Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 470
Filtrar
1.
Am J Surg Pathol ; 48(6): e43-e64, 2024 Jun 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38451836

RESUMEN

Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma has been recognized as a distinct entity in the World Health Organization classification of hematolymphoid neoplasms. These neoplasms are causally related to textured implants that were used worldwide until recently. Consequently, there is an increased demand for processing periprosthetic capsules, adding new challenges for surgeons, clinicians, and pathologists. In the literature, the focus has been on breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma; however, benign complications related to the placement of breast implants occur in up to 20% to 30% of patients. Imaging studies are helpful in assessing patients with breast implants for evidence of implant rupture, changes in tissues surrounding the implants, or regional lymphadenopathy related to breast implants, but pathologic examination is often required. In this review, we couple our experience with a review of the literature to describe a range of benign lesions associated with breast implants that can be associated with different clinical presentations or pathogenesis and that may require different diagnostic approaches. We illustrate the spectrum of the most common of these benign disorders, highlighting their clinical, imaging, gross, and microscopic features. Finally, we propose a systematic approach for the diagnosis and handling of breast implant specimens in general.


Asunto(s)
Implantación de Mama , Implantes de Mama , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes , Humanos , Implantes de Mama/efectos adversos , Femenino , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/patología , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/etiología , Implantación de Mama/efectos adversos , Implantación de Mama/instrumentación , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Relevancia Clínica
2.
Int J Mol Sci ; 25(6)2024 Mar 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38542490

RESUMEN

Breast Implant-Associated-Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is a rare T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma associated with breast prosthetic implants and represents a diagnostic challenge. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines, updated in 2024, recommend for diagnosis an integrated work-up that should include cell morphology, CD30 immunohistochemistry (IHC), and flow cytometry (FCM). CD30 IHC, although the test of choice for BIA-ALCL diagnosis, is not pathognomonic, and this supports the recommendation to apply a multidisciplinary approach. A close collaboration between pathologists and laboratory professionals allowed the diagnosis of three BIA-ALCLs, presented as case reports, within a series of 35 patients subjected to periprosthetic effusions aspiration from 2018 to 2023. In one case, rare neoplastic cells were identified by FCM, and this result was essential in leading the anatomopathological picture as indicative of this neoplasm. In fact, the distinction between a lymphomatous infiltrate from reactive cells may be very complex in the cytopathology and IHC setting when neoplastic cells are rare. On the other hand, one limitation of FCM analysis is the need for fresh samples. In this study, we provide evidence that a dedicated fixative allows the maintenance of an unaltered CD30 expression on the cell surface for up to 72 h.


Asunto(s)
Implantación de Mama , Implantes de Mama , Neoplasias de la Mama , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes , Humanos , Femenino , Implantes de Mama/efectos adversos , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/diagnóstico , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/etiología , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/patología , Citometría de Flujo , Implantación de Mama/efectos adversos , Exudados y Transudados/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Mama/complicaciones
3.
Life Sci Alliance ; 7(5)2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38383454

RESUMEN

Breast implants are extensively employed for both reconstructive and esthetic purposes. However, the safety of breast implants with textured surfaces has been questioned, owing to a potential correlation with anaplastic large-cell lymphoma and the recurrence of breast cancer. This study investigates the immune response elicited by different prosthetic surfaces, focusing on the comparison between macrotextured and microtextured breast implants. Through the analysis of intraoperatively harvested periprosthetic fluids and cell culture experiments on surface replicas, we demonstrate that macrotextured surfaces elicit a more pronounced chronic-like activation of leucocytes and an increased release of inflammatory cytokines, in contrast to microtextured surfaces. In addition, in vitro fluorescent imaging of leucocytes revealed an accumulation of lymphocytes within the cavities of the macrotextured surfaces, indicating that the physical entrapment of these cells may contribute to their activation. These findings suggest that the topography of implant surfaces plays a significant role in promoting a chronic-like inflammatory environment, which could be a contributing factor in the development of lymphomas associated with a wide range of implantable devices.


