RESUMEN
In 2022, two updated classification systems for lymphoid neoplasms were published by the World Health Organization (WHO Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours, 5th edition, referred to hereafter as WHO-HAEM5) and the International Consensus Conference (ICC) (Alaggio et al. in Leukemia 36(7):1720-1748, 2022; Campo et al. in Blood 140(11):1229-1253, 2022). Both classifications were conceived by both pathologists and clinicians with expertise in the field. The reasons for this have been reviewed previously (Arber et al. in Virchows Arch 482(1):1-9, 2023; Cree in Leukemia 36(7):1701-1702, 2022, Leukemia 36(11):2750, 2022). Given that both groups were using data-driven processes and consensus and used the revised 4th edition of the WHO Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours (WHO-HAEM4R) as a starting point, it is not entirely surprising that the resulting classifications are quite similar. However, they are not identical and reflect preferences or approaches for certain unsettled areas as well as preferred terminology. In this review, we will compare nomenclature of the WHO-HAEM5 and ICC classifications, focusing on lymphoid neoplasms and lymphoproliferative disorders (LPDs).
Asunto(s)
Consenso , Organización Mundial de la Salud , Humanos , Neoplasias de Células Plasmáticas/clasificación , Neoplasias de Células Plasmáticas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de Células Plasmáticas/patología , Células Asesinas Naturales/patología , Células Asesinas Naturales/inmunología , Neoplasias Hematológicas/clasificación , Neoplasias Hematológicas/patología , Linfocitos T/inmunología , Linfocitos T/patologíaRESUMEN
Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable malignant plasma cell neoplasm, representing the second most common hematopoietic cancer. As plasma cell neoplasms are clonal and often secrete a monoclonal protein (M-spike), laboratory diagnosis is usually straightforward, especially when ancillary studies such as immunohistochemistry, flow cytometry, and protein electrophoresis are available in addition to microscopic examination. Despite the repertoire of diagnostic tools, rare cases pose diagnostic dilemmas, especially when reagent antibodies do not react as expected, extent of disease is patchy, or when disease occurs in unique age groups. In this retrospective study, we report a series of challenging diagnostic cases, discussing aberrant findings and comparing them to more classic counterparts. Twelve cases collected during routine clinical sign-out were reanalyzed and include examples of MGUS, classic multiple myeloma, t(11; 14) rearranged myeloma, minimal residual disease, AA and AL amyloidosis, truncated light chain, non-secretory and non-producer myeloma, biphenotypic myeloma, oligoclonal expansion after bone marrow transplant, and plasma cell leukemia in a young adult. This cohort showcases the diversity of atypical presentations of plasma cell neoplasms, and we highlight standardized approaches to workup to avoid diagnostic pitfalls.
Asunto(s)
Inmunofenotipificación , Mieloma Múltiple , Humanos , Inmunofenotipificación/métodos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Mieloma Múltiple/patología , Mieloma Múltiple/diagnóstico , Mieloma Múltiple/inmunología , Adulto , Citometría de Flujo , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias de Células Plasmáticas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de Células Plasmáticas/patología , Inmunohistoquímica , Biomarcadores de Tumor/análisis , Valor Predictivo de las PruebasRESUMEN
The emergence of novel drugs has significantly improved outcomes of patients with plasma cell neoplasms (PCN). The Japanese Society of Hematology conducted a prospective observational study in newly diagnosed PCN patients between 2016 and 2021. The analysis focused on 1385 patients diagnosed with symptomatic PCN between 2016 and 2018. The primary endpoint was the 3-year overall survival (OS) rate among patients requiring treatment (n = 1284), which was 70.0% (95%CI 67.4-72.6%). Approximately 94% of these patients received novel drugs as frontline therapy. The 3-year OS rate was 90.3% (95%CI 86.6-93.1%) in the 25% of patients who received upfront autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), versus just 61.4% (95%CI 58.0-64.6%) in those who did not receive upfront ASCT. The only unfavorable prognostic factor that affected OS in ASCT recipients was an age of 65 or higher. For patients who did not receive ASCT, independent unfavorable prognostic factors included frontline treatment with conventional chemotherapies, international staging system score of 2/3, extramedullary tumors, and Freiberg comorbidity index of 2/3. This study unequivocally demonstrates that use of novel drugs improved OS in Japanese myeloma patients, and underscores the continued importance of upfront ASCT as the standard of care in the era of novel drugs.