Travel medicine in Basel - 450 years before CISTM18.

Concern for travellers' wellbeing and safety is as old as humankind. Historic documents offer insights into how a safe journey was prepared or travel ailments treated based on the prevailing knowledge of body and (dys)function. In 1561, Guilhelmo Gratarolo published a comprehensive book on what we call today 'travel medicine'. Many then problems are still today's travel malaises. How they were dealt with 450 years ago is uncovered in his fascinating publication.

Characteristics of Polish travellers admitted at the University Centre of Maritime and Tropical Medicine in Poland, 2023.

BACKGROUND: After COVID-19 restrictions were lifted, people started to travel again. Each year, thousands of Poles travel internationally, and many travel to tropical or subtropical destinations in Asia, Africa or South America. The aim of this article was to describe the characteristics of Polish travellers based on the information from a retrospective 12-month review of the medical records of Polish patients seeking pre-travel advice at the largest diagnostic and treatment travel medicine centre in Poland in 2023. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The retrospective study was based on the analysis of medical records of 2,147 patients seeking pre-travel advice at the University Centre of Maritime and Tropical Medicine in Gdynia, Poland, between January and December 2023. The study focused on the analysis of the following patients' variables: age, sex, travel details (purpose of travel, length of travel, departure month, continents and countries to be visited). It also aimed to evaluate the range of prevention measures which were either recommended or administered to patients seeking pre-travel advice at the clinic (preventive vaccinations, chemoprophylaxis). In addition, it assessed the health status of the patients presenting at the travel medicine clinic; retrospective health assessments were based on the information from the interviews with the patients. RESULTS: Patients who sought pre-travel advice were mostly aged 36-65 years (49.5%), they were travelling for tourism purposes (78.3%), for a maximum period of 4 weeks (79.0%), mostly in November (15.2%) or in January (14.9%). Most travellers planned to visit Asia (55.5%) or Africa (29.0%); mainly Thailand (21.5%), Vietnam (8.5%), Kenya (8.3%) or India (8.2%). The most frequently administered immunoprophylaxis included vaccinations against typhoid fever and hepatitis A. Other commonly recommended/prescribed prevention measures included: insect repellents (69.3%), sunscreen (58.3%), antimalarials (35.8%), antithrombotic drugs (32.6%), and antidiarrheal drugs (25.6%). The analysis of patient interviews demonstrated that 61.8% of the travellers consulted at the clinic had no pre-existing medical conditions, while 38.2% required the use of chronic medications, mainly for allergies (14.3%), thyroid disorders (13.6%), cardiovascular diseases (9.3%), or psychiatric disorders (5.5%). CONCLUSIONS: A large number of Polish travellers visit destinations where the risk of infectious and non-infectious diseases is high. Providing patients with professional advice during a pre-travel consultation will help protect against travel-associated health problems.

The provision of sexual and reproductive health information and services to travellers: an exploratory survey of Australian travel medicine clinicians.

BACKGROUND: International travel can increase the risk of exposure to infectious diseases including sexually transmissible infections (STI). Pre-travel medical consultation provides an opportunity for travel-related health risk assessments and advice. This study explored how travel medicine clinicians integrate sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services into clinical practice. METHODS: A convenience sample of travel medicine clinicians completed a cross-sectional survey online or via hard-copy disseminated at an annual national Australian travel medicine conference. RESULTS: Of the 67 respondents, most (n , 51; 76.1%) had a postgraduate qualification relevant to travel medicine and 55.2% (n , 37) had worked in travel medicine for over 10years. Only 22.4% (n , 15) reported conducting a SRH history/STI risk assessment for all travel patients. STI testing pre-departure was conducted on patient request (48, 71.6%), if symptomatic (32, 47.8%) or based on risk history (28, 41.8%). SRH information pre-departure was most frequently provided if prompted by patient questions (n , 42; 62.7%), or based on the patient's history (n , 37; 55.2%). Over half the sample (n , 40; 59.7%) expressed interest in further training in SRH. CONCLUSION: Providing and engaging with additional training may assist travel medicine clinicians to take a more proactive approach to SRH consultations and STI testing. Additional research is needed to explore models of care that will allow comprehensive SRH and STI services to be integrated into standard pre- and post-travel care.

Psychological and Social Aspects of Vaccination Hesitancy-Implications for Travel Medicine in the Aftermath of the COVID-19 Crisis: A Narrative Review.

