Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 113
Filtrar
1.
Psychopharmacology (Berl) ; 240(1): 1-13, 2023 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36399187

RESUMEN

RATIONALE: Assessment of the bioeffect of serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRIs, including both selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs)) at the serotonin transporter (SERT) in patients and healthy controls can have important theoretical and clinical implications. OBJECTIVES: Bioeffect at SERT has been assessed by neuroimaging of brain SERT occupancy, through in vitro measurements of platelet serotonin (5-HT) uptake, and by measuring platelet 5-HT content pre- and post-initiation of SRI administration. Studies of platelet 5-HT content were reviewed in order to (1) determine the overall apparent bioeffect of SRIs; (2) compare bioeffect across types of SRIs; (3) compare the three approaches to assessing SRI bioeffect; and (4) determine how the findings might inform clinical practice. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of the published studies that measured platelet 5-HT content to assess SRI bioeffect at the platelet SERT. Studies using neuroimaging and in vitro platelet 5-HT uptake to assess SRI bioeffect were reviewed for comparison purposes. RESULTS: Clinical doses of SRIs typically resulted in 70-90% reductions in platelet 5-HT content. The observed bioeffect at the platelet SERT appeared similar among different SSRIs and SNRIs. The bioeffect estimations based on platelet 5-HT content were consistent with those obtained using neuroimaging to assess brain SERT occupancy and those based on the in vitro measurement of platelet 5-HT uptake. CONCLUSIONS: In general, excellent agreement was seen in the apparent SRI bioeffect (70-90% inhibition) among the platelet 5-HT content studies and across the three bioeffect approaches. Theoretical and practical clinical implications are discussed.


Asunto(s)
Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina , Inhibidores de Captación de Serotonina y Norepinefrina , Humanos , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/farmacología , Serotonina/farmacología , Proteínas de Transporte de Serotonina en la Membrana Plasmática , Inhibidores de Captación de Serotonina y Norepinefrina/farmacología , Plaquetas
2.
Psychopharmacology (Berl) ; 239(10): 3133-3143, 2022 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35882635

RESUMEN

RATIONALE: It is known that both selective serotonin and serotonin noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SSRI, SNRI) are first-line drugs for the treatment of major depressive disorder. It has also been considered that both SSRI and SNRI can improve the symptoms of major depressive disorder by increasing the concentration of monoamine in the synaptic cleft based on the monoamine hypothesis. However, accumulating evidence has indicated that inflammation in the brain may be a key factor in the pathophysiological mechanisms that underlie the development of major depressive disorder. OBJECTIVES: It has been advocated that microglial cells may regulate the inflammatory response under pathological conditions such as major depressive disorder. In this study, we focused on whether duloxetine can ameliorate the inflammatory response induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in BV-2 microglial cells. RESULTS: Our results indicated that duloxetine significantly decreased the NO production induced by LPS. The increase in the protein expression level of iNOS induced by LPS was significantly decreased by treatment with duloxetine. Moreover, the increases in the protein expression levels of phosphorylated-IκBα, phosphorylated-Akt and Akt induced by LPS were also significantly decreased. Unexpectedly, the protein expression levels of other pro-inflammatory factors such as COX-2 and the phosphorylation ratios for various molecules including IκBα and Akt were not changed by treatment with duloxetine. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that duloxetine may have an anti-inflammatory effect, which could contribute to its therapeutic effectiveness for major depressive disorder.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo Mayor , Inhibidores de Captación de Serotonina y Norepinefrina , Animales , Antiinflamatorios/farmacología , Ciclooxigenasa 2/metabolismo , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/metabolismo , Clorhidrato de Duloxetina/farmacología , Lipopolisacáridos/farmacología , Ratones , Microglía/metabolismo , Inhibidor NF-kappaB alfa/metabolismo , FN-kappa B/metabolismo , Óxido Nítrico/metabolismo , Óxido Nítrico Sintasa de Tipo II/metabolismo , Óxido Nítrico Sintasa de Tipo II/farmacología , Norepinefrina/metabolismo , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas c-akt/metabolismo , Serotonina/metabolismo , Inhibidores de Captación de Serotonina y Norepinefrina/farmacología
3.
J Psychopharmacol ; 36(2): 131-150, 2022 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35098788

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have suggested that microglial activation plays a key role in the pathogenesis of depression. In fact, neuroinflammation is associated with a phenotypic change of microglia, consisting of morphological differences, increased release of cytokines and oxidative stress products, which may contribute to the development and maintenance of depression. Antidepressants, including selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, have been shown to act on the immune and oxidative stress mechanisms commonly found to be disrupted in depression. Thus, the inhibition of microglial activation may be one of the mechanisms through which they exert an antidepressant action. AIM: This is the first review summarising in vitro and ex vivo studies investigating the effects of different classes of antidepressants on microglia activation, by examining cellular changes and/or via measuring the production of immune and/or oxidative stress signalling molecules, in microglia models of neuroinflammation with either lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or cytokines. A total of 23 studies were identified, 18 using LPS stimulation and 5 using cytokines stimulation. RESULTS: Overall, the studies show that antidepressants, such as selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, monoamine oxidase inhibitors and tricyclic antidepressants prevented microglial activation, including reduced microglial reactivity and decreased immune and oxidative stress products, in both models. However, specific antidepressants, such as bupropion and agomelatine did not prevent interferon-gamma (IFN-γ)-induced microglial activation; and for other antidepressants, including phenelzine, venlafaxine and sertraline, the results of different studies were inconsistent. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, results summarised in this review support the hypothesis that the action of at least certain classes of antidepressants may involve regulation of microglial activation, especially when in presence of increased levels of inflammation.


