Efficiency and Safety of Aftercare With Intrathecal Baclofen on Location.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with intractable spasticity treated with intrathecal baclofen (ITB) need regular evaluation and aftercare in an outpatient clinic or pain clinic setting. Logistically, this can be challenging. A solution could be to perform treatment at the patient's home setting. In the Netherlands, a project of the Dutch Healthcare Authority was initiated to deliver ambulatory ITB-related services via a home-based Ambulant Care Clinic. This aftercare is performed by nurse practitioners (NP) with support from a medical specialist. The scope of the study was to investigate the efficiency and safety of ITB-care for patients with severe disabling spasticity in their home setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. Patients with congenital or acquired spasticity were treated with ITB (1st April 2011 to January 1st 2016) using an implanted programmable pump system were referred to the home-based Ambulant Care Clinic by various neuromodulation centers in the Netherlands. All study parameters were a part of the standard intake and follow-up documentation. RESULTS: Of the 900 patients treated with ITB in the Netherlands, 239 were referred to the home-based Ambulant Care Clinic and included in this study. Mean age was 45.5 (range 7-82) years; 52% lived at home; the average satisfaction score was 9 (scale 0-10); and 0.29% had (serious) adverse events (60% of clinical manifestations were prevented by remote double-check control). Certifications for patient safety and quality standards were obtained. CONCLUSIONS: The concept of ITB aftercare on location demonstrated efficacy and safety in the described setting. For troubleshooting, close collaboration with a neuromodulation center is necessary and can be arranged in chain-based care.

Intrathecal Baclofen Therapy in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis: Improved Outcomes and Reduced Costs Through Identification of Catheter Malfunction.

INTRODUCTION: Two patients previously implanted with intrathecal Baclofen (ITB) pumps for management of intractable spasticity due to multiple sclerosis (MS) were referred to our center for ongoing management of their spasticity. Initial evaluation of these patients revealed high levels of spasticity in the presence of ITB doses 10 times the average daily dose of our other MS patients. CLINICAL FACTS: High doses of ITB required frequent clinical visits and result in high drug and procedure costs. Both patients' daily doses were greater than 1000 mcg/day resulting in clinical visits every 1-2 months with drug and procedure costs ranging from 16 to 23 thousand dollars annually based on Medicare national average pricing for physician's office. Of the 59 MS patients receiving ITB therapy at our institution, the mean, median, and mode daily doses for ITB are 184, 115, and 159 mcg/day, respectively. The high ITB doses in these patients and poor spasticity control raised suspicion for pump/catheter malfunction and prompted immediate troubleshooting. FINDINGS: One patient's catheter was found to be disconnected from the pump and the other's catheter tip was outside the intrathecal space. In both cases, the patients were not receiving the therapy. After pump/catheter replacement, both patients received excellent clinical benefits from ITB at significantly lower daily doses. This reduction in dose resulted in decreased frequency of medication refills (twice annually) which resulted in decreased cost of care (12-19 thousand dollars savings annually per patient). DISCUSSION: These cases illustrate the need for early ITB pump troubleshooting to identify catheter problems, improve efficacy, and avoid unnecessary healthcare costs.

Perioperative and Periprocedural Care of Patients With Intrathecal Pump Therapy.

INTRODUCTION: There are an ever-increasing number of patients who have implanted devices for targeted delivery of drug therapy to the intrathecal space for the management of spasticity or chronic pain. This leads to a growing number of people with implanted pumps presenting for procedures and surgeries, yet there is a paucity of consolidated information available to describe the appropriate precautions and patient management during this period. METHODS: This was a systematic review to provide a summary of existing literature on intrathecal drug delivery system (IDDS) management in the perioperative and procedural period, and to highlight additional areas that require further research. Topics addressed include the time surrounding magnetic resonance imaging, defibrillation, radiation therapy, high output ultrasound, lithotripsy, ablation, diathermy, electroconvulsive therapy, and the perioperative period, all of which have their own specific considerations. RESULTS: A total of 42 articles met criteria to be included in this review. Inclusion criteria were English language, and that the article was primarily focused on the perioperative or periprocedural management of IDDSs. Exclusion criteria included commentaries, surveys, published abstracts, or articles that did not discuss the perioperative or periprocedural care of IDDS. CONCLUSION: Our article outlined perioperative considerations when dealing with a patient with intrathecal pump undergoing surgical or imaging modality.

