Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Tipo de estudio
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Braz. j. otorhinolaryngol. (Impr.) ; Braz. j. otorhinolaryngol. (Impr.);75(6): 866-871, nov.-dez. 2009. graf
Artículo en Inglés, Portugués | LILACS | ID: lil-539385

RESUMEN

As vias aéreas, constituídas por epitélio ciliado e secretor de muco, promovem ao trato respiratório mecanismo de defesa que livra esta superfície das partículas inaladas durante a respiração. É de fundamental importância o entendimento da fisiologia e dos mecanismos envolvidos com a atividade mucociliar. A literatura sugere que o NO, em especial o produzido pela expressão da iNOS, mantém a função mucociliar e a defesa imune da cavidade nasal. Objetivo: Avaliar o envolvimento do NO e das vias enzimáticas da produção do NO no transporte mucociliar, utilizando inibidores da NO sintase constitutiva e indutiva, L-NAME e aminoguanidina, respectivamente. Materiais e métodos: Preparações de palatos de rã foram imersos em soluções de ringer (controle), L-NAME ou aminoguanidina. Os palatos foram imersos nestas soluções por quatro períodos de 15 minutos. Medidas da velocidade do transporte mucociliar foram feitas antes e após cada exposição. Resultos: Palatos controles mantiveram estável a velocidade do transporte. O L-NAME aumentou, enquanto a aminoguanidina reduziu a velocidade de transporte do muco. Conclusão: O bloqueio inespecífico da cNOS com L-NAME e bloqueio relativamente específico da iNOS com aminoguanidina permitiu propor que dependendo da via o NO pode aumentar ou diminuir o transporte mucociliar em palatos de rã.


The airways are made up of ciliated epithelium which secretes mucous, protecting the respiratory tract from particles inhaled during breathing. Its is paramount to understand the physiology and the mechanisms involved in mucociliary activity. Literature suggests that Nitric oxide (NO), especially the one produced by iNOS expression, maintains the mucociliary function and the immune defense of the nasal cavity. AIM: to assess NO participation and the enzymatic pathways in the production of NO and mucociliary transport, using constructive and inductive NO synthetase inhibitors, L-NAME and aminoguanidine, respectively. Materials and methods: frog palates were prepared and immerse in ringer (control), L-NAME or aminoguanidine solutions. The palates were immerse in these solutions for four periods of 15 minutes. Mucociliary transport measures were carried out before and after each exposure. Results: control palates maintained stable their transportation speed. L-NAME increased, while aminoguanidine reduced mucous transportation velocity. Conclusion: unspecific cNOS block with L-NAME and relatively specific iNOS block with aminoguanidine results leads us to propose that depending on the pathway, the NO can increase or reduce mucociliary transport in frog palates.


Asunto(s)
Animales , Depuración Mucociliar/efectos de los fármacos , Mucosa Nasal/enzimología , Óxido Nítrico Sintasa de Tipo II/antagonistas & inhibidores , Óxido Nítrico Sintasa de Tipo III/antagonistas & inhibidores , Óxido Nítrico/fisiología , Anuros , Inhibidores Enzimáticos/farmacología , Guanidinas/farmacología , Depuración Mucociliar/fisiología , NG-Nitroarginina Metil Éster/farmacología , Óxido Nítrico/antagonistas & inhibidores
2.
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol ; 75(6): 866-71, 2009.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20209289

RESUMEN

UNLABELLED: The airways are made up of ciliated epithelium which secretes mucous, protecting the respiratory tract from particles inhaled during breathing. Its is paramount to understand the physiology and the mechanisms involved in mucociliary activity. Literature suggests that Nitric oxide (NO), especially the one produced by iNOS expression, maintains the mucociliary function and the immune defense of the nasal cavity. AIM: to assess NO participation and the enzymatic pathways in the production of NO and mucociliary transport, using constructive and inductive NO synthetase inhibitors, L-NAME and aminoguanidine, respectively. MATERIALS AND METHODS: frog palates were prepared and immersed in ringer (control), L-NAME or aminoguanidine solutions. The palates were immersed in these solutions for four periods of 15 minutes. Mucociliary transport measures were carried out before and after each exposure. RESULTS: control palates maintained stable their transportation speed. L-NAME increased, while aminoguanidine reduced mucous transportation velocity. CONCLUSION: unspecific cNOS block with L-NAME and relatively specific iNOS block with aminoguanidine results leads us to propose that depending on the pathway, the NO can increase or reduce mucociliary transport in frog palates.


Asunto(s)
Depuración Mucociliar/efectos de los fármacos , Mucosa Nasal/enzimología , Óxido Nítrico Sintasa de Tipo III/antagonistas & inhibidores , Óxido Nítrico Sintasa de Tipo II/antagonistas & inhibidores , Óxido Nítrico/fisiología , Animales , Anuros , Inhibidores Enzimáticos/farmacología , Guanidinas/farmacología , Depuración Mucociliar/fisiología , NG-Nitroarginina Metil Éster/farmacología , Óxido Nítrico/antagonistas & inhibidores
3.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health ; 82(5): 603-12, 2009 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19034489

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cytological damage and glutathione peroxidase (GPX) content in the nasal epithelium of residents of Southwest Metropolitan Mexico City (SWMMC) along 1 year of ozone and PM(10) exposure. METHOD: Four nasal scrapings were obtained in 20 volunteers from a control low polluted city and SWMMC permanent residents (n = 20) during 1 year. The scrapings were obtained in September and December 2004, and February and May 2005. One part of the scraping was stained by hematoxylin-eosin technique for cytological evaluation and a second part was stained by immunocytochemistry method to evaluate GPX concentration by morphometry. RESULTS: Control subjects: in total, 30% had no cytological alterations and 70% showed only mild or moderate inflammation in four nasal scrapings. All SWMMC residents showed moderate to severe inflammatory processes in some scrapings. Additionally, dysplasia was found once (in 2 cases) or more than on scraping in five cases (25%). GPX concentration in the control group remained highest in median values throughout the study. SWMMC residents with the highest median values of GPX content were found in the May and September scrapings, and the lowest median values were found in December and February when Ozone and PM(10) levels are increased (P < or = 0.05). A lower GPX content was found as the cytological damage increased (P < or = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Cytological evaluation of nasal epithelium and GPX immunodetection are satisfactory methods to evaluate the earliest damage produced by atmospheric pollution in heavily contaminated cities.


Asunto(s)
Contaminantes Atmosféricos/efectos adversos , Glutatión Peroxidasa/metabolismo , Mucosa Nasal/efectos de los fármacos , Oxidantes Fotoquímicos/efectos adversos , Ozono/efectos adversos , Material Particulado/efectos adversos , Adulto , Ciudades , Femenino , Humanos , Inflamación/inducido químicamente , Inflamación/epidemiología , Inflamación/patología , Masculino , México/epidemiología , Mucosa Nasal/enzimología , Mucosa Nasal/patología , Estaciones del Año , Salud Urbana , Población Urbana , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA