Maternal and neonatal effects of epidural levobupivacaine combined with fentanyl or sufentanil for elective cesarean-section in brachycephalic breeds.

The aim of this study was to compare the safety and clinical efficacy of epidural levobupivacaine combined with fentanyl or sufentanil for bitches undergoing elective cesarean-section and the impact of these anesthetic protocols on neonatal viability. The anesthetic protocol consisted of intramuscular morphine (0.2 mg/kg), followed by an intravenous bolus of propofol, in a dose sufficient to allowed the puncture of the lumbosacral space. The dogs were randomly allocated to receive 0.5 % levobupivacaine plus fentanyl (2.5 µg/kg; LF: n = 9) or sufentanil (1 µg/kg; LS; n = 11). Maternal cardiorespiratory parameters were monitored at specific time points during surgery. Intraoperative propofol supplementation was based on the presence of head and/or thoracic limb movements. Neonatal reflex responses and the Apgar score (range 0-10 points) were assessed at 5 and 60 minutes after birth. Puppy mortality rate was recorded until 24 hours after birth. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA, Tukey's test, Wilcoxon signed rank test, and Fisher's exact test (P < 0.05). Intraoperatively, maternal cardiorespiratory variables and propofol requirements were similar between groups, with no detection of anesthetic complications. The puppy reflex responses did not differ between groups at any time point. The medians (range) of Apgar scores were lower (P = 0.016) in the LF [5 (1-9)] at 5 minutes in comparison with LS [6 (2-9)], while no intergroup differences were recorded at 60 minutes [LF = 8 (2-10); LS = 9 (6-10]. The total mortality rate was 4.1 %. In the LS group, no puppies died, while in the LF 8 % of the puppies died in the first 24 hours after birth (P = 0.11). Epidural levobupivacaine combined with fentanyl or sufentanil provided minimal maternal and neonatal adverse effects, but neither protocol enabled the performance of a C-section in 100 % of the French and English bulldogs, without propofol supplementation.

Levobupivacaine-Loaded Liposome Associated with Thermogel for Prolonged Analgesia.

Pain is a phenomenon present in the majority of the population, affecting, among others, the elderly, overweight people, and especially recently operated patients, analgesia being necessary. In the specific case of relief of postoperative pain, different kinds of anesthetics are being used, among them bupivacaine, a widely used drug which promotes long-lasting analgesic effects. However, cardiotoxicity and neurotoxicity are related to its repetitive use. To overcome these shortcomings, Novabupi® (a racemic mixture) was developed and is marketed as an injectable solution. This formulation contains an enantiomeric excess of the levogyre isomer, which has reduced toxicity effects. Seeking to rationalize its use by extending the duration of effect and reducing the number of applications, the objectives of this work were to develop and evaluate liposomes containing Novabupi (LBPV), followed by incorporation into thermogel. Liposomes were prepared using the lipid hydration method, followed by size reduction using sonication, and the developed formulations were characterized by hydrodynamic diameter, polydispersity index (PDI), surface zeta potential, and encapsulation efficiency. The selected optimal liposomal formulation was successfully incorporated into a thermogel without loss of thermoresponsive properties, being suitable for administration as a subcutaneous injection. In the ex vivo permeation studies with fresh rodent skin, the thermogel with liposomes loaded with 0.5% LBPV (T-gel formulation 3) showed higher permeation rates compared to the starting formulation, thermogel with 0.5% LBPV (T-Gel 1), which will probably translate into better therapeutic benefits for treatment of postoperative analgesia, especially with regard to the number of doses applied.

Management of urethral obstruction in a cat with epidural sacrococcygeal anesthesia guided by electrical neurostimulation

Background: The treatment for urethral obstruction in cats consists of catheterization, and for this, the cat must be sedated or anesthetized. Sacococcygeal epidural block has the advantage of being close to receptors related to nociception located in the spinal cord and it is safer because it represents lower risk of spinal cord injury or inadvertent application in the subarachnoid space, when compared to the lumbosacral epidural. Nerve stimulation through the neurolocator to identify the epidural space increases the accuracy of this technique. Thus, the objective is to report a case of epidural anesthesia with a sacrococcygeal approach guided by neurostimulation in a cat with urethral obstruction. Case: A 4-year-old male Siamese cat, weighing 4 kg, was referred to the veterinary care with a history of apathy and anorexia for 2 days. From the physical exam, the clinical diagnosis of urethral obstruction was made, and to desobstruction, we chose to perform sacrococcygeal epidural block. Initially, the patient was anesthetized with propofol (4 mg/kg) and midazolam (0.3 mg/kg). To perform the anesthetic block, the cat was placed in sternal decubitus with the hind limbs extended cranially to perform sacrococcygeal epidural block. The positive pole (cathode) was connected to the skin of the right inguinal region at the caudal aspect of the thigh and the neurostimulator was turned on and adjusted to 0.7 mA of stimulating current intensity, 0.1 ms duration and 1 Hz frequency. The needle for electrical neurolocation was introduced in the dorsal midline, perpendicular to the skin surface, between the spinous processes of S3-Cd1 in the skin. The exact injection point was obtained observed by the muscular response of the middle and distal third of the animal's tail with the neurostimulator adjusted to 0.3 mA of intensity, in the same duration and frequency as before. The total volume of 0.9 mL (0.22 mL/kg) of solution containing the combination of 0.6 mL of 0.75% levobupivacaine and 0.3 mL of 2% lidocaine was injected. The success of the block was confirmed by the loss of reflexes of the pelvic limbs and anal sphincter 10 min after the administration of the anesthetic solution. Discussion: In this case, the use of the neurolocator helped to perform an effective sacrococcygeal block, allowing urethral catheterization without the addition of other analgesic agents. This technique desensitizes and relaxes muscles in the regions of the perineum, anus, distal colon and penis, being useful for performing urethral catheterization. The use of smaller anaesthetic volumes to perform sacrococcygeal block makes it possible to achieve a more localized anesthesia, without affecting the motor function of the pelvic limbs. However, in our report, using a combination of levobupivacaine and lidocaine, the pelvic limb block was also verified despite the low volume applied. A hypothesis that could justify the different responses in relation to the pelvic limb block compared to other studies would be due to the different physicalchemical properties of the drugs used. Lidocaine is known to be less fat-soluble than bupivacaine, so it tends to spread more through the epidural space, in order to result in more extensive blocks. The use of a neurostimulator using a fixed electric current of 0.7 mA, pulse 0.1 ms and a frequency of 1 Hz allowed the correct identification of the needle position for the application of the anesthetic.

