Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 1.699
Filtrar
1.
Parasit Vectors ; 17(1): 211, 2024 May 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38730429

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The health and productivity of dairy goats continue to be impacted by gastrointestinal nematodes (GIN) and lungworms (LW). Eprinomectin (EPN) is frequently selected for treatment because it is generally effective and does not require a milk withdrawal period. However, some factors, such as lactation, can have an impact on EPN pharmacokinetics and potentially its efficacy. To evaluate whether this can alter the efficacy of Eprecis® 2%, an eprinomectin injectable solution, a study was performed in lactating goats using the dose currently registered in cattle, sheep and goats (0.2 mg/kg). METHODS: This study was a blinded, randomized, controlled trial performed according to the VICH guidelines. Eighteen (18) worm-free lactating goats were included and experimentally challenged on day 28 with a mixed culture of infective gastrointestinal and lung nematode larvae (Haemonchus contortus, Trichostrongylus colubriformis, Teladorsagia circumcincta, Dictyocaulus filaria). At D-1, fecal samples were collected to confirm patent infection in all animals. On D0, the goats were randomly allocated into two groups of nine goats; group 1 was treated with Eprecis® 2% at 0.2 mg/kg BW by subcutaneous injection, while group 2 remained untreated. Fecal samples for egg counts were collected from all animals on days 3, 5, 7, 9, 11 and 14. On D14, all goats were killed, and the abomasum, small intestine and lungs were removed, processed and subsampled to record the number and species of worms. RESULTS: The treatment was well tolerated. After treatment, the arithmetic mean FEC decreased in the treated group and remained < 5 EPG until the end of the study, while the arithmetic mean FEC in the control group remained > 849.0 EPG. At D14, goats in the treated group had very limited or zero total worm counts, whereas all animals from the control group had a high worm burden. The measured efficacy was 100.0% against H. contortus and T. colubriformis, 99.9% against T. circumcincta and 98.0% against D. filaria. CONCLUSIONS: Eprinomectin (Eprecis®, 20 mg/ml), administered at the label dose (0.2 mg/kg), is highly effective against gastrointestinal nematodes and lungworms in lactating goats.


Asunto(s)
Heces , Enfermedades de las Cabras , Cabras , Ivermectina , Lactancia , Infecciones por Nematodos , Animales , Ivermectina/análogos & derivados , Ivermectina/administración & dosificación , Ivermectina/farmacocinética , Ivermectina/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades de las Cabras/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades de las Cabras/parasitología , Femenino , Infecciones por Nematodos/veterinaria , Infecciones por Nematodos/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Nematodos/parasitología , Heces/parasitología , Lactancia/efectos de los fármacos , Recuento de Huevos de Parásitos/veterinaria , Inyecciones Subcutáneas/veterinaria , Antihelmínticos/administración & dosificación , Antihelmínticos/uso terapéutico , Antihelmínticos/farmacocinética , Nematodos/efectos de los fármacos , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/veterinaria , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/parasitología , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/tratamiento farmacológico , Pulmón/parasitología
2.
Parasitol Res ; 123(5): 207, 2024 May 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38713234

RESUMEN

Biomarkers are specific molecular, histological, or physiological characteristics of normal or pathogenic biological processes and are promising in the diagnosis of gastrointestinal nematodes (GINs). Although some biomarkers have been validated for infection by Ostertagia sp. in cattle raised in temperate regions, there is a lack of information for tropical regions. The aim of this project was to assess potential biomarkers and validate the most promising. In the first study, 36 bovines (Nelore breed) naturally infected by GINs were distributed into two groups: infected (not treated with anthelmintic) and treated (treated with fenbendazole on days 0, 7, 14, 21, 28, 42, and 56). The variables of interest were live weight, fecal egg count, hemogram, serum biochemical markers, phosphorus, gastrin, and pepsinogen. In the second step, pepsinogen was assessed in cattle of the Nelore breed distributed among three groups: infected (not treated with anthelmintic), MOX (treated with moxidectin), and IVM + BZD (treated with ivermectin + albendazole). In the first study, no difference between groups was found for weight, albumin, hematocrit (corpuscular volume [CV]), erythrocytes, or hemoglobin. Negative correlations were found between pepsinogen and both CV and albumin, and albumin was negatively correlated with the percentage of Haemonchus sp. in the fecal culture. Among the biomarkers, only pepsinogen differentiated treated and infected (beginning with the 28th day of the study). In the second study, a reduction in pepsinogen was found after anthelmintic treatment. Therefore, pepsinogen is a promising biomarker of worms in cattle naturally infected by the genera Haemonchus and Cooperia in tropical areas.


Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores , Enfermedades de los Bovinos , Heces , Infecciones por Nematodos , Clima Tropical , Animales , Bovinos , Enfermedades de los Bovinos/parasitología , Enfermedades de los Bovinos/tratamiento farmacológico , Biomarcadores/sangre , Infecciones por Nematodos/veterinaria , Infecciones por Nematodos/parasitología , Infecciones por Nematodos/tratamiento farmacológico , Heces/parasitología , Recuento de Huevos de Parásitos , Antihelmínticos/uso terapéutico , Nematodos/aislamiento & purificación , Nematodos/clasificación , Nematodos/efectos de los fármacos , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/parasitología , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/veterinaria , Parasitosis Intestinales/veterinaria , Parasitosis Intestinales/parasitología , Fenbendazol/uso terapéutico
3.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 6841, 2024 03 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38514717

