Leveraging the power of new molecular technologies in the clinical setting requires unprecedented awareness of limitations and drawbacks: experience of one diagnostic laboratory.

BACKGROUND: Advances in molecular technologies and in-silico variant prediction tools offer wide-ranging opportunities in diagnostic settings, yet they also present with significant limitations. OBJECTIVE: Here, we contextualise the limitations of next-generation sequencing (NGS), multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) and in-silico prediction tools routinely used by diagnostic laboratories by reviewing specific experiences from our diagnostic laboratory. METHODS: We investigated discordant annotations and/or incorrect variant 'callings' in exons of 56 genes constituting our cardiomyopathy and connective tissue disorder NGS panels. Discordant variants and segmental duplications (SD) were queried using the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Basic Local Alignment Search Tool and the University of California Santa Cruz genome browser, respectively, to identify regions of high homology. Discrepant variant analyses by in-silico models were re-evaluated using updated file entries. RESULTS: We observed a 5% error rate in MYH7 variant 'calling' using MLPA, which resulted from >90% homology of the MYH7 probe-binding site to MYH6. SDs were detected in TTN, PKP2 and MYLK. SDs in MYLK presented the highest risk (15.7%) of incorrect variant 'calling'. The inaccurate 'callings' and discrepant in-silico predictions were resolved following detailed investigation into the source of error. CONCLUSION: Recognising the limitations described here may help avoid incorrect diagnoses and leverage the power of new molecular technologies in diagnostic settings.

Una etapa apasionante / An exciting step

No disponible

Real-world data in the molecular era-finding the reality in the real world.

Real-world data (RWD) promises to provide a pivotal element to the understanding of personalized medicine. However, without true representation (or the reality) of the patient-disease biosystem and its molecular contributors, RWD may hamper rather than help this advancement. In this review article, we discuss RWD vs. clinical reality and the disconnects that exist currently (emphasizing molecular medicine), and methods of closing the gaps between RWD and reality.

Ensuring Sample Quality for Biomarker Discovery Studies - Use of ICT Tools to Trace Biosample Life-cycle.

The growing demand of personalized medicine marked the transition from an empirical medicine to a molecular one, aimed at predicting safer and more effective medical treatment for every patient, while minimizing adverse effects. This passage has emphasized the importance of biomarker discovery studies, and has led sample availability to assume a crucial role in biomedical research. Accordingly, a great interest in Biological Bank science has grown concomitantly. In biobanks, biological material and its accompanying data are collected, handled and stored in accordance with standard operating procedures (SOPs) and existing legislation. Sample quality is ensured by adherence to SOPs and sample whole life-cycle can be recorded by innovative tracking systems employing information technology (IT) tools for monitoring storage conditions and characterization of vast amount of data. All the above will ensure proper sample exchangeability among research facilities and will represent the starting point of all future personalized medicine-based clinical trials.

Biospecimens, biomarkers, and burgeoning data: the imperative for more rigorous research standards.

Knowledge of the altered molecular landscapes in disease offers great promise for developing biomarker-based tests to improve diagnosis and optimize treatment. Progress in biomarker research has been frustratingly slow due to the poor clinical trial design and the lack of standards for specimen collection, biomarker analysis, and data reporting. The ability of high throughput genomics, proteomics, and other 'omics' platforms to profile a large number of analytes in a single assay, together with the pending prospect of rapid expansion of whole exome and whole genome sequencing for clinical use, is increasing the technical and logistical complexity of biomarker validation. Harnessing these new technologies and improved productivity in biomarker validation will depend on adopting systems-based approaches and require major changes in the organization and funding strategies for biomarker research. A systems approach will require new multi-institution collaborations, the integration of diverse technical and clinical activities, greater engagement of industry, and education of regulators, clinicians, and payers about how to use biomarkers for improved patient management and clinical outcomes.