Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 136
Filtrar
1.
Crit Care Med ; 50(3): 460-468, 2022 03 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34534129

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Multiple randomized controlled trials exploring the outcomes of patients with ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia and hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia have noted that hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia patients who require subsequent ventilated hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia suffered higher mortality than either those who did not (nonventilated hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia) or had ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia. We examined the epidemiology and outcomes of all three conditions in a large U.S. database. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Two hundred fifty-three acute-care hospitals, United States, contributing data (including microbiology) to Premier database, 2012-2019. PATIENTS: Patients with hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia or ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia identified based on a slightly modified previously published International Classification of Diseases, 9th Edition/International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition-Clinical Modification algorithm. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Among 17,819 patients who met enrollment criteria, 26.5% had nonventilated hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia, 25.6% vHAPB, and 47.9% ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia. Ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia predominated in the Northeastern United States and in large urban teaching hospitals. Patients with nonventilated hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia were oldest (mean 66.7 ± 15.1 yr) and most likely White (76.9%), whereas those with ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia were youngest (59.7 ± 16.6 yr) and least likely White (70.3%). Ventilated hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia was associated with the highest comorbidity burden (mean Charlson score 4.1 ± 2.8) and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia with the lowest (3.2 ± 2.5). Similarly, hospital mortality was highest among patients with ventilated hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (29.2%) and lowest in nonventilated hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (11.7%), with ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia in-between (21.3%). Among survivors, 24.5% of nonventilated hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia required a rehospitalization within 30 days of discharge, compared with 22.5% among ventilated hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia and 18.8% ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia. Unadjusted hospital length of stay after infection onset was longest among ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia and shortest among nonventilated hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia patients. Median total hospital costs mirrored length of stay: ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia $77,657, ventilated hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia $62,464, and nonventilated hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia $39,911. CONCLUSIONS: Both hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia remain associated with significant mortality and cost in the United States. Our analyses confirm that of all three conditions, ventilated hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia carries the highest risk of death. In contrast, ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia remains most costly. Nonventilated hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia survivors were most likely to require a readmission within 30 days of discharge.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica/epidemiología , Neumonía Bacteriana/epidemiología , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/epidemiología , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Adulto , Costo de Enfermedad , Infección Hospitalaria/economía , Femenino , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica/economía , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Neumonía Bacteriana/economía , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
2.
Front Immunol ; 11: 303, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32194556

RESUMEN

The incidence and number of deaths from non-tuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) disease have been steadily increasing globally. These lesser known "cousins" of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (TB) were once thought to be harmless environmental saprophytics and only dangerous to individuals with defective lung structure or the immunosuppressed. However, NTM are now commonly infecting seemingly immune competent children and adults at increasing rates through pulmonary infection. This is of concern as the pathology of NTM is difficult to treat. Indeed, NTM have become extremely antibiotic resistant, and now have been found to be internationally dispersed through person-to-person contact. The reasons behind this NTM increase are only beginning to be elucidated. Solutions to the problem are needed given NTM disease is more common in the tropics. Importantly, 40% of the world's population live in the tropics and due to climate change, the Tropics are expanding which will increase NTM infection regions. This review catalogs the global and economic disease burden, at risk populations, treatment options, host-bacterial interaction, immune dynamics, recent developments and research priorities for NTM disease.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Mycobacterium no Tuberculosas/epidemiología , Neumonía Bacteriana/epidemiología , Distribución por Edad , Cambio Climático , Costo de Enfermedad , Salud Global , Interacciones Huésped-Patógeno , Humanos , Infecciones por Mycobacterium no Tuberculosas/economía , Infecciones por Mycobacterium no Tuberculosas/inmunología , Infecciones por Mycobacterium no Tuberculosas/microbiología , Infecciones Oportunistas/economía , Infecciones Oportunistas/epidemiología , Infecciones Oportunistas/inmunología , Infecciones Oportunistas/microbiología , Neumonía Bacteriana/economía , Neumonía Bacteriana/inmunología , Neumonía Bacteriana/microbiología , Investigación , Riesgo , Distribución por Sexo , Clima Tropical , Microbiología del Agua
3.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 102(4): 731-739, 2020 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32067631