[Efficacy of ultrasound guided suprascapular block in patients with chronic shoulder pain: retrospective observational study]. / Eficácia do bloqueio do nervo supraescapular guiado por ultrassom em pacientes com dor crônica no ombro: estudo observacional retrospectivo.

INTRODUCTION: Painful shoulder syndrome is a frequent condition among the elderly and an important cause of functional disability. As the conservative is not always effective, ultrasound guided suprascapular nerve blockade presents as an important alternative treatment. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the use of 0.25% levobupivacaine and 40 mg of triamcinolone in the suprascapular nerve blockade in patients with chronic pain in the shoulder. METHODS: A retrospective, descriptive and analytical study of 71 patients submitted to suprascapular nerve infiltration between August 2014 and March 2017. Surveys were carried out to patients before the technique was performed, after 72 hours, at 1, 3 and 6 months. Pain intensity was assessed using a numeric pain scale (NPS). RESULTS: Out of the 71 patients who underwent a blockade of the suprascapular nerve, 81.2% reported a decrease in pain at 72 hours. In the first, third and sixth month, respectively, 89.8%, 76.1% and 61.8% of the patients presented pain relief. A statistically significant difference (p<0.001) was verified between NPS and the 4 moments assessed after the technique. 43.7% had total pain remission (NPS=0) at six months. Global effectiveness of suprascapular nerve blockade was 60.6% and for the subgroup of patients with rotators' cuff patology was 62.2%. No complications were reported regarding the suprascapular nerve block. CONCLUSION: The results show that ultrasound-guided blockade of the suprascapular nerve using 0.25% levobupivacaine and 40 mg of triamcinolone is a safe and effective treatment in patients with chronic shoulder pain.

Efficacy of ultrasound guided suprascapular block in patients with chronic shoulder pain: observational, retrospective study / Eficácia do bloqueio do nervo supraescapular guiado por ultrassom em pacientes com dor crônica no ombro: estudo observacional retrospectivo

Abstract Introduction: Painful shoulder syndrome is a frequent condition among the elderly and an important cause of functional disability. As the conservative treatment is not always effective, ultrasound guided suprascapular nerve blockade presents as an important alternative treatment. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the use of 0.25% levobupivacaine and 40 mg of triamcinolone in the suprascapular nerve blockade in patients with chronic pain in the shoulder. Methods: A retrospective, descriptive and analytical study of 71 patients submitted to suprascapular nerve infiltration between August 2014 and March 2017. Surveys were carried out to patients before the technique was performed, after 72 hours and at 1, 3 and 6 months. Pain intensity was assessed using a numeric pain scale (NPS). Results: Out of the 71 patients who underwent a blockade of the suprascapular nerve, 81.2% reported a decrease in pain at 72 hours. In the first, third and sixth month, respectively, 89.8%, 76.1% and 61.8% of the patients presented pain relief. A statistically significant difference (p < 0.001) was verified between NPS and the 4 moments assessed after the technique. 43.7% had total pain remission (NPS = 0) at six months. Global effectiveness of suprascapular nerve blockade was 60.6% and for the subgroup of patients with rotators' cuff patology was 62.2%. No complications were reported regarding the suprascapular nerve block. Conclusion: The results show that ultrasound-guided blockade of the suprascapular nerve using 0.25% levobupivacaine and 40 mg of triamcinolone is a safe and effective treatment in patients with chronic shoulder pain.

Resumo Introdução: A síndrome do ombro doloroso é uma condição frequente entre os idosos e uma causa importante de incapacidade funcional na população em geral. O tratamento conservador nem sempre é eficaz, pelo que o bloqueio do nervo supraescapular guiado por ecografia apresenta-se como uma opção de tratamento válida. Objetivo: Avaliação da eficácia e segurança do uso de levobupivacaína a 0,25% e 40 mg de triancinolona no bloqueio do nervo supraescapular ecoguiado em doentes com dor crônica no ombro. Métodos: Realizou-se um estudo retrospectivo observacional, descritivo e analítico com 71 doentes submetidos à infiltração do nervo supraescapular entre agosto de 2014 e março de 2017. Foram aplicados questionários antes da realização da técnica, após 72 horas; 1, 2 e 6 meses. A intensidade da dor foi avaliada usando a Escala de Avaliação Numérica (EAN). Resultados: Dos 71 doentes submetidos ao bloqueio do nervo supraescapular; 81,2% referiram diminuição da dor às 72 horas. Aos primeiro, terceiro e sexto mês, respectivamente 89,8%; 76,1% e 61,8% apresentaram melhoria da dor. Verificou-se uma diferença estatisticamente significativa (p < 0,001), entre a EAN inicial e os 4 momentos após a realização da técnica. 43,7% dos doentes tiveram remissão total da dor (EAN = 0) aos seis meses. A eficácia global do bloqueio do nervo supraescapular foi de 60,6% e, para o subgrupo com patologia da coifa dos rotadores, de 62,2%. Nenhuma complicação do bloqueio do NSE foi registrada. Conclusão: Este estudo mostra que o bloqueio eco-guiado do NSE usando levobupivacaína a 0,25% e 40 mg de triancinolona é um procedimento seguro e eficaz em doentes com dor crônica no ombro.