Refill Procedures of Intrathecal Drug Delivery Systems With a Recessed Fill Port on the Pump Surface: A Prospective Comparison Study of Ultrasound-Guided vs. Blind Refill Technique.

OBJECTIVES: Structural differences of implantable drug delivery systems (IDDSs) might have an impact on the efficiency of needle access to the reservoir fill port (RFP). The aim of this study was to assess the efficiency of RFP needle access with an ultrasound (US)-guided vs. a blind refill technique in IDDSs with a Recessed RFP (Recessed-RFP-IDDS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The primary outcome was the number of attempts needed to enter the RFP with a needle comparing the US-guided technique vs. the blind refill technique. The time to enter the RFP with the needle was a secondary outcome. We compared the amount of attempts between both techniques with the non-parametric Wilcoxon rank sum test. RESULTS: Fourteen adult patients underwent a total of 75 refills of their Recessed-RFP-IDDS during a period of 24 months. The median number of attempts to enter the RFP did not differ significantly between the US-guided technique and the blind refill technique (2.0 (IQR: 1-5) vs. 1.5 (IQR: 1-5.0), p = 0.572). The median time to enter the RFP with the needle did not differ significantly between both techniques (35.0 sec (IQR: 26.0-58.0) vs. 41.0 sec (IQR: 25.5-46.8), p = 0.878). CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that there is no difference in the RFP needle access efficiency between the US-guided and the blind refill technique in superficially located Recessed-RFP-IDDSs, if performed by experienced practitioners. However, the study did not address efficiency of the RFP needle access in IDDSs with aberrancy in pump location or refills performed by inexperienced staff.

Standardized Method for Intra-Cisterna Magna Delivery Under Fluoroscopic Guidance in Nonhuman Primates.

Intrathecal delivery of adeno-associated virus vectors and other therapeutics are currently being evaluated for the treatment of central nervous system sequelae of lysosomal storage diseases, motor neuron diseases, and neurodegenerative diseases. As products transition from preclinical to clinical studies, a standardized and clinically relevant method of intrathecal delivery is increasingly germane. Here, we describe a method of intrathecal delivery via suboccipital puncture into the cisterna magna under fluoroscopic guidance in nonhuman primates. This procedure is suitable for use in good laboratory practice compliant studies, has an excellent safety profile, and is highly similar to the procedure currently being explored for use in humans.

Management of a Cancer Patient with an Intrathecal Drug Delivery System and an Acute Brain Abscess.

Surgical-site infection, spinal cord abscess, and catheter tip granuloma are known but rare complications of intrathecal drug delivery systems (IDDS). To date, there are no published cases of brain abscess in a patient with an IDDS. In this study, we report a case of a cancer patient with an IDDS for management of cancer pain who developed a brain abscess with profound mental status changes and clinical management challenges.

Infections of Intrathecal Baclofen Delivery Systems and Ventriculoperitoneal Shunting Systems: Clinical Series Discussion.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The physiological interaction between the intrathecal baclofen (ITB) delivery system and the ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunting system in a patient who had both systems implanted has not been reported previously. The aim of our report is to evaluate the effect that one system's infection might have on the other. METHODS: Records of children who were followed at our institution between 2004 and 2015 for management of their ITB systems were reviewed. In this group, children who had VP shunts were identified, and those who had any of their ITB or VP systems infected were included. RESULTS: Out of 313 children managed with ITB therapy at our institution, 31 (24%) children had VP shunts. Two patients had infection in both systems, and 3 patients had infection in 1 system. CONCLUSION: This report suggests that if aspiration from both systems showed positive cultures, the treatment would be removal of both systems. If the primarily not infected system does not show positive cultures, it does not need to be removed. Close follow-up is recommended, and any sign of infection or malfunction of the primarily not infected device should be approached with a high level of suspicion.

