Inotuzumab in Older Patients with Newly Diagnosed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia-A Podcast.

Older patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) have historically had poor outcomes (5-year survival rate, 20%) with standard intensive and dose-adjusted chemotherapy regimens, due to a high incidence of adverse biologic features including high-risk cytogenetics, presence of TP53 mutations, and poor tolerance to intensive therapy. Thus, there is an unmet medical need in this patient population. Inotuzumab ozogamicin is a humanized antibody-drug conjugate that targets CD22-positive leukemic blasts. It is approved for the treatment of relapsed or refractory ALL and has been shown to be effective and tolerable in older patients. Several ongoing trials in older patients with newly diagnosed ALL have yielded encouraging data with inotuzumab ozogamicin in induction alone and in combination with low-intensity chemotherapy. In this podcast, the authors summarize and highlight some of the recent findings on the use of inotuzumab ozogamicin as induction therapy for older adults with newly diagnosed ALL.

Dose-Dense Mini-Hyper-CVD, Inotuzumab Ozogamicin and Blinatumomab Achieves Rapid MRD-Negativity in Philadelphia Chromosome-Negative B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.

BACKGROUND: The combination of low-intensity chemotherapy and inotuzumab ozogamicin (INO), with sequential blinatumomab, is highly effective in older adults with newly diagnosed B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and in relapsed or refractory B-cell ALL. Earlier, "dose-dense" administration of blinatumomab could lead to earlier and deeper measurable residual disease (MRD) responses and better outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of the safety and efficacy of a dose-dense regimen of mini-hyper-CVD (mini-hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and dexamethasone alternating with mini-methotrexate and cytarabine), INO, and blinatumomab in patients with B-cell ALL. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were treated (frontline, n = 9; MRD consolidation, n = 4; relapsed/refractory, n = 8). In the frontline cohort, all patients achieved CR/CRi and MRD negativity by flow cytometry at the end of cycle 1. Across the frontline and MRD consolidation cohorts, 10/11 patients (91%) achieved next-generation sequencing MRD negativity at a sensitivity of 10-6, including 6/10 evaluable patients (60%) who achieved next-generation sequencing MRD negativity after cycle 1. The CR/CRi rate in the relapsed/refractory cohort was 63%, and all responders achieved MRD negativity by flow cytometry at the end of cycle 1. The 1-year overall survival rate for the combined cohort of the frontline and MRD-positive patients was 83%. No new safety signals were observed with the dose-dense mini-hyper-CVD, INO, and blinatumomab regimen. CONCLUSION: Dose-dense delivery of mini-hyper-CVD, INO, and blinatumomab was safe and resulted in rapid and deep MRD negativity in patients with B-cell ALL. This regimen is now being prospectively evaluated in both the frontline and relapsed/refractory settings.

Time to First Subsequent Salvage Therapy in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Treated With Inotuzumab Ozogamicin in the Phase III INO-VATE Trial.

BACKGROUND: In relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R ALL), successive salvage therapies may worsen outcomes and decrease quality of life. This post hoc analysis of the phase III INO-VATE trial investigates subsequent salvage therapies and compared the time from randomization to first subsequent salvage therapy (TST) in the inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) and standard-of-care chemotherapy (SoC) arms. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adults (aged ≥18 years) with CD22+ R/R ALL were randomized to InO (n = 164) or SoC (n = 162) treatment. We determined TST and proportion of patients receiving subsequent salvage therapies by treatment arm and for subgroups based on transplantation status and baseline characteristics. RESULTS: In the InO versus SoC arm, a smaller proportion of patients received subsequent salvage therapy (34.1% [n = 56] vs. 56.8% [n = 92]), and TST was longer (median 19 vs. 4 months, hazard ratio 0.339, P < .0001). Similar benefits were seen with InO versus SoC irrespective of transplantation status, age, salvage phase, first remission duration, Philadelphia chromosome status, or CD22 expression. Following receipt of subsequent salvage therapy, median overall survival was 4 months, irrespective of treatment arm. CONCLUSION: Patients in the InO versus SoC arm were less likely to receive subsequent salvage therapy, and showed a clinically meaningful extension of TST irrespective of subgroup. This suggests InO treatment leads to improved outcomes by increasing the likelihood that subsequent salvage therapies and their associated adverse impacts can be delayed or avoided. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Available in Supplementary Materials. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01564784.

Inotuzumab ozogamicin with bosutinib for relapsed or refractory Philadelphia chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia or lymphoid blast phase of chronic myeloid leukemia.

