Renal function deterioration is an independent mortality determinant in Koreans diagnosed with lupus nephritis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the predictors of mortality, mortality rate, and causes of death in patients with lupus nephritis (LN) depending on final renal function. METHODS: The cohort included 401 Korean patients diagnosed with LN between 1985 and 2019. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical and laboratory indices, treatment response, and the final renal function. The final renal function was defined by the last stable level of eGFR measured in an out-patient department more than 3 times before death occurred and was categorized into five groups depending on CKD stage. RESULTS: The median follow-up time after the diagnosis of LN was 131 months. No difference in baseline demographic characteristics and laboratory findings was found except for the proportion of Hb less than 10 mg/dl and baseline eGFR (p = 0.011 and 0.037). We found no significant differences in therapeutic parameters, but all the response parameters including treatment response at 6 months (p = 0.004) and 12 months (p = 0.004), time to remission (p < 0.001), final renal response (p < 0.001), and the final renal function (p < 0.001) differed significantly between the two groups. In multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis, the final renal function was an independent risk factor predicting mortality. The main causes of death were infection and SLE flare. Contrary to existing knowledge, SLE flare also triggered mortality in a few patients with LN progressed to end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Only two cases of mortality occurred in the kidney transplantation (KT) group (n = 25) with a median follow-up period of 224 months. The overall mortality rates calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method were 6.8%, 10.3%, 19.7%, and 28.0% at 5, 10, 20, and 30 years, respectively. CONCLUSION: Renal function deterioration was an independent determinant of mortality in Korean patients with LN. SLE flare also caused mortality in patients with LN who required maintenance dialysis, suggesting the benefit of KT on lupus activity and survival.

Clinical and laboratory phenotypes in juvenile-onset Systemic Lupus Erythematosus across ethnicities in the UK.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a systemic autoimmune/inflammatory disease. Patients diagnosed with juvenile-onset SLE (jSLE), when compared to individuals with adult-onset SLE, develop more severe organ involvement, increased disease activity and greater tissue and organ damage. In adult-onset SLE, clinical characteristics, pathomechanisms, disease progression and outcomes do not only vary between individuals and age groups, but also ethnicities. However, in children and young people, the influence of ethnicity on disease onset, phenotype and outcome has not been investigated in detail. In this study, we investigated clinical and laboratory characteristics in pediatric SLE patients from different ethnic backgrounds (White Caucasian, Asian, Black African/Caribbean) accessing data from a national cohort of jSLE patients (the UK JSLE Cohort Study). Among jSLE patients in the UK, ethnicity affects both the disease's clinical course and outcomes. At diagnosis, Black African/Caribbean jSLE patients show more "classical" laboratory and clinical features when compared to White Caucasian or Asian patients. Black African/Caribbean jSLE patients exhibit more renal involvement and more frequently receive cyclophosphamide and rituximab. Studies targeting ethnicity-specific contributors to disease expression and phenotypes are necessary to improve our pathophysiological understanding, diagnosis and treatment of jSLE.

Mycophenolate mofetil in the treatment of Chinese patients with lupus nephritis: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis.

BACKGROUD: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has been recommended for the treatment of lupus nephritis (LN). Although inter-racial differences exist regarding the appropriate dose and efficacy of MMF in patients with LN, no definitive meta-analysis has yet been conducted in Chinese patients. This analysis investigated the efficacy and safety of MMF in Chinese patients with proliferative LN. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted to select randomized controlled trials that reported at least one of the following: complete remission (CR), partial remission, total remission (TR; defined as complete remission + partial remission), relapse rate, serum creatinine, creatinine clearance, end-stage renal disease, death, infections, amenorrhea, leukopenia, alopecia, gastrointestinal symptoms, or liver damage. RESULTS: Eighteen trials (927 patients) were included; 14 (750 patients) reported CR, partial remission, and TR. Two trials (58 patients) reported relapse rates during maintenance treatment. MMF induction significantly improved CR and TR vs cyclophosphamide (relative risk 1.34, 95% confidence interval: 1.13-1.58; P < .001; relative risk 1.16, 95% confidence interval: 1.02-1.33; P = .03), and was associated with significantly lower risks of infection (P < .001), amenorrhea (P < .001), leukopenia, and alopecia. No significant difference in relapse rate was evident between the MMF and azathioprine groups (P = .66). CONCLUSION: According to this meta-analysis of 18 trials, MMF is significantly more effective than cyclophosphamide induction, and is associated with reduced incidences of infections, amenorrhea, leukopenia, and alopecia in Chinese patients with proliferative LN.

