At the threshold of viability: to resuscitate or not to resuscitate - the perspectives of Israeli neonatologists.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to examine the perspectives of neonatologists in Israel regarding resuscitation of preterm infants born at 22-24 weeks gestation and their consideration of parental preferences. The factors that influence physicians' decisions on the verge of viability were investigated, and the extent to which their decisions align with the national clinical guidelines were determined. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive and correlative study using a 47-questions online questionnaire. RESULTS: 90 (71%) of 127 active neonatologists in Israel responded. 74%, 50% and 16% of the respondents believed that resuscitation and full treatment at birth are against the best interests of infants born at 22, 23 and 24 weeks gestation, respectively. Respondents' decisions regarding resuscitation of extremely preterm infants showed significant variation and were consistently in disagreement with either the national clinical guidelines or the perception of what is in the best interest of these newborns. Gender, experience, country of birth and the level of religiosity were all associated with respondents' preferences regarding treatment decisions. Personal values and concerns about legal issues were also believed to affect decision-making. CONCLUSION: Significant variation was observed among Israeli neonatologists regarding delivery room management of extremely premature infants born at 22-24 weeks gestation, usually with a notable emphasis on respecting parents' wishes. The current national guidelines do not fully encompass the wide range of approaches. The country's guidelines should reflect the existing range of opinions, possibly through a broad survey of caregivers before setting the guidelines and recommendations.

Reporting interhospital neonatal intensive care transport: international five-step Delphi-based template.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a general and internationally applicable template of data variables for reporting interhospital neonatal intensive care transports. DESIGN: A five-step Delphi method. SETTING: A group of experts was guided through a formal consensus process using email. SUBJECTS: 12 experts in neonatal intensive care transports from Canada, Denmark, Norway, the UK and the USA. Four women and eight men. The experts were neonatologists, anaesthesiologists, intensive care nurse, anaesthetic nurse, medical leaders, researchers and a parent representative. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: 37 data variables were included in the final template. RESULTS: Consensus was achieved on a template of 37 data variables with definitions. 30 variables to be registered for each transport and 7 for annual registration of the system of the transport service. 11 data variables under the category structure, 20 under process and 6 under outcome. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a template with a set of data variables to be registered for neonatal intensive care transports. To register the same data will enable larger datasets and comparing services.

A National Survey of Neonatologists' Perspectives on Probiotics Use in Neonatal Intensive Care Units in the U.S.A.

Introduction: Most recent clinical reports from the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) concluded current evidence does not support routine universal administration of probiotics to preterm infants, particularly those with birth weight <1000 grams. Despite this, the use of probiotics is increasing in US neonatal intensive care units (NICU).Objectives: Collaborating with the Perinatal Neonatal Medicine of AAP, we conducted a national survey to obtain neonatologist opinion on probiotics use.Methods: Survey questionnaires were sent to 3000 neonatologists via email.Results: Of 3000 potential respondents, 249 (8.3 %) completed the survey. Seventy-five (30%) neonatologists working in 23 different NICUs reported using probiotics in their practice, while 168 (70%) neonatologists working in 54 different NICUs reported not using probiotics. Of those not currently use probiotics, 49% indicated they would consider using probiotics in the future vs. 12% indicating they would not use probiotics. The most common indication for probiotics use was average gestational age < 32 weeks and mean birth weight < 1500 grams. Probiotics were discontinued at mean gestational age of 35 weeks. Respondents who prescribe probiotics were more likely to work in a setting without fellowship or residency training (48% vs 20%). Probiotics users were more often from the West (29 % vs 7%) and less often from Northeast (5% vs 34%) compared to non-users. The proportion of those using probiotics did not significantly differ by NICU size, NICU level, or years working in a NICU. Similac Tri-Blend, Evivo, and Culturelle were the top three probiotics used in the respondent's NICU.Conclusion: Though a majority of respondents are not currently using probiotics in their NICU, a large number of nonusers are interested in using probiotics in the future. Differences continue to exist in the brand of probiotics used in US NICUs.