Relapsed/refractory (R/R) Philadelphia chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph + ALL) and lymphoid blast phase of chronic myeloid leukemia (LBP-CML) have poor outcomes. We designed a phase 1/2 study combining inotuzumab ozogamicin with bosutinib for this patient population. Patients with T315I mutation were excluded. Bosutinib was administered daily at three dose levels (300 mg/d, 400 mg/d, 500 mg/d) in a 3 + 3 design. Inotuzumab ozogamicin was dosed weekly during cycle one, and once every 4 weeks subsequently for a total of six cycles. The primary objective was to determine the safety and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of bosutinib in combination with inotuzumab ozogamicin. Eighteen patients were enrolled (Ph-positive ALL, n = 16; LBP-CML, n = 2). The median age was 62 years (range, 19-74) and the median number of prior therapies was one (range, 1-5). Dose limiting toxicities included grade 3 skin rash and bosutinib 400 mg daily was determined as the MTD. The most frequent grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events were thrombocytopenia (60%) and neutropenia (38%). A complete response (CR) / CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi) was achieved in 15/18 (83%) patients; 11/18 (61%) patients achieved negative measurable residual disease by flow cytometry. Complete molecular response was noted in 10/18 (56%) patients. The 30-day mortality was 0%. After a median follow-up of 44 months, the median duration of response and overall survival were 7.7 months and 13.5 months, respectively. Six patients had a subsequent allogeneic stem cell transplant. No patient developed veno-occlusive disease. Inotuzumab ozogamicin with bosutinib was well tolerated in R/R Ph-positive ALL and LBP-CML.

Venetoclax and dexamethasone synergize with inotuzumab ozogamicin-induced DNA damage signaling in B-lineage ALL.

Adult patients with relapsed B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL) have a dismal prognosis. To improve pharmacotherapy, we analyzed induction of apoptosis by venetoclax and inotuzumab ozogamicin in terms of cytotoxicity and mode of action. Flow cytometry-based analyses of mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization (MOMP) and ataxia telangiectasia mutated activation demonstrate rapid induction of MOMP by venetoclax and DNA damage signaling by inotuzumab ozogamicin, respectively. In primary ALL samples and patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models, venetoclax and inotuzumab ozogamicin cooperated and synergized in combination with dexamethasone in vitro in all tested samples of ALL. In murine PDX models, inotuzumab ozogamicin, but not venetoclax, induced complete remission in a dose-dependent manner but constantly failed to achieve relapse-free survival. In contrast, combination therapy with venetoclax, dexamethasone, and inotuzumab ozogamicin induced long-term leukemia-free survival and treatment-free survival in all 3 ALL-PDX models tested. These data demonstrate synergistic and highly efficient pharmacotherapy in preclinical models that qualify for evaluation in clinical trials.

Role of blinatumomab, inotuzumab, and CAR T-cells: Which to choose and how to sequence for patients with relapsed disease.

Recent approval of several novel agents has dramatically improved outcomes for patients with relapsed and refractory (R/R) B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blinatumomab, a bi-specific T-cell engager targeted to CD3 and CD19, inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO), an antibody-drug conjugate to CD22, and tisagenlecleucel, a CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell with a 4-1BB costimulatory domain, have all demonstrated impressive response rates in R/R B-ALL as compared to historic controls. However, important considerations when choosing among these novel agents include clinical features that may impact efficacy, such as relative disease burden, antigen expression, and T-cell function, as well as patient and disease characteristics that may contribute to risk of toxicity. In addition, suitability of the patient for hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) as well as patient preference must also be considered. This review will focus on factors to weigh when choosing an agent in the setting of R/R disease and important challenges moving forward.

Blinatumomab or Inotuzumab Ozogamicin as Bridge to Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Relapsed or Refractory B-lineage Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Retrospective Single-Center Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Blinatumomab and inotuzumab ozogamicin are now widely used to treat relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (r/r B-ALL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We have reported the clinical course of 34 adult patients with r/r B-ALL receiving blinatumomab or inotuzumab ozogamicin at our institution from 2009 to 2019. RESULTS: Blinatumomab-based salvage therapy was applied for overt r/r B-ALL (n = 13) or minimal residual disease (MRD) positivity (n = 5). Of the 13 patients with r/r B-ALL, 9 (69%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 39%-91%) achieved complete remission (CR), with 78% of CR patients (95% CI, 40%-97%) reaching MRD negativity. MRD negativity was also achieved in all 5 patients treated for MRD positivity. The 1-year overall survival of patients receiving blinatumomab for r/r B-ALL and MRD positivity was 54% (n = 13; 95% CI, 26%-81%) and 80% (n = 5; 95% CI, 44-100), respectively. In the inotuzumab ozogamicin group, all 16 patients were treated for overt r/r B-ALL. The rate of CR was 94% (95% CI, 70%-100%), with 67% (95% CI, 38%-88%) of CR patients reaching MRD negativity. The 1-year OS after the first application of inotuzumab ozogamicin was 46% (95% CI, 18%-74%). Of those patients receiving blinatumomab and inotuzumab ozogamicin as a bridge-to-transplant strategy, 79% and 80%, respectively, proceeded to allogeneic stem cell transplantation. The most frequent drug-specific adverse events were similar to those previously reported, including cytokine release syndrome, capillary leak syndrome, and neurotoxicity for blinatumomab and transplant-associated veno-occlusive disease of the liver for inotuzumab ozogamicin. CONCLUSION: Together with previous observations from phase III clinical trials, these data suggest that blinatumomab and inotuzumab ozogamicin are highly effective salvage regimens in r/r B-ALL.

Real-World Outcomes of Adult B-Cell Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia Patients Treated With Inotuzumab Ozogamicin.

BACKGROUND: Inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) is an anti-CD22 monoclonal antibody-drug (calicheamicin) conjugate that has shown superior efficacy compared to conventional chemotherapy in relapsed/refractory (RR) B-cell acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) patients. We sought to find the safety and efficacy of InO in a real-world setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A multicenter cohort analysis on 84 RR ALL patients who received InO outside of clinical trials was conducted to evaluate response and toxicity. RESULTS: The median (range) age of patients at InO initiation was 50 (20-87) years. Forty patients (48%) had ≥ 3 therapies and 23 patients (27%) underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (allo-HCT) before InO. The median (range) number of cycles of InO provided was 2 (1-6), and cumulative dose was 3.3 (1.8-9.3) mg/m2. Overall response rate (complete remission/complete remission with incomplete count recovery) was 63%; 44% had complete remission with minimal residual disease negativity. Twenty-three patients (27%) with response received allo-HCT. The median duration of response was 11.5 months and when censored at allo-HCT was not reached (51% in remission at 2 years). The median overall survival after InO was 11.6 months and when censored at time of allo-HCT was 13.6 months. The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events observed were transaminitis (16%), hyperbilirubinemia (5%), bleeding (4%), veno-occlusive disease (2%), and hyperglycemia (2%). In multivariate analysis, allo-HCT after InO did not retain favorable significance for duration of response (hazard ratio = 1.27; 95% confidence interval, 0.89-1.61; P = .2) or overall survival (hazard ratio = 1.10; 95% confidence interval, 0.37-3.25; P = .85). CONCLUSION: InO was well tolerated and had significant efficacy in RR B-cell ALL patients.

Inotuzumab ozogamicin in combination with low-intensity chemotherapy (mini-HCVD) with or without blinatumomab versus standard intensive chemotherapy (HCVAD) as frontline therapy for older patients with Philadelphia chromosome-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A propensity score analysis.

BACKGROUND: The outcome of older patients with newly diagnosed, Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is poor. The combination of targeted therapy with low-intensity chemotherapy is safe and effective. The objective of the current analysis was to compare the outcome of patients who received a combination of inotuzumab ozogamicin plus low-intensity chemotherapy (mini-hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and dexamethasone [mini-HCVD]) with or without blinatumomab versus the outcome of those who received the standard, intensive, hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (HCVAD) regimen. METHODS: The authors analyzed 135 older patients with newly diagnosed, Ph-negative ALL who were treated prospectively with standard HCVAD (n = 77) or with the combination of inotuzumab ozogamicin plus mini-HCVD with or without blinatumomab (n = 58). A propensity score analysis was conducted using 1:1 matching using the nearest neighbor matching method. RESULTS: Propensity score matching identified 38 patients in each cohort. The antibody plus low-intensity chemotherapy combination induced higher response rates (98% vs 88%), with lower rates of early death (0% vs 8%) and lower rates of death in complete remission (5% vs 17%). With propensity score matching, the 3-year event-free survival rates for patients who received HCVAD and those who received the combination of inotuzumab ozogamicin plus mini-HCVD with or without blinatumomab were 34% and 64%, respectively (P = .003), and the 3-year overall survival rates were 34% and 63%, respectively (P = .004). By multivariate analysis, age (P = .019; hazard ratio, 1.045) and the combination of inotuzumab plus mini-HCVD with or without blinatumomab (P = .020; hazard ratio, 0.550) were identified as independent prognostic factors for survival. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of inotuzumab ozogamicin plus mini-HCVD with or without blinatumomab is safe and effective in older patients with newly diagnosed, Ph-negative ALL and confers a better outcome compared with standard HCVAD chemotherapy.

Inotuzumab: from preclinical development to success in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) is a recently US Food and Drug Administration-approved antibody-drug conjugate for the treatment of relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). InO consists of a CD22-targeting immunoglobulin G4 humanized monoclonal antibody conjugated to calicheamicin. Although initially developed for the treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) because of activity in preclinical models and high response rates in indolent lymphomas, a phase 3 trial was negative and further development focused on CD22+ ALL. Although results in NHL were disappointing, parallel testing in early-phase trials of CD22+ ALL demonstrated feasibility and efficacy. Subsequently, the randomized phase 3 Study Of Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Versus Investigator's Choice Of Chemotherapy In Patients With Relapsed Or Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia trial showed that InO was superior to standard of care regimens with a significantly improved complete remission (CR) rate in patients with relapsed/refractory disease (80.7% vs 29.4%, P < .001). Patients achieving CR with InO also had a significantly higher rate of undetectable minimal residual disease compared with chemotherapy (78.4% vs 28.1%, P < .001). InO-specific side effects, including veno-occlusive disease, have been an ongoing area of concern, and consensus guidelines for minimizing toxicities are now available. Ongoing trials are investigating the combination of InO with other agents in the relapse setting and the addition of InO to frontline therapy. This review details the preclinical and clinical development of InO, focusing on how best to use it and future directions for further development.