Are lower limb symmetry and self-reported symptoms associated with functional and neuromuscular outcomes in Brazilian adults with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A cross-sectional study.

INTRODUCTION: After anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, determining readiness to return to participation is challenging. The understanding of which neuromuscular performance parameters are associated with limb symmetry and self-reported symptoms may be useful to improve monitoring the rehabilitation towards adequate decision-making to return. OBJECTIVES: To compare the ACL-operated and injury-free lower limbs regarding functional performance; and to investigate whether lower limb strength and functional performance are associated with self-reported symptoms and functional lower limb symmetry. METHOD: Thirty-four participants were included. Functional performance was assessed by using the Y-Balance test, Single-leg Hop, and Functional Movement Screen. An isokinetic dynamometer was used to evaluate the strength levels in open and closed kinetic chains. The functional lower limb symmetry was calculated considering the single-leg hop test results for each lower limb. RESULTS: There were no differences in dynamic balance (Y-Balance) between the operated and injury-free limbs. The operated limb presented a worst performance in the single-leg hop. Self-reported symptoms prevalence and lower limb symmetry were associated with knee extension strength and functional performance (Y-Balance). CONCLUSION: Individuals submitted to ACL-reconstruction presented worse functional performance in the operated limb compared to the injury-free limb. Both knee strength and dynamic balance were associated with limb symmetry and self-reported symptoms.

Addition of anterolateral ligament reconstruction to primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction could benefit recovery of functional outcomes.

This study aimed to compare functional outcomes sequentially up to 1 year after combined anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR) and isolated ACLR. Fifty patients who underwent ACLR with versus without ALLR were analyzed at four different time points (preoperatively and 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively). For the functional outcomes, muscle strength and acceleration time (AT) were measured using an isokinetic dynamometer. Proprioception was evaluated using joint position sense and dynamic postural stability. Patient-reported outcomes were measured using the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-11) scores. Functional performance was assessed using single-leg hop distance (SLHD) and Limb Symmetry Index. In the operated knees, quadriceps (at 6 months postoperatively, p = 0.003) and hamstring (at 6 and 12 months postoperatively, p < 0.001) strength were significantly higher in the combined ACLR and ALLR group than the isolated ACLR group. The TSK-11 (at 6 and 12 months postoperatively, p < 0.001) was significantly lower in the combined ACLR and ALLR group than the isolated ACLR group. SLHD was significantly higher in the combined ACLR and ALLR group than the isolated ACLR group (at 6 months, p = 0.022 and at 12 months, p = 0.024). The addition of ALLR to primary ACLR yielded better muscle performance, fear of movement, and functional performance than isolated ACLR.

Prediction of specific structural damage to the knee joint using qualitative isokinetic analysis.

BACKGROUND: An isokinetic moment curve (IMC) pattern-damaged structure prediction model may be of considerable value in assisting the diagnosis of knee injuries in clinical scenarios. This study aimed to explore the association between irregular IMC patterns and specific structural damages in the knee, including anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture, meniscus (MS) injury, and patellofemoral joint (PFJ) lesions, and to develop an IMC pattern-damaged structure prediction model. METHODS: A total of 94 subjects were enrolled in this study and underwent isokinetic testing of the knee joint (5 consecutive flexion-extension movements within the range of motion of 90°-10°, 60°/s). Qualitative analysis of the IMCs for all subjects was completed by two blinded examiners. A multinomial logistic regression analysis was used to investigate whether a specific abnormal curve pattern was associated with specific knee structural injuries and to test the predictive effectiveness of IMC patterns for specific structural damage in the knee. RESULTS: The results of the multinomial logistic regression revealed a significant association between the irregular IMC patterns of the knee extensors and specific structural damages ("Valley" - ACL, PFJ, and ACL + MS, "Drop" - ACL, and ACL + MS, "Shaking" - ACL, MS, PFJ, and ACL + MS). The accuracy and Macro-averaged F1 score of the predicting model were 56.1% and 0.426, respectively. CONCLUSION: The associations between irregular IMC patterns and specific knee structural injuries were identified. However, the accuracy and Macro-averaged F1 score of the established predictive model indicated its relatively low predictive efficacy. For the development of a more accurate predictive model, it may be essential to incorporate angle-specific and/or speed-specific analyses of qualitative and quantitative data in isokinetic testing. Furthermore, the utilization of artificial intelligence image recognition technology may prove beneficial for analyzing large datasets in the future.

