[Long-term Efficacy and Safety of Sampeginterferon-ß1a in the Treatment of Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: a Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial 104-Week Results]. / Dolgosrochnye dannye po effektivnosti i bezopasnosti preparata sampeginterferon-ß1a u patsientov s remittiruyushchim rasseyannym sklerozom: rezul'taty 104-nedel'nogo randomizirovannogo dvoinogo slepogo klinicheskogo issledovaniya.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of sampeginterferon-ß1a (samPEG-IFN-ß1a) 180 µg and 240 µg administered once every 2 weeks compared to placebo and low dose interferon beta-1a (LIB) 30 µg administered once weekly. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis aged 18-60 years, with Expanded Disability Status Scale score ≤5.5 were randomized at a ratio of 2:2:2:1 to the following groups: samPEG-IFN-ß1a 180 µg, samPEG-IFN-ß1a 240 µg, LIB, placebo. After 20 weeks, the placebo group completed the study. After week 52, the final analysis was performed, which included the primary endpoint analysis, the LIB group patients completed their participation in the study. The patients in samPEG-IFN-ß1a groups continued to receive therapy with samPEG-IFN-ß1a 240 µg until week 100 inclusive. The results of the final analysis after 52 weeks have been previously published. The current article presents a long-term efficacy and safety of samPEG-IFN-ß1a after 104 weeks of the trial. RESULTS: The annualized relapse rate over the second year was 0.16 in the samPEG-IFN-ß1a 180 µg group and 0.09 in the samPEG-IFN-ß1a 240 µg group. By week 104, the proportion of relapse-free patients was 77.0% (87/113) and 83.3% (95/114) in the samPEG-IFN-ß1a 180 µg and 240 µg groups, respectively. There were no negative dynamics of MRI markers, neurological deficit parameters and cognitive functions by scales and tests. The safety profile of samPEG-IFN-ß1a was consistent with the known safety profile of IFN-ß therapy. CONCLUSION: Treatment with samPEG-IFN-ß1a is an effective and safe first-line therapy for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients.

Pharmacodynamic biomarkers of long-term interferon beta-1a therapy in REFLEX and REFLEXION.

This post-hoc analysis evaluated candidate biomarkers of long-term efficacy of subcutaneous interferon beta-1a (sc IFN ß-1a) in REFLEX/REFLEXION studies of clinically isolated syndrome. Samples from 507 REFLEX and 287 REFLEXION study participants were analyzed. All investigated biomarkers were significantly upregulated 1.5-4-fold in response to sc IFN ß-1a treatment versus baseline (p ≤ 0.008). The validity of MX1, 2'5'OAS, and IL-1RA as biomarkers of response to sc IFN ß-1a was confirmed in this large patient cohort, with biomarkers consistently upregulated in a dose-dependent manner. Neopterin, TRAIL, and IP-10 were confirmed as biomarkers associated with long-term sc IFN ß-1a treatment efficacy over 5 years.

An investigation into the beneficial effects of high-dose interferon beta 1-a, compared to low-dose interferon beta 1-a in severe COVID-19: The COVIFERON II randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been a serious obstacle in front of public health. Interferon-beta 1a (IFN-ß 1a) has been used to treat patients with COVID-19. We aimed to compare the effectiveness of high-dose IFN-ß 1a compared to low dose IFN-ß 1a in severe COVID-19 cases. METHODS: In this randomized, controlled, and clinical trial, eligible patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections were randomly assigned to receive one of the two following therapeutic regimens: The intervention group was treated with high-dose IFN-ß 1a (Recigen) (Subcutaneous injections of 88 µg (24 million IU) on days 1, 3, 6) + lopinavir /ritonavir (Kaletra) (400 mg/100 mg twice a day for 10 days, orally) and the control group was treated with low-dose IFN-ß 1a (Recigen) (Subcutaneous injections of 44 µg (12 million IU) on days 1, 3, 6) + lopinavir /ritonavir (Kaletra) (400 mg/100 mg twice a day for 10 days, orally). RESULT: A total of 168 COVID- 19 confirmed patients underwent randomization; 83 were assigned to the intervention group and 85 were assigned to the control group. Median Time To Clinical Improvement (TTIC) for cases treated with low-dose IFN-ß1a was shorter than that for cases treated with high-dose IFN-ß1a (6 vs 10 days; P = 0.018). The mortality rates in intervention and control group were 41% and 36.5%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The use of high-dose IFN-ß 1a did not improve TTCI in hospitalized patients with moderate to severe COVID-19. Also, it did not have any significant effect on mortality reduction compared with treating with low-dose IFN-ß 1a. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial has been registered as ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04521400.