Central nervous system tumours in neonates: what should the neonatologist know?

Central nervous system (CNS) tumours in neonates are relatively rare and present differently when compared with those occurring later in childhood in terms of aetiology, clinical features, location, histology and prognosis. The clinical presentation is extremely variable. Even if the most frequent clinical sign is a macrocephaly, there are many other non-specific symptoms associated. The prognosis is usually poor with overall survival of less than 30%. Surgery continues to be the primary treatment for neonatal CNS tumours, aiming for a gross total resection, directly correlated with prognosis and the overall outcome. The chemotherapy is the only adjuvant therapy whereas the radiotherapy is avoided under three years of age because of the severe sequelae. Hence the importance of molecular characterization of these neoplasms in order to improve the accuracy of the diagnosis and identify new therapeutic targets. The aim of this review is to describe the main characteristics of these tumours and the recent advances in their treatment in order to recognize these pathologies in the prenatal period and create a multidisciplinary team providing the best possible treatment while minimising the risk of long-term complications. Neonatologists play a key role in the early detection, diagnostic evaluation, management and supportive care of these neonates.  Conclusion: The aim of this review is to describe the main characteristics of these tumours and the recent advances in their treatment in order to ensure the essential knowledge that will help the neonatologist identify them and create a multidisciplinary team providing the best possible treatment while minimising the risk of long-term complications. What is Known: • Neonatal CNS tumours are relatively rare and their early identification is important to identify the best diagnostic-therapeutic management. • Surgery is the main treatment of neonatal CNS tumours. The extent of surgical resection directly correlates with prognosis and outcome. What is New: • Predisposing conditions such as Cancer Predisposition Syndromes must be considered. • Targeted drugs and other therapeutic strategies can be identified through molecular characterization.

Platelet transfusion practices among neonatologists in Saudi Arabia: A nationwide cross-sectional survey.

The etiologies of thrombocytopenia are highly diverse; however, early neonatal thrombocytopenia might be more common among extremely low-weight neonates. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to examine the current neonatal platelet (PLT) transfusion practices in Saudi Arabia. This is a cross-sectional online survey study that was conducted between October and December 2022. Convenience sampling was used to recruit the participants. In this study, we developed a questionnaire based on an extensive literature review to examine current neonatal PLT transfusion practices. A total of 81 neonatologists participated. The vast majority of them (85.2%) were practicing in a level 3 neonatal intensive care unit, with 60.0% of them reporting that they transfuse PLTs over 1 hour. Around 53% reported that they typically order 10 mL/kg per PLT transfusion. Up to 34.6% of the study participants reported that they use pooled whole-blood-derived PLT products in their practicing unit. Almost half (48.0%) of the study participants reported that they have written guidelines for PLT transfusion in their practicing unit, with 81.1% reporting that the PLT transfusion threshold was stated in the guidelines. Neonatal thrombocytopenia is typically treated with PLT transfusions. PLT transfusion criteria should be lowered in light of recent evidence suggesting that doing so may be counterproductive. However, there is some disagreement about whether a PLT count constitutes a medical emergency requiring a transfusion for a newborn baby. Furthermore, there is a great deal of variation in the administration of PLT infusions in Saudi Arabia because of the absence of clear protocols. Strict neonatal PLT transfusion standards and carefully planned clinical research are needed to address the risks and/or benefits of these diverse methods.

Academic neonatologist-a species at the brink of extinction?

Neonatology is a field that is currently facing many challenges. These challenges include outdated work models in clinical environments with increasing acuity and patient workloads, physician burnout exacerbated by gender inequity and the recent COVID-19 pandemic, and inappropriate metrics to measure clinical productivity. Academic neonatologists have additional missions that include research, teaching, and scholarly productivity in the setting of an increasing clinical workload and reduced time and support for teaching and research. Within the university-based practice setting, reimbursement, and salary structure result in relatively low compensation for neonatologist clinical productivity and time. These challenges threaten the sustainability of academic neonatology as a field. Working towards potential solutions such as creation of sustainable, transparent work models, and aligned funds flow within university-based settings is imperative.

