Patients With Voice Prosthesis Rehabilitation During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Analyzing the Effectiveness of Remote Triage and Management.

OBJECTIVE: To describe a remote approach used with patients with voice prosthesis after laryngectomy during the COVID-19 pandemic and the resulting clinical outcomes in terms of voice prosthesis complications management, oncological monitoring, and psychophysical well-being. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Otolaryngology Clinic of the University Polyclinic A. Gemelli, IRCCS Foundation. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: All patients with voice prosthesis who underwent laryngectomy followed by our institute were offered enrollment. Patients who agreed to participate were interviewed to inquire about the nature of the need and to plan a video call with the appropriate clinician. Before and 1 week after the clinician's call, patients were tested with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Degrees of satisfaction were investigated with a visual analog scale. A comparison between those who accepted and refused telematic support was carried out to identify factors that influence patient interest in teleservice. RESULTS: Video call service allowed us to reach 37 (50.68%) of 73 patients. In 23 (62.16%) of 37 cases, the video call was sufficient to manage the problem. In the remaining 14 cases (37.83%), an outpatient visit was necessary. Participants who refused telematic support had a significantly shorter time interval from the last ear, nose, and throat visit than patients who accepted (57.95 vs 96.14 days, P = .03). Video-called patients showed significantly decreased levels of anxiety and depression (mean Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale total score pre- vs post-video call: 13.97 vs. 10.23, P < .0001) and reported high levels of satisfaction about the service. CONCLUSION: Remote approach may be a viable support in the management of patients with voice prosthesis rehabilitation.

Multicenter randomized crossover trial evaluating the provox luna in laryngectomized subjects.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the relative compliance and the dermatological and pulmonary outcomes when the Provox Luna system (Atos Medical, Malmö, Sweden) is added during the night to the usual tracheastoma care of laryngectomized subjects. METHODS: This was a multicenter randomized crossover trial conducted in the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Erasmus Medical Center, and Maastricht University Medical Center in The Netherlands. The study included 46 laryngectomized subjects with prior heat and moisture exchanger (HME) and adhesive experience. RESULTS: A significant improvement in the number of compliant individuals was found: Luna: n = 43 of 45 (96%); usual care: n = 35 of 46 (76%), P = 0.02. The Luna period was associated with longer intervals of daily HME use (Luna 23.2 hours [range: 15.6-24.0 hours], usual care [UC]: 21.5 hours [range: 6.0-24.0 hours], P = 0.003) and an increased frequency of skin improvement overnight (Luna 3.9 days [standard deviation (SD)]: 7.0 days), Usual Care: 8.1 days ([SD: 10.8 days], P = 0.008). Fifty-six percent (n = 26) of participants wanted to continue using the Provox Luna system at the conclusion of the study. CONCLUSION: An improvement in compliance and skin recovery overnight was observed when the Provox Luna was added to the usual adhesive and HME use. Therefore, there is utility in supplementing the usual post-total laryngectomy care with the Provox Luna system at night, particularly in the setting of compliance concerns and in subjects who desire dermatological relief overnight. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1b Laryngoscope, 129:2354-2360, 2019.

Tracheoesophageal Prosthesis Use Is Associated With Improved Overall Quality of Life in Veterans With Laryngeal Cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Veterans have an increased risk of laryngeal cancer, yet their oncologic and functional outcomes remain understudied. We sought to determine the longitudinal impact of tracheoesophageal puncture and voice prosthesis on quality-of-life measures in veterans following total laryngectomy (TL). METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of TL patients (n = 68) treated at the Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center using the Voice Handicap Index (VHI), MD Anderson Dysphagia Index (MDADI), and University of Washington Quality of Life Index (UW-QOL). RESULTS: Using tracheoesophageal (TE) speech was associated with significantly better VHI, MDADI, and UW-QOL scores compared to other forms of communication. The association between TE speech use on VHI, MDADI, and UQ-QOL persisted even when the analysis was limited to patients with >5-year follow-up and was maintained on multivariate analysis that accounted for a history of radiation and laryngectomy for recurrent laryngeal cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Using tracheoesophageal speech after total laryngectomy is associated with durable improvements in quality of life and functional outcomes in veterans. Tracheoesophageal voice restoration should be attempted whenever technically feasible in patients that meet the complex psychosocial and physical requirements to appropriately utilize TE speech.