The Southern California Lupus Registry: I. Baseline characteristics of lupus patients in uncharted territory.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the baseline characteristics of a multi-ethnic systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) cohort in Southern California established with the intent of addressing regional health inequity. METHODS: Patients ≥18 years of age with SLE per the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) criteria were recruited into the Southern California Lupus Registry (SCOLR) if they resided in San Bernardino and Riverside counties in California. Individuals were categorized according to their stated ethnicity as non-Hispanic White, Hispanic, Black, or Asian. Descriptive statistics were utilized for analysis. Predictors of renal disease were assessed by binomial regression. RESULTS: The SCOLR cohort comprised 162 patients: 57 non-Hispanic White, 58 Hispanic, 17 Asian, and 30 Black. A difference in the rate of renal involvement and SLE duration was found among the four ethnic groups. Renal involvement was significantly higher in Hispanics compared with non-Hispanic Whites. CONCLUSION: In line with other cohorts, this study shows greater renal involvement in Hispanics than non-Hispanic Whites, demonstrating a need for more aggressive screening and early intervention to improve long-term outcomes. As a multi-ethnic SLE cohort, the SCOLR serves as a foundation for longitudinal studies addressing health inequity in this region.

Comprehensive aptamer-based screening identifies a spectrum of urinary biomarkers of lupus nephritis across ethnicities.

Emerging urinary biomarkers continue to show promise in evaluating lupus nephritis (LN). Here, we screen urine from active LN patients for 1129 proteins using an aptamer-based platform, followed by ELISA validation in two independent cohorts comprised of 127 inactive lupus, 107 active LN, 67 active non-renal lupus patients and 74 healthy controls, of three different ethnicities. Urine proteins that best distinguish active LN from inactive disease are ALCAM, PF-4, properdin, and VCAM-1 among African-Americans, sE-selectin, VCAM-1, BFL-1 and Hemopexin among Caucasians, and ALCAM, VCAM-1, TFPI and PF-4 among Asians. Most of these correlate significantly with disease activity indices in the respective ethnic groups, and surpass conventional metrics in identifying active LN, with better sensitivity, and negative/positive predictive values. Several elevated urinary molecules are also expressed within the kidneys in LN, based on single-cell RNAseq analysis. Longitudinal studies are warranted to assess the utility of these biomarkers in tracking lupus nephritis.

Outcomes of membranous and proliferative lupus nephritis - analysis of a single-centre cohort with more than 30 years of follow-up.

