RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To systematically review the literature on the unit cost and cost-effectiveness of malaria control. METHODS: Ten databases and gray literature sources were searched to identify evidence relevant to the period 2005 to 2018. Studies with primary financial or economic cost data from malaria endemic countries that took a provider, provider and household, or societal perspective were included. RESULTS: We identified 103 costing studies. The majority of studies focused on individual rather than combined interventions, notably insecticide-treated bed nets and treatment, and commonly took a provider perspective. A third of all studies took place in 3 countries. The median provider economic cost of protecting 1 person per year ranged from $1.18 to $5.70 with vector control and from $0.53 to $5.97 with chemoprevention. The median provider economic cost per case diagnosed with rapid diagnostic tests was $6.06 and per case treated $9.31 or $89.93 depending on clinical severity. Other interventions did not share enough similarities to be summarized. Cost drivers were rarely reported. Cost-effectiveness of malaria control was reiterated, but care in methodological and reporting standards is required to enhance data transferability. CONCLUSIONS: Important information that can support resource allocation was reviewed. Given the variability in methods and reporting, global efforts to follow existing standards are required for the evidence to be most useful outside their study context, supplemented by guidance on options for transferring existing data across settings.
Asunto(s)
Quimioprevención/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio/economía , Control de Insectos/economía , Malaria/prevención & control , Salud Global , Humanos , Mosquiteros Tratados con Insecticida/economía , Mosquitos VectoresRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Insecticide-treated mosquito nets (ITNs) are highly effective for the control of malaria. Yet widely distributed ITNs have been repurposed as fishing nets throughout the world. OBJECTIVES: Herein we present a synthesis of the current knowledge of ITN fishing and the toxicity of pyrethroids and discuss the potential implications of widespread fishing with ITNs. We further review effective management strategies in tropical fisheries to explore a framework for managing potential ITN fishing impacts. DISCUSSION: Pyrethroids are toxic to fish and aquatic environments, and fishing with ITNs may endanger the health of fisheries. Furthermore, although human toxicity to the pyrethroid insecticides that impregnate ITNs is traditionally thought to be low, recent scientific advances have shown that pyrethroid exposure is associated with a host of human health issues, including neurocognitive developmental disorders, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. Although it is known that ITN fishing is widespread, the implications for both fisheries and human communities is understudied and may be severe. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP7001.
Asunto(s)
Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales , Contaminantes Ambientales , Mosquiteros Tratados con Insecticida , Insecticidas , Piretrinas , Animales , Contaminantes Ambientales/toxicidad , Explotaciones Pesqueras , Humanos , Mosquiteros Tratados con Insecticida/economía , Mosquiteros Tratados con Insecticida/normas , Malaria/prevención & control , Control de Mosquitos/instrumentación , Pobreza , Piretrinas/toxicidadRESUMEN
One of the stated goals of the London Declaration on Neglected Tropical Diseases is the interruption of domiciliary transmissions of Chagas disease in the region of the Americas. We used a game-theoretic approach to assess the voluntary use of insecticide treated nets (ITNs) in the prevention of the spread of infection through vector bites. Our results show that individuals behave rationally and weigh the risks of insect bites against the cost of the ITNs. The optimal voluntary use of ITNs results in predicted incidence rates that closely track the real incidence rates in Latin America. This means that ITNs are effective and could be used to control the spread of the disease by relying on individual decisions rather than centralized policies. Our model shows that to completely eradicate the vector transmission through the voluntary individual use of ITNs, the cost of ITNs should be as low as possible.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Chagas/prevención & control , Enfermedad de Chagas/transmisión , Mordeduras y Picaduras de Insectos/prevención & control , Mosquiteros Tratados con Insecticida/economía , Control de Mosquitos/métodos , Animales , Teoría del Juego , Humanos , Insectos Vectores/efectos de los fármacos , Insecticidas/farmacología , Modelos Teóricos , Rhodnius/efectos de los fármacosRESUMEN
RTS,S/AS01E malaria vaccine safety, effectiveness, and impact will be assessed in pre- and post-vaccine introduction studies, comparing the occurrence of malaria cases and adverse events in vaccinated versus unvaccinated children. Because those comparisons may be confounded by potential year-to-year fluctuations in malaria transmission intensity and malaria control intervention usage, the latter should be carefully monitored to adequately adjust the analyses. This observational cross-sectional study is assessing Plasmodium falciparum parasite prevalence (PfPR) and malaria control intervention usage over nine annual surveys performed at peak parasite transmission. Plasmodium falciparum parasite prevalence was measured by microscopy and nucleic acid amplification test (quantitative PCR) in parallel in all participants, and defined as the proportion of infected participants among participants tested. Results of surveys 1 (S1) and 2 (S2), conducted in five sub-Saharan African countries, including some participating in the Malaria Vaccine Implementation Programme (MVIP), are reported herein; 4,208 and 4,199 children were, respectively, included in the analyses. Plasmodium falciparum parasite prevalence estimated using microscopy varied between study sites in both surveys, with the lowest prevalence in Senegalese sites and the highest in Burkina Faso. In sites located in the MVIP areas (Kintampo and Kombewa), PfPR in children aged 6 months to 4 years ranged from 24.8% to 27.3%, depending on the study site and the survey. Overall, 89.5% and 86.4% of children used a bednet in S1 and S2, of whom 68.7% and 77.9% used impregnated bednets. No major difference was observed between the two surveys in terms of PfPR or use of malaria control interventions.