Asunto(s)
Antidepresivos/farmacología , Depresión/tratamiento farmacológico , Microglía/efectos de los fármacos , Animales , Depresión/fisiopatología , Humanos , Enfermedades Neuroinflamatorias/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Neuroinflamatorias/fisiopatología , Estrés Oxidativo/efectos de los fármacos , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/farmacología , Inhibidores de Captación de Serotonina y Norepinefrina/farmacología
4.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 24384, 2021 12 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34934078

RESUMEN

A growing body of evidence suggests nigral iron accumulation plays an important role in the pathophysiology of Parkinson's disease (PD), contributing to dopaminergic neuron loss in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc). Converging evidence suggests this accumulation might be related to, or increased by, serotonergic dysfunction, a common, often early feature of the disease. We investigated whether lower plasma serotonin in PD is associated with higher nigral iron. We obtained plasma samples from 97 PD patients and 89 controls and MRI scans from a sub-cohort (62 PD, 70 controls). We measured serotonin concentrations using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography and regional iron content using MRI-based quantitative susceptibility mapping. PD patients had lower plasma serotonin (p < 0.0001) and higher nigral iron content (SNc: p < 0.001) overall. Exclusively in PD, lower plasma serotonin was correlated with higher nigral iron (SNc: r(58) = - 0.501, p < 0.001). This correlation was significant even in patients newly diagnosed (< 1 year) and stronger in the SNc than any other region examined. This study reveals an early, linear association between low serotonin and higher nigral iron in PD patients, which is absent in controls. This is consistent with a serotonin-iron relationship in the disease process, warranting further studies to determine its cause and directionality.


Asunto(s)
Hierro/metabolismo , Enfermedad de Parkinson/metabolismo , Serotonina/sangre , Sustancia Negra/metabolismo , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad de Parkinson/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de Parkinson/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/farmacología , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Captación de Serotonina y Norepinefrina/metabolismo , Inhibidores de Captación de Serotonina y Norepinefrina/farmacología , Inhibidores de Captación de Serotonina y Norepinefrina/uso terapéutico , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Sustancia Negra/diagnóstico por imagen , Tiempo
5.
Pharmacol Res ; 174: 105921, 2021 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34601079

RESUMEN

Neurotoxicity is a frequent side effect of cisplatin (CisPt)-based anticancer therapy whose pathophysiology is largely vague. Here, we exploited C. elegans as a 3R-compliant in vivo model to elucidate molecular mechanisms contributing to CisPt-induced neuronal dysfunction. To this end, we monitored the impact of CisPt on various sensory functions as well as pharyngeal neurotransmission by recording electropharyngeograms (EPGs). CisPt neither affected food and odor sensation nor mechano-sensation, which involve dopaminergic and glutaminergic neurotransmission. However, CisPt reduced serotonin-regulated pharyngeal pumping activity independent of changes in the morphology of related neurons. CisPt-mediated alterations in EPGs were fully rescued by addition of serotonin (5-HT) (≤ 2 mM). Moreover, the CisPt-induced pharyngeal injury was prevented by co-incubation with the clinically approved serotonin re-uptake inhibitory drug duloxetine. A protective effect of 5-HT was also observed with respect to CisPt-mediated impairment of another 5-HT-dependent process, the egg laying activity. Importantly, CisPt-induced apoptosis in the gonad and learning disability were not influenced by 5-HT. Using different C. elegans mutants we found that CisPt-mediated (neuro)toxicity is independent of serotonin biosynthesis and re-uptake and likely involves serotonin-receptor subtype 7 (SER-7)-related functions. In conclusion, by measuring EPGs as a surrogate parameter of neuronal dysfunction, we provide first evidence that CisPt-induced neurotoxicity in C. elegans involves 5-HT-dependent neurotransmission and SER-7-mediated signaling mechanisms and can be prevented by the clinically approved antidepressant duloxetine. The data highlight the particular suitability of C. elegans as a 3R-conform in vivo model in molecular (neuro)toxicology and, moreover, for the pre-clinical identification of neuroprotective candidate drugs.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/toxicidad , Caenorhabditis elegans/efectos de los fármacos , Cisplatino/toxicidad , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Síndromes de Neurotoxicidad/metabolismo , Serotonina/metabolismo , Animales , Caenorhabditis elegans/metabolismo , Caenorhabditis elegans/fisiología , Proteínas de Caenorhabditis elegans/genética , Clorhidrato de Duloxetina/farmacología , Femenino , Regulación de la Expresión Génica/efectos de los fármacos , Síndromes de Neurotoxicidad/genética , Síndromes de Neurotoxicidad/fisiopatología , Faringe/efectos de los fármacos , Faringe/fisiología , Inhibidores de Captación de Serotonina y Norepinefrina/farmacología , Transmisión Sináptica/efectos de los fármacos
6.
Genes (Basel) ; 12(5)2021 04 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33946816