OBJECTIVES: To compare membranous lupus nephritis (MLN) and proliferative lupus nephritis (PLN) with respect to survival, demographic, clinical and laboratory characteristics; and to investigate predictors of renal and patient survival. METHODS: Single-centre retrospective observational study. Patients with biopsy-proven PLN, MLN and mixed lupus nephritis were included. Groups were compared using appropriate statistical tests and survival was analysed through the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression analysis was performed to investigate predictors of renal and patient survival. RESULTS: A total of 187 patients with biopsy-proven lupus nephritis (135 with PLN, 38 with MLN and 14 with mixed LN) were followed for up to 42 years (median 12 years). There was a higher proportion of MLN amongst Afro-Caribbeans than amongst Caucasians (31% vs 15%, P = 0.010). Patients with MLN had significantly lower anti-dsDNA antibodies (P = 0.001) and higher C3 levels (P = 0.018) at diagnosis. Cumulative renal survival rates at 5, 10, 15 and 20 years were 91, 81, 75 and 66% for PLN and 100, 97, 92 and 84% for MLN, respectively (P = 0.028). Cumulative patient survival at 5, 10, 15 and 20 years was 94, 86, 80 and 76%, with no difference between PLN and MLN. Urinary protein-creatinine ratio above 42 mg/mmol and eGFR below 76 ml/min/1.73 m2, one year after the diagnosis of LN, were the strongest predictors of progression to end-stage renal disease. eGFR below 77 ml/min/1.73 m2, at one year, development of end-stage renal disease and Afro-Caribbean ethnicity were associated with higher mortality. CONCLUSION: Patients with MLN and PLN differ significantly regarding serological profiles and renal survival, suggesting different pathogenesis. Renal function at year one predicts renal and patient survival.

Association of FcγRIIA-R/H131 polymorphism and systemic lupus erythematosus lupus nephritis risk: A meta-analysis.

AIM: Previous studies have discussed association of FcγRIIA-R/H131 polymorphism and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), lupus nephritis (LN) risk. However, conclusions were inconsistent. METHODS: A meta-analysis was performed in this study with allelic contrast (allele R vs H), additive model (genotype RR vs HH), recessive model (genotype RR vs RH + HH), and dominant model (genotype RR + RH vs HH). RESULTS: A total of 33 studies discussed the correlation between FcγRIIA-R/H131 polymorphism and SLE, involving 5652 SLE patients and 6322 controls. Allele R was significantly related to SLE in the overall population (odds ratio [OR] = 1.238, P < .001), Asian (OR = 1.237, P < .001) and European population (OR = 1.212, P = .012). Additive, recessive and dominant models were correlating with SLE in the overall population (OR = 1.448, P < .001; OR = 1.303, P < .001; OR = 1.310, P < .001), Asian population (OR = 1.640, P = .001; OR = 1.437, P < .001; OR = 1.344, P = .005), respectively. In addition, 22 studies evaluated relation of FcγRIIA-R/H131 polymorphism with LN, involving 2065 patients with LN, and 2023 patients without LN. Results showed that allele R and the other 3 models related to LN susceptibility in the overall population when discussing differences of polymorphism between patients with/without LN. We further compared differences of polymorphism between patients with LN and controls, showing that additive and recessive models related to LN risk in the overall population, Asian, European and North American populations. CONCLUSION: In summary, FcγRIIA-R/H131 polymorphism is associated with SLE and LN.

Association of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) genetic susceptibility loci with lupus nephritis in childhood-onset and adult-onset SLE.

OBJECTIVE: LN is one of the most common and severe manifestations of SLE. Our aim was to test the association of SLE risk loci with LN risk in childhood-onset SLE (cSLE) and adult-onset SLE (aSLE). METHODS: Two Toronto-based tertiary care SLE cohorts included cSLE (diagnosed <18 years) and aSLE patients (diagnosed ⩾18 years). Patients met ACR and/or SLICC SLE criteria and were genotyped on the Illumina Multi-Ethnic Global Array or Omni1-Quad arrays. We identified those with and without biopsy-confirmed LN. HLA and non-HLA additive SLE risk-weighted genetic risk scores (GRSs) were tested for association with LN risk in logistic models, stratified by cSLE/aSLE and ancestry. Stratified effect estimates were meta-analysed. RESULTS: Of 1237 participants, 572 had cSLE (41% with LN) and 665 had aSLE (30% with LN). Increasing non-HLA GRS was significantly associated with increased LN risk [odds ratio (OR) = 1.26; 95% CI 1.09, 1.46; P = 0.0006], as was increasing HLA GRS in Europeans (OR = 1.55; 95% CI 1.07, 2.25; P = 0.03). There was a trend for stronger associations between both GRSs and LN risk in Europeans with cSLE compared with aSLE. When restricting cases to proliferative LN, the magnitude of these associations increased for both the non-HLA (OR = 1.30; 95% CI 1.10, 1.52; P = 0.002) and HLA GRS (OR = 1.99; 95% CI 1.29, 3.08; P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: We observed an association between known SLE risk loci and LN risk in children and adults with SLE, with the strongest effect observed among Europeans with cSLE. Future studies will include SLE-risk single nucleotide polymorphisms specific to non-European ancestral groups and validate findings in an independent cohort.

