Contemporary maternal and fetal outcomes in the treatment of LQTS during pregnancy: Is nadolol bad for the fetus?

BACKGROUND: ß-Blocker therapy, specifically nadolol, is the recommended treatment for long QT syndrome (LQTS). Previous studies assessing maternal and fetal outcomes were published before the nadolol era. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine contemporary maternal and fetal outcomes in the treatment of LQTS during pregnancy. METHODS: We queried the Inherited Arrhythmia Database at Cleveland Clinic and identified all pregnant patients with LQTS from January 2001 through January 2020. Collected data included use and timing of ß-blockers, maternal arrhythmic events, fetal growth restriction, neonatal hypoglycemia, and bradycardia. RESULTS: Among 68 live-birth pregnancies in 31 women with LQTS (mean age 29 ± 5.9 years; mean corrected QT interval 468 ± 39 ms), there were 5 arrhythmic events in 4 mothers. All arrhythmic events occurred in the postpartum period, and there were no arrhythmic events in patients taking ß-blockers. In patients diagnosed with LQTS and treated with ß-blockers (n = 27 [41%]), nadolol was the most commonly prescribed agent throughout pregnancy and the postpartum period (n = 16 [60%]). The rate of intrauterine growth restriction was not significantly different in fetuses exposed to ß-blockers vs unexposed (P = .08). In the postnatal period, hypoglycemia was not seen and 1 patient in the exposure group had bradycardia. CONCLUSION: Arrhythmic events were only seen in the postpartum period in those not treated with ß-blockers. Events occurred as late as 9 months postpartum. ß-Blocker therapy, specifically nadolol, was not associated with a higher incidence of intrauterine growth restriction. Moreover, neonatal bradycardia was rare and hypoglycemia was not observed.

Outcomes of Patients With Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia Treated With ß-Blockers.

Importance: Patients with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT) may experience life-threatening arrhythmic events (LTAEs) despite ß-blocker treatment. Further complicating management, the role of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) in CPVT is debated. Objective: To investigate the long-term outcomes of patients with RYR2 CPVT treated with ß-blockers only and the cost to benefit ratio of ICD. Design, Settings, and Participants: This prospective cohort study conducted from January 1988 to October 2020 with a mean (SD) follow-up of 9.4 (7.5) years included patients who were referred to the Molecular Cardiology Clinics of ICS Maugeri Hospital, Pavia, Italy. Participants included consecutive patients with CPVT who were carriers of a pathogenic or likely pathogenic RYR2 variant with long-term clinical follow-up. Exposures: Treatment with selective and nonselective ß-blocker only and ICD implant when indicated. Main Outcome and Measures: The main outcome was the occurrence of the first LTAE while taking a ß-blocker. LTAE was defined as a composite of 3 hard end points: sudden cardiac death, aborted cardiac arrest, and hemodynamically nontolerated ventricular tachycardia. Results: The cohort included 216 patients with RYR2 CPVT (121 of 216 female [55%], median [IQR] age 14, [9-30] years). During a mean (SD) follow-up of 9.4 (7.5) years taking ß-blockers only, 28 of 216 patients (13%) experienced an LTAE (annual rate, 1.9%; 95% CI, 1.3-2.7). In multivariable analysis, experiencing either an LTAE (hazard ratio [HR], 3.3; 95% CI, 1.2-8.9; P = .02) or syncope before diagnosis (HR, 4.5; 95% CI, 1.8-11.1; P = .001) and carrying a C-terminal domain variant (HR, 18.1; 95% CI, 4.1-80.8; P < .001) were associated with an increased LTAE risk during ß-blocker therapy only. The risk of LTAE among those taking selective ß-blockers vs nadolol was increased 6-fold (HR, 5.8; 95% CI, 2.1-16.3; P = .001). Conversely, no significant difference was present between propranolol and nadolol (HR, 1.8; 95% CI, 0.4-7.3; P = .44). An ICD was implanted in 79 of 216 patients (37%) who were followed up for a mean (SD) of 8.6 (6.3) years. At the occurrence of LTAE, ICD carriers were more likely to survive (18 of 18 [100%]) than non-ICD carriers (6 of 10 [60%]; P = .01). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, selective ß-blockers were associated with a higher risk of LTAE as compared with nadolol. Independently from treatment, LTAE and syncope before diagnosis and C-terminal domain variants identified patients at higher risk of ß-blocker failure, and the ICD was associated with reduced mortality in high-risk patients with CPVT.