RESUMEN

Pneumonia remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in young children. The total cost of pneumonia-related hospitalization, including household-level cost, is poorly understood. To better understand this burden in an urban setting in South America, we incorporated a cost study into a trial assessing zinc supplements in treatment of severe pneumonia among children aged 2-59 months at a public hospital in Quito, Ecuador, which provides such treatment at no charge. Data were collected from children's caregivers at hospitalization and discharge on out-of-pocket payments for medical and nonmedical items, and on employment and lost work time. Analyses encompassed three categories: direct medical costs, direct nonmedical costs, and indirect costs, which covered foregone wages (from caregivers' self-reported lost earnings) and opportunity cost of caregivers' lost time (based on the unskilled labor wage in Ecuador). Caregivers of 153 children completed all questionnaires. Overall, 57% of children were aged less than 12 months, and 46% were female. Just over 50% of mothers and fathers had completed middle school. Most reported direct costs, which averaged $33. Most also reported indirect costs, the mean of which was $74. Fifty-seven reported lost earnings (mean = $79); 29 reported lost time (estimated mean cost = $37). Stratified analyses revealed similar costs for children < 12 months and ≥ 12 months, with variations for specific items. Costs for hospital-based treatment of severe pneumonia in young children represent a major burden for households in low- to middle-income settings, even when such treatment is intended to be provided at no cost.


Asunto(s)
Composición Familiar , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Neumonía Bacteriana/economía , Neumonía Bacteriana/epidemiología , Preescolar , Costo de Enfermedad , Recolección de Datos , Ecuador/epidemiología , Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/economía , Humanos , Factores Socioeconómicos
4.
BMC Infect Dis ; 19(1): 1028, 2019 Dec 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31795953

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pseudomonas aeruginosa-related pneumonia is an ongoing healthcare challenge. Estimating its financial burden is complicated by the time-dependent nature of the disease. METHODS: Two hundred thirty-six cases of Pseudomonas aeruginosa-related pneumonia were recorded at a 2000 bed German teaching hospital between 2011 and 2014. Thirty-five cases (15%) were multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Hospital- and community-acquired cases were distinguished by main diagnoses and exposure time. The impact of Pseudomonas aeruginosa-related pneumonia on the three endpoints cost, reimbursement, and length of stay was analyzed, taking into account (1) the time-dependent nature of exposure, (2) clustering of costs within diagnostic groups, and (3) additional confounders. RESULTS: Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia is associated with substantial additional costs that are not fully reimbursed. Costs are highest for hospital-acquired cases (€19,000 increase over uninfected controls). However, community-acquired cases are also associated with a substantial burden (€8400 when Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia is the main reason for hospitalization, and €6700 when not). Sensitivity analyses for hospital-acquired cases showed that ignoring or incorrectly adjusting for time-dependency substantially biases results. Furthermore, multidrug-resistance was rare and only showed a measurable impact on the cost of community-acquired cases. CONCLUSIONS: Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia creates a substantial financial burden for hospitals. This is particularly the case for nosocomial infections. Infection control interventions could yield significant cost reductions. However, to evaluate the potential effectiveness of different interventions, the time-dependent aspects of incremental costs must be considered to avoid introduction of bias.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/economía , Infección Hospitalaria/economía , Costos de Hospital , Hospitalización/economía , Neumonía Bacteriana/economía , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/economía , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infección Hospitalaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Femenino , Alemania , Hospitales de Enseñanza , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neumonía Bacteriana/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/microbiología
6.
Int J Clin Pharm ; 40(5): 1051-1058, 2018 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30117080

RESUMEN

Background Gram negative pathogens are increasingly resistant to commonly used first line antibiotics and colistin is in most cases the only medicine available. There is very limited information available comparing the effectiveness and costs of low versus high dose colistin with studies showing efficacy with both doses and with variable levels of adverse effects. The absence of a definite dosing strategy makes a model to compare low dose and high dose colistin invaluable in making decisions regarding the appropriate use of colistin. Objective This study was designed to evaluate the cost effectiveness of low versus high dose colistin in the treatment of Pneumonia caused by colistin-only sensitive gram negative bacteria from the perspective of a tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia. Setting 300-bed tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia. Method A retrospective review was conducted to compare the costs and outcomes of treatment of pneumonia with low versus high dose colistin. The model followed an average patient from initiation of treatment until clinical cure or failure. Main outcome measures The main outcomes were cure, nephrotoxicity, total direct costs per episode, cost per additional cure and cost per nephrotoxicity avoided. Results There was no significant difference between high and low dose colistin with regards to clinical cure (30% vs. 21%; p = 0.292). Significantly more patients experienced nephrotoxicity with high versus low dose colistin (30% vs. 8%; p = 0.004). With low dose colistin the incremental costs per nephrotoxicity avoided was SAR-3056.28. One-way sensitivity analyses did not change the overall results. Conclusion Low dose was not inferior to high dose colistin in terms of clinical cure and had a lower incidence of nephrotoxicity resulting in significant cost avoidance.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/economía , Colistina/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio/métodos , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple/efectos de los fármacos , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica/economía , Neumonía Bacteriana/economía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas/métodos , Colistina/farmacología , Colistina/uso terapéutico , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/economía , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/epidemiología , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neumonía Bacteriana/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía Bacteriana/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Arabia Saudita/epidemiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
Clin Infect Dis ; 66(1): 72-80, 2018 01 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29020279