Effects of various load magnitudes on ACL: an in vitro study using adolescent porcine stifle joints.

INTRODUCTION: The escalating incidence of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries, particularly among adolescents, is a pressing concern. The study of ACL biomechanics in this demographic presents challenges due to the scarcity of cadaveric specimens. This research endeavors to validate the adolescent porcine stifle joint as a fitting model for ACL studies. METHODS: We conducted experiments on 30 fresh porcine stifle knee joints. (Breed: Yorkshire, Weight: avg 90 lbs, Age Range: 2-4 months). They were stored at - 22 °C and a subsequent 24-h thaw at room temperature before being prepared for the experiment. These joints were randomly assigned to three groups. The first group served as a control and underwent only the load-to-failure test. The remaining two groups were subjected to 100 cycles, with forces of 300N and 520N, respectively. The load values of 300N and 520N correspond to three and five times the body weight (BW) of our juvenile porcine, respectively. RESULT: The 520N force demonstrated a higher strain than the 300N, indicating a direct correlation between ACL strain and augmented loads. A significant difference in load-to-failure (p = 0.014) was observed between non-cyclically loaded ACLs and those subjected to 100 cycles at 520N. Three of the ten samples in the 520N group failed before completing 100 cycles. The ruptured ACLs from these tests closely resembled adolescent ACL injuries in detachment patterns. ACL stiffness was also measured post-cyclical loading by applying force and pulling the ACL at a rate of 1 mm per sec. Moreover, ACL stiffness measurements decreased from 152.46 N/mm in the control group to 129.42 N/mm after 100 cycles at 300N and a more significant drop to 86.90 N/mm after 100 cycles at 520N. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and t-test were chosen for statistical analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The porcine stifle joint is an appropriate model for understanding ACL biomechanics in the skeletally immature demographic. The results emphasize the ligament's susceptibility to injury under high-impact loads pertinent to sports activities. The study advocates for further research into different loading scenarios and the protective role of muscle co-activation in ACL injury prevention.

The Relationship of Open- and Closed-Kinetic-Chain Rate of Force Development With Jump Performance Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

PURPOSE: To determine between-limbs differences in isometric rate of force development (RFD) measured during open- (OKC) and closed-kinetic-chain (CKC) strength testing and establish which method had the strongest relationship to single-leg vertical-jump performance and knee mechanics after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. METHODS: Subjects (n = 19) 1 to 5 years from ACL reconstruction performed isometric knee extensions (OKC), unilateral isometric midthigh pulls (CKC), and single-leg vertical jumps on the ACL-involved and -noninvolved limbs. Between-limbs differences were assessed using paired t tests, and the relationship between RFD, jump performance, and knee mechanics was assessed using correlation coefficients (r; P ≤ .05). RESULTS: There were significant between-limbs differences in OKC RFD (P = .008, d = -0.69) but not CKC RFD. OKC RFD in the ACL-involved limb had a strong association with jump height (r = .64, P = .003), knee-joint power (r = .72, P < .001), and peak knee-flexion angle (r = .72, P = .001). CKC RFD in the ACL-involved limb had a strong association with jump height (r = .65, P = .004) and knee-joint power (r = .67, P = .002) but not peak knee-flexion angle (r = .40, P = .09). CONCLUSIONS: While both OKC and CKC RFD were strongly related to jump performance and knee-joint power, OKC RFD was able to detect between-limbs RFD asymmetries and was strongly related to knee-joint kinematics. These findings indicate that isometric knee extension may be optimal for assessing RFD after ACL reconstruction.

