Efficacy of pectoral nerve block type II versus thoracic paravertebral block for analgesia in breast cancer surgery.

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound-guided pectoral nerve block type II is a recently proposed technique for postoperative analgesia after breast cancer surgery. The thoracic paravertebral block is widely used for this purpose by decades. The presented study compares the efficacy of these two techniques for postoperative analgesia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty adult women were undergoing unilateral radical mastectomy or quadrantectomy with axillary dissection. The patients were randomized to receive either pectoral nerve block with 30ml ropivacaine 0.375% (Pecs group) or thoracic paravertebral block with 20ml ropivacaine 0.5% (TPVB group). The evaluated variables included pain intensity by the numerical rating scale at 0, 2, 4, 6, 12, 18 and the 24 hours, 24-hour postoperative opioid (promedol) and nonopioid (ketoprofen) consumption and the time to first rescue analgesia. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between both groups in the pain intensity after surgery. Ten (33%) patients from Pecs group and nine (30%) patients from TPVB group did not require any analgesia within the first 24 hours (P = 0.793). The mean postoperative ketoprofen consumption was lower in Pecs group: 63.3 (± 66.87) mg vs. 90.0 (± 84.49) mg (Р = 0.283). The number of patients who required promedol was 6 (20%) vs. 8 (27%) in Pecs and TPVB groups, respectively (Р = 0.542). The time to first analgesic request was longer in Pecs group, 550 (400.0-600.0) min vs. 510 (360.0-600.0) min (Р = 0.506) in TPVB group. CONCLUSIONS: In breast cancer surgery, the pectoral nerve block type II with ropivacaine 0.375% can provide postoperative analgesia that is comparable to the single-level thoracic paravertebral block.

Evaluation of Pectoral Nerve Block in Modified Radical Mastectomy: Comparison of Three Concentrations of Ropivacaine.

BACKGROUND: Pectoral nerve block type I (PECS I Block) and type II (PECS II Block) with ropivacaine are relatively new analgesic methods for breast-cancer surgery. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of different concentrations of ropivacaine given in the same volume for the PECS II Block in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy (MRM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and twenty women undergoing elective MRM who met inclusion criteria were divided randomly into four groups of 30: control group without PECS II Block and R0.2%, R0.3%, and R0.4% groups, who received general anesthesia plus the PECS II Block with ropivacaine at 0.2%, 0.3%, and 0.4%, respectively, in a volume of 40 mL. RESULTS: The postoperative numerical rating scale (NRS) pain score at rest and active was significantly higher in the control group than that in the three ropivacaine groups (P<0.05 for all), and the postoperative NRS score in the R0.3% group and R0.4% group at 12, 24, and 48 h postoperatively were significantly lower than that in the R0.2% group (P<0.05 for all); there was no significant difference between the R0.3% group and R0.4% group. The time when pain was first felt after MRM, the total number of complaints during 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h after MRM, and the total analgesic requirement (tramadol consumption) during the first 24 h postoperatively in the R0.3% group and R0.4% group were significantly lower than those in the control group and R0.2% group (P<0.05 for all); there was no significant difference between the R0.3% group and R0.4% group. CONCLUSION: A dose of 0.3% ropivacaine was the optimal concentration for a PECS II Block for patients undergoing MRM because it provided efficacious analgesia during and >48 h after MRM. Increasing the ropivacaine concentration did not improve the analgesia of the PECS II Block significantly.

Comparison of pectoral Nerve (PECS1) block with combined PECS1 and transversus thoracis muscle (TTM) block in patients undergoing cardiac implantable electronic device insertion - A pilot study.