RESUMEN

Background: Studies indicate that the prevalence of multidrug-resistant infections, including hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (HABP/VABP), has been rising. There are many challenges associated with these disease conditions and the ability to develop new treatments. Additionally, HABP/VABP clinical trials are very costly to conduct given their complex protocol designs and the difficulty in recruiting and retaining patients. Methods: With input from clinicians, representatives from industry, and the US Food and Drug Administration, we conducted a study to (1) evaluate the drivers of HABP/VABP phase 3 direct and indirect clinical trial costs; (2) to identify opportunities to lower these costs; and (3) to compare (1) and (2) to endocrine and oncology clinical trials. Benchmark data were gathered from proprietary and commercial databases and used to create a model that calculates the fully loaded (direct and indirect) cost of typical phase 3 HABP/VABP endocrine and oncology clinical trials. Results: Results indicate that the cost per patient for a 200-site, 1000-patient phase 3 HABP/VABP study is $89600 per patient. The cost of screen failures and screen failure rates are the main cost drivers. Conclusions: Results indicate that biopharmaceutical companies and regulatory agencies should consider strategies to improve screening and recruitment to decrease HABP/VABP clinical trial costs.


Asunto(s)
Ensayos Clínicos Fase III como Asunto , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica/terapia , Neumonía Bacteriana/terapia , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/terapia , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica/economía , Hospitales , Humanos , Neumonía Bacteriana/economía , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/economía
8.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 51(4): 601-607, 2018 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29277527

RESUMEN

The financial burden of antibiotic resistance is a serious concern worldwide. The aim of this study was to describe the excess costs associated with pneumonia, bacteraemia, surgical site infections and intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli in Medellín, Colombia, an endemic region for carbapenem resistance. A cohort study was conducted in a third-level hospital from 2014-2015. All patients with carbapenem-resistant and carbapenem-susceptible Gram-negative bacterial infections were included. Pharmaceutical, medical and surgical direct costs were described from the health system perspective. Excess costs were estimated from generalised linear models with gamma distribution and adjusted for variables that could affect the cost difference. A total of 218 patients were enrolled, 48 (22.0%) of whom were infected with carbapenem-resistant bacteria. IAIs were the most frequent. The adjusted total excess cost was US$3966 [95% confidence interval (CI) US$1684-6249], with a significantly higher cost for antibiotics, followed by hospital stay, laboratory tests and interconsultation. The highest excess cost was attributed mainly to the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics (US$1827, 95% CI US$1005-2648), followed by length of hospital stay (US$1015, 95% CI US$163-1867). The results of this study highlight the importance of designing antimicrobial stewardship programmes and infection control strategies in endemic regions to reduce the financial threat of antimicrobial resistance to health systems.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia/economía , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Infecciones Intraabdominales/economía , Neumonía Bacteriana/economía , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/economía , Anciano , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Carbapenémicos/uso terapéutico , Colombia , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Enterobacter cloacae/efectos de los fármacos , Femenino , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/microbiología , Humanos , Infecciones Intraabdominales/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Intraabdominales/microbiología , Klebsiella pneumoniae/efectos de los fármacos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neumonía Bacteriana/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía Bacteriana/microbiología , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efectos de los fármacos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/tratamiento farmacológico , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/microbiología
9.
Hosp Pract (1995) ; 45(1): 1-8, 2017 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28064542