Racial and Ethnic Differences in the Prevalence and Time to Onset of Manifestations of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: The California Lupus Surveillance Project.

OBJECTIVE: The California Lupus Surveillance Project (CLSP) is a population-based registry of individuals with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) residing in San Francisco County, California from 2007 to 2009, with a special focus on Asian/Pacific Islander and Hispanic patients. We used retrospective CLSP data to analyze racial and ethnic differences in lupus manifestations and in the timing and risk of developing severe manifestations. METHODS: A total of 724 patients with SLE were retrospectively identified. Prevalence ratios (PRs) of SLE manifestations were calculated using Poisson regression models stratified by race/ethnicity and adjusted for sex, age at SLE diagnosis, and disease duration. We studied onset of severe SLE manifestations after SLE diagnosis using Kaplan-Meier methods to examine time-to-event and Cox proportional hazards regression models to estimate hazard ratios (HRs). White patients were the referent group in all analyses. RESULTS: African Americans, Asian/Pacific Islanders, and Hispanic patients had increased prevalence of renal manifestations (PR 1.74 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.40-2.16], PR 1.68 [95% CI 1.38-2.05], and PR 1.35 [95% CI 1.05-1.74], respectively). Furthermore, African Americans had increased prevalence of neurologic manifestations (PR 1.49 [95% CI 1.12-1.98]), and both African Americans (PR 1.09 [95% CI 1.04-1.15]) and Asian/Pacific Islanders (PR 1.07 [95% CI 1.01-1.13]) had increased prevalence of hematologic manifestations. African Americans, Asian/Pacific Islanders, and Hispanic patients, respectively, had higher risk of developing lupus nephritis (HR 2.4 [95% CI 1.6-3.8], HR 4.3 [95% CI 2.9-6.4], and HR 2.3 [95% CI 1.4-3.8]) and thrombocytopenia (HR 2.3 [95% CI 1.1-4.4], HR 2.3 [95% CI 1.3-4.2], and HR 2.2 [95% CI 1.1-4.7]). Asian/Pacific Islander and Hispanic patients had higher risk of developing antiphospholipid syndrome (HR 2.5 [95% CI 1.4-4.4] and HR 2.6 [95% CI 1.3-5.1], respectively). CONCLUSION: This is the first epidemiologic study comparing lupus manifestations among 4 major racial and ethnic groups. We found substantial differences in the prevalence of several clinical SLE manifestations among racial/ethnic groups and discovered that African Americans, Asian/Pacific Islanders, and Hispanic patients are at increased risk of developing several severe manifestations following a diagnosis of SLE.