Intravenous Interferon-ß1a for the Treatment of Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Acute Myocardial Infarct in Pigs.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the potential of intravenously administered porcine recombinant interferon-ß1a (IFN-ß1a) for myocardial protection during acute ischemia-reperfusion (IR) injury in an experimental animal model. METHODS: Twenty-two piglets (mean ± standard deviation, 26.7 ± 1.65 kg) were assigned to either the IFN group (n = 12) or the control group (n = 10). IR injury was induced by occluding the distal left descending coronary artery for 30 minutes, with a reperfusion period of 6 h. In the IFN group, the animals received 12.5 µg IFN-ß1a intravenously repeatedly; the control group received saline solution. The levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6) and cardiac troponin I (TnI) were measured, and the amount of myocardial damage was quantified by analyzing myocardial apoptosis and the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of methylene blue-stained cardiac tissue. RESULTS: In the IFN group, significantly more premature deaths occurred compared with the control group (25% versus 17%, P = .013). Between the groups, the mean heart rate was higher in the IFN group (102 ± 22 versus 80 ± 20 beats per minute, P = .02). IL-6 and TnI levels were comparable between the groups, with no significant difference, and there was no difference between the study groups in myocardial apoptosis in the infarcted myocardium. The percentage of MFI differed significantly between the IFN and control groups (90.75% ± 4.90% versus 96.02% ± 2.73%, P = .01). CONCLUSION: In this acute IR injury animal model, IFN-ß1a did not protect the myocardium from IR injury, but rather increased some of the unfavorable outcomes studied.

Dynamics of pseudo-atrophy in RRMS reveals predominant gray matter compartmentalization.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the dynamics of "pseudo-atrophy," the accelerated brain volume loss observed after initiation of anti-inflammatory therapies, in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS: Monthly magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data of patients from the IMPROVE clinical study (NCT00441103) comparing relapsing-remitting MS patients treated with interferon beta-1a (IFNß-1a) for 40 weeks versus those receiving placebo (16 weeks) and then IFNß-1a (24 weeks) were used to assess percentage of gray (PGMVC) and white matter (PWMVC) volume changes. Comparisons of PGMVC and PWMVC slopes were performed with a mixed effect linear model. In the IFNß-1a-treated arm, a quadratic term was included in the model to evaluate the plateauing effect over 40 weeks. RESULTS: Up to week 16, PGMVC was -0.14% per month in the placebo and -0.27% per month in treated patients (P < 0.001). Over the same period, the decrease in PWMVC was -0.067% per month in the placebo and -0.116% per month in treated patients (P = 0.27). Similar changes were found in the group originally randomized to placebo when starting IFNß-1a treatment (week 16-40, reliability analysis). In the originally treated group, over 40 weeks, the decrease in PGMVC showed a significant (P < 0.001) quadratic component, indicating a plateauing at week 20. INTERPRETATION: Findings reported here add new insights into the complex mechanisms of pseudo-atrophy and its relation to the compartmentalized inflammation occurring in the GM of MS patients. Ongoing and forthcoming clinical trials including MRI-derived GM volume loss as an outcome measure need to account for potentially significant GM volume changes as part of the initial treatment effect.

