Asunto(s)
Neurocirujanos , Neurocirugia , Humanos , Neurocirujanos/psicología , Femenino , MasculinoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the influence of gender on patient preferences during the selection of neurosurgeons. METHODS: A mixed-method, cross-sectional study was conducted at Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital in Taiwan, involving 60 patients. The study encompassed both structured questionnaires and in-depth interviews, administered postpatient-surgeon interactions to assess the nuanced effect of surgeon gender on patient choice. A balanced representation of both genders was ensured among the neurosurgeons involved. Thematic analysis was employed for textual data, while numeric data were analyzed using descriptive and Chi-square statistics. RESULTS: The majority of participants (n = 40, 66.7%) expressed no preference regarding the gender of their neurosurgeon during outpatient consultations. Nonetheless, a notable fraction, predominantly female, preferred female neurosurgeons (n = 20, 33.3%). Statistical analysis highlighted a significant correlation between the gender of the patients and their preferred neurosurgeon's gender, with female patients predominantly favouring female neurosurgeons (P < 0.05). Qualitative insights indicate that, although professional skill and experience are primary factors in selecting a neurosurgeon, a latent gender preference exists, influenced by perceived privacy, empathetic care, and the surgical finesse associated with female neurosurgeons. CONCLUSIONS: Although expertise and professionalism are of paramount importance, there is a clear preference for female neurosurgeons, especially among female patients. These findings underscore the importance of recognizing and accommodating patients' preferences to ensure neurosurgical care aligns with patient comfort, expectations, and the broader movement towards gender equality.
Asunto(s)
Neurocirujanos , Prioridad del Paciente , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Taiwán , Neurocirujanos/psicología , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Transversales , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Anciano , Factores Sexuales , Relaciones Médico-PacienteRESUMEN
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The social and technological mutation of our contemporary period disrupts the traditional dyad that prevails in the relationship between physicians and patients. PURPOSE: The solicitation of a second opinion by the patient may potentially alter this dyad and degrade the mutual trust between the stakeholders concerned. The doctor-patient relationship has often been studied from the patient's perspective, but data are scarce from the spine surgeon's point of view. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: This qualitative study used the grounded theory approach, an inductive methodology emphasizing field data and rejecting predetermined assumptions. PATIENT SAMPLE: We interviewed spine surgeons of different ages, experiences, and practice locations. We initially contacted 30 practitioners, but the final number (24 interviews; 11 orthopedists and 13 neurosurgeons) was determined by data saturation (the point at which no new topics appeared). OUTCOME MEASURES: Themes and subthemes were analyzed using semistructured interviews until saturation was reached. METHODS: Data were collected through individual interviews, independently analyzed thematically using specialized software, and triangulated by three researchers (an anthropologist, psychiatrist, and neurosurgeon). RESULTS: Index surgeons were defined when their patients went for a second opinion and recourse surgeons were defined as surgeons who were asked for a second opinion. Data analysis identified five overarching themes based on recurring elements in the interviews: (1) analysis of the patient's motivations for seeking a second opinion; (2) impaired trust and disloyalty; (3) ego, authority, and surgeon image; (4) management of a consultation recourse (measurement and ethics); and (5) the second opinion as an avoidance strategy. Despite the inherent asymmetry in the doctor-patient relationship, surgeons and patients share two symmetrical continua according to their perspective (professional or consumerist), involving power and control on the one hand and loyalty and autonomy on the other. These shared elements can be found in index consultations (seeking high-level care/respecting trust/closing the loyalty gap/managing disengagement) and referral consultations (objective and independent advice/trusting of the index advice/avoiding negative and anxiety-provoking situations). CONCLUSIONS: The second opinion often has a negative connotation with spine surgeons, who see it as a breach of loyalty and trust, without neglecting ego injury in their relationship with the patient. A paradigm shift would allow the second opinion to be perceived as a valuable resource that broadens the physician-patient relationship and optimizes the shared surgical decision-making process.
Asunto(s)
Neurocirujanos , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Investigación Cualitativa , Derivación y Consulta , Humanos , Neurocirujanos/psicología , Femenino , Masculino , Confianza , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cirujanos/psicología , Columna Vertebral/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The path through neurosurgery is rigorous. Many neurosurgeons may experience burnout, depression, or suicide throughout training and practice. We review the literature to help foster a culture of awareness and self-care and arm trainees with coping skills to reduce burnout and, thus, suicidality during all phases of their medical careers. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines using 4 databases. 7 studies were included. RESULTS: Overlying themes of interventions were to increase balance, mindfulness, and physical fitness. The most common interventions included in programs were educational and physical activity. We suggest a comprehensive wellness program emphasizing interventions from 4 wellness dimensions-physical, spiritual, mental, and emotional. CONCLUSIONS: Many neurosurgeons experience burnout, leading to a lack of satisfaction and early retirement; this necessitates a discipline-wide acknowledgment of endemic burnout among neurosurgeons. Systemic changes are needed to refine the training process and prioritize physician well-being- this cannot be left to chance.