Utility of urinary transferrin and ceruloplasmin in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus for differentiating patients with lupus nephritis. / Transferrina y ceruloplasmina en orina de pacientes con lupus eritematoso sistémico. ¿Son útiles para diferenciar pacientes con nefritis lúpica?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Diagnosis of lupus nephritis (LN) is usually based on renal biopsy, which is an invasive technique that involves multiple risks. Therefore, different biomarkers have emerged as alternatives for the diagnosis of LN. Nonetheless, studies regarding urinary biomarkers in Latin American patients are limited. The objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic value of urinary transferrin and ceruloplasmin to differentiate patients who have renal involvement from those who do not. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients that met the revised American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria were recruited. Patients with another autoimmune disease, active infection (urinary tract or systemic infection), renal replacement therapy, human immunodeficiency virus infection or pregnancy were excluded. A urine sample was collected from each patient. LN was diagnosed according to ACR criteria. The activity and chronicity of LN were measured using the Austin indices. Urinary transferrin and ceruloplasmin levels were measured using commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits. Mann-Whitney U test and Student's t-test were used to compare data. Spearman's rank correlation was used to determine associations. Lastly, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were created. RESULTS: The study involved 120 SLE patients. In all, 85% were female, 76% mestizo, the mean age was 32.8±12.1years and mean systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index (SLEDAI) was 8.4±8.9; 64% had renal involvement. Urinary levels of the two biomarkers were significantly higher in patients with LN compared to those without LN. Similarly, urinary levels of both biomarkers were significantly higher in patients with active LN compared to those with inactive LN. Furthermore, urinary transferrin levels were significantly higher in Afro-Latin American patients. On the other hand, urinary transferrin levels correlated with SLEDAI and proteinuria, and transferrin and ceruloplasmin levels correlated with each other. The diagnostic value of ROC curves for these urinary biomarkers for LN were good. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort of SLE patients, we found that transferrin and ceruloplasmin were potential biomarkers for LN, and can even differentiate active LN.

Association of African-American ethnicity and smoking status with total and individual damage index in systemic lupus erythematosus.

INTRODUCTION: Smoking has been associated with increased incidence, severity of cutaneous lupus, and lupus activity. We looked at the association of both smoking and ethnicity with the individual damage items from the SLICC/ACR Damage Index. METHODS: Poisson regression was used to model the total SLICC/ACR Damage Index score against ever smoking. Cox regression was used to assess the relationship between time to individual damage items and ever smoking. Furthermore, we compared SLICC/ACR Damage Index items among African-American and Caucasian ever smokers. RESULTS: The study included 2629 patients, 52.6% Caucasian and 39.3% African-American. The prevalence of ever smokers was 35.8%. There was no significant difference in total SLICC/ACR Damage Index score between ever smokers and never smokers after adjustment for ethnicity, gender, age at diagnosis, and years of education. Ever smokers had more atherosclerotic cardiovascular damage and skin damage compared to non-smokers. Caucasian SLE patients who ever smoked were more likely to have muscle atrophy and atherosclerosis compared to Caucasian non-smokers. African-American patients who ever smoked were more likely to have skin damage compared to African-American non-smokers. African-Americans who smoked were more likely to have many more damage items (cataract, renal damage, pulmonary hypertension, cardiomyopathy, deforming or erosive arthritis, avascular necrosis, skin damage, and diabetes) compared to Caucasians who smoked. CONCLUSION: Our analysis proved the major effect of smoking on cardiovascular and cutaneous damage. Surprisingly, cardiovascular damage items had higher hazard ratios in Caucasian smokers than non-smokers while skin damage items hazard ratios were higher in African-American smokers compared to non-smokers.Key Points• This study is the largest cohort study to date evaluating the effect of smoking on the cumulative SLICC/ACR Damage Index and its individual damage items.• It is the only study that examined the effect of smoking on individual items of the SLICC/ACR Damage Index in terms of Caucasians vs. African-American ethnicity.• Our analysis proved the major effect of smoking on cardiovascular and cutaneous damage. Compared to non-smokers, Caucasian smokers had higher risk of cardiovascular damage while African-American smokers had more skin damage.• African-Americans who smoked were more likely to have many more damage items (cataract, renal damage, pulmonary hypertension, cardiomyopathy, deforming or erosive arthritis, avascular necrosis, skin damage, and diabetes) compared to Caucasians who smoked.