Asunto(s)
Implantación de Mama , Implantes de Mama , Neoplasias de la Mama , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes , Humanos , Femenino , Implantes de Mama/efectos adversos , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/etiología , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/cirugía
6.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 153(2): 262e-272e, 2024 02 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37104467

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Increased understanding of breast implant-associated anaplastic large-cell lymphoma has led to a shift away from textured breast devices. A few small studies have compared the complication rates of textured and smooth tissue expanders (TEs). The aim of this study was to compare complication profiles in patients undergoing two-stage postmastectomy breast reconstruction with either textured or smooth TEs. METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective review of female patients who underwent immediate breast reconstruction with textured or smooth TEs from 2018 to 2020 at their institution. Rates of seroma, infection/cellulitis, malposition/rotation, exposure, and TE loss were analyzed in the overall cohort and subgroups undergoing prepectoral and subpectoral TE placement. A propensity score-matched analysis was used to decrease the effects of confounders comparing textured and smooth TEs. RESULTS: The authors analyzed 3526 TEs (1456 textured and 2070 smooth). More frequent use of acellular dermal matrix, SPY angiography, and prepectoral TE placement was noted in the smooth TE cohort ( P < 0.001). Univariate analysis suggested higher rates of infection/cellulitis, malposition/rotation, and exposure in smooth TEs (all P < 0.01). Rates of TE loss did not differ. After propensity matching, no differences were noted in infection or TE loss. Prepectoral smooth expanders had increased rates of malposition/rotation. CONCLUSIONS: TE surface type did not affect rates of TE loss, although increased rates of expander malposition were noted in the smooth prepectoral cohort. Further research is needed to examine breast implant-associated anaplastic large-cell lymphoma risk with temporary textured TE exposure to improve decision-making. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCW: Therapeutic, III.


Asunto(s)
Implantes de Mama , Neoplasias de la Mama , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes , Mamoplastia , Femenino , Humanos , Dispositivos de Expansión Tisular/efectos adversos , Celulitis (Flemón)/etiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Mama/complicaciones , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/epidemiología , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/etiología , Mastectomía/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Mamoplastia/efectos adversos , Implantes de Mama/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos
8.
Aesthet Surg J ; 44(4): 383-393, 2024 Mar 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37757895

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is a type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma first linked with breast implants in 2011. The correlation between BIA-ALCL and textured devices has led to increased use of smooth devices. However, much of the data surrounding smooth and textured devices investigates breast implants specifically and not tissue expanders. OBJECTIVES: We performed a systematic review and a meta-analysis to compare surgical outcomes for smooth tissue expanders (STEs) and textured tissue expanders (TTEs). METHODS: A search was performed on PubMed, including articles from 2016 to 2023 (n = 419). Studies comparing TTEs and STEs and reported complications were included. A random-effects model was utilized for meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 5 articles met inclusion criteria, representing 1709 patients in the STE cohort and 1716 patients in the TTE cohort. The mean duration of tissue expansion with STEs was 221.25 days, while TTEs had a mean time of tissue expansion of 220.43 days.Our meta-analysis found no differences in all surgical outcomes except for explantation risk. STE use was associated with increased odds of explantation by over 50% compared to TTE use (odds ratio = 1.53; 95% CI = 1.15 to 2.02; P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, STEs and TTEs had similar complication profiles. However, STEs had 1.5 times higher odds of explantation. The incidence of BIA-ALCL is low, and only a single case of BIA-ALCL has been reported with TTEs. This indicates that TTEs are safe and may lower the risk of early complications requiring explantation. Further studies are warranted to further define the relationship between tissue expanders and BIA-ALCL.


