Acute and chronic treatment with moclobemide, a reversible MAO-inhibitor, potentiates the antielectroshock activity of conventional antiepileptic drugs in mice.

BACKGROUND: Due to enhancing serotonergic and noradrenergic neurotransmission, moclobemide may influence seizure phenomena. In this study, we examined the effect of both acute and chronic treatment with moclobemide on seizures and the action of first-generation antiepileptic drugs: valproate, carbamazepine, phenobarbital and phenytoin. METHODS: The effect of moclobemide on seizures was assessed in the electroconvulsive threshold test, while its influence on antiepileptic drugs was estimated in the maximal electroshock test in mice. Undesired effects were evaluated in the chimney test (motor impairment) and step-through passive-avoidance task (long-term memory deficits). Finally, brain concentrations of antiepileptics were determined by fluorescence polarization immunoassay. RESULTS: Given acutely, moclobemide at 62.5 and 75 mg/kg increased the electroconvulsive threshold. In contrast, chronic treatment with moclobemide up to 75 mg/kg did not influence this parameter. Acute moclobemide applied at subthreshold doses (up to 50 mg/kg) enhanced the antielectroshock effects of carbamazepine, valproate and phenobarbital. Chronic moclobemide (37.5-75 mg/kg) increased the action of all four antiepileptic drugs. All revealed interactions, except these between moclobemide and phenobarbital, seem to have pharmacokinetic nature, because the antidepressant drug, either in acute or in chronic treatment, increased the brain concentrations of respective antiepileptic drugs. In terms of undesired neurotoxic effects, acute and chronic moclobemide, antiepileptic drugs, and their combinations did not produce significant motor or long-term memory impairment. CONCLUSIONS: Acute and chronic therapy with moclobemide can increase the effectiveness of some antiepileptic drugs against the maximal electroshock test. In mice, this effect was, at least partially, due to pharmacokinetic interactions. So far as the results of experimental studies can be transferred to clinical conditions, moclobemide seems safe for the application in patients with epilepsy and depression. Possibly, in the case of certain antiepileptic drugs combined with moclobemide, their doses should be adjusted downwards.

Bioavailability of moclobemide from two formulation tablets in healthy humans.

A ,,sine qua non" requirement for a generic formulation to be admitted for a medical use is to provide bioavailability studies in healthy subjects. Therefore, those studies were performed for 150 mg moclobemide tablets (Jelfa, Poland) versus 150 mg Aurorix (Hoffmann la Roche) reference tablets. An open-label, two-phase crossover study was conducted with 10 healthy subjects. Pharmacokinetic parameters (AUC, ke, t1/2, Cmax, tmax, tlag, V/f, Cl/f) obtained at the same time for moclobemide were supposed to be confronted with the literature data available for healthy volunteers. The plasma moclobemide levels as a function of time were calculated according to either an open one-compartment body model with lag time of absorption or non-compartmental method for calculation of bioavailability using Phoenix WinNonlin 8.0 software. For those reasons a suitable HPLC method was worked out. Carbamazepine was proposed as an internal standard and ammonia as well as Na2HPO4 as alkalizing agents for the mobile phase and the liquid-liquid extraction of moclobemide from human blood plasma, respectively. Basic pharmacokinetic parameters of moclobemide obtained in the paper are essentially equal to the literature data for the healthy subjects. However, bioavailability parameters (AUC0→t, AUC0→∞, Cmax, tmax) were greater for moclobemide tablets (Jelfa) if compared to Aurorix tablets (Roche) by more than 20 %. Furthermore, the extent of bioavailability (110.6 %) for the generic moclobemide tablets if compared to Aurorix tablets is not significantly different. It seems to us that the number of subjects should be increased from 10 to 24 to help to clarify that inconsequence.

Monoamine oxidase A inhibition protects the myocardium after experimental acute volume overload.