No Association Between Injury-Related Fear and Isokinetic Quadriceps Strength in Individuals With a History of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

CONTEXT: Injury-related fear and quadriceps strength are independently associated with secondary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury risk. It is not known whether injury-related fear and quadriceps strength are associated, despite their individual predictive capabilities of secondary ACL injury. The purpose of this study was to examine the association between injury-related fear and quadriceps strength in individuals at least 1 year after ACL reconstruction (ACLR). DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: Forty participants between the ages of 18 and 35 years at least 1 year post unilateral primary ACLR. Participants completed the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia-11 (TSK-11) and a standard isokinetic quadriceps strength assessment using the Biodex Isokinetic Dynamometer. Pearson Product-Moment correlations were used to examine the linear association between the TSK-11 scores and peak torque (in nanometers per kilogram) for each limb and between the TSK-11 scores and limb symmetry indices for each limb. Pearson Product-Moment correlation coefficients (r) were interpreted as very high (.90-1.00), high (.70-.90), moderate (.50-.70), low (.30-.50), and no correlation (.00-.30). RESULTS: The average TSK-11 score was 18.2 (5.3), average ACLR peak quadriceps torque was 1.9 (0.50) N·m/kg, average contralateral peak quadriceps torque was 2.3 (0.48) N·m/kg, and average limb symmetry index was 85.3% (12.6%). There was no statistically significant correlation between the TSK-11 and peak quadriceps torque on the ACLR limb (r = .12, P = .46), the TSK-11 and contralateral limb (r = .29, P = .07), or the TSK-11 and limb symmetry index (r = -.18, P = .27). CONCLUSIONS: There was no association between kinesiophobia and peak isokinetic quadriceps strength in individuals at least 1 year post-ACLR. Both factors, independently, have been shown to influence risk of secondary injury in patients after ACLR.

Computational study of extrinsic factors affecting ACL strain during single-leg jump landing.

BACKGROUND: Non-contact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are a major concern in sport-related activities due to dynamic knee movements. There is a paucity of finite element (FE) studies that have accurately replicated the knee geometry, kinematics, and muscle forces during dynamic activities. The objective of this study was to develop and validate a knee FE model and use it to quantify the relationships between sagittal plane knee kinematics, kinetics and the resulting ACL strain. METHODS: 3D images of a cadaver knee specimen were segmented (bones, cartilage, and meniscus) and meshed to develop the FE model. Knee ligament insertion sites were defined in the FE model via experimental digitization of the specimen's ligaments. The response of the model was validated against multiple physiological knee movements using published experimental data. Single-leg jump landing motions were then simulated on the validated model with muscle forces and kinematic inputs derived from motion capture and rigid body modelling of ten participants. RESULTS: The maximum ACL strain measured with the model during jump landing was 3.5 ± 2.2%, comparable to published experimental results. Bivariate analysis showed no significant correlation between body weight, ground reaction force and sagittal plane parameters (such as joint flexion angles, joint moments, muscle forces, and joint velocity) and ACL strain. Multivariate regression analysis showed increasing trunk, hip and ankle flexion angles decreases ACL strain (R2 = 90.04%, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Soft landing decreases ACL strain and the relationship could be presented through an empirical equation. The model and the empirical relation developed in this study could be used to better predict ACL injury risk and prevention strategies during dynamic activities.