Vaccines are an important tool of preventive medicine. Although organized vaccination programs have saved large populations from serious infectious diseases, there is a considerable part of the population who oppose vaccinations. In particular, anti-vaccination perceptions, among travelers to countries with endemic diseases, are a major public health concern. Although hesitancy towards vaccinations is not a novel phenomenon, it came back to the forefront during the fight against the COVID-19 pandemic. This review explores the etiology of anti-vaccination beliefs among travelers and draws conclusions about their impact on public health and society in general. For this purpose, a purposeful search for data on the causative factors of vaccine hesitancy and their impact on people's health was conducted. A descriptive analysis of the findings and conclusions regarding possible implications in health policy and clinical practice are presented. A fear of side effects, lack of credence in the necessity of vaccines, and mistrust of medical authorities are important causative factors. Their interplay shapes hesitancy towards vaccines. However, anti-vaccination beliefs can also be an aspect of a more general unconventional stance of life. Health care professionals and organizations must be ready to tackle vaccine hesitancy by making the necessary interventions. Correcting misconceptions about vaccinations is a prerequisite for ensuring personal and public health, especially in the context of a pandemic or epidemic. Moreover, ensuring the efficacy and safety of vaccines, especially in cases of modern technology applications, is a fundamental factor in addressing people's concerns about vaccines. For this purpose, medical authorities and organizations must provide accurate and clear information on vaccines so as to eliminate misinformation. Furthermore, clinicians should cultivate their communication skills in order to convey the appropriate messages to prospective recipients of vaccinations.

Travel Medicine: Pretravel Counseling for Healthy Travelers.

Before the COVID-19 pandemic, international travel was increasing at a brisk rate. After a lull, it is picking up again and predicted to continue to climb as it had previously. International travel presents some unique health hazards, including infectious diseases, chronic disease exacerbation, environment-related illness, accidental injuries, and transportation-related illness. Many travelers appropriately seek medical consultation for advice and interventions to decrease their health risks during travel. The pretravel consultation consists of risk identification and preventive interventions. Although these consultations traditionally have occurred with infectious disease specialists, family physicians can and should provide this care. Pretravel consultations should review a patient's medical conditions, how travel can affect them, and what the patient can do to address medical needs that may arise while abroad. Balancing the risks likely to be encountered with the individual traveler's risk tolerance, patients and family physicians can collaboratively develop a strategy to mitigate these risks and increase the likelihood of an uneventful (and enjoyable) sojourn.

Travel Medicine: Travelers With Preexisting Conditions.

Certain conditions (eg, asthma, diabetes, physical disability, immunocompromise, severe allergies, pregnancy) may increase the risk of travel, but do not necessarily preclude it. Typical age-related physiologic changes also can increase the chances of serious injury or illness. For example, infection with malaria can result in more severe parasitemia in HIV-positive, pregnant, or older travelers. Physicians should evaluate each traveler as an individual, assessing risk tolerance and helping patients decide if the benefits outweigh the definite and potential costs. Extremes of climate and altitude, changes in time zones, and unfamiliar foodstuffs should be given particular attention. The well-prepared traveler should explore options for supplemental insurance, obtain necessary medical records and supplies (including their regular drugs and an appropriate first aid kit), receive education on how to recognize and what to do in the event of a medical emergency, and understand where to find high-quality care abroad.

Travel Medicine: Illness While Traveling.

Becoming ill while traveling is an unfortunate but common event, with gastrointestinal, febrile, dermatologic, and respiratory symptoms predominating. However, many illnesses acquired abroad can be prevented or controlled with evidence-based preventive measures and judicious use of appropriate self-care and local medical care. It is important that travelers know how to use international medical care and are aware of available tools to help them identify appropriate medical care in another country. Discussion of evacuation insurance is a crucial part of the pretravel medical evaluation. Epidemiology, prevention, and management guidelines of common travel-related illnesses, such as travelers diarrhea and febrile illnesses, should be addressed. Traveler counseling regarding the early management of serious but underrecognized considerations, such as accident-related trauma, sexual health, and mental health, should be included in the pretravel assessment. Important aspects of appropriate counseling and management of the traveler returning from an extended visit abroad include addressing reverse culture shock and evaluating symptoms that could be part of a delayed presentation of an illness acquired abroad.

Travel Medicine: Special Issues.