The efficacy and safety of Ivermectin in patients with mild and moderate COVID-19: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: We will evaluate the efficacy and safety of Ivermectin in patients with mild and moderately severe COVID-19. TRIAL DESIGN: This is a phase 3, single-center, randomized, open-label, controlled trial with a 2-arm parallel-group design (1:1 ratio). PARTICIPANTS: The Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Departments of the Shahid Mohammadi Hospital, Bandar Abbas, Iran, will screen for patients age ≥ 20 years and weight ≥35 kg for the following criteria: Inclusion criteria for patients with mild COVID-19 symptoms (outpatients) 1. Diagnosed mild pneumonia using computed tomography (CT) and/or chest X-ray (CX-R) imaging, not requiring hospitalization. 2. Signing informed consent. Inclusion criteria for patients with moderate COVID-19 symptoms (inpatients) 1. Confirmed infection using PCR. 2. Diagnosed moderate pneumonia using CT and/or CXR imaging, requiring hospitalization. 3. Hospitalized ≤ 48 hours. 4. Signing informed consent. Exclusion criteria 1. Severe and critical pneumonia due to COVID-19. 2. Underlying diseases, including AIDS, asthma, loiasis, and severe liver and kidney disease. 3. Use of anticoagulants (e.g., warfarin) and ACE inhibitors (e.g., captopril). 4. History of drug allergy to Ivermectin. 5. Pregnancy or breastfeeding. INTERVENTION AND COMPARATOR: Intervention groups: Outpatient and inpatient groups will receive the standard treatment regimen for mild and moderate COVID-19, based on the Iranian Ministry of Health and Medical Education's protocol, along with oral Ivermectin (MSD Company, France) at a single dose of 0.2 mg/kg. Control groups: The outpatient group will receive hydroxychloroquine sulfate (Amin Pharmaceutical Company, Iran) at a dose of 400 mg twice a day for the first day and 200 mg twice a day for seven subsequent days. The inpatient group will receive 200/50 mg Lopinavir/Ritonavir (Heterd Company, India) twice a day for the seven days, plus five doses of 44 mcg Interferon beta-1a (CinnaGen, Iran) every other day. Other supportive and routine care will be the same in both outpatient and inpatient groups. MAIN OUTCOME: The primary outcomes are composite and include the improvement of clinical symptoms and need for hospitalization for outpatient groups, and the length of hospital stay until discharge, the need for ICU admission until discharge, and the need for mechanical ventilation for inpatient groups within seven days of randomization. The secondary outcome is the incidence of serious adverse drug reactions within seven days of randomization. RANDOMIZATION: Patients in both outpatient (mild) and inpatient (moderate) groups will be randomized into the treatment and control groups based on the following method. A simple randomization method and table of random numbers will be used. If the selected number is even, the patient is allocated to the treatment group, and if it is odd, the patient is allocated to the control group in a 1:1 ratio. BLINDING (MASKING): This is an open-label study, and there is not blinding. Numbers to be randomized (sample size) A total number of 120 patients (60 outpatients and 60 patients) will be randomized into two groups (30 patients in each of the intervention groups and 30 patients in each of the control groups). TRIAL STATUS: The protocol is Version 1.0, November 17, 2020. Recruitment began November 25, 2020, and is anticipated to be completed by February 25, 2021. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This clinical trial has been registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT). The registration number is " IRCT20200506047323N6 ". The registration date is November 17, 2020. FULL PROTOCOL: The full protocol is attached as an additional file, accessible from the Trials website (Additional file 1). In the interest in expediting the dissemination of this material, the familiar formatting has been eliminated; this letter serves as a summary of the key elements of the full protocol.

Safety and efficacy of inhaled nebulised interferon beta-1a (SNG001) for treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection carries a substantial risk of severe and prolonged illness; treatment options are currently limited. We assessed the efficacy and safety of inhaled nebulised interferon beta-1a (SNG001) for the treatment of patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19. METHODS: We did a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 pilot trial at nine UK sites. Adults aged 18 years or older and admitted to hospital with COVID-19 symptoms, with a positive RT-PCR or point-of-care test, or both, were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive SNG001 (6 MIU) or placebo by inhalation via a mouthpiece daily for 14 days. The primary outcome was the change in clinical condition on the WHO Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement (OSCI) during the dosing period in the intention-to-treat population (all randomised patients who received at least one dose of the study drug). The OSCI is a 9-point scale, where 0 corresponds to no infection and 8 corresponds to death. Multiple analyses were done to identify the most suitable statistical method for future clinical trials. Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events for 28 days. This trial is registered with Clinicaltrialsregister.eu (2020-001023-14) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04385095); the pilot trial of inpatients with COVID-19 is now completed. FINDINGS: Between March 30 and May 30, 2020, 101 patients were randomly assigned to SNG001 (n=50) or placebo (n=51). 48 received SNG001 and 50 received placebo and were included in the intention-to-treat population. 66 (67%) patients required oxygen supplementation at baseline: 29 in the placebo group and 37 in the SNG001 group. Patients receiving SNG001 had greater odds of improvement on the OSCI scale (odds ratio 2·32 [95% CI 1·07-5·04]; p=0·033) on day 15 or 16 and were more likely than those receiving placebo to recover to an OSCI score of 1 (no limitation of activities) during treatment (hazard ratio 2·19 [95% CI 1·03-4·69]; p=0·043). SNG001 was well tolerated. The most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse event was headache (seven [15%] patients in the SNG001 group and five [10%] in the placebo group). There were three deaths in the placebo group and none in the SNG001 group. INTERPRETATION: Patients who received SNG001 had greater odds of improvement and recovered more rapidly from SARS-CoV-2 infection than patients who received placebo, providing a strong rationale for further trials. FUNDING: Synairgen Research.