Social and quality of life impact using a voice prosthesis after laryngectomy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review is intended to give an up-to-date overview of key developments in the evidence base relating specifically to the social and quality of life (QOL) impact of using a voice prosthesis, with reflections on the impact on clinical practice. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent studies have shed light on the role of social support on psychological adjustment after laryngectomy, developing the existing evidence base on psychological sequelae. Investigations into the relationship between voice intensity/intelligibility and voice handicap/QOL may suggest a relationship for some patients, and current tools for measuring these constructs are evaluated. Recent qualitative research on the lived experience and social impact of using a voice prosthesis is presented. SUMMARY: Little research is currently available exploring the impact of using a voice prosthesis on social participation, which is reflected in the dearth of participation-focused interventions for laryngectomy patients. Further research on the lived experience of tracheoesophageal speech is required to understand this phenomenon and develop appropriate interventions for enhancing communication, participation and QOL with a voice prosthesis after laryngectomy.

How do voice restoration methods affect the psychological status of patients after total laryngectomy?

OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the relationship between psychological well-being and different voice rehabilitation methods in total laryngectomy patients. METHODS: The study enrolled 96 patients who underwent total laryngectomy. The patients were divided into three groups according to the voice rehabilitation method used: esophageal speech (24 patients); a tracheoesophageal fistula and Provox 2 voice prosthesis (57 patients); or an electrolarynx (15 patients). The participants were asked to complete the Turkish version of the Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10) to assess voice problems. They were also asked to complete the Turkish version of the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). The test scores of the three groups were compared statistically. RESULTS: Patients who used esophageal speech had a mean VHI-10 score of 10.25 ± 3.22 versus 19.42 ± 5.56 and 17.60 ± 1.92 for the tracheoesophageal fistula and Provox 2 and electrolarynx groups respectively, reflecting better perception of their voice. They also had a PSS score of 11.38 ± 3.92, indicating that they felt less stressed in comparison with the tracheoesophageal fistula and Provox 2 and electrolarynx groups, which scored 18.84 ± 5.50 and 16.20 ± 3.49 respectively. The HADS scores of the groups were not different, indicating that the patients' anxiety and depression status did not vary. CONCLUSION: Patients who used esophageal speech perceived less stress and were less handicapped by their voice.

[Laryngectomy, why me?]. / Laryngectomisée, pourquoi moi?

Christiane, aged 49, is married with children. In this article she writes about her care pathway from her larynx cancer diagnosis through to her rehabilitation and return to an almost normal life.

[Vocational rehabilitation after total laryngectomy]. / Berufliche Rehabilitation nach Laryngektomie.

BACKGROUND: Aim of this study was to find out how many patients after a total laryngectomy (TLE) return to work successfully and what factors support vocational rehabilitation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Laryngectomees (n=231) aged up to 60 years completed questionnaires and structured interviews before TLE (t1), before rehabilitation (t2), at the end of rehabilitation (t3), 1 year after TLE (t4), 2 years after TLE (t5), and 3 years after TLE (t6). RESULTS: Prior to TLE, 38% of all respondents were employed, 34% were unemployed, 23% received disability-related and 3% age-related pension retirement. One year after TLE, 13% were employed, 15% 2 years and 14% 3 years after TLE. Unemployed were 10% (t4), 5% (t5), and 7% (t6) of the patients. For 59% of all respondents it was very important to have a job. Predictors of successful vocational rehabilitation were employment prior to TLE, age <50 years, being self-employed or clerical employee, good physical functioning, good speech intelligibility, high motivation to go back to work, and support from colleagues. CONCLUSION: Only few laryngectomees return to work. However, even before TLE only a third of the patients was employed, another third was unemployed. Most of the patients receive pension retirement after TLE. As return to work is important for many patients, patient consultations should consider possibilities to support vocational rehabilitation before offering to apply for retirement.