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de Células Plasmáticas , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Anciano , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Japón , Neoplasias de Células Plasmáticas/terapia , Trasplante Autólogo , Pronóstico , Tasa de Supervivencia , Adulto , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Mieloma Múltiple/mortalidad , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Pueblos del Este de AsiaRESUMEN
The objective of our study was to report real-world data on the safety and efficacy of standard-of-care teclistamab in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM). This is a multi-institutional retrospective cohort study and included all consecutive patients that received at least one dose of teclistamab up until August 2023. One hundred and ten patients were included, of whom, 86% had triple-class refractory disease, 76% penta-refractory disease, and 35% had prior exposure to B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-targeting therapies. The overall response rate (ORR) in our cohort was 62%, with a ≥ very good partial remission (VGPR) rate of 51%. The ORR in patients with and without prior BCMA-targeted therapies was 54% vs 67%, respectively (p = 0.23). At a median follow-up of 3.5 months (range, 0.39-10.92), the estimated 3 month and 6 month progression free survival (PFS) was 57% (95% CI, 48%, 68%) and 52% (95% CI, 42%, 64%) respectively. The incidence of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) was 56% and 11% respectively, with grade ≥3 CRS and ICANS noted in 3.5% and 4.6% of patients respectively. 78 unique infections were diagnosed in 44 patients, with the incidence of all-grade and grade ≥3 infections being 40% vs 26% respectively. Primary prophylaxis with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) was associated with a significantly lower infection risk on multivariate analysis (Hazard ratio [HR] 0.33; 95% CI 0.17, 0.64; p = 0.001).
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Biespecíficos , Antineoplásicos , Mieloma Múltiple , Neoplasias de Células Plasmáticas , Tetranitrato de Pentaeritritol , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Antígeno de Maduración de Linfocitos B , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Background: The aggregation of clonal plasma cells causes plasma cell neoplasms, which vary in severity and clinical outcomes. The present research focused on the epidemiological, clinical, immunologic, and cytogenetic characteristics of plasma cell neoplasms. Methods: In this five-year retrospective cross-sectional study, demographic information such as age and sex, calcium elevation, renal insufficiency, anemia, and bone lesion (CRAB) characteristics, as well as laboratory data including bone marrow and peripheral blood film results, immunohistochemistry, flow cytometry, and cytogenetic study outcomes were collected at Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. The collected data were analyzed using SPSS Statistics software (version 20.0). Descriptive statistics were reported as numbers, percentages, and mean±SD. Results: 417 newly diagnosed plasma cell neoplasm patients were confirmed by bone marrow or other tissue biopsy tests. 279 patients were men (66.9%). The most prevalent age group was 60-64 years old (18.46%). Plasma cell myeloma (PCM) affected 355 (85.13%) patients, while monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) affected 6 (1.43%) patients. Solitary plasmacytoma was seen in 56 (13.42%) patients. At the time of diagnosis, 119 (33.52%) of 355 PCM patients were asymptomatic, whereas 236 (66.47%) patients had at least one CRAB symptom, 55 (15.49%) had two or more, and 14 (3.94%) had three or more. There were 7 (1.97%) cases of amyloidosis. Cytogenetic abnormalities were found in 51.28% (40/78) of the patients. Twenty-one individuals (52.5%) were hyperdiploid with multiple trisomy, while 19 (47.50%) were not. Conclusion: When diagnosed, Iranian PCM patients might have more advanced disease. PCM was more prevalent in young adults, and hyperdiploid was the most common cytogenetic finding in this investigation.