Continuing Anti-thrombotic Medication During Low-to-Intermediate Risk Spinal Procedures: A Retrospective Evaluation.

BACKGROUND: The current American Society of Regional Anesthesia (ASRA) guidelines recommend discontinuing anti-thrombotic therapy prior to any interventional spine procedures to decrease the incidence of bleeding complications. However, discontinuing anti-thrombotics may pose considerable danger in terms of cerebrovascular and cardiovascular events. Recent evidence suggests that some spinal interventions may still be performed safely with anti-thrombotics on board and some practitioners thus elect to continue certain anti-thrombotics for these procedures. OBJECTIVE: To assess the rate of adverse events in patients undergoing spine procedures that are currently classified by the ASRA guidelines as "low-to-intermediate bleeding risk," while being on continued anti-thrombotic therapy. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Interventional pain management practice. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on patients who underwent low-to-intermediate risk spine procedures with variable anti-thrombotic medications continued throughout the course of treatment. RESULTS: Between October 2015 and May 2016, out of 2,204 patients who underwent low-to-intermediate risk spine procedures, we identified 490 patients on anti-thrombotic medications. These included aspirin (N = 275), P2Y12 inhibitors (N = 129), warfarin (N = 62), heparin (N = 10), factor Xa inhibitors (N = 55), and dipyridamole (N = 1). Forty-two patients were on multiple anti-thrombotics. Anti-thrombotics were continued throughout the procedure for 467 of 490 patients (88%). One bleeding complication (injection site bleeding) occurred in a patient that continued clopidogrel and aspirin during a lumbar radiofrequency ablation. We encountered no bleeding complications attributable to anti-thrombotics in the other 466 procedures in which anti-thrombotics were continued during lumbar (N = 260), thoracic (N = 18), and cervical (N = 40) medial branch injections, sacroiliac injections (N = 47), and during lumbar (N = 87) thoracic (N = 2), and cervical (N = 12) medial branch radiofrequency ablations. LIMITATIONS: The retrospective nature of the study and its reliance on electronic medical records are potential limitations. CONCLUSIONS: Continuing anti-thrombotic medication during medial branch and sacroiliac injections may be possible. KEY WORDS: Interventional pain management, thrombotic complications, hemostasis, anti-coagulation, bleeding complications.

The Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference (PACC): Recommendations on Intrathecal Drug Infusion Systems Best Practices and Guidelines.

INTRODUCTION: Pain treatment is best performed when a patient-centric, safety-based philosophy is used to determine an algorithmic process to guide care. Since 2007, the International Neuromodulation Society has organized a group of experts to evaluate evidence and create a Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference (PACC) to guide practice. METHODS: The current PACC update was designed to address the deficiencies and innovations emerging since the previous PACC publication of 2012. An extensive literature search identified publications between January 15, 2007 and November 22, 2015 and authors contributed additional relevant sources. After reviewing the literature, the panel convened to determine evidence levels and degrees of recommendations for intrathecal therapy. This meeting served as the basis for consensus development, which was ranked as strong, moderate or weak. Algorithms were developed for intrathecal medication choices to treat nociceptive and neuropathic pain for patients with cancer, terminal illness, and noncancer pain, with either localized or diffuse pain. RESULTS: The PACC has developed an algorithmic process for several aspects of intrathecal drug delivery to promote safe and efficacious evidence-based care. Consensus opinion, based on expertise, was used to fill gaps in evidence. Thirty-one consensus points emerged from the panel considerations. CONCLUSION: New algorithms and guidance have been established to improve care with the use of intrathecal drug delivery.

The Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference (PACC): Recommendations for Trialing of Intrathecal Drug Delivery Infusion Therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Intrathecal (IT) drug infusion is an appropriate and necessary tool in the algorithm to treat refractory cancer and noncancer pain. The decision-making steps/methodology for selecting appropriate patients for implanted targeted drug delivery systems is controversial and complicated. Therefore, a consensus on best practices for determining appropriate use of IT drug infusion may involve testing/trialing this therapy before implantation. METHODS: This current Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference (PACC) update was designed to address the deficiencies and emerging innovations since the previous PACC convened in 2012. A literature search identified publications available since the previous PACC publications in 2014, and relevant sources were contributed by the PACC members. After reviewing the literature, the panel determined the evidence levels and degrees of recommendations. The developed consensus was ranked as strong (>80%), moderate (50-79%), or weak (<49%). RESULTS: The trialing for IT drug delivery systems (IDDS) remains an area of continued controversy. The PACC recommendations for trialing are presented in 34 consensus points and cover trialing for morphine, ziconotide, and medication admixtures; starting doses and titration practices; measurements of success; trial settings and monitoring; management of systemic opioids during trialing; and the role of psychological evaluation. Finally, the PACC describes clinical scenarios in which IT trialing is required or not required. CONCLUSION: The PACC provides consensus guidance on best practices of trialing for IDDS implants. In addition, the PACC recommends that no trial may be required in certain patient populations.

The Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference (PACC): Recommendations for Intrathecal Drug Delivery: Guidance for Improving Safety and Mitigating Risks.

INTRODUCTION: Intrathecal therapy is an important part of the pain treatment algorithm for chronic disease states. The use of this option is a viable treatment strategy, but it is inherent for pain physicians to understand risk assessment and mitigation. In this manuscript, we explore evidence and mitigating strategies to improve safety with intrathecal therapy. METHODS: A robust literature search was performed covering January 2011 to October 9, 2016, in PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, Biomed Central, Google Scholar, Current Contents Connect, and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts. The information was cross-referenced and compiled for evidence, analysis, and consensus review, with the intent to offer weighted recommendations and consensus statements on safety for targeted intrathecal therapy delivery. RESULTS: The Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference has made several best practice recommendations to improve care and reduce morbidity and mortality associated with intrathecal therapy through all phases of management. The United States Prevention Service Task Force evidence level and consensus strength assessments are offered for each recommendation. CONCLUSION: Intrathecal therapy is a viable and relatively safe option for the treatment of cancer- and noncancer-related pain. Continued research and expert opinion are required to improve our current pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic model of intrathecal drug delivery, as this will undoubtedly improve safety and efficacy.

Solubility and Stability of Baclofen 3 mg/mL Intrathecal Formulation and Its Compatibility With Implantable Programmable Intrathecal Infusion Systems.

BACKGROUND: Commercial baclofen formulations used with infusion pumps are available at therapeutic concentrations of 0.5-2.0 mg/mL. However, patients who receive higher daily doses of baclofen may benefit from products with greater baclofen concentrations since their refill frequency would be reduced (up to a maximum of 180 days). We evaluated baclofen solubility, baclofen 3 mg/mL intrathecal (IT) formulation stability, and chemical and physical compatibility with Medtronic SynchroMed® II and Codman Medstream® programmable IT infusion pumps. METHODS: For solubility evaluations, baclofen powder was dissolved into isotonic saline and tested at 5°C, 25°C, and 40°C. To demonstrate drug product stability, both physical and chemical stability attributes of baclofen 3 mg/mL in prefilled syringes were evaluated over 36 months with storage at 25°C. For a simulated in-use stability (compatibility) study, a 3 mg/mL baclofen IT formulation was placed in SynchroMed II and Codman Medstream pumps at 37ºC for study durations, and evaluated at different flow rates. Pump effluent was collected at various times and analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography for baclofen content. On completion of the in-use stability study, pumps exposed to baclofen 3 mg/mL were dissected and visually evaluated for signs of deterioration. RESULTS: Baclofen solubility was found to be 3.2 mg/mL at 5°C, 3.6 mg/mL at 25°C, and 3.9 mg/mL at 40°C. During the 36-month stability study of prefilled syringes stored at 25°C, baclofen content remained unchanged and no precipitation was observed. The simulated in-use pump study performed at 37ºC showed that a baclofen 3 mg/mL IT formulation was stable at different flow rates and throughout different expected residence times for both pump models. Components from both pumps exhibited no noticeable deterioration after exposure to the 3 mg/mL formulation. CONCLUSION: Baclofen 3 mg/mL IT formulation was stable during long-term storage at 25°C and remained stable under conditions matching those encountered in clinical practice (37°C).