Malaria in Pregnancy: Key Points for the Neonatologist.

In malaria-endemic regions, infection with the malaria parasite Plasmodium during pregnancy has been identified as a key modifiable factor in preterm birth, the delivery of low-birthweight infants, and stillbirth. Compared with their nonpregnant peers, pregnant persons are at higher risk for malaria infection. Malaria infection can occur at any time during pregnancy, with negative effects for the pregnant person and the fetus, depending on the trimester in which the infection is contracted. Pregnant patients who are younger, in their first or second pregnancy, and those coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus are at increased risk for malaria. Common infection prevention measures during pregnancy include the use of insecticide-treated bed nets and the use of intermittent preventive treatment with monthly doses of antimalarials, beginning in the second trimester in pregnant patients in endemic areas. In all trimesters, artemisinin-combination therapies are the first-line treatment for uncomplicated falciparum malaria, similar to treatment in nonpregnant adults. The World Health Organization recently revised its recommendations, now listing the specific medication artemether-lumefantrine as first-line treatment for uncomplicated malaria in the first trimester. While strong prevention and detection methods exist, use of these techniques remains below global targets. Ongoing work on approaches to treatment and prevention of malaria during pregnancy remains at the forefront of global maternal child health research.

The Role of the Neonatologist in Fetuses Diagnosed with Congenital Heart Disease.

Prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease (CHD) can decrease preoperative morbidity and mortality. Delivery room planning can improve cardiac hemodynamics and time to critical catheter and surgical interventions. Care algorithms have defined lesion-specific level-of-care assignments and delivery room action plans that can facilitate team-based approaches to safe deliveries. Neonatologists play critical roles in the care of fetuses diagnosed with CHD, from the time of diagnosis through the postnatal intensive care unit (ICU) stays. Prenatally, neonatologists are members of the multidisciplinary counseling teams, with expertise to counsel expectant parents about what to expect during the ICU stay, which is especially valuable in CHD associated with extracardiac or genetic anomalies. Neonatologists' role in delivery planning includes identification of the optimal delivery location and allocation of appropriate personnel and resources. After delivery, postnatal care considerations include hemodynamic stability, optimization of end-organ function, genetics consultation, developmentally appropriate care practices to encourage caregiver bonding, and optimization of care to improve neurodevelopmental outcomes of neonates with CHD.

Multicenter Clinical Research in Congenital Heart Disease: Leveraging Research Networks to Investigate Important Unanswered Questions.

Congenital heart disease (CHD) is the most common birth defect in the United States. Neonates with CHD are often cared for by neonatologists in addition to cardiologists. However, there is a paucity of rigorous evidence and limited clinical trials regarding the management of neonates with CHD. In this review, we will describe some of the challenges of research in this field. The Pediatric Heart Network serves as an example of how a research network can effectively overcome barriers to conduct and execute well-designed multicenter studies.

A Qualitative Study of Nurses' Perspectives on Neonatologist Continuity of Care.

BACKGROUND: Families and staff in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) value continuity of care (COC), though definitions, delivery, and impacts of COC are incompletely described. Previously, we used parental perspectives to define and build a conceptual model of COC provided by neonatologists. Nursing perspectives about COC remain unclear. PURPOSE: To describe nursing perspectives on neonatologist COC and revise our conceptual model with neonatal nurse input. METHODS: This was a qualitative study interviewing NICU nurses. The investigators analyzed transcripts with directed content analysis guided by an existing framework of neonatologist COC. Codes were categorized according to previously described COC components, impact on infants and families, and improvements for neonatologist COC. New codes were identified, including impact on nurses, and codes were classified into themes. RESULTS: From 15 nurses, 5 themes emerged: (1) nurses validated parental definitions and benefits of COC; (2) communication is nurses' most valued component of COC; (3) neonatologist COC impact on nurses; (4) factors that modulate the delivery of and need for COC; (5) conflict between the need for COC and the need for change. Suggested improvement strategies included optimizing staffing and transition processes, utilizing clinical guidelines, and enhancing communication at all levels. Our adapted conceptual model describes variables associated with COC. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE AND RESEARCH: Interdisciplinary NICU teams need to develop systematic strategies tailored to their unit's and patients' needs that promote COC, focused to improve parent-clinician communication and among clinicians. Our conceptual model can help future investigators develop targeted interventions to improve COC.