Asunto(s)
Implantación de Mama , Implantes de Mama , Neoplasias de la Mama , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes , Humanos , Femenino , Dispositivos de Expansión Tisular/efectos adversos , Implantes de Mama/efectos adversos , Implantación de Mama/efectos adversos , Mama/cirugía , Incidencia , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/epidemiología , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/etiología , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/etiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía
9.
Aesthetic Plast Surg ; 48(4): 590-607, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37903939

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is a rare complication associated with the use of breast implants. Breast implant illness (BII) is another potentially concerning issue related to breast implants. This study aims to assess the quality of ChatGPT as a potential source of patient education by comparing the answers to frequently asked questions on BIA-ALCL and BII provided by ChatGPT and Google. METHODS: The Google and ChatGPT answers to the 10 most frequently asked questions on the search terms "breast implant associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma" and "breast implant illness" were recorded. Five blinded breast plastic surgeons were then asked to grade the quality of the answers according to the Global Quality Score (GQS). A Wilcoxon paired t-test was performed to evaluate the difference in GQS ratings for Google and ChatGPT answers. The sources provided by Google and ChatGPT were also categorized and assessed. RESULTS: In a comparison of answers provided by Google and ChatGPT on BIA-ALCL and BII, ChatGPT significantly outperformed Google. For BIA-ALCL, Google's average score was 2.72 ± 1.44, whereas ChatGPT scored an average of 4.18 ± 1.04 (p < 0.01). For BII, Google's average score was 2.66 ± 1.24, while ChatGPT scored an average of 4.28 ± 0.97 (p < 0.01). The superiority of ChatGPT's responses was attributed to their comprehensive nature and recognition of existing knowledge gaps. However, some of ChatGPT's answers had inaccessible sources. CONCLUSION: ChatGPT outperforms Google in providing high-quality answers to commonly asked questions on BIA-ALCL and BII, highlighting the potential of AI technologies in patient education. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, comparative study LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .


Asunto(s)
Implantación de Mama , Implantes de Mama , Neoplasias de la Mama , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes , Cirujanos , Humanos , Femenino , Implantes de Mama/efectos adversos , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/epidemiología , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/etiología , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/patología , Motor de Búsqueda , Implantación de Mama/efectos adversos , Fuentes de Información , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/etiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía
10.
Ann Plast Surg ; 92(1): 34-40, 2024 Jan 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37994417

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Financial toxicity is a growing concern due to its considerable effects on medical adherence, quality of life, and mortality. The cost associated with breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is substantial from diagnosis to treatment, including adjuvant therapy and surgery. This study aims to assess the prevalence of financial toxicity in BIA-ALCL patients. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional, survey-based study on women with confirmed cases of BIA-ALCL from December 2019 to March 2023. The primary study outcomes were financial toxicity measured by Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST) score and patient-reported financial burden measured by the responses to the Evaluation of the Financial Impact of BIA-ALCL survey. Lower COST scores signify higher financial toxicity. Responses were linked to patient data extracted from the medical records. RESULTS: Thirty-two women treated for confirmed BIA-ALCL were included. Patients were all White and were diagnosed at a median age of 51 years (range, 41-65 years). The mean COST score was 27.9 ± 2.23. Lower COST scores were associated with receipt of radiotherapy ( P = 0.033), exceeding credit card limits ( P = 0.036), living paycheck to paycheck ( P = 0.00027), requiring financial support from friends and family ( P = 0.00044), and instability in household finances ( P = 0.034). CONCLUSIONS: Financial toxicity is prevalent in BIA-ALCL patients and has a substantial impact on patient reported burden. Insurance denial is frequent for patients with a prior history of cosmetic augmentation. Risk assessments and cost discussions should occur throughout the care continuum to minimize financial burden.


Asunto(s)
Implantación de Mama , Implantes de Mama , Neoplasias de la Mama , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes , Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Implantes de Mama/efectos adversos , Estrés Financiero , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/epidemiología , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/etiología , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/terapia , Estudios Transversales , Calidad de Vida , Implantación de Mama/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Mama/etiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía
11.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 31(3): 2032-2040, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38102324