Kinesiotaping Is Not Better Than a Placebo: Kinesiotaping for Postural Control in Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Reconstructed Patients-A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of this study was to investigate the immediate and delayed effects of kinesiotape (KT) on postural control and patient-reported outcome measures under challenging conditions in individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. METHODS: Thirty-two anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed patients for whom 6 months had passed since their operation were randomly assigned to either the KT (n = 16, aged 21.8 [5.5] y) or the placebo KT (n = 16, aged 24.0 [5.1] y) groups. Initially, both groups stood barefoot on a force platform while performing postural tasks in 4 randomized conditions (eyes open, eyes closed, cognitive task, and foam). Before the experiment, patients would bring the 4 conditions, which were written on folded papers, one by one, and in this way, the order of conditions for the examiners was determined. The patients' evaluations were conducted immediately and 48 hours after KT application. Postural control measures, with area and displacement of the center of pressure (CoP) in anterior-posterior and medial-lateral directions, and mean total velocity displacement of CoP (MVELO CoP) served as dependent variables. In addition, the International Knee Documentation Committee score was measured pretreatment and 48 hours posttreatment. RESULTS: Significant group-by-time interactions were observed for displacement of COP in medial-lateral direction (P = .002) and MVELO CoP (P = .034). MVELO CoP significantly decreased (mean difference = 0.60, P = .009) immediately after KT application compared with preapplication measures. In the placebo group, a statistically significant decrease in MVELO CoP (mean difference = 0.869, P = .001) was observed at 48 hours post-KT compared with preapplication values. International Knee Documentation Committee scores significantly improved at 48 hours post-KT application in both groups (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Though observed at different time points, both KT (immediately after the intervention) and placebo KT (48 h after the intervention) were found to improve postural control measures. It appears that the changes in postural control may be more related to proprioceptive enhancement due to KT rather than the specific KT pattern.

Poincaré analysis detects pathological limb loading rate variability in post-anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction individuals.

BACKGROUND: Post-ACLR individuals can experience repeated exposure to variable limb loading, which contributes to development of knee osteoarthritis. Variable limb loading can present as loading rate variability (LRV) and is magnified during tasks like fast walking when the system is stressed. Nonlinear measures that evaluate temporal variability have successfully detected changes in gait variability associated with altered motor control, however, appropriately describing and uncovering the nature of gait variability has been challenging. Here, Poincaré analysis, a nonlinear method unique in its ability to capture different aspects of variability, served to uncover and quantify changes in limb LRV. It was hypothesized that post-ACLR individuals' overloaded limbs would quantitatively and graphically demonstrate greater short-term stride-to-stride and long-term limb LRV during fast walking compared to the underloaded and healthy control limbs. METHODS: Fourteen post-ACLR individuals and fourteen healthy controls completed a walking protocol on an instrumented treadmill where they walked at 1.0 m/s and 1.5 m/s for 5-minutes each. A Welch's test was performed to compare differences in short-term and long-term LRV metrics for the post-ACLR individuals' overloaded and underloaded limbs and the healthy controls' right limbs. RESULTS: Analyses revealed that the post-ACLR individuals' overloaded limb exhibited significantly greater short-term and long-term values compared to the underloaded and healthy control limbs at 1.5 m/s (p<0.05). Additionally, the loading rate data was widely scattered across the plots for the overloaded limb, indicating greater LRV. SIGNIFICANCE: Poincaré analysis successfully identified that post-ACLR overloaded limbs exhibited impaired motor control during fast walking based on quantitative and graphical changes in variability. This highlights the clinical applications of Poincaré analysis, with the plots potentially serving as an easy-to-interpret diagnostic tool for pathological limb LRV.

Whole-body kinematics of squats two decades following anterior cruciate ligament injury.

BACKGROUND: Kinematic studies suggest that injury of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) leads to long-lasting movement deficits or compensations to unload the injured knee. This study evaluated lower body kinematics during squats in individuals who suffered unilateral ACL-injury more than 20 years ago. METHOD: Using motion capture, we compared maximum squat depth, time to complete the squat task, detailed kinematics, estimated kinetic-chain joint moments 0- 80° knee flexion, and weight distribution between legs across three groups with (ACLR, n = 27) and without ACL-reconstructive surgery (ACLPT, physiotherapy only, n = 28), and age-matched non-injured asymptomatic Controls (n = 31, average age across groups 47 years). RESULTS: ACLPT demonstrated significantly reduced squat depth compared to Controls (p = 0.004), whereas ACLR performed similarly to Controls (p = 1.000). Other outcome variables were comparable between groups. All participants nevertheless demonstrated asymmetric weight distribution between legs but without systematic unloading of the injured side in the ACLgroups. CONCLUSION: Expected compensatory strategies were not found in the ACL-groups, while poorer squat performance in the ACL-deficient group may depend on pure knee-joint mechanics, or lifestyle factors attributed to a less stable knee decades after ACL-injury.

