RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Crisis pregnancy centers (CPCs) are nonprofit antiabortion organizations that claim provision of pregnancy resources. With the Reproduction Freedom, Accountability, Comprehensive Care, and Transparency Act repealed, CPCs are no longer mandated to share information on state-funded family planning and abortion services. As patients increasingly seek healthcare guidance online, we evaluated crowd-sourced reviews of CPCs using the social networking site Yelp. METHODS: CPCs were identified with the CPC Map, a geo-based location resource. Of California's 145 CPCs, 84% had Yelp pages, and 619 reviews (2010-2019) were extracted. Thematic codes were individually applied to 220 excerpts and then analyzed in detail using thematic analysis to capture emergent themes related to motivations for and experiences of CPCs. To ensure thematic saturation, we applied a natural language-processing technique called the meaning extraction method to computationally derive themes of discussion from all of the extracted posts. RESULTS: Motivations to seek care from CPCs included pregnancy confirmation, gaps in healthcare coverage, parenting and emotional support, and abortion care. A review of experiences reveal that CPC faith-based practice garnered both positive- and negative-based experiences. Reviewers also articulated inaccurate medical information, lack of transparency, and reduced options at CPCs. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to analyze California CPCs using a social media platform. Pregnant patients turn to social media to share experiences about pregnancy resources, to find healthcare providers, and to increase transparency of services. This content provides valuable insight into the concerns of pregnant patients and offers an intimate view of California CPCs at a time when no federal regulations are in place.
Asunto(s)
Aborto Inducido/psicología , Intervención en la Crisis (Psiquiatría)/normas , Acontecimientos que Cambian la Vida , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Aborto Inducido/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , California , Intervención en la Crisis (Psiquiatría)/métodos , Intervención en la Crisis (Psiquiatría)/estadística & datos numéricos , Colaboración de las Masas/métodos , Colaboración de las Masas/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Internet , Motivación , EmbarazoRESUMEN
Police calls for service are an important conduit by which officers and researchers can obtain insight into public requests for police service. Questions remain, however, about the quality of these data, and, particularly, the prevalence of measurement error in the classifications of events. As part of the present research, we assess the accuracy of call-types used by police dispatchers to describe events that are responded to by police officers. Drawing upon a sample of 515,155 calls for police service, we explore the differences among initial call-types, cleared call-types, and crime-types as documented in crime reports. Our analyses reveal that although the majority of calls for service exhibit overlap in their classifications, many still exhibit evidence of misclassification. Our analyses also reveal that such patterns vary as a function of call- and crime-type categories. We discuss our findings in light of the challenges of the classification process and the associated implications.
Asunto(s)
Intervención en la Crisis (Psiquiatría)/métodos , Asesoramiento de Urgencias Médicas/normas , Aplicación de la Ley/clasificación , Intervención en la Crisis (Psiquiatría)/normas , Bases de Datos Factuales , Asesoramiento de Urgencias Médicas/clasificación , Humanos , PoliciaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has overwhelmed healthcare resources even in wealthy nations, necessitating rationing of limited resources without previously established crisis standards of care protocols. In Massachusetts, triage guidelines were designed based on acute illness and chronic life-limiting conditions. In this study, we sought to retrospectively validate this protocol to cohorts of critically ill patients from our hospital. DESIGN: We applied our hospital-adopted guidelines, which defined severe and major chronic conditions as those associated with a greater than 50% likelihood of 1- and 5-year mortality, respectively, to a critically ill patient population. We investigated mortality for the same intervals. SETTING: An urban safety-net hospital ICU. PATIENTS: All adults hospitalized during April of 2015 and April 2019 identified through a clinical database search. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of 365 admitted patients, 15.89% had one or more defined chronic life-limiting conditions. These patients had higher 1-year (46.55% vs 13.68%; p < 0.01) and 5-year (50.00% vs 17.22%; p < 0.01) mortality rates than those without underlying conditions. Irrespective of classification of disease severity, patients with metastatic cancer, congestive heart failure, end-stage renal disease, and neurodegenerative disease had greater than 50% 1-year mortality, whereas patients with chronic lung disease and cirrhosis had less than 50% 1-year mortality. Observed 1- and 5-year mortality for cirrhosis, heart failure, and metastatic cancer were more variable when subdivided into severe and major categories. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with major and severe chronic medical conditions overall had 46.55% and 50.00% mortality at 1 and 5 years, respectively. However, mortality varied between conditions. Our findings appear to support a crisis standards protocol which focuses on acute illness severity and only considers underlying conditions carrying a greater than 50% predicted likelihood of 1-year mortality. Modifications to the chronic lung disease, congestive heart failure, and cirrhosis criteria should be refined if they are to be included in future models.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/terapia , Intervención en la Crisis (Psiquiatría)/normas , Asignación de Recursos/métodos , Centros Médicos Académicos/organización & administración , Centros Médicos Académicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , COVID-19/epidemiología , Intervención en la Crisis (Psiquiatría)/métodos , Intervención en la Crisis (Psiquiatría)/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Massachusetts , Persona de Mediana Edad , Asignación de Recursos/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Proveedores de Redes de Seguridad/organización & administración , Proveedores de Redes de Seguridad/estadística & datos numéricos , Nivel de Atención/normas , Nivel de Atención/estadística & datos numéricos , Población Urbana/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
Crisis intervention psychotherapy (CIP) is an underutilized form of therapy that can be offered as a treatment during psychiatric disasters and emergencies, and it may be especially useful during the age of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). CIP is a problem-solving, solution-focused, trauma-informed treatment, utilizing an individual or systemic/family-centered approach. CIP is a brief form of psychotherapy delivered as a companion or follow-up to psychological first aid. Crisis psychotherapy is designed to resolve a crisis and restore daily functioning. CIP can be adapted as a single session for a COVID-19 mental health emergency or for a hotline or as 2 to 20 sessions of treatment with COVID-19 patients and families offered virtually on a psychiatric inpatient unit, through a consultation-liaison service, or in outpatient settings. This article reviews the history of critical incident stress management and the use of its replacement, psychological first aid. The history and core principles of crisis psychotherapy and 8 core elements of treatment are described. The use of digital and virtual technology has enabled the delivery of crisis psychotherapy during the COVID-19 pandemic. A case study of a family impacted by COVID-19 is reported as an illustration. The use of a 6-week timeline, an ecological map, and a problem-solving wheel-and-spoke treatment plan are demonstrated.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/psicología , Intervención en la Crisis (Psiquiatría) , Terapia Familiar , Psicoterapia Breve , Telemedicina , Intervención en la Crisis (Psiquiatría)/métodos , Intervención en la Crisis (Psiquiatría)/normas , Terapia Familiar/métodos , Terapia Familiar/normas , Humanos , Psicoterapia Breve/métodos , Psicoterapia Breve/normas , Telemedicina/métodos , Telemedicina/normasAsunto(s)
Personal de Salud/psicología , Errores Médicos/psicología , Enfermedades Profesionales/psicología , Sistemas de Apoyo Psicosocial , Lista de Verificación , Intervención en la Crisis (Psiquiatría)/normas , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Enfermedades Profesionales/terapia , Seguridad del Paciente , Distrés Psicológico , Resiliencia Psicológica , España , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The most common crisis intervention used with German rescue workers is Critical Incident Stress Management (CISM). Results regarding its effectiveness are inconsistent. A negative reinforcement of avoidance, due to premature termination of strong emotions during the Critical Incident Stress Debriefing (CISD), may explain this. The effectiveness of the CISD after terror attacks in Germany has not yet been investigated. METHODS: All emergency responders deployed at the terror attack on Breitscheidplatz in Berlin were invited to take part in the study; 37 of the N = 55 participants had voluntarily participated in CISD; 18 had not. RESULTS: Participants with CISD showed lower quality of life in psychological health and higher depressive symptomatology. Of these, females had lower quality of life in social relationships, whereas males showed more posttraumatic stress symptoms. Emergency responders from non-governmental organizations had higher phobic anxiety. Emergency medical technicians showed more somatic and depressive symptoms. CONCLUSION: There is no conclusive explanation for why rescue workers with CISD score worse on certain measures. It is possible that CISD has a harmful influence due to negative reinforcement, or that there was a selection effect. Further research differentiating occupational group, sex, and type of event is necessary.
