Preventing Ovarian Cancer through early Excision of Tubes and late Ovarian Removal (PROTECTOR): protocol for a prospective non-randomised multi-center trial.

BACKGROUND: Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy is the 'gold standard' for preventing tubo-ovarian cancer in women at increased risk. However, when performed in pre-menopausal women, it results in premature menopause and associated detrimental health consequences. This, together with acceptance of the central role of the fallopian tube in etiopathogenesis of high-grade serous carcinoma, by far the most common type of tubo-ovarian cancer, has led to risk-reducing early salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy being proposed as a two-step surgical alternative for pre-menopausal women declining/delaying oophorectomy. PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact on sexual function of risk-reducing early salpingectomy, within a two-step, risk-reducing, early salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy tubo-ovarian cancer prevention strategy in pre-menopausal women at increased risk of tubo-ovarian cancer. STUDY HYPOTHESIS: Risk-reducing early salpingectomy is non-inferior for sexual and endocrine function compared with controls; risk-reducing early salpingectomy is superior for sexual/endocrine function, non-inferior for quality-of-life, and equivalent in satisfaction to the standard risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy. TRIAL DESIGN: Multi-center, observational cohort trial with three arms: risk-reducing early salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy; risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy; controls (no surgery). Consenting individuals undergo an ultrasound, serum CA125, and follicle-stimulating hormone measurements and provide information on medical history, family history, quality-of-life, sexual function, cancer worry, psychological well-being, and satisfaction/regret. Follow-up by questionnaire takes place annually for 3 years. Women receiving risk-reducing early salpingectomy can undergo delayed oophorectomy at a later date of their choosing, or definitely by the menopause. MAJOR INCLUSION/EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Inclusion criteria: pre-menopausal; aged >30 years; at increased risk of tubo-ovarian cancer (mutation carriers or on the basis of a strong family history); completed their family (for surgical arms). EXCLUSION CRITERIA: post-menopausal; previous bilateral salpingectomy or bilateral oophorectomy; pregnancy; previous tubal/ovarian/peritoneal malignancy; <12 months after cancer treatment; clinical suspicion of tubal/ovarian cancer at baseline. PRIMARY ENDPOINT: Sexual function measured by validated questionnaires. SAMPLE SIZE: 1000 (333 per arm). ESTIMATED DATES FOR COMPLETING ACCRUAL AND PRESENTING RESULTS: It is estimated recruitment will be completed by 2023 and results published by 2027. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN registry: 25 173 360 (https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN25173360).

[Does ovarian cancer start in the fallopian tubes? Possible implications for preventive adnexal removal]. / Begint ovariumcarcinoom in de tubae?

BACKGROUND: Recent insights in high-grade serous ovarian cancer development are pointing to the fallopian tubes as likely place of origin and not the ovaries themselves. This may have consequences for patients with increased risk of ovarian cancer. Adnexal removal is currently recommended for this patient group at an age of 35-45, which leads to premature menopause. CASE DESCRIPTION: In a 55-year-old woman with a BRCA1 germ line mutation, a high-grade serous carcinoma was unexpectedly diagnosed in both fallopian tubes during preventive adnexal removal. Her ovaries did not have any abnormalities. CONCLUSION: This case illustrates a fallopian tube origin for high-grade serous ovarian cancer development in a carrier of a BRCA1 germ line mutation. In the future, salpingectomy could play a role in ovarian cancer prevention. However, research is needed first to demonstrate the safety of this strategy. Salpingectomy in women with a BRCA germ line mutation should therefore only be performed in the context of research for the time being.

Ovarian serous carcinogenesis from tubal secretory cells.

Due to a poor understanding of tumorigenesis, ovarian cancers remain the most lethal gynecologic malignancy and cause horrific deaths. In the last decade, a new dualistic model for ovarian cancer was proposed, wherein ovarian serous cancers are classified as either high-grade or low-grade, with each having different tumorigenic processes, and pathologic and clinical features. Surprisingly, both high- and low-grade ovarian serous cancers were recently found to originate not in the ovaries, but rather from the secretory cells of the fallopian tube, mostly from the tubal fimbriated ends. In this article, we review the evidentiary basis for the aforementioned paradigm shift in the cell origin of ovarian serous cancers, as well as its potential clinical implications.

New insights in the pathophysiology of ovarian cancer and implications for screening and prevention.

Despite advances in medicine, ovarian cancer remains the deadliest of the gynecological malignancies. Herein we present the latest information on the pathophysiology of ovarian cancer and its significance for ovarian cancer screening and prevention. A new paradigm for ovarian cancer pathogenesis presupposes 2 distinct types of ovarian epithelial carcinoma with distinct molecular profiles: type I and type II carcinomas. Type I tumors include endometrioid, clear-cell carcinoma, and low-grade serous carcinoma and mostly arise via defined sequence either from endometriosis or from borderline serous tumors, mostly presenting in an early stage. More frequent type II carcinomas are usually high-grade serous tumors, and recent evidence suggests that the majority arise from the fimbriated end of the fallopian tube. Subsequently, high-grade serous carcinomas usually present at advanced stages, likely as a consequence of the rapid peritoneal seeding from the open ends of the fallopian tubes. On the other hand, careful clinical evaluation should be performed along with risk stratification and targeted treatment of women with premalignant conditions leading to type I cancers, most notably endometriosis and endometriomas. Although the chance of malignant transformation is low, an understanding of this link offers a possibility of prevention and early intervention. This new evidence explains difficulties in ovarian cancer screening and helps in forming new recommendations for ovarian cancer risk evaluation and prophylactic treatments.

Carcinoma medular quístico de mama / Cystic medullary breast carcinoma

No disponible