Treatment Response Score to Glatiramer Acetate or Interferon Beta-1a.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of glatiramer acetate (GA) vs intramuscular interferon beta-1a (IFN-ß-1a), we applied a previously published statistical method aimed at identifying patients' profiles associated with efficacy of treatments. METHODS: Data from 2 independent multiple sclerosis datasets, a randomized study (the Combination Therapy in Patients With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis [CombiRx] trial, evaluating GA vs IFN-ß-1a) and an observational cohort extracted from MSBase, were used to build and validate a treatment response score, regressing annualized relapse rates (ARRs) on a set of baseline predictors. RESULTS: The overall ARR ratio of GA to IFN-ß-1a in the CombiRx trial was 0.72. The response score (made up of a linear combination of age, sex, relapses in the previous year, disease duration, and Expanded Disability Status Scale score) detected differential response of GA vs IFN-ß-1a: in the trial, patients with the largest benefit from GA vs IFN-ß-1a (lower score quartile) had an ARR ratio of 0.40 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.25-0.63), those in the 2 middle quartiles of 0.90 (95% CI 0.61-1.34), and those in the upper quartile of 1.14 (95% CI 0.59-2.18) (heterogeneity p = 0.012); this result was validated on MSBase, with the corresponding ARR ratios of 0.58 (95% CI 0.46-0.72), 0.92 (95% CI 0.77-1.09,) and 1.29 (95% CI 0.97-1.71); heterogeneity p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate the possibility of a criterion, based on patients' characteristics, to choose whether to treat with GA or IFN-ß-1a. This result, replicated on an independent real-life cohort, may have implications for clinical decisions in everyday clinical practice.

Interferon ß-1a (IFNß-1a) in COVID-19 patients (INTERCOP): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacological therapies of proven efficacy in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are still lacking. We have identified IFNß-1a as the most promising drug to be repurposed for COVID-19. The rationale relies on the evidence of IFNß anti-viral activity in vitro against SARS-CoV-2 and animal models resembling SARS-CoV-2 infection and on a recent clinical trial where IFNß was indicated as the key component of a successful therapeutic combination. METHODS: This is a randomized, controlled, open-label, monocentric, phase II trial (INTERCOP trial). One hundred twenty-six patients with positive swab detection of SARS-CoV-2, radiological signs of pneumonia, and mild-to-moderate disease will be randomized 2:1 to IFNß-1a in addition to standard of care vs standard of care alone. No other anti-viral drugs will be used as part of the regimens, both in the control and the intervention arms. IFNß-1a will be administered subcutaneously at the dose of 44 mcg (equivalent to 12 million international units) three times per week, at least 48 h apart, for a total of 2 weeks. The primary outcome is the time to negative conversion of SARS-CoV-2 nasopharyngeal swabs. Secondary outcomes include improvement or worsening in a clinical severity score measured on a 7-point ordinal scale (including transfer to intensive care unit and death), oxygen- and ventilator-free days, mortality, changes in pulmonary computed tomography severity score, hospital stay duration, reduction of viral load measured on nasopharyngeal swabs, number of serious adverse events, and changes in biochemical markers of organ dysfunction. Exploratory outcomes include blood cell counts, cytokine and inflammatory profile, peripheral mRNA expression profiles of interferon-stimulated genes, and antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 and to IFNß-1a. INTERCOP is the first study to specifically investigate the clinical benefits of IFNß-1a in COVID-19 patients. DISCUSSION: Potential implications of this trial are multifaceted: should the primary outcome be fulfilled and the treatment be safe, one may envisage that IFNß-1a be used to reduce the infectivity of patients with mild-to moderate disease. In case IFNß-1a reduced the duration of hospital stay and/or ameliorated the clinical status, it may become a cornerstone of COVID-19 treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT 2020-002458-25. Registered on May 11, 2020 ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04449380.

An investigation into the beneficial effects of high-dose interferon beta 1-a, compared to low-dose interferon beta 1-a (the base therapeutic regimen) in moderate to severe COVID-19: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled l trial.