RESUMEN

Gastrointestinal nematodes (GINs) are major constraints to health and productivity of small ruminants. Methods of their control relies mainly on anthelmintic drugs; however, the indiscriminate use of these drugs could lead to the development of anthelmintic resistance (AR). This study aimed to investigate the epidemiology of GINs infection, and field evaluation of anthelmintic efficacy in sheep. The epidemiological data were collected using a cross-sectional study design while a farm-based field study design was employed for the evaluation of anthelminthic efficacy. Furthermore, standard parasitological techniques were employed for qualitative and quantitative worm identification. The overall prevalence indicated 50.3%. Six genera of GINs (Haemonchus, Trichostrongylus, Oesophagostomum/Chabertia, Trichuris, Teladosargia/Ostertagia and Nematodirus) were identified. Among the identified genera, Haemonchus (25.4%) and Trichostrongylus (24.8%) were the dominant genera followed by mixed infection (21.8%), Oesophagostomum/Chabertia (10.4%), Trichuris (7.8%), Teladosargia (Ostertagia) (5.7%) and Nematodirus (4.1%). Mixed infections consisted either of double infections with Haemonchus and Trichostrongylus, or triple infections with Haemonchus, Trichostrongylus and Trichuris. The McMaster egg counting results showed that the mean EPG of infected sheep was 845.6. The results also showed 66 (34.2%), 101 (52.3%) and 26 (13.5%) sheep had low, moderate and heavy worm burden, respectively. Albendazole and Ivermectin showed low efficacy (percentage reductions = 90% and 92%; 95% lower confidence limit = 82.1% and 83.6% respectively) whereas Tetramisole was effective (FECR% = 96.8%; 95% LCL = 93.4%). Factors such as age, body condition, management system and past deworming history of sheep were found to have a statistically significant (p < 0.05) influence on the occurrence and burden of the worms. This is further explained as the highest prevalence and worm burden was detected in sheep of young age (p = 0.008; OR = 0.58; 95% CI = 0.39-0.87), poor body condition (p = 0.001; OR = 0.08; 95% CI = 0.04-0.16) and sheep kept under semi-intensive (p = 0.04; OR = 1.53; 95% CI = 1.02-2.29) with no deworming history for the last two months (p = 0.001; OR = 2.97; 95% CI = 1.94-4.56). The study results revealed that nematode infections were among sheep health constraints that could hurt their productivity while low efficacy of Albendazole and Ivermectin were detected. Therefore, the appropriate management techniques of GIN infections should be designed and implemented. Moreover, a further study involving more sensitive techniques (e.g. Mini-FLOTAC, molecular, and serological techniques) should be conducted by considering different host and environmental risk factors such as production level and seasons.


Asunto(s)
Antihelmínticos , Haemonchus , Nematodos , Infecciones por Nematodos , Enfermedades de las Ovejas , Animales , Ovinos , Albendazol/uso terapéutico , Ivermectina/farmacología , Etiopía/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Enfermedades de las Ovejas/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades de las Ovejas/epidemiología , Recuento de Huevos de Parásitos/veterinaria , Antihelmínticos/uso terapéutico , Antihelmínticos/farmacología , Infecciones por Nematodos/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Nematodos/epidemiología , Infecciones por Nematodos/veterinaria , Rumiantes , Trichostrongylus , Oesophagostomum , Trichuris , Heces
4.
Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist ; 24: 100527, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38447333

RESUMEN

Haemonchus contortus and Trichostrongylus colubriformis are the most important gastrointestinal nematodes causing serious losses in sheep production of tropical and subtropical regions. Prophylaxis of gastrointestinal nematode infections is based on anthelmintics use, but their frequent administration selects multiple-resistant parasites. To evaluate how the situation has changed over the last decades, the anthelmintic resistance status of gastrointestinal nematodes in sheep flocks was assessed in the current study and compared to previous surveys. In each one of the 15 flocks evaluated, animals (n ≥ 7) were allocated into at least five groups and treated as follows: 1) untreated control; 2) albendazole; 3) levamisole; 4) ivermectin; and 5) monepantel. If more animals were available, two additional groups were included: 6) closantel, and 7) moxidectin. The faecal egg count reduction test (FECRT) was carried out to evaluate the pre- and post-treatment using the SHINY tool. Haemonchus spp. was the most prevalent nematode from faecal cultures. The mean efficacy of albendazole was 40%. Only in two farms, levamisole presented a relatively high percentage of reduction in the FECRT about 90%, while ivermectin and moxidectin presented the worst mean efficacy of 34% and 21% among all farms, respectively. Like other anthelmintics, closantel demonstrated low efficacy (63%) across all farms evaluated. Monepantel presented an overall mean efficacy of 79%, but it was the only anthelmintic that presented efficacy ≥95%, in five farms. The results revealed that gastrointestinal nematodes with multiple anthelmintic resistance were prevalent in all 15 sheep herds. The research suggests that nematodes are becoming more and more resistant to various anthelmintic compounds, which has made the problem worse. This circumstance highlights the necessity to put into practice sustainable and long-lasting methods to prevent gastrointestinal nematode infections in sheep husbandry.


Asunto(s)
Aminoacetonitrilo/análogos & derivados , Antihelmínticos , Haemonchus , Macrólidos , Nematodos , Infecciones por Nematodos , Salicilanilidas , Enfermedades de las Ovejas , Animales , Ovinos , Levamisol/farmacología , Levamisol/uso terapéutico , Ivermectina/uso terapéutico , Albendazol/uso terapéutico , Brasil/epidemiología , Antihelmínticos/farmacología , Antihelmínticos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Nematodos/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Nematodos/epidemiología , Infecciones por Nematodos/veterinaria , Heces/parasitología , Enfermedades de las Ovejas/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades de las Ovejas/epidemiología , Enfermedades de las Ovejas/parasitología , Recuento de Huevos de Parásitos/veterinaria , Resistencia a Medicamentos
5.
mBio ; 15(3): e0009524, 2024 Mar 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38358246

RESUMEN

Gastrointestinal nematode (GIN) infections are a major concern for the ruminant industry worldwide and result in significant production losses. Naturally occurring polyparasitism and increasing drug resistance that potentiate disease outcomes are observed among the most prevalent GINs of veterinary importance. Within the five major taxonomic clades, clade Va represents a group of GINs that predominantly affect the abomasum or small intestine of ruminants. However, the development of effective broad-spectrum anthelmintics against ruminant clade Va GINs has been challenged by a lack of comprehensive druggable genome resources. Here, we first assembled draft genomes for three clade Va species (Cooperia oncophora, Trichostrongylus colubriformis, and Ostertagia ostertagi) and compared them with closely related ruminant GINs. Genome-wide phylogenetic reconstruction showed a relationship among ruminant GINs structured by taxonomic classification. Orthogroup (OG) inference and functional enrichment analyses identified 220 clade Va-specific and Va-conserved OGs, enriched for functions related to cell cycle and cellular senescence. Further transcriptomic analysis identified 61 taxonomically and functionally conserved clade Va OGs that may function as drug targets for new broad-spectrum anthelmintics. Chemogenomic screening identified 11 compounds targeting homologs of these OGs, thus having potential anthelmintic activity. In in vitro phenotypic assays, three kinase inhibitors (digitoxigenin, K-252a, and staurosporine) exhibited broad-spectrum anthelmintic activities against clade Va GINs by obstructing the motility of exsheathed L3 (xL3) or molting of xL3 to L4. These results demonstrate valuable applications of the new ruminant GIN genomes in gaining better insights into their life cycles and offer a contemporary approach to discovering the next generation of anthelmintics.IMPORTANCEGastrointestinal nematode (GIN) infections in ruminants are caused by parasites that inhibit normal function in the digestive tract of cattle, sheep, and goats, thereby causing morbidity and mortality. Coinfection and increasing drug resistance to current therapeutic agents will continue to worsen disease outcomes and impose significant production losses on domestic livestock producers worldwide. In combination with ongoing therapeutic efforts, advancing the discovery of new drugs with novel modes of action is critical for better controlling GIN infections. The significance of this study is in assembling and characterizing new GIN genomes of Cooperia oncophora, Ostertagia ostertagi, and Trichostrongylus colubriformis for facilitating a multi-omics approach to identify novel, biologically conserved drug targets for five major GINs of veterinary importance. With this information, we were then able to demonstrate the potential of commercially available compounds as new anthelmintics.