Supraventricular tachycardias in the first year of life: what is the best pharmacological treatment? 24 years of experience in a single centre.

BACKGROUND: Supraventricular tachycardias (SVTs) are common in the first year of life and may be life-threatening. Acute cardioversion is usually effective, with both pharmacological and non-pharmacological procedures. However, as yet no international consensus exists concerning the best drug required for a stable conversion to sinus rhythm (maintenance treatment). Our study intends to describe the experience of a single centre with maintenance drug treatment of both re-entry and automatic SVTs in the first year of life. METHODS: From March 1995 to April 2019, 55 patients under one year of age with SVT were observed in our Centre. The SVTs were divided into two groups: 45 re-entry and 10 automatic tachycardias. As regards maintenance therapy, in re-entry tachycardias, we chose to start with oral flecainide and in case of relapses switched to combined treatment with beta-blockers or digoxin. In automatic tachycardias we first administered a beta-blocker, later combined with flecainide or amiodarone when ineffective. RESULTS: The patients' median follow-up time was 35 months. In re-entry tachycardias, flecainide was effective as monotherapy in 23/45 patients (51.1%) and in 20/45 patients (44.4%) in combination with nadolol, sotalol or digoxin (overall 95.5%). In automatic tachycardias, a beta-blocker alone was effective in 3/10 patients (30.0%), however, the best results were obtained when combined with flecainide: overall 9/10 (90%). CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective study on pharmacological treatment of SVTs under 1 year of age the combination of flecainide and beta-blockers was highly effective in long-term maintenance of sinus rhythm in both re-entry and automatic tachycardias.

ß-Blocker Use and Risk of Mortality in Heart Failure Patients Initiating Maintenance Dialysis.

RATIONAL & OBJECTIVE: Beta-blockers are recommended for patients with heart failure (HF) but their benefit in the dialysis population is uncertain. Beta-blockers are heterogeneous, including with respect to their removal by hemodialysis. We sought to evaluate whether ß-blocker use and their dialyzability characteristics were associated with early mortality among patients with chronic kidney disease with HF who transitioned to dialysis. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Adults patients with chronic kidney disease (aged≥18 years) and HF who initiated either hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis during January 1, 2007, to June 30, 2016, within an integrated health system were included. EXPOSURES: Patients were considered treated with ß-blockers if they had a quantity of drug dispensed covering the dialysis transition date. OUTCOMES: All-cause mortality within 6 months and 1 year or hospitalization within 6 months after transition to maintenance dialysis. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Inverse probability of treatment weights using propensity scores was used to balance covariates between treatment groups. Cox proportional hazard analysis and logistic regression were used to investigate the association between ß-blocker use and study outcomes. RESULTS: 3,503 patients were included in the study. There were 2,115 (60.4%) patients using ß-blockers at transition. Compared with nonusers, the HR for all-cause mortality within 6 months was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.65-0.94) among users of any ß-blocker and 0.68 (95% CI, 0.53-0.88) among users of metoprolol at transition. There were no observed differences in all-cause or cardiovascular-related hospitalization. LIMITATIONS: The observational nature of our study could not fully account for residual confounding. CONCLUSIONS: Beta-blockers were associated with a lower rate of mortality among incident hemodialysis patients with HF. Similar associations were not observed for hospitalizations within the first 6 months following transition to dialysis.

Use of beta-blockers for rosacea-associated facial erythema and flushing: A systematic review and update on proposed mode of action.

BACKGROUND: Flushing and erythema are frequent skin symptoms in rosacea. Because their adequate treatment remains a clinical challenge, new treatment options are explored, such as oral ß-blockers. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of oral ß-blockers for rosacea-associated facial flushing and erythema. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched, including studies providing original data on the efficacy of oral ß-blockers in rosacea patients with facial flushing and/or persistent erythema. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, Newcastle-Ottawa scale, and Quality in Prognosis Studies tool. RESULTS: Nine studies evaluating the use of carvedilol, propranolol, nadolol, and ß-blockers in general were included. Articles studying carvedilol and propranolol showed a large reduction of erythema and flushing during treatment with a rapid onset of symptom control. Bradycardia and hypotension were the most commonly described adverse events. LIMITATIONS: Most studies had a retrospective design with a small sample size, and outcome measurement was often subjective. CONCLUSIONS: Oral ß-blockers could be an effective treatment option for patients with rosacea with facial erythema and flushing that does not respond to conventional therapy. Larger prospective trials with objective outcome assessment are needed to validate the promising results of these studies.