No sign of weakness: a systematic review and meta-analysis of hip and calf muscle strength after anterior cruciate ligament injury.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine hip and lower-leg muscle strength in people after ACL injury compared with an uninjured control group (between people) and the uninjured contralateral limb (between limbs). DESIGN: Systematic review with meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, Cochrane CENTRAL and SportDiscus to 28 February 2023. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Primary ACL injury with mean age 18-40 years at time of injury. Studies had to measure hip and/or lower-leg muscle strength quantitatively (eg, dynamometer) and report muscle strength for the ACL-injured limb compared with: (i) an uninjured control group and/or (ii) the uninjured contralateral limb. Risk of bias was assessed according to Cochrane Collaboration domains. RESULTS: Twenty-eight studies were included (n=23 measured strength ≤12 months post-ACL reconstruction). Most examined hip abduction (16 studies), hip extension (12 studies) and hip external rotation (7 studies) strength. We found no meaningful difference in muscle strength between people or between limbs for hip abduction, extension, internal rotation, flexion or ankle plantarflexion, dorsiflexion (estimates ranged from -9% to +9% of comparator). The only non-zero differences identified were in hip adduction (24% stronger on ACL limb (95% CI 8% to 42%)) and hip external rotation strength (12% deficit on ACL limb (95% CI 6% to 18%)) compared with uninjured controls at follow-ups >12 months, however both results stemmed from only two studies. Certainty of evidence was very low for all outcomes and comparisons, and drawn primarily from the first year post-ACL reconstruction. CONCLUSION: Our results do not show widespread or substantial muscle weakness of the hip and lower-leg muscles after ACL injury, contrasting deficits of 10%-20% commonly reported for knee extensors and flexors. As it is unclear if deficits in hip and lower-leg muscle strength resolve with appropriate rehabilitation or no postinjury or postoperative weakness occurs, individualised assessment should guide training of hip and lower-leg strength following ACL injury. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020216793.

Anterior-Posterior Center of Pressure Is Associated With Knee Extensor Moment During Landing After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

CONTEXT: A reduced knee extensor moment (KEM) in the involved limb and asymmetry in the KEM during landing tasks are observed after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). There is limited information about the association of kinetic and kinematic parameters with the KEM during landing after ACLR. This study investigated the association of the anterior-posterior center of pressure (AP-COP) position, vertical ground reaction force (VGRF), and lower limb joint angles with the KEM during landing in female athletes following ACLR. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: Twenty-two female athletes who underwent ACLR performed a drop vertical jump at 7.9 (1.7) months after surgery. We evaluated the KEM, AP-COP position, VGRF, and sagittal plane hip, knee, and ankle angles using a 3-dimensional motion analysis system with force plates. RESULTS: The peak KEM in the involved limb was significantly smaller than that in the uninvolved limb during landing (1.43 [0.33] N·m/kg/m vs 1.84 [0.41] Nm/kg/m, P = .001). The VGRF in the involved limb was significantly smaller than that in the uninvolved limb (11.9 [2.3] N/kg vs 14.6 [3.5] N/kg, P = .005). The limb symmetry index of the KEM was predicted by that of the VGRF (P < .001, R2 = .621, ß = 0.800). The KEM was predicted by the AP-COP position in the involved limb (P = .015, R2 = .227, ß = 0.513) and by the VGRF in the uninvolved limb (P = .018, R2 = .213, ß = 0.500). No significant correlation was noted between the KEM and the lower limb joint angles. CONCLUSIONS: The AP-COP position and VGRF were associated with the KEM during landing. Evaluating the VGRF and AP-COP position, not the lower limb joint angles, may contribute to understanding the KEM during double-leg landing after ACLR in the clinical setting.

