Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Drugs Aging ; 36(6): 541-548, 2019 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30924096

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) is an increasingly popular analgesic technique in elderly patients with hip fracture. Despite requiring large volumes of local anaesthetic, there are no plasma pharmacokinetic data on FICB in elderly patients. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to determine the pharmacokinetic profile of a levobupivacaine 75 mg (30 mL 0.25%) FICB dose in patients aged ≥ 80 years with fractured femur. METHODS: This was a single-arm descriptive pilot study. Twelve adults aged ≥ 80 years with hip fracture received FICB performed under ultrasound guidance. Venous blood was sampled at 10, 20, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90, 105, 120 and 240 min after injection. Total plasma levobupivacaine concentration was measured by mass spectrometry. The main outcome measures were pharmacokinetic parameters, including maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax), time to reach Cmax (tmax) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve. RESULTS: The median (interquartile range [IQR]) Cmax was 0.82 µg/mL (0.47-1.03). tmax was 45 min (41:20-60:00). No evidence of toxicity was identified. Plasma levobupivacaine concentrations were below the threshold associated with toxicity in younger, healthy patients (2.6 µg/mL). No association was found between individual patient Cmax and α1-acid glycoprotein, weight or body mass index, although the study was not powered for these outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Absorption of levobupivacaine was slow and all patients had plasma concentrations below the toxic threshold. This pharmacokinetic analysis concludes that the technique appears to be well-tolerated and efficacious at reducing pain and is associated with systemic plasma concentrations unlikely to be associated with major adverse effects in elderly patients. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN27364035 (UK Clinical Trials Gateway).


Asunto(s)
Anestésicos Locales/efectos adversos , Anestésicos Locales/sangre , Fascia , Fracturas del Fémur/tratamiento farmacológico , Levobupivacaína/efectos adversos , Levobupivacaína/sangre , Bloqueo Nervioso/métodos , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anestésicos Locales/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Fracturas del Fémur/fisiopatología , Humanos , Levobupivacaína/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Paediatr Anaesth ; 29(2): 161-168, 2019 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30447167

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The local anesthetic, levobupivacaine, is the safer enantiomer of racemic bupivacaine. Present protocols for levobupivacaine are based on studies and pharmacokinetic modeling with racemic bupivacaine. AIMS: The aim is to investigate total serum levobupivacaine concentrations after a caudalepidural loading dose followed by a maintenance infusion over 48 hours in infants aged 3-6 months. METHODS: The clinical trial was conducted in eight infants aged 3-6 months, undergoing bladder exstrophy repair. Pharmacokinetic modeling allowed optimization of clinical sampling to measure total levobupivacaine and α1 -acid glycoprotein and prediction of the effect of α1 -acid glycoprotein on levobupivacaine plasma protein binding. RESULTS: The observed median total levobupivacaine serum concentration was 0.30 mg/L (range: 0.20-0.70 mg/L) at 1 hour after the loading dose of 2 mg/kg. The median total levobupivacaine concentration after 47 hours of infusion, at 0.2 mg/kg/h, was 1.21 mg/L (0.07-1.85 mg/L). Concentrations of α1 -acid glycoprotein were found to rise throughout the study period. Pharmacokinetic modeling suggested that unbound levobupivacaine quickly reached steady state at a concentration of approximately 0.03 mg/L. CONCLUSION: The study allows the development of a pharmacokinetic model, combining levobupivacaine and α1 -acid glycoprotein data. Modeling indicates that unbound levobupivacaine quickly reaches steady state once the infusion is started. Simulations suggest that it may be possible to continue the infusion beyond 48 hours.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia Epidural/métodos , Anestésicos Locales/administración & dosificación , Levobupivacaína/administración & dosificación , Orosomucoide/metabolismo , Analgesia Epidural/métodos , Anestésicos Locales/sangre , Anestésicos Locales/farmacocinética , Extrofia de la Vejiga/cirugía , Humanos , Lactante , Levobupivacaína/sangre , Levobupivacaína/farmacocinética , Dimensión del Dolor , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Postoperatorio/metabolismo , Estudios Prospectivos
3.
Reg Anesth Pain Med ; 43(8): 838-843, 2018 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29923955

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Although intravenous lipid emulsion has been proved a powerful antidote for local anesthetic toxicity, there are few pharmacokinetic data on using lipid infusion as a pretreatment for other clinical applications. We assessed the influence of lipid pretreatment on the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of levobupivacaine. METHODS: Altogether, 12 patients undergoing below-knee surgery for a fracture were randomly assigned to 2 groups (6 patients per group): pretreatment with 1.5 mL/kg lipid infusion (lipid group) or saline infusion (control subjects) followed by complete femoral and sciatic nerve block with 0.375% levobupivacaine (2.5 mg/kg). Total and free (non-protein bound) plasma levobupivacaine concentrations and triglycerides in the lipid group were determined. RESULTS: Results were given as means ± SD. Total and free maximum plasma levobupivacaine concentrations were lower in the lipid group than in control subjects (865 ± 98 vs 1145 ± 177 µg/L and 56.8 ± 7.5 vs 78.2 ± 13.7 µg/L, respectively; P < 0.01). Apparent volume of distribution and clearance were higher in the lipid group than in control subjects (211 ± 35 vs 170 ± 21 L and 35.1 ± 8.0 vs 25.8 ± 2.6 L/h, respectively; P < 0.05). Triglyceride level was significantly higher at the end of lipid infusion than baseline values (7.59 ± 1.32 vs 1.34 ± 0.39 mmol/L; P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Lipid pretreatment increased the apparent volume of distribution and clearance and decreased the maximum total and free levobupivacaine concentrations, thus offering a reasonable explanation for the effects of lipids on local anesthesia-related toxicity in humans. Rapid lipid infusion induced hypertriglyceridemia without other apparent risks in this study. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, identifier ChiCTR-TRC-14005203.


Asunto(s)
Anestésicos Locales/sangre , Bloqueo Nervioso Autónomo/métodos , Emulsiones Grasas Intravenosas/administración & dosificación , Nervio Femoral/efectos de los fármacos , Fracturas Óseas/sangre , Levobupivacaína/sangre , Nervio Ciático/efectos de los fármacos , Adulto , Anestésicos Locales/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Nervio Femoral/fisiología , Fracturas Óseas/cirugía , Humanos , Levobupivacaína/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor/efectos de los fármacos , Dimensión del Dolor/métodos , Dolor Postoperatorio/sangre , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Cuidados Preoperatorios/métodos , Nervio Ciático/fisiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...