Asunto(s)
Mieloma Múltiple , Neoplasias de Células Plasmáticas , Plasmacitoma , Masculino , Adulto Joven , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Mieloma Múltiple/patología , Irán/epidemiología , Citometría de Flujo/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios Transversales , Neoplasias de Células Plasmáticas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de Células Plasmáticas/epidemiología , Aneuploidia , Análisis Citogenético , DemografíaRESUMEN
ABSTRACT: Bispecific antibodies that engage T cells to target B-cell maturation antigen or G-protein-coupled receptor class C group 5 member D have demonstrated remarkable efficacy in heavily pretreated relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM), leading to the recent accelerated approval of teclistamab, elranatamab, and talquetamab by health agencies. Future challenges, however, remain to define their optimal dosing schedule and duration, sequencing, and integration with established anti-MM therapeutics as well as delineating the biological and clinical mediators of immune escape.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Biespecíficos , Mieloma Múltiple , Neoplasias de Células Plasmáticas , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Anticuerpos Biespecíficos/uso terapéutico , Antígeno de Maduración de Linfocitos B , Receptores Acoplados a Proteínas GRESUMEN
Teclistamab, a B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) × CD3 directed bispecific antibody, has shown high response rates and durable remissions in the MAJESTEC-1 trial in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). We retrospectively assessed efficacy and tolerability in 123 patients treated at 18 different German centers to determine whether outcome is comparable in the real-world setting. Most patients had triple-class (93%) or penta-drug (60%) refractory disease, 37% of patients had received BCMA-directed pretreatment including idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) CAR-T cell therapy (21/123, 17.1%). With a follow-up of 5.5 months, we observed an overall response rate (ORR) of 59.3% and a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 8.7 months. In subgroup analyses, we found significantly lower ORR and median PFS in patients with extramedullary disease (37%/2.1 months), and/or an ISS of 3 (37%/1.3 months), and ide-cel pretreated patients (33%/1.8 months). Nonetheless, the duration of response in ide-cel pretreated patients was comparable to that of anti-BCMA naive patients. Infections and grade ≥3 cytopenias were the most frequent adverse events. In summary, we found that teclistamab exhibited a comparable efficacy and safety profile in the real-world setting as in the pivotal trial.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Biespecíficos , Antineoplásicos , Mieloma Múltiple , Neoplasias de Células Plasmáticas , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Antígeno de Maduración de Linfocitos B , Estudios Retrospectivos , Alemania , Inmunoterapia AdoptivaRESUMEN
Ide-cel received approval for relapsed-refractory multiple myeloma based on the results of the KarMMa-1 trial. However, patients with significant comorbidities, aggressive disease and prior B-cell maturation antigen-directed therapy (BCMA-DT) were excluded. This retrospective study evaluated real-world outcomes of patients who did not meet the KarMMa-1 eligibility criteria and were treated with standard of care (SOC) ide-cel. A total of 69 patients from three US centres who did not meet the KarMMa-1 criteria underwent ide-cel infusion. The main reasons for trial ineligibility included baseline grade 3-4 cytopenia (39%), prior BCMA-DT (26%), renal impairment (19%) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥2 (14.5%). Cytokine-release syndrome occurred in 81% vs. 84%, and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome occurred in 28% vs. 18% of SOC versus KarMMa-1 patients, respectively. Early infection (≤8 weeks post-infusion) and severe infection rates were 42% vs. 49% and 30% vs. 22% for the SOC versus KarMMa-1 cohorts, respectively. Grade 3-4 cytopenias for SOC versus KarMMa-1 cohorts were: neutropenia (87% vs. 89%), anaemia (51% vs. 60%) and thrombocytopenia (65% vs. 52%). Overall response rate was higher for the SOC cohort (93% vs. 73%), as was the complete response or better rate (48% vs. 33%). However, median progression-free survival and overall survival were comparable between the two groups. Our findings support broadening the inclusion criteria of future trials evaluating ide-cel.