OBJECTIVE: The molecular pathway leading to myocardial cellular destruction after acute volume overload (AVO) may include monoamine oxidases. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether moclobemide (Mo), a monoamine oxidase inhibitor, protects the myocardium after AVO. METHODS: Sixty syngeneic Fischer rats underwent surgical abdominal aortocaval fistula to induce AVO. Eighteen rats were treated with Mo 10 mg/kg/day and were compared with 42 untreated rats with AVO without treatment. Myocardial recovery was analyzed using quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction for hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha, inducible nitric oxide synthase, interleukin 6, E-selectin, atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), brain natriuretic peptide, vascular endothelial growth factor-alpha, matrix metalloproteinase 9, chitinase 3-like protein (YKL-40), and transforming growth factor-beta. RESULTS: After 3 days, the relative number of ischemic intramyocardial arteries in the left ventricle was lower in AVO treated with Mo than in without [0.04 (0.02-0.07) vs. 0.09 (0.07-0.14), point score unit]. After 1 day, ANP was lower in AVO treated with Mo than in without [0.95 (0.37-1.84) vs. 2.40 (1.33-3.09), fold changes from the baseline (FC), p=0.044], whereas after 1 and 3 days, YKL-40 was higher in AVO treated with Mo than in without [22.66 (14.05-28.83) vs. 10.06 (6.23-15.02), FC, p=0.006 and 6.03 (4.72-7.18) vs. 3.70 (2.62-5.35), FC, p=0.025]. CONCLUSION: Mo decreases intramyocardial arterial ischemia of the left ventricle after AVO while increases YKL-40, reflecting cellular protection during early cardiac remodeling. In the future, adding Mo may be a simple means for myocardial protection after AVO.

The influence of selective A1 and A2A receptor antagonists on the antidepressant-like activity of moclobemide, venlafaxine and bupropion in mice.

OBJECTIVE: The main goal of our study was to investigate whether a selective antagonism of the adenosine A1 or A2A receptors is able to enhance the antidepressant activity of commonly prescribed drugs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All experiments were carried out on male Albino Swiss mice. The forced swim test and the tail suspension test were used to evaluate the antidepressant-like potential. Drug concentrations in animals' serum and brains were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. KEY FINDINGS: The antidepressant potential of moclobemide (1.5 mg/kg), venlafaxine (1 mg/kg) and bupropion (10 mg/kg) was enhanced by a co-administration with 3,7-dimethyl-1-propargylxanthine (DMPX; an antagonist of adenosine A2A receptors; 3 mg/kg) or 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (an antagonist of adenosine A1 receptors; 1 mg/kg). However, significant interactions between the tested substances were detected only in the experiments with DMPX. The nature of the observed interplays is rather pharmacodynamic than pharmacokinetic, because neither serum nor brain concentrations of the used drugs were significantly increased. CONCLUSIONS: Blockage of the adenosine receptors (particularly the A2A subtypes) could be considered in future as a novel, promising part of the combined antidepressant therapy. However, further studies on this subject are needed.

Nicotinic Acid Long-Term Effectiveness in a Patient with Bipolar Type II Disorder: A Case of Vitamin Dependency.

Nicotinic acid (NA), often called niacin, a form of vitamin B3, is a water-soluble nutrient found in animal and vegetarian foods. Vitamin B3 for healthy people is considered to be needed in doses of less than 20 mg daily. In higher doses, NA has been described to be beneficial in some patients with psychiatric disorders. This report describes a male patient with bipolar type II disorder who for many years had been treated with lithium and other medications applied in affective disorders. These pharmacological drugs had beneficial effects but were at times insufficient. When the patient was prescribed NA, he experienced a comparatively strong effect. Slowly it was discovered that the patient could lower and cease all medications except NA. For over 11 years he has been stable and calm with NA and currently takes 1 g three times daily. When not taking NA, he consistently became anxious and depressed within 2-3 days. The resumption of NA resulted in a normal state usually within 1 day. This finding has been described as a vitamin dependency. The paper discusses possible mechanisms for the effect of NA in this patient. Further studies are needed to investigate the prevalence of vitamin B3 dependency and the biochemical explanations for this phenomenon.

Moclobemide as add-on therapy to agomelatine in a patient with treatment-resistant major depressive disorder: a psychopharmacological case.