RESUMEN

Preclinical studies conducted to date suggest that depression could be elicited by the elevated expression of proinflammatory molecules: these play a key role in the mediation of neurochemical, neuroendocrine and behavioral changes. Thus, this study investigates the effect of chronic mild stress (CMS) and administration of venlafaxine (SSRI) on the expression and methylation status of new target inflammatory genes: TGFA, TGFB, IRF1, PTGS2 and IKBKB, in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PMBCs) and in selected brain structures of rats. Adult male Wistar rats were subjected to the CMS and further divided into matched subgroups to receive vehicle or venlafaxine. TaqMan gene expression assay and methylation-sensitive high-resolution melting (MS-HRM) were used to evaluate the expression of the genes and the methylation status of their promoters, respectively. Our results indicate that both CMS and chronic treatment with venlafaxine were associated with changes in expression of the studied genes and their promoter methylation status in PMBCs and the brain. Moreover, the effect of antidepressant administration clearly differed between brain structures. Summarizing, our results confirm at least a partial association between TGFA, TGFB, IRF1, PTGS2 and IKBKB and depressive disorders.


Asunto(s)
Encéfalo/metabolismo , Metilación de ADN , Leucocitos Mononucleares/metabolismo , Inhibidores de Captación de Serotonina y Norepinefrina/farmacología , Estrés Psicológico/genética , Transcriptoma , Clorhidrato de Venlafaxina/farmacología , Animales , Encéfalo/efectos de los fármacos , Ciclooxigenasa 2/genética , Ciclooxigenasa 2/metabolismo , Quinasa I-kappa B/genética , Quinasa I-kappa B/metabolismo , Factor 1 Regulador del Interferón/genética , Factor 1 Regulador del Interferón/metabolismo , Leucocitos Mononucleares/efectos de los fármacos , Masculino , Ratas , Ratas Wistar , Inhibidores de Captación de Serotonina y Norepinefrina/uso terapéutico , Estrés Psicológico/tratamiento farmacológico , Estrés Psicológico/metabolismo , Factor de Crecimiento Transformador beta/genética , Factor de Crecimiento Transformador beta/metabolismo , Clorhidrato de Venlafaxina/uso terapéutico
7.
J Pain ; 22(11): 1467-1476, 2021 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34023503

RESUMEN

Cognitive impairment associated with chronic pain remains relatively poorly understood. Use of analgesic drugs and often present co-morbidities in patients can preclude conclusions of causative relationships between chronic pain and cognitive deficits. Here, the impact of pain resulting from spinal nerve ligation (SNL) injury in rats on short and long-term memory was assessed in the novel object recognition task. To understand if chronic pain seizes the limited cognitive resources that are available at any given time, task difficulty was varied by using either very different (ie, easy task) or similar (ie, difficult task) pairs of objects. Nerve-injured, male rats exhibited no short or long-term memory deficits under easy task conditions. However, unlike sham-operated controls, injured rats showed deficits in both short and long-term memory by failing to differentiate similar objects in the difficult task version. In SNL rats, duloxetine produced anti-allodynic effects and ameliorated long-term memory deficits in the difficult task suggesting benefits of pain relief possibly complemented by noradrenergic mediated cognitive enhancement. Together these data suggest chronic pain reversibly takes up a significant amount of limited cognitive resources, leaving sufficient available for easy, but not difficult, tasks. PERSPECTIVE: Memory deficits in a rat model of chronic pain were only seen when the cognitive load was high, ie, in a difficult task. Acute treatment with duloxetine was sufficient to relieve memory deficits, suggesting chronic pain induces memory deficits by seizing limited cognitive resources to the detriment of task-related stimuli.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico , Disfunción Cognitiva , Clorhidrato de Duloxetina/farmacología , Neuralgia , Desempeño Psicomotor , Reconocimiento en Psicología , Inhibidores de Captación de Serotonina y Norepinefrina/farmacología , Animales , Dolor Crónico/complicaciones , Dolor Crónico/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Crónico/fisiopatología , Disfunción Cognitiva/tratamiento farmacológico , Disfunción Cognitiva/etiología , Disfunción Cognitiva/fisiopatología , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Clorhidrato de Duloxetina/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Neuralgia/complicaciones , Neuralgia/tratamiento farmacológico , Neuralgia/fisiopatología , Desempeño Psicomotor/efectos de los fármacos , Desempeño Psicomotor/fisiología , Ratas , Ratas Sprague-Dawley , Reconocimiento en Psicología/efectos de los fármacos , Reconocimiento en Psicología/fisiología , Inhibidores de Captación de Serotonina y Norepinefrina/administración & dosificación
8.
Neuroreport ; 32(9): 797-802, 2021 06 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33994525

RESUMEN

Antidepressants exert their analgesic effects by inhibiting the reuptake of noradrenaline. Several antidepressants have been shown to block the sodium channels, which might contribute to their analgesic potency. The aim of this study was to determine whether serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) could produce antinociceptive effects via sodium channel blockade using the veratrine test in mice. Furthermore, the effects of these agents on the veratrine test were examined to elucidate the effects of several antidepressants and tramadol on sodium channels. The administration of duloxetine (10 mg/kg) and venlafaxine (30 mg/kg) suppressed cuff-induced mechanical allodynia; however, these antinociceptive effects were only partially suppressed by atipamezole. Furthermore, duloxetine and venlafaxine demonstrated antinociceptive effects via sodium channel blockade, as assayed by the veratrine test. In addition, several antidepressants, including amitriptyline, paroxetine and mirtazapine, reduced veratrine-induced nociception. In contrast, milnacipran and tramadol did not alter the veratrine-induced nociception. These results indicated that, in addition to the primary action of SNRIs on monoamine transporters, sodium channel blockade might be involved in the antinociceptive activities of duloxetine and venlafaxine, but not milnacipran.


Asunto(s)
Clorhidrato de Duloxetina/farmacología , Hiperalgesia/tratamiento farmacológico , Neuralgia/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Captación de Serotonina y Norepinefrina/farmacología , Bloqueadores de los Canales de Sodio/farmacología , Clorhidrato de Venlafaxina/farmacología , Animales , Conducta Animal/efectos de los fármacos , Clorhidrato de Duloxetina/uso terapéutico , Hiperalgesia/metabolismo , Ratones , Neuralgia/metabolismo , Dimensión del Dolor , Inhibidores de Captación de Serotonina y Norepinefrina/uso terapéutico , Bloqueadores de los Canales de Sodio/uso terapéutico , Clorhidrato de Venlafaxina/uso terapéutico
9.
J Affect Disord ; 283: 472-479, 2021 03 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33516560

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Inadequate treatment response and emotional blunting are common challenges with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors/serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs/SNRIs) for major depressive disorder (MDD). We investigated the effectiveness of vortioxetine on emotional blunting in patients with partial response to treatment with SSRIs/SNRIs. METHODS: Patients with MDD who experienced a partial response to SSRI/SNRI monotherapy at adequate dose for ≥6 weeks were switched to 8 weeks of vortioxetine treatment 10-20 mg/day (Study NCT03835715). Key inclusion criteria were Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score >21 and <29, current major depressive episode <12 months, Oxford Depression Questionnaire (ODQ) total score ≥50, and confirmation of emotional blunting by standardized screening question. Emotional blunting was assessed by ODQ and depressive symptoms by MADRS. Other outcomes assessed included motivation and energy (Motivation and Energy Inventory [MEI]), cognitive performance (Digit Symbol Substitution Test [DSST]), and overall functioning (Sheehan Disability Scale [SDS]). RESULTS: At week 8, patients (N=143) had improved by -29.8 points (p<0.0001) in ODQ total score; 50% reported no emotional blunting in response to standardized screening question. Significant improvements were observed on the DSST, MEI, and SDS at all time points assessed, and 47% of patients were in remission (MADRS total score ≤10) at week 8. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events included nausea, headache, dizziness, vomiting, and diarrhea. LIMITATIONS: No prospective phase before medication switch. CONCLUSION: Vortioxetine 10-20 mg effectively improved emotional blunting, overall functioning, motivation and energy, cognitive performance, and depressive symptoms in patients with MDD with partial response to SSRI/SNRI therapy and emotional blunting.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo Mayor , Inhibidores de Captación de Serotonina y Norepinefrina , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/tratamiento farmacológico , Método Doble Ciego , Humanos , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/farmacología , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Captación de Serotonina y Norepinefrina/farmacología , Inhibidores de Captación de Serotonina y Norepinefrina/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vortioxetina
10.
J Psychiatry Neurosci ; 46(1): E88-E96, 2021 01 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33119493

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Late-life depression is often associated with non-response or relapse following conventional antidepressant treatment. The pathophysiology of late-life depression likely involves a complex interplay between aging and depression, and may include abnormalities in cortical inhibition and plasticity. However, the extent to which these cortical processes are modifiable by antidepressant pharmacotherapy is unknown. METHODS: Sixty-eight patients with late-life depression received 12 weeks of treatment with open-label venlafaxine, a serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (≤ 300 mg/d). We combined transcranial magnetic stimulation of the left motor cortex with electromyography recordings from the right hand to measure cortical inhibition using contralateral cortical silent period and paired-pulse short-interval intracortical inhibition paradigms; cortical facilitation using a paired-pulse intracortical facilitation paradigm; and short-term cortical plasticity using a paired associative stimulation paradigm. All measures were collected at baseline, 1 week into treatment (n = 23) and after approximately 12 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: Venlafaxine did not significantly alter cortical inhibition, facilitation or plasticity after 1 or 12 weeks of treatment. Improvements in depressive symptoms during treatment were not associated with changes in cortical physiology. LIMITATIONS: The results presented here are specific to the motor cortex. Future work should investigate whether these findings extend to cortical areas more closely associated with depression, such as the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that antidepressant treatment with venlafaxine does not exert meaningful changes in motor cortical inhibition or plasticity in late-life depression. The absence of changes in motor cortical physiology, alongside improvements in depressive symptoms, suggests that age-related changes may play a role in previously identified abnormalities in motor cortical processes in latelife depression, and that venlafaxine treatment does not target these abnormalities.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/fisiopatología , Potenciales Evocados Motores , Corteza Motora , Inhibición Neural , Plasticidad Neuronal , Inhibidores de Captación de Serotonina y Norepinefrina/farmacología , Estimulación Magnética Transcraneal , Clorhidrato de Venlafaxina/farmacología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estimulación Eléctrica , Electromiografía , Potenciales Evocados Motores/efectos de los fármacos , Potenciales Evocados Motores/fisiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Corteza Motora/efectos de los fármacos , Corteza Motora/fisiopatología , Inhibición Neural/efectos de los fármacos , Inhibición Neural/fisiología , Plasticidad Neuronal/efectos de los fármacos , Plasticidad Neuronal/fisiología , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Inhibidores de Captación de Serotonina y Norepinefrina/administración & dosificación , Clorhidrato de Venlafaxina/administración & dosificación
11.
Inflammopharmacology ; 29(1): 75-90, 2021 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33164143