Risks during travel depend on travelers' comorbidities and trip activities. Travel on cruise ships, for pilgrimages or large events, or into the wilderness carries unique risks. Asking travelers about what activities they have planned or may do during travel can tailor the subsequent pretravel counseling points and help guide decisions about vaccines and drugs. Some prescriptions (eg, doxycycline for prophylaxis against leptospirosis) depend on the planned activities while abroad. Travelers should be prepared for potential emergencies and should be encouraged to research unique customs and laws in the countries they plan to visit before departure. The US State Department's website has resources that Americans traveling abroad should be familiar with, including information about the laws and customs of the destination country. It is important that travelers investigate the different insurance options or coverages before a trip, in case emergencies arise.

Travel Medicine.

International travel can cause new illness or exacerbate existing conditions. Because primary care providers are frequent sources of health advice to travelers, they should be familiar with destination-specific disease risks, be knowledgeable about travel and routine vaccines, be prepared to prescribe chemoprophylaxis and self-treatment regimens, and be aware of travel medicine resources. Primary care providers should recognize travelers who would benefit from referral to a specialized travel clinic for evaluation. Those requiring yellow fever vaccination, immunocompromised hosts, pregnant persons, persons with multiple comorbid conditions, or travelers with complex itineraries may warrant specialty referral.

Pre-travel vaccine information needs, attitudes, drivers of uptake and the role for decision aids in travel medicine.

BACKGROUND: Many travellers do not receive vaccines pre-travel. Tools such as vaccine decision aids could support informed vaccine decision-making. We aimed to characterise Australians' pre-travel vaccine attitudes, behaviours and information needs and examine the role for decision aids in travel medicine. METHODS: Online cross-sectional survey of Australian adults in December 2022. We included questions on demographics, pre-travel health-seeking behaviour, and information needs. We measured vaccine confidence (Vaccine Confidence Index Index) and used hypothetical disease scenarios to evaluate behavioural and social drivers of vaccination. We used multivariable logistic regression models to identify predictors of vaccine uptake and thematically analysed free-text responses. RESULTS: We received complete survey responses from 1223/1326 Australians (92% response rate). Amongst those reporting previous overseas travel, 67% (778/1161) reported past pre-travel health encounter(s) and 64% (743/1161) reported past pre-travel vaccination. Half (50%) strongly agreed that vaccines were important for their health; fewer strongly agreed that vaccines were safe (37%) and effective (38%). In multivariable analyses, past pre-travel vaccine uptake was associated with increasing age (OR = 1.17 [95% CI 1.08-1.27] p < 0.001 per ten-year increase) and travel to higher-risk destinations (OR = 2.92 [2.17-3.93] p < 0.001); travellers visiting friends and relatives (VFRs) were less likely to have received pre-travel vaccines (OR = 0.74 [0.56-0.97] p = 0.028). Predictors for wanting vaccination against hypothetical diseases included past pre-travel vaccination (Disease X: OR 2.60 [1.91-3.56] p < 0.001) and confidence in vaccine safety (Disease X: OR 7.18 [5.07-10.18], p < 0.001); past VFR travel was predictive of not wanting vaccination (Disease X: OR 0.72 [0.52-1.00], p = 0.049). Most (63%) were interested in using a vaccine decision aid, generally together with a trusted health professional. CONCLUSIONS: Health professionals play an important role in supporting pre-travel vaccine decision-making. However, our findings indicate that reliable, accurate and engaging digital resources, such as decision aids, could support travellers to make informed pre-travel vaccine decisions.

Development and curricular alignment of a pharmacy travel medicine elective.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Describe the design, implementation, and value of a travel medicine pharmacy elective. Students translated skills from rotations and practice environments addressing travel health-related needs. Content and educational outcomes align with the Center for the Advancement of Pharmacy Education, American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy, and Pharmacists' Patient Care Process core components of student learning and assessment. EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY AND SETTING: A two-credit travel medicine elective included live and pre-recorded lectures, self-learning modules, peer critiques, and patient engagement. Students shadowed in a travel health clinic interacting with patients to prepare a formal travel care plan unique to the patient's history and travel destination. Pre- and post-course surveys, quizzes, progressive assignments, and course evaluations provided the framework for curricular enhancement. FINDINGS: A cohort of 32 third-year students provided evidence of successful curricular integration. Pre-course surveys demonstrated 87% of students self-scored low knowledge and ability to apply travel health services. Ninety percent of post-course surveys reported high levels of knowledge and ability. High perceived value was evident in course evaluations with some student intent to pursue credentialing. SUMMARY: Community practice affords increased opportunities to identify patients in need of travel medicine services. The unique approach and design supported successful integration of a travel medicine elective in the University of South Florida Taneja College of Pharmacy curriculum. Upon elective completion, students were prepared to educate internationally traveling patients to safely self-manage chronic health conditions, reduce potential health risks and harm exposures during travel, and monitor health changes upon return.

