Bases neurales de la toma de decisiones e implicación de las emociones en el proceso / The neural basis of the decision-making and emotional processes involved / Bases neurais da tomada de decisão e implicação das emoções neste processo

Este artículo se ha propuesto como una revisión de las investigaciones que han surgido en la última década en el campo de la neurociencia, y que se hayan relacionadas con la actividad neurobiológica y funcional de la toma de decisiones por parte del ser humano. Así, ha sido posible identificar y dar cuenta de las estructuras del sistema nervioso central que son claves en la comprensión de los procesos relacionados con la toma de decisiones, y a su vez han permitido establecer el rol de las emociones como influencia determinante en este proceso. De igual forma, las investigaciones han posibilitado conocer cómo se lleva a cabo la actividad de tomar decisiones en el cerebro, las relaciones entre las diversas regiones y cómo las emociones guían el resultado.Además, se ha llegado a destacar dos sistemas que explicarían el proceso de la toma de decisiones, uno asociado a la intuición (sistema práctico), donde se destaca la actividad metabólica de la amígdala cerebral y sus redes neuronales; otro que corresponde al razonamiento (sistema analítico), en el cual resalta la participación de las conexiones neuronales de la porción ventromedial del córtex prefrontal.

This paper has proposedas a review of the researchthat has been appearing in the last decade in the field of neuroscience, and the relationship with the neurobiological and functional activity of the human decision making. Therefore, it has been possible to identify and inform the key structures of the central nervous system in the comprehension of the related processes, and it has allowed to stablish the important influence of the emotion in this process. Also, the research hasallowed to know how the decision-making process has been referred in the brain, the relationship between the different brain regions and the emotion who led the outcome. Thus, there are two systems involved in the decision makingprocess; one related with the intuition (practical system), where the metabolic activity of the cerebral amygdala is remarked with their neural networks, and other related with reasoning (analytical system), in which, is important to note the involvement of the ventromedial portion of the prefrontal cortex.

Este artigo foi proposto como uma revisão das pesquisas que surgiram na última década no campo da neurociência, e que tem sido relacionada à atividade neurobiológica e funcional da tomada de decisão pelo ser humano. Assim, foi possível identificar e explicar as estruturas do sistema nervoso central que são fundamentais na compreensão dos processos relacionados à tomada de decisões e, por sua vez, permitiram estabelecer o papel das emoções como influência determinante nesse processo. Da mesma forma, a pesquisa permitiu saber como é a atividade de tomada de decisão no cérebro, as relações entre diferentes regiões e como as emoções orientam o resultado. Ademais, foram destacados dois sistemas que explicam o processo de tomada de decisão, um associado à intuição (sistema prático), que enfatiza a atividade metabólica da amígdala cerebral e suas redes neurais; outro correspondente ao raciocínio (sistema analítico), no qual as conexões neuronais da porção ventromedial do córtex pré-frontal são destacadas.

An MD-PhD program in Brazil: students’ concepts of science and of common sense

In 1995, a pioneering MD-PhD program was initiated in Brazil for the training of medical scientists in experimental sciences at the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro. The program’s aim was achieved with respect to publication of theses in the form of papers with international visibility and also in terms of fostering the scientific careers of the graduates. The expansion of this type of program is one of the strategies for improving the preparation of biomedical researchers in Brazil. A noteworthy absence of interest in carrying out clinical research limits the ability of young Brazilian physicians to solve biomedical problems. To understand the students’ views of science, we used qualitative and quantitative triangulation methods, as well as participant observation to evaluate the students’ concepts of science and common sense. Subjective aspects were clearly less evident in their concepts of science. There was a strong concern about "methodology", "truth" and "usefulness". "Intuition", "creativity" and "curiosity" were the least mentioned thematic categories. Students recognized the value of intuition when it appeared as an explicit option but they did not refer to it spontaneously. Common sense was associated with "consensus", "opinion" and ideas that "require scientific validation". Such observations indicate that MD-PhD students share with their senior academic colleagues the same reluctance to consider common sense as a valid adjunct for the solution of scientific problems. Overcoming this difficulty may be an important step toward stimulating the interest of physicians in pursuing experimental research.

An MD-PhD program in Brazil: students' concepts of science and of common sense.

In 1995, a pioneering MD-PhD program was initiated in Brazil for the training of medical scientists in experimental sciences at the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro. The program's aim was achieved with respect to publication of theses in the form of papers with international visibility and also in terms of fostering the scientific careers of the graduates. The expansion of this type of program is one of the strategies for improving the preparation of biomedical researchers in Brazil. A noteworthy absence of interest in carrying out clinical research limits the ability of young Brazilian physicians to solve biomedical problems. To understand the students' views of science, we used qualitative and quantitative triangulation methods, as well as participant observation to evaluate the students' concepts of science and common sense. Subjective aspects were clearly less evident in their concepts of science. There was a strong concern about "methodology", "truth" and "usefulness". "Intuition", "creativity" and "curiosity" were the least mentioned thematic categories. Students recognized the value of intuition when it appeared as an explicit option but they did not refer to it spontaneously. Common sense was associated with "consensus", "opinion" and ideas that "require scientific validation". Such observations indicate that MD-PhD students share with their senior academic colleagues the same reluctance to consider common sense as a valid adjunct for the solution of scientific problems. Overcoming this difficulty may be an important step toward stimulating the interest of physicians in pursuing experimental research.