Relación entre el aprendizaje de la voz erigmofónica y los niveles de ansiedad y de depresión en pacientes laringectomizados totales / No disponible

La pérdida de la voz laríngea es la principal consecuencia que sufren los laringectomizados totales, por lo que el aprendizaje de una nueva voz es el objetivo principal de la rehabilitación de estos pacientes. La voz erigmofónica es una de las posibilidades que tiene estos pacientes para recuperar la capacidad de comunicación oral de una manera natural. La laringectomía total se asocia a consecuencias psicológicas, como la ansiedad y la depresión, frecuentemente presentes en la enfermedad oncológica.En la investigación que presentamos, se hace referencia a la posible incidencia de algunas de las características de la voz erigmofónica sobre los niveles de ansiedad y de depresión de estos pacientes. Los cambios observados en estas respuestas en función de la percepción que tienen sobre su nueva voz, de los cambios experimentados en su aprendizaje, de la importancia que ha supuesto para ellos y si tienen impresión de habla correcta con las personas con las que se comunican. Se ha valorado la incidencia que ha supuesto el tiempo que les ha costado alcanzar un nivel mínimo de dominio de la voz erigmofónica necesaria para mantener comunicación oral. Los resultados obtenidos confirman la significación o valor predictivo de tres de las variables estudiadas: Las personas que perciben que han aprendido a hablar, que hablan bien y que hablan con cualquiera (no solo con familiares) están menos deprimidos. En el caso de la ansiedad no se encuentran efectos. Hemos elaborado un perfil del paciente que no disminuye su nivel de depresión después de haber adquirido la voz erigmofónica: considera que ha aprendido a hablar con dificultad, ya que le ha costado más de 6 meses; pero no se siente nada satisfecho con su nueva voz, tiene la impresión de no hablar correctamente, habla solamente con familiares y la pérdida de la voz le supuso un sentimiento de incapacidad. La laringectomía le afectó mucho psicológicamente, familiarmente, socialmente y laboralmente (está en paro). Se siente muy afectado físicamente, con molestias por el traqueostoma, dificultades en la respiración y dificultades para tragar alimentos. Es relativamente joven (54 años) y está viudo (AU)

The loss of laryngeal voice is the main consequence suffered by total laryngectomy, so learning a new voice is the main objective of the rehabilitation of these patients. Esophageal voice is one of the possibilities for patients to recover oral communication skills in a natural way. Total laryngectomy is associated with psychological consequences such as anxiety and depression often present in cancer disease. The present research is about the potential impact of some of the characteristics of the esophageal voice on levels of anxiety and depression in these patients. The observed changes in these responses in terms of perceptions about his new voice, the changes in their learning, the importance that has meant for them and if they have impression of correct speech and with whom they communicate. We evaluated the impact of time it took them to reach a minimum level of mastery of esophageal voice necessary to maintain oral communication. The results obtained confirm the significance or predictive value of three of the variables studied: People who perceive they have learned to speak, they speak well and speak with anyone (not just family) are less depressed. In the case of anxiety are no effects. We have developed a patient profile that does not diminish their level of depression after having acquired the voice erigmofónica: Consider who has learned to speak with difficulty, and that has cost more than 6 months, but does not feel at all satisfied with their new voice, has the impression of not speaking properly, speak only with family and lost his voice was a sense of incapacity. Laryngectomy psychologically affected him deeply, familiarly, socially and occupationally (is unemployed). He feels physically affected with discomfort for the tracheostoma, difficulty in breathing and swallowing difficulties. The patient is relatively young (54 years) and is a widower (AU)

[The role of sex in voice restoration and emotional functioning after laryngectomy]. / Die Rolle des Geschlechts bei stimmlicher Rehabilitation und emotionalem Befinden nach Laryngektomie.

BACKGROUND: Data on psychosocial factors of laryngectomized women is rare. All means of alaryngeal voice production sound male due to low fundamental frequency and roughness, which makes postlaryngectomy voice rehabilitation especially challenging to women. Aim of this study was to investigate whether women use alaryngeal speech more seldomly and therefore are more emotionally distressed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a cross-sectional multi-centred study 12 female and 138 male laryngectomees were interviewed. To identify risc factors on seldom use of alaryngeal speech and emotional functioning, logistic regression was used and odds ratios were adjusted to age, time since laryngectomy, physical functioning, social activity and feelings of stigmatization. RESULTS: Esophageal speech was used by 83% of the female and 57% of the male patients, prosthetic speech was used by 17% of the female and 20% of the male patients and electrolaryngeal speech was used by 17% of the female and 29% of the male patients. There was a higher risk for laryngectomees to be more emotionally distressed when feeling physically bad (OR=2,48; p=0,02) or having feelings of stigmatization (OR=3,94; p≤0,00). Besides more women tended to be socially active than men (83% vs. 54%; p=0,05). CONCLUSIONS: There was no influence of sex neither on use of alaryngeal speech nor on emotional functioning. Since there is evidence for a different psychosocial adjustment in laryngectomized men and women, more investigation including bigger sample sizes will be needed on this special issue.