OBJECTIVES: We will investigate the effectiveness of high dose Interferon Beta 1a, compared to low dose Interferon Beta 1a (the base therapeutic regimen) in COVID-19 Confirmed Cases (Either RT-PCR or CT Scan Confirmed) with moderate to severe disease TRIAL DESIGN: This is a single center, open label, randomized, controlled, 2-arm parallel group (1:1 ratio), clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: The eligibility criteria in this study is: age ≥ 18 years, oxygen saturation (SPO2) ≤ 93% or respiratory rate ≥ 24, at least one of the following manifestation: radiation contactless body temperature ≥37.8, Cough, shortness of breath, nasal congestion/ discharge, myalgia/arthralgia, diarrhea/vomiting, headache or fatigue on admission. The onset of the symptoms should be acute (≤ 14 days). The exclusion criteria include refusal to participate, using drugs with potential interaction with lopinavir/ritonavir or interferon-ß 1a, blood ALT/AST levels > 5 times the upper limit of normal on laboratory results, pregnant or lactating women, history of alcohol or drug addiction in the past 5 years, the patients who be intubated less than one hours after admission to hospital. This study will be undertaken at the Loghman Hakim Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences. INTERVENTION AND COMPARATOR: COVID- 19 confirmed patients (using the RT-PCR test or CT scan) will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. The intervention group (Arms1) will be treated with lopinavir / ritonavir (Kaletra) + high dose Interferon-ß 1a (Recigen) and the control group will be treated with lopinavir / ritonavir (Kaletra) + low dose Interferon-ß 1a (Recigen) (the base therapeutic regimen). Both groups will receive standard care consisting of the necessary oxygen support, non-invasive, or invasive mechanical ventilation. MAIN OUTCOMES: Primary outcome: Time to clinical improvement is our primary outcome measure. This is an improvement of two points on a seven-category ordinal scale (recommended by the World Health Organization: Coronavirus disease (COVID-2019) R&D. Geneva: World Health Organization) or discharge from the hospital, whichever comes first. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: mortality from the date of randomization until the last day of the study which will be the day all of the patients have had at least one of the following outcomes: 1) Improvement of two points on a seven-category ordinal scale. 2) Discharge from the hospital 3) Death. Improvement of SPO2 during the hospitalization, duration of hospitalization from date of randomization until the date of hospital discharge or death, whichever comes first. The incidence of new mechanical ventilation uses from the date of randomization until the last day of the study and the duration of it will be extracted. Please note that we are trying to add further secondary outcomes and this section of the protocol is still evolving. RANDOMIZATION: Eligible patients with confirmed SARS-Cov-2 infections will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to two therapeutic arms using permuted, block-randomization to balance the number of patients allocated to each group. The permuted block (three or six patients per block) randomization sequence will be generated, using Package 'randomizeR' in R software version 3.6.1. and placed in individual sealed and opaque envelopes by the statistician. The investigator will enroll the patients and only then open envelopes to assign patients to the different treatment groups. This method of allocation concealment will result in minimum selection and confounding biases. BLINDING (MASKING): The present research is open-label (no masking) of patients and health care professionals who are undertaking outcome assessment of the primary outcome - time to clinical improvement. NUMBERS TO BE RANDOMISED (SAMPLE SIZE): Of the 100 patients randomised, 50 patients will be assigned to receive high dose Interferon beta-1a plus lopinavir/ritonavir (Kaletra), 50 patients will be assigned to receive low dose Interferon beta 1a plus lopinavir/ritonavir (Kaletra). TRIAL STATUS: Protocol version 1.2.1. Recruitment is finished, the start date of recruitment was on August 20th 2020, and the end date was on September 4th 2020. Last point of data collection will be the last day on which all of the 100 participants have had an outcome of clinical improvement or death, up to 14th days after hospitalization. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered with National Institutes of Health Clinical trials ( www.clinicaltrials.gov ; identification number NCT04521400, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04521400 , registered August 18, 2020 and first available online August 20, 2020). FULL PROTOCOL: The full protocol is attached as an additional file, accessible from the Trials website (Additional file 1). In the interest in expediting dissemination of this material, the familiar formatting has been eliminated; this Letter serves as a summary of the key elements of the full protocol.

Efficacy and Safety of Alemtuzumab Through 9 Years of Follow-up in Patients with Highly Active Disease: Post Hoc Analysis of CARE-MS I and II Patients in the TOPAZ Extension Study.