Hemidiaphragmatic paralysis with continuous interscalene block and diluted solutions of levobupivacaine / Bloqueo interescalénico y parálisis diafragmática con dosis diluidas de levobupivacaína

The continuous interscalene block represents the analgesic standard for shoulder surgery. However, the incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis can reach up to 100% of cases. We hypothesized that more dilute local anesthetics would decrease the phrenic palsy at 24 hours. METHODS: Prospective series of patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery with continuous interscalene block. A 15-ml bolus of lidocaine 1%-levobupivacaine 0.25% plus an infusion of levobupivacaine 0.04% at an 8 mL/h rate plus 5 mL boluses on-demand with a 20-minutes lockout was used until discharge. Hemidiaphragmatic excursion was evaluated with M-mode ultrasound in the subcostal region before blocks, in the post-anesthetic unit, and at 24 h. The primary outcome was the presence of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis at 24 hours. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain, amount of rescue boluses, postoperative opioids consumption, and side effects. RESULTS: Thirty patients were recruited and analyzed. The incidence of diaphragm paralysis at 24 h was 96.7%. The median [IQR] of pain at rest (patients with shoulder immobilizer) in a NRS from 0 to 10 at 0.5; 1; 3; 6; 12; 24; 48; 72 hours were 0 [0-0]; 0 [0-0]; 0 [0-0]; 0 [0-0]; 0 [0-0]; 0 [0-2]; 0 [0-2.5]; 0 [0-2], respectively. The median [IQR] consumption of LA boluses was 1.5 [0-7]. There were no postoperative morphine requirements. The most frequent side effect was Horner´s syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous interscalene block with 0.04% levobupivacaine provides adequate analgesia for arthroscopic shoulder surgery but does not prevent hemidiaphragmatic paralysis at 24 hours under the conditions of this study.

El bloqueo interescalénico representa el estándar analgésico para cirugía de hombro. No obstante, la incidencia de parálisis hemidiafragmática puede alcanzar 100% de los casos. Nuestra hipótesis es que infusiones con anestésicos locales más diluidos disminuirían la PHD 24 horas postbloqueo. MÉTODOS: Serie prospectiva de pacientes sometidos a cirugía artroscópica electiva de hombro con bloqueo interescalénico continuo. Un bolo de 15 mL de lidocaína 1%-levobupivacaína 0,5% más infusión postoperatoria de levobupivacaína al 0,04% a 8 ml/h más bolos a demanda de 5 mL con intervalo de 20 minutos hasta el alta. La excursión hemidiafragmática se evaluó con ultrasonido con transductor curvo 2-5 MHz en modo M en la región infracostal antes del bloqueo, en la unidad postanestésica y a las 24 h, antes del alta. El outcome primario fue la presencia de parálisis hemidiafragmática 24 horas postbloqueo. Los resultados secundarios incluyeron dolor postoperatorio, total de bolos de rescate, requerimiento de opioides postoperatorios y efectos secundarios. RESULTADOS: Treinta pacientes fueron reclutados y analizados. La incidencia de PHD a las 24 h fue 96,7%. La mediana [RIC] de dolor en reposo (pacientes con inmovilizador de hombro) medido en escala numérica de 0 a 10, a las 0,5; 1; 3; 6; 12; 24; 48; 72 horas fueron 0 [0-0]; 0 [0-0]; 0 [0-0]; 0 [0-0]; 0 [0-0]; 0 [0-2]; 0 [0-2.5]; 0 [0-2] respectivamente. La mediana [RIC] de consumo de bolos de rescate fue 1,5 [0-7]. No hubo pacientes con requerimientos de morfina postoperatoria. El efecto colateral más frecuente fue el síndrome de Horner. CONCLUSIONES: El bloqueo interescalénico continuo con levobupivacaína 0,04% proporciona analgesia postoperatoria adecuada, pero no evita la PHD a las 24 h en las condiciones de esta serie.

Concentración de bupivacaína y preservación de fuerza de cuádriceps en bloqueo femoral para artroplastía total de rodilla / Bupivacaine concentration and quadriceps strength preservation in femoral nerve block for total

INTRODUCTION: The commonly used concentrations of local anesthetics (LA) for femoral nerve block (FNB) cause a significant decrease in the quadriceps strength (QS), limiting physiotherapy and determining a risk factor for patient's falls. The use of more dilute solutions could determine the preservation of motor function without impairing analgesia. METHODS: Five patients scheduled for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) received a preoperative FNB with 20 mL of bupivacaine in decreasing concentrations (0.0875%, 0.075%, 0.0625%, 0.050%, 0.0375%). Sensory block to cold in the anterior knee region, QS, surface electromyography (SEMG) of vastus lateralis (VL), vastus medialis (VM) and rectus femoris (RF) plus were recorded before and 30 minutes after the blockage. Posteriorly, the clinical data of 20 patients who underwent TKA and received a continuous femoral nerve block (CFNB) with bupivacaine in the most dilute concentration that granted sensory blockade and significantly preserved the QS in the previous analysis were retrospectively analyzed. Postoperative pain at 24 and 48 hours, morphine consumption at 24 hours, the ability to successfully perform physiotherapy on the first postoperative day (POD) and reports of falls were rescued from the patients' files. Finally, seventy-five patients that underwent TKA during 2018 who received a CFNB with a similar dilution, but using levobupivacaine, were also retrospectively analyzed. Postoperative pain, need for advanced rescue analgesia, ability to perform physiotherapy, CFNB related complications and reports of patients falls during the first 72 hours post-surgery were obtained. RESULTS: Biomechanical study: of the 5 concentrations analyzed, either 0.050% or 0.0375% bupivacaine were adequate producing sensory block and preserving 94% and 100% of the basal QS, respectively. With both concentrations, the SEMG showed a similar range of activation with respect to baseline values. Bupivacaine case series: Twenty patients undergoing TKA received a 5-8 mL/hr infusion of 0.037% bupivacaine. The average consumption of morphine at 24 hours was 3.9 (3.6) mg. The median [IQR] of dynamic postoperative pain at 24 and 48 hours was 3 [1-4] and 3 [2-5]. All patients had adequate active joint ranges at 24 hours and physiotherapy was not limited by significant motor block. No falls were reported during the stay. Levobupivacaine case series: seventy-five patients undergoing TKA received a 5-8 mL/hr infusion of 0.037% levobupivacaine. The median [IQR] of at rest (R) and dynamic (D) postoperative pain at 24, 48 and 72 hours were R24: 0 [0-3]; D24: 3 [1-5]; R48: 0 [0-2]; D48: 3 [1.5-5]; R72: 0 [0-1]; D72: 3 [1-4]. 21% of patients required adding a PCA mode to the CFNB and a 7% a morphine PCA. On POD 1, 4% of patients were not able to adequately perform rehabilitation. On POD 2 and 3, all patients had adequate active joint ranges and physiotherapy was not limited by significant motor block. There were also no falls during hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: The use of diluted solutions of bupivacaine and levobupivacaine for CFNB may represent a good alternative for TKA postoperative analgesia while avoiding significant quadriceps paresis. Additional studies are necessary to determine the ideal concentration and administration regimen to then compare with other quadriceps sparing analgesic alternatives.