OBJECTIVE: Treatment-resistant depression is a major depressive disorder that does not respond to adequate treatment of at least two antidepressants and is one of the major clinical challenges for clinicians and clinical pharmacists. One treatment option is to switch the patient to a different medication. Another option is to add a medication to the patient's current pharmacotherapy. This article presents an improvement of symptoms induced by a combination of moclobemide (MOC) and agomelatine (AG) treatment in a 48-year-old Caucasian woman with treatment-resistant major depressive disorder (MDD). The patient had been treated with numerous antidepressants in the last 2 years that had not been effective or had caused serious adverse effects. When MOC 300 mg daily was added to AG 25 mg daily, the patient recovered progressively without any adverse effects. Her functional status also appeared stable. No other drugs known to interact with AG were administered. The MOC dose was subsequently increased to 600 mg daily and was taken with AG 25 mg daily and zolpidem 5 mg daily. DISCUSSION: The positive effects of AG or MOC on MDD have been widely reported, but there have not been reports of a combined treatment with MOG and AG improving symptoms of treatment-resistant MDD. The exact mechanism of this effect on the central nervous system is unknown. The additive activity could have been caused by a broader spectrum activity of AG and MOC. CONCLUSION: In this report, we identified a case with positive evidence of this antidepressant combination relieving the symptoms of treatment-resistant MDD, which is otherwise difficult to manage. This case report may serve to help clinicians and clinical pharmacists as a new treatment option for treatment-resistant MDD, although further research is needed to confirm this practice.

The separate and combined effects of monoamine oxidase A inhibition and nicotine on resting state EEG.

While nicotine is often associated with the neuropsychological effects of tobacco smoke, the robust monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibition observed in chronic smokers is also likely to play a role. Electroencephalographically-indexed alterations in baseline neural oscillations by nicotine have previously been reported in both smokers and non-smokers, however, little is known about the effects of MAO inhibition in combination with nicotine on resting state EEG. In a sample of 24 healthy non-smoking males, the effects of 6 mg nicotine gum, as well as MAO-A inhibition via 75 mg moclobemide, were investigated in separate and combined conditions over four separate test sessions. Drug effects were observed in the alpha2, beta2, and theta band frequencies. Nicotine increased alpha2 power, and moclobemide decreased beta2 power. Theta power was decreased most robustly by the combination of both drugs. Therefore, this study demonstrated that the nicotinic and MAO inhibiting properties of tobacco may differentially influence fast-wave oscillations (alpha2 and beta2), while acting in synergy to influence theta oscillations.

The separate and combined effects of monoamine oxidase A inhibition and nicotine on the mismatch negativity event related potential.

The mismatch negativity (MMN) auditory event-related potential (ERP) has been extensively studied as a potential biomarker for abnormal auditory processing in schizophrenia (SZ), a population which exhibits abnormally high smoking rates. The relationship between nicotinic activation and cognition in SZ may be related to underlying nicotinic and NMDA receptor dysfunction within the disease. However, transient cognitive improvements via smoking in patients may also result from monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibition, achieved through tobacco smoke. In 24 healthy non-smoking males, we investigated the separate and combined effects of nicotine and MAO-A inhibition via moclobemide (75mg) on the optimal-5 variation of the MMN paradigm. No significant drug effects were observed in our total sample, however, stratification of individuals into low (N=12) and high (N=12) baseline MMN amplitude groups revealed increases in duration MMN amplitude relative to placebo by nicotine, as well as moclobemide, but not after the combination of the two. Because previous research has shown there was no effect of monoamine modulation on MMN, this study shows an unexpected effect of moclobemide on duration MMN.

Chronic administration of imipramine but not agomelatine and moclobemide affects the nitrergic relaxation of rabbit corpus cavernosum smooth muscle.

Sexual dysfunction is a common and underestimated effect of antidepressants. However, the mechanism by which these drugs cause erectile dysfunction is unclear. We investigated the reactivity of the corpus cavernosum of rabbits that were treated with either chronic imipramine, which is a tricyclic agent; agomelatine, which is a melatonergic agonist and serotonin 5HT(2c) antagonist; or moclobemide, which is a reversible inhibitor of monoamine-oxidase A. Twenty rabbits were randomly divided into four groups: the control group (n=5), the imipramine-treated group (n=5), which received i.p. injections of 10 mg/kg/day of imipramine, the moclobemide-treated group (n=5), which received i.p. injections of 20 mg/kg/day of moclobemide, and the agomelatine-treated group (n=5), which was orally administered 10 mg/kg/day of agomelatine. The reactivities of corpus cavernosum tissue obtained from the antidepressant-treated and the control groups were studied in organ chambers after the animals were subjected to 21 days of drug administration. The acetylcholine-induced endothelium-dependent and the electrical field stimulation (EFS)-induced neurogenic relaxation of the corpus cavernosum of the imipramine-treated group was significantly decreased compared with the control group. However, neither the acetylcholine- nor EFS-induced relaxation was changed in the moclobemide- or agomelatine-treated groups. There were no change in the relaxant response to the nitric oxide (NO) donor sodium nitroprusside and contractile response to KCl between the groups. This study suggests that chronic imipramine treatment but not agomelatine and moclobemide treatments causes significant functional changes in the penile erectile tissue of rabbits and that these changes may contribute to the development of impotence.