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is a subtype of ALCL that arises as a seroma or a mass in the capsule surrounding textured breast implants. However, collections of cases usually come from large groups of institutions or countries, with different approaches regarding surgery and treatment. Here we describe a cohort of 18 cases undergoing implant removal and capsulectomy followed at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed all the cases of women with breast implants undergoing implant removal and capsulectomy for BIA-ALCL at MSKCC from January 2011 to June 2020. RESULTS: Median age at diagnosis was 57 (range 35-77) years following a median implant exposure of 11 (range 7-33) years. All known implants were macrotextured with the proprietary Biocell macrotexturing pattern from salt-loss technique. A total of 16 patients (89%) had implants placed for breast cancer reconstruction. Patients presented with clinically evident effusion in 78% of cases and a mass in 17% of cases, and 83% of patients presented with stage 1 BIA-ALCL. Patients were followed for a median of 43.4 months (SD 45 months) after diagnosis. There were no cases of recurrent ALCL. All patients remain disease free and no patients died of ALCL. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of patients with BIA-ALCL surgically treated and followed at a single institution, we confirm the importance of adequate surgery (bilateral implant removal and complete capsulectomy) in patients presenting with seroma-confined disease. This dataset reinforces high rates of progression-free and overall survival when diagnosis is identified and treatment performed in those with limited-stage disease.


Asunto(s)
Implantación de Mama , Implantes de Mama , Neoplasias de la Mama , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes , Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Implantes de Mama/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/etiología , Seroma/etiología , Implantación de Mama/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía
12.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 102(48): e36231, 2023 Dec 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38050280

RESUMEN

RATIONALE: Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is rare, but its incidence has recently increased. It is characterized by a sudden onset of seroma collection after implantation of textured breast implants. However, BIA-ALCL may be confused with late hematoma, which is also a rare finding in aesthetic breast surgery. The cause of late hematoma is mostly unknown, and patients rarely present with specific symptoms. PATIENT CONCERNS: We presented a case of late hematoma that occurred in a patient who underwent augmentation mammoplasty 25 years ago and was on anticoagulants for 7 years. DIAGNOSES: Ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging could not rule out the possibility of BIA-ALCL. INTERVENTIONS: Bilateral implant removal was performed, and massive amounts of late hematoma and organizing tissues were removed. OUTCOMES: The pathologists confirmed the biopsy results as late hematoma with organizing tissues. Capsules from both sides were confirmed as fibrous capsules with chronic inflammation and foamy macrophage infiltration. LESSONS: Although malignancy needs to be primarily ruled out, late hematoma can occur beyond expectations, especially in anticoagulated patients, and must be included in the differential diagnosis.


Asunto(s)
Implantación de Mama , Implantes de Mama , Neoplasias de la Mama , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes , Mamoplastia , Humanos , Femenino , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/diagnóstico , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/etiología , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/patología , Mamoplastia/efectos adversos , Implantes de Mama/efectos adversos , Implantación de Mama/efectos adversos , Implantación de Mama/métodos , Mastectomía/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Mama/complicaciones
13.
Nagoya J Med Sci ; 85(4): 852-856, 2023 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38155618

RESUMEN

Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) has been regarded as a long-term problem after silicone breast implantations. We report a case in which BIA-ALCL and breast cancer were not detected preoperatively, with subsequent removal of a ruptured breast implant. A 52-year-old woman had silicone breast implants on both sides for breast augmentation 15 years ago. Right axillary lymphadenopathy and intracapsular ruptures were noted by magnetic resonance imaging. Right axillary lymph node biopsy was performed at our department of breast surgery. Flow cytometry for BIA-ALCL was also performed using the exudate around the implant. The results were negative for breast cancer and BIA-ALCL. However, taking into consideration exacerbation of breast implant rupture and the patient's anxiety about BIA-ALCL, ruptured bilateral implants were removed by total capsulectomy. The postoperative course was uneventful 1 year after the operation, and her anxiety was dispelled despite her breast deformity. Appropriate explantation and periodic examination may be required to prevent excessive anxiety.


