacin prophylaxis. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients were treated with leeches. Forty-six (90.2 %) patients were treated according the guideline. Fourteen out of 51 patients (27.5 %) were suspected for postoperative wound infections. From them, 60 clinical samples were sent for microbiological analysis. These included exudates (26.7 %), peroperative samples (5.0 %), puncture fluid (1.7 %), blood cultures (3.3 %) or smears from burns (63.3 %). No Aeromonas species were cultivated. Comparison between period before and after implementation of levofloxacin prophylaxis revealed that levofloxacin prevents colonization or infection with Aeromonas species in relation to leech therapy. The direct cost for levofloxacin prophylaxis in the current study was 2,570 euro. Based on data obtained in a previous study, we presume that a minimum cost-saving of 20,500 euro was realised during the current study period by implementation of antimicrobial prophylaxis. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates successful implementation of a guideline for levofloxacin prophylaxis during leech therapy. Following its introduction, no Aeromonas species related to the use of leeches were isolated as compared to 8.5 % in the baseline period.


Asunto(s)
Aeromonas/efectos de los fármacos , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Profilaxis Antibiótica , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/prevención & control , Aplicación de Sanguijuelas/efectos adversos , Levofloxacino/farmacología , Adolescente , Adulto , Antibacterianos/economía , Profilaxis Antibiótica/economía , Profilaxis Antibiótica/estadística & datos numéricos , Niño , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/economía , Adhesión a Directriz/economía , Humanos , Levofloxacino/economía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven
20.
Int J Infect Dis ; 24: 23-9, 2014 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24614137

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Contaminated textiles in hospitals contribute to endogenous, indirect-contact, and aerosol transmission of nosocomial related pathogens. Copper oxide impregnated linens have wide-spectrum antimicrobial, antifungal, and antiviral properties. Our aim was to determine if replacing non-biocidal linens with biocidal copper oxide impregnated linens would reduce the rates of healthcare-associated infections (HAI) in a long-term care ward. METHODS: We compared the rates of HAI in two analogous patient cohorts in a head injury care ward over two 6-month parallel periods before (period A) and after (period B) replacing all the regular non-biocidal linens and personnel uniforms with copper oxide impregnated biocidal products. RESULTS: During period B, in comparison to period A, there was a 24% reduction in the HAI per 1000 hospitalization-days (p<0.05), a 47% reduction in the number of fever days (>38.5°C) per 1000 hospitalization-days (p<0.01), and a 32.8% reduction in total number of days of antibiotic administration per 1000 hospitalization-days (p<0.0001). Accordingly there was saving of approximately 27% in costs of antibiotics, HAI-related treatments, X-rays, disposables, labor, and laundry, expenses during period B. CONCLUSIONS: The use of biocidal copper oxide impregnated textiles in a long-term care ward may significantly reduce HAI, fever, antibiotic consumption, and related treatment costs.


Asunto(s)
Lesiones Encefálicas/rehabilitación , Cobre/farmacología , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Desinfectantes/farmacología , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/prevención & control , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/prevención & control , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antibacterianos/economía , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Ropa de Cama y Ropa Blanca/microbiología , Lesiones Encefálicas/complicaciones , Lesiones Encefálicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Lesiones Encefálicas/patología , Infección Hospitalaria/complicaciones , Infección Hospitalaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Infección Hospitalaria/economía , Femenino , Bacterias Gramnegativas/efectos de los fármacos , Bacterias Gramnegativas/crecimiento & desarrollo , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/complicaciones , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/economía , Bacterias Grampositivas/efectos de los fármacos , Bacterias Grampositivas/crecimiento & desarrollo , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/complicaciones , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/economía , Hospitales , Humanos , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/economía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...