Evaluation of single-point sampling strategies for the estimation of moclobemide exposure in depressive patients.

Because moclobemide pharmacokinetics vary considerably among individuals, monitoring of plasma concentrations lends insight into its pharmacokinetic behavior and enhances its rational use in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether single concentration-time points could adequately predict moclobemide systemic exposure. Pharmacokinetic data (full 7-point pharmacokinetic profiles), obtained from 21 depressive inpatients receiving moclobemide (150 mg 3 times daily), were randomly split into development (n = 18) and validation (n = 16) sets. Correlations between the single concentration-time points and the area under the concentration-time curve within a 6-hour dosing interval at steady-state (AUC(0-6)) were assessed by linear regression analyses. The predictive performance of single-point sampling strategies was evaluated in the validation set by mean prediction error, mean absolute error, and root mean square error. Plasma concentrations in the absorption phase yielded unsatisfactory predictions of moclobemide AUC(0-6). The best estimation of AUC(0-6) was achieved from concentrations at 4 and 6 hours following dosing. As the most reliable surrogate for moclobemide systemic exposure, concentrations at 4 and 6 hours should be used instead of predose trough concentrations as an indicator of between-patient variability and a guide for dose adjustments in specific clinical situations.

Hypothermia in a combined intoxication with doxepin and moclobemide in an adolescent.

OBJECTIVE: Intoxication with antidepressants, frequently encountered in pediatric emergency medicine, can often lead to life threatening situations. While hyperthermia, hypertonicity and rigidity are symptoms indicative of a serotonin syndrome triggered by an intoxication with serotonin reuptake inhibitors or monoamine oxidase inhibitors, cardiotoxicity, coma and ECG changes are typical of an intoxication with tricyclic antidepressants. CASE REPORT: Hypothermia (instead of the expected hyperthermia) is described for the first time as a persistent symptom during the course of a combined moclobemide-doxepin intoxication in an attempted suicide of a 16-year-old adolescent. DISCUSSION: The administration of serotonin reuptake inhibitors alone or in combination with other medication which increases the level of 5-hydroxytryptamine, i.e. serotonin, in the synaptic cleft mainly leads to hyperthermia. According to a recent study, however, the application of a selective 5-HT(1a) agonist to transgenic mice with a prominent overexpression of the 5-HT(1a) receptor lead to immobility and hypothermia. These findings might help to explain the hypothermia observed in the case of the intoxicated 16-year-old. CONCLUSION: Intoxication with antidepressants should not be excluded a priori in a hypothermic patient who displays other clinical signs of the said intoxication.

Efficacy of moclobemide in a rat model of neurotoxicant-induced edema.

The potent antidepressant effect of moclobemide, a selective and reversible type A monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitor, is clinically established. In view of the ongoing debate on the neuroprotective properties of MAO inhibitors, the present study was undertaken to further define the protective effect of moclobemide in a rat model of neurotoxicant-induced edema. In this model, daily oral triethyltin (TET) administration for 5 consecutive days strongly perturbed the rat behaviour and induced a cerebral edema at the 5th day. Oral coadministration of moclobemide (2 x 100 mg.kg-1.day-1) with TET blocked the development of brain edema and the increase in the cerebral chloride content induced by TET. Moreover, moclobemide reduced the increase in the cerebral sodium content and attenuated the neurological deficit. In conclusion, moclobemide possesses potent protective properties in this rat model of cerebral edema, suggesting potential clinical utility as a neuroprotectant.

