Timing of onset of menses after GnRH agonist treatment for central precocious puberty.

OBJECTIVES: To understand possible predictors of the onset of menses after gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist treatment cessation in girls with central precocious puberty (CPP). METHODS: This exploratory post hoc analysis of a phase 3 and 4 trial of girls with CPP treated with once-monthly intramuscular leuprolide acetate examined onset of menses after treatment completion using a time-to-event analysis. Pretreatment and end-of-treatment chronologic age (CA), bone age (BA)/CA ratio, and Tanner breast stage; pretreatment menses status; and end-of-treatment BA and body mass index (BMI) were studied as potential factors influencing the onset of menses. RESULTS: Median time to first menses after stopping treatment was 18.3 months among 35 girls (mean age at onset of treatment, 6.8 years) examined. Of 26 girls experiencing menses, 11 (42 %) menstruated at 16-21 months after stopping treatment. Most girls with pretreatment BA/CA≥1.4 started menstruating very close to 18 months after stopping treatment; those with less advanced BA/CA experienced menses at 9-18 months. End-of-treatment BA/CA≥1.2 was associated with a quicker onset of menses (14.5 vs. 18.5 months for BA/CA<1.2, p=0.006). End-of-treatment BA≥12 years predicted longer time to menses. No relationship with time to menses was observed for pretreatment menarche status, pretreatment or end-of-treatment Tanner breast stage (<3/≥3) or CA (<6/≥6 or ≤11/>11), or end-of-treatment BMI percentiles (<85.6/≥85.6 and <92.6/≥92.6). CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment menarche status or CA do not appear to predict onset of menses, but pre- and end-of-treatment BA/CA may be helpful in anticipating time to first menses after stopping treatment.

Bleeding profile and safety of a levonorgestrel 13.5 mg intrauterine device versus Nova T copper 380 mm2 intrauterine device: Results of a 3-year, single-center, randomized phase 4 study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the bleeding profiles of the levonorgestrel 13.5 mg intrauterine device (LNG13.5-IUD) and Nova T copper 380 mm2 IUD (Cu380-IUD). STUDY DESIGN: Single-center, evaluator-masked, randomized study conducted in women aged 18-45 years starting these methods. Primary outcomes were number of bleeding days, self-reported bleeding intensity, Pictorial Blood Assessment Chart (PBAC) score, and blood biochemical values at baseline, months 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 per 90-day reference periods except for PBAC (months). Secondary objectives were presence/duration/intensity of dysmenorrhea and tolerability. RESULTS: We included 106 women aged 32.5 ± 6.7 years: 55 with LNG13.5-IUD and 51 with Cu380-IUD. Data for LNG13.5-IUD versus Cu380-IUD at baseline and month 36 (both respectively) were as follows: (1) median (25th; 75th percentile) number of bleeding days: 12 (9.0; 15.0) versus 12 (9.0; 15.0), p = 0.82, and 4 (0; 13.7) versus 15 (14.2; 20.0), p < 0.001; (2) mean bleeding intensity: 1.7 for both, p = 0.66, and 0.7 and 2.2, p < 0.001. Forty percent versus 0% presented with amenorrhea at month 36; (3) mean PBAC score (95% Confidence interval (CI): 50.7 (16.6; 84.7) versus 130.4 (95.7; 165.0) at month 1, and 7.9 (-26.7; 42.6) versus 126 (90.7; 161.2), p < 0.001; (4) median (25th; 75th percentile) ferritin levels (Ug/L) 33 (19; 53) versus 30 (19; 45), p = 0.70, and 59 (42; 84) versus 21 (8; 39). We did not observe changes or differences between groups in hemoglobin and hematocrit. The duration and intensity of dysmenorrhea were significantly lower with LNG13.5-IUD versus Cu380-IUD. Adverse events were those expected. CONCLUSIONS: LNG13.5-IUD is associated with a significant reduction in blood loss and dysmenorrhea compared with Cu380-IUD. IMPLICATIONS: Women eligible for a levonorgestrel 13.5 mg intrauterine device (IUD) or a copper 380 mm2 IUD should be informed of the differences in bleeding profiles-one of the main causes for IUD discontinuation-so they can compare this information against their bleeding expectations.