Ventricular arrhythmia suppression with ivabradine in a patient with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia refractory to nadolol, flecainide, and sympathectomy.

Conventional treatment strategies for catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT) include avoidance of strenuous exercise and competitive sports, drugs such as ß-blockers and flecainide and, cervical sympathectomy. An implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) has been utilized if the response to these strategies is inadequate; however, ICD use in CPVT patients, in addition to usual complications, is associated with an increased risk of life-threatening electrical storm. Ivabradine is a selective inhibitor of hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated potassium channel 4 generated funny current (If ), which has been shown to be efficacious in suppression of inappropriate sinus tachycardia, junctional tachycardia, atrial tachycardia, and ventricular ectopy in humans. We report an 18-year-old male with a severe CPVT phenotype refractory to flecainide, nadolol, and sympathectomy who exhibited suppression of ventricular arrhythmias after initiation of ivabradine. These findings are of importance as ivabradine could be an important add-on therapy in CPVT patients who are drug refractory or are unable to continue conventional therapies at the recommended doses.

Protective effect of propranolol and nadolol on social defeat-induced behavioral impairments in rats.

Benzodiazepines and SSRIs are considered as standard treatment options for anxiety and depression, hallmarks of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), although their use is often limited by adverse effects. While promising evidence emerged with ß-adrenergic receptor (ß-AR) antagonists (or 'ß-blockers') and PTSD relief, efficacy issues dampened the excitement. However, we believe it is premature to completely eliminate a beneficial role of ß-blockers. Our previous work has suggested that social defeat (SD) results in anxiety-like and depression-like behaviors in rats. Here, using the SD paradigm, we examined the effect of several ß-adrenergic receptor antagonists (propranolol, nadolol, bisoprolol) on these behaviors in rats. Following acclimatization, Sprague-Dawley rats received no treatment (for control groups) or treated with ; propranolol (50 mg/kg/day in water), or nadolol (18 mg/kg/day in rats' chow), or bisoprolol (15 mg/kg/day in water). The treatment lasted for 36 days, following which rats were subjected to SD/control exposures (1 week). Later, anxiety-like and depression-like behaviors, social interaction and learning-memory function tests were conducted. SD rats exhibited anxiety- and depression-like behavior as well as learning-memory impairment. Propranolol and nadolol protected SD rats from exhibiting anxiety-or depression-like behaviors. Bisoprolol treatment did not mitigate SD-induced behavioral impairments in rats. Nadolol, propranolol or bisoprolol have no effect in attenuating SD-induced memory function tests. These results suggest that certain 'ß-blockers' have the potential to mitigate the negative psychological effects of traumatic events.

Syncope in a Child with Pulmonary Hypertension and Positive Gene Tests for Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia and Long QT Syndrome.

We present a 10-year-old boy with syncope who was found to have long-QT syndrome and severe Pulmonary Hypertension (PH) both in the absence of a secondary cause; to our knowledge, this is the first report with this unusual coexistence. His genetic tests were positive for hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia and Long QT Syndrome (LQTS) without any family history of PH or LQTS. We demonstrated that digital subtraction pulmonary angiography was more useful compared to CT angiogram to demonstrate pulmonary vascular changes which correlated with a noresponse to acute vasoreactivity testing during right heart catheterization. He has been stable for the last 2 years on Ambrisentan, Sildenafil, and Nadolol without recurrence of symptoms.

A large deletion in RYR2 exon 3 is associated with nadolol and flecainide refractory catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia.