Asunto(s)
Agotamiento Profesional , Neurocirujanos , Humanos , Agotamiento Profesional/prevención & control , Agotamiento Profesional/psicología , Neurocirujanos/psicología , Neurocirugia/educaciónRESUMEN
In a changing learning environment where young neurointerventionalists spend less time in the operating room, computer simulators have been established as a new training model. Our aim was the comparison of silicone models and computer simulators, and the evaluation of their influence on subjective self-confidence of operators. Pre- and postquestionnaires of 27 participants and 9 tutors were evaluated after the participation in a three-days interventional stroke course using silicone models and computer simulators. Training on computer simulators was considered as more realistic and important before patient contact than training on silicone models. Participants rated their own abilities as significantly better after participation in the course and felt significantly better prepared for patient care. Training on computer simulators can increase the subjective self-confidence of trainees. We suggest a stepwise training program, comprising both ex-vivo and the porcine in-vivo model, finished by conventional operating room teaching, to prepare neuroradiologists for optimal patient care when performing interventions.
Asunto(s)
Educación Médica Continua/métodos , Maniquíes , Neurocirujanos/educación , Autoimagen , Simulación por Computador , Curriculum , Humanos , Neurocirujanos/psicología , Neurocirugia/educación , Materiales de EnseñanzaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Due to the lack of consensus on the management of glioblastoma patients, there exists variability amongst surgeons and centers regarding treatment decisions. Though, objective data about the extent of this heterogeneity is still lacking. We aim to evaluate and analyze the similarities and differences in neurosurgical practice patterns. METHODS: The survey was distributed to members of the neurosurgical societies of the Netherlands (NVVN), Europe (EANS), the United Kingdom (SBNS) and the United States (CNS) between January and March 2021 with questions about the selection of surgical modality and decision making in glioblastoma patients. RESULTS: Survey respondents (224 neurosurgeons) were from 41 countries. Overall, the most notable differences observed were the presence and timing of a multidisciplinary tumor board; the importance and role of various perioperative factors in the decision-making process, and the preferred treatment in various glioblastoma cases and case variants. Tumor boards were more common at academic centers. The intended extent of resection for glioblastoma resections in eloquent areas was limited more often in European neurosurgeons. We found a strong relationship between the surgeon's theoretical survey answers and their actual approach in presented patient cases. In general, the factors which were found to be theoretically the most important in surgical decision making were confirmed to influence the respondents' decisions to the greatest extent in practice as well. DISCUSSION: This survey illustrates the theoretical and practical heterogeneity among surgeons and centers in their decision making and treatment selection for glioblastoma patients. These data invite further evaluations to identify key variables that can be optimized and may therefore benefit from consensus.
Asunto(s)
Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Glioblastoma , Neurocirujanos , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos , Glioblastoma/cirugía , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Internacionalidad , Neurocirujanos/psicología , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Concerns about the changing demographics in the United States and the aging of the neurosurgical workforce exist. Both the importance and inherent risk of surgical responsibilities suggest that thought be given to whether workloads should change later in surgeons' careers. We sought to assess current neurosurgeons' expectations concerning their late-stage careers. METHODS: A survey was sent to 3317 U.S. board-certified neurosurgeons. It was designed to assess surgeons' perceptions of call and operative responsibilities in the later stages of their careers. Statistical analyses were completed in R version 3.6.1, with an alpha set to 0.05. RESULTS: Six-hundred and fifty-nine neurosurgeons completed the questionnaire. Seventy-seven percent believed that the call burden should decrease later in practice, and 66% planned to decrease their own call burden later in their career. The most common age range for planned retirement was 65 to 69 years (36%), followed by 70+ years (33%). Most (67%) believed that there should not be a mandatory age to stop operating. More recent year of residency completion was negatively associated with the belief that call burden should decrease at older age groups and positively associated with support for a mandatory age to stop operating as well as an earlier retirement age. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that neurosurgeons have differing views on how workloads should change later in their careers. Younger neurosurgeons support an earlier decrease in workload or even a policy-mandated stop to operating after a certain age. These results may give insight into future trends and turnover in neurosurgery and provide a valuable tool to help practices anticipate workforce changes.
Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Relaciones Intergeneracionales , Neurocirujanos/psicología , Percepción , Jubilación/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Competencia Clínica , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neurocirujanos/tendencias , Jubilación/tendencias , Carga de Trabajo/psicologíaAsunto(s)
Competencia Clínica , Neurocirujanos/psicología , Neurocirugia/educación , Selección de Personal , Pruebas Psicológicas , Estrés Psicológico/psicología , Medicina Aeroespacial , Astronautas/psicología , Humanos , Internado y Residencia/economía , Neurocirugia/psicología , Estados Unidos , United States National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Neurosurgical trainees have a heavy workload and poor quality of life, resulting in high rates of burnout and attrition. Consequently, wellness programs have been used by various training institutions to combat this situation. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to identify and describe wellness programs available for neurosurgical trainees in their training institutions, the outcome measures used to assess them, and their efficacy. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was made following PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS: Six studies were included in the review, describing wellness programs from 9 institutions. All programs except 1 used exercise as the core component. The other components included physical and mental well-being lectures, team-building activities, and cultural excursions. Most institutions used piloted satisfaction and perception questionnaires to assess efficacy. Trainee perceptions of wellness programs were generally positive, but the responses on validated questionnaires and surveys were mixed. Barriers to the program included lack of institutional support, time constraints, fatigue, and feelings of guilt in prioritizing wellness over patient care. CONCLUSIONS: There is a paucity of literature regarding trainee wellness in neurosurgery. A few training programs have instituted wellness initiatives for trainees, and the feedback was generally positive. However, objective measures of efficacy such as validated questionnaires and scales yielded mixed results.
Asunto(s)
Agotamiento Profesional/prevención & control , Promoción de la Salud/métodos , Neurocirujanos/psicología , Neurocirugia/psicología , Agotamiento Profesional/psicología , Humanos , Internado y ResidenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The demand of thrombectomy treatment for acute ischemic stroke increased dramatically in the United States after the publication of 5 pivotal trials in 2015. The impact of call burden on career satisfaction and burnout in neurointerventionalists has not been explored. METHODS: A qualitative approach was chosen to obtain rich, detailed accounts of physician experiences. From July 2018 to July 2019, we conducted in-depth, semistructured interviews (mean duration, 43 minutes) with 16 academic neurointerventionalists from various institutions in the United States. Participants were chosen from the Society of Neurointerventional Surgery to include multiple specialties, career stages, and geographic locations. Key themes/subthemes were organized into a conceptual model and shown by exemplary quotes. RESULTS: Participants report a diverse range of previously uncharacterized ways in which stroke call responsibilities affect their lives. Unrealistic performance expectations, discipline-based inequalities, poor organizational workflow, limited opportunities for growth and advancement, and lack of control over call conditions are some of the key themes identified. Participants describe a need for interventions that address both the issues of workload stress (i.e., resources for stroke call and administrative work) and their ability to accomplish professional goals (i.e., flexible work arrangements, leadership autonomy support, and organizational value congruence). CONCLUSIONS: The burden of stroke call has strong implications for career satisfaction and burnout in neurointerventionalists. This model can be used by hospitals, departments, and physician groups to better conceptualize conditions that facilitate burnout and attrition. Changes to hospital management practices and culture may be the most productive focal areas for intervention.
Asunto(s)
Agotamiento Profesional , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/cirugía , Satisfacción en el Trabajo , Neurocirujanos/psicología , Estudios de Evaluación como Asunto , Humanos , Trombectomía , Estados Unidos , Carga de TrabajoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) and stroke have devastating consequences and are major global public health issues. For patients that require a cerebral decompression after suffering a TBI or stroke, a decompressive craniectomy (DC) is the most commonly performed operation. However, retrospective non-randomized studies suggest that a decompressive craniotomy (DCO; also known as hinge or floating craniotomy), where a bone flap is replaced but not rigidly fixed, has comparable outcomes to DC. The primary aim of this project was to understand the current extent of usage of DC and DCO for TBI and stroke worldwide. METHOD: A questionnaire was designed and disseminated globally via emailing lists and social media to practicing neurosurgeons between June and November 2019. RESULTS: We received 208 responses from 60 countries [40 low- and middle-income countries (LMICs)]. DC is used more frequently than DCO, however, about one-quarter of respondents are using a DCO in more than 25% of their patients. The three top indications for a DCO were an acute subdural hematoma (ASDH) and a GCS of 9-12, ASDH with contusions and a GCS of 3-8, and ASDH with contusions and a GCS of 9-12. There were 8 DCO techniques used with the majority (60/125) loosely tying sutures to the bone flap. The majority (82%) stated that they were interested in collaborating on a randomized trial of DCO vs. DC. CONCLUSION: Our results show that DCO is a procedure carried out for TBI and stroke, especially in LMICs, and most commonly for an ASDH. The majority of the respondents were interested in collaborating on a is a future randomized trial.
Asunto(