Menstruación, un dolor invisibilizado / Menstruation, an invisible pain

Ovulación, ciclo menstrual, menopausia, cólicos menstruales, dismenorrea…Tan solo son algunas de las cientos de búsquedas que cada día se realizan en internet. Palabras clave que se ponen en el buscador con el objetivo de encontrar un porqué a los fuertes dolores que sufren muchas mujeres con la menstruación, dolores que se han normalizado y que son ignorados o infravalorados, pero que afectan a cinco de cada 10 mujeres. En concreto, casi la mitad de mujeres españolas ha padecido alguno de estos dolores, pero durante siglos la menstruación se ha silenciado y rechazado y muchas mujeres han vivido todo de puertas para dentro, desde la vergüenza y el desconocimiento. Desde que comenzó la pandemia ha aumentado el número de mujeres que aseguran que algo va mal en su ciclo menstrual y necesitan saber de qué se trata y que alguien les explique por qué sucede.(AU)

The effectiveness of desogestrel for endometrial protection in women with abnormal uterine bleeding-ovulatory dysfunction: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial.

Women with chronic abnormal uterine bleeding-ovulatory dysfunction (AUB-O) are at increased risk of endometrial neoplasia. We conducted a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial to determine the effectiveness of two cyclic-progestin regimens orally administered 10 d/month for 6 months on endometrial protection and menstruation normalization in women with AUB-O. There were 104 premenopausal women with AUB-O randomized to desogestrel (DSG 150 µg/d, n = 50) or medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA 10 mg/d, n = 54) group. Both groups were comparable in age (44.8 ± 5.7 vs. 42.5 ± 7.1 years), body mass index (24.8 ± 4.7 vs. 24.9 ± 4.7 kg/m2), and AUB characteristics (100% irregular periods). The primary outcome was endometrial response rate (the proportion of patients having complete pseudodecidualization in endometrial biopsies during treatment cycle-1). The secondary outcome was clinical response rate (the proportion of progestin withdrawal bleeding episodes with acceptable bleeding characteristics during treatment cycle-2 to cycle-6). DSG was not inferior to MPA regarding the endometrial protection (endometrial response rate of 78.0% vs. 70.4%, 95% CI of difference - 9.1-24.4%, non-inferiority limit of - 10%), but it was less effective regarding the menstruation normalization (acceptable bleeding rate of 90.0% vs 96.6%, P = 0.016).Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02103764, date of approval 18 Feb 2014).

Post-treatment anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) levels predict long-term ovarian dysfunction in women with hematological malignancies.

Fertility is a concern in young female survivors of hematological malignancies. We evaluated post-treatment ovarian function in patients by measuring anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and conventional hormone levels to correlate with menstruation and fertility.The prospective cohort study included 29 reproductive-aged women diagnosed with Hodgkin lymphoma (n = 11), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (n = 9) or acute myeloid leukemia (n = 9). Hormone assays were measured after treatment was completed and compared to age-matched healthy controls. Menstrual changes and postmenopausal symptoms were assessed annually.Serum AMH levels were significantly lower compared to controls at 12 months after treatment [1.0 (0.18-1.8) vs. 2.2 (1.8-4.8) ng/mL; P < .001). At 12 months, FSH and LH levels were significantly higher compared to controls. The interruption of menstrual cycles was observed in 80% (22/27) of patients. Normal menstruation returned at a median of 1.5 months after cessation of treatment in 71% of patients, while 29% of patients had persistent amenorrhea. Low AMH levels at 12 months after therapy (<1 ng/mL) correlated more strongly with abnormal menstrual cycles than normal AMH levels (46% vs. 0%, P = .04). Four patients with low AMH consulted an infertility clinic.In summary, low serum AMH at 12 months after chemotherapy was associated with persistent menstrual abnormalities.