Individualized decision aid for diverse women with lupus nephritis (IDEA-WON): A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Treatment decision-making regarding immunosuppressive therapy is challenging for individuals with lupus. We assessed the effectiveness of a decision aid for immunosuppressive therapy in lupus nephritis. METHODS AND FINDINGS: In a United States multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial (RCT), adult women with lupus nephritis, mostly from racial/ethnic minority backgrounds with low socioeconomic status (SES), seen in in- or outpatient settings, were randomized to an individualized, culturally tailored, computerized decision aid versus American College of Rheumatology (ACR) lupus pamphlet (1:1 ratio), using computer-generated randomization. We hypothesized that the co-primary outcomes of decisional conflict and informed choice regarding immunosuppressive medications would improve more in the decision aid group. Of 301 randomized women, 298 were analyzed; 47% were African-American, 26% Hispanic, and 15% white. Mean age (standard deviation [SD]) was 37 (12) years, 57% had annual income of <$40,000, and 36% had a high school education or less. Compared with the provision of the ACR lupus pamphlet (n = 147), participants randomized to the decision aid (n = 151) had (1) a clinically meaningful and statistically significant reduction in decisional conflict, 21.8 (standard error [SE], 2.5) versus 12.7 (SE, 2.0; p = 0.005) and (2) no difference in informed choice in the main analysis, 41% versus 31% (p = 0.08), but clinically meaningful and statistically significant difference in sensitivity analysis (net values for immunosuppressives positive [in favor] versus negative [against]), 50% versus 35% (p = 0.006). Unresolved decisional conflict was lower in the decision aid versus pamphlet groups, 22% versus 44% (p < 0.001). Significantly more patients in the decision aid versus pamphlet group rated information to be excellent for understanding lupus nephritis (49% versus 33%), risk factors (43% versus 27%), medication options (50% versus 33%; p ≤ 0.003 for all); and the ease of use of materials was higher in the decision aid versus pamphlet groups (51% versus 38%; p = 0.006). Key study limitations were the exclusion of men, short follow-up, and the lack of clinical outcomes, including medication adherence. CONCLUSIONS: An individualized decision aid was more effective than usual care in reducing decisional conflict for choice of immunosuppressive medications in women with lupus nephritis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02319525.

Lupus nephritis: An update on treatments and pathogenesis.

Immunosuppressive therapies for lupus nephritis (LN) have improved significantly over the past few decades, resulting in growing number of choices for treatment individualization and improved renal and patient outcomes. Corticosteroids combined with mycophenolate or cyclophosphamide induces a satisfactory response in a high proportion of Asian and Caucasian patients, but the rate of improvement varies considerably between patients. Relatively low disease flare rate was observed in Chinese patients receiving low-dose prednisolone and mycophenolate maintenance. Short-term results with calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) are encouraging, attributed both to their immunosuppressive efficacy and the action of these agents on podocyte biology leading to more rapid proteinuria suppression. Additional data, especially on the avoidance of nephrotoxicity and metabolic side effects, is required to facilitate selection of patients appropriate for this treatment. Modifications of standard regimens such as reducing corticosteroid exposure or using enteric-coated mycophenolate might help reduce treatment-related toxicities without compromising efficacy. While clinical outcomes of patients have improved with recent therapeutic advances, individual and ethnic variations in disease manifestations and treatment response, as well as the prevention of infections and long-term complications still present challenges to frontline clinicians. Recent data from histological examination and translational studies also suggest that complement activation via the alternative pathway, immune deposition on renal tubular basement membrane, and local inflammatory responses involving resident kidney cells are of pathogenic relevance in LN. The progress of clinical and translational studies has improved not only the understanding of disease mechanisms but also clinical decision making in the management of LN.

Interferon-λ3/4 genetic variants and interferon-λ3 serum levels are biomarkers of lupus nephritis and disease activity in Taiwanese.