Asunto(s)
Antihelmínticos , Enfermedades de los Bovinos , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales , Nematodos , Infecciones por Nematodos , Animales , Bovinos , Ovinos , Filogenia , Rumiantes/parasitología , Infecciones por Nematodos/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Nematodos/parasitología , Infecciones por Nematodos/veterinaria , Cabras
6.
Vet Parasitol ; 327: 110148, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38364348

RESUMEN

Extensive farming systems form an integral part of sheep production systems across Europe. However, with innate production handicaps, declining sheep numbers and narrow economic margins, production is becoming increasingly challenging threatening the future sustainability of the industry. Gastrointestinal nematodes (GINs) are a significant cause of production losses to the global sheep industry, with well-established resistance to the major anthelmintic groups. Traditionally, extensive farming systems are not thought to have a significant parasite challenge compared with intensive farms, but there is a need to identify the scale and importance of GINs on extensive farms to inform the need for sustainable control strategies. In this study, a questionnaire of extensive farmers (n=34) was conducted and parasitological data were collected from nine study farms to investigate the perceived versus actual GIN and anthelmintic resistance challenge faced by extensive farms. The results showed a production-limiting challenge on most farms, with a higher GIN challenge observed on improved pastures. Furthermore, over half of the extensive farmers perceived anthelmintic resistance to be a greater problem for intensive farmers, with only 20% of respondents reporting known anthelmintic resistance. However, all study farms had evidence of resistance to at least one group of anthelmintics. Consequently, this study has demonstrated that despite the traditional perception of parasitism on extensive farms, there is a need to increasingly consider its impact and take a proactive approach to sustainable control, with solutions tailored to their unique management.


Asunto(s)
Antihelmínticos , Nematodos , Infecciones por Nematodos , Enfermedades de las Ovejas , Animales , Ovinos , Granjas , Infecciones por Nematodos/prevención & control , Infecciones por Nematodos/veterinaria , Infecciones por Nematodos/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades de las Ovejas/parasitología , Antihelmínticos/uso terapéutico , Antihelmínticos/farmacología , Resistencia a Medicamentos
7.
Vet Parasitol ; 325: 110079, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38029560

RESUMEN

Resistance to the benzimidazole and macrocyclic lactone anthelmintics is widespread in Cooperia spp. on cattle farms in New Zealand. Since this was first documented in 2006 little has changed in cattle farming systems except for the widespread use of levamisole to control Cooperia spp. in young cattle (i.e., parasite control has maintained an almost total reliance on use of anthelmintics). Here we report the emergence of simultaneous resistance to the benzimidazole, macrocyclic lactone and levamisole anthelmintics in Cooperia spp. and in Ostertagia spp. Anthelmintic efficacy against nematode parasites of cattle was investigated on four commercial farms following reports of poor animal growth rates and welfare, and positive faecal egg counts, despite routine treatment with combination anthelmintics, which included levamisole. Faecal egg count reduction tests involved 15 animals per treatment group, individual egg counts (paired samples) conducted pre- and post-treatment, with eggs counted to ≤ 15 eggs per g faeces and larval cultures for morphological identification. Actives tested varied between farms but always included levamisole alone and several combination products containing levamisole. Of the 20 tests conducted (i.e., 5 products on each of 4 farms) only 3 exceeded 90% efficacy against Cooperia spp. even though 8 of the products tested were combinations containing levamisole and at least one other broad-spectrum anthelmintic. Levamisole used alone achieved efficacies between 44% and 71% against Cooperia spp. across the four trials. The only product to exceed 95% efficacy against Cooperia spp. was a combination of monepantel + abamectin which was 100% effective against all parasites. Resistance to oxfendazole in Ostertagia spp. was indicated on 3 farms, while on one farm efficacy of all the tested products was ≤75% against this parasite. All the farms involved in this study were farming intensive cattle operations with an almost total reliance on anthelmintics to control parasitism. The results clearly demonstrate the emergence of simultaneous resistance to oxfendazole, levamisole and the macrocyclic lactone anthelmintics. Despite years of advice and recommendations to change farming practices away from intensive monocultures, many farmers have continued with the practice, and some are now faced with the very real possibility of being unable to control cattle parasites on their farms.


Asunto(s)
Antihelmínticos , Enfermedades de los Bovinos , Nematodos , Infecciones por Nematodos , Parásitos , Trichostrongyloidea , Animales , Bovinos , Levamisol/farmacología , Levamisol/uso terapéutico , Nueva Zelanda/epidemiología , Resistencia a Medicamentos , Óvulo , Antihelmínticos/farmacología , Antihelmínticos/uso terapéutico , Heces/parasitología , Ostertagia , Bencimidazoles/farmacología , Bencimidazoles/uso terapéutico , Recuento de Huevos de Parásitos/veterinaria , Enfermedades de los Bovinos/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades de los Bovinos/parasitología , Infecciones por Nematodos/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Nematodos/epidemiología , Infecciones por Nematodos/veterinaria
8.
Rev Bras Parasitol Vet ; 33(1): e013223, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38126572