Asunto(s)
Implantación de Mama , Implantes de Mama , Neoplasias de la Mama , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes , Mamoplastia , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Implantes de Mama/efectos adversos , Implantación de Mama/efectos adversos , Implantación de Mama/métodos , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/etiología , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/cirugía , Mamoplastia/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Ansiedad/etiología , Siliconas
14.
Ann Plast Surg ; 91(5): 529-533, 2023 11 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37823619

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We performed an assessment of patient response rates and clinical outcomes to the global recall for textured breast implants and to our institution's letters informing them of their risk of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL). METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who had textured implants placed at our institution was completed. Outcome measures included patient response rates to either the global recall or our institution's letters, rate of textured implant removal, and type of subsequent revision surgery. RESULTS: A total of 1176 patients with textured implants were reviewed for this study. In total, 374 patients (31.8%) reached out to discuss their risk of BIA-ALCL, and 297 (25.3%) eventually presented to the clinic. One hundred twenty eight patients (34.2%) responded after the letter but before the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ban of macrotextured BIOCELL implants, 186 (49.7%) after the FDA ban, and 48 (12.8%) after the manufacturer's multichannel campaign. One hundred eighteen patients with textured implants (11.6%) proceeded with surgery. Most underwent exchange with smooth implants (76 patients [64.4%]) after textured implant removal. CONCLUSIONS: A significant portion of patients (31.8%) responded to our letters, the FDA ban, and the manufacturer's campaign. Despite the low incidence of BIA-ALCL and the ongoing recommendation for observation in the setting of no symptoms, 11.6% of our patients still elected to proceed with implant removal. Exchange to smooth implants was the most popular surgical option at 64.4%.


Asunto(s)
Implantación de Mama , Implantes de Mama , Neoplasias de la Mama , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes , Humanos , Femenino , Implantes de Mama/efectos adversos , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/epidemiología , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/etiología , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/diagnóstico , Implantación de Mama/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Remoción de Dispositivos/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Mama/complicaciones
15.
Acta Biomater ; 171: 378-391, 2023 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37683967

RESUMEN

Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) occurs in the capsule surrounding breast implants. Malignant transformation of T cells by bacteria-driven chronic inflammation may be underlying BIA-ALCL mechanism. Here, we covalently grafted 2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine (MPC)-based polymers on a silicone surface and examined its effects against BIA-ALCL pathogenesis. MPC grafting strongly inhibited the adhesion of bacteria and bacteria-causing inflammation. Additionally, cancer T cell proliferation and capsule-derived fibroblast-cancer cell communication were effectively inhibited by MPC grafting. We further demonstrated the effect of MPC against the immune responses causing BIA-ALCL around human silicone implants in micro-pigs. Finally, we generated a xenograft anaplastic T cell lymphoma mouse model around the silicone implants and demonstrated that MPC grafting could effectively inhibit the lymphoma progression. This study is the first to show that bacteria-driven induction and progression of BIA-ALCL can be effectively inhibited by surface modification of implants. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is a major concern in the field of plastic and reconstructive surgery. In this study, we demonstrate strong inhibitory effect of zwitterionic polymer grafting on BIA-ALCL pathogenesis and progression, induced by bacterial infection and inflammation, both in vitro and in vivo. This study provides a molecular basis for the development of novel breast implants that can prevent various potential complications such as excessive capsular contracture, breast implant illness, and BIA-ALCL incidence, as well as for expanding the biomedical applications of zwitterionic polymers.


Asunto(s)
Implantes de Mama , Neoplasias de la Mama , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes , Humanos , Animales , Ratones , Porcinos , Femenino , Implantes de Mama/efectos adversos , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/etiología , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/epidemiología , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/patología , Bacterias , Inflamación , Siliconas
17.
Aesthet Surg J ; 44(1): NP32-NP40, 2023 Dec 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37616552

