Effect of microaneurysms on the anti-VEGF treatment for diabetic macular edema: A retrospective cross-sectional study.

Although anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment is effective for treating diabetic macular edema (DME), the effect of the microaneurysm (MA) status on the therapeutic efficacy of an anti-VEGF treatment remains unclear. Our current study investigated the effects of the number and the presence or absence of leaking MAs on DME and the efficacy of anti-VEGF therapy. A total of 51 eyes of 47 DME patients were administered anti-VEGF treatment. Fluorescence angiography results were used to determine the number of MAs and the presence or absence of leakage, with these findings matched to the optical coherence tomography maps. The correlation between the number of MAs and the retinal thicknesses and the influence of the leaking MAs was examined in order to definitively determine the effect of the anti-VEGF treatment. There was a correlation between the number of MAs and the retinal thickness of the sector in both the 6 mm (correlation coefficients: 0.42) and 3 mm (0.34) sectors (P < .001). There was also a correlation between the number of MAs and the retinal thickness in both the 6 mm (0.31) and 3 mm (0.24) sectors after undergoing the treatment (P < .01). There was a significant difference between the mean thickness of the leaking versus the non-leaking MAs in the 6 mm (388 ±â€…87 µm) and 3 mm (477 ±â€…108 µm) sectors before treatment (P < .01). There was also a significant difference for the retinal thickness between the sectors with and without leaking MAs after the treatment (P < .01). The degree of retinal edema before treatment is associated with the number of MAs and the presence of leaking MAs. Anti-VEGF treatment is less effective for focal macular edema with large numbers of MAs, which includes leaking MAs.

Turnover of Microaneurysms After Intravitreal Injections of Faricimab for Diabetic Macular Edema.

Purpose: Microaneurysm (MA) plays an important role in the pathogenesis of diabetic macular edema (DME) progression and response to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy. This study aimed to investigate the effect of faricimab, a bispecific antibody against angiopoietin-2 and VEGF, on the number of MAs and their turnover in the treatment of DME. Methods: We included that patients with DME who underwent three monthly injections of faricimab in one eye, with the other eye as control. We examined central retinal thickness (CRT) based on optical coherence tomography (OCT) and best-corrected visual acuity. Turnover, including loss and newly formed MAs, and the total number of MAs were counted based on merged images of the OCT map and fluorescein angiography. Results: We enrolled 28 patients with DME. After 3 monthly injections of faricimab, CRT significantly improved, 66.0 ± 16.2% of MAs disappeared, and 6.71 ± 5.6% of new MAs were generated, resulting in total reduction to 40.7 ± 15.2%. In the treated eyes, MA disappearance (P < 0.0001) and turnover (P = 0.007) were significantly greater, and new formation was smaller (P < 0.0001) than in non-treated eyes. The size of the retained MAs decreased after treatment. Microaneurysm turnover was not significantly different between areas with and without edema before treatment. Conclusions: In the process of improving edema in DME with faricimab, MAs shrink and disappear, and formation of MAs are inhibited, resulting in decreased total number of MAs. Intravitreal administration of faricimab suppresses vascular permeability and improves vascular structure.

Evaluation of microaneurysms as predictors of therapeutic response to anti-VEGF therapy in patients with DME.

Administration of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy is the first-line therapy for diabetic macular oedema (DME). However, some patients show no or insufficient response to repeated anti-VEGF injections. Therefore, it is necessary to identify factors that can predict this resistance against anti-VEGF treatment. Presence of microaneurysms (MAs) is a predictor of the development and progression of DME, but its relationship with the treatment response to the anti-VEGF agents is not well known. Therefore, we aimed to elucidate the relationship between the distribution of MAs and the response to anti-VEGF therapy in patients with DME. The number of MAs was measured before anti-VEGF therapy in each region using fluorescein angiography, indocyanine green angiography (IA), and optical coherence tomography angiography. Patients with DME were divided into the responder and non-responder groups after three loading phases. Differences in the distribution of MAs between the groups were investigated. Pre-treatment IA revealed more MAs in the nasal area in the non-responder group than in the responder group (10.7 ± 10.7 and 5.7 ± 5.7, respectively, in the nasal macula) (1.4 ± 2.1 and 0.4 ± 0.7, respectively, in the nasal fovea). Whereas, pre-treatment FA and OCTA could not reveal significantly difference between the groups. Detection of MAs in the nasal macula using pre-treatment IA may indicate resistance to anti-VEGF therapy. We recommend the clinicians confirm the presence of MAs in the nasal macula, as shown by IA, as a predictor of therapeutic response to anti-VEGF therapy in patients with treatment naive DME.

Decrease in the number of microaneurysms in diabetic macular edema after anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy: implications for indocyanine green angiography-guided detection of refractory microaneurysms.

PURPOSE: We evaluated changes in the numbers of microaneurysms (MAs) on fluorescein angiography (FA) and indocyanine green angiography (IA) in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME) following intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents. METHODS: Twenty-one eyes of 16 patients with DME were included in this retrospective study. All patients received an initial loading dose of three monthly injections of anti-VEGF agents; thereafter, they received a pro re nata regimen for at least 12 months of follow-up. FA and IA images were obtained before and at 6 months after the initial injection. RESULTS: The median numbers of MAs significantly decreased from six (interquartile range [IQR] 3-7) MAs in early-phase FA, three (IQR 3-5) leaky MAs in late-phase FA, and two (IQR 1-4) MAs in late-phase IA at baseline to two (IQR 1-3) MAs in early-phase FA, one (IQR 0-2) leaky MA in late-phase FA, and one (IQR 0-2) MA in late-phase IA at 6 months (P < 0.0001 for all). Only the median numbers of MAs in late-phase IA at baseline and at 6 months were significantly higher in the recurrent DME group (13 eyes) than in the non-recurrent DME group (five eyes) (three [IQR 2-4] vs one [IQR 1-2], one [IQR 0.5-2] vs zero [P = 0.0185 and P = 0.009]). CONCLUSION: Intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF agents reduced the numbers of MAs in patients with DME. The numbers of MAs detected by late-phase IA might be useful predictors of DME recurrence.