Asunto(s)
Intervención en la Crisis (Psiquiatría)/normas , Socorristas/psicología , Terrorismo/psicología , Adulto , Berlin , Intervención en la Crisis (Psiquiatría)/métodos , Intervención en la Crisis (Psiquiatría)/estadística & datos numéricos , Socorristas/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Servicios de Salud Mental/normas , Servicios de Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Psicometría/instrumentación , Psicometría/métodos , Trabajo de Rescate/métodos , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
Hospital emergency departments (EDs) are important settings for the implementation of effective suicide-specific care. Usual care for suicidal patients who present to EDs remains understudied. This study surveyed EDs in Washington State to assess the adoption of written procedures for recommended standards of care for treating suicidality. Most (N = 79, 84.9%) of the 93 EDs in Washington State participated. Most (n = 58, 73.4%) hospitals had a written protocol for suicide risk assessment, but half (n = 42, 53.2%) did not include documentation of access to lethal means. There was evidence of an association between patient volume and the adoption of suicide-specific protocols and procedures. Our findings suggest the need to enhance the adoption and implementation of recommended standard care in this setting.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos Clínicos/normas , Intervención en la Crisis (Psiquiatría) , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Adhesión a Directriz/normas , Nivel de Atención/organización & administración , Prevención del Suicidio , Suicidio , Adulto , Intervención en la Crisis (Psiquiatría)/métodos , Intervención en la Crisis (Psiquiatría)/normas , Socorristas/clasificación , Socorristas/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/normas , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Servicios Preventivos de Salud/métodos , Servicios Preventivos de Salud/normas , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Suicidio/psicología , Suicidio/estadística & datos numéricos , Washingtón/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Dating abuse (DA) is prevalent and consequential, yet there are no evidence-based interventions for the health care setting that prevent perpetration. The current study's purpose was to test a one-session brief motivational interview-style intervention to decrease DA perpetration. We conducted a two-arm RCT of the Real Talk intervention with follow-up at 3 and 6 months. Participants were 172 youth ages 15-19 years old, recruited from the pediatric emergency department or outpatient care services of an urban hospital in the USA in 2014-2017. The primary outcome was change in self-reported DA perpetration, including subtypes of DA such as physical, sexual, psychological, and cyber DA. Youth in both intervention and control arms reduced DA perpetration over time. GEE models indicated no overall intervention effects for any, physical, sexual, or psychological DA. There were overall effects for cyber DA (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.27, 0.87). There were also effects at 3 months for psychological DA (RR 0.24, 95% CI 0.06, 0.93) and cyber DA (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.19, 0.79). Analyses stratified by gender also found overall effects for males for any DA (RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.07, 0.55), physical DA (RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.10, 0.89), and cyber DA (RR 0.04, 95% CI 0.01, 0.27). For males, intervention effects on any DA persisted to 6 months (RR 0.13, 95% CI 0.02, 1.01). This health care-based one-session DA intervention is a potentially promising approach to reduce DA perpetration among adolescents.Clinical trial registration: This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT02080923.