BACKGROUND: Alemtuzumab efficacy versus subcutaneous interferon-ß-1a (SC IFNB-1a) was demonstrated over 2 years in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, with continued efficacy over 7 additional years. Alemtuzumab is included as a recommended treatment for patients with highly active disease (HAD) by the American Academy of Neurology Practice Guidelines, and the label indication in Europe was recently restricted to the treatment of HAD patients. There is currently no consensus definition for HAD, and alemtuzumab efficacy across various HAD definitions has not been explored previously. OBJECTIVES: In this post hoc analysis, we assess the efficacy and safety of alemtuzumab in Comparison of Alemtuzumab and Rebif® Efficacy in Multiple Sclerosis (CARE-MS) trial patients who met criteria for at least one of four separate definitions of HAD (one primary and three alternatives). Over 2 years, alemtuzumab-treated HAD patients were compared with SC IFNB-1a-treated HAD patients, with additional 7-year follow-up in patients from the alemtuzumab arm. METHODS: Patients in the CARE-MS studies received either alemtuzumab (baseline: 5 days; 12 months later: 3 days) or SC IFNB-1a (3 times weekly). Alemtuzumab-treated patients who enrolled in the extensions could receive additional courses ≥ 12 months apart. Four definitions of HAD were applied to assess alemtuzumab efficacy: the pre-specified primary definition (two or more relapses in the year prior to baseline and at least one gadolinium [Gd]-enhancing lesion at baseline) and three alternative definitions that focused on relapse, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or prior treatment response criteria. Efficacy outcomes were annualized relapse rate, change in Expanded Disability Status Scale score, 6-month confirmed disability worsening, 6-month confirmed disability improvement, MRI disease activity, and brain volume change. Adverse events were summarized for HAD patients meeting the primary definition. RESULTS: In the pooled CARE-MS population, 208 alemtuzumab-treated patients met the primary HAD definition. Annualized relapse rate was 0.27 in years 0-2 and 0.16 in years 3-9. Over 9 years, 62% of patients were free of 6-month confirmed disability worsening, 50% had 6-month confirmed disability improvement, and median cumulative change in brain volume was - 2.15%. During year 9, 62% had no evidence of disease activity, and 69% were free of MRI disease activity. Similar efficacy outcomes were observed using an alternative relapse-driven HAD definition. For patients meeting alternative HAD definitions focused on either higher MRI lesion counts or disease activity while on prior therapy, reduced efficacy for some endpoints was seen. Safety was consistent with the overall CARE-MS population through year 9. CONCLUSIONS: Over 9 years, alemtuzumab efficacy was maintained in CARE-MS HAD patients based on four HAD definitions. These results support intervention with alemtuzumab in patients with early indicators of HAD, including frequent relapse without high MRI activity. No safety signals were observed over 9 years that were unique to the HAD populations. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIERS: NCT00530348; NCT00548405; NCT00930553; NCT02255656.

Subcutaneous administration of interferon beta-1a for COVID-19: A non-controlled prospective trial.

BACKGROUND: Recently, a new coronavirus spreads rapidly throughout the countries and resulted in a worldwide epidemic. Interferons have direct antiviral and immunomodulatory effects. Antiviral effects may include inhibition of viral replication, protein synthesis, virus maturation, or virus release from infected cells. Previous studies have shown that some coronaviruses are susceptible to interferons. The aim of this study was to evaluate the therapeutic effects of IFN-ß-1a administration in COVID-19. METHODS: In this prospective non-controlled trial, 20 patients included. They received IFN-ß-1a at a dose of 44 µg subcutaneously every other day up to 10 days. All patients received conventional therapy including Hydroxychloroquine, and lopinavir/ritonavir. Demographic data, clinical symptoms, virological clearance, and imaging findings recorded during the study. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 58.55 ± 13.43 years. Fever resolved in all patients during first seven days. Although other symptoms decreased gradually. Virological clearance results showed a significant decrease within 10 days. Imaging studies showed significant recovery after 14-day period in all patients. The mean time of hospitalization was 16.8 ± 3.4 days. There were no deaths or significant adverse drug reactions in the 14-day period. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the use of IFN-ß-1a in combination with hydroxychloroquine and lopinavir/ritonavir in the management of COVID-19. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: IRCT20151227025726N12.

Interferons in the Therapy of Severe Coronavirus Infections: A Critical Analysis and Recollection of a Forgotten Therapeutic Regimen with Interferon Beta.

The pharmacological and immunological properties of interferons, especially those of interferon beta, and the corresponding treatment strategies are described, and the results of studies with different interferons in coronavirus infections are analysed. Furthermore, the data obtained with high-dosed native interferon beta in life-threatening acute viral diseases as well as the results of clinical pilot studies with high-dosed recombinant interferon beta-1a are provided because they serve as the rationale for the proposed therapeutic regimen to be applied in acute viral infections. This regimen differs from those approved for treatment of multiple sclerosis and consists of interferon beta-1a administered as a 24 hour intravenous infusion at a daily dose of up to 90 µg for 3-5 consecutive days. Since under this regimen transient severe side effects can occur, it is analysed which patients are suitable for this kind of treatment in general and if patients with severe coronavirus infections could also be treated accordingly.

An observational study demonstrating the adherence and ease of use of the injector device, RebiSmart®.