RESUMEN

The aim of this study was to assess the in vitro ovicidal activity of an ethyl acetate extract from Arceuthobium vaginatum (EtOAc-E) and their subfractions (AvR5-AvR14) against Haemonchus contortus using the egg hatching inhibition (EHI) test. The EtOAc-E and subfractions were tested at 0.12-2.00 and at 0.015-2.0 mg/mL, respectively. Distilled water and methanol (2%) were used as negative controls and Thiabendazole (0.10 mg/mL) as a positive control. Treatments with a dependent effect on concentration were subjected to regression analysis to determine the effective concentrations (EC50 and EC90). The major secondary compounds present in the extract and subfractions were identified by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The EtOAc-E and AvR9 exhibited the best ovicidal effect recording 97.5 and 100% of EHI at 0.25 mg/mL, respectively. The EtOAc-E and AvR9 displayed an EC50= 0.12 and 0.08 mg/mL, respectively. The HPLC analysis in the EtOAc-E and bioactive fractions indicated the presence of a polyphenol, glycosylated flavanones, quercetin glucoside, cinnamates, coumarin, cinnamic acid derivative, ferulic acid, coumarate, naringenin, protocatechuic acid and naringin. Results demonstrated that A. vaginatum extract and fraction is able to inhibit the egg hatch process of H. contortus and could be a viable option for the control of small ruminant haemonchosis.


Asunto(s)
Antihelmínticos , Haemonchus , Infecciones por Nematodos , Viscaceae , Animales , Antihelmínticos/farmacología , Antihelmínticos/uso terapéutico , Polifenoles/farmacología , Infecciones por Nematodos/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Nematodos/veterinaria , Extractos Vegetales/farmacología
9.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ; 30(60): 125439-125463, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38015400

RESUMEN

Widespread and improper use of various anthelmintics, genetic, and epidemiological factors has resulted in anthelmintic-resistant (AR) helminth populations in livestock. This is currently quite common globally in different livestock animals including sheep, goats, and cattle to gastrointestinal nematode (GIN) infections. Therefore, the mechanisms underlying AR in parasitic worm species have been the subject of ample research to tackle this challenge. Current and emerging technologies in the disciplines of genomics, transcriptomics, metabolomics, and proteomics in livestock species have advanced the understanding of the intricate molecular AR mechanisms in many major parasites. The technologies have improved the identification of possible biomarkers of resistant parasites, the ability to find actual causative genes, regulatory networks, and pathways of parasites governing the AR development including the dynamics of helminth infection and host-parasite infections. In this review, various "omics"-driven technologies including genome scan, candidate gene, quantitative trait loci, transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic approaches have been described to understand AR of parasites of veterinary importance. Also, challenges and future prospects of these "omics" approaches are also discussed.


Asunto(s)
Antihelmínticos , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales , Nematodos , Infecciones por Nematodos , Animales , Bovinos , Ovinos , Ganado , Proteómica , Infecciones por Nematodos/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Nematodos/parasitología , Infecciones por Nematodos/veterinaria , Antihelmínticos/farmacología , Antihelmínticos/uso terapéutico , Cabras
10.
Vet Parasitol ; 323S: 110070, 2023 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37935607

RESUMEN

Macrocyclic lactone (ML) resistance in cattle gastrointestinal nematodes (GINs) is an increasing problem. Concurrent combination anthelmintic therapy incorporating an existing ML with a second drug class has been proposed to control cattle GINs while slowing the development of ML resistance. Two dose confirmation studies were conducted to investigate the efficacy of a new fixed-dose combination injectable (FDCI) anthelmintic against common cattle GINs known to negatively impact production. The FDCI is formulated with 5 mg/ml doramectin and 150 mg/ml levamisole hydrochloride (HCl). Cattle enrolled in the two studies were sourced from either the Southern (Study 1, n = 30) or Midwest (Study 2, n = 36) United States. Animals with GIN infections confirmed by fecal egg count (FEC) were randomly allocated to one of three treatment groups. On Day 0, cattle with positive FECs on Day -5( ± 2) were weighed and administered a single subcutaneous injection of either saline (0.9% sodium chloride) at 0.04 ml/kg, 10 mg/ml doramectin at 0.02 ml/kg (to provide 0.2 mg/kg doramectin) or the FDCI at 0.04 ml/kg (to provide 0.2 mg/kg doramectin and 6.0 mg/kg levamisole HCl). On Day 14, fecal samples were collected, animals were euthanized, and worms were collected from the intestinal tract of each animal. Treatment efficacy was calculated using worm burdens and the fecal egg count reduction test (FECRT). Pre-treatment (Day -5, Study 1; Day -3, Study 2) mean FECs were 999.4-1136.2 eggs per gram (EPG) in Study 1 and 137.1-226.6 EPG in Study 2. The FDCI was active against cattle GIN populations in both studies, with FECRT ≥ 99.98% in both studies. Compared to saline-treated cattle, FDCI-treated cattle had significantly fewer adult and immature worms of all identified species on Day 14. In Study 1, Day 14 efficacy of the FDCI was 96.9% for Cooperia spp. (C. oncophora (99.7%) and C. punctata (95.9%)), 99.1% for Nematodirus helvetianus, and 99.8% for Ostertagia spp. In Study 2, the FDCI provided 100% efficacy against all adult GIN species identified, including all GINs identified in Study 1 and Trichostrongylus axei. The FDCI also provided 95.5% efficacy against immature Ostertagia spp. and 100% efficacy against immature Cooperia spp. (Study 2). Doramectin was effective against all adult cattle GINs (except N. helvetianus) in Study 2 but was only effective against adult Ostertagia spp. in Study 1. Additionally, doramectin was only effective against immature Cooperia spp. (and not immature Ostertagia spp.) in Study 2. A single administration of the doramectin + levamisole HCl FDCI provides a new and effective approach to the treatment and control of common cattle GINs, including those exhibiting decreased susceptibility to doramectin alone.