Asunto(s)
Malaria/prevención & control , Malaria/transmisión , África del Sur del Sahara , Antimaláricos/economía , Antimaláricos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Mosquiteros Tratados con Insecticida/economía , Malaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Malaria/economía , Modelos Económicos , Salud PúblicaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Two billion long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) have been procured for malaria control. A functional LLIN is one that is present, is in good physical condition, and remains insecticidal, thereby providing protection against vector-borne diseases through preventing bites and killing disease vectors. The World Health Organization (WHO) prequalifies LLINs that remain adequately insecticidal 3 years after deployment. Therefore, institutional buyers often assume that prequalified LLINs are functionally identical with a 3-year lifespan. We measured the lifespans of 3 LLIN products, and calculated their cost per year of functional life, to demonstrate the economic and public health importance of procuring the most cost-effective LLIN product based on its lifespan. METHODS AND FINDINGS: A randomised double-blinded trial of 3 pyrethroid LLIN products (10,571 nets in total) was conducted at 3 follow-up points: 10 months (August-October 2014), 22 months (August-October 2015), and 36 months (October-December 2016) among 3,393 households in Tanzania using WHO-recommended methods. Primary outcome was LLIN functional survival (LLIN present and in serviceable condition). Secondary outcomes were (1) bioefficacy and chemical content (residual insecticidal activity) and (2) protective efficacy for volunteers sleeping under the LLINs (bite reduction and mosquitoes killed). Median LLIN functional survival was significantly different between the 3 net products (p = 0.001): 2.0 years (95% CI 1.7-2.3) for Olyset, 2.5 years (95% CI 2.2-2.8) for PermaNet 2.0 (hazard ratio [HR] 0.73 [95% CI 0.64-0.85], p = 0.001), and 2.6 years (95% CI 2.3-2.8) for NetProtect (HR = 0.70 [95% CI 0.62-0.77], p < 0.001). Functional survival was affected by accumulation of holes, leading to users discarding nets. Protective efficacy also significantly differed between products as they aged. Equivalent annual cost varied between US$1.2 (95% CI $1.1-$1.4) and US$1.5 (95% CI $1.3-$1.7), assuming that each net was priced identically at US$3. The 2 longer-lived nets (PermaNet and NetProtect) were 20% cheaper than the shorter-lived product (Olyset). The trial was limited to only the most widely sold LLINs in Tanzania. Functional survival varies by country, so the single country setting is a limitation. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that LLIN functional survival is less than 3 years and differs substantially between products, and these differences strongly influence LLIN value for money. LLIN tendering processes should consider local expectations of cost per year of functional life and not unit price. As new LLIN products come on the market, especially those with new insecticides, it will be imperative to monitor their comparative durability to ensure that the most cost-effective products are procured for malaria control.