Asunto(s)
Citopenia , Mieloma Múltiple , Neoplasias de Células Plasmáticas , Neutropenia , Receptores Quiméricos de Antígenos , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Antígeno de Maduración de Linfocitos B , Estudios Retrospectivos , Inmunoterapia AdoptivaRESUMEN
Since 2021, 2 B cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapies-idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel), and ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel)-have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treating relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) after 4 or more prior lines of therapy, including an immunomodulatory drug, a proteasome inhibitor, and an anti-CD38 antibody. The 2 products have shown unprecedented activity in RRMM, but relapses remain common, and access to and safety of CAR-T therapy in patients with rapidly progressing advanced disease are not ideal. Sequencing CAR-T therapy with other options, including the 2 recently approved BCMA-directed T cell-engaging bispecific antibodies teclistamab and elranatamab, has become increasingly challenging owing to data showing inferior outcomes from CAR-T therapy after prior BCMA-directed therapy. This has led to the consideration of CAR-T therapy earlier in the course of disease for myeloma, when T cells are potentially healthier and the myeloma is less aggressive. To address the question of earlier use of CAR-T therapy, several trials are either ongoing or planned, and results have recently been reported for 2 randomized trials of CAR-T therapy showing improved progression-free survival compared to standard of care therapy in second-line (CARTITUDE-4) or third-line therapy (KarMMA-3). With the anticipation of the FDA possibly expanding approval of CAR-T to earlier lines of myeloma therapy, the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy convened a group of experts to provide a comprehensive review of the studies that led to the approval of CAR-T therapy in late-line therapy for myeloma, discuss the recently reported and ongoing studies designed to move CAR-T therapy to earlier lines of therapy, and share insights and considerations for sequencing therapy and optimization of patient selection for BCMA-directed therapies in current practice.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Biespecíficos , Mieloma Múltiple , Neoplasias de Células Plasmáticas , Receptores Quiméricos de Antígenos , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Receptores Quiméricos de Antígenos/genética , Receptores Quiméricos de Antígenos/uso terapéutico , Antígeno de Maduración de Linfocitos B , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Tratamiento Basado en Trasplante de Células y TejidosRESUMEN
We evaluated patients with relapsed multiple myeloma with renal impairment (RI) treated with standard of care idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel), as outcomes with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy are unknown in this population. RI was defined as creatinine clearance (CrCl) <50 mL/min. CrCl of <30 mL/min or dialysis dependence were defined as severe RI. The study cohort included 214 patients, 28 (13%) patients with RI, including 11 patients severe RI (dialysis, N=1). Patients with RI were older, more likely to be female and had higher likelihood of having Revised International Staging System stage 3 disease. Rates and severity of cytokine release syndrome (89% vs. 84%, grade ≥3: 7% vs. 2%) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (23% vs. 20%) were similar in patients with and without RI, respectively. Patients with RI had higher incidence of short-term grade ≥3 cytopenias, although cytopenias were similar by 3 months following CAR T-cell therapy. Renal function did not worsen after CAR T-cell therapy in patients with RI. Response rates (93% vs. 82%) and survival outcomes (median progression-free survival: 9 vs. 8 months; P=0.26) were comparable in patients with and without RI, respectively. Treatment with ide-cel is feasible in patients with RI, with a comparable safety and efficacy profile as patients without RI, with notable exception of higher short-term high-grade cytopenias.
Asunto(s)
Citopenia , Mieloma Múltiple , Neoplasias de Células Plasmáticas , Receptores Quiméricos de Antígenos , Insuficiencia Renal , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Mieloma Múltiple/complicaciones , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva/efectos adversos , Tratamiento Basado en Trasplante de Células y TejidosRESUMEN
Initial results of the phase I trial of talquetamab, a bispecific antibody targeting GPRC5D and CD3, were reported in December of 2022 for the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma in the fourth line or later setting. It demonstrated a similar efficacy profile and durability of response to teclistamab, the first bispecific antibody therapy to be approved in multiple myeloma. Additionally, it has less infections than teclistamab but demonstrates unique class-specific side effects including skin, oral, and nail-related adverse events. Despite this, it is still a highly efficacious and well-tolerated therapy that will add to the armamentarium of therapeutics against heavily pretreated multiple myeloma.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Biespecíficos , Mieloma Múltiple , Neoplasias de Células Plasmáticas , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Anticuerpos Biespecíficos/uso terapéutico , PielRESUMEN
ABSTRACT: Idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) was the first chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy to gain US Food and Drug Administration approval for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). The clinical outcomes of standard of care (SOC) ide-cel in racially and ethnically diverse populations have been understudied. This study pooled data from 207 patients with RRMM (28% patients of racial and ethnic minority groups) treated with SOC ide-cel across 11 institutions to examine racial and ethnic differences in the incidence of toxicities and adverse events, response to ide-cel, and survival. This study included 22 (11%) Hispanic, 36 (17%) non-Hispanic Black, and 149 (72%) non-Hispanic White patients with RRMM. Compared with Hispanic and non-Hispanic White patients, non-Hispanic Black patients had higher median levels of C-reactive protein (1.0, 0.8, and 3.5 mg/dL, respectively; P = .02) and baseline ferritin (362.0 vs 307.0 vs 680.5, respectively; P = .08) and were more likely to develop cytokine release syndrome (77%, 85%, and 97%, respectively; P = .04). Although best overall response rate was lower among Hispanic patients (59%) than among non-Hispanic Black (86%) and White patients (86%; P = .01), there were no racial and ethnic differences in progression-free or overall survival. We provide, to our knowledge, the first and largest investigation of clinical outcomes of SOC ide-cel by race and ethnicity. Despite differences in safety and response to ide-cel, our findings encourage the use of ide-cel in all patients with RRMM. These findings should be confirmed in larger samples of diverse patients with RRMM, with longer follow-up time.