Background: Adherence to Multiple Sclerosis (MS) treatment is considered one of the crucial factors for ensuring optimal clinical outcomes. Research has shown that the use of self-injector devices improves patient compliance with treatment. Therefore, the main purpose of this study is to evaluate the ease of use of RebiSmart® 2.0 in clinically isolated syndrome/relapsing-remitting MS patients during 12 months treatment period.Methods: A total number of 290 subjects entered into data collection; 249 (86%) of them completed the whole 12 months study period. The primary endpoints and the secondary endpoints were assessed by the User Study Questionnaire. Adherence data were retrieved from RebiSmart® 2.0 (Menu - Dose History) on the respective patient's visit. Outcome measures also included Expanded Disability Status Score, Kurtzke Functional Systems, and Modified Social Support Survey, Modified Social Support Survey-5.Results: This study demonstrated a very high proportion (>95%) of patients with a positive rating of the overall ease of use and the overall convenience of RebiSmart®. The proportion of patients with a positive rating of the ease of use by individual domains and the functions of RebiSmart® were also high (>80%).Conclusion: The findings demonstrate a very good perception of the usability of the device by patients overall and in its individual functions.

Adherence to self-administering interferon-ß1a using RebiSmart® device in Mexican patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Adherence to disease-modifying therapies is determinant to attain maximal clinical benefit in multiple sclerosis (MS). RebiSmart® is an electronic auto-injector for subcutaneous delivery of interferon ß-1a (INF-ß1a) that monitors adherence by featuring a log of each drug administration for objective evaluation. The aim of this study was to assess long-term adherence to INF-ß1a by using the RebiSmart® device in Mexican patients with relapsing MS. METHODS: This is an observational multicenter study on patients with relapsing MS treated with INF-ß1a subcutaneously delivered by the RebiSmart® device. Adherence was computed as the number of injections received during the study period divided by the number of injections scheduled and expressed as percent. RESULTS: A total of 66 patients from 6 specialized MS centers were evaluated (45 females and 21 males, mean age 43.91±13.32 years). Mean adherence was 79.51±18% (median: 85.54%, range: 34.4-100%). During a median follow-up of 27.5 months (mean 33.36±29.39 months) the annualized relapse rate had a mean of 0.50±1.63. Mean initial EDSS was 1.90±1.52, and mean EDSS at the end of follow-up was 1.80±1.74. Compared with their counterparts, the mean number of relapses was significantly lower among patients with high (>80%) adherence (0.25±0.44 vs 0.67±92 relapses, respectively; P = 0.03). The proportion of relapse-free patients was 75.0% among patients with high adherence and 53.3% in low-compliant patients (P = 0.06). High adherence patients presented lower rates of EDSS worsening ≥1.0 at the end of treatment, as compared with low-compliant patients (11.1% vs 43.3%, respectively; P = 0.003). High schooling (>12 years) was the only predictor of a high adherence (OR: 2.97, 05% CI: 1.08-1.18; P = 0.03) and of being relapse-free during follow-up (OR: 3.22, 05% CI: 1.12-9.23; P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Adherence to INF-ß1a using RebiSmart® in this Mexican cohort with MS was moderate, but associated with low relapse rate and influenced by high schooling.

Necrotizing Fasciitis in a Patient on Long-Term Intramuscular Interferon-Beta for Multiple Sclerosis: A Case Report.

CASE: Immunomodulatory injections are becoming common long-term treatments for neuromuscular diseases such as multiple sclerosis (MS), although they carry a risk of local site infection. We describe a case of a 57-year-old man who developed necrotizing fasciitis of the anterior thigh secondary to intramuscular (IM) injections of interferon-beta-1A for MS, ultimately developing septic shock and requiring serial debridements for source control. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first reported case of necrotizing fasciitis from chronic IM injections for MS and deserves particular attention because of the immunosuppressive nature of the injections. In patients with underlying predisposing factors for infection, such as decubitus ulcers, it may be prudent to reconsider the administration route. Patients in hypermetabolic states should be closely monitored for impaired response to infections.

Administration of subcutaneous interferon beta 1a in the evening: data from RELIEF study.