We report a 17-year-old boy with a large RYR2 exon 3 deletion who has a severe catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT) phenotype characterized by refractoriness to both nadolol and flecainide which has previously not been reported in this subgroup of CPVT patients. Treatment options in a patient like ours are therefore limited and sympathectomy and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation should be considered early in the treatment course as was done in this patient. In contrast to other CPVT patients who do not usually have structural cardiac abnormalities, these patients are at a high risk of developing left ventricular noncompaction or dilated cardiomyopathy and therefore might benefit from cardiac imaging at regular intervals.

Carvedilol versus traditional, non-selective beta-blockers for adults with cirrhosis and gastroesophageal varices.

BACKGROUND: Non-selective beta-blockers are recommended for the prevention of bleeding in people with cirrhosis, portal hypertension and gastroesophageal varices. Carvedilol is a non-selective beta-blocker with additional intrinsic alpha1-blocking effects, which may be superior to traditional, non-selective beta-blockers in reducing portal pressure and, therefore, in reducing the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. OBJECTIVES: To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of carvedilol compared with traditional, non-selective beta-blockers for adults with cirrhosis and gastroesophageal varices. SEARCH METHODS: We combined searches in the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary's Controlled Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, and Science Citation Index with manual searches. The last search update was 08 May 2018. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised clinical trials comparing carvedilol versus traditional, non-selective beta-blockers, irrespective of publication status, blinding, or language. We included trials evaluating both primary and secondary prevention of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in adults with cirrhosis and verified gastroesophageal varices. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Three review authors (AZ, RJ and LH), independently extracted data. The primary outcome measures were mortality, upper gastrointestinal bleeding and serious adverse events. We undertook meta-analyses and presented results using risk ratios (RR) or mean differences (MD), both with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and I2 values as a marker of heterogeneity. We assessed bias control using the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary domains and the quality of the evidence with GRADE. MAIN RESULTS: Eleven trials fulfilled our inclusion criteria. One trial did not report clinical outcomes. We included the remaining 10 randomised clinical trials, involving 810 participants with cirrhosis and oesophageal varices, in our analyses. The intervention comparisons were carvedilol versus propranolol (nine trials), or nadolol (one trial). Six trials were of short duration (mean 6 (range 1 to 12) weeks), while four were of longer duration (13.5 (6 to 30) months). Three trials evaluated primary prevention; three evaluated secondary prevention; while four evaluated both primary and secondary prevention. We classified all trials as at 'high risk of bias'. We gathered mortality data from seven trials involving 507 participants; no events occurred in four of these. Sixteen of 254 participants receiving carvedilol and 19 of 253 participants receiving propranolol or nadolol died (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.53; I2 = 0%, low-quality evidence). There appeared to be no differences between carvedilol versus traditional, non-selective beta-blockers and the risks of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.37; 810 participants; 10 trials; I2 = 45%, very low-quality evidence) and serious adverse events (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.42; 810 participants; 10 trials; I2 = 14%, low-quality evidence). Significantly more deaths, episodes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding and serious adverse events occurred in the long-term trials but there was not enough information to determine whether there were differences between carvedilol and traditional, non-selective beta-blockers, by trial duration. There was also insufficient information to detect differences in the effects of these interventions in trials evaluating primary or secondary prevention. There appeared to be no differences in the risk of non-serious adverse events between carvedilol versus its comparators (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.23 to 1.29; 596 participants; 6 trials; I2 = 88%; very low-quality evidence). Use of carvedilol was associated with a greater reduction in hepatic venous pressure gradient than traditional, non-selective beta-blockers both in absolute (MD -1.75 mmHg, 95% CI -2.60 to -0.89; 368 participants; 6 trials; I2 = 0%; low-quality evidence) and percentage terms (MD -8.02%, 95% CI -11.49% to -4.55%; 368 participants; 6 trials; I2 = 0%; low-quality evidence). However, we did not observe a concomitant reduction in the number of participants who failed to achieve a sufficient haemodynamic response (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.02; 368 participants; 6 trials; I2 = 42%; very low-quality evidence) or in clinical outcomes. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We found no clear beneficial or harmful effects of carvedilol versus traditional, non-selective beta-blockers on mortality, upper gastrointestinal bleeding, serious or non-serious adverse events despite the fact that carvedilol was more effective at reducing the hepatic venous pressure gradient. However, the evidence was of low or very low quality, and hence the findings are uncertain. Additional evidence is required from adequately powered, long-term, double-blind, randomised clinical trials, which evaluate both clinical and haemodynamic outcomes.