BACKGROUND: Type III interferons (IFNs) or IFN-λs are the newly discovered cytokines that primarily target the cells of epithelial and myeloid lineages, which are major components of kidneys. The current study aimed to investigate whether IFN-λs are involved in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and lupus nephritis. METHODS: TaqMan allele discrimination assays were used to determine IFNL3/4 SNP genotypes of 1620 healthy controls and 1013 SLE patients (two independent cohorts consisting of 831 and 182 subjects, respectively) from Taiwan. The distributions of IFNL3/4 SNP genotypes and allele frequencies were compared between SLE patients and healthy controls and among SLE patients stratified by clinical phenotypes. ELISA was used to determine the serum IFN-λ3 concentrations of SLE patients. RESULTS: All major IFN3/4 SNP alleles were significantly associated with the risk for lupus nephritis (rs8099917T, PFDR = 0.0021, OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.24-2.47; rs12979860C, PFDR = 0.0034, OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.18-2.30; rs4803217C, PFDR = 0.0021, OR 1.76, 95% CI 1.25-2.48; and ss469415590TT, PFDR = 0.0021, OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.23-2.42) among SLE patients. Similarly, the major IFNL3/4 SNP haplotype rs8099917T-ss469415590TT-rs12979860C-rs4803217C (or T-TT-C-C) was a significant risk factor for lupus nephritis (P = 0.0015, OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.22-2.32). Additionally, all minor IFN3/4 SNP alleles were significantly associated with SLE susceptibility in nephritis-negative SLE patients as compared to normal healthy controls (rs8099917G, PFDR = 0.00177, OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.24-2.28; rs12979860T, PFDR = 0.00299, OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.18-2.32; rs4803217A, PFDR = 0.00176, OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.22-2.23; and ss469415590ΔG, PFDR = 0.00176, OR 1.70, 95% CI 1.26-2.29). Furthermore, the elevated serum levels of IFN-λ3 were significantly correlated with the complement depression and the high SLE disease activities in SLE patients. CONCLUSIONS: IFN-λ3/4 genetic variants play a unique role in the development of lupus nephritis and SLE.

Self-Reported Physical Activity Is Associated with Lupus Nephritis in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Data from KORean Lupus Network (KORNET) Registry.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to identify the associations among physical activity, disease activity, and organ damage in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 415 patients with SLE were consecutively enrolled from the KORean lupus Network (KORNET) registry. This registry assessed clinical features, disease activity [Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K)], and organ damage [Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology (SLICC/ACR) Damage Index (SDI)] upon enrollment in the study. Self-reported physical activity was measured by the International Physical Activity Questionnaire. Statistical analyses were conducted using the Mann-Whitney U test and multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: A significant difference in vigorous activity was noted between patients with lupus nephritis (LN) (n=93) and those without LN (n=322) (p=0.012), but not in moderate and walking activities. In contrast, no differences in physical activity, walking, moderate, and vigorous intensity, according to SLEDAI-2K and SDI were found. In addition to younger age (p=0.032), high physical component summary of SF-36 (p=0.004) and SLEDAI-2K (p=0.038), and less vigorous physical activity were associated with LN (p=0.024). However, cardiovascular disease was not associated with physical activity in SLE patients. CONCLUSION: This study showed that patients with LN had less vigorous physical activity than patients without LN. The results suggest that lupus nephritis might be associated with physical activity.

The plasma biomarker soluble SIGLEC-1 is associated with the type I interferon transcriptional signature, ethnic background and renal disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.

BACKGROUND: The molecular heterogeneity of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases has been one of the main obstacles to the development of safe and specific therapeutic options. Here, we evaluated the diagnostic and clinical value of a robust, inexpensive, immunoassay detecting the circulating soluble form of the monocyte-specific surface receptor sialic acid binding Ig-like lectin 1 (sSIGLEC-1). METHODS: We developed an immunoassay to measure sSIGLEC-1 in small volumes of plasma/serum from systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients (n = 75) and healthy donors (n = 504). Samples from systemic sclerosis patients (n = 99) were studied as an autoimmune control. We investigated the correlation between sSIGLEC-1 and both monocyte surface SIGLEC-1 and type I interferon-regulated gene (IRG) expression. Associations of sSIGLEC-1 with clinical features were evaluated in an independent cohort of SLE patients (n = 656). RESULTS: Plasma concentrations of sSIGLEC-1 strongly correlated with expression of SIGLEC-1 on the surface of blood monocytes and with IRG expression in SLE patients. We found ancestry-related differences in sSIGLEC-1 concentrations in SLE patients, with patients of non-European ancestry showing higher levels compared to patients of European ancestry. Higher sSIGLEC-1 concentrations were associated with lower serum complement component 3 and increased frequency of renal complications in European patients, but not with the SLE Disease Activity Index clinical score. CONCLUSIONS: Our sSIGLEC-1 immunoassay provides a specific and easily assayed marker for monocyte-macrophage activation, and interferonopathy in SLE and other diseases. Further studies can extend its clinical associations and its potential use to stratify patients and as a secondary endpoint in clinical trials.