Asunto(s)
Intervención en la Crisis (Psiquiatría)/normas , Violencia de Pareja/prevención & control , Adolescente , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Entrevista Motivacional , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Delitos Sexuales , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Crisis pregnancy centers (CPCs) attempt to dissuade pregnant people from considering abortion, often using misinformation and unethical practices. While mimicking health care clinics, CPCs provide biased, limited, and inaccurate health information, including incomplete pregnancy options counseling and unscientific sexual and reproductive health information. The centers do not provide or refer for abortion or contraception but often advertise in ways that give the appearance that they do provide these services without disclosing the biased nature and marked limitations of their services. Although individuals working in CPCs in the U.S. have First Amendment rights to free speech, their provision of misinformation may be harmful to young people and adults. The Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine and North American Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology support the following positions: (1) CPCs pose risk by failing to adhere to medical and ethical practice standards, (2) governments should only support health programs that provide accurate, comprehensive information, (3) CPCs and individuals who provide CPC services should be held to established standards of ethics and medical care, (4) schools should not outsource sexual education to CPCs or other entities that do not provide accurate and complete health information, (5) search engines and digital platforms should enforce policies against misleading advertising by CPCs, and (6) health professionals should educate themselves, and young people about CPCs and help young people identify safe, quality sources of sexual and reproductive health information and care.
Asunto(s)
Aborto Inducido , Salud del Adolescente , Consejo , Intervención en la Crisis (Psiquiatría) , Salud Reproductiva , Sociedades Médicas , Aborto Inducido/educación , Aborto Inducido/ética , Adolescente , Consejo/ética , Consejo/normas , Intervención en la Crisis (Psiquiatría)/ética , Intervención en la Crisis (Psiquiatría)/normas , Femenino , Ginecología , Humanos , Pediatría , Embarazo , Salud Reproductiva/ética , Salud Reproductiva/normas , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Crisis pregnancy centers (CPCs) attempt to dissuade pregnant people from considering abortion, often using misinformation and unethical practices. While mimicking health care clinics, CPCs provide biased, limited, and inaccurate health information, including incomplete pregnancy options counseling and unscientific sexual and reproductive health information. The centers do not provide or refer for abortion or contraception but often advertise in ways that give the appearance that they do provide these services without disclosing the biased nature and marked limitations of their services. Although individuals working in CPCs in the United States have First Amendment rights to free speech, their provision of misinformation might be harmful to young people and adults. The Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine and North American Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology support the following positions: (1) CPCs pose risk by failing to adhere to medical and ethical practice standards; (2) governments should only support health programs that provide accurate, comprehensive information; (3) CPCs and individuals who provide CPC services should be held to established standards of ethics and medical care; (4) schools should not outsource sexual education to CPCs or other entities that do not provide accurate and complete health information; (5) search engines and digital platforms should enforce policies against misleading advertising by CPCs; and (6) health professionals should educate themselves, and young people about CPCs and help young people identify safe, quality sources of sexual and reproductive health information and care.
Asunto(s)
Salud del Adolescente/normas , Intervención en la Crisis (Psiquiatría)/normas , Adhesión a Directriz , Ginecología/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Aborto Inducido/psicología , Adolescente , Niño , Comunicación , Consejo , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
In clinical practice, welfare checks have become a fairly common aspect of suicide prevention. At the same time, there is almost no guidance in the medical literature to inform clinicians under what circumstances welfare checks should be requested, how best to go about placing those requests, or how to document decision-making around this important subject. Literature searches spanning both PubMed and Google Scholar fail to yield any applicable results. Performed correctly, welfare checks have the potential to be life-saving interventions for persons in suicidal crises. Performed incorrectly, the welfare check may become an overly defensive practice that damages therapeutic relationships, violates patients' rights, and consumes important and limited community resources. The need for thoughtful guidance to assist clinicians in navigating these difficult clinical scenarios is long overdue. This article, the first in a 2-part series, will describe welfare checks and explore their potential risks and benefits.