Best Practices for Intrathecal Baclofen Therapy: Dosing and Long-Term Management.

INTRODUCTION: Intrathecal baclofen (ITB) therapy aims to reduce spasticity and provide functional control. METHOD: An expert panel consulted on best practices. RESULTS: Pump fill and drug delivery can be started intraoperatively, with monitoring for at least eight hours. Initiate with the 500 mcg/mL concentration. The starting daily dose should be twice the effective bolus screening dose, or the screening dose if the patient had a prolonged response (greater than eight hours) or negative reactions. Oral antispasmodics can be weaned, one drug at a time beginning with oral baclofen after ITB begins. Assessment should occur within 24 hours of a dose change. For adults, daily dose increases may be 5% to 15% once every 24 hours for cerebral-origin spasticity and 10% to 30% once every 24 hours for spinal-origin spasticity. Daily dose increases can be 5% to 15% once every 24 hours for children. Inpatients should be assessed at least every 24 hours and receive rehabilitation. Step dosing can be used for outpatients who cannot return daily. Dosing options include simple continuous dosing, variable 24-hour flex dosing, or regularly scheduled boluses. Patients/caregivers should understand the care plan, responsibilities, and possible side-effects. Low-reservoir alarm dates and refill schedules should be written down, along with emergency contact information. A higher concentration at refill can extend refill intervals, and a bridge bolus must be programmed. Time changes may affect flex dosing. Pump replacement should be scheduled at least three months in advance. CONCLUSIONS: ITB dosing is multistep and individualized.

The Development and Validation of a Quality Assessment and Rating of Technique for Injections of the Spine (AQUARIUS).

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Systematic reviews evaluate the utility of procedural interventions of the spine, including epidural steroid injections (ESIs). However, existing quality assessment tools either fail to account for proper technical quality and patient selection or are not validated. We developed and validated a simple scale for ESIs to provide a quality assessment and rating of technique for injections of the spine (AQUARIUS). METHODS: Seven experts generated items iteratively based on prior ESI technique studies and professional judgment. Following testing for face and content validity, a 17-item instrument was used by 8 raters from 2 different backgrounds to assess 12 randomized controlled trials, selected from 3 different categories. Using frequency of assessment, a 12-item instrument was also generated. Both instruments underwent reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient), validity (ability to distinguish "low," "random," and "high" study categories), and diagnostic accuracy (receiver operating characteristics) testing. RESULTS: Both 17- and 12-item instruments were scored consistently by raters regardless of background, with overall intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.72 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.53-0.89) and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.51-0.89), respectively. Both instruments discriminated between clinical trials from all 3 categories. Diagnostic accuracy was similar for the 2 instruments, with areas under receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.89 (95% CI, 0.82-0.96) and 0.90 (95% CI, 0.82-0.97), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The instrument in both 17- and 12-item formats demonstrates good reliability and diagnostic accuracy in rating ESI studies. As a complement to other tools that assess bias, the instrument may improve the ability to evaluate evidence for systematic reviews and improve clinical trial design.

Intrathecal Analgesia for Chronic Refractory Pain: Current and Future Prospects.