An endocrine perspective on menstrual suppression for adolescents: achieving good suppression while optimizing bone health.

Suppression of menstruation and/or ovarian function in adolescent girls may be desired for a variety of reasons. Numerous medical options exist. The choice of the appropriate modality for an individual patient depends on several factors based on differences in the efficacy of achieving menstrual suppression as well as in their side effect profiles. Adolescence is also a period of bone mass accrual in girls, and several of these modalities may negatively influence peak bone mass. This review focuses on the efficacy of achieving menstrual suppression and the effect on bone health of the various options through an overview of the current literature and also highlights areas in need of further research.

Five-year changes in ovarian function restoration in premenopausal patients with breast cancer taking tamoxifen after chemotherapy: An ASTRRA study report.

BACKGROUND: Adding ovarian function suppression (OFS) after chemotherapy improves survival in young women with moderate- and high-risk breast cancer. Assessment of ovarian function restoration after chemotherapy becomes critical for subsequent endocrine treatment and addressing fertility issues. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the adding OFS after chemotherapy trial, patients who resumed ovarian function up to 2 years after chemotherapy were randomised to receive either 5 years of tamoxifen or adding 2 years of OFS with tamoxifen. Ovarian function was evaluated from enrolment to randomisation, and patients who did not randomise because of amenorrhoea for 2 years received tamoxifen and were followed up for 5 years. Prospectively collected consecutive hormone levels (proportion of patients with premenopausal follicle-stimulating hormone [FSH] levels <30 mIU/mL and oestradiol [E2] levels ≥40 pg/mL) and history of menstruation were available for 1067 patients with breast cancer. RESULTS: Over 5 years of tamoxifen treatment, 69% of patients resumed menstruation and 98% and 74% of patients satisfied predefined ovarian function restoration as per serum FSH and E2 levels, respectively. Menstruation was restored in 91% of patients younger than 35 years at baseline, but in only 33% of 45-year-old patients over 5 years. Among these patients, 41% experienced menstruation restoration within 2 years after chemotherapy and 28% slowly restored menstruation after 2-5 years. Younger age (<35 years) at baseline, anthracycline without taxanes and ≤90 days of chemotherapy were predictors of menstruation restoration. CONCLUSIONS: During 5 years of tamoxifen treatment after chemotherapy, two-thirds of the patients experienced menstruation restoration, especially patients younger than 35 years. Young age, Adriamycin without taxanes and short duration of chemotherapy appeared to have a positive effect on ovarian reserves in the long term. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00912548.

Does menstruation-related headache occur exclusively in women with migraine?

To determine the relation between headache and menstruation in women with migraine and the use of estrogen by these women. This was a prospective, cross-sectional, observational study with group comparison, using non-random sample and convenience. We interviewed 79 women diagnosed with migraine or tension-type headache (TTH), according to the ICHD-3, regarding the relation between headache and menstruation. Of the 79 women with headache, 60 (76%) had migraine and 19 (24%) had episodic TTH. The most frequent subtype of migraine was without aura (54/60, 90%). The age ranged from 18 to 42 years, with an average of 22.6 ± 4.1 years. Migraine affected women aged 22.4 ± 3.6 years, whereas in TTH, the age was 23.0 ± 5.4 years. Menstruation-related headache occurred in 41.9% of women with migraine and in only 6.3% of those with TTH. These differences were significant (χ2 = 5.2; p = 0.022). Of the five women diagnosed with migraine with aura, two used estrogen. Menstruation-related headache predominates in women with migraine and often women with migraine with aura use estrogen.

Options for Prevention and Management of Menstrual Bleeding in Adolescent Patients Undergoing Cancer Treatment: ACOG Committee Opinion, Number 817.