Asunto(s)
Psiquiatría Preventiva , Gestión de Riesgos , Prevención del Suicidio , Suicidio , Intervención en la Crisis (Psiquiatría)/ética , Intervención en la Crisis (Psiquiatría)/métodos , Intervención en la Crisis (Psiquiatría)/normas , Revelación/ética , Indicadores de Salud , Humanos , Psiquiatría Preventiva/ética , Psiquiatría Preventiva/métodos , Psiquiatría Preventiva/normas , Medición de Riesgo , Gestión de Riesgos/ética , Gestión de Riesgos/métodos , Gestión de Riesgos/normas , Suicidio/psicologíaRESUMEN
Accumulating evidence supports the efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy for suicide prevention (CBT-SP) as an empirically supported treatment approach for suicidal patients. In light of these findings, several procedures pulled from CBT-SP have been recommended for standard care with suicidal patients. The present article provides an overview of the procedures used in CBT-SP and discusses how these procedures meet, or even exceed, standard of care expectations for outpatient mental healthcare clinicians. Finally, the relevance of clinician fidelity to the CBT-SP model when evaluating standard of care expectations is discussed.
Asunto(s)
Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/normas , Motivación , Nivel de Atención , Ideación Suicida , Prevención del Suicidio , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/métodos , Intervención en la Crisis (Psiquiatría)/métodos , Intervención en la Crisis (Psiquiatría)/normas , Ajuste Emocional , Humanos , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Planificación de Atención al Paciente/normas , Medición de Riesgo/normas , Autocuidado/métodos , Autocuidado/normas , Apoyo Social , Suicidio/psicología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) are frequently hospitalized within general psychiatric settings, which are not usually designed to meet their needs. An initial evaluation of a care pathway developed for youth with ASD receiving services in a general psychiatric inpatient unit (ASD-CP) showed promise in improving outcomes while using few resources (Kuriakose et al. in J Autism Dev Disord 48:4082-4089, 2018). As sustainability of inpatient psychiatric initiatives is imperative but rarely investigated, this study examined the stability of ASD-CP outcomes during an 18-month follow-up period (n = 15) compared to the 18-month initial evaluation (n = 20) and 18-month pre-implementation (n = 17) periods. Decreased use of crisis interventions, including holds/restraints and intramuscular medication use, was sustained in the 18 months after the initial implementation period. Implications and limitations are discussed.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno del Espectro Autista/psicología , Intervención en la Crisis (Psiquiatría)/métodos , Adolescente , Trastorno del Espectro Autista/terapia , Niño , Intervención en la Crisis (Psiquiatría)/normas , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Pacientes Internos , Masculino , Servicio de Psiquiatría en HospitalRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To determine the distribution, functioning and perceived impact of home-based treatment (HBT) teams for acute mental disorders on the island of Ireland. METHODS: A 28-item questionnaire exploring the structure, staffing and operation of HBT teams was emailed to all clinical directors of mental health services in Ireland (n=26) and Northern Ireland (NI) (n=5). Quantitative data was analysed using the Survey Monkey package, while free-text responses to open questions were analysed for thematic content. RESULTS: In total, 11 of 16 (68%) mental health services in Ireland and four of five (80%) in NI confirmed the presence of HBT teams. For 80% of respondents the primary function of HBT was as an alternative to inpatient admission. All NI respondents reported provision of a 24/7 HBT service. A 7 day a week service was reported by 82% of Republic of Ireland respondents. In total, 70% of respondents reported a gate-keeping role for their teams. Staffing levels and multidisciplinary representation varied widely. Most respondents perceived HBT as improving patient/carer experience and cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the implementation of the HBT model in Ireland has not fulfilled the aspirations set out in mental health policy in both Irish jurisdictions. Many areas have no HBT services while wide variations in staffing levels and functioning persist. However, mental health services with established HBT teams appear convinced of their positive impact. An All-Ireland forum on HBT may help to define the model in an Irish context and standardise its future resourcing, operation and evaluation.