The intrathecal drug-delivery system (IDDS) is one mode of infusing analgesic medications directly into the cerebrospinal fluid in close proximity to their site of action. This modality has been employed in patients with refractory pain either due to malignant or non-malignant causes for over 30 years. Unfortunately, and despite the number of years it has been in use, there is still a scarcity of rigorous evidence to guide its integration into clinical practice. Current best evidence is inconclusive as to the comparative effectiveness and harms of the IDDS relative to routine medical care of patients. There are far more systematic reviews than high-quality primary comparative studies of the IDDS vs. conventional pain treatment. Existing clinical practice recommendations are best viewed as expert opinion with competing interests. This article will review the existing literature for indications, contraindications, consensus statements, different technologies, and complications of the IDDS. Although approved analgesics for IDDS delivery are limited to morphine and ziconotide, many other analgesics, alone or in combination, are routinely used in this setting. This review will also focus on the pharmacology, clinical efficacy, and safety of intrathecal medications extensively used in clinical practice; including agents approved, unapproved, and under development.

A Prospective, Randomized, Single-Blinded, Head-to-Head Long-Term Outcome Study, Comparing Intrathecal (IT) Boluses With Continuous Infusion Trialing Techniques Prior to Implantation of Drug Delivery Systems (DDS) for the Treatment of Severe Intractable Chronic Nonmalignant Pain.

OBJECTIVE: The study aims to compare intrathecal (IT) boluses to continuous infusion trialing techniques prior to implantation of drug delivery systems (DDS) for the treatment of severe intractable chronic nonmalignant pain. DESIGN: This is a prospective, randomized, head-to-head long-term outcome study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty patients with comparable patient demographics were randomly assigned to two cohorts. Cohort A trialed with intermittent boluses; Cohort B trialed with continuous infusion. One patient failed trial in each group. Nineteen patients were implanted in each group. Follow-up was for 36 months with intervals at 6, 12, 18, 24, 36 months. The Brief Pain Inventory was used was used for assessment. OUTCOME MEASURES: We used the Brief Pain Inventory to measure pain (worst and average), physical function (walking, normal work, and general activity), behavioral function (mood, sleep, and relations with others), IT dose, and oral opioid use. RESULTS: We observed statistically significant reduction in pain and improvement of function in both cohorts following DDS implantation throughout the observation period. The IT dose remained virtually unchanged throughout as well, with overall limited dose escalation. Oral opioid use was significantly reduced. There was no statistically significant difference in prediction of trial success or long-term outcomes between the two cohorts. CONCLUSION: Low-dose IT opioids via DDS can provide significant and long-lasting reduction in pain, and improvement in function (physical and behavioral) for patients with chronic nonmalignant pain. The two trialing techniques tested, intermittent boluses, and continuous infusion delivered intrathecally showed no clinical significance difference in terms of predicting trial success or long-term outcomes.

Standardization of health care provider competencies for intrathecal access procedures.

INTRODUCTION: This quality improvement (QI) project addresses a method for experienced health care providers to maintain skill-based competence for intrathecal access procedures. METHODS: A prospective QI design using intrathecal access simulation to assess, educate, and evaluate skill competency. Simulation was used as a strategy to promote patient safety and standardize practice patterns. Pretest and posttest methodology using paired t tests were performed to assess anxiety, confidence, and knowledge. RESULTS: Fourteen pediatric providers participated in this QI project. There was a statistically significant improvement in confidence measuring intracranial pressure (ICP; t = -2.92, P = .013), performance-related overall anxiety (t = -2.132, P = .05) and administering intrathecal chemotherapy (t = -2.144, P = .053). Fifty percent of participants missed a medication error demonstrating confirmation bias. CONCLUSION: This simulation strategy resulted in improved confidence in measuring ICP, performance-related overall anxiety, and confidence in administering chemotherapy. Confirmation bias occurred during simulation testing for a medication error. We propose this method for maintaining clinical competencies in health care providers and introducing new skills to existing practices.