Asunto(s)
Antihelmínticos , Enfermedades de los Bovinos , Nematodos , Infecciones por Nematodos , Animales , Bovinos , Levamisol/uso terapéutico , Levamisol/farmacología , Infecciones por Nematodos/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Nematodos/veterinaria , Óvulo , Ivermectina , Antihelmínticos/farmacología , Heces , Lactonas/farmacología , Enfermedades de los Bovinos/tratamiento farmacológico , Recuento de Huevos de Parásitos/veterinaria
11.
Vet Parasitol ; 324: 110056, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37897851

RESUMEN

Parasitism with gastrointestinal nematodes (GIN) is a worldwide issue impacting negatively on animal production, health, and welfare. Therefore, early diagnostic signs of parasitism are required to allow for timely interventions. The objective of this study was to evaluate the behavioural and physiological changes in lambs associated with GIN infection. We used 30, 8-month-old Romney-cross wethers, that were administered anthelmintics until faecal egg counts (FEC) were zero and housed in an indoor facility. The study lasted 9 weeks, which comprised a 3-week pre-treatment, and a 6-week treatment phase. Lambs were randomly assigned to one of two treatments (n = 15/treatment) trickle-dosed with: 1) 1500 infective third stage larvae (L3) three days/week for 6 weeks (27,000 total L3; challenged), or 2) water 3 days/week for 6 weeks (control). Within each pen there were 5 pairs of lambs (balanced for liveweight), with each pair comprising a challenged and control lamb. Blood, faecal, and saliva samples were collected 1 week pre-treatment and weekly for 6 weeks of treatment. Behaviour was observed (e.g., feeding, lying, standing) from video-camera recordings using scan sampling every 5 min for 8 h, 1 day pre-treatment and on the day immediately prior to physiological sampling across the 6-week treatment phase (7 days in total). Accelerometers were attached to each lamb to continuously monitor behaviour from 3 weeks pre-treatment and for the remainder of the study. Liveweight, body condition, faecal soiling and faecal consistency scoring were performed weekly as was lipidomic analysis of plasma samples. From week 2 of treatment, challenged lambs spent less time feeding and more time lying than control lambs until week 5 of treatment (P ≤ 0.01). At week 3 of treatment, elevated lipids (mainly triglycerides and phospholipids), loose faeces and faecal soiling around the anus were observed in challenged lambs compared with controls (P ≤ 0.05). From week 4 of treatment, FEC were elevated in the challenged compared to control lambs (P ≤ 0.05). There was also lower liveweight gain at 4 and 5 weeks of treatment in the challenged lambs compared with control lambs (P ≤ 0.05). These results show a clear timeline of changes in behaviour (e.g., feeding and lying), lipids such as triglycerides, and digestive function (e.g., faecal soiling) suggestive of GIN subclinical disease, which show promise for use in future studies on early identification of subclinical GIN parasitism in lambs.


Asunto(s)
Incontinencia Fecal , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales , Nematodos , Infecciones por Nematodos , Enfermedades de las Ovejas , Animales , Ovinos , Masculino , Incontinencia Fecal/veterinaria , Oveja Doméstica , Infecciones por Nematodos/veterinaria , Infecciones por Nematodos/tratamiento farmacológico , Heces , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/veterinaria , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/tratamiento farmacológico , Triglicéridos/uso terapéutico , Lípidos/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades de las Ovejas/tratamiento farmacológico , Recuento de Huevos de Parásitos/veterinaria
12.
Vet Parasitol ; 323S: 110054, 2023 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37879976

RESUMEN

Gastrointestinal nematodes (GINs) can negatively impact all production classes of cattle, particularly growing cattle. A global decline in efficacy of broad-spectrum single-active anthelmintics requires alternative GIN control methods without the aid of novel drug classes. Here, we present a new fixed-dose combination injectable (FDCI) endectocide for cattle that combines doramectin (5 mg/ml) and levamisole hydrochloride (150 mg/ml). A 56-day comparative performance confinement backgrounding trial was conducted in stocker beef heifers (n = 1548) with confirmed GIN infections to (1) compare the Day 14 post-treatment effectiveness of the new FDCI endectocide to pen mates treated with the injectable single-active endectocide ivermectin, as evidenced by fecal egg counts (FECs) conducted for a randomly selected subset (10%) of both treatment groups, and (2) determine if the greater GIN control by the FDCI evidenced in the subsample improved growth performance in all FDCI-treated heifers. Heifers were procured in four cohorts, with a 10-week timeframe between enrollment of the first and last cohort. Treatment groups were comingled within dirt-floor pens (n = 31; 7-8 per cohort) and offered a standard backgrounding diet ad libitum for the study duration. Heifers with enrollment FEC ≥ 30 eggs per gram (EPG) were randomly allocated to receive the FDCI (n = 773) or ivermectin (n = 775) on Day 0. Day 0 FECs conducted on 10% of enrolled heifers (FDCI, n = 78; ivermectin, n = 79) were not different between treatment groups (p = 0.491). Day 14 FECs for the same heifers were reduced compared to Day 0 within each treatment group. Heifers given the FDCI had lower Day 14 AM FECs and higher FEC reduction test (FECRT) result (0.07 EPG; 0.999) than ivermectin-treated heifers (21.58 EPG; FECRT = 0.850). Mean body weight (BW) was not different between treatment groups on Day 0 (p = 0.2762) and Day 14 (p = 0.2010) but was significantly greater (p = 0.0007) for FDCI-treated heifers compared to ivermectin-treated heifers on Day 56. Compared to ivermectin-treated heifers, overall average daily gain from all evaluation periods (Day 0-14, Day 14-56, and Day 0-56) was greater (p ≤ 0.0052) in FDCI-treated heifers, and FDCI-treated heifers had 4.223 kg greater total weight gain over the 56-day study. The FDCI (0.2 mg/kg doramectin + 6.0 mg/kg levamisole hydrochloride) was highly effective in reducing GIN infections and thus promoted improved growth performance in beef heifers over a 56-day backgrounding period.


Asunto(s)
Antihelmínticos , Enfermedades de los Bovinos , Infecciones por Nematodos , Animales , Bovinos , Femenino , Antihelmínticos/administración & dosificación , Enfermedades de los Bovinos/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades de los Bovinos/parasitología , Heces , Ivermectina/administración & dosificación , Levamisol/administración & dosificación , Infecciones por Nematodos/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Nematodos/veterinaria , Recuento de Huevos de Parásitos/veterinaria
13.
Vet Parasitol ; 322: 110026, 2023 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37713957

RESUMEN

Targeted Selective Treatment (TST) is a gastrointestinal nematode (GIN) control strategy where anthelmintic treatment decisions are made at an individual animal level. TST has been proven to reduce anthelmintic use and subsequently slow down anthelmintic resistance development, however questions remain regarding optimal TST methods and their applicability across farms. In this study, the influence of Mineral and Vitamin (MV) supplementation on optimal energy utilisation (EU) TST thresholds was assessed on three Welsh farms. In total, 360 lambs were split into two groups, MV supplemented and control, and were treated with an anthelmintic against GIN at the midway point of the experiment. Lambs that improved their EU efficiency post treatment were deemed to have benefited from anthelmintic treatment. Optimal EU TST thresholds was determined for each treatment group per farm using Youden's J statistic where the treatment threshold retrospectively exhibiting the greatest combined sensitivity and specificity in correctly identifying lambs benefiting from treatment was deemed to be optimal. Results demonstrated that the optimal EU TST threshold was higher in MV supplemented groups at 0.72, 0.71 and 0.56 versus 0.58, 0.67, 0.51 for control groups on each respective farm. Identification of lambs for TST was more effective when using an optimised EU TST threshold, compared to when using the standard EU TST threshold of 0.66. The study highlights that applying standard EU TST thresholds may not be appropriate on all commercial farms with factors including MV status as noted in this study likely to influence optimal EU TST thresholds. Additional refinement of TST systems can further strengthen their applicability across sheep flocks.