Genetic contributions to lupus nephritis in a multi-ethnic cohort of systemic lupus erythematous patients.

OBJECTIVE: African Americans, East Asians, and Hispanics with systemic lupus erythematous (SLE) are more likely to develop lupus nephritis (LN) than are SLE patients of European descent. The etiology of this difference is not clear, and this study was undertaken to investigate how genetic variants might explain this effect. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 1244 SLE patients from multiethnic case collections were genotyped for 817,810 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) across the genome. Continental genetic ancestry was estimated utilizing the program ADMIXTURE. Gene-based testing and pathway analysis was performed within each ethnic group and meta-analyzed across ethnicities. We also performed candidate SNP association tests with SNPs previously established as risk alleles for SLE, LN, and chronic kidney disease (CKD). Association testing and logistic regression models were performed with LN as the outcome, adjusted for continental ancestries, sex, disease duration, and age. RESULTS: We studied 255 North European, 263 South European, 238 Hispanic, 224 African American and 264 East Asian SLE patients, of whom 606 had LN (48.7%). In genome-wide gene-based and candidate SNP analyses, we found distinct genes, pathways and established risk SNPs associated with LN for each ethnic group. Gene-based analyses showed significant associations between variation in ZNF546 (p = 1.0E-06), TRIM15 (p = 1.0E-06), and TRIMI0 (p = 1.0E-06) and LN among South Europeans, and TTC34 (p = 8.0E-06) was significantly associated with LN among Hispanics. The SNP rs8091180 in NFATC1 was associated with LN (OR 1.43, p = 3.3E-04) in the candidate SNP meta-analysis with the highest OR among African-Americans (OR 2.17, p = 0.0035). CONCLUSION: Distinct genetic factors are associated with the risk of LN in SLE patients of different ethnicities. CKD risk alleles may play a role in the development of LN in addition to SLE-associated risk variants. These findings may further explain the clinical heterogeneity of LN risk and response to therapy observed between different ethnic groups.

The clinical manifestations and response to treatment in South Africans with lupus nephritis.

There are varying observations on the influence of ethnicity on the clinical spectrum and response to treatment in lupus nephritis (LN). We studied a multiethnic South African LN cohort to determine the clinical manifestations, histological involvement and response to therapy. We reviewed the records of LN patients at Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital in Durban. There were 105 patients, 92.5% females and they comprised 49.1% Indians and 45.3% African Blacks. The mean age was 31.3 ± 12.5 years, and 41.5% had LN at first presentation of lupus. The most common histological classes were Class V alone in 34.9%, Class IV (± Class V) in 25.5% and Class III (±Class V) in 22.6%. The estimated glomerular filtration rate was reduced (<30 ml/min) at presentation in 15 (14.2%). Eighty-seven patients received therapy for LN. A response to induction therapy was noted in 81.6% and maintenance therapy (12 months) in 73.6%. Response to mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was 80.4% and 68.4% during induction and maintenance therapy, respectively. There was no ethnic difference in the histological class or response to MMF but African Blacks had more severe renal disease at presentation. In conclusion, our multiethnic LN cohort shows a high prevalence of membranous LN and good response to treatment.