BACKGROUND: Subcutaneous recombinant interferon-beta 1a (IFN-ß1a SC) is indicated for treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS); however, it is associated with development of flu-like syndrome (FLS) in 75% of patients. No recommendations are available on whether evening or morning administration could induce better or worse FLS. OBJECTIVE: Primary objective was to investigate whether morning administration of IFN-ß1a 44 µg (Rebif) would affect the severity of FLS versus evening administration, in patients with RMS. Secondary objectives were to investigate whether timing of administration could lead to a better quality of life. METHODS: Multicenter, open-label, 12-week, randomized, controlled, parallel-group, phase 4 study. RESULTS: Of 217 patients screened at 29 Italian sites, 200 were included in the study. Among these, 104 patients were randomized to IFN-ß1a SC administration in the morning and 96 in the evening. Morning administration resulted in higher FLS scores, as measured by the Multiple Sclerosis Treatment Concern Questionnaire, at week 4 (p = 0.0083) and week 8 (p = 0.0079); however, the difference was no longer significant at the end of 12 weeks. CONCLUSION: IFN-ß1a evening injections in the first 8 weeks of treatment led to an improvement in FLS; when continuing therapy, time of administration could be decided according to patient's lifestyle and preference.

Effect of Intravenous Interferon ß-1a on Death and Days Free From Mechanical Ventilation Among Patients With Moderate to Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is associated with high mortality. Interferon (IFN) ß-1a may prevent the underlying event of vascular leakage. Objective: To determine the efficacy and adverse events of IFN-ß-1a in patients with moderate to severe ARDS. Design, Setting, and Participants: Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial conducted at 74 intensive care units in 8 European countries (December 2015-December 2017) that included 301 adults with moderate to severe ARDS according to the Berlin definition. The radiological and partial pressure of oxygen, arterial (Pao2)/fraction of inspired oxygen (Fio2) criteria for ARDS had to be met within a 24-hour period, and the administration of the first dose of the study drug had to occur within 48 hours of the diagnosis of ARDS. The last patient visit was on March 6, 2018. Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive an intravenous injection of 10 µg of IFN-ß-1a (144 patients) or placebo (152 patients) once daily for 6 days. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was a score combining death and number of ventilator-free days at day 28 (score ranged from -1 for death to 27 if the patient was off ventilator on the first day). There were 16 secondary outcomes, including 28-day mortality, which were tested hierarchically to control type I error. Results: Among 301 patients who were randomized (mean age, 58 years; 103 women [34.2%]), 296 (98.3%) completed the trial and were included in the primary analysis. At 28 days, the median composite score of death and number of ventilator-free days at day 28 was 10 days (interquartile range, -1 to 20) in the IFN-ß-1a group and 8.5 days (interquartile range, 0 to 20) in the placebo group (P = .82). There was no significant difference in 28-day mortality between the IFN-ß-1a vs placebo groups (26.4% vs 23.0%; difference, 3.4% [95% CI, -8.1% to 14.8%]; P = .53). Seventy-four patients (25.0%) experienced adverse events considered to be related to treatment during the study (41 patients [28.5%] in the IFN-ß-1a group and 33 [21.7%] in the placebo group). Conclusions and Relevance: Among adults with moderate or severe ARDS, intravenous IFN-ß-1a administered for 6 days, compared with placebo, resulted in no significant difference in a composite score that included death and number of ventilator-free days over 28 days. These results do not support the use of IFN-ß-1a in the management of ARDS. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02622724.

A method to compare prospective and historical cohorts to evaluate drug effects. Application to the analysis of early treatment effectiveness of intramuscular interferon-ß1a in multiple sclerosis patients.

BACKGROUND: Disease modifying therapy have changed the natural evolution of multiple sclerosis (MS), with efficacy demonstrated in randomized clinical trials. Standard-of-care effectiveness is needed to complement clinical trial data and highlight outcomes in real-world practice, but comparing prospective patients with historical cohorts likely introduces biases. To address these potential biases, assigning a patient with a score that expresses his/her disease prognosis before starting a therapy may make it possible to evaluate the unbiased ability of the therapy to modify disease natural history. Thus, we aimed at analyzing the effectiveness of intramuscular interferon-ß1a (im IFN-ß1a) matching by BREMSO score (Bayesian Risk Estimate for Multiple Sclerosis at Onset) a prospective real-world cohort of treated patients with a historical cohort of untreated patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We observed 108 newly diagnosed, treatment naïve MS patients over 12 months of treatment with im IFN-ß1a. BREMSO score was used to assign a value to each patient, giving the real-world treated patients comparable with the Historical untreated patients, on the basis of the same risk to have unfavorable evolution. RESULTS: A significantly higher percentage of relapse-free patients is observed in IFN-ß1a treated cohort vs. Historical untreated cohort (79.6% vs. 59.3%, p < 0.01). Clinical relapses risk is reduced by 2.2 times in treated patients (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: We propose a promising method to manage observational data in a relatively unbiased way, in order to analyze real-world treatment effectiveness.