Asunto(s)
Mieloma Múltiple , Neoplasias de Células Plasmáticas , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva/efectos adversos , Etnicidad , Grupos MinoritariosRESUMEN
Recently, many new therapies have improved the outcomes of patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Nevertheless, recurrence is still unavoidable, and better treatment choices for RRMM are urgently needed. The clinical success of Chimera antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy in many hematological diseases, including leukemia and lymphoma, has drawn considerable attention to RRMM. As CAR T cell therapy continues to mature and challenge traditional therapies, it is gradually changing the treatment paradigm for MM patients. The B cell maturation antigen (BCMA), expressed in malignant plasma cells but not normal ones, is an ideal target for MM treatment, due to its high expression. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) has approved two BCMA-targeting CAR T cell products, idecabtagene vicleucel (Ide-cel) and ciltacabtagene autoleucel (Cilta-cel), for use in RRMM. In this review, we focus on data from RRMM patients involved in clinical trials of Ide-cel and Cilta-cel and discuss the present situation and future direction of CAR T cell therapy for this condition.
Asunto(s)
Mieloma Múltiple , Neoplasias de Células Plasmáticas , Receptores Quiméricos de Antígenos , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva , Antígeno de Maduración de Linfocitos B , Tratamiento Basado en Trasplante de Células y TejidosRESUMEN
Despite its promising outcomes, anti-BCMA chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy (CAR-T) is the most expensive myeloma treatment developed to date, and its cost-effectiveness is an important issue. This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of anti-BCMA CAR-T compared to standard antimyeloma therapy in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. The model included myeloma patients in Japan and the United States who have received ≥3 prior lines of antimyeloma therapy, including immunomodulatory drugs, proteasome inhibitors, and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies. A Markov model was constructed to compare the CAR-T strategy, in which patients receive either idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) or ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) followed by 3 lines of multiagent chemotherapy after relapse, and the no CAR-T strategy, in which patients receive only chemotherapy. Data from the LocoMMotion, KarMMa, and CARTITUDE-1 trials were extracted. Several assumptions were made regarding long-term progression-free survival (PFS) with CAR-T. Extensive scenario analyses were made regarding regimens for no CAR-T strategies. The outcome was an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) with willingness-to-pay thresholds of ¥7,500,000 in Japan and $150,000 in the United States. When a 5-year PFS of 40% with cilta-cel was assumed, the ICER of the CAR-T strategy versus the no CAR-T strategy was ¥7,603,823 per QALY in Japan and $112,191 per QALY in the United States over a 10-year time horizon. When a 5-year PFS of 15% with ide-cel was assumed, the ICER was ¥20,388,711 per QALY in Japan and $261,678 per QALY in the United States over a 10-year time horizon. The results were highly dependent on the PFS assumption with CAR-T and were robust to changes in most other parameters and scenarios. Although anti-BCMA CAR-T can be cost-effective even under current pricing, a high long-term PFS is necessary.
Asunto(s)
Mieloma Múltiple , Neoplasias de Células Plasmáticas , Receptores Quiméricos de Antígenos , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Receptores Quiméricos de Antígenos/uso terapéutico , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Tratamiento Basado en Trasplante de Células y TejidosRESUMEN
Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy and bispecific T-cell engagers (BsAb) have emerged as promising immunotherapeutic modalities in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). However, there is limited data on the safety and efficacy of CAR-T and BsAb therapies in MM patients with a prior history of allogeneic transplantation (allo-HCT). Thirty-three MM patients with prior allo-HCT received CAR-T (n = 24) or BsAb (n = 9) therapy. CAR-T therapy demonstrated an ORR of 92% (67% ≥ CR), and 73% were MRD negative. BsAb therapy resulted in an ORR of 44% (44% ≥ CR) and 44% MRD negative. Safety analysis showed grade ≥3 AEs in 92% of CAR-T and 56% of BsAb patients. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) occurred in 83% of CAR-T and 78% of BsAb recipients, while immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) was observed in three CAR-T patients. Infections of grade ≥3 were reported in 50% of CAR-T and 44% of BsAb recipients. No exacerbation of graft-versus-host disease occurred except in one BsAb recipient. CAR-T and BsAb therapies appear to be feasible, safe and provide deep and durable responses in MM patients with prior allo-HCT.