Background: Pectoral nerve (PECS1) block has been used for patients undergoing cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) insertions, however, PECS1 block alone may lead to inadequate analgesia during tunneling and pocket creation because of the highly innervated chest wall. Transversus thoracis muscle plane (TTM) block targeting the anterior branches of T2-T6 intercostal nerves can be effectively used in combination with PECS1 for patients undergoing CIED insertion. The present study hypothesized that combined PECS1 and TTM blocks would provide effective analgesia for patients undergoing CIED insertion compared to PECS1 block alone. Materials and Methods: Thirty adult patients between the age group of 18-85 years undergoing CIED insertion were enrolled in the study. A prospective, randomized, comparative, pilot study was conducted. A total of 30 patients were enrolled, who were randomized to either Group P: PECS1 block (n = 15) or Group PT: PECS1 and TTM blocks (n = 15). The intraoperative requirement of midazolam and local anesthetic and level of sedation by Ramsay sedation score were noted. The pain was assessed by visual analog scale (VAS) at rest and during a cough or deep breathing at 0 h, 3 h, 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h after the procedure. Results: VAS scores at rest were significantly lower in group PT at 0, 3, 6, and 12 h postprocedure, and during cough at 0, 6, and 12 h after the procedure (P < 0.05). At 24 h, VAS scores were comparable between both groups. Intraoperative midazolam consumption was higher in group P compared to group PT (P= 0.002). Fourteen patients in group P received local anesthetic supplementation in comparison to only one patient in group PT (P = 0.0001). Thirteen patients in group P received the first rescue analgesia in comparison to three patients in group PT (P = 0.0003). Conclusion: Combined PECS1 and TTM blocks provide superior analgesia, reduced net consumption of local anesthetic, sedative agents, and rescue analgesics compared to PECS1 block alone in patients undergoing CIED insertion.

Quality of Recovery After Breast Surgery: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Pectoral Nerves Interfascial Plane (Pectoral Nerves II) Block With Surgical Infiltration.

BACKGROUND: Pectoral nerves (PECS II) block is a popular regional analgesia technique for breast surgery. PECS II block or local infiltration by surgeon may improve outcomes including quality of recovery (QoR). METHODS: In this multicenter randomized clinical trial, 104 female patients undergoing breast surgery received: (1) PECS II block with local anesthetic and surgical infiltration with 0.9% saline (PECS group) or (2) PECS II block with 0.9% saline and surgical infiltration with local anesthetic (infiltration group). Patients, anesthetists, surgeons, nursing staff, and research assistants were blinded to group allocation. Patients received standardized general anesthesia and multimodal analgesia. The primary outcome was the global score (maximum score, 150; good recovery, 118) of the multidimensional (pain, comfort, independence, psychological, emotional) QoR-15 questionnaire measured 24 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were pain, and its functional interference measured 24 hours and 3 months postoperatively using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) short form (0, optimal; 120, worst possible). Randomly assigned groups were compared on outcomes using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and the results were reported as median difference with 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: One hundred eight patients were recruited from August 17, 2016 to June 8, 2018, and 4 patients were withdrawn. Twelve patients from 104 had mastectomy, with the remainder having less invasive surgery. Baseline QoR-15 global scores reported as median [quartiles] were 135 [129, 143] in the PECS group and 139 [127, 143] in the infiltration group. The 24-hour QoR-15 global score reported as median [quartiles] was 131 [116, 140] in the PECS group and 123 [117, 143] in the infiltration group (P = .60), with median difference (95% confidence interval) of -2 (-9 to 5). The median difference reported as infiltration minus PECS for QoR-15 domains was pain 0 (-2 to 1), physical comfort -1 (-3 to 2), physical independence 0 (-2 to 1), psychological support 0 (0-0), and emotions 0 (-1 to 2) (P > .28). The BPI pain subscale at 24 hours (0-40, lower score indicates less pain), reported as median [quartiles], was 7 [2, 13] in the PECS group and 10 [5, 17] in the infiltration group (P = .15). The BPI global score at 24 hours, reported as median [quartiles], was 20 [7, 36] in the PECS group and 23 [10, 43] in the infiltration group (P = .34) and at 3 months was 0 [0, 14] and 0 [0, 11] (P = .85). CONCLUSIONS: After mostly minor surgery for breast cancer, PECS II block was not superior to local infiltration by the surgeon.

Regional anesthesia considerations for cardiac surgery.

Pain is a significant consequence of cardiac surgery and newer techniques in cardiac anesthesia have provided an impetus for the development of multimodal techniques to manage acute pain in this setting. In this regard, regional anesthesia techniques have been increasingly used in many cardiac surgical procedures, for the purposes of reducing perioperative consumption of opioid agents and enhanced recovery after surgery. The present investigation focuses on most currently used regional techniques in cardiac surgical procedures. These regional techniques include chest wall blocks (e.g., PECS I and II, SAP, ESB, PVB), sternal blocks (e.g., TTMPB, PSINB), and neuraxial blocks (e.g., TEA, high spinal anesthesia). The present investigation also summarizes indications, technique, complications, and potential clinical benefits of these evolving regional techniques. Cardiac surgery patients may benefit from application of these regional techniques with well controlled indications and careful patient selections.