Asunto(s)
Servicios Comunitarios de Salud Mental/organización & administración , Intervención en la Crisis (Psiquiatría)/normas , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Humanos , Irlanda del Norte , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Stressful situations during intraoperative emergencies have negative impact on human cognitive functions. Consequently, task performance may decrease and patient safety may be compromised. Cognitive aids can counteract these effects and support anesthesiologists in their crisis management. The Professional Association of German Anesthesiologists set up a project to develop a comprehensive set of digital cognitive aids for intraoperative emergencies. A parallel development for several software platforms and stationary and mobile devices will accommodate the inhomogeneity of the information technology infrastructure within German anesthesia departments. OBJECTIVE: This paper aimed to provide a detailed overview of how the task of developing a digital cognitive aid for intraoperative crisis management in anesthesia was addressed that meets user requirements and is highly user-friendly. METHODS: A user-centered design (UCD) process was conducted to identify, specify, and supplement the requirements for a digital cognitive aid. The study covered 4 aspects: analysis of the context of use, specification of user requirements, development of design solutions, and evaluation of design solutions. Three prototypes were developed and evaluated by end users of the application. Following each evaluation, the new requirements were prioritized and used for redesign. For the first and third prototype, the System Usability Scale (SUS) score was determined. The second prototype was evaluated with an extensive Web-based questionnaire. The evaluation of the third prototype included a think-aloud protocol. RESULTS: The chosen methods enabled a comprehensive collection of requirements and helped to improve the design of the application. The first prototype achieved an average SUS score of 74 (SD 12), indicating good usability. The second prototype included the following main revisions: 2-column layout, initial selection of patient type (infant, adult, or parturient), 4 offered search options, and the option to check off completed action steps. Its evaluation identified the following major revision points: add quick selection for resuscitation checklists, design the top bar and tabs slightly larger, and add more pictograms to the text. The third prototype achieved an average SUS score of 77 (SD 15). The evaluation of the think-aloud protocol revealed a good intuitiveness of the application and identified a missing home button as the main issue. CONCLUSIONS: Anesthesiology-as an acute medical field-is particularly characterized by its high demands on decision making and action in dynamic, or time-critical situations. The integration of usability aspects is essential for everyday and emergency suitability. The UCD process allowed us to develop a prototypical digital cognitive aid, exhibiting high usability and user satisfaction in the demanding environment of anesthesiological emergencies. Both aspects are essential to increase the acceptance of the application in later stages. The study approach, combining different methods for determining user requirements, may be useful for other implementation projects in a highly demanding environment.
Asunto(s)
Servicio de Anestesia en Hospital/métodos , Intervención en la Crisis (Psiquiatría)/instrumentación , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/terapia , Aplicaciones Móviles/normas , Diseño de Software , Servicio de Anestesia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Intervención en la Crisis (Psiquiatría)/métodos , Intervención en la Crisis (Psiquiatría)/normas , Humanos , Internet , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/psicología , Aplicaciones Móviles/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Interfaz Usuario-ComputadorRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Disclosure is a difficult but important process for victims of child maltreatment. There is limited research on child maltreatment disclosure. Young people have been reluctant to disclose victimization to adults, but short message service (SMS) crisis services may represent one novel method of engaging young people around sensitive topics. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine characteristics of child maltreatment disclosure to an SMS-based crisis service. METHODS: We conducted a content analysis of all conversations (N=244) that resulted in a mandatory report by an SMS-based crisis service between October 2015 and July 2017. We coded characteristics of the disclosure process, including the reason for initial contact, phrase used to disclose abuse, perpetrator, type of abuse, and length of victimization. After identifying terms used by young people to disclose child abuse, we randomly selected and analyzed 50 conversations using those terms to determine if use of the terms differed between conversations that did and did not result in mandatory report. RESULTS: Parents were the most common perpetrator. Physical abuse was the most common form of abuse discussed in the initial abuse disclosure (106/244, 43.4%), followed by psychological abuse (83/244, 34.0%), sexual abuse (38/244, 15.6%), and neglect (15/244, 6.1%). More than half of the texters discussed abuse or other significant family issues in the first message. An explicit description of the experience or definite language, such as abuse, rape, and molested, was common in disclosures. CONCLUSIONS: Early disclosure, combined with explicit language, may suggest at least a portion of young victims are actively seeking safe ways to talk about their experiences with abuse, rather than incidentally sharing experiences while seeking support for other issues. SMS text messaging may be a valuable way to engage with young people around sensitive topics, but these approaches will require careful consideration in their development, implementation, and evaluation to ensure a positive experience for young people.