ABSTRACT: Obstetrician-gynecologists frequently are consulted either before the initiation of cancer treatment to request menstrual suppression or during an episode of severe heavy bleeding to stop bleeding emergently. Adolescents presenting emergently with severe uterine bleeding usually require only medical management; surgical management rarely is required. Surgical management should be considered for patients who are not clinically stable, or for those whose conditions are not suitable for medical management or have failed to respond appropriately to medical management. When used continuously, combined hormonal contraceptives are effective for producing amenorrhea, although complete amenorrhea cannot be guaranteed. The risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer is compounded by multiple factors, including presence of metastatic or fast-growing, biologically aggressive cancers; hematologic cancers; treatment-related factors such as surgery or central venous catheters; and the number and type of comorbid conditions. Although as a group, patients undergoing cancer treatment are at elevated risk of venous thromboembolism compared with the general population, this risk may be extremely elevated for certain patients and existing guidance on risk stratification should be consulted. The decision to use estrogen in patients with cancer should be tailored to the individual patient after collaborative consideration of the risk-benefit ratio with the patient and the health care team; the patient should be closely monitored for known adverse effects such as liver toxicity and venous thromboembolism.

Predicting menstrual bleeding patterns with levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine systems.

PURPOSE: To develop a bleeding-pattern prediction model to inform counselling on amount and regularity of bleeding after levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) placement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fixed-cluster and regression-tree models were developed using bleeding data pooled from two clinical trials of LNG-IUSs. Models were trained and cross-validated on LNG-IUS 12 data, then applied to LNG-IUS 20 and LNG-IUS 8 data. Three clusters were generated for the fixed-cluster model: predominantly amenorrhoea; predominantly spotting; and predominantly bleeding. A random-forest model predicted the future-bleeding cluster, then the probability of cycle regularity was calculated. In the regression-tree model, women were assigned by the model to less- or more-bleeding groups. RESULTS: With LNG-IUS 12 (n = 1351) in the fixed-cluster model, 70.4% of women were correctly classified. The correct classification rates for LNG-IUS 20 (n = 216) and LNG-IUS 8 (n = 1300) were 72.2% and 69.0%. The probability distribution for cycle regularity showed regular and irregular bleeding were best separated with LNG-IUS 12 data, and less well with LNG-IUS 20 and LNG-IUS 8 data. In the regression-tree model there was high variability in the more- and less-bleeding group distributions with LNG-IUS 12 data. CONCLUSIONS: A fixed-cluster model predicted bleeding patterns better than a regression-tree model in women using LNG-IUS, yielding understandable, informative output.

Progestogens or progestogen-releasing intrauterine systems for uterine fibroids (other than preoperative medical therapy).