INTRODUCCIÓN: Las concentraciones habituales de anestésicos locales (AL) utilizadas para el bloqueo del nervio femoral (BNF) provocan una disminución significativa de la fuerza del cuádriceps (FC), limitando la fisioterapia y constituyendo un factor de riesgo de caídas de pacientes. El uso de soluciones más diluidas podría determinar preservación de la función motora sin perjudicar la analgesia. MÉTODOS: Cinco pacientes programados para artroplastía total de rodilla (ATR) recibieron un BNF preoperatorio con 20 mL de bupivacaína en concentraciones decrecientes (0,0875%, 0,075%, 0,0625%, 0,050%, 0,0375%). Se registró la FC, electromiografía de superficie (EMGS) de vasto lateral (VL), vasto medial (VM) y recto femoral (RF) y el bloqueo sensitivo al frío antes y 30 minutos después del bloqueo. Posteriormente, se analizó retrospectivamente 20 casos sometidos a ATR que recibieron un bloqueo continuo del nervio femoral (BCNF) con bupivacaína en la concentración más diluida que otorgó bloqueo sensitivo y preservó significativamente la fuerza basal del cuádriceps durante el análisis anterior. El dolor postoperatorio a las 24 y 48 horas, el consumo de morfina las primeras 24 horas, la capacidad de realizar con éxito la fisioterapia el primer día postoperatorio (DPO) y reporte de caídas fueron rescatados de los expedientes. Por último, también se analizó retrospectivamente un grupo de 75 pacientes sometidos a ATR durante el 2018 y que recibieron un BCNF con una dilución similar, pero de levobupivacaína. Se obtuvieron datos de dolor, requerimientos de rescate analgésico, capacidad de realizar rehabilitación, complicaciones del BCNF y reporte de caídas durante las primeras 72 horas postoperatorias. RESULTADOS: Estudio biomecánico: de las 5 concentraciones analizadas, tanto bupivacaína 0,05% como 0,0375% produjeron adecuado bloqueo sensorial preservando el 94% y el 100% de la FC, respectivamente. Con ambas concentraciones la EMGS mostró similar rango de activación respecto a valores basales. Serie de casos con bupivacaína: veinte pacientes sometidos a ATR recibieron una infusión de bupivacaína 0,037% a 5-8 mL/h. El consumo promedio de morfina a las 24 horas fue 3,9 (3,6) mg. La mediana [RIC] del dolor dinámico postoperatorio a las 24 y 48 horas fue 3 [1-4] y 3 [2-5]. Todos los pacientes tuvieron rangos articulares activos adecuados a las 24 horas y la fisioterapia no fue limitada por bloqueo motor significativo. No se registraron caídas durante la hospitalización. Serie de casos levobupivacaína: setenta y cinco pacientes sometidos a ATR recibieron una infusión de levobupivacaína 0,037% a 5-8 mL/h. La mediana [RIC] de dolor postoperatorio en reposo (R) y dinámico (D) a las 24, 48 y 72 horas fue R24: 0 [0-3]; D24: 3 [1-5]; R48: 0 [0-2]; D48: 3 [1.5-5]; R72: 0 [0-1]; D72: 3 [1-4]. Un 21% requirió agregar modo PCA al BCNF y 7% una PCA de morfina. En DPO 1, un 4% de pacientes no pudo realizar adecuadamente la rehabilitación. En DPO 2 y 3 todos los pacientes tuvieron rangos articulares activos adecuados y fisioterapia no fue limitada por bloqueo motor significativo. Tampoco se registraron caídas durante la hospitalización. CONCLUSIONES: El uso de soluciones diluidas de bupivacaína y levobupivacaína en BCNF podría representar una buena opción para analgesia postoperatoria en ATR evitando la paresia significativa del cuádriceps. Estudios adicionales son necesarios para determinar la concentración y régimen de administración ideal para luego comparar con otras alternativas analgésicas preservantes del cuádriceps.

Ultrasound-guided adductor canal block using levobupivacaine versus periarticular levobupivacaine infiltration after totalknee arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Both postoperative pain control and range of motion are important in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, in the literature, there is little comparison of peripheral nerve blocks and periarticular infiltration techniques using levobupivacaine. The aim of our study was to measure pain with visual analogue scale (VAS) and knee range of motion (ROM) between in patients undergoing adductor canal block (ACB) for TKA using levobupivacaine compared to periarticular levobupivacaine infiltration (PAI-L). DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective randomized clinical trial in a university hospital. METHODS: Patients aged 40-85 years who underwent unilateral TKA were included; 39 were treated withperiarticular infiltration using 40 ml (0.125 mg) of levobupivacaine (PAI-L group); and 40 were treated with ACB using 20 ml of 0.25% levobupivacaine (ACB-L group). Postoperative pain scores at rest and during active physical therapy were assessed using a VAS, along with knee ROM in flexion and extension. In addition, 100-foot walking time results, total morphine consumption and time of first analgesia requirement were recorded postoperatively. RESULTS: VAS scores at rest and during active physical therapy and the total amount of morphine consumed were lower in the ACB-L group than in the PAI-L group (P < 0.05). In contrast, knee ROM in flexion and extension and 100-foot walking times were greater in the PAI-L group than in the ACB-L group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: ACB-L was superior to PAI-L regarding pain treatment after TKA; however, PAI-L was superior to ACB-L regarding postoperative ROM and walking ability. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY: ACTRN-12618000438257.