RESUMEN

RATIONALE: Depression has the topmost prevalence of all psychiatric diseases. It is characterized by a high recurrence rate, disability, and numerous and mostly unclear pathogenic mechanisms. Besides the monoamine or the neurotrophic hypothesis of depression, the inflammatory mechanism has begun to be supported by more and more evidence. At the same time, the current knowledge about the standard treatment of choice, the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), is expanding rapidly, adding more features to the initial ones. OBJECTIVES: This review summarizes the in vivo anti-inflammatory effects of SSRIs and SNRIs in the treatment of depression and outlines the particular mechanisms of these effects for each drug separately. In addition, we provide an overview of the inflammation-related theory of depression and the underlying mechanisms. RESULTS: SSRIs and SNRIs decrease the neuroinflammation through multiple mechanisms including the reduction of blood or tissue cytokines or regulating complex inflammatory pathways: nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB), inflammasomes, Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ). Also, SSRIs and SNRIs show these effects in association with an antidepressant action. CONCLUSIONS: SSRIs and SNRIs have an anti-neuroinflammatory role which might contribute the antidepressant effect.


Asunto(s)
Antiinflamatorios/farmacología , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/farmacología , Inhibidores de Captación de Serotonina y Norepinefrina/farmacología , Animales , Depresión/tratamiento farmacológico , Depresión/fisiopatología , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Humanos , Inflamación/tratamiento farmacológico , Inflamación/fisiopatología , Roedores
12.
Clin Nucl Med ; 46(4): 329-331, 2021 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33315681

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT: 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy is used to differentiate Lewy body disease from other neurodegenerative disorders. We identified 2 cases with remarkably changed pulmonary uptake between 2 metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphies; pulmonary uptake was reduced when patients were taking selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor/serotonin noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor and preserved during the medication-naive or withdrawal state, suggesting that pulmonary uptake involves not only the noradrenaline transporter, but also the serotonin transporter. Pulmonary accumulation may affect the heart-to-mediastinum ratio as the region of interest on the planner image is usually placed on the heart and includes part of the lung. Therefore, we should pay attention to the medication state of patients with decreased pulmonary uptake.


Asunto(s)
3-Yodobencilguanidina/metabolismo , Pulmón/efectos de los fármacos , Pulmón/metabolismo , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/farmacología , Inhibidores de Captación de Serotonina y Norepinefrina/farmacología , Transporte Biológico/efectos de los fármacos , Femenino , Humanos , Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cintigrafía
13.
Behav Brain Res ; 398: 112944, 2021 02 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33017639

RESUMEN

Preclinical studies suggest that stress-related disorders even prior gestation can cause long-term changes at the level of neurobehavioral adaptations. Therefore, it is critical to consider undergoing antidepressant therapy which could reverse the negative consequences in the offspring. Venlafaxine is widely used in clinical practice; however insufficient amount of well-controlled studies verified the safety of venlafaxine therapy during gestation and lactation. The aim of this work was to investigate the effects of perinatal venlafaxine therapy on selected neurobehavioral variables in mothers and their female offspring using a model of maternal adversity. Pre-gestational stressed and non-stressed Wistar rat dams were treated with either venlafaxine (10 mg/kg/day) or vehicle during pregnancy and lactation. We have shown that pre-gestational stress decreased the number of pups with a significant reduction in the number of males but not females. Furthermore, we found that offspring of stressed and treated mothers exhibited anxiogenic behavior in juvenile and adolescent age. However, during adulthood pre-gestational stress significantly increased anxiety-like behavior of female, with venlafaxine treatment normalizing the state to control levels. Additionally, we found that even maternal stress prior gestation can have long-term impact on adult number of hippocampal immature neurons of the female offspring. A number of questions related to the best treatment options for maternal depression still remains, however present data may provide greater insight into the possible outcomes associated with perinatal venlafaxine therapy.