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The current treatment options for patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) often present a trade-off between the potential for treatment failure and safety concerns. We set out to investigate real-world outcomes associated with the use of currently available antimicrobial treatment options for CAP in both the outpatient and inpatient (non-intensive care unit [ICU]) settings. METHODS: This claims-based retrospective study included adult patients diagnosed with CAP and treated with antibiotic therapies, including any oral fluoroquinolone, macrolide, or beta-lactam monotherapy in the outpatient setting, and intravenous (IV) levofloxacin or IV azithromycin/ceftriaxone in the inpatient setting. Generalized linear model (GLM) regression was used to determine total charges for inpatient stay, the length of stay, and days of inpatient therapy. For outpatients, rates of adverse events (AEs), treatment failure, and hospitalization were compared by type of initial antibiotic therapy using logistic regression multivariate models that controlled for baseline characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 441,820 outpatients and 33,287 inpatients treated for CAP between 2007 and 2012 were included in this analysis. In the outpatient setting, fluoroquinolone therapy led to a higher rate of documented AEs (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 1.23; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.20-1.25; p < 0.0001) but a lower rate of retreatment (adjusted OR: 0.9; 95% CI: 0.87-0.94; p < 0.0001) compared with macrolides. Both AEs and retreatment in these patients were associated with increased costs. For patients treated with the IV macrolide/beta-lactam combination compared with IV fluoroquinolone in the inpatient setting, a significantly longer length of stay in hospital (4.71 vs. 4.38 days; p < 0.0001) and greater overall costs ($3,535 more per stay; p < 0.0001) were observed. CONCLUSION: In both the inpatient and outpatient settings, the development of additional efficacious treatment options that have a reduced AE burden for patients with CAP may be warranted.


Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria/economía , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/economía , Neumonía Bacteriana/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía Bacteriana/economía , Adulto , Anciano , Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Antibacterianos/economía , Azitromicina/uso terapéutico , Ceftriaxona/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ofloxacino/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo
10.
BMC Infect Dis ; 17(1): 52, 2017 01 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28068956

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To determine the cost-effectiveness of strategies of preferred antibiotic treatment with beta-lactam/macrolide combination or fluoroquinolone monotherapy compared to beta-lactam monotherapy. METHODS: Costs and effects were estimated using data from a cluster-randomized cross-over trial of antibiotic treatment strategies, primarily from the reduced third payer perspective (i.e. hospital admission costs). Cost-minimization analysis (CMA) and cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) were performed using linear mixed models. CMA results were expressed as difference in costs per patient. CEA results were expressed as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) showing additional costs per prevented death. RESULTS: A total of 2,283 patients were included. Crude average costs within 90 days from the reduced third payer perspective were €4,294, €4,392, and €4,002 per patient for the beta-lactam monotherapy, beta-lactam/macrolide combination, and fluoroquinolone monotherapy strategy, respectively. CMA results were €106 (95% CI €-697 to €754) for the beta-lactam/macrolide combination strategy and €-278 (95%CI €-991 to €396) for the fluoroquinolone monotherapy strategy, both compared to the beta-lactam monotherapy strategy. The ICER was not statistically significantly different between the strategies. Other perspectives yielded similar results. CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences in cost-effectiveness of strategies of preferred antibiotic treatment of CAP on non-ICU wards with either beta-lactam monotherapy, beta-lactam/macrolide combination therapy, or fluoroquinolone monotherapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01660204 , on May 2nd, 2012.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía Bacteriana/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antibacterianos/economía , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Estudios Cruzados , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Fluoroquinolonas/economía , Fluoroquinolonas/uso terapéutico , Hospitalización , Humanos , Macrólidos/economía , Macrólidos/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos , Neumonía Bacteriana/economía , beta-Lactamas/economía , beta-Lactamas/uso terapéutico
11.
Vaccine ; 35(3): 435-442, 2017 01 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27989625

RESUMEN

By September 2013, war between Sudan and South Sudan resulted in >70,000 Sudanese refugees and high pneumonia incidence among the 20,000 refugees in Yida camp, South Sudan. Using Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF)-provided data and modifying our decision-tree models, we estimated if administering Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib)-containing (pentavalent vaccine, also with diphtheria pertussis and tetanus [DPT] and hepatitis B) and pneumococcal conjugate (PCV) vaccines were cost-effective against hospitalized pneumonia. Among children <2years old, compared with no vaccination, one- and two-doses of combined Hib-containing and PCV would avert an estimated 118 and 125 pneumonia cases, and 8.5 and 9.1 deaths, respectively. The cost per Disability-Adjusted-Life-Year averted for administering combined one- and two-doses was US$125 and US$209, respectively. MSF demonstrated that it was possible to administer these vaccines during an emergency and our analysis found it was highly cost-effective, even with just one-dose of either vaccine. Despite unknown etiology, there is strong field and now economic rationale for administering Hib and PCV during at least one humanitarian emergency.


Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Vacuna contra Difteria, Tétanos y Tos Ferina/economía , Vacuna contra Difteria, Tétanos y Tos Ferina/inmunología , Vacunas contra Haemophilus/economía , Vacunas contra Haemophilus/inmunología , Vacunas contra Hepatitis B/economía , Vacunas contra Hepatitis B/inmunología , Vacunas Neumococicas/economía , Vacunas Neumococicas/inmunología , Neumonía Bacteriana/economía , Neumonía Bacteriana/prevención & control , Vacuna contra Difteria, Tétanos y Tos Ferina/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra Haemophilus/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra Hepatitis B/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Vacunas Neumococicas/administración & dosificación , Refugiados , Sudán del Sur , Vacunas Conjugadas/administración & dosificación , Vacunas Conjugadas/economía , Vacunas Conjugadas/inmunología
12.
Klin Mikrobiol Infekc Lek ; 22(1): 4-12, 2016 Mar.
Artículo en Checo | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27476589

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Important hospital-acquired infections include pneumonia, mainly because of the increasing resistance of bacterial pathogens to antimicrobials and the associated potential failure of antibiotic therapy. The present study aimed at determining the most frequent etiological agents of hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and assessing the relationship between 30-day mortality and adequacy of antibiotic therapy. Based on the obtained information, optimal patterns of antibiotic therapy were to be defined, including a pharmacoeconomic perspective. METHODS: In patients with clinically confirmed HAP, bacterial etiological agents were identified, their susceptibility to antimicrobials was determined and statistical methods were used to assess the relationship between adequacy of antibiotic therapy and 30-day mortality. RESULTS: The study comprised 68 patients with clinically confirmed HAP. The most common etiological agents were strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (30.8 %), Klebsiella pneumoniae (23.1 %) and Burkholderia cepacia complex (15.4 %). Gram-negative bacteria accounted for 86.5 % of all bacterial pathogens. The overall mortality reached 42.5 %. In the subgroup of patients with inadequate antibiotic therapy, 30-day mortality was significantly higher (83.3 %) than in the subgroup with adequate therapy (30.0 %; p = 0.002). The risk for 30-day mortality was 2.78 times higher in case of inadequate antibiotic therapy (95%CI: 1.52-5.07). The proportion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains was significantly higher in the subgroup of patients with inadequate antibiotic therapy than in those with adequate therapy (67 % vs. 27 %; p = 0.032). CONCLUSION: Results of the present study suggest a significant relationship between mortality of patients with HAP and ineffective antibiotic therapy due to resistance of the bacterial pathogen. Thus, it is clear that initial antibiotic therapy must be based on qualified assumption of sufficient activity against the most common bacterial pathogens and results of surveillance of bacterial resistance in the relevant epidemiological unit. At the same time, however, it must be stressed that it is impossible to cover all potential variants of the etiological agents and their resistance phenotypes.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/economía , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infección Hospitalaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Economía Farmacéutica , Neumonía Bacteriana/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía Bacteriana/economía , Anciano , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana/efectos de los fármacos , Femenino , Bacterias Gramnegativas/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neumonía Bacteriana/microbiología
13.
J Microbiol Immunol Infect ; 49(5): 654-662, 2016 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25553993

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Slowly resolving pneumonia (SRP) poses early challenges for identification and medical expense for clinicians in intensive care units (ICUs); to date, the literature has been very limited in this regard. METHODS: This was a retrospective and cohort-based study in the ICU of a university-affiliated hospital in Shanghai. Medical records of pneumonia patients in the ICU between April 2008 and February 2011were reviewed retrospectively to evaluate the risk factors for SRP. RESULTS: In all, 106 pneumonia patients in the ICU were identified as immune-competent with a diagnosis of bacterial pneumonia. There were 62 (58.49%) patients who showed SRP and their radiographic infiltrations were completely resolved between 5 weeks and 8 weeks. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that initial treatment with an inappropriate antibiotic, multilobar infiltration, and a high CURB-65 score were independent risk factors for SRP, with odds ratio (OR) values of 8.338 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.117-32.848], 11.184 (95% CI 2.526-49.514), and 2.329 (95% CI 1.172-4.626), respectively. The length of the ICU stay in the SRP group was twice as long as that of the normally resolving pneumonia (NRP) group (62.27 ± 73.73 vs. 32.25 ± 23, p = 0.002). The 28-day and 60-day mortality rates in the SRP group were 17.74% and 25.81%, respectively. In addition, the 60-day mortality rate was significantly higher in the SRP group than the NRP group (25.81% vs. 6.82%, respectively; p = 0.012). Moreover, SRP was an independent risk factor for 60-day mortality (OR 5.687, 95% CI 1.334-24.240). CONCLUSION: Treatment with an inappropriate antibiotic, multilobar infiltration, and a high CURB-65 score were independent risk factors for SRP.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Errores de Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Neumonía Bacteriana/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Enfermedad Crítica/economía , Femenino , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/economía , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Neumonía Bacteriana/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
14.
Rev Mal Respir ; 32(8): 845-9, 2015 Oct.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26204800