The effects of co-administration of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine ("ecstasy") or para-methoxyamphetamine and moclobemide at elevated ambient temperatures on striatal 5-HT, body temperature and behavior in rats.

We have recently demonstrated that co-administration of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, "ecstasy") with the reversible monoamine oxidase type A (MAO-A) inhibitor moclobemide at an ambient temperature of 22 degrees C significantly increases striatal 5-HT outflow and 5-HT-mediated behaviors. In the present study, using microdialysis, we examined the effects of co-administration of MDMA or para-methoxyamphetamine (PMA) with moclobemide on striatal 5-HT outflow at the elevated ambient temperatures of 30 degrees C. Samples were collected every 30 min for 4 h and analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography assay with electrochemical detection (HPLC-ED). 5-HT-mediated effects on body temperature and behavior were also recorded. Rats were treated with either saline or 20 mg/kg (i.p.) moclobemide, followed by 10 mg/kg (i.p.) MDMA, 10 mg/kg (i.p.) PMA or saline 60 min later. Both MDMA and PMA produced significant increases in 5-HT outflow (370% peak and 309% peak, respectively, P<0.05). MDMA and PMA significantly increased body temperature (+2.0 degrees C and +2.1 degrees C, respectively, P<0.01) and drug-related behaviors (P<0.05). When MDMA or PMA was co-administered with moclobemide, additional significant increases were seen in 5-HT outflow (850% peak, P<0.01 and 1450% peak, P<0.001, respectively) and only MDMA showed additional significant increase in body temperature (+5.0 degrees C, P<0.001). No additional increases were seen in behavioral activity. When moclobemide was co-administered with MDMA, sustained increases in body temperature were recorded that were significantly higher than with MDMA alone and such increases were not observed in our previous study at normal room temperature. Our results suggest greater risk of MDMA-induced adverse effects on body temperature regulation, compared with PMA, when used in combination with moclobemide at elevated ambient temperatures.

Long-term antidepressant treatment with moclobemide for aphasia in acute stroke patients: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Pharmacotherapy aimed at stroke rehabilitation through direct central nervous effects may be assumed to work in a similar way for language recovery and sensory-motor recovery. Some data suggest that antidepressant drugs could be beneficial also for functional improvement. This prompted us to investigate whether regression from aphasia after acute stroke could be enhanced by antidepressive drug therapy. METHODS: We randomised 90 acute stroke patients with aphasia to either 600 mg moclobemide or placebo daily for 6 months, within 3 weeks of the onset of stroke. Aphasia was assessed prior to treatment and at 6 months, using Reinvang's 'Grunntest for afasi' and the Amsterdam-Nijmegen-Everyday-Language-Test (ANELT). RESULT: The degree of aphasia decreased significantly at 6 months, with no difference between the moclobemide- and the placebo-treated groups. Multivariate regression analysis including treatment group, activities of daily living, aetiology of stroke, ANELT, and Reinvang's coefficient at baseline, and neurological deficit confirmed these results. In all, 13 in the moclobemide and 10 in the placebo group stopped taking the study medication. No further change was found in the 56 aphasic patients followed up for another 6 months with no medication. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to placebo, treatment with moclobemide for 6 months did not enhance the regression of aphasia following an acute stroke.

Effect of oral linezolid on the pressor response to intravenous tyramine.

AIMS: To investigate the effect of monoamine oxidase A inhibition from a single oral dose of linezolid on the pressor response to intravenous (i.v.) tyramine, using positive and negative controls to validate the methodology. METHODS: This placebo-controlled, three-period crossover study was conducted in 12 healthy male volunteers. Each volunteer received either one oral dose of moclobemide (300 mg), linezolid (600 mg), or placebo tablet followed by an i.v. tyramine pressor test until an increase in systolic blood pressure of at least 30 mmHg above baseline occurred. Each study day was separated by a 7-day washout period. The dose of tyramine required to raise the blood pressure by 30 mmHg (TYR30) was calculated for each oral treatment by linear interpolation between log-transformed doses of i.v. tyramine. The influence of body mass index (BMI) on TYR30 was also investigated. RESULTS: The tyramine sensitivity factor (ratio of the geometric least square mean TYR30 for placebo and active oral treatment) was 1.8 [90% confidence interval (CI) 1.6, 2.0, P < 0.0001] for linezolid and 2.1 (90% CI 1.8, 2.4, P < 0.0001) for the positive control moclobemide. BMI had a statistically significant effect on TYR30. CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant difference in the pressor response to i.v. tyramine between linezolid and placebo. Moclobemide (positive control) and linezolid have a similar pressor response to i.v. tyramine. The statistically significant effect of BMI on TYR30 underlines the advantage of within-individual comparisons of treatments in order to reduce variability and provide more accurate treatment estimates.

