Oncology outcomes in Retroperitoneal sarcomas: Prognostic factors in a Retrospective Cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Retroperitoneal sarcomas are a rare group of malignant soft tissue tumors with a generally poor prognosis. The aim of the study was to define the demographic characteristics and prognostic factors for patients with retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) in a Tertiary Referral Center at Mexico. METHODS: A retrospective study of patients with RPS treated from January 2005 to December 2012 at the National Cancer Institute at Mexico. Patient, tumor and treatment variables were analyzed including use of adjuvant therapy and survival status. Survival and local recurrence curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Ninety-five patients with a mean age of 47 years with retroperitoneal sarcoma were included. Median follow-up was 25 months (range 1-108 months). The average tumor size was 23.7 cm. Histology, 58 (61.1%) were liposarcoma, 14 (14.7%), leiomyosarcomas and 23 (24.2%) were from other histologies. In 64 (67.4%) patients were high-grade malignancies. The median survival was 51 months for patients with complete resection, 25.1 months for those with incomplete resection, and 4.4 months for those with unresectable tumors. Complete resection (p = 0.0001), and liposarcoma (p = 0.03) were prognostic factors for overall survival. CONCLUSION: In this study of patients with retroperitoneal, complete resection and liposarcoma histology are prognostic factors related to the disease-free and overall survival. Patients approached with curative intent should undergo aggressive attempts at complete surgical resection.

Serum albumin is an independent prognostic factor for survival in soft tissue sarcomas.

BACKGROUND: Soft tissue sarcomas are rare tumors with a wide clinical spectrum. Prognostic factors for survival have been identified, but they have been focused in the characteristics of the tumor. Patient related variables have not usually been considered in previous analysis. METHODS: We analyzed a group of 61 patients with soft tissue sarcomas. Tumor related variables and patient related ones were recorded. Overall and disease free survival were calculated according to the Kaplan and Meier method. Prognostic factors for survival were determined by the log-rank method for univariate analysis and the Cox method for multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Clinical and demographic characteristics are comparable to those of previous reports. Adverse prognostic factors for overall survival in multivariate analysis were advanced stage, high tumor grade, irresecability, and serum albumin. Size, high surgical risk (ASA III-IV) and a low performance status (Karnofsky less than 70) were predictive of overall survival only in univariate analysis. For disease free survival, only high tumor grade had statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Besides the usual tumor related prognostic factors, such as grade and stage, patient related factors, such as performance status and surgical risk should be considered when predicting survival. Specifically, serum albumin was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival.

Prognostic factors and expression of MDM2 in patients with primary extremity liposarcoma.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate MDM2 (murine double minute 2) protein expression and evaluate its relationship with some anatomical and pathological aspects, aiming also to identify prognostic factors concerning local recurrence-free survival, metastasis-free survival and overall survival in patients with primary liposarcomas of the extremities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 50 patients with primary liposarcomas of the extremities admitted to a Reference Service, between 1968 and 2004, 25 were enrolled in the study, following eligibility and exclusion criteria. RESULTS: The adverse factors that influenced the risk for local recurrence in the univariant analysis included male sex (P = 0.023), pleomorphic histological subtype (P = 0.027), and high histological grade (P = 0.007). Concerning metastasis-free survival, age less than 50 years (P = 0.040), male sex (P = 0.040), pleomorphic subtype (P < 0.001), and high histological grade (P = 0.003) had a worse prognosis. Adverse factors for overall survival were age under 50 years (P = 0.040), male sex (P = 0.040), pleomorphic subtype (P < 0.001), and high histological grade (P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: There was no correlation between immunohistochemically observed MDM2 protein expressions and the anatomical and pathological variables studied. The immunohistochemical expression of MDM2 protein was not considered to have a prognostic value for any of the surviving patients in this study (local recurrence-free survival, metastasis-free survival, or overall survival). The immunoexpression of MDM2 protein was a frequent event in the different subtypes of liposarcomas.

Prognostic factors and expression of MDM2 in patients with primary extremity liposarcoma

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate MDM2 (murine double minute 2) protein expression and evaluate its relationship with some anatomical and pathological aspects, aiming also to identify prognostic factors concerning local recurrence-free survival, metastasis-free survival and overall survival in patients with primary liposarcomas of the extremities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 50 patients with primary liposarcomas of the extremities admitted to a Reference Service, between 1968 and 2004, 25 were enrolled in the study, following eligibility and exclusion criteria. RESULTS: The adverse factors that influenced the risk for local recurrence in the univariant analysis included male sex (P = 0.023), pleomorphic histological subtype (P = 0.027), and high histological grade (P = 0.007). Concerning metastasis-free survival, age less than 50 years (P = 0.040), male sex (P = 0.040), pleomorphic subtype (P < 0.001), and high histological grade (P = 0.003) had a worse prognosis. Adverse factors for overall survival were age under 50 years (P = 0.040), male sex (P = 0.040), pleomorphic subtype (P < 0.001), and high histological grade (P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: There was no correlation between immunohistochemically observed MDM2 protein expressions and the anatomical and pathological variables studied. The immunohistochemical expression of MDM2 protein was not considered to have a prognostic value for any of the surviving patients in this study (local recurrence-free survival, metastasis-free survival, or overall survival). The immunoexpression of MDM2 protein was a frequent event in the different subtypes of liposarcomas.

Sarcomas de partes blandas: análisis de su comportamiento / Soft tissue sarcomas: analysis of its behaviour

Se estudian 200 casos de sarcomas de partes blandas que abarcan las variedades histológicas más frecuentes inscriptas en el Instituto Nacional de Oncología y Radiobiología durante los años 1963 a 1972 conjuntamente con la información obtenida por el Registro Nacional del Cáncer acerca de estos tumores y los trabajos publicados por nuestro centro desde 1963 a 1983 para analizar el comportamiento de esta enfermedad, y llegar a la conclusión de que los tumores malignos de las partes blandas son lesiones que se observan con relativa poca frecuencia, pero su incidencia y mortalidad han tenido tendencia a elevarse constantemente en los últimos años. La enfermedad se observa en todas las edades de preferencia por encima de los 30 años, y predomina en el sexo masculino, y son los tipos histológicos fundamentales: fibrosarcoma, liposarcoma y rabdomiosarcoma. Los miembros inferiores ocupan el primer lugar en cuanto a localización, pero la enfermedad está muy estrechamente relacionada con la Histología. El sinoviosarcoma y el neurofibrosarcoma se comportan como las lesiones más agresivas por su alto poder de metastización y su elevado índice de metástasis pulmonares y ganglionares. El tratamiento más adecuado es el que contempla el empleo de las armas terapéuticas fundamentales: Cirugía, radiaciones y poliquimioterapia como un todo sincrónico, ajustable, donde se aplica cada una de ellas en el momento requerido. La supervivencia global de 5 años fue del 39%, que está en dependencia con la extensión y localización de la lesión, la edad de presentación, el tipo histológico, el grado de diferenciación tumoral y el tratamiento empleado, como factores fundamentales