BACKGROUND: Uterine fibroids can cause heavy menstrual bleeding. Medical treatments are considered to preserve fertility. It is unclear whether progestogens or progestogen-releasing intrauterine systems can reduce fibroid-related symptoms. This is the first update of a Cochrane Review published in 2013. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness of progestogens or progestogen-releasing intrauterine systems in treating premenopausal women with uterine fibroids. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO databases to July 2020. We also searched trials registers for ongoing and registered trials, and checked references of relevant trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: All identified published or unpublished randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of progestogens or progestogen-releasing intrauterine systems in treating premenopausal women with uterine fibroids. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently extracted data, assessed risk of bias, and assessed the quality of the evidence using the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS: This updated review included four studies with 221 women with uterine fibroids. The evidence was very low quality, downgraded for serious risk of bias, due to poor reporting of study methods, and serious imprecision. Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (LNG-IUS) versus hysterectomy There was no information on the outcomes of interest, including adverse events. LNG-IUS versus low dose combined oral contraceptive (COC) At 12 months, we are uncertain whether LNG-IUS reduced the percentage of abnormal uterine bleeding, measured with the alkaline hematin test (mean difference (MD) 77.50%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 70.44 to 84.56; 1 RCT, 44 women; very low-quality evidence), or the pictorial blood assessment chart (PBAC; MD 34.50%, 95% CI 11.59 to 57.41; 1 RCT, 44 women; very low-quality evidence); increased haemoglobin levels (MD 1.50 g/dL, 95% CI 0.85 to 2.15; 1 RCT, 44 women; very low-quality evidence), or reduced fibroid size more than COC (MD 1.90%, 95% CI -12.24 to 16.04; 1 RCT, 44 women; very low-quality evidence). The study did not measure adverse events. LNG-IUS versus oral progestogen (norethisterone acetate (NETA)) Compared to NETA, we are uncertain whether LNG-IUS reduced abnormal uterine bleeding more from baseline to six months (visual bleeding score; MD 23.75 points, 95% CI 1.26 to 46.24; 1 RCT, 45 women; very low-quality evidence); increased the percentage of change in haemoglobin from baseline to three months (MD 4.53%, 95% CI 1.46 to 7.60; 1 RCT, 48 women; very low-quality evidence), or from baseline to six months (MD 10.14%, 95% CI 5.57 to 14.71; 1 RCT, 45 women; very low-quality evidence). The study did not measure fibroid size. Spotting (adverse event) was more likely to be reported by women with the LNG-IUS (64.3%) than by those taking NETA (30%; 1 RCT, 45 women; very low-quality evidence). Oral progestogen (dienogest, desogestrel) versus goserelin acetate Compared to goserelin acetate, we are uncertain whether abnormal uterine bleeding was reduced at 12 weeks with dienogest (PBAC; MD 216.00 points, 95% CI 149.35 to 282.65; 1 RCT, 14 women; very low-quality evidence) or desogestrel (PBAC; MD 78.00 points, 95% CI 28.94 to 127.06; 1 RCT, 16 women; very low-quality evidence). Vasomotor symptoms (adverse events, e.g. hot flashes) are only associated with goserelin acetate (55%), not with dienogest (1 RCT, 14 women; very low-quality evidence) or with desogestrel (1 RCT, 16 women; very low-quality evidence). The study did not report fibroid size. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Because of very low-quality evidence, we are uncertain whether the LNG-IUS reduces abnormal uterine bleeding or increases haemoglobin levels in premenopausal women with uterine fibroids, compared to COC or norethisterone acetate. There was insufficient evidence to determine whether the LNG-IUS reduces the size of uterine fibroids compared to COC. We are uncertain whether oral progestogens reduce abnormal uterine bleeding as effectively as goserelin acetate, but women reported fewer adverse events, such as hot flashes.

Relugolix for the treatment of uterine fibroids.

INTRODUCTION: Uterine fibroids (UF) are benign tumors common in premenopausal women, with strong impact on the health-care systems. For many years, surgery represented the only therapy for symptomatic fibroids. However, clinicians are observing a switch from surgery to noninvasive methods; in particular, medical treatment has been shown to be efficacious in obtaining a bleeding reduction and in ameliorating patient conditions. AREAS COVERED: The authors review the current options available for the treatment of women with UF, with a special focus on the newest one, relugolix. It is an orally active non-peptide Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-receptor antagonist recently licensed for women with symptomatic fibroids. Relugolix is a well-tolerated safe drug; it is effective in inducing a dose-dependent decrease in menstrual blood loss, with faster reduction of heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) and a greater shrinkage in fibroid volume compared to the current standard of GnRH agonist treatment. EXPERT OPINION: Relugolix is a promising drug for the non-surgical treatment of women with UF. To date, the only published data come from a well-selected Japanese female population study while results from worldwide ongoing studies are ongoing in order to confirm the efficacy of this GnRH agonist receptor.