Moclobemide: therapeutic use and clinical studies.

Moclobemide is a reversible inhibitor of monoamine-oxidase-A (RIMA) and has been extensively evaluated in the treatment of a wide spectrum of depressive disorders and less extensively studied in anxiety disorders. Nearly all meta-analyses and most comparative studies indicated that in the acute management of depression this drug is more efficacious than placebo and as efficacious as tricyclic (or some heterocyclic) antidepressants or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). There is a growing evidence that moclobemide is not inferior to other antidepressants in the treatment of subtypes of depression, such as dysthymia, endogenous (unipolar and bipolar), reactive, atypical, agitated, and retarded depression as with other antidepressants limited evidence suggests that moclobemide has consistent long-term efficacy. However, more controlled studies addressing this issue are needed. For patients with bipolar depression the risk of developing mania seems to be not higher with moclobemide than with other antidepressants. The effective therapeutic dose range for moclobemide in most acute phase trials was 300 to 600 mg, divided in 2 to 3 doses. While one controlled trial and one long-term open-label study found moclobemide to be efficacious in social phobia, three controlled trials subsequently revealed either no effect or less robust effects with the tendency of higher doses (600 - 900 mg/d) to be more efficacious. Two comparative trials demonstrated moclobemide to be as efficacious as fluoxetine or clomipramine in patients suffering from panic disorder. Placebo-controlled trials in this indication are, however, still lacking. A relationship between the plasma concentration of moclobemide and its therapeutic efficacy is not apparent but a positive correlation with adverse events has been found. Dizziness, nausea and insomnia occurred more frequently on moclobemide than on placebo. Due to negligible anticholinergic and antihistaminic actions, moclobemide has been better tolerated than tri- or heterocyclic antidepressants. Gastrointestinal side effects and, especially, sexual dysfunction were much less frequent with moclobemide than with SSRIs. Unlike irreversible MAO-inhibitors, moclobemide has a negligible propensity to induce hypertensive crisis after ingestion of tyramine-rich food ("cheese-reaction"). Therefore, dietary restrictions are not as strict. However, with moclobemide doses above 900 mg/d the risk of interaction with ingested tyramine might become clinically relevant. After multiple dosing the oral bioavailability of moclobemide reaches almost 100%. At therapeutic doses, moclobemide lacks significant negative effects on psychomotor performance, cognitive function or cardiovascular system. Due to the relative freedom from these side effects, moclobemide is particularly attractive in the treatment of elderly patients. Moclobemide is a substrate of CYP2C19. Although it acts as an inhibitor of CYP1A2, CYP2C19, and CYP2D6, relatively few clinically important drug interactions involving moclobemide have been reported. It is relatively safe even in overdose. The drug has a short plasma elimination half-life that allows switching to an alternative agent within 24 h. Since it is well tolerated, therapeutic doses can often be reached rapidly upon onset of treatment. Steady-state plasma levels are reached approximately at one week following dose adjustment. Patients with renal dysfunction require no dose reduction in contrast to patients with severe hepatic impairment. Cases of refractory depression might improve with a combination of moclobemide with other antidepressants, such as clomipramine or a SSRI. Since this combination has rarely been associated with a potentially lethal serotonin syndrome, it requires lower entry doses, a slower dose titration and a more careful monitoring of patients. Combination therapy with moclobemide and other serotonergic agents, or opioids, should be undertaken with caution, although no serious adverse events have been published with therapeutic doses of moclobemide to date. On the basis of animal data the combined use of moclobemide with pethidine or dextropropoxyphene should be avoided. There is no evidence that moclobemide would increase body weight or produce seizures. Some preclinical data suggest that moclobemide may have anticonvulsant property.

Treatment of depression with comorbid anxiety disorders: differential efficacy of paroxetine versus moclobemide.