Asunto(s)
Antihelmínticos , Nematodos , Infecciones por Nematodos , Enfermedades de las Ovejas , Animales , Ovinos , Vitaminas/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Antihelmínticos/uso terapéutico , Vitamina A , Strongyloides , Vitamina K/uso terapéutico , Minerales/uso terapéutico , Suplementos Dietéticos , Enfermedades de las Ovejas/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades de las Ovejas/prevención & control , Heces , Infecciones por Nematodos/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Nematodos/prevención & control , Infecciones por Nematodos/veterinaria , Recuento de Huevos de Parásitos/veterinaria
14.
Vet Parasitol ; 323S: 110025, 2023 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37723000

RESUMEN

Australian producers have long used macrocyclic lactones (MLs) to successfully control cattle gastrointestinal nematodes (GINs) and consequently improve production parameters. However, the trajectory of ML resistance development in cattle GINs is following that of small ruminant nematode populations, highlighting a need for novel treatment options to provide efficacy in the current environment and interrupt the long-term establishment of ML-resistant GIN populations in Australian cattle. Here, we describe three field studies conducted in Australia to evaluate the efficacy of a single administration of a novel fixed-dose combination injectable (FDCI) endectocide against naturally acquired infections of cattle GINs. The FDCI is administered subcutaneously to deliver 0.2 mg/kg doramectin and 6 mg/kg levamisole hydrochloride (HCl). Study sites consisted of three farms in New South Wales (n = 2) and Victoria (n = 1). At each site, cattle were randomly allocated into one of three treatment groups: (1) untreated control (saline), (2) FDCI (0.2 mg/kg doramectin, 6 mg/kg levamisole HCl) or (3) positive control (0.2 mg/kg ivermectin). All treatments were administered on Day 0. Fecal samples were collected prior to treatment on Days -1 (Study 3) or 0 (Studies 1 and 2) and again on Day 14 (post-treatment) to evaluate efficacy via fecal egg count (FEC) and for coproculture. Adequacy of infection was confirmed at all three study sites, with Day 14 geometric mean (GM) FECs for saline-treated cattle ranging from 32.5 eggs per gram (EPG) to 623.7 EPG. FECs for FDCI-treated cattle were significantly reduced compared to saline-treated cattle (p ≤ 0.0001) on Day 14, with GM-based efficacy ≥ 99.7% at all three study sites. In contrast, ivermectin was 97.4% effective against cattle GINs in Study 1 but was only 47.2% and 39.8% effective at study site 2 and 3, respectively. Genus-specific efficacies suggest the presence of ivermectin-resistant Cooperia spp. (Study 1), Haemonchus spp. (Study 2) and Ostertagia spp. (Study 3) populations in the naturally infected cattle used in these studies. The post-treatment FEC and genus-specific efficacy estimations indicate the doramectin + levamisole HCl FDCI was highly efficacious against cattle GINs even in the face of ivermectin LOE at study sites 2 and 3. The efficacy of the new FDCI against both ML-susceptible and ML-resistant economically important cattle GINs in Australia affirms it is a valuable treatment option for producers operating in an environment of ML loss of efficacy.


Asunto(s)
Antihelmínticos , Enfermedades de los Bovinos , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales , Nematodos , Infecciones por Nematodos , Animales , Bovinos , Levamisol/uso terapéutico , Levamisol/farmacología , Ivermectina/uso terapéutico , Ivermectina/farmacología , Antihelmínticos/uso terapéutico , Antihelmínticos/farmacología , Óvulo , Infecciones por Nematodos/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Nematodos/veterinaria , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/veterinaria , Heces , Rumiantes , Victoria , Enfermedades de los Bovinos/tratamiento farmacológico , Recuento de Huevos de Parásitos/veterinaria
15.
Vet Parasitol ; 323S: 110023, 2023 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37689556

RESUMEN

We describe a new fixed-dose combination injectable (FDCI) formulated with doramectin and levamisole hydrochloride (HCl) to target broad and overlapping spectra of gastrointestinal nematodes (GINs) through two distinct modes of action. Here, we demonstrate the superior efficacy of the FDCI against mixed populations of cattle GINs in two dose confirmation studies conducted in Australia using artificially induced adult (Study 1) and immature (Study 2) GIN infections. Artificial infections consisted of Cooperia spp., Haemonchus placei, Ostertagia ostertagi, and Trichostrongylus axei. In both studies, cattle were inoculated with third-stage larvae and infections were confirmed by fecal egg count (FEC). Treatment groups in both studies were as follows: (1) negative control (saline, 0.9% sodium chloride), (2) positive control injectable endectocide (Study 1-0.2 mg/kg ivermectin; Study 2-0.2 mg/kg doramectin), (3) positive control injectable anthelmintic (7.5 mg/kg levamisole HCl), and (4) FDCI (0.2 mg/kg doramectin + 6.0 mg/kg levamisole HCl). Cattle were treated either 28 days (Study 1) or 6 days (Study 2) post-infection. On Days 14-16 (Study 1) or Days 20-21 (Study 2) post-treatment, cattle were euthanized and necropsied for the recovery, identification, and enumeration of worms. Treatment efficacy was calculated as reduction in worm burdens of treated cattle compared to saline-treated cattle, and treatments were considered effective if the geometric mean worm burden in the treatment group was reduced by ≥ 95% compared to the negative control group. In both studies, saline-treated cattle remained positive for GIN infections for the study duration. Ivermectin was less than 95% effective against Cooperia spp. (80.2%) and H. placei (24.8%) in Study 1, and levamisole HCl was less than 95% effective against Ostertagia spp. (47.1%) in Study 2. In contrast, the novel FDCI was 100% effective in treating adult and immature life stages of all cattle GINs included in the artificial infections, with no worms recovered at necropsy from doramectin + levamisole HCl-treated cattle. These data show a single administration of the FDCI provides broad-spectrum treatment of economically important cattle GINs.