Asunto(s)
Maltrato a los Niños/diagnóstico , Maltrato a los Niños/psicología , Intervención en la Crisis (Psiquiatría)/métodos , Envío de Mensajes de Texto/instrumentación , Revelación de la Verdad , Adolescente , Niño , Víctimas de Crimen/psicología , Intervención en la Crisis (Psiquiatría)/instrumentación , Intervención en la Crisis (Psiquiatría)/normas , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Notificación Obligatoria , Envío de Mensajes de Texto/normas , Envío de Mensajes de Texto/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
In January 2015, in accordance with decades of scientific work based on maintaining contact, was born an innovative device for suicide prevention: VigilanS. To ensure this link, the choice was made to build a team with an equal number of nurses and psychologists, all located within the medical regulation. Nowadays, they are named "VigilanSeur": an original entity that highlights the emergence of this new profession, at the crossroads of several disciplines.
Asunto(s)
Empleos Relacionados con Salud/tendencias , Intervención en la Crisis (Psiquiatría) , Monitoreo Fisiológico/métodos , Psiquiatría Preventiva , Prevención del Suicidio , Intervención en la Crisis (Psiquiatría)/educación , Intervención en la Crisis (Psiquiatría)/organización & administración , Intervención en la Crisis (Psiquiatría)/normas , Intervención en la Crisis (Psiquiatría)/tendencias , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/métodos , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/organización & administración , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/normas , Empleos en Salud/tendencias , Líneas Directas/organización & administración , Líneas Directas/normas , Líneas Directas/provisión & distribución , Humanos , Monitoreo Fisiológico/normas , Servicios Preventivos de Salud/organización & administración , Servicios Preventivos de Salud/provisión & distribución , Psiquiatría Preventiva/educación , Psiquiatría Preventiva/métodos , Psiquiatría Preventiva/organización & administración , Psiquiatría Preventiva/tendencias , Psicoterapia Breve/educación , Psicoterapia Breve/métodos , Psicoterapia Breve/organización & administración , Psicoterapia Breve/tendencias , Suicidio/psicología , TeléfonoAsunto(s)
Intervención en la Crisis (Psiquiatría) , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Triaje , Intervención en la Crisis (Psiquiatría)/métodos , Intervención en la Crisis (Psiquiatría)/organización & administración , Intervención en la Crisis (Psiquiatría)/normas , Enfermería de Urgencia/organización & administración , Enfermería de Urgencia/normas , Socorristas , Humanos , Incidentes con Víctimas en Masa , Triaje/organización & administración , Triaje/normasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Crisis resolution teams (CRTs) can provide effective home-based treatment for acute mental health crises, although critical ingredients of the model have not been clearly identified, and implementation has been inconsistent. In order to inform development of a more highly specified CRT model that meets service users' needs, this study used qualitative methods to investigate stakeholders' experiences and views of CRTs, and what is important in good quality home-based crisis care. METHOD: Semi-structured interviews and focus groups were conducted with service users (n = 41), carers (n = 20) and practitioners (CRT staff, managers and referrers; n = 147, 26 focus groups, 9 interviews) in 10 mental health catchment areas in England, and with international CRT developers (n = 11). Data were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Three domains salient to views about optimal care were identified. 1. The organisation of CRT care: Providing a rapid initial responses, and frequent home visits from the same staff were seen as central to good care, particularly by service users and carers. Being accessible, reliable, and having some flexibility were also valued. Negative experiences of some referral pathways, and particularly lack of staff continuity were identified as problematic. 2. The content of CRT work: Emotional support was at the centre of service users' experiences. All stakeholder groups thought CRTs should involve the whole family, and offer a range of interventions. However, carers often feel excluded, and medication is often prioritised over other forms of support. 3. The role of CRTs within the care system: Gate-keeping admissions is seen as a key role for CRTs within the acute care system. Service users and carers report that recovery is quicker compared to in-patient care. Lack of knowledge and misunderstandings about CRTs among referrers are common. Overall, levels of stakeholder agreement about the critical ingredients of good crisis care were high, although aspects of this were not always seen as achievable. CONCLUSIONS: Stakeholders' views about optimal CRT care suggest that staff continuity, carer involvement, and emotional and practical support should be prioritised in service improvements and more clearly specified CRT models.