To compare the efficacy and tolerability of moclobemide versus paroxetine for the treatment of depression with comorbid anxiety disorders. Outpatients fulfilling DSM-III-R criteria for major depression or dysthymia and for a co-occurring comorbid anxiety disorder (panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder or obsessive-compulsive disorder) after a 1-week run-in phase were randomly assigned to open-label moclobemide (300-600 mg/day) or paroxetine (20-40 mg/day) for 4 months. Primary criterion for response was a 50% score reduction from baseline on Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale scores. Mean changes in Clinical Global Impressions Severity of Illness and Improvement Scales (CGI-I) were also used to evaluate treatment response. Of the 123 patients included in the study, 65 were randomly assigned to moclobemide and 58 to paroxetine. At study end, the two treatment groups did not differ significantly in terms of proportion of responders. Treatment group differences emerged when comorbid anxiety diagnoses were considered. In patients with comorbid panic disorder, paroxetine was superior to moclobemide in improving both anxiety and depression (five patients out of 18 in the moclobemide group and nine out of 14 in the paroxetine group were rated as responders according to CGI-I, P = 0.04). Neither medication was superior in treating comorbid generalized anxiety disorder. These findings indicate that both moclobemide and paroxetine are effective for treatment of depression with comorbid anxiety disorders. However, in the subgroup with comorbid panic disorder, paroxetine is more effective than moclobemide in reducing both depressive and anxiety symptoms.

Moclobemide is effective and well tolerated in the long-term pharmacotherapy of social anxiety disorder with or without comorbid anxiety disorder.

Social phobia (social anxiety disorder) is a highly prevalent and chronic disorder that is associated with significant comorbidity and disability. Despite recent advances in the pharmacotherapy of the disorder, there is a paucity of randomized controlled trials on patients with comorbid disorders and on maintenance treatment. A randomized placebo-controlled, double-blind multi-site trial of moclobemide, a reversible inhibitor of monoamine oxidase A, was undertaken with 390 subjects. After an initial 12 weeks, there was the option of continuing for an additional 6 months of treatment. The primary efficacy parameter chosen was responder status as defined by the Clinical Global Impression scale change item. From week 4 onwards, there was a significantly higher response rate on moclobemide than on placebo. Superiority of medication over placebo was similar in patients with comorbid anxiety disorders (33% of subjects) and without, as well as in patients with different subtypes of social anxiety disorder; indeed, treatment with moclobemide rather than placebo was the strongest predictor of response. Adverse events were similar across treatment groups, and were typically mild and transient. In the extension phase, response rates remained higher in the moclobemide group, and ratings of tolerability were equally high in both groups. Thus, in a large sample of social anxiety disorder patients with and without comorbid anxiety disorders, moclobemide was both effective and well-tolerated in the short as well as long-term. These data confirm and extend previous findings on the value of moclobemide in the treatment of social anxiety disorder, and strengthen the range of therapeutic options for managing this important disorder.

Differential effects of chronic antidepressant treatments on micro- and delta-opioid receptors in rat brain.

We performed an autoradiographic study of [D-Ala(2),MePhe(4),Gly-ol(5)]enkephalin (DAMGO)-sensitive [(3)H]naloxone binding to micro-opioid receptors and of [(3)H][D-Pen(2),D-Pen(5)]enkephalin (DPDPE) binding to delta-opioid receptors in the rat brain after 4- or 21-day treatments with paroxetine, reboxetine and moclobemide to investigate the participation of these receptors in the adaptive mechanisms occurring during the delay of action of new generation antidepressants. Paroxetine increased micro-opioid receptor binding site density in cingulate and insular cortices, dorsal endopiriform nucleus (4 days) and olfactory tubercle (21 days) and decreased it in thalamus (21 days). Reboxetine increased it in amygdala (4 days), hippocampus and thalamus (21 days) and decreased it in dorsal raphe (4 days). Moclobemide increased it in hippocampus (4 days) and decreased it in anterior olfactory nucleus, frontal cortex, amygdala and hypothalamus (21 days). Moclobemide increased delta-opioid receptor binding site density in frontal cortex and amygdala (4 days) and decreased it in amygdala and colliculi (21 days). Opioid receptors displayed distinct patterns of adaptations in response to the three antidepressants studied.