Asunto(s)
Antihelmínticos , Enfermedades de los Bovinos , Nematodos , Infecciones por Nematodos , Trichostrongyloidea , Animales , Bovinos , Ivermectina/uso terapéutico , Ivermectina/farmacología , Levamisol/uso terapéutico , Levamisol/farmacología , Infecciones por Nematodos/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Nematodos/veterinaria , Australia , Antihelmínticos/uso terapéutico , Antihelmínticos/farmacología , Heces , Ostertagia , Enfermedades de los Bovinos/tratamiento farmacológico , Recuento de Huevos de Parásitos/veterinaria
16.
Vet Parasitol ; 323S: 109987, 2023 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37532652

RESUMEN

Reports of macrocyclic lactone (ML) loss of efficacy suggest ML resistance in gastrointestinal nematodes (GINs) is a growing problem in the US cattle industry. Empirical and modeling data support combining an ML and second anthelmintic from a different drug class to help ML resistance development while effectively treating existing resistant parasite populations. Here, we present a novel fixed-dose combination injectable (FDCI) solution for cattle that delivers 0.2 mg of doramectin and 6.0 mg of levamisole hydrochloride (HCl) per kg of body weight. Field studies were conducted at six sites across the Midwest United States to investigate the efficacy of a single administration of the FDCI in treating common cattle GINs. Cattle (n = 425) with GIN infections confirmed by fecal egg count (FEC) on Day -10( ± 2) were randomly allocated to the control (saline) or treatment (FDCI) group. On Day 0, pre-treatment fecal samples were collected, and cattle were administered a single subcutaneous injection of saline (n = 106) or FDCI (n = 319). Post-treatment fecal samples were collected on Day 14. Fecal egg count reduction tests (FECRTs) were conducted using Day 0 and Day 14 FECs. Efficacy was evaluated using Day 14 FECs (FDCI-treated versus saline-treated). Within treatment, samples collected on Days 0 and 14 with ≥ 20 eggs per gram (EPG) were cultured for nematode larvae recovery and identification. Day -10 FECs for enrolled animals were similar between treatment groups. Coprocultures from cattle with FEC ≥ 20 EPG (n = 68 saline; n = 211, FDCI) on Day 0 showed the presence of Cooperia punctata, Ostertagia spp., Haemonchus spp., C. oncophora, Oesophagostomum spp. and Trichostrongylus spp. Day 14 FECs for FDCI-treated cattle were significantly reduced (0-3 EPG) compared to saline-treated cattle (0-1252 EPG) (p ≤ 0.0042). At all study sites, the efficacy of the new FDCI was ≥ 99.4% and the FECR was 0.99 or 1.00. Day 14 coprocultures from control cattle showed infections of common GIN genera, confirming the efficacy of the FDCI against GINs in the field. A single administration of the doramectin + levamisole HCl combination injectable effectively treats common and economically important cattle GINs.


Asunto(s)
Antihelmínticos , Enfermedades de los Bovinos , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales , Nematodos , Infecciones por Nematodos , Animales , Bovinos , Levamisol/uso terapéutico , Levamisol/farmacología , Óvulo , Infecciones por Nematodos/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Nematodos/veterinaria , Infecciones por Nematodos/parasitología , Ivermectina , Antihelmínticos/farmacología , Heces/parasitología , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/veterinaria , Lactonas/farmacología , Enfermedades de los Bovinos/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades de los Bovinos/parasitología , Recuento de Huevos de Parásitos/veterinaria
17.
Vet Parasitol ; 323S: 109998, 2023 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37537024

RESUMEN

Intensive farming practices and heavy reliance on anthelmintics have contributed significantly to the problem of macrocyclic lactone (ML) resistance in New Zealand. Farmers now have few options for effectively controlling cattle gastrointestinal nematodes (GINs) and regularly experience sub-optimal efficacy against economically important species. We present a novel fixed-dose combination injectable (FDCI) that simultaneously delivers 0.2 mg/kg doramectin and 6 mg/kg levamisole hydrochloride (HCl) to target a broad spectrum of cattle GINs in a single dose, providing an additional solution to endoparasite control in an environment of anthelmintic resistance. A dose confirmation study was conducted using naturally acquired infections of GINs in beef cattle in New Zealand. Cattle with GIN infections confirmed by fecal egg count (FEC) were randomly allocated (n = 12 per group) to the control (saline-treated), FDCI-treated or doramectin-treated group. On Day 0, cattle were weighed and administered a single subcutaneous injection of saline or endectocide. Rectal fecal samples were collected from each animal on Day 7 for individual duplicate fecal egg count (FEC) analysis, and coprocultures were conducted on pooled fecal samples within each treatment group. All animals were euthanized and necropsied for worm recovery on Days 14 through 16. Treatment efficacy was calculated based on reduction in FECs and worm burdens. All enrolled cattle were positive for GINs based on Day -5 FECs, with geometric mean (GM) FECs ranging from 337 to 521 eggs per gram (EPG). All saline-treated cattle remained positive for GIN infections for the study duration (Day 7 GM FEC = 427 EPG). Necropsy and worm recoveries revealed the presence of doramectin-resistant Cooperia oncophora, C. surnabada and Trichostrongylus longispicularis, as evidenced by ≤ 72.3 % efficacy of doramectin against these species. The new FDCI was ≥ 99.8 % effective against all GIN species, including ML-resistant C. oncophora, C. surnabada and T. longispicularis, providing broad-spectrum efficacy and eliminating economically important cattle GINs, including ML-resistant populations.