Determining the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of the ActiValve: results of a long-term prospective trial.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To investigate 1) whether the Provox ActiValve results in increased device-life in individuals with below average device-life, 2) whether it is cost-effective, and 3) whether it has any impact on voice-related quality of life. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study. METHODS: Individuals who experienced below-average tracheoesophageal prosthesis (TEP) life were studied. RESULTS: Individuals with persistent below-average TEP life were enrolled in the study and underwent periodic re-evaluation. The majority (73%) experienced significant improvement as a result of use of the device. Those who continued to wear the device were followed for an average of 30.45 months (range, 14.70-43.49 months) and wore a total of 31 devices over this time. They demonstrated an average increase in device-life of more than 500%, going from an average of 1.93 months with a traditional indwelling device to 10.30 months with the ActiValve. The majority of individuals found that voicing with the ActiValve was either the same or better than with their previous indwelling TEP. Voice-related quality of life was not significantly different from that of a group of controls. Overall satisfaction with the device was high, and the majority would have chosen the ActiValve in the future. Overall, there were estimated to be cost savings to third-party payers through use of the ActiValve in this population. CONCLUSIONS: The ActiValve is effective in increasing device-life in selected patients who have failed conservative measures. Our protocol for use of the device requires individuals to meet several usage criteria before initial placement and to return for periodic monitoring.

Satisfaction and quality of life in laryngectomees after voice prosthesis rehabilitation.

OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of the study was to assess the satisfaction and quality of life in laryngectomees after vocal rehabilitation using voice prostheses. We evaluated the impact on quality of life between laryngectomees with voice prostheses, laryngectomees without them and healthy controls. METHODS: This was a prospective study on a sample of laryngectomees in an Italian university hospital. Our study population was composed of 42 patients who had previously undergone a total laryngectomy; in 24 of them, voice rehabilitation was obtained with a voice prosthesis device (group A), while 18 of them learned oesophageal voice (group B). The results were compared with a group of 25 healthy controls (group C). In order to investigate the quality of life, we administered the Short Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36) to the 3 groups. Moreover, self-satisfaction of the subjects in group A was assessed by single questions regarding their use of the voice prosthesis. RESULTS: A statistical difference in the SF-36 was detected for social functioning (SF) between groups A and B. Role physical, SF and role emotional were significantly better in group C than in group A. Group A stated they were very satisfied with voice quality while there were still some problems regarding prosthesis lifetime and communication at the telephone or in noisy environments. CONCLUSIONS: Voice prosthesis implantation in laryngectomees showed positive effects on patients' quality of life; however, there are still some negative aspects. At present, an early diagnosis of larynx cancer with a partial laryngectomy in order to preserve phonatory function is the gold standard.

Voice-related quality of life (V-RQOL) outcomes in laryngectomees.

BACKGROUND: Laryngeal cancer has a significant impact on patients. This study compared the Voice-Related Quality of Life (V-RQOL) outcomes specific to 3 different postlaryngectomy voice rehabilitation methods. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 75 patients with laryngectomy from our V-RQOL questionnaire database. RESULTS: The database included 18 electrolaryngeal speech (ELS), 15 esophageal speech (ES), and 42 tracheoesophageal speech (TES) patients. Pairwise comparisons of V-RQOL outcomes showed that TES was perceived to be better than ELS (p < .001). ES was perceived as better than ELS, but this was driven by a difference in the total and social-emotional V-RQOL scores (p < .05). There was no difference between TES and ES groups. Only ELS showed a positive correlation with time after surgery and older age. CONCLUSIONS: Patients using TES had similar V-RQOL outcomes compared to ES and both performed significantly better than ELS. For ELS, the total V-RQOL score was better with longer time after surgery and older age.