Asunto(s)
Mieloma Múltiple , Neoplasias de Células Plasmáticas , Receptores Quiméricos de Antígenos , Humanos , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva , Trasplante HomólogoRESUMEN
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen), a first-in-class, alkylating peptide-drug conjugate, demonstrated clinical benefit in combination with dexamethasone in triple-class refractory multiple myeloma (MM). The phase I/IIa ANCHOR study evaluated melflufen (30 or 40 mg) and dexamethasone (40 mg with daratumumab; 20 mg followed by 40 mg with bortezomib; dose reduced if aged ≥75 years) in triplet combination with daratumumab (16 mg/kg; daratumumab arm) or bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2; bortezomib arm) in patients with relapsed/refractory MM refractory to an immunomodulatory agent and/or a proteasome inhibitor and who had received one to four prior lines of therapy. Primary objectives were to determine the optimal dose of melflufen in triplet combination (phase I) and overall response rate (phase IIa). In total, 33 patients were treated in the daratumumab arm and 23 patients received therapy in the bortezomib arm. No dose-limiting toxicities were reported at either melflufen dose level with either combination. With both triplet regimens, the most common grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events were thrombocytopenia and neutropenia; thrombocytopenia was the most common treatment-emergent adverse event leading to treatment discontinuation. In the daratumumab arm, patients receiving melflufen 30 mg remained on treatment longer than those receiving the 40-mg dose. In the daratumumab arm, the overall response rate was 73% and median progression-free survival was 12.9 months. Notably, in the bortezomib arm, the overall response rate was 78% and median progression-free survival was 14.7 months. Considering the totality of the data, melflufen 30 mg was established as the recommended dose for use with dexamethasone and daratumumab or bortezomib for future studies in relapsed/refractory MM.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales , Melfalán , Mieloma Múltiple , Neoplasias de Células Plasmáticas , Neutropenia , Fenilalanina , Trombocitopenia , Humanos , Bortezomib/uso terapéutico , Dexametasona/uso terapéutico , Melfalán/análogos & derivados , Mieloma Múltiple/diagnóstico , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Neutropenia/inducido químicamente , Fenilalanina/análogos & derivados , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversosRESUMEN
There is a paucity of granular data on infection risk with B-cell maturation antigen (BMCA) and GPRC5D bispecific antibodies (bsAb) in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). The aim of our multi-institutional study was to characterize the incidence, etiologies, and risk factors of infections from the start of therapy to the last follow-up or 90 days after study exit. A total of 66 patients received BCMA bsAb monotherapy, 15 GPRC5D bsAb monotherapy, and 15 GPRC5D bsAb combination therapy with daratumumab and/or pomalidomide. While the infection rate per 100 days was 0.57 for BCMA bsAb, it was 0.62 for GPRC5D bsAb combination and 0.13 for GPRC5D bsAb monotherapy; P=0.05. The proportion of infections that were grade ≥3 was higher in the BCMA bsAb group compared to the GPRC5D groups (58% vs. 36%; P=0.04). Grade 5 events were observed in 8% (n=8) of the patients, all treated with BCMA bsAb. The 9 month cumulative incidence of any grade of infection was similar in the BCMA and GPRC5D-combination groups (57% and 62%) and significantly higher than in the GPRC5D-mono group (16%); P=0.012. The cumulative incidence of grade ≥3 infections was highest in the BCMA group reaching 54% at 18 months; P=0.06. Multivariate analysis showed that BCMA bsAb therapy or GPRC5D combination therapy, history of previous infections, baseline lymphopenia, and baseline hypogammaglobulinemia were significantly associated with a higher risk of grade ≥3 infections. Our results indicate that BCMA bsAb and GPRC5D-combination therapies in RRMM are associated with higher cumulative incidence of infection and grade ≥3 infection compared to GPRC5D bsAb mono.