Ultrasound-guided adductor canal block using levobupivacaine versus periarticular levobupivacaine infiltration after totalknee arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Both postoperative pain control and range of motion are important in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, in the literature, there is little comparison of peripheral nerve blocks and periarticular infiltration techniques using levobupivacaine. The aim of our study was to measure pain with visual analogue scale (VAS) and knee range of motion (ROM) between in patients undergoing adductor canal block (ACB) for TKA using levobupivacaine compared to periarticular levobupivacaine infiltration (PAI-L). DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective randomized clinical trial in a university hospital. METHODS: Patients aged 40-85 years who underwent unilateral TKA were included; 39 were treated withperiarticular infiltration using 40 ml (0.125 mg) of levobupivacaine (PAI-L group); and 40 were treated with ACB using 20 ml of 0.25% levobupivacaine (ACB-L group). Postoperative pain scores at rest and during active physical therapy were assessed using a VAS, along with knee ROM in flexion and extension. In addition, 100-foot walking time results, total morphine consumption and time of first analgesia requirement were recorded postoperatively. RESULTS: VAS scores at rest and during active physical therapy and the total amount of morphine consumed were lower in the ACB-L group than in the PAI-L group (P < 0.05). In contrast, knee ROM in flexion and extension and 100-foot walking times were greater in the PAI-L group than in the ACB-L group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: ACB-L was superior to PAI-L regarding pain treatment after TKA; however, PAI-L was superior to ACB-L regarding postoperative ROM and walking ability. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY: ACTRN-12618000438257.

The chondrotoxic and apoptotic effects of levobupivacaine and bupivacaine on the rabbit knee joint / Os efeitos condrotóxicos e apoptóticos de levobupivacaína e bupivacaína na articulação do joelho de coelhos

Abstract Background: A single dose injection or continuous infusion of local anesthetics into the joint space is considered to be a well-defined analgesia technique. The aim of this study was to investigate the chondrotoxic and apoptotic effects of single-dose intra-articular injection of levobupivacaine and bupivacaine on rabbit knee joint tissues. Materials and methods: The animals were allocated into two groups each containing 20 rabbits. 0.5% levobupivacaine (Group L) and 0.5% bupivacaine (Group B) were applied intra-articularly to the left posterior joints of rabbits. At the same time, normal saline was applied to the right posterior leg knee joints of rabbits in both groups and used as a control (Group S). At the end of the 7th and 28th days after the intraarticular injections, ten randomly chosen rabbits in each group were killed by applying intraperitoneal thiopental. Sections of cartilage tissue samples were stained for light microscopic examinations and the TUNEL method was used to investigate apoptotic cells. Results: As a result of immunofluorescence microscopic examination, the number of apoptotic cells in Group B at day 7 and day 28 were both significantly higher than Group L and S (p < 0.05). Also, the number of apoptotic cells in Group L at day 7 and day 28 were both significantly higher than Group S (p < 0.05). Conclusions: We found that bupivacaine is more chondrotoxic than other anesthetic agent and increases the number of apoptotic cells. These results indicated that bupivacaine caused high chondrotoxic damage and it led to more apoptotic activation than levobupivacaine.

Resumo Justificativa: Uma injeção em dose única ou infusão contínua de anestésicos locais no espaço articular é considerada uma técnica de analgesia bem definida. O objetivo deste estudo foi investigar os efeitos condrotóxicos e apoptóticos da injeção intra-articular com dose única de levobupivacaína e bupivacaína em tecidos articulares do joelho de coelho. Material e métodos: Os animais foram alocados em dois grupos, cada um contendo 20 coelhos. Levobupivacaína a 0,5% (Grupo L) e bupivacaína a 0,5% (Grupo B) foram aplicadas intra-articularmente nas articulações posteriores esquerdas de coelhos. Ao mesmo tempo, solução salina normal foi aplicada nas articulações do joelho da perna posterior direita de coelhos em ambos os grupos e usada como controle (Grupo S). Ao fim do 7° e 28° dias após as injeções intra-articulares, 10 coelhos escolhidos aleatoriamente em cada grupo foram mortos por aplicação de tiopental intraperitoneal. Seções de amostras de tecido cartilaginoso foram coradas para exames de microscopia de luz, e o método TUNEL foi usado para investigar células apoptóticas. Resultados: Como resultado do exame microscópico de imunofluorescência nos dias 7 e 28, o número de células apoptóticas no Grupo B foi significativamente maior que nos grupos L e S (p < 0,05). Além disso, o número de células apoptóticas nos dias 7 e 28 foi significativamente maior no Grupo L do que no Grupo S (p < 0,05). Conclusões: Demonstramos que a bupivacaína é mais condrotóxica do que o outro agente anestésico e aumenta o número de células apoptóticas. Esses resultados indicaram que a bupivacaína causou intensa lesão condrotóxica e levou a uma ativação apoptótica maior do que a levobupivacaína.

Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: comparison of efficacy of bupivacaine and levobupivacaine on postoperative pain control / Bloqueio do plano abdominal transverso guiado por ultrassom em pacientes submetidos à colecistectomia laparoscópica: comparação da eficácia de bupivacaína e levobupivacaína no controle da dor pós-operatória