Asunto(s)
Ansiedad/etiología , Hipocampo/crecimiento & desarrollo , Conducta Materna/efectos de los fármacos , Aprendizaje por Laberinto/efectos de los fármacos , Efectos Tardíos de la Exposición Prenatal/etiología , Inhibidores de Captación de Serotonina y Norepinefrina/farmacología , Estrés Psicológico/tratamiento farmacológico , Clorhidrato de Venlafaxina/farmacología , Animales , Conducta Animal/efectos de los fármacos , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Femenino , Lactancia , Periodo Posparto , Embarazo , Efectos Tardíos de la Exposición Prenatal/inducido químicamente , Ratas , Ratas Wistar , Inhibidores de Captación de Serotonina y Norepinefrina/administración & dosificación , Factores Sexuales , Clorhidrato de Venlafaxina/administración & dosificación
14.
J Psychopharmacol ; 34(12): 1342-1349, 2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33143538

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of evidence to guide treatment of comorbid depression and anxiety. Preliminary evidence suggests mirtazapine may be effective in treating patients with both depression and anxiety symptoms. METHODS: We undertook a secondary analysis of mirtazapine (MIR): a placebo-controlled trial of the addition of mirtazapine to a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor or serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor in treatment-resistant depression (TRD) in primary care. We subdivided participants into three groups by baseline generalized anxiety disorder score (GAD-7): severe (GAD-7 ⩾ 16), moderate (GAD-7 = 11-15), no/mild (GAD-7 ⩽ 10). We used linear regression including likelihood-ratio testing of interaction terms to assess how baseline anxiety altered the response of participants to mirtazapine as measured by 12-week GAD-7 and Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II) scores. RESULTS: Baseline generalized anxiety moderated mirtazapine's effect as measured by GAD-7 (p = 0.041) and BDI-II (p = 0.088) at 12 weeks. Participants with severe generalized anxiety receiving mirtazapine had lower 12-week GAD-7 score (adjusted difference between means (ADM) -2.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.69 to -4.95) and larger decreases in BDI-II score (ADM -6.36, 95% CI -1.60 to -10.84) than placebo. Conversely, there was no anxiolytic benefit (ADM 0.28, 95% CI -1.05 to 1.60) or antidepressant benefit (ADM -0.17, 95% CI -3.02 to 2.68) compared with placebo in those with no/mild generalized anxiety. CONCLUSIONS: These findings extend the evidence for the effectiveness of mirtazapine to reduce generalized anxiety in TRD in primary care. These results may inform targeted prescribing in depression based on concurrent anxiety symptoms, although these conclusions are constrained by the post-hoc nature of this analysis.


Asunto(s)
Ansiolíticos/farmacología , Trastornos de Ansiedad/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastorno Depresivo Resistente al Tratamiento/tratamiento farmacológico , Mirtazapina/farmacología , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/farmacología , Inhibidores de Captación de Serotonina y Norepinefrina/farmacología , Adulto , Anciano , Ansiolíticos/administración & dosificación , Trastornos de Ansiedad/epidemiología , Comorbilidad , Interpretación Estadística de Datos , Trastorno Depresivo Resistente al Tratamiento/epidemiología , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mirtazapina/administración & dosificación , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Atención Primaria de Salud , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Captación de Serotonina y Norepinefrina/administración & dosificación
15.
J Clin Psychiatry ; 81(6)2020 10 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33113596

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Current pharmacologic treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) have shown limited efficacy, prompting a call to investigate new classes of medications. The current study investigated the efficacy of glutamate modulation with riluzole augmentation for combat-related PTSD symptoms resistant to treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs). METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel trial was conducted at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center and Syracuse VA Medical Center between December 2013 and November 2017. Veterans and active duty service members with combat-related PTSD (per the Clinician Administered PTSD Scale [CAPS]) who were not responsive to SSRI or SNRI pharmacotherapy were randomized to 8-week augmentation with a starting dose of 100 mg/d of riluzole (n = 36) or placebo (n = 38) and assessed weekly for PTSD symptoms, anxiety, depression, disability, and side effects. RESULTS: Intent-to-treat analyses (N = 74) of the primary outcome (CAPS for DSM-IV) showed no significant between-group difference in change in overall PTSD symptoms (F = 0.64, P = .422), with a small effect size (d = 0.25). There was clinically significant within-group improvement in overall PTSD symptoms in both groups, with a greater mean (SD) decrease in CAPS score in the riluzole group (-21.1 [18.9]) than in the placebo group (-16.7 [17.2]). Exploratory analyses of PTSD symptom clusters showed significantly greater improvement on hyperarousal symptoms in the riluzole group as measured by the PTSD Checklist-Specific-Subscale D (d = 0.48) and near-significant findings on the CAPS Subscale D. Riluzole augmentation was not superior to placebo on change in depression, anxiety, or disability severity. CONCLUSIONS: Although preliminary, the exploratory findings of this study offer some evidence that riluzole augmentation of an SSRI or SNRI may selectively improve PTSD hyperarousal symptoms without changes in overall PTSD symptoms, depression, anxiety, or disability. Additional investigation of the mechanism of the efficacy of riluzole for hyperarousal symptoms is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02155829.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Aminoácidos Excitadores/farmacología , Riluzol/farmacología , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/farmacología , Inhibidores de Captación de Serotonina y Norepinefrina/farmacología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/fisiopatología , Adulto , Ansiedad/tratamiento farmacológico , Depresión/tratamiento farmacológico , Método Doble Ciego , Sinergismo Farmacológico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Antagonistas de Aminoácidos Excitadores/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Personal Militar , Riluzol/administración & dosificación , Veteranos
16.
Toxins (Basel) ; 12(10)2020 09 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32998357