Asunto(s)
Antihelmínticos , Enfermedades de los Bovinos , Nematodos , Infecciones por Nematodos , Animales , Bovinos , Levamisol/farmacología , Levamisol/uso terapéutico , Nueva Zelanda , Infecciones por Nematodos/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Nematodos/veterinaria , Infecciones por Nematodos/parasitología , Óvulo , Ivermectina/farmacología , Ivermectina/uso terapéutico , Antihelmínticos/farmacología , Antihelmínticos/uso terapéutico , Heces/parasitología , Lactonas/farmacología , Enfermedades de los Bovinos/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades de los Bovinos/parasitología , Recuento de Huevos de Parásitos/veterinaria
18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37579583

RESUMEN

The serious widespread development of nematode resistance has motivated the use of combined anthelmintic formulations. However, the advantages/disadvantages of the combined use of anthelmintics require further scientific characterization. The goals of the current trial were a) to characterize the pharmacokinetics of closantel (CLO) and moxidectin (MXD) administered both subcutaneously (sc) and orally either separately or co-administered (CLO + MXD) to lambs; b) to compare the nematodicidal activity of both molecules given individually or co-administered to lambs infected with resistant nematodes. Seventy (70) Corriedale lambs naturally infected with multiple resistant gastrointestinal nematodes were involved in the pharmacokinetic and efficacy trials. The animals were allocated into six groups (n = 10) and treated with either CLO, MXD, or with the CLO + MXD combined formulation by both the oral and sc routes. Additionally, an untreated control group (n = 10) was included for the efficacy trial. The efficacy was estimated by the faecal egg count reduction test (FECRT). Higher systemic exposure of both CLO and MXD was observed after the sc compared to the oral administration in lambs. The combined administration of CLO + MXD did not markedly alter their disposition kinetics. At 13 days post-treatment, the administration of both molecules as a single active principle reached efficacy levels ranging between 80% (MXDoral), 84% (CLOoral), 85% (CLOsc), and 92% (MXDsc). The combined oral and sc treatments reached 99% efficacy. No adverse effects were observed after the combined treatment of CLO + MXD, and their co-administration did not show any adverse pharmacokinetic interaction. The combined effect of CLO + MXD successfully restored the maximum efficacy levels, which were not reached by the individual active ingredients.


Asunto(s)
Antihelmínticos , Nematodos , Infecciones por Nematodos , Enfermedades de las Ovejas , Animales , Heces , Ivermectina/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Nematodos/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Nematodos/veterinaria , Recuento de Huevos de Parásitos/veterinaria , Ovinos , Enfermedades de las Ovejas/tratamiento farmacológico
19.
Vet Parasitol ; 319: 109955, 2023 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37201354

RESUMEN

Refugia-based strategies associated with a combination of anthelmintic drugs belonging to different drug classes are becoming more common management practices to mitigate anthelmintic resistance (AR) in gastrointestinal nematodes (GIN) in small ruminants. Though refugia-based strategies have been largely demonstrated in small ruminants, cattle veterinarians and producers are considering such management strategies in grazing cattle production systems. Implementing refugia-based strategies lowers the amount of anthelmintics used in the herd and therefore slows the progression of AR by allowing a proportion of worms to escape drug selection pressure. The objective of this study was to observe the effect of a refugia-based strategy on body weight (BW), average daily gain (ADG) and fecal egg counts (FEC) of trichostongyle-type nematodes in naturally infected beef calves over a 131-day grazing season when compared with a whole herd treatment strategy, using the same combination of drugs. Stocker calves (n = 160) were ranked by body weight within sex then allocated to 16 paddocks, which were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. All calves in Group 1 (n = 80) were administered treatment, while in Group 2 (n = 80) the steer with the highest FEC in eggs per gram (EPG) within the paddock was left untreated. Treated calves received an extended release injectable 5 % eprinomectin (LongRange®, Boehringer Ingelheim Animal Health USA Inc.; 1 mL/50 kg of BW) and a 22.5 % oxfendazole oral suspension (Synanthic®, Boehringer Ingelheim Animal Health USA Inc.; 1 mL/50 kg of BW). Fecal egg counts and BW were recorded on days (D) -35, 0, 21, 131, and 148 to calculate the average fecal egg count reduction (FECR) and ADG for both groups. Linear mixed models, with paddock as the experimental unit, were used for analyses. The EPG differed on D21 (p < 0.01) and D131 (p = 0.057) with Group 2 having a higher average FEC (15.2 EPG D21; 57 EPG D131) compared with Group 1 (0.4 EPG D21; 37.25 EPG D131). However, there was no significant difference in average BW or ADG between treatment groups throughout the study. Results suggest refugia-based strategies could be implemented without significant negative impacts on average BW and ADG across other calves in the herd.


Asunto(s)
Antihelmínticos , Enfermedades de los Bovinos , Nematodos , Infecciones por Nematodos , Animales , Bovinos , Refugio de Fauna , Infecciones por Nematodos/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Nematodos/prevención & control , Infecciones por Nematodos/veterinaria , Óvulo , Antihelmínticos/farmacología , Aumento de Peso , Peso Corporal , Heces , Rumiantes , Recuento de Huevos de Parásitos/veterinaria , Enfermedades de los Bovinos/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades de los Bovinos/prevención & control
20.
PLoS Pathog ; 19(4): e1011285, 2023 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37011090

RESUMEN

Treatment of parasitic nematode infections in humans and livestock relies on a limited arsenal of anthelmintic drugs that have historically reduced parasite burdens. However, anthelmintic resistance (AR) is increasing, and little is known about the molecular and genetic causes of resistance for most drugs. The free-living roundworm Caenorhabditis elegans has proven to be a tractable model to understand AR, where studies have led to the identification of molecular targets of all major anthelmintic drug classes. Here, we used genetically diverse C. elegans strains to perform dose-response analyses across 26 anthelmintic drugs that represent the three major anthelmintic drug classes (benzimidazoles, macrocyclic lactones, and nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonists) in addition to seven other anthelmintic classes. First, we found that C. elegans strains displayed similar anthelmintic responses within drug classes and significant variation across drug classes. Next, we compared the effective concentration estimates to induce a 10% maximal response (EC10) and slope estimates of each dose-response curve of each strain to the laboratory reference strain, which enabled the identification of anthelmintics with population-wide differences to understand how genetics contribute to AR. Because genetically diverse strains displayed differential susceptibilities within and across anthelmintics, we show that C. elegans is a useful model for screening potential nematicides before applications to helminths. Third, we quantified the levels of anthelmintic response variation caused by genetic differences among individuals (heritability) to each drug and observed a significant correlation between exposure closest to the EC10 and the exposure that exhibited the most heritable responses. These results suggest drugs to prioritize in genome-wide association studies, which will enable the identification of AR genes.


Asunto(s)
Antihelmínticos , Nematodos , Infecciones por Nematodos , Humanos , Animales , Caenorhabditis elegans , Estudio de Asociación del Genoma Completo , Antihelmínticos/farmacología , Nematodos/genética , Antinematodos/farmacología , Infecciones por Nematodos/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Nematodos/genética , Infecciones por Nematodos/parasitología , Resistencia a Medicamentos/genética
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...