Asunto(s)
Intervención en la Crisis (Psiquiatría)/normas , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio/normas , Trastornos Mentales/psicología , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Adulto , Cuidadores/psicología , Áreas de Influencia de Salud , Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente/normas , Intervención en la Crisis (Psiquiatría)/métodos , Inglaterra , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Implementación de Plan de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Investigación CualitativaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Experiencing mental ill health adds a layer of complexity for individuals in touch with the justice system and for those responsible for working in the justice service with these individuals, such as frontline police officers. In England and Wales, there are three commonly used but not necessarily commonly designed or operated, mental health interventions associated with policing, Liaison and Diversion, Street Triage and specialist staff embedded in Police Contact Control Rooms. A fourth US designed model, Crisis Intervention Teams (CITs), is now attracting some interest in England and Wales, and these four are to be considered in this review. A fifth intervention, Mental Health Courts, was trialed but has now been abandoned in England and Wales and so has been excluded, but remains in use elsewhere. In recent years, there has been an increase in the level of investment related to these intervention options. This has largely been without an evidence base being available to aid design, structure, and consistency of approach. The review will address this gap and provide a systematic review of each of these options. This will provide a baseline of research evidence for those who commission and provide services for individuals experiencing mental ill health and who are in contact with the justice system. METHODS: Twenty-nine relevant databases and sources have been selected which will be systematically searched to locate relevant studies. These studies have to meet the set inclusion criteria which require them to report an objective outcome measure(s) in respect of offending or mental health outcomes and to have an experimental or quasi-experimental design including a comparator group(s) or a pre/post comparison. The review will exclude PhD theses, papers in non-English languages and papers published prior to 1980. Keywords have been collected through canvassing experts' opinion, literature review, controlled vocabulary and reviewing the results of a primary scoping review carried out to aid the development of the PICO, composed of Population/Participants, Intervention/Indicator, Comparator/Control, and Outcomes. For the proposed review, the key elements of the PICO are the following: persons with mental health problems, symptoms or diagnoses who come into contact with the police; interventions involving partnership working between police and mental health nurses and related professionals to divert those with mental health problems away from criminal justice processes; comparisons with control groups or areas where such interventions have not been introduced; and outcomes concerning criminal justice and health outcomes. The results of the searches will be screened using the set criteria and the selected papers reviewed and analysed to allow findings regarding these interventions to be reported. DISCUSSION: The objectives of the review are firstly to identify and report research on the relevant interventions, nationally and internationally and then secondly to consider, when possible, which interventions or aspects of those interventions are effective. This is judged with regard to changes in mental health status or service use and future offending behaviour. The approaches to be considered have gained a good deal of support and funding over recent years, and this review will provide a systematic review of the underpinning research evidence to inform future commissioning, service design and investment decisions.