Asunto(s)
Mosquiteros Tratados con Insecticida/economía , Insecticidas/economía , Control de Mosquitos/métodos , Animales , Culicidae/efectos de los fármacos , Vectores de Enfermedades , Composición Familiar , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Resistencia a los Insecticidas/efectos de los fármacos , Mosquiteros Tratados con Insecticida/tendencias , Insecticidas/farmacología , Malaria/prevención & control , Control de Mosquitos/economía , Mosquitos Vectores/efectos de los fármacos , Piretrinas/farmacología , Tanzanía/epidemiologíaAsunto(s)
Betacoronavirus , Servicios de Salud Comunitaria/organización & administración , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Enfermedades Endémicas/prevención & control , Malaria/epidemiología , Malaria/prevención & control , Plasmodium , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , África del Sur del Sahara/epidemiología , COVID-19 , Niño , Servicios de Salud Comunitaria/economía , Infecciones por Coronavirus/economía , Infecciones por Coronavirus/virología , Enfermedades Endémicas/economía , Femenino , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Mosquiteros Tratados con Insecticida/economía , Inversiones en Salud , Malaria/economía , Malaria/mortalidad , Pandemias/economía , Neumonía Viral/economía , Neumonía Viral/virología , Embarazo , SARS-CoV-2 , Organización Mundial de la SaludRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) are one of the most cost-effective measures for preventing malaria. The World Health Organization recommends both large-scale mass distribution campaigns and continuous distributions (CD) as part of a multifaceted strategy to achieve and sustain universal access to ITNs. A combination of these strategies has been effective for scaling up ITN access. For policy makers to make informed decisions on how to efficiently implement CD or combined strategies, information on the costs and cost-effectiveness of these delivery systems is necessary, but relatively few published studies of the cost continuous distribution systems exist. METHODS: To address the gap in continuous distribution cost data, four types of delivery systems-CD through antenatal care services (ANC) and the expanded programme on immunization (EPI) (Ghana, Mali, and mainland Tanzania), CD through schools (Ghana and mainland Tanzania), and a combined community/health facility-based distribution (Zanzibar, Tanzania), as well as mass distributions (Mali)-were costed. Data on costs were collected retrospectively from financial and operational records, stakeholder interviews, and resource use surveys. RESULTS: Overall, from a full provider perspective, mass distributions and continuous systems delivered ITNs at overlapping economic costs per net distributed (mass distributions: 4.37-4.61 USD, CD channels: 3.56-9.90 USD), with two of the school-based systems and the mass distributions at the lower end of this range. From the perspective of international donors, the costs of the CD systems were, for the most part, less costly than the mass distributions (mass distributions: 4.34-4.55 USD, Ghana and Tanzania 2017 school-based: 3.30-3.69 USD, health facility-based: 3.90-4.55 USD, combined community/health facility 4.55 USD). The 2015 school-based distribution (7.30 USD) and 2016 health facility-based distribution (6.52 USD) programmes in Tanzania were an exception. Mass distributions were more heavily financed by donors, while CD relied more extensively on domestic resource contributions. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that CD strategies can continue to deliver nets at a comparable cost to mass distributions, especially from the perspective of the donor.
Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud/economía , Mosquiteros Tratados con Insecticida/economía , Malaria/prevención & control , Control de Mosquitos/economía , África del Sur del Sahara , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Atención a la Salud/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Mosquiteros Tratados con Insecticida/provisión & distribución , Control de Mosquitos/instrumentación , Embarazo , Mujeres Embarazadas , Salud Pública/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) are the most sustainable and effective malaria control tool currently available. Global targets are for 80% of the population living in malaria endemic areas to have access to (own) and use a LLIN. However, current access to LLINs in endemic areas is 56% due to system inefficiencies and budget limitations. Thus, cost-effective approaches to maximize access to effective LLINs in endemic areas are required. This study evaluated whether LLINs that had been stored for 5 years under manufacturer's recommended conditions may be optimally effective against Anopheles mosquitoes, to inform malaria control programmes and governments on the periods over which LLINs may be stored between distributions, in an effort to maximize use of available LLINs. METHODS: Standard World Health Organization (WHO) bioassays (cone and tunnel test) were used to evaluate the bio-efficacy and wash resistance of Olyset® and DawaPlus® 2.0 (rebranded Tsara® Soft) LLINs after 5 years of storage at 25 °C to 33.4 °C and 40% to 100% relative humidity. In addition, a small scale Ifakara Ambient Chamber test (I-ACT) was conducted to compare the bio-efficacy of one long stored LLINs to one new LLIN of the same brand, washed or unwashed. LLINs were evaluated using laboratory reared fully susceptible Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto (s.s.) (Ifakara strain) and pyrethroid resistant Anopheles arabiensis (Kingani strain). RESULTS: After 5 years of storage, both unwashed and washed, Olyset® and DawaPlus® 2.0 (Tsara® Soft) LLINs passed WHO bio-efficacy criteria on knockdown (KD60) ≥ 95%, 24-h mortality ≥ 80% and ≥ 90% blood-feeding inhibition in WHO assays against susceptible An. gambiae s.s. DawaPlus® 2.0 LLINs also passed combined WHO bioassay criteria against resistant An. arabiensis. Confirmatory I-ACT tests using whole nets demonstrated that long-stored LLINs showed higher efficacy than new LLINs on both feeding inhibition and mortality endpoints against resistant strains. CONCLUSIONS: Even after long-term storage of around 5 years, both Olyset® and DawaPlus® 2.0 LLINs remain efficacious against susceptible Anopheles mosquitoes at optimal storage range of 25 °C to 33.4 °C for temperature and 40% to 100% relative humidity measured by standard WHO methods. DawaPlus® 2.0 (Tsara® Soft) remained efficacious against resistant strain.