Abstract Background and objective The use of transversus abdominis plane block with different local anesthetics is considered as a part of multimodal analgesia regimen in laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients. However no studies have been published comparing bupivacaine and levobupivacaine for transversus abdominis plane block. We aimed to compare bupivacaine and levobupivacaine in ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods Fifty patients (ASA I/II), undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly allocated into two groups. Following anesthesia induction, ultrasound-guided bilateral transversus abdominis plane block was performed with 30 mL of bupivacaine 0.25% in Group B (n = 25) and 30 mL of levobupivacaine 0.25% in Group L (n = 25) for each side. The level of pain was evaluated using 10 cm visual analog scale (VAS) at rest and during coughing 1, 5, 15, 30 min and 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 and 24 h after the operation. When visual analogue scale > 3, the patients received IV tenoxicam 20 mg. If visual analogue scale remained >3, they received IV. tramadol 1 mg.kg−1. In case of inadequate analgesia, a rescue analgesic was given. The analgesic requirement, time to first analgesic requirement was recorded. Results Visual analogue scale levels showed no difference except first and fifth minutes postoperatively where VAS was higher in Group L (p < 0.05). Analgesic requirement was similar in both groups. Time to first analgesic requirement was shorter in Group L (4.35 ± 6.92 min vs. 34.91 ± 86.26 min, p = 0.013). Conclusions Bupivacaine and levobupivacaine showed similar efficacy at TAP block in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Resumo Justificativa e objetivo O uso do bloqueio do plano transverso abdominal com diferentes anestésicos locais é considerado como parte do regime de analgesia multimodal em pacientes submetidos à colecistectomia laparoscópica. No entanto, nenhum estudo comparando bupivacaína e levobupivacaína para bloqueio do plano transverso abdominal foi publicado. Nosso objetivo foi comparar bupivacaína e levobupivacaína em bloqueio do plano transverso abdominal guiado por ultrassom em pacientes submetidos à colecistectomia laparoscópica. Métodos Cinquenta pacientes (ASA I/II), submetidos à colecistectomia laparoscópica foram alocados aleatoriamente em dois grupos. Após a indução da anestesia, o bloqueio do plano transverso abdominal bilateral guiado por ultrassom foi realizado com 30 mL de bupivacaína a 0,25% no Grupo B (n = 25) e 30 mL de levobupivacaína a 0,25% no Grupo L (n = 25) para cada lado. O nível de dor foi avaliado usando a escala visual analógica de 10 cm em repouso e durante a tosse em 1, 5, 15, 30 minutos e em 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 e 24 horas após a operação. Quando a escala visual analógica > 3, os pacientes receberam 10 mg de tenoxicam por via intravenosa (IV). Se a escala visual analógica permanecesse > 3, os pacientes recebiam tramadol IV (1 mg.kg−1). Em caso de analgesia inadequada, um analgésico de resgate foi administrado. A necessidade de analgésico e o tempo até a primeira solicitação de analgésico foram registrados. Resultados Os escores da escala visual analógica não mostraram diferença, exceto no primeiro e quinto minutos de pós-operatório, onde a escala visual analógica foi maior no Grupo L (p < 0,05). A necessidade de analgésico foi semelhante em ambos os grupos. O tempo até a primeira solicitação de analgésico foi menor no Grupo L (4,35 ± 6,92 min vs. 34,91 ± 86,26 min, p = 0,013). Conclusões Bupivacaína e levobupivacaína apresentaram eficácia similar no bloqueio TAP em pacientes submetidos à colecistectomia laparoscópica.

[The chondrotoxic and apoptotic effects of levobupivacaine and bupivacaine on the rabbit knee joint]. / Os efeitos condrotóxicos e apoptóticos de levobupivacaína e bupivacaína na articulação do joelho de coelhos.

BACKGROUND: A single dose injection or continuous infusion of local anesthetics into the joint space is considered to be a well-defined analgesia technique. The aim of this study was to investigate the chondrotoxic and apoptotic effects of single-dose intra-articular injection of levobupivacaine and bupivacaine on rabbit knee joint tissues. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The animals were allocated into two groups each containing 20 rabbits. 0.5% levobupivacaine (Group L) and 0.5% bupivacaine (Group B) were applied intra-articularly to the left posterior joints of rabbits. At the same time, normal saline was applied to the right posterior leg knee joints of rabbits in both groups and used as a control (Group S). At the end of the 7th and 28th days after the intraarticular injections, ten randomly chosen rabbits in each group were killed by applying intraperitoneal thiopental. Sections of cartilage tissue samples were stained for light microscopic examinations and the TUNEL method was used to investigate apoptotic cells. RESULTS: As a result of immunofluorescence microscopic examination, the number of apoptotic cells in Group B at day 7 and day 28 were both significantly higher than Group L and S (p<0.05). Also, the number of apoptotic cells in Group L at day 7 and day 28 were both significantly higher than Group S (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We found that bupivacaine is more chondrotoxic than other anesthetic agent and increases the number of apoptotic cells. These results indicated that bupivacaine caused high chondrotoxic damage and it led to more apoptotic activation than levobupivacaine.

Effects of local anesthetics on wound healing / Efeitos dos anestésicos locais na cicatrização de feridas

Abstract Introduction Local anesthetic infiltration is used widely for post-operative analgesia in many situations. However the effects of local anesthetics on wound healing are not demonstrated clearly. This study planned to evaluate the effects of lidocaine, prilocaine, bupivacaine and levobupivacaine on wound healing, primarily on wound tensile strength and on collagen ultrastructure. Methods This study was conducted on male Sprague Dawley rats. On days 0, 8th, 15th, and 21st, all animals were weighed and received a preincisional subcutaneous infiltration of 3 mL of a solution according the group. Control saline (C), lidocaine (L) 7 mg.kg-1, prilocaine (P) 2 mg.kg-1, bupivacaine (B) 2 mg.kg-1 and levobupivacaine (LVB) 2.5 mg.kg-1. The infiltrations were done at the back region 1.5 cm where incision would be performed at the upper, middle and lower part along the midline, under general anesthesia. Wound tensile strengths were measured after 0.7 cm × 2 cm of cutaneous and subcutaneous tissue samples were obtained vertical to incision from infiltrated regions. Tissue samples were also obtained for electron microscopic examination. Evaluations were on the 8th, 15th and 21st days after infiltration. Results There was no difference between groups in the weights of the rats at the 0th, 8th, 15th and 21st days. The collagen maturation was no statistically different between groups at the 8th and 15th days. The maturation scores of the B and L groups at the 21st day was significantly lower than the Group C (1.40, 1.64 and 3.56; respectively). The wound tensile strength was no statistically different between groups at the 8th and 15th days but at the 21st day the Groups B and LVB had significantly lower value than Group C (5.42, 5.54 and 6.75; respectively). Conclusion Lidocaine and prilocaine do not affect wound healing and, bupivacaine and levobupivacaine affect negatively especially at the late period.