Taquicardia ventricular polimórfica catecolaminérgica com necessidade de implante de cardiodesfibrilador implantável (CDI): Um relato de caso / Ventricular Catecolaminergic Polymorphic Tachycardia (VCPT) with ICD implantation requirement: A case report

Relato de caso de uma paciente do sexo feminino, com 16 anos de idade à ocasião de sua admissão no Instituto de Cardiologia. A mesma foi encaminhada por serviço de saúde externo devido a síncopes durante atividade física e foi submetida à investigação, com diagnóstico final de taquicardia ventricular catecolaminérgica. Após a definição diagnóstica, foi realizado tratamento medicamentoso com betabloqueador, sendo necessário o implante de marcapasso definitivo por conta da incompetência cronotrópica secundária ao tratamento farmacológico instituído. Posteriormente, por persistência das arritmias ventriculares mesmo com o uso de terapia otimizada, optou-se por realizar um implante de CDI

Case report of a 16-year-old female patient at the time of her admission to the Institute of Cardiology. She was referred by an external healthcare service due to syncope during physical activity and was submitted to the investigation with a final diagnosis of catecholaminergic ventricular tachycardia. Once the diagnosis was established, the patient was administered a beta-blocker and definitive pacemaker implant was required due to chronotropic incompetence secondary to drug therapy. Subsequently, due to the persistence of ventricular arrhythmias despite the use of optimized therapy, we decided to implant an ICD

Efficacy of ivabradine to control ventricular arrhythmias in catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia.

Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT) is a potentially lethal hereditary disease characterized by complex ventricular arrhythmias provoked by exercise or emotional stress and by a high mortality rate in young individuals. Nadolol alone or in combination with flecainide is the most effective therapy. However, compliance to treatment is often low due to side effects. We report two patients with CPVT in whom side effects of treatment prompted discontinuation of flecainide or nadolol and in whom ivabradine was successfully added to therapy. In these two patients, ivabradine in combination with nadolol or flecainide was well tolerated and successfully suppressed nonsustained polymorphic ventricular tachycardia and couplets. Thus, ivabradine could limit the use of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators or left cardiac sympathetic denervation in CPVT patients with uncontrollable ventricular arrhythmias.

Síncope en una deportista escolar / Syncope in a school athlete

Se presenta el caso de una niña de diez años que sufrió un síncope durante el esfuerzo y que fue diagnosticada de taquicardia ventricular polimórfica catecolaminérgica. Es una canalopatía arritmógena que puede desencadenar arritmias ventriculares graves y alto riesgo de muerte súbita en pacientes jóvenes con un corazón de estructura normal. El síncope es un problema médico común, con una prevalencia estimada del 40% en la población general. Suele tener una evolución benigna, aunque en un 2-3% también puede relacionarse con eventos cardiacos y ser un síntoma de posibilidad de muerte súbita. La anamnesis es esencial para identificar las causas y mecanismos desencadenantes y orientar las pruebas diagnósticas a realizar. En este caso la ergometría fue la prueba diagnóstica, ya que puso en evidencia la arritmia. La decisión sobre la aptitud deportiva será individualizada y dependerá de la etiología del síncope. Se debe establecer el pronóstico y valorar la posibilidad de recurrencias y de muerte súbita y evitar los diagnósticos erróneos tanto de contraindicación como de aptitud deportiva (AU)

We present the case of a 10-year-old girl who suffered syncope during the effort, who was diagnosed with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. It is an arrhythmogenic channelopathy that can trigger severe ventricular arrhythmias and has a high risk of sudden death in young patients witch normal heart structure. Syncope is a common medical problem, with an estimated prevalence of 40% in the general population. It usually has a benign course, although 2-3% can also be related to cardiac events and be a symptom of possibility of sudden death. The anamnesis is essential to identify the causes and trigger mechanisms and guide the diagnostic tests to be performed. In this case, the ergometry was the diagnostic test, since it showed the arrhythmia. The decision about the sport aptitude will be individualized and will depend on the aetiology of the syncope. The prognosis should be established and the possibility of recurrences and sudden death should be assessed and the misdiagnosis of both contraindication and sports aptitude should be avoided (AU)