Asunto(s)
Anopheles , Mosquiteros Tratados con Insecticida/normas , Insecticidas , Control de Mosquitos/instrumentación , Animales , Bioensayo , Femenino , Mosquiteros Tratados con Insecticida/economía , Mosquiteros Tratados con Insecticida/provisión & distribución , Factores de Tiempo , Organización Mundial de la SaludRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) are designed to survive and sustain their physical barrier for 3 years in household conditions. However, studies have shown that most of these nets are usually torn or no longer present in the households in less than 3 years. This study was initiated in Benin to compare the survivorship and physical integrity of seven types of LLINs in a same socio-geographic area. METHODS: In August 2017, 1890 households were selected in 9 villages in the municipality of Zagnanado in central Benin. Each one of the selected households received one of the seven LLIN products: Aspirational®, DawaPlus® 2.0, OlysetNet®, PermaNet® 2.0, PermaNet® 3.0, Royal Sentry® and Yorkool®. Overall, 270 LLINs of each type were freely distributed in Zagnanado, at a rate of 30 LLINs per type per village. These bed nets have been monitored and evaluated every 6 months to identify the most resilient and preferred LLINs in the community. Net survivorship was assessed using the rate of net loss and physical condition. RESULTS: The survivorship of all types of LLIN was estimated at 92% (95% CI 90.33-92.96) after 6 months and 70% (95% CI 67.25-71.81) after a year of use. At 12 months, all bed nets monitored were below the NetCalc model threshold of 92.8% for an LLIN with a lifespan of 3 years. Only 1.73% of all types of LLIN had a visible loss of integrity after 6 months with a median proportionate hole index (PHI) estimated at zero. The percentage significantly increased after 12 months with 10.41% of damaged nets (all types of LLINs). The median PHI for each brand of net was 23, 196, 141, 23, 23, 121 and 72, respectively for Aspirational®, DawaPlus® 2.0, OlysetNet®, PermaNet® 2.0, PermaNet® 3.0, Royal Sentry® and Yorkool®. A significant difference was noted between the PHI at 6 and 12 months (p < 0.0001). After 12 months, the DawaPlus®2.0, OlysetNet® and Royal Sentry® suffered significantly more damage compared to the others (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The results of this study showed that after a year of use, the survivorship of the 7 LLIN products in households was lower than expected. However, all the LLIN products successfully met WHO standards for physical integrity after 12 months of use. The monitoring continues. The next steps will help to identify the most sustainable LLINs.
Asunto(s)
Mosquiteros Tratados con Insecticida/normas , Malaria/prevención & control , Animales , Benin , Estudios de Cohortes , Composición Familiar , Educación en Salud , Humanos , Consentimiento Informado , Mosquiteros Tratados con Insecticida/clasificación , Mosquiteros Tratados con Insecticida/economía , Mosquiteros Tratados con Insecticida/estadística & datos numéricos , Insecticidas , Nitrilos , Permetrina , Sinergistas de Plaguicidas , Butóxido de Piperonilo , Estudios Prospectivos , Piretrinas , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Expanding access to long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) is difficult if one is limited to government and donor financial resources. Private commercial markets could play a larger role in the continuous distribution of LLINs by offering differentiated LLINs to middle-class Ghanaians. This population segment has disposable income and may be willing to pay for LLINs that meet their preferences. Measuring the willingness-to-pay (WTP) for LLINs with specialty features that appeal to middle-class Ghanaians could help malaria control programmes understand what is the potential for private markets to work alongside fully subsidized LLIN distribution channels to assist in spreading this commodity. METHODS: This study conducted a discrete choice experiment (DCE) including a real payment choice among a representative sample of 628 middle-income households living in Ashanti, Greater Accra, and Western regions in Ghana. The DCE presented 18 paired combinations of LLIN features and various prices. Respondents indicated which LLIN of each pair they preferred and whether they would purchase it. To validate stated willingness-to-pay, each participant was given a cash payment of $14.30 (GHS 65) that they could either keep or immediately spend on one of the LLIN products. RESULTS: The households' average probability of purchasing a LLIN with specialty features was 43.8% (S.D. 0.07) and WTP was $7.48 (GHS34.0). The preferred LLIN features were conical or rectangular one-point-hang shape, queen size, and zipper entry. The average WTP for a LLIN with all the preferred features was $18.48 (GHS 84). In a scenario with the private LLIN market, the public sector outlay could be reduced by 39% and private LLIN sales would generate $8.1 million ($311 per every 100 households) in revenue in the study area that would support jobs for Ghanaian retailers, distributors, and importers of LLINs. CONCLUSION: Results support a scenario in which commercial markets for LLINs could play a significant role in improving access to LLINs for middle-income Ghanaians. Manufacturers interested could offer LLIN designs with features that are most highly valued among middle-income households in Ghana and maintain a retail price that could yield sufficient economic returns.