Insulin Sensitizers for Improving the Endocrine and Metabolic Profile in Overweight Women With PCOS.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of insulin sensitizers on menstrual frequency, sex hormone, and metabolic parameters in overweight women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). METHODS: We searched multiple databases from inception to September 2019 for randomized controlled trials. Network meta-analysis was conducted using multivariate random effects method. RESULTS: Fourteen trials reporting on 619 women were included. Compared with metformin, metformin + thiazolidinediones (TZDs) was more superior in menstrual recovery (weighted mean difference [WMD] 3.68; 95% credibility interval [CrI], 1.65 to 8.20), metformin +  glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists was more effective in decreasing androstenedione (WMD -2.53; 95% CrI, -3.96 to -1.09), both metformin + GLP-1 receptor agonists (WMD 9.22; 95% CrI, 5.46 to 12.98) and metformin + TZDs (WMD 4.30; 95% CrI, 0.78 to 7.82) were more effective in increasing sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), while TZDs were less effective in decreasing body mass index (BMI) (WMD 1.69; 95% CrI, 0.72 to 2.66). Compared with GLP-1 receptor agonists, metformin + GLP-1 receptor agonists was associated with higher SHBG (WMD 7.80; 95% CrI, 4.75 to 10.85), lower free testosterone (WMD -1.77; 95% CrI, -3.25 to -0.29), lower androstenedione (WMD -2.70; 95% CrI, -3.91 to -1.50) and lower fasting blood glucose (WMD -0.41; 95% CrI, -0.73 to -0.08). CONCLUSION: For overweight women with PCOS, both metformin combined with GLP-1 receptor agonists and metformin combined with TZDs appear superior to monotherapy in improving hyperandrogenemia. Metformin combined with TZDs could be particularly effective in promoting the recovery of menstruation. Metformin combined with GLP-1 receptor agonists has the additional advantage of improving fasting glucose when compared with GLP-1 receptor agonists alone. TZDs are inferior to metformin in decreasing BMI.

The impact of menstruation persistence or recovery after chemotherapy on survival in young patients with hormone receptor negative breast cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Hormone replacement therapy can diminish hormone depletion-related complaints in postmenopausal women, but is contraindicated for postmenopausal breast cancer (BC) patients. Recovery of menstruation after chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea in young hormone receptor-negative BC patients however, is accepted. To determine the safety of this strategy, we investigated the effect of recovery of menstruation on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in young hormone receptor-negative BC patients treated with (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: We selected 636 patients from a single-center cohort with early stage hormone receptor-negative BC and under the age of 50 years when treated with chemotherapy. Sufficient data on course of menstruation in medical records was retrospectively found for 397 patients, of whom 299 patients (75%) had a recovery of menstruation after chemotherapy. We used Cox proportional hazards models to estimate hazard ratios (HR) for the effect of recovery of menstruation on DFS and OS. RESULTS: Patients with recovery of menstruation after chemotherapy less frequently had lymph node involvement at diagnosis (45% vs 66%, p = 0.001). After a median follow-up of 6.7 years, the adjusted hazard ratios were 1.45 (95% CI: 0.83-2.54) for DFS and 1.19 (95% CI: 0.71-1.98) for OS. CONCLUSION: No significantly increased recurrence risk was found for hormone receptor-negative BC patients with recovery of menstruation after chemotherapy. However, the outcome of the multivariable model is not reassuring and a potentially increased recurrence risk cannot be excluded. The results need to be validated in a larger prospective study for a more definitive answer.

Metformin intervention against ovarian toxicity during chemotherapy for early breast cancer: Study protocol for a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: With the significant improvement of the cure rate and survival rate of cancer patients, the survivors face quality-of-life problems, such as a significant decline in reproductive system development, ovarian reserves and function, and even fertility loss and early menopause. These problems are often highly associated with chemotherapy-induced ovarian damage in cancer treatment. However, there are no ideal treatment strategies at present. In our attempt to develop reagents and approaches for delaying ovarian aging and protecting chemotherapy-induced ovarian injury, we recently found that metformin may be the most promising drug to protect female malignant tumor patients from chemotherapy-induced ovarian injury. This trial aims to test whether administration of metformin during chemotherapy can protect the normal ovarian function of patients with early breast cancer. METHODS: This study is prospective, randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled. Female patients with early breast cancer (N = 314) will be randomly assigned to two groups (placebo, metformin 2000 mg). Metformin will be administered during and after chemotherapy for patients with stage I-IIIa breast cancer. The primary outcome will be the menstruation recovery rate 12 months after chemotherapy, defined as recovery of menstruation twice in a row within 1 year. Patients will be followed up for 5 years to observe long-term ovarian function and prognosis, such as overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease-free survival (DFS). Quality of life and safety will also be assessed. DISCUSSION: Our research will provide a new treatment strategy for fertility protection, and clinical treatment guidance for cancer patients.

Feasibility and efficacy of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced ovarian insufficiency in patients with malignant ovarian germ cell tumours (KGOG 3048R).

BACKGROUND: This study assessed the effects of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) on the prevention of chemotherapy-induced ovarian insufficiency among young patients with malignant ovarian germ cell tumour (MOGCT) receiving chemotherapy. METHODS: This multicentre, retrospective study was conducted at 15 sites affiliated with the Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group and enrolled 354 patients between January 1995 and September 2018. Among them, 227 patients were included in this study and divided into two groups according to the use of GnRHa during chemotherapy (GnRHa versus no GnRHa groups). The primary objective was to compare the rates of menstrual resumption between the two groups. We also assessed the clinical determinants affecting menstrual resumption among the study groups. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the GnRHa (n = 63) and no GnRHa (n = 164) groups regarding age at diagnosis, parity, ethnicity, age at menarche, body mass index, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage, mode of surgery and surgery type. The rate of menstrual resumption after chemotherapy was 100% (63 of 63) in the GnRHa group and 90.9% (149 of 164) in the no GnRHa group (p = 0.013). The mean periods from last chemotherapy to menstrual resumption were 7.4 and 7.3 months in the GnRHa and no GnRHa groups, respectively. GnRHa co-administration during chemotherapy reduced the likelihood of amenorrhoea after chemotherapy, although statistical significance was not confirmed in the univariate analysis (odds ratio: 0.276; 95% confidence interval, 0.004-1.317; p = 0.077). CONCLUSION: Temporary ovarian suppression with GnRHa during chemotherapy does not significantly increase the chances of menstrual resumption in young patients with MOGCT.

Bleeding Patterns among Adolescents Using the Levonorgestrel Intrauterine Device: A Single Institution Review.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To describe the bleeding patterns associated with the use of the levonorgestrel intrauterine device (IUD) in adolescents. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective chart review of postmenarchal adolescent patients ages 8-19 years who had the levonorgestrel IUD inserted at Phoenix Children's Hospital from 2012 to 2018. INTERVENTIONS: Insertion of the 52-mg and 13.5-mg levonorgestrel IUD. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The rate of amenorrhea and other bleeding patterns after insertion of the levonorgestrel IUD and the factors that might predict those bleeding patterns. RESULTS: A total of 260 charts were identified with 221/260 (85.0%) patients choosing the 52-mg IUD and 39/260 (15.0%) patients choosing the 13.5-mg IUD to be inserted. Follow-up data were available for 166 patients. The overall rate of amenorrhea among IUD users was 39.8% (n = 66) with no difference between 52-mg and 13.5-mg IUD users (P = .656). Regularity and flow of menstrual cycle, history of bleeding disorder, history of developmental delay, and current treatment with testosterone for gender dysphoria before IUD insertion did not appear to have a significant effect on the rate of amenorrhea or bleeding patterns post-IUD insertion. CONCLUSION: The levonorgestrel IUD can be successfully used to control abnormal uterine bleeding and suppress menses in adolescents. Menstrual cycle characteristics pre-IUD insertion did not result in predictable post-IUD bleeding patterns.

Effect of Tahiti lime (Citrus latifolia) juice on the Production of the PGF2α/PGE2 and Pro-Inflammatory Cytokines involved in Menstruation.

Tahiti lemon juice (Citrus latifolia) (TLJ), as a natural source of flavonoids, has been used as an alternative to anti-inflammatory drugs for the treatment of dysmenorrhea and menstrual excessive bleeding, often associated with an imbalance of the prostaglandins (PG) levels. However, despite the positive effects, the mechanisms that rule menstruation control are still unknown. Therefore, the objectives were to characterize the TLJ and analyze its effect on the production of PGF2α, PGE2 and pro-inflammatory cytokines involved inmenstruation. Flavonoids from TLJ were discriminated by UPLC-DAD-MS/MS (Qq-TOF) and the effects of TLJ were studied in vitro by quantification of the contraction of myoblasts in culture and PGF2α and PGE2 productions. Further, the systemic and menstrual fluid levels of PGF2α, PGE2, IL-1ß, TNF-α, IL-6, AK1B1 and AK1C3 enzymes produced by women during the menstrual period were compared after exposition or not to TLJ or meloxicam. The results showed that TLJ induces an increase in the contraction of myoblasts and the PGF2α supernatant level. Regarding in vivo analysis, a higher concentration of PGF2α and an unaltered PGE2 level was also found in the menstrual blood of women treated with TLJ, in contrast with a lower level of PGE2 and PGF2α observed in the meloxicam group. Concerning cytokines, only menstrual TNF-α levels decrease after treatment with TLJ or meloxicam. In conclusion, TLJ may favor the control of menstruation events via a PGF2α mediated muscle contractile response.

Safety, influence on the endometrium, sonographic changes and bleeding profile after 13 cycles with the new drospirenone only pill (DOP) for contraception.

BACKGROUND: The primary objective of the present trial was to assess the endometrial safety of a new oral contraceptive containing 4 mg drospirenone for a total duration of 13 cycles of 28 days each: 24 days of active treatment followed by 4 days placebo treatment per treatment cycle. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a single-center, open-label, multiple-dose study on healthy female subjects at risk of pregnancy. Twenty one (= safety population set) pre-menopausal female Caucasian subjects started treatment with the study medication. The mean age was 29.0 years (range 19.0-36.0 years). Four subjects terminated the trial prematurely for the following reasons: on the subject's request (n=2), due to an adverse event (n=1) and due to loss of contact (n=1). Seventeen subjects completed the planned duration of 13 cycles of open treatment with the test product (each cycle of 28 days). RESULTS: At visit 1 (pre-treatment), the biopsy result in the safety population set was proliferative in 14 cases and secretory in seven cases. At visit 7, four cases showed an inadequate result (insufficient tissue for diagnosis), 12 as proliferative and three as secretory. The number of biopsies with proliferative and secretory results reduced under treatment (safety population). The pre-post treatment changes in the endometrial biopsy results in the treatment completers set (n=17) showed almost no differences. At visit 1 (pre-treatment), the biopsy result was proliferative in 12 cases and secretory in five cases. At visit 7 (after 13 cycles of 28 days), four cases showed an inadequate result (insufficient tissue for diagnosis), 11 as proliferative, and two as secretory. The mean endometrial thickness in the safety population was reduced from 8.3 mm at visit 1 to 6.0 mm at visit 7. When comparing the endometrial thickness in the 21 subjects (safety population), the endometrial thickness showed a pre-post difference of 2.1 mm, whereas the endometrial thickness in the 17 study completers showed a pre-post difference of 2.5 mm (8.2 mm at visit 1-5.6 mm at visit 7). CONCLUSIONS: Drospirenone 4 mg film-coated tablet in a dosage regime of 24/4 days is, regarding endometrial histology, a safe drug. Trial registration: EudraCT Register number: 2013-002300-13.