Resumo Introdução A infiltração de anestésico local é amplamente usada para analgesia pós-operatória em muitas situações. No entanto, os efeitos dos anestésicos locais na cicatrização de feridas não foram demonstrados claramente. Neste estudo planejamos avaliar os efeitos de lidocaína, prilocaína, bupivacaína e levobupivacaína sobre a cicatrização de feridas, principalmente sobre a força tênsil da ferida e a ultraestrutura do colágeno. Métodos Este estudo foi feito em ratos machos da linhagem Sprague Dawley. Nos dias 0, 8, 15 e 21, todos os animais foram pesados e receberam uma infiltração subcutânea pré-incisional de 3 mL de uma solução, de acordo com a designação dos grupos: Grupo C recebeu salina (controle); Grupo L recebeu lidocaína (7 mg.kg-1); Grupo P recebeu prilocaína (2 mg.kg-1); Grupo B recebeu bupivacaína (2 mg.kg-1); Grupo LVB recebeu levobupivacaína (2,5 mg.kg-1). As infiltrações foram feitas na região posterior a 1,5 cm de onde a incisão seria feita na parte superior, média e inferior ao longo da linha média, sob anestesia geral. A força tênsil da ferida foi medida após amostras de 0,7 × 2 cm de tecido cutâneo e subcutâneo serem obtidas das regiões infiltradas, verticalmente à incisão. Amostras de tecido também foram obtidas para exame microscópico eletrônico. As avaliações foram feitas nos dias 8, 15 e 21 após a infiltração. Resultados Não houve diferença entre os grupos em relação ao peso dos ratos nos dias 0, 8, 15 e 21. A maturação do colágeno não foi estatisticamente diferente entre os grupos nos dias 8 e 15. Os escores de maturação dos grupos B e L no dia 21 foram significativamente inferiores aos do Grupo C (1,40, 1,64 e 3,56, respectivamente). A força tênsil da ferida não foi estatisticamente diferente entre os grupos nos dias 8 e 15, mas no dia 21 os grupos B e LVB apresentaram valores significativamente menores que o Grupo C (5,42, 5,54 e 6,75, respectivamente). Conclusão Lidocaína e prilocaína não afetam a cicatrização de feridas, enquanto bupivacaína e levobupivacaína afetam negativamente, especialmente no período tardio.

A randomized comparison between interscalene and combined infraclavicular-suprascapular blocks for arthroscopic shoulder surgery.

BACKGROUND: This randomized trial aimed to evaluate combined infraclavicular-suprascapular blocks (ICB-SSBs) as a diaphragm-sparing alternative to interscalene blocks (ISBs) for arthroscopic shoulder surgery. We hypothesized that ICB-SSB would provide equivalent postoperative analgesia to ISB 30 min after surgery without the risk of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis. METHODS: Following research ethics board approval and written informed consent, participants in the ISB group received an ultrasound-guided ISB with 20 mL of levobupivacaine 0.25% and epinephrine 5 µg·mL-1. In the ICB-SSB group, ultrasound-guided ICB (20 mL) and SSB (10 mL) were carried out using the same local anesthetic. Thirty minutes after the block was performed, a blinded investigator assessed the presence of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis. Subsequently, all patients underwent general anesthesia. Postoperatively, a blinded investigator recorded pain scores at rest at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 6, 12 and 24 hr. Consumption of intra- and postoperative narcotics was also tabulated. RESULTS: Compared to its ICB-SSB counterpart, the ISB group displayed non-equivalent (i.e., lower) postoperative pain scores at 30 min (difference of the medians, -4; 99% confidence interval [CI], -6 to -3), required less cumulative morphine iv at 24 hr (difference of the means, -6.1 mg; 95% CI, -10.5 to -1.6), and resulted in a higher incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis (18/20 vs 0/20 patients, respectively; P < 0.001). Although postoperative pain scores at one, two, and three hours appeared lower in the ISB group, the upper bounds of the 99% CIs did not exceed the equivalence margin. CONCLUSION: Compared with ICB-SSB, ISB provided non-equivalent (i.e., lower) postoperative pain scores 30 min after arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Thereafter, postoperative analgesia was comparable between the two groups. Further trials are required to compare ISB with ICB-SSB using a proximal (i.e., costoclavicular) technique for ICB. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.gov , NCT02993939. Registered 12 December 2016.

Iliohypogastric/ilioinguinal nerve block in inguinal hernia repair for postoperative pain management: comparison of the anatomical landmark and ultrasound guided techniques / Bloqueio dos nervos ílio-hipogástrico/ilioinguinal em correção de hérnia inguinal para tratamento da dor no pós-operatório: comparação entre a técnica de marcos anatômicos e a guiada por ultrassom / Bloqueo de los nervios ileohipogástrico/ilioinguinal en corrección de hernia inguinal para el tratamiento del dolor en el postoperatorio: comparación entre la técnica de marcas anatómicas y la guiada por ultrasonido

Objectives: The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of iliohypogastric/ilioinguinal nerve blocks performed with the ultrasound guided and the anatomical landmark techniques for postoperative pain management in cases of adult inguinal herniorrhaphy. Methods: 40 patients, ASA I-II status were randomized into two groups equally: in Group AN (anatomical landmark technique) and in Group ultrasound (ultrasound guided technique), iliohypogastric/ilioinguinal nerve block was performed with 20 ml of 0.5% levobupivacaine prior to surgery with the specified techniques. Pain score in postoperative assessment, first mobilization time, duration of hospital stay, score of postoperative analgesia satisfaction, opioid induced side effects and complications related to block were assessed for 24 h postoperatively. Results: VAS scores at rest in the recovery room and all the clinical follow-up points were found significantly less in Group ultrasound (p < 0.01 or p < 0.001). VAS scores at movement in the recovery room and all the clinical follow-up points were found significantly less in Group ultrasound (p < 0.001 in all time points). While duration of hospital stay and the first mobilization time were being found significantly shorter, analgesia satisfaction scores were found significantly higher in ultrasound Group (p < 0.05, p < 0.001, p < 0.001 respectively). Conclusion: According to our study, US guided iliohypogastric/ilioinguinal nerve block in adult inguinal herniorrhaphies provides a more effective analgesia and higher satisfaction of analgesia than iliohypogastric/ilioinguinal nerve block with the anatomical landmark technique. Moreover, it may be suggested that the observation of anatomical structures with the US may increase the success of the block, and minimize the block-related complications. .