Asunto(s)
Artículos Domésticos/economía , Renta/clasificación , Mosquiteros Tratados con Insecticida/economía , Malaria/prevención & control , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Conducta de Elección , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Ghana , Humanos , Mosquiteros Tratados con Insecticida/clasificación , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Población Rural , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Población Urbana , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Malaria is a public health burden and a major cause for morbidity and mortality in Ethiopia. Malaria also places a substantial financial burden on families and Ethiopia's national economy. Economic evaluations, with evidence on equity and financial risk protection (FRP), are therefore essential to support decision-making for policymakers to identify best buys amongst possible malaria interventions. The aim of this study is to estimate the expected health and FRP benefits of universal public financing of key malaria interventions in Ethiopia. METHODS: Using extended cost-effectiveness analysis (ECEA), the potential health and FRP benefits were estimated, and their distributions across socio-economic groups, of publicly financing a 10% coverage increase in artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT), long-lasting insecticide-treated bed nets (LLIN), indoor residual spraying (IRS), and malaria vaccine (hypothetical). RESULTS: ACT, LLIN, IRS, and vaccine would avert 358, 188, 107 and 38 deaths, respectively, each year at a net government cost of $5.7, 16.5, 32.6, and 5.1 million, respectively. The annual cost of implementing IRS would be two times higher than that of the LLIN interventions, and would be the main driver of the total costs. The averted deaths would be mainly concentrated in the poorest two income quintiles. The four interventions would eliminate about $4,627,800 of private health expenditures, and the poorest income quintiles would see the greatest FRP benefits. ACT and LLINs would have the largest impact on malaria-related deaths averted and FRP benefits. CONCLUSIONS: ACT, LLIN, IRS, and vaccine interventions would bring large health and financial benefits to the poorest households in Ethiopia.
Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos/uso terapéutico , Artemisininas/uso terapéutico , Mosquiteros Tratados con Insecticida/economía , Insecticidas/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra la Malaria , Malaria/economía , Antiinfecciosos/economía , Artemisininas/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Etiopía/epidemiología , Gastos en Salud , Humanos , Incidencia , Renta/clasificación , Malaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Malaria/epidemiología , Malaria/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la Malaria/economía , Factores de Riesgo , Factores SocioeconómicosRESUMEN
Insecticide-treated nets are one of two core vector control interventions recommended by the World Health Organization for deployment in malaria-endemic regions around the world, especially sub-Saharan Africa. Although there are many factors that influence the type of distribution strategy chosen, among the most important considerations for the type of distribution strategy chosen is cost, both in terms of total expenditure required and in terms of relative cost-effectiveness. This research attempted to inform these decisions by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature on the cost and cost-effectiveness of ITN distribution. The analysis compared the relative cost and cost-effectiveness of distribution strategies. Findings suggest that mass campaigns have lower average distribution costs per net compared with continuous/health facility distribution or sale/vouchers, although the relationship between distribution channel and cost were not statistically significant in the multivariate regression models. Continuous/health facility distribution channels were found to be more cost-effective than mass campaigns for averting DALYs, death, and cases of malaria. Those who design and budget for malaria programs should base decisions about distribution channels more on operational and epidemiological considerations than on cost per net, as the costs per net between distribution channels are not statistically different.
Asunto(s)
Mosquiteros Tratados con Insecticida/economía , Insecticidas/farmacología , Malaria/epidemiología , Malaria/prevención & control , Control de Mosquitos/métodos , África del Sur del Sahara/epidemiología , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , HumanosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim is to compare the cost-effectiveness of two long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) delivery models (standard vs. new) in universal coverage (UC) campaigns in rural Mozambique. RESULTS: The total financial cost of delivering LLINs was US$ 231,237.30 and US$ 174,790.14 in the intervention (302,648 LLINs were delivered) and control districts (219,613 LLINs were delivered), respectively. The average cost-effectiveness ratio (ACER) per LLIN delivered and ACER per household (HH) achieving UC was lower in the intervention districts. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per LLIN and ICER per HH reaching UC were US$ 0.68 and US$ 2.24, respectively. Both incremental net benefit (for delivered LLIN and for HHs reaching UC) were positive (intervention deemed cost-effective). Overall, the newer delivery model was the more cost-effective intervention. However, the long-term sustainability of either delivery models is far from guaranteed in Mozambique's current economic context.