RESUMEN

Urinary antigen tests are quick and simple tests helping to provide an etiological diagnosis in community-acquired pneumonia. However, their prescription is sometimes excessive and performed in unjustified situations. The therapeutic benefit is limited. Indeed, studies show that appropriate antibiotic therapy based on the result of urinary antigen tests does not improve the cost and the patient survival compared to empirical antibiotic therapy. One must be careful before antibiotic therapy reduction based on the sole negative result of urinary antigen test. Legionella urinary antigen test is the most commonly method used for the diagnosis of legionellosis but must be prescribed in a specific clinical context. Streptococcus pneumoniae urinary antigen test is especially interesting in the epidemiological surveillance of pneumococcal community-acquired pneumonia.


Asunto(s)
Antígenos Bacterianos/orina , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/orina , Neumonía Bacteriana/orina , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Cromatografía de Afinidad/economía , Cromatografía de Afinidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/economía , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/microbiología , Diagnóstico Precoz , Humanos , Estudios Observacionales como Asunto , Neumonía Bacteriana/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía Bacteriana/economía , Neumonía Bacteriana/microbiología , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Análisis de Supervivencia , Procedimientos Innecesarios
15.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 34(8): 839-42, 2015 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25955834

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Most children diagnosed with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) are treated in the outpatient setting. The objective of this study was to determine the comparative clinical effectiveness of beta-lactam monotherapy and macrolide monotherapy in this population. STUDY DESIGN: Children, 1-18 years old, with a clinical diagnosis of CAP at an outpatient practice affiliated (n = 71) with Geisinger Health System during January 1, 2008 to January 31, 2010 were eligible. The primary exposure was receipt of beta-lactam or macrolide monotherapy. The primary outcome was treatment failure defined as change in antibiotic prescription within 14 days of the initial pneumonia diagnosis. Propensity scores were used to determine the likelihood of receiving macrolide monotherapy. Treatment groups were matched 1:1, based on propensity score, age group and asthma status. Multivariable conditional logistic regression models estimated the association between macrolide monotherapy and treatment failures. RESULTS: Of 1999 children with CAP, 1164 were matched. In the matched cohorts, 24% of children had asthma. Patients who received macrolide monotherapy had no statistical difference in treatment failure regardless of age when compared with patients who received beta-lactam monotherapy. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that children diagnosed with CAP in the outpatient setting and treated with beta-lactam or macrolide monotherapy have the same likelihood to fail treatment regardless of age.


Asunto(s)
Macrólidos/economía , Macrólidos/uso terapéutico , Pacientes Ambulatorios/estadística & datos numéricos , Neumonía Bacteriana/tratamiento farmacológico , beta-Lactamas/economía , beta-Lactamas/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Pennsylvania/epidemiología , Neumonía Bacteriana/economía , Neumonía Bacteriana/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos
16.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 11(5): 1081-7, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25874476

RESUMEN

Invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) and pneumonia are the major causes of morbidity and deaths in children in the world. The management of IPD and pneumonia is an important economic burden on healthcare systems and families. The aim of this study was to assess the economic burden of IPD and pneumonia among younger children in Taiwan. We used a cost-illness approach to identify the cost categories for analysis in this study according to various perspectives. We obtained data of admission, outpatient, and emergency department visit data from the National Health Insurance Research (NHIR) database for children <5 y of age between January 2008 and December 2008. A prospective survey was administered to the families of patients to obtain detailed personal costs. All costs are presented in US dollars and were estimated by extrapolating 2008 cost data to 2013 price levels. We estimated the number of pneumococcal disease cases that were averted if the PCV-13 vaccine had been available in 2008. The total annual social and hospital costs for IPD were US $4.3 million and US $926,000, respectively. The total annual social and hospital costs for pneumonia were US $150 million and US $17 million, respectively. On average, families spent US $653 or US $218 when their child was diagnosed with IPD or pneumonia, respectively. This cost is approximately 27%-81% of the monthly salary of an unskilled worker. In conclusion, a safe and effective pediatric pneumococcal vaccine is needed to reduce the economic burden caused by pneumococcal infection.


