Uroseptic Shock Can Be Reversed by Early Intervention Based on Leukocyte Count 2 h Post-operation: Animal Model and Multicenter Clinical Cohort Study.

This study investigated whether early intervention based on leukocyte count (WBC) of less than 2.85 × 109/L obtained within 2 h post-operatively may ameliorate the uroseptic shock induced by upper urinary tract endoscopic lithotripsy (UUTEL). Urosepsis was induced in 30 rabbits and assigned to three groups: Control-I, WBC-I, and Shock-I. Control-I: Non-intervention control. WBC-I: Immediate resuscitation when there was a drastic drop of WBC within 2 h post-operatively but without signs or symptoms of shock. Shock-I: Resuscitation only when there were signs or symptoms of shock. In total, 107 patients whose WBC were less than 2.85 × 109/L within 2 h after UUTEL were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were assigned into two groups based on the time of the intervention. Shock-II included 59 patients who were started on the resuscitation bundle when there were signs or symptoms of shock. WBC-II included 48 patients who were started immediately on the resuscitation bundle when the WBC decreased drastically. All Control-I rabbits developed shock within 72 h and died. None of the WBC-I rabbits developed shock and all survived for 72 h. In total, 60% of Shock-I died within 72 h. Overall, 43 patients in Shock-II and six patients in WBC-II experienced uroseptic shock. The average lengths of hospitalization for Shock-II and WBC-II were 17.8 ± 9.7 days and 7 ± 4.2 days, respectively. Six patients in the Shock-II and none in WBC-II died of the uroseptic shock. Early intervention based on WBC measured within 2 h post-operatively might avert the uroseptic shock induced by UUTEL.

Effect of Amplatz Sheath on Cystolithotripsy for Women with Large Bladder Stone.

OBJECTIVE: This study compared the effect of endourological procedures with or without the Amplatz sheath (AS) on cystolithotripsy. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed 18 patients who underwent treatment for bladder stone over 30 mm. This study consisted of two groups, namely, patients who underwent cystolithotripsy with an AS (AS group) and those who underwent standard procedure without an AS (SP group). The stone-free rate, total energy used for operation, operation time, days of admission after operation, and complication of both groups were compared. RESULTS: The number of patients in the AS and SP groups was 10 and 8, respectively. Significant differences were not found between these two groups with regard to age, stone burden, stone volume, number of stones, and history of neurogenic bladder. All patients in both groups achieved a stone-free state. Total energy was significantly increased and operation time was shorter in the AS group. No significant difference was observed in terms of days of admission after operation. Any complications were not increased by the use of AS. Struvite was the most common stone component in both groups. CONCLUSION: Use of an AS can shorten the operation time of cystolithotripsy without increasing perioperative complication.

Long-term follow-up after treatment of common bile duct stones by extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The efficacy of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) of difficult bile duct stones that were not amenable to routine endoscopic extraction was assessed, with evaluation of the long-term follow-up after successful treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-four patients (mean age 74 years, range 33-92) were treated with ESWL for difficult bile duct stones. Treatment was performed either with the Dornier HM3 kidney lithotriptor (49 patients) or with the MPL 9000 lithotriptor (five patients). RESULTS: Stone disintegration was achieved in 50 patients (93%), with complete stone clearance in 45 patients (83%) (mean 1.2 session). Patients with successful stone removal after one session had significantly smaller stones than patients with treatment failure (20 +/- 9 versus 27 +/- 8 mm; p < 0.05). An intrahepatic location of stones was significantly associated with treatment failure (p < 0.005). Serve complications occurred in 7% (procedure-related 5%), with a 30-day mortality rate of 0% (in-hospital mortality rate of 2%). Minor side effects such as fever, petechiae, and mild arrhythmias were frequent (37%), and microhematuria (95%) occurred in nearly all of the patients. Symptomatic recurrent bile duct stones were observed in two patients (5%) after three and four years, respectively (mean follow-up 5.3 years). CONCLUSION: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy represents a safe and effective treatment modality for difficult bile duct stones, with a low rate of symptomatic recurrences.

Percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopy and electrohydraulic lithotripsy for bile duct stones.

Percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopy in combination with intracorporeal electrohydraulic lithotripsy was successfully applied in 3 patients with biliary tract stones which could not be removed by endoscopic techniques. In a fourth patient, cholangioscopy was used as a diagnostic tool for the evaluation of a right hepatic duct stenosis above a hepatico-jejunostomy. The percutaneous transhepatic tract was dilated up to an 18-French size over a period of 1 week. Maturation of the tract was then awaited for another week before cholangioscopic procedures were started. The only complication noticed consisted of haemobilia that occurred in 1 patient after introduction of the initial percutaneous external-internal drainage catheter. Percutaneous cholangioscopy is a promising new technique in our diagnostic and therapeutic strategy in patients with complex biliary tract disorders.