Asunto(s)
Mosquiteros Tratados con Insecticida/economía , Malaria/prevención & control , Control de Mosquitos/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Estudios Transversales , Composición Familiar , Humanos , Mozambique , Población RuralRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In 2010, Uganda Malaria Control Programme distributed cost-free mosquito bed nets to households with children under-five years and pregnant women in selected sub-counties. We assessed the factors associated with sleeping under costfree mosquito nets among children under-five years in Nyakayojo sub-county, Mbarara District, Uganda. METHODS: 381 households with at least a child under-five years and benefited from cost-free bed nets in Nyakayojo were randomly selected. Caregivers of children were interviewed using a questionnaire. RESULTS: 74% children slept under bed nets a night before the study. Children from households with ≥2 nets [aOR=1.75; 95% CI: 1.09-2.81, p=0.02], female caregiver [aOR=2.11; 95% CI: 1.16-3.79, p=0.01] and children from households that did not face problems (skin irritation, torn nets, suffocation, night sweating, nasal congestion and candle fire) when sleeping under bed nets [aOR=1.81; 95% CI: 1.10-2.98, p=0.02] were more likely to use nets. Main reason for not sleeping under a net was damage to the net (47.1%). CONCLUSION: The proportion of children sleeping under nets was comparable to MDG target. Improvements in use of mosquito nets by children can be achieved through increasing number of nets in a household.
Asunto(s)
Mosquiteros Tratados con Insecticida/provisión & distribución , Malaria/prevención & control , Control de Mosquitos/métodos , Mosquiteros/estadística & datos numéricos , Propiedad/estadística & datos numéricos , Preescolar , Estudios Transversales , Composición Familiar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Mosquiteros Tratados con Insecticida/economía , Masculino , Control de Mosquitos/economía , Factores Socioeconómicos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Uganda/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Sleeping under insecticide-treated mosquito nets/long-lasting insecticidal nets (ITNs/LLINs henceforth referred to as ITNs) is one of the core interventions recommended by the World Health Organization to reduce malaria transmission and prevent malaria in high-risk communities, such as migrants, by preventing mosquito bites. The malaria burden among the migrant population is a big challenge for malaria elimination in Myanmar. In this context, this study aimed to assess the ownership and utilization of ITNs and to understand the barriers to distribution and utilization of ITNs among the high-risk migrant communities in the Regional Artemisinin Resistance Initiative (RAI) project areas of Myanmar. METHODS: A sequential mixed methods study (quantitative component: cross-sectional study involving analysis of secondary data available from a survey conducted among migrant households in the RAI project areas of Myanmar in 2016 followed by a descriptive qualitative component in 2018). A total of 17 focus group discussions (involving 121 participants) with different groups of migrants and 17 key-informant interviews with key programme stakeholders were conducted in 4 selected townships of RAI project areas. RESULTS: Of 3230 migrant households, 63.3% had at least one ITN while 36% had sufficient ITNs (i.e., 1 ITN per 2 persons). Regarding ITN utilization, about 52% of household members reported sleeping under an ITN the previous night, which is similar among under-fives and pregnant women. Over half of all bed nets were ITNs, with nearly one-third having holes or already undergone repairs. The qualitative findings revealed that the key challenges for ITN utilization were insufficient ITNs in households and dislike of ITNs. The barriers to ITN distribution were incomplete migrant mapping due to resource constraints (time, money, manpower) and difficulties in transportation and carrying ITNs. CONCLUSION: This study highlights poor ownership and utilization of ITNs among migrants in the RAI project areas of Myanmar and barriers to their ownership and utilization. To achieve universal coverage and utilization, more programmatic support by the programme is needed to carry out complete migrant mapping and continuous ITN distribution in remote locations.