Asunto(s)
Programas de Inmunización , Infecciones Neumocócicas/economía , Infecciones Neumocócicas/epidemiología , Vacunas Neumococicas/administración & dosificación , Bacteriemia/economía , Bacteriemia/epidemiología , Preescolar , Costo de Enfermedad , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Meningitis Bacterianas/economía , Meningitis Bacterianas/epidemiología , Vacunas Neumococicas/inmunología , Neumonía Bacteriana/economía , Neumonía Bacteriana/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Taiwán/epidemiología
17.
Int J Infect Dis ; 40: 102-7, 2015 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25813554

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of empiric antibiotic regimens covering atypical pathogens with respect to detailed clinical and economic outcomes in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). METHODS: A population-based, multicenter, retrospective cohort study was conducted from June 2010 to May 2011. Patients with a diagnosis of CAP were enrolled and categorized into two groups according to the initial antibiotic strategy used - covering or not covering atypical pathogens. Regression analysis was performed to assess their clinical outcomes (all-cause mortality, clinical improvement rate after 72 h of antimicrobial therapy, and clinical cure rate) and economic outcomes (length of stay, hospitalization costs, and antibiotic expenditure). RESULTS: A total of 827 patients met the criteria for CAP; 561 (67.8%) received antibiotics with atypical pathogen coverage (APC group), while 266 (32.2%) did not (non-APC group). Regression analysis revealed that the all-cause mortality was much lower in the APC group than in the non-APC group (0.9% vs. 4.9%, respectively), with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.18 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.06-0.49). Clinical improvement at 72 h (87.7% vs. 85.0%, p=0.274) and the clinical cure rate (91.1% vs. 88.3%, p=0.213) were more favorable in the APC group, but with no significant difference compared to the non-APC group. Moreover, the APC group had a shorter mean length of stay (APC 10.2 days vs. non-APC 11.6 days, p<0.001). In addition, the mean total hospitalization costs for the APC group were markedly lower compared with the non-APC group (US$ 1172.7 vs. US$ 1510.7; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Antimicrobial treatment covering atypical pathogens for hospitalized CAP patients is associated with reduced mortality and economic burden.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía Bacteriana/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía Bacteriana/microbiología , Adulto , Anciano , Antibacterianos/economía , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neumonía Bacteriana/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos
18.
Epidemiol Infect ; 143(8): 1719-30, 2015 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25262779

RESUMEN

The objective of this study was to estimate the direct financial costs of hospital care for management of invasive group A streptococcal (GAS) infections using hospital records for cases diagnosed in England. We linked laboratory-confirmed cases (n = 3696) identified through national surveillance to hospital episode statistics and reimbursement codes. From these codes we estimated the direct hospital costs of admissions. Almost all notified invasive GAS cases (92% of 3696) were successfully matched to a primary hospital admission. Of these, secondary admissions (within 30 days of primary admission) were further identified for 593 (17%). After exclusion of nosocomial cases (12%), the median costs of primary and secondary hospital admissions were estimated by subgroup analysis as £1984-£2212 per case, totalling £4·43-£6·34 million per year in England. With adjustment for unmatched cases this equated to £4·84-£6·93 million per year. Adults aged 16-64 years accounted for 48% of costs but only 40% of cases, largely due to an increased number of surgical procedures. The direct costs of hospital admissions for invasive GAS infection are substantial. These estimated costs will contribute to a full assessment of the total economic burden of invasive GAS infection as a means to assess potential savings through prevention measures.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Críticos/economía , Fascitis Necrotizante/economía , Costos de Hospital , Hospitalización/economía , Neumonía Bacteriana/economía , Sepsis/economía , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/economía , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/economía , Streptococcus pyogenes , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Preescolar , Inglaterra/epidemiología , Fascitis Necrotizante/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neumonía Bacteriana/epidemiología , Sepsis/epidemiología , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/epidemiología , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
19.
J Med Econ ; 17(5): 312-9, 2014 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24575941