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although textured implants represent fewer than 10% of implants used in the United States, the country reports the highest incidence of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL). OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to perform a systematic literature review on US-based epidemiology to update knowledge on BIA-ALCL in the United States. METHODS: Publications on US BIA-ALCL epidemiology were searched between September 2022 and March 2023 on MEDLINE (National Institutes of Health; Bethesda, MD), Embase (Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands), Web of Science (Clarivate, London, UK), and SCOPUS (Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands). The US numerator was obtained by averaging the FDA MAUDE database and the PSF PROFILE registry, while the denominator was estimated from chest X-rays, and included female transgender individuals. Prevalence and risk were assessed accordingly, but the incidence rate (IR) could not be updated due to the lack of available follow-up data. RESULTS: Out of 987 identified manuscripts, 10 were included. The US prevalence of BIA-ALCL in the literature ranged from 1:300 to 1:500,000 and the IR from 4.5 per 10,000 to 31.1 per 100 million persons per year. A mean value of 453.5 BIA-ALCL cases was calculated. From a denominator of 4,264,618 individuals, which includes all breast implant surfaces, we calculated 414,521 individuals with textured implants, indicating a textured prevalence of 109.4 cases per 100,000 individuals and a risk of 1:913. CONCLUSIONS: BIA-ALCL IR, prevalence, and risk has increased when calculated exclusively for patients with textured devices. Although US macrotextured implants were recalled by the FDA, these findings may influence the surveillance of existing patients and the use of macrotextured implants in other parts of the world where they remain widespread.


Asunto(s)
Implantación de Mama , Implantes de Mama , Neoplasias de la Mama , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes , Humanos , Femenino , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Implantes de Mama/efectos adversos , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/epidemiología , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/etiología , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/patología , Implantación de Mama/efectos adversos , Incidencia , Países Bajos , Neoplasias de la Mama/etiología
18.
Am J Hematol ; 98(11): E312-E314, 2023 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37646570

RESUMEN

More than 1300 women with breast implants have developed an anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) in fluid (seroma) around their implant. More often, seromas are due to benign causes, for example, capsule contracture, leakage, or trauma. Our report in American Journal of Hematology identified several cytokines (IL-9, IL-10, IL-13) as significantly elevated only in seromas due to ALCL. We further showed that the most robust biomarker, IL-10, could be detected by a lateral flow assay (similar to COVID detection) within minutes allowing physicians to quickly plan management, eliminate or reduce costly testing and patient time away from family. Early detection of ALCL in seromas before infiltration may avoid need for cytotoxic or immunotherapy and is possibly life-saving.


Asunto(s)
Implantes de Mama , Neoplasias de la Mama , COVID-19 , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes , Femenino , Humanos , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/diagnóstico , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/etiología , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/patología , Implantes de Mama/efectos adversos , Interleucina-10 , Seroma/diagnóstico , Seroma/etiología , Seroma/patología , Citocinas , COVID-19/complicaciones , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Mama/complicaciones , Prueba de COVID-19
20.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 30(10): 6170-6175, 2023 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37454017

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is an uncommon type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, associated with breast implant capsules. Despite improvements in our understanding of BIA-ALCL, communicating the prognosis to patients remains challenging due to limited long-term follow-up data. This has important implications for decision-making, including recommendations for subsequent reconstructive procedures. The aim of this study was to assess the longer-term oncological outcomes of patients receiving multidisciplinary treatment for BIA-ALCL. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of BIA-ALCL patients treated at a tertiary referral unit. The data are presented using simple descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Between 2015 and 2022, 18 BIA-ALCL patients were treated at our institution. The median age at diagnosis was 48.5 (IQR 41-55) years. Ten patients developed BIA-ALCL after cosmetic breast augmentation, and 8 after breast reconstruction following mastectomy for cancer. All patients had a history of textured implant insertion. The median time from first implant surgery to diagnosis was 8.5 (IQR 7-12) years. All patients underwent en-bloc total capsulectomy with implant removal, and 2 received systemic therapy. Fifteen patients had Stage I (IA-IC) disease, 2 had Stage IIA and 1 Stage III BIA-ALCL, based on the TNM classification system. At a median follow-up of 45 (IQR 15-71) months, there were no episodes of local or systemic relapse or death. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical management for BIA-ALCL is sufficient in early-stage disease, and associated with excellent oncological outcomes. This information is reassuring for patients when discussing recurrence risk.


Asunto(s)
Implantación de Mama , Implantes de Mama , Neoplasias de la Mama , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes , Humanos , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Implantes de Mama/efectos adversos , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/etiología , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias de la Mama/etiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Mastectomía/métodos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/etiología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/cirugía , Implantación de Mama/efectos adversos , Implantación de Mama/métodos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...