RESUMEN

Paclitaxel, a primary chemotherapeutic agent used to treat numerous solid malignancies, is commonly associated with debilitating peripheral neuropathy. However, a satisfactory gold-standard monotherapy for this neuropathic pain is not currently available. A combination strategy of two or more medications with different properties may achieve more beneficial effects than monotherapy. Thus, we investigated the analgesic efficacies and spinal mechanisms of the combination strategy, including bee venom acupuncture (BVA) and venlafaxine (VLX) against paclitaxel-induced allodynia in mice. Four intraperitoneal infusions of paclitaxel on alternating days (2 mg/kg/day) induced cold and mechanical allodynia for at least 1 week as assessed using acetone and the von Frey hair test, respectively. Co-treatment of BVA (1.0 mg/kg, s.c., ST36) with VLX (40 mg/kg, i.p.) at the medium dose produced a longer-lasting and additive effect than each monotherapy at the highest dose (BVA, 2.5 mg/kg; VLX, 60 mg/kg). Spinal pre-administration of idazoxan (α2-adrenergic receptor antagonist, 10 µg), methysergide (mixed 5-HT1/5-HT2 receptor antagonist, 10 µg), or MDL-72222 (5-HT3 receptor antagonist, 10 µg) abolished this analgesia. These results suggest that the combination therapy with BVA and VLX produces long-lasting and additive analgesic effects on paclitaxel-induced allodynia, via the spinal noradrenergic and serotonergic mechanism, providing a promising clinical strategy.


Asunto(s)
Terapia por Acupuntura , Analgésicos/farmacología , Venenos de Abeja/administración & dosificación , Hiperalgesia/terapia , Umbral del Dolor/efectos de los fármacos , Inhibidores de Captación de Serotonina y Norepinefrina/farmacología , Médula Espinal/efectos de los fármacos , Clorhidrato de Venlafaxina/farmacología , Animales , Terapia Combinada , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Hiperalgesia/inducido químicamente , Hiperalgesia/metabolismo , Hiperalgesia/fisiopatología , Masculino , Ratones Endogámicos C57BL , Paclitaxel , Médula Espinal/metabolismo , Médula Espinal/fisiopatología
17.
J Clin Psychiatry ; 81(6)2020 10 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33049805

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Fluoxetine, paroxetine, sertraline, topiramate, and venlafaxine have previously shown efficacy for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). One prior study using US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) medical records data to compare these agents found no differences in symptom reduction in clinical practice. The current study addresses several weaknesses in that study, including limited standardization of treatment duration, inability to account for prior treatment receipt, use of an outdated symptomatic assessment for PTSD, and lack of functional outcome. METHODS: A total of 834 VA outpatients were identified with DSM-5 clinical diagnoses of PTSD between October 2016 and March 2018 who initiated one of the medications and met prespecified criteria for treatment duration and dose, combined with baseline and endpoint DSM-5 PTSD Checklist (PCL-5) measurements. Twelve-week acute-phase changes in PCL-5 score and remission of PTSD symptoms were compared among patients receiving the different medications, as was use of acute psychiatric services in the subsequent 6-month continuation phase. RESULTS: In the acute phase, patients improved by a mean of 6.8-10.1 points on the PCL-5 and 0.0%-10.9% achieved remission of PTSD symptoms. Those taking venlafaxine were significantly more likely to achieve remission (P = .008 vs fluoxetine and P < .0001 vs paroxetine, sertraline, and topiramate). In the continuation phase, there were no differences in acute psychiatric care use between medications. Those who continued their medication were less likely to use acute psychiatric services (HR = 0.55; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: There may be an advantage to venlafaxine over other agents in achieving acute-phase remission for DSM-5 PTSD in routine clinical practice, but this finding requires further study. Regardless of the agent chosen, medication cessation during the continuation phase is associated with a higher risk of acute psychiatric care use.


Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de Anhidrasa Carbónica/farmacología , Fluoxetina/farmacología , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Paroxetina/farmacología , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/farmacología , Inhibidores de Captación de Serotonina y Norepinefrina/farmacología , Sertralina/farmacología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/tratamiento farmacológico , Topiramato/farmacología , Clorhidrato de Venlafaxina/farmacología , Enfermedad Aguda , Adulto , Inhibidores de Anhidrasa Carbónica/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Fluoxetina/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Masculino , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Paroxetina/administración & dosificación , Inducción de Remisión , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Captación de Serotonina y Norepinefrina/administración & dosificación , Sertralina/administración & dosificación , Topiramato/administración & dosificación , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Clorhidrato de Venlafaxina/administración & dosificación
18.
J Psychopharmacol ; 34(12): 1335-1341, 2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32900262

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Efforts to develop less heterogeneous, more clinically useful diagnostic categories for depressive disorders include renewed interest in the concept of melancholia (Mel). However, clinical or biological differentiation of Mel from other (nonMel) episodes of depression has been questioned, and it remains unclear whether pharmacological responses proposed to be characteristic of Mel are supported by available research. METHODS: We carried out a systematic review seeking treatment trials reports comparing Mel and nonMel depressed subjects for meta-analyses of their differences in responses (a) to antidepressants overall, (b) to tricyclic (TCAs) or serotonin-enhancing agents (serotonin reuptake inhibitors/serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors) and (c) with placebo treatment. RESULTS: We identified 25 trials in 16 reports comparing 2597 Mel with 5016 nonMel subjects. Overall, responses to antidepressant treatment did not differ between Mel (39.4%) and nonMel (42.2%) subjects. However, all subjects responded better to TCAs (50.6%) than SRIs (30.0%; p<0.0001). Mel subjects also responded less well with placebo, but also were significantly more severely depressed at intake. CONCLUSIONS: Antidepressant responses were similar in Mel and nonMel depressed patients. Mel subjects responded 25% less with placebo but were more severely depressed initially, and there was preferential response to TCAs in both Mel and nonMel subjects. The findings provide little support for proposed differences in responses to particular treatments among Mel versus nonMel depressed patients, and underscore the need to match for illness severity in making such comparisons.