Pectoral nerve block as the sole anesthetic technique for a modified radical mastectomy in a comorbid patient.

Breast surgery operations are generally performed by general anesthesia. In order to decrease postoperative pain, regional anesthesia is usually combined with general anesthesia. Pectoral nerve blocks is a novel technique to provide perioperative and postoperative pain control for patients underwent breast surgery. We performed pectoral nerve block I and pectoral nerve block II as a sole anesthetic technique with sedation by dexmedetomidine for modified radical mastectomy, for a 75-year-old female patient with multiple diseases. Pectoral nerve blocks with sedation could be a good technique for breast surgery than general anesthesia in comorbid patients.

Bloqueo del plano del erector espinal como analgesia en fracturas costales múltiples unilaterales / Erector spinae plane block for multiple unilateral ribs fractures

Las fracturas costales son lesiones comunes, estando presentes en el 10 % de los pacientes con trauma cerrado de tórax. No es una patología grave, pero puede comportarse como un buen indicador de morbimortalidad en el paciente que las padece. El riesgo de complicaciones, especialmente el compromiso de la mecánica pulmonar del paciente afectado, hace imperativo lograr un control óptimo del dolor, lo que convierte a la analgesia multimodal en un pilar importante en el manejo de esta entidad, constituyendo el uso de bloqueos con anestésico local un aspecto importante. Recientemente se ha descrito la utilización del bloqueo del músculo erector espinal con fines analgésicos dado su alcance anatómico; esta técnica se ha implementado para el manejo de varios síndromes dolorosos con buenos resultados. Este artículo describe el uso del bloqueo del erector espinal para el control analgésico en un paciente con fracturas de tórax secundarias a un politraumatismo

Rib fractures are common lesions, being present in 10% of patients with closed chest trauma. It is not a serious pathology, but it is an indicator of morbidity and mortality. The risk complications, specially the pulmonary mechanics compromise of the affected patient makes it imperative to achieve optimal pain control. What makes multimodal analgesia an important pillar in the management of this entity, within this, the blocks with local anesthetic use, play an important role. Recently, the erector spinae plan block (ESP) with different analgesic purposes has been described given its anatomical coverage. This technique has been implemented for management of several painful syndromes and compromises with considerable success. This report attempts to describe the erector spinae plan block for analgesic control in a patient with several thorax fractures secondary to multiple trauma

Combinación de bloqueos torácicos como método anestésico principal en mastectomía radical modificada para pacientes con compromiso respiratorio severo / Combination of thoracic blocks as a main anesthetic tecnique in modified radical mastectomy for patients with severe respiratory disease

En los últimos tiempos la incorporación de la ultrasonografía a las técnicas de anestesia locorregional ha permitido la descripción de diversos bloqueos torácicos fasciales con finalidad analgésica: PECS 1 y 2, bloqueo del plano del serrato, bloqueo fascial intercostal serrato, bloqueo en el plano del músculo transverso torácico..., que se han añadido a otros bloqueos nerviosos ya conocidos como el bloqueo paravertebral torácico o el bloqueo intercostal. En este sentido, las técnicas de anestesia locorregional han sido universalmente recomendadas en pacientes con procesos respiratorios severos para evitar el soporte ventilatorio y posterior destete que incrementan considerablemente las tasas de morbimortalidad postoperatoria. Sin embargo, a nivel de la pared torácica y hueco axilar, son escasas las referencias que identifiquen el uso de bloqueos nerviosos o fasciales como método anestésico principal. Presentamos 2 casos extremos de pacientes pluripatológicos con serio compromiso respiratorio que se someten de forma exitosa a mastectomía radical modificada más cirugía en el hueco axilar mediante una combinación de bloqueos torácicos ecoguiados que permitieron la cirugía sin necesidad de inducir anestesia general, evitando ventilación mecánica, y manteniendo durante todo el procedimiento quirúrgico y postoperatorio respiración espontánea. Describimos las principales indicaciones de los bloqueos anestésicos empleados, incidiendo en la técnica de realización de los mismos y subrayando de forma novedosa la posibilidad de afrontar una cirugía agresiva a nivel de la axila con solo anestesia locorregional