Asunto(s)
Mosquiteros Tratados con Insecticida/estadística & datos numéricos , Malaria/prevención & control , Control de Mosquitos/instrumentación , Migrantes , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Preescolar , Estudios Transversales , Composición Familiar , Femenino , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Mosquiteros Tratados con Insecticida/economía , Malaria/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mianmar/epidemiología , Propiedad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Cobertura Universal del Seguro de Salud , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Insecticide-treated net (ITN) durability, measured through physical integrity and bioefficacy, must be accurately assessed in order to plan the timely replacement of worn out nets and guide procurement of longer-lasting, cost-effective nets. World Health Organization (WHO) guidance advises that new intervention class ITNs be assessed 3 years after distribution, in experimental huts. In order to obtain information on whole-net efficacy cost-effectively and with adequate replication, a new bioassay, the Ifakara Ambient Chamber Test (I-ACT), a semi-field whole net assay baited with human host, was compared to established WHO durability testing methods. METHODS: Two experiments were conducted using pyrethroid-susceptible female adult Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto comparing bioefficacy of Olyset®, PermaNet® 2.0 and NetProtect® evaluated by I-ACT and WHO cone and tunnel tests. In total, 432 nets (144/brand) were evaluated using I-ACT and cone test. Olyset® nets (132/144) that did not meet the WHO cone test threshold criteria (≥ 80% mortality or ≥ 95% knockdown) were evaluated using tunnel tests with threshold criteria of ≥ 80% mortality or ≥ 90% feeding inhibition for WHO tunnel and I-ACT. Pass rate of nets tested by WHO combined standard WHO bioassays (cone/tunnel tests) was compared to pass in I-ACT only by net brand and time after distribution. RESULTS: Overall, more nets passed WHO threshold criteria when tested with I-ACT than with standard WHO bioassays 92% vs 69%, (OR: 4.1, 95% CI 3.5-4.7, p < 0.0001). The proportion of Olyset® nets that passed differed if WHO 2005 or WHO 2013 LN testing guidelines were followed: 77% vs 71%, respectively. Based on I-ACT results, PermaNet® 2.0 and NetProtect® demonstrated superior mortality and non-inferior feeding inhibition to Olyset® over 3 years of field use in Tanzania. CONCLUSION: Ifakara Ambient Chamber Test may have use for durability studies and non-inferiority testing of new ITN products. It measures composite bioefficacy and physical integrity with both mortality and feeding inhibition endpoints, using fewer mosquitoes than standard WHO bioassays (cone and tunnel tests). The I-ACT is a high-throughput assay to evaluate ITN products that work through either contact toxicity or feeding inhibition. I-ACT allows mosquitoes to interact with a host sleeping underneath a net as encountered in the field, without risk to human participants.
Asunto(s)
Bioensayo/métodos , Mosquiteros Tratados con Insecticida/normas , Animales , Anopheles , Bioensayo/normas , Femenino , Humanos , Mosquiteros Tratados con Insecticida/economía , Malaria/prevención & control , Control de Mosquitos/métodos , Piretrinas/farmacología , Tanzanía , Organización Mundial de la SaludRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of a program of antimalarial interventions implemented in 2010-2013 in Niger State, Nigeria. DATA SOURCES: Utilization reports from 99 intervention and 51 non-intervention health facilities from the Niger State Malaria Elimination Program, supplemented by data on facility-level characteristics from the Niger State Primary Health Care Development Agency and Local Government Malaria Control units. STUDY DESIGN: Estimated with mixed-effects negative binomial modeling, a difference-in-differences method was used to quantify the impact of the program on the number of febrile illness cases and confirmed malaria cases. Potential confounding factors, non-stationarity, seasonality, and autocorrelation were explicitly accounted for. DATA EXTRACTION METHODS: Data were retrieved from hard copies of utilization reports and manually inputted to create a panel of 5550 facility-month observations. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The program was implemented in two phases. The first phase (August 2010-June 2012) involved the provision of free artemisinin-based combination therapies, long-lasting insecticidal nets, and intermittent preventive treatments. In the second phase (July 2012-March 2013), the program introduced an additional intervention: free parasite-based rapid diagnostic tests. Compared to the pre-intervention period, the average number of monthly febrile illness and malaria cases increased by 20.876 (P < 0.01) and 22.835 (P < 0.01) in the first phase, and by 19.007 (P < 0.05) and 19.681 (P < 0.05) in the second phase, respectively. The results are consistent across different evaluation methods. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that user-fee removal leads to increased utilization of antimalarial services. It motivates future studies to cautiously select their investigative methods.
Asunto(s)
Antimaláricos/uso terapéutico , Artemisininas/uso terapéutico , Programas de Gobierno/organización & administración , Educación en Salud/organización & administración , Malaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Malaria/prevención & control , Antimaláricos/administración & dosificación , Antimaláricos/provisión & distribución , Artemisininas/administración & dosificación , Artemisininas/provisión & distribución , Manejo de Caso/organización & administración , Quimioterapia Combinada , Educación en Salud/economía , Fuerza Laboral en Salud , Humanos , Mosquiteros Tratados con Insecticida/economía , Mosquiteros Tratados con Insecticida/provisión & distribución , Estudios Longitudinales , Malaria/diagnóstico , Modelos Econométricos , Nigeria , Juego de Reactivos para Diagnóstico/economía , Juego de Reactivos para Diagnóstico/provisión & distribuciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Malaria continues to be a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in most countries in Sub-Saharan Africa. Insecticide-treated bed nets (ITNs) is one of the cost-effective interventions for preventing malaria in endemic settings. Ghana has made tremendous efforts to ensure widespread ownership and use of ITNs. However, national coverage statistics can mask important inequities that demand targeted attention. This study assesses the disparities in ownership and utilization of ITNs among reproductive-aged women in a rural impoverished setting of Ghana. METHODS: Population-based cross-sectional data of 3,993 women between the age of 15 and 49 years were collected in seven districts of the Upper East region of Ghana using a two-stage cluster sampling approach. Bivariate and multivariate regression models were used to assess the social, economic and demographic disparities in ownership and utilization of ITN and to compare utilization rates among women in households owning at least one ITN. RESULTS: As high as 79% of respondents were found to own ITN while 62% of ITN owners used them the night preceding the survey. We identified disparities in both ownership and utilization of ITNs in wealth index, occupational status, religion, and district of residence. Respondents in the relative richest wealth quintile were 74% more likely to own ITNs compared to those in the poorest quintile (p-value< 0.001, CI = 1.29-2.34) however, they were 33% less likely to use ITNs compared to the poorest (p-value = 0.01, CI = 0.50-0.91). CONCLUSION: Interventions aimed at preventing and controlling malaria through the use of bed nets in rural Ghana and other similar settings should give more attention to disadvantage populations such as the poor and unemployed. Tailored massages and educational campaigns are required to ensure consistent use of treated bed nets.