Asunto(s)
Antidepresivos Tricíclicos/farmacología , Trastorno Depresivo/tratamiento farmacológico , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/farmacología , Inhibidores de Captación de Serotonina y Norepinefrina/farmacología , Humanos
19.
J Parkinsons Dis ; 10(4): 1751-1761, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32804101

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Many patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) experience depression. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate pimavanserin treatment for depression in patients with PD. METHODS: Pimavanserin was administered as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy to a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor or serotonin/noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor in this 8-week, single-arm, open-label phase 2 study (NCT03482882). The primary endpoint was change from baseline to week 8 in Hamilton Depression Scale-17-item version (HAMD-17) score. Safety, including collection of adverse events and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III (MDS-UPDRS III) scores, was assessed in patients who received ≥1 pimavanserin dose. RESULTS: Efficacy was evaluated in 45 patients (21 monotherapy, 24 adjunctive therapy). Mean (SE) baseline HAMD-17 was 19.2 (3.1). Change from baseline to week 8 (least squares [LS] mean [SE]) in the HAMD-17 was -10.8 (0.63) (95% CI, -12.0 to -9.5; p < 0.0001) with significant improvement seen at week 2 (p < 0.0001) and for both monotherapy (week 8, -11.2 [0.99]) and adjunctive therapy (week 8,-10.2 [0.78]). Most patients (60.0%) had ≥50% improvement at week 8, and 44.4% of patients reached remission (HAMD-17 score ≤7). Twenty-one of 47 patients experienced 42 treatment-emergent adverse events; the most common by system organ class were gastrointestinal (n = 7; 14.9%) and psychiatric (n = 7; 14.9%). No negative effects were observed on MMSE or MDS-UPDRS Part III. CONCLUSION: In this 8-week, single-arm, open-label study, pimavanserin as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy was well tolerated and associated with early and sustained improvement of depressive symptoms in patients with PD.


Asunto(s)
Depresión/tratamiento farmacológico , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Enfermedad de Parkinson/tratamiento farmacológico , Piperidinas/farmacología , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/farmacología , Antagonistas del Receptor de Serotonina 5-HT2/farmacología , Inhibidores de Captación de Serotonina y Norepinefrina/farmacología , Urea/análogos & derivados , Anciano , Depresión/etiología , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad de Parkinson/complicaciones , Piperidinas/administración & dosificación , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Antagonistas del Receptor de Serotonina 5-HT2/administración & dosificación , Antagonistas del Receptor de Serotonina 5-HT2/efectos adversos , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Captación de Serotonina y Norepinefrina/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Captación de Serotonina y Norepinefrina/efectos adversos , Urea/administración & dosificación , Urea/efectos adversos , Urea/farmacología
20.
Eur J Pharmacol ; 883: 173319, 2020 Sep 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32619678

RESUMEN

The roles of serotonin and noradrenaline in the modulation of chronic pruriceptive processing currently remain unclear. To clarify the contribution of serotonin and noradrenaline to chronic itch, the effects of the administration of antidepressants or noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors were evaluated in the present study. A pretreatment with milnacipran, a serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor, and mirtazapine, a noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressant, attenuated the induction of spontaneous scratching behavior in mice with chronic itch. The administration of a serotonin reuptake inhibitor, such as fluvoxamine and paroxetine, but not escitalopram, or a noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor, such as atomoxetine and nisoxetine, ameliorated the induction of spontaneous scratching behavior in mice with chronic itch. Furthermore, this attenuation was reversed by the administration of yohimbine, a selective α2-adrenoceptor antagonist, or methysergide, a non-selective serotonin receptor antagonist. These results suggest that elevated serotonin and noradrenaline levels are involved in the attenuation of scratching behavior induced by chronic itch, and serotonin receptors and an α2-adrenoceptor play a crucial role in chronic pruriceptive processing.


Asunto(s)
Antipruriginosos/farmacología , Sistema Nervioso Central/efectos de los fármacos , Norepinefrina/metabolismo , Prurito/metabolismo , Serotonina/metabolismo , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos/farmacología , Inhibidores de Captación Adrenérgica/farmacología , Animales , Antipruriginosos/administración & dosificación , Conducta Animal/efectos de los fármacos , Sistema Nervioso Central/metabolismo , Sistema Nervioso Central/fisiopatología , Enfermedad Crónica , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Inyecciones Espinales , Masculino , Ratones Endogámicos C57BL , Prurito/tratamiento farmacológico , Prurito/fisiopatología , Prurito/psicología , Antagonistas de la Serotonina/farmacología , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/farmacología , Inhibidores de Captación de Serotonina y Norepinefrina/farmacología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...