The addition of ultrasound to locoregional anaesthesia in the last few years has led to the description of various fascial thoracic blocks with analgesic purposes: PECS 1 and 2 block, serratus plane block, serratus intercostal fascial block, blockade in the plane of the thoracic transverse muscle..., which have been added to other well-known nerve blocks, such as thoracic paravertebral block or intercostal block. In this sense, locoregional anaesthesia has been universally recommended in patients with severe respiratory processes in order to avoid ventilatory support and subsequent weaning that considerably increases postoperative morbidity and mortality rates. However, as regards thoracic wall and axillary hollow, there are very few references which detail the use of nerve or fascial blocks as a main anaesthetic method. Two extreme cases are presented of multi-pathological patients with serious respiratory disease who successfully underwent a modified radical mastectomy plus surgery in the axillary space using a combination of ultrasound-guided thoracic blocks that allowed surgery without general anaesthesia, avoiding mechanical ventilation, and maintaining spontaneous breathing throughout the surgical procedure. The main indications of the anaesthetic blocks used are described, focusing on the performance of the technique and underlining, in a novel way, the possibility of facing aggressive surgery at the level of the armpit with only locoregional anaesthesia

Comparison of the effects of modified pectoral nerve block and erector spinae plane block on postoperative opioid consumption and pain scores of patients after radical mastectomy surgery: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Breast cancer is the most common malignancy of women all over the world. In this study, we compared the effects of ultrasound-guided modified pectoral nerve (PECS) block and erector spinae plane (ESP) block on postoperative opioid consumption, pain scores, and intraoperative fentanyl need of patients undergoing unilateral modified radical mastectomy surgery. DESIGN: Single-blinded, prospective, randomized, efficacy study. SETTING: Tertiary university hospital, postoperative recovery room and surgical ward. PATIENTS: Forty patients (ASA I-II) were allocated to two groups. After exclusion, 38 patients were included in the final analysis (18 patients in the PECS groups and 20 in the ESP group). INTERVENTIONS: Modified pectoral nerve block was performed in the PECS group and erector spinae plane block was performed in the ESP group. MEASUREMENTS: Postoperative tramadol consumption and pain scores were compared between the groups. Also, intraoperative fentanyl need was measured. MAIN RESULTS: Postoperative tramadol consumption was 132.78 ±â€¯22.44 mg in PECS group and 196 ±â€¯27.03 mg in ESP group (p = 0.001). NRS scores at the 15th and 30th min were similar between the groups. However, median NRS scores were significantly lower in PECS group at the postoperative 60th min, 120th min, 12th hour and 24th hour (p = 0.024, p = 0.018, p = 0.021 and p = 0.011 respectively). Intraoperative fentanyl need was 75 mg in PECS group and 87.5 mg in ESP group. The difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.263). CONCLUSION: Modified PECS block reduced postoperative tramadol consumption and pain scores more effectively than ESP block after radical mastectomy surgery.

From Bedside to Bench: The Effect of Muscular Denervation on Fat Grafting to the Breast by Comparing Take Rate, Quality, and Longevity.

BACKGROUND: Autologous fat grafting (AFG) to the breast is a frequent procedure in aesthetic and reconstructive surgery. Despite pure volume gain, questions remain regarding the engraftment rate, quality, and longevity. Little is known about the role of recipient tissue or innervation of the grafted area. OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to determine the optimal recipient layer and muscular pretreatment of AFG. METHODS: Fat was grafted to the breast, pectoralis muscle, or adjacent subcutaneous tissue of 42 rats. Nerve treatment included excision of a nerve segment, botulinum toxin (BTX) injection, or no treatment. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and histological workup were carried out after 2 and 6 weeks. RESULTS: Six weeks after AFG, the proportion of viable fat cells within the grafted fat stayed high (median, [IQR]: 81% [72% to 85%]). The signs of inflammation decreased over time. Intramuscular grafting with intact nerves had a decreasing effect on the viability of the grafted cells compared with subcutaneous treatment (-10.21%; 95% confidence interval [-21.1 to 0.68]). CONCLUSIONS: If utilized on an intact nerve, intramuscular injection may lead to inferior results. If the nerve was cut or treated with BTX; however, intramuscular injection tends to be superior. These findings may prove interesting for future studies and eventual clinical application.