Influence of hamstring stiffness on anterior tibial translation after anterior cruciate ligament rupture.

BACKGROUND: There is a correlation between the hamstring stiffness and the decrease of anterior tibial translation in athletic patients with healthy knees. This observation could question the clinical reliability of the Lachman-Trillat test to detect complete ACL ruptures in patients with an important hamstring stiffness. This study aims to determine if anterior tibial translation is correlated with hamstring stiffness in patients with complete ACL rupture. METHODS: This is a prospective study including patients with unilateral complete ACL rupture confirmed by MRI. The arthrometer GNRB® was used to measure anterior tibial translation on both knees at 134 N and compute the side-to-side difference. The hamstring stiffness was assessed with the eccentric peak torque using the isokinetic dynamometer CON-TREX. Linear regressions were done between these two parameters on two study groups: one included all patients (GR1), and the other included only isolated ACL injuries without associated lesions (GR2). RESULTS: Fifty-two patients were included (29 men, 23 women) with an average of 34.9 years old. The mean eccentric peak torque of the hamstrings for pathological knees was 94.9Nm for GR1 and 91.7Nm for GR2. The mean side-to-side difference was 2.42 mm for GR1 and 1.99 mm for GR2. No significant correlations were identified for GR1 (p = 0.66) and GR2 (p = 0.105). CONCLUSION: No significant linear correlation was found between side-to-side difference measured by GNRB® and hamstring stiffness for pathological knees with complete ACL rupture. These results lead to believe that the Lachman-Trillat clinical test is not influenced by hamstring stiffness. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prospective study, level of evidence IV.

A lateral extra-articular tenodesis without additional hardware: Surgical technique and biomechanical comparison with an anatomic anterolateral ligament reconstruction in the augmentation of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: The aims of this study were to describe a lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) using no additional hardware and compare the tibiofemoral kinematics of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction augmented with either the LET or a standard anatomic anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction using intra-tunnel fixation. METHODS: Ten cadaveric knees were mounted on a robotic testing system and underwent a kinematic assessment of anterior tibial translation and internal tibial rotation under a simulated pivot-shift in the following states: ACL-intact, ACL-sectioned, ACL-sectioned/anterolateral complex (ALC)-sectioned, ACL-reconstructed/ALC-sectioned, ACL-reconstructed/ALL-reconstructed, and ACL-reconstructed/LET. For the LET, an iliotibial autograft was passed under the fibular collateral ligament and secured to the femur with the pull sutures of the ACL reconstruction femoral cortical suspensory fixation device, positioned at the distal ridge of Kaplan's fibers. RESULTS: Anterior tibial translation was restored to normal by ACL reconstruction without meaningful benefit of augmentation with LET or ALL. ACL reconstruction restored internal tibial rotation close to normal between 0° and 30°, but increased internal tibial rotation persisted between 45° and 90°. Augmentation of ACL reconstruction with the LET reduced internal rotation close to normal between 45° and 90°, whereas increased internal rotation persisted after ALL reconstruction. CONCLUSION: ACL reconstruction and LET are complementary in controlling tibiofemoral kinematics of knees with a combined ACL and ALC injury: ACL reconstruction restored native tibiofemoral kinematics except for internal rotation at flexion greater than 30°. The increased internal rotation at flexion greater than 30° was restored to normal with an LET, but not with an ALL reconstruction.

Changes in gait patterns after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in children.