Fatigue and fallibility: the perils of prolonged shifts for neonatologists.

Sleep deprivation is a major challenge for neonatologists, who face increasing demands in the complex healthcare system. Current neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) schedule models often include extended shifts and overnight call, which can lead to sleep deprivation. This lack of sufficient sleep poses adverse health risks to neonatologists and can impair cognitive function, which increases the risk of medical errors and compromises patient safety. This paper proposes reducing shift durations and implementing policies and interventions to reduce fatigue among neonatologists and improve patient safety. The paper also offers policymakers, healthcare leaders, and NICU physicians valuable insights on potential ways to promote the health of the neonatologist workforce and safety in the NICU.

Excessive workload and insufficient night-shift remuneration are key elements of dissatisfaction at work for French neonatologists.

AIM: Neonatologists are exposed to ethical issues and unplanned emergencies that require 24-h in-house coverage. These elements may affect quality of life at work, which we surveyed. METHODS: This was a self-administered, voluntary and anonymous cross-sectional survey of French neonatologists. An online questionnaire was sent to members of the French Society of Neonatology from June to October 2022. RESULTS: Of approximately 1500 possible responses, 721 were analysed, with a response rate of 48%. Respondents were mostly women (77%), aged 35-50 years (50%), and hospital practitioners (63%). Reported weekly working time was over 50 h for 80%. Among the 650 neonatologists with on-call duty, 47% worked ≥5 shifts per month. For 80% of practitioners, on-call duty was perceived to have a negative impact on personal life; 49% indicated having sleep disorders. The mean satisfaction score at work was 5.7 ± 1.7 on a scale of 0-10. The main reasons for dissatisfaction were excessive working hours and insufficient remuneration for on-call duty. CONCLUSION: This first evaluation of the quality of life at work of French neonatologists showed high workload. The working conditions and specificities of NICU activity may have significant consequences for their mental health.

Do parents get what they want during bad news delivery in NICU?

OBJECTIVES: Little is known about parents' preferences in breaking bad news (BBN) in neonatology. The study was aimed at comparing parents' experiences with their first BBN discussion with a neonatologist/pediatric surgeon to their personal preferences. METHODS: We conducted a quantitative survey amongst 54 parents of hospitalized preterm or term infants with severe diseases in two medium-size and one small German neonatal units. Parents answered self-rated questions on how they perceived BBN during their infant's hospital stay, asking for procedure and perception of BBN, their preferences and satisfaction with BBN. RESULTS: Overall satisfaction with BBN was moderate to high (median (min-max): 8 (1-10) on a 1-10-Likert scale). A compassionate way of disclosure correlated highest with overall satisfaction with BBN. Thorough transmission of information in an easy to understand manner emerged as another crucial point and correlated significantly to satisfaction with BBN, too. The study revealed that it was highly important for parents, that physicians had good knowledge of the infant and the course of his/her disease, which was only met in a minority of cases. Moreover, there was a major discrepancy between expected and observed professional competence of the delivering physicians. Additionally, physicians did not set aside sufficient time for BBN and parents reported a lack of transporting assurance and hope. CONCLUSIONS: In BBN physicians should draw greatest attention to ensure understanding in parents, with good knowledge of child and disease and sufficient time in a trustworthy manner. Physicians should focus on transporting competence, trust and gentleness.