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) and pneumococcal pneumonia cause substantial morbidity and mortality worldwide. This retrospective study was conducted to estimate the disease burden from pneumococcal disease in older adults in Taiwan from a health insurer's perspective. METHODS: Data for the years 2002-2009 from patients aged ≥50 years with insurance records indicating pneumococcal meningitis, pneumococcal bacteremia, or hospitalized or outpatient pneumonia were obtained from the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan. Admission data for inpatients, visit data for outpatients, and associated costs were extracted from the database to estimate the incidence, case fatality rates, and direct and indirect costs of pneumococcal disease episodes. These data were applied to the estimated population of Taiwan in 2010 to provide an estimated disease burden for a single year from the payer perspective. RESULTS: The average incidence per 100,000 person years was 2.4 for IPD, 278.8 for hospitalized pneumococcal pneumonia, and 1376.4 for outpatient pneumococcal pneumonia. The average case fatality rate was 12.3% for IPD and 10.0% for hospitalized pneumonia. Hospitalized pneumonia accounted for over 90% of direct medical costs. The incidence of hospitalized pneumococcal pneumonia per 100,000 person years was 84.4 for adults of 50-64 years, 313.1 for adults of 65-74 years, 820.3 for adults of 75-84 years, and 1650.9 for adults of 85+ year of age. In 2010, it was estimated there were over 113,000 episodes of pneumococcal disease, causing almost 2000 deaths, with direct medical costs of more than NT$3.4 billion annually. CONCLUSIONS: Pneumococcal disease is a significant cause of mortality and excess healthcare expense among the elderly in Taiwan. Disease burden in older adults increases with advancing age.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Neumocócicas/economía , Infecciones Neumocócicas/epidemiología , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bacteriemia/economía , Bacteriemia/epidemiología , Costo de Enfermedad , Femenino , Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/economía , Humanos , Incidencia , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Meningitis Neumocócica/economía , Meningitis Neumocócica/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infecciones Neumocócicas/mortalidad , Neumonía Bacteriana/economía , Neumonía Bacteriana/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Taiwán/epidemiología
20.
Pharmacoeconomics ; 32(2): 159-72, 2014 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24338264

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cystic fibrosis (CF) affects over 9,000 people in the UK and limits life expectancy. CF patients are susceptible to lung infections, most commonly Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Once infection is established, patients require lifetime treatment using nebulised antibiotics. Newer dry powder formulations of antibiotics may reduce treatment burden and improve compliance. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate the cost effectiveness of (i) colistimethate sodium dry powder for inhalation (DPI) and (ii) tobramycin DPI versus nebulised tobramycin for the treatment of chronic P. aeruginosa lung infection in patients with CF from the perspective of the National Health Service (NHS) and Personal Social Services (PSS). METHODS: We developed a state transition model based on transitions between three strata of lung function measured in terms of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) % predicted. Additional health states representing post-lung transplantation and dead are also modelled. The model structure was informed by systematic reviews of evidence concerning the plausibility of potential relationships between intermediate endpoints and final outcomes. The model assumes that treatment impacts on FEV1 trajectory, which manifest as changes in health-related quality of life. No survival benefit is assumed due to the absence of robust quantifiable evidence. Model parameters were informed by patient-level and aggregate data from two randomised controlled trials together with the best available evidence from the literature. Resource use and costs associated with drug acquisition, the management of exacerbations and reduced nebuliser maintenance were drawn from reference sources and expert opinion. Costs were valued at 2011/2012 prices. Costs and health outcomes were discounted at a rate of 3.5 %. Simple and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were undertaken, including additional analyses of Patient Access Scheme (PAS) price discounts offered by the manufacturers of both DPI products. RESULTS: Colistimethate sodium DPI is expected to produce fewer quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) than nebulised tobramycin. Based on its list price, colistimethate sodium DPI is expected to be dominated by nebulised tobramycin. When the PAS is incorporated, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for colistimethate sodium DPI versus nebulised tobramycin is expected to be approximately £288,600 saved per QALY lost. Based on its current list price, the ICER for tobramycin DPI versus nebulised tobramycin is expected to be approximately £124,000 per QALY gained. When the proposed PAS is included, tobramycin DPI is expected to dominate nebulised tobramycin. CONCLUSIONS: Under their list prices, neither DPI product is likely to represent good value for money for the NHS given current cost-effectiveness thresholds. The PAS discounts have a significant impact upon the economic attractiveness of both DPI products compared against nebulised tobramycin. The clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness of the DPIs against other nebulised antibiotics, such as aztreonam and inhaled colistimethate sodium, remains unclear.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/economía , Fibrosis Quística/tratamiento farmacológico , Modelos Económicos , Neumonía Bacteriana/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/tratamiento farmacológico , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/aislamiento & purificación , Adulto , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Colistina/administración & dosificación , Colistina/análogos & derivados , Colistina/economía , Colistina/uso terapéutico , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Fibrosis Quística/complicaciones , Fibrosis Quística/economía , Fibrosis Quística/microbiología , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Inhaladores de Polvo Seco/economía , Humanos , Neumonía Bacteriana/complicaciones , Neumonía Bacteriana/economía , Neumonía Bacteriana/microbiología , Probabilidad , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/complicaciones , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/economía , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/microbiología , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Análisis de Supervivencia , Tobramicina/administración & dosificación , Tobramicina/economía , Tobramicina/uso terapéutico , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...