PURPOSE: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) in children is indicated to reduce recurrent knee instability and further damage to the joint. Postoperative modified gait pattern was reported in the adult population after ACLR. The aim of this study was to analyse gait abnormalities, and especially knee and ankle adaptations during gait in children after ACLR. METHODS: A prospective study was performed between 2018 and 2022 on 50 children, aged nine to 15 years with unilateral ACL deficiency. Changes in gait pattern were evaluated by gait analysis before surgery and at the latest follow-up of 24 months. Kinematic data of ACL-deficient limb were compared to contralateral limb and to those of a matched control group of healthy children. RESULTS: Compared to control group, knee flexion was decreased for both ACL-deficient and contralateral knee before surgery. Decreased knee flexion during gait cycle persisted at latest follow-up. Ankle kinematics showed decreased dorsal flexion for both ACL-deficient and contralateral limb before surgery. At latest follow-up, ankle kinematics were modified for ACL-reconstructed limbs only at initial contact and showed no significant difference for contralateral limb compared to the control group. CONCLUSION: In children with ACL injury, abnormal gait patterns persist two years after ligament reconstruction, in spite of extensive rehabilitation and no clinical complaints. These findings might guide neuromuscular training to improve clinical outcomes and reduce the rerupture rate.

Difference of Knee Strength Recovery Between Revision and Primary ACL Reconstruction.

Different grafting procedures are available to restore knee stability after revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. We compared knee strength recovery between ACL revision surgery and primary reconstruction. One hundred and ten patients with ACL revision surgery were matched with 110 patients with primary reconstruction based on the graft procedure. The isokinetic knee strength had been assessed for the first 9 months post-surgery. Knee laxity, function, and activity score were also evaluated. Limb symmetry index for knee extensor and flexor strength was not different at 4-, 6- and 9-months post-surgery between revision surgery and primary reconstruction. These results depended on ipsilateral or contralateral graft choice. Ipsilateral hamstring tendon (HT) and contralateral bone-patellar-tendon-bone (BPTB) graft procedures were similar for a revision of a BPTB graft failure. Contralateral HT procedure was better than ipsilateral BPTB procedure for a revision of a HT graft failure. The early recovery of isokinetic knee strength after ACL revision surgery regardless of the HT or BPTB procedures, was similar to the recovery after primary ACL reconstruction with the same graft technique. These results apparently depended on a temporary quadriceps arthrogenic muscle inhibition and on a persistent donor site morbidity, concerning the new and the previous grafts, respectively.

Self-reported knee function and activity level are reduced after primary or additional anterior cruciate ligament injury in female football players: a five-year follow-up study.

BACKGROUND: Playing football involves a high risk of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries and these may affect knee function and activity level. OBJECTIVES: To measure changes in self-reported knee function, activity level, and satisfaction with knee function and activity level in female football players with or without an ACL-reconstructed knee. METHODS: Female football players, age 19.9 (SD 2.6) years, with either a primary ACL-reconstruction 1.6 (SD 0.7) years after ACL-reconstruction (n = 186) or no ACL injury (n = 113) were followed prospectively for five years. Self-reported data collected at baseline and follow-up included knee function (International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form [IKDC-SKF]), activity level (Tegner Activity Scale), and satisfaction with knee function (Likert scale 1=happy; 7=unhappy) and activity level (1-10 scale). Information on any new ACL injury during the follow-up period was collected. RESULTS: Players with ACL-reconstruction at baseline who either did (n = 56) or did not (n = 130) sustain an additional ACL injury, and players with no injury at baseline who remained injury free (n = 101) had a lower Tegner score at follow-up. Players with additional ACL injury had lower IKDC-SKF score (mean difference: -11.4, 95% CI: -16.0, -6.7), and satisfaction with activity level (mean difference: -1.5, 95% CI: -2.3, -0.7) at follow-up. Players with no additional ACL injury had higher satisfaction with knee function (mean difference: 0.6, 95% CI: 0.3, 0.9) at follow-up. Players with no ACL injury had lower satisfaction with activity level (mean difference: -0.7, 95% CI: -1.1, -0.3) at follow-up. Players with additional ACL injury had larger decreases in all variables measured compared to the two other groups. CONCLUSION: Primary, and even more so additional, ACL injuries decreased self-reported knee function, activity level, and satisfaction with knee function and activity level in female football players.

Neural drive and motor unit characteristics after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: implications for quadriceps weakness.