Asunto(s)
Mosquiteros Tratados con Insecticida/economía , Mosquiteros Tratados con Insecticida/estadística & datos numéricos , Malaria/prevención & control , Control de Mosquitos/economía , Propiedad , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Demografía , Composición Familiar , Femenino , Ghana/epidemiología , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Malaria/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Población Rural , Factores Socioeconómicos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: While the distribution of mosquito bed nets is a widely adopted approach for malaria prevention, studies exploring how the usage of a net may be influenced by its source and other factors remain sparse. METHODS: A standardized questionnaire and home-visit observations were used to collect data from 9 villages in Budondo sub-county, Uganda in 2016. Household- and individual-level data were collected, such as bed net ownership (at least one net versus none), acquirement source (free versus purchased), demographics, as well as knowledge of malaria and preventative measures. Net-level data, including alternative uses, and bed net quantity and integrity, were also collected. Mixed effects logistic regression models were performed to identify the key determinants of bed net use. RESULTS: Overall, the proportion of households with at least one bed net was 40%, while bed net availability was only reported among 27% of all household members. Awareness of the benefits of bed net use was statistically significantly associated with ownership of at least one net (OR = 1.72, 95% CI 1.11-2.68, p = 0.02). Among those who own net(s), the odds of a bed net being correctly used (i.e., to sleep under) after adjusting for potential confounders were significantly lower for nets that were obtained free compared to nets that were purchased by the owners themselves (OR = 0.33, 95% CI 0.21-0.51, p < 0.01), resulting in an alternative use of the net. Other factors such as female gender, children ≤ 5 years old, and pregnancy status were also significantly associated with having a net to sleep under (all p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Understanding inter- and intra-household net-use factors will help malaria control programmes more effectively direct their efforts to increase public health impact. Future studies may additionally consider socioeconomic status and track the lifetime of the net.
Asunto(s)
Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Mosquiteros Tratados con Insecticida/estadística & datos numéricos , Malaria/prevención & control , Control de Mosquitos/métodos , Propiedad/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Mosquiteros Tratados con Insecticida/economía , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Control de Mosquitos/economía , Uganda , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Using a decision-tree approach, we examined the cost-effectiveness of indoor residual spraying (IRS) of households with insecticide combined with insecticide-treated bed net (ITN) distribution (IRS + ITN), compared with ITN distribution alone in the programmatic context of mainland Tanzania. The primary outcome of our model was the expected economic cost to society per case of malaria averted in children ≤ 5 years of age. Indoor residual spraying of households with insecticide data came from a program implemented in northwest Tanzania from 2008 to 2012; all other data originated from the published literature. Through sensitivity and scenario analyses, the model also examined the effects of variations in insecticide resistance, malaria prevalence, and different IRS modalities. In the base case, IRS + ITN is expected to be more expensive and more effective than the ITN-only intervention (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio [ICER]: $152.36). The number of IRS rounds, IRS insecticide costs, ITN use, malaria prevalence, and the probability that a child develops symptoms following infection drove the interventions' cost-effectiveness. Compared with universal spraying, targeted spraying is expected to lead to a higher number of malaria cases per person targeted (0.211-0.256 versus 0.050-0.076), but the incremental cost per case of malaria averted is expected to be lower (ICER: $41.70). In a scenario of increasing pyrethroid resistance, the incremental expected cost per case of malaria averted is expected to increase compared with the base case (ICER: $192.12). Tanzania should pursue universal IRS only in those regions that report high malaria prevalence. If the cost per case of malaria averted of universal IRS exceeds the willingness to pay, targeted spraying could provide an alternative, but may result in higher malaria prevalence.