Factores asociados con malaria y arboviriasis en pacientes con síndrome febril importado: estudio de cohortes retrospectivo / Factors associated with malaria and arboviral disease in patients with imported febrile syndrome: a retrospective cohort study

Objetivos: Definir variables predictoras de malaria y arboviriasis en pacientes que consultan por síndrome febril tras la vuelta de un viaje a zonas tropicales/subtropicales. Método: Estudio de cohortes retrospectivo. Se incluyeron variables demográficas, epidemiológicas, clínicas, analíticas y el diagnóstico final clínico y microbiológico. Se realizó un análisis multivariante y se calcularon los índices de exactitud diagnóstica (sensibilidad, especificidad, valores predictivos) y cocientes de probabilidad de la combinación de dichas variables. Resultados: Se incluyeron 291 pacientes con síndrome febril, 108 tenían malaria (37,1%), 28 arboviriasis (9,6%) y 155 otras causas de fiebre (53,3%). En el análisis multivariante, los pacientes con síndrome febril con más riesgo de padecer malaria fueron los que procedían de África subsahariana [odds ratio ajustado (ORa): 45,85; IC 95%: 9,45-222,49], eran inmigrantes que visitan a familiares y amigos (VFA) (ORa = 3,55; IC 95%: 1,21-10,46), presentaban cifras de plaquetas < 150.000/mm3 (ORa = 16,47; IC 95%: 5,46-49,70) o cefalea (ORa = 10,62; IC 95%: 3,20-35,28). La combinación de estas cuatro variables tiene un cociente de probabilidad positivo (CPP) de 23,72 (IC 95%: 5,76-97,62). Los pacientes con síndrome febril que tienen más riesgo de padecer arboviriasis eran los que procedían de Centroamérica y Sudamérica (OR = 5,07; IC 95%: 1,73-14,92), presentaban exantema (OR = 5,10; IC 95%: 1,72-17,02) o artromialgias (OR = 14,50; IC 95%: 3,05-68,80). La combinación de estas tres variables tiene un CPP de 20,66 (IC 95%: 7,74-55,21). Conclusiones: Los pacientes con síndrome febril que tienen más riesgo de padecer malaria son los que procedían de África subsahariana, eran VFA, presentaban cifras de plaquetas < 150.000/μl o cefalea, y tenían mayor riesgo de padecer arboviriasis si procedían de Centroamérica y Sudamérica, presentaban exantema o artromialgias. (AU)

Objective: To identify predictors of malaria and arboviral disease in patients with febrile syndrome who seek care after traveling from tropical or subtropical locations. Methods: Observational retrospective cohort study. We collected demographic, epidemiologic, and clinical data; laboratory findings; and the clinical and final microbiologic diagnoses. Multivariate analysis was used to calculate indices of diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values) and coefficients of probability of combinations of variables. Results: Data for 291 patients with febrile syndrome were included; 108 had malaria (37.1%), 28 had an arboviral disease (9.6%), and 155 had other causes of fever (53.3%). Multivariate analysis showed patients most likely to have malaria were those from sub-Saharan Africa, adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 45.85 (95% CI, 9.45-222.49); immigrants who returned to visit friends and relatives (VFR), aOR of 3.55 (95% CI, 1.21-10.46); or had platelet concentrations <150 000/mm3, aORa of 16.47 (95% CI, 5.46-49.70) or headache, aOR of 10.62 (95% CI, 3.20-35.28). The combination of these 4 variables gave a positive probability coefficient (PPC) of 23.72 (95% CI, 5.76-97.62). Patients with febrile syndrome most likely to have an arboviral disease were those from Central or South America, OR 5.07 (95% CI, 1.73-14.92), and those who had exanthems, OR 5.10 (95% CI, 1.72-17.02) or joint pain, OR 14.50 (95% CI, 3.05-68.80). The combination of these 3 variables gave a PPC of 20.66 (95% CI, 7.74-55.21). Conclusions: Patients with febrile syndrome with the greatest probability of having malaria are those from sub-Saharan Africa, those who are VFR, and those with platelet concentrations under 150.000/μL or headache. Arboviral disease wasmore likely in patients from Central and South America who had exanthems or joint pain. (AU)