The voice handicap index with post-laryngectomy male voices.

BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment for advanced laryngeal cancer involves complete removal of the larynx ('laryngectomy') and initial total loss of voice. Post-laryngectomy rehabilitation involves implementation of different means of 'voicing' for these patients wherever possible. There is little information about laryngectomees' perception of their changed voice quality and communication status. Surgical voice restoration (SVR) has become the 'gold standard' rehabilitation, but there continue to be patients who use other methods of communication. There is no clear evidence comparing patients' perception of their voice handicap across different types of alaryngeal communication. AIMS: To compare the self-assessed vocal handicap of laryngectomees using SVR with those using non-SVR methods of post-laryngectomy communication. METHODS & PROCEDURES: Potential participants were identified from one Head and Neck cancer centre in South Wales. They included both male and female participants using all methods of post-laryngectomy communication. Each patient's Voice Handicap Index (VHI) score, sub-set scores, and group means were calculated. Two major confounding factors: age and time since surgery, and communication method (SVR/non-SVR), were considered to identify factors, other than method of communication, which may influence rehabilitation outcomes. OUTCOMES & RESULTS: A total of 71 questionnaires were sent out and 62 (82%) were returned from 35 patients who had undergone SVR and 27 patients who used non-SVR methods of communication. Of the non-SVR group, twelve used oesophageal voice, eleven an electrolarynx, two writing and two mouthing for communication. The gender ratio (53:9), age (43-90 years) and time since surgery (1-40 years) were broadly representative of this population, but because of the small number of females, we excluded the women from further analysis. Individual VHI scores ranged from 4 to 106. Both the SVR and non-SVR group mean scores: 44.7 and 50.9, were within the range of moderately severe voice handicap. There was no significant difference between the groups for total VHI scores or two of the three sub-domains, nor any significant effect on voice handicap due to the confounding factors assessed: age or time since surgery. The total VHI score was better by 6.5 ( - 4.9 to 17.9) points in the SVR group (p = 0.3), probably reflecting the literature reporting superior voice in SVR. CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS: The data suggest that where patient-assessed quality of life is concerned, SVR and non-SVR outcomes are comparable. This is an important consideration when planning and carrying out treatment recommendations. The study has clear clinical implications; understanding the potential of all methods of post-laryngectomy communication is essential for holistic patient management.

Voice handicap and health-related quality of life in laryngectomees: assessments with the use of VHI and EORTC questionnaires.

AIMS: To investigate the Voice Handicap Index (VHI), the health-related quality of life (HRQL), and the correlations between VHI and HRQL in laryngectomees. METHODS: Forty-three laryngectomized persons participated (mean age 68;6 years, time since laryngectomy between 0;6 and 12 years). Evaluation of voice handicap was done with the VHI. HRQL was evaluated with questionnaires from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-H&N35. RESULTS: VHI for the whole group demonstrated a moderate voice handicap, with a mean score of 48/120. The functional scales of EORTC QLQ-C30 resulted in scores on the same level as the normal population with the exception of a lower global quality of life scale (Global QOL). EORTC QLQ-H&N35 revealed problems with smell and taste, speech, coughing, xerostomia, and sexuality. VHI correlated significantly with the Global QOL, the functional scales, dyspnea, pain, nausea and financial difficulties (EORTC QLQ-C30). Significant correlations were also found between VHI and speech problems, social contact, pain from the head and neck area, sense problems, sexuality and social eating (EORTC QLQ-H&N35). CONCLUSION: The EORTC questionnaires in combination with the VHI questionnaire seem to capture most of the problems following laryngectomy, including voice problems.

Voice quality after supracricoid laryngectomy and total laryngectomy with insertion of voice prosthesis.

Vocal quality was analyzed in 20 subjects who underwent total laryngectomy with insertion of voice prosthesis (TL with VP) and in 10 subjects who underwent supracricoid laryngectomy (SCL). Acoustic analysis was carried out using Lingwaves and Praat, for sustained vowels and conversation to obtain the fundamental frequency (F(0)) and jitter parameters. Perceptual evaluations and self-assessment of voice impact on the quality of life were also performed. Results showed statistically significant differences between TL+VP and SCL individuals for the mean F(0) during conversation, for Roughness, Grade of voice quality, and self-assessment of speech, with worst results in the SCL group.