Purpose: The purpose of this investigation was to compare the quality of neural drive and recruited quadriceps motor units' (MU) action potential amplitude (MUAPAMP) and discharge rate (mean firing rate (MFR)) relative to recruitment threshold (RT) between individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and controls. Methods: Fourteen individuals with ACLR and 13 matched controls performed trapezoidal knee extensor contractions at 30%, 50%, 70%, and 100% of their maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC). Decomposition electromyography (dEMG) and torque were recorded concurrently. The Hoffmann reflex (H-reflex) and central activation ratio (CAR) were acquired bilaterally to detail the proportion of MU pool available and volitionally activated. We examined MUAPAMP-RT and MFR-RT relationships with linear regression and extracted the regression line slope, y-intercept, and RT range for each contraction. Linear mixed effect modelling used to analyze the effect of group and limb on regression line slope and RT range. Results: Individuals with ACLR demonstrated lower MVIC torque in the involved limb compared to uninvolved limb. There were no differences in H-reflex or CAR between groups or limbs. The ACLR involved limb demonstrated smaller mass-normalized RT range and slower MU firing rates at high contraction intensities (70% and 100% MVIC) compared to uninvolved and control limbs. The ACLR involved limb also demonstrated larger MU action potentials in the VM compared to the contralateral limb. These differences were largely attenuated with relative RT normalization. Conclusions: These results suggest that persistent strength deficits following ACLR may be attributable to a diminished quadriceps motor neuron pool and inability to upregulate the firing rate of recruited MUs.

The effect of modelling parameters in the development and validation of knee joint models on ligament mechanics: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The ligaments in the knee are prone to injury especially during dynamic activities. The resulting instability can have a profound impact on a patient's daily activities and functional capacity. Musculoskeletal knee modelling provides a non-invasive tool for investigating ligament force-strain behaviour in various dynamic scenarios, as well as potentially complementing existing pre-planning tools to optimise surgical reconstructions. However, despite the development and validation of many musculoskeletal knee models, the effect of modelling parameters on ligament mechanics has not yet been systematically reviewed. OBJECTIVES: This systematic review aimed to investigate the results of the most recent studies using musculoskeletal modelling techniques to create models of the native knee joint, focusing on ligament mechanics and modelling parameters in various simulated movements. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, and IEEE Xplore. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Databases were searched for articles containing any numerical ligament strain or force data on the intact, ACL-deficient, PCL-deficient, or lateral extra-articular reconstructed (LER) knee joints. The studies had to derive these results from musculoskeletal modelling methods. The dates of the publications were between 1 January 1995 and 30 November 2021. METHOD: A customised data extraction form was created to extract each selected study's critical musculoskeletal model development parameters. Specific parameters of the musculoskeletal knee model development used in each eligible study were independently extracted, including the (1) musculoskeletal model definition (i.e., software used for modelling, knee type, source of geometry, the inclusion of cartilage and menisci, and articulating joints and joint boundary conditions (i.e., number of degrees of freedom (DoF), subjects, type of activity, collected data and type of simulation)), (2) specifically ligaments modelling techniques (i.e., ligament bundles, attachment points, pathway, wrapping surfaces and ligament material properties such as stiffness and reference length), (3) sensitivity analysis, (4) validation approaches, (5) predicted ligament mechanics (i.e., force, length or strain) and (6) clinical applications if available. The eligible papers were then discussed quantitatively and qualitatively with respect to the above parameters. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: From the 1004 articles retrieved by the initial electronic search, only 25 met all inclusion criteria. The results obtained by aggregating data reported in the eligible studies indicate that considerable variability in the predicted ligament mechanics is caused by differences in geometry, boundary conditions and ligament modelling parameters. CONCLUSION: This systematic review revealed that there is currently a lack of consensus on knee ligament mechanics. Despite this lack of consensus, some papers highlight the potential of developing translational tools using musculoskeletal modelling. Greater consistency in model design, incorporation of sensitivity assessment of the model outcomes and more rigorous validation methods should lead to better agreement in predictions for ligament mechanics between studies. The resulting confidence in the musculoskeletal model outputs may lead to the development of clinical tools that could be used for patient-specific treatments.