Objetivo: Comparar a eficácia de bloqueios dos nervos ílio-hipogástrico/ilioinguinal feitos com a técnica guiada por ultrassom e a de marcos anatômicos para o manejo da dor no pós-operatório em casos de herniorrafia inguinal em adultos. Métodos: Foram randomicamente divididos 40 pacientes, estado físico ASA I-II, em dois grupos iguais: nos grupos AN (técnica de marcos anatômicos) e US (técnica guiada por ultrassom), o bloqueio dos nervos ílio-hipogástrico/ilioinguinal foi feito com 20 mL de levobupivacaína a 0,5% antes da cirurgia com as técnicas especificadas. Escore de dor na avaliação pós-operatória, tempo de primeira mobilização, tempo de internação hospitalar, escore de satisfação com a analgesia no pós-operatório, efeitos colaterais induzidos por opiáceos e complicações relacionadas ao bloqueio foram avaliados durante 24 horas de pós-operatório. Resultados: Escores EVAem repouso na sala de recuperação e todos os valores clínicos durante o acompanhamento foram significativamente menores no grupo ultrassom (p < 0,01 ou p < 0,001). Escores EVA em movimento na sala de recuperação e todos os valores clínicos durante o acompanhamento foram significativamente menores no grupo ultrassom (p < 0,001 em todos os tempos avaliados). Enquanto os tempos de internação e da primeira mobilização foram significativa-mente menores, os índices de satisfação com a analgesia foram significativamente maiores no grupo ultrasom (p<0,05, p< 0,001, p< 0,001, respectivamente). Conclusão: De acordo com o nosso estudo, o bloqueio dos nervos ílio-hipogástrico/ilioinguinal guiado por US em herniorrafias inguinais em adultos proporciona uma analgesia mais eficaz e maior satisfação com a analgesia ...

Objetivo: El objetivo de este estudio fue comparar la eficacia de bloqueos de los nervios ileohipogástrico/ilioinguinal realizados con la técnica guiada por ultrasonido y la de marca anatómicas para el manejo del dolor en el postoperatorio en casos de herniorrafia inguinal en adultos. Métodos: 40 pacientes, estado físico ASA I-II, fueron aleatoriamente divididos en 2 grupos iguales: grupos con técnica de marcas anatómicas) y grupo con técnica guiada por ultrasonido. El bloqueo de los nervios iliohipogástrico/ilioinguinal fue realizado con 20 mL de levobupivacaína al 0,5% antes de la cirugía con las técnicas especificadas. La puntuación de dolor en la evaluación postoperatoria, tiempo de primera movilización, tiempo de ingreso hospitalario, puntuación de satisfacción con la analgesia en el postoperatorio, efectos colaterales inducidos por opiáceos y complicaciones relacionadas con el bloqueo fueron evaluados durante 24 h de postoperatorio. Resultados: Las puntuaciones EVA en reposo en la sala de recuperación y todos los valores clínicos durante el seguimiento fueron significativamente menores en el grupo con técnica guiada por ultrasonido (p < 0,01 o p < 0,001). Las puntuaciones EVA en movimiento en la sala de recuperación y todos los valores clínicos durante el seguimiento fueron significativamente menores en el grupo con técnica guiada por ultrasonido (p < 0,001 en todos los tiempos calculados). Mientras que los tiempos de ingreso y de la primera movilización fueron significativamente menores, los índices de satisfacción con la analgesia fueron significativamente mayores en el grupo ultrasonido (p < 0,05; p < 0,001; p < 0,001 respectivamente). Conclusión: De acuerdo con nuestro estudio, el bloqueo de los nervios iliohipogástrico/ilioinguinal guiado por ultrasonido en herniorrafias ...

Comparison of the effects of epidurally administered bupivacaine and levobupivacaine in conscious dogs

Background: The epidural administration of local anaesthetic agents was advocated for use in any surgical procedure caudal to the diaphragm in dogs but was superior for procedures involving the pelvis, hind limbs, and perineal area. The aim of this study was to determine anaesthetic profiles of bupivacaine (BP) and levobupivacaine (LP) in epidural anaesthesia (EA) and to compare their effects on hemodynamics, blood gases, hematological and biochemical parameters in conscious dogs. Materials, Methods & Results: In this study, a total of 20 adult male dogs from different breeds referred to our clinics for castration purposes were used and allocated into two groups; 10 dogs in BP and 10 dogs in LP groups. In this study, each animal received a 0.5% of either BP or LP epidurally, (a fixed total volume of 0.2 mL/kg) followed by 0.3 mL saline solution to flush the dead space in the valve and catheter. Throughout the epidural anaesthesia, heart rate, respiratory rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial blood pressure, and body temperature were monitored. Similarly, during the study, haematological measurements at 0th, 2nd, 4th, 6th, and 8th h and biochemical measurements at 0th, 2nd, 4th, 6th, 8th and 24th h in blood samples were examined. Simultaneously, blood gases, and Na+ and K+ levels in arterial blood samples were measured at 0th, 30th, 60th, 120th and 240th min. Nocifensive and motor block status were qualitatively assessed at regular intervals: baseline, 5, 10, 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90, 105, 120 min and every 30 min thereafter. Duration of the analgesia was 124.9 ± 28.6 min in the BP group and 77.5 ± 16.8 min in the LP group (P < 0.05). Motor block duration was determined as 248.2 ± 44.2 min for the BP group and 185.9 ± 38.08 min for the LP group (P > 0.05). Motor and sensory block time was longer in the BP group than in the LP group, and similarly, BP generated sensory and motor block in a shorter period of time. While complete motor block was not observed in two animals in the LP group, complete motor block was seen in all the animals in the BP group. Motor block level was determined as 2.8 ± 0.4 in the LP group and 3 ± 00 in the BP group. There were no statistically significant differences between the levels of motor block. In both groups, decreased heart rate and arterial blood pressure were seen following EA. This decline was higher in the BP group. After epidural anaesthesia, slight decline in respiratory rate and body temperature were observed in both groups. There were no significant differences between the groups regarding cardiopulmonary data. Within each group, statistically significant changes in respiratory rates, body temperatures and blood pressures with regards to times were observed in both groups (P < 0.05). Discussion: Similar to the data in the literature, the duration of analgesia and motor block were longer with BP than with LP, and both agents showed close initiation analgesia and motor blockade. The reason for longer motor block by BP may be attributed to its higher lipophilic nature and penetration ability to the myeliniated motor fibrils. In present study, arterial blood pressure dropped, and this was higher in the BP group than in the LP group. These drops were attributed to the ability of sympathetic blockade of BP and LP.