Electroglottographic and perceptual evaluation of tracheoesophageal speech.

To optimize tracheoesophageal (TO) speech after total laryngectomy, it is vital to have a robust tool of assessment to help investigate deficiencies, document changes, and facilitate therapy. We sought to evaluate and validate electroglottography (EGG) as an important tool in the multidimensional assessment of TO speech. This study is a cross-sectional study of the largest cohort of TO speakers treated by a single surgeon. A second group of normal laryngeal speakers served as a control group. EGG analysis of both groups using connected speech and sustained vowels was performed. Two trained expert raters undertook perceptual evaluation using two accepted scales. EGG measures were then analyzed for correlation with treatment variables. A separate correlation analysis was performed to identify EGG measures that may be associated with perceptual dimensions. Our data from EGG analysis are similar to data obtained from conventional acoustic signal analysis of TO speakers. Sustained vowel and connected speech parameters were poorer in TO speakers than in normal laryngeal speakers. In perceptual evaluation, only grade (G) of the GRBAS scale and Overall Voice Quality appeared reproducible and reliable. T stage, pharyngeal reconstruction and method of closure, cricopharyngeal myotomy, and postoperative complications appear to be correlated with the EGG measures. Five voice measures-jitter, shimmer, average frequency, normalized noise energy, and irregularity-correlated well with the key dimensions of perceptual assessment. EGG is an important assessment tool of TO speech, and can now be reliably used in a clinical setting.

[Quality of life in long-term survivors after laryngectomy]. / Lebensqualität bei Langzeitüberlebenden nach Laryngektomie.

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to assess the postoperative quality of life (QoL) of 30 patients successfully treated with a laryngectomy. METHODS: QoL was evaluated with two validated questionnaires (EORTC-QLQ-C30 and EORTC-QLQ-H&N35) during the regular outpatient follow-up. To analyse the long-term quality of life, we divided our collective into two groups of patients; one consisting of patients whose treatment had been completed less than five years ago and one whose therapy had been finished more than five years ago. RESULTS: The collective consisted of 24 men (80 %) and 6 (20 %) women with a mean age of 58.8 +/- 8.7 years. Mean follow-up was 53 months (range: 12 - 110). Most patients (n = 15, 50 %) had a tumor stadium IV after UICC. Voice rehabilitation was achieved in all patients with a Provoxreg voice prosthesis. The global QoL was rated as satisfying with a mean value of 62. The analysis of the specific questionnaire showed mostly a limitation of smell. Patients, whose treatment was longer than five years ago, showed a slight improvement in the global QoL. Overall we could not find a significant difference concerning the QoL between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In our study the QoL of laryngectomized patients was satisfying. The most common symptoms were problems with smell, cough and dyspnoea.

[Relevance of psychosocial factors in speech rehabilitation after laryngectomy]. / Bedeutung psychosozialer Faktoren bei der Stimmrehabilitation nach Laryngektomie.

BACKGROUND: Often it is assumed that psychosocial and sociodemographic factors cause the success of voice rehabilitation after laryngectomy. Aim of this study was to analyze the association between these parameters. METHODS: Based on tumor registries of six ENT-clinics all patients were surveyed, who were laryngectomized in the years before (N = 190). Success of voice rehabilitation has been assessed as speech intelligibility measured with the postlaryngectomy-telephone-intelligibility-test. For the assessment of the psychosocial parameters validated and standardized instruments were used if possible. Statistical analysis was done by multiple logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Low speech intelligibility is associated with reduced conversations (OR 0.970) and social activity (OR 1.049). Patients are more likely to talk with esophageal voice when their motivation for learning the new voice was high (OR 7.835) and when they assessed their speech therapist as important for their motivation (OR 4.794). The risk to communicate merely by whispering is higher when patients live together with a partner (OR 5.293), when they talk seldomly (OR 1.017) and when they are not very active in social contexts (OR 0.966). CONCLUSIONS: Psychosocial factors can only partly explain how voice rehabilitation after laryngectomy becomes a success. Speech intelligibility is associated with active communication behaviour, whereas the use of an esophageal voice is correlated with motivation. It seems that the gaining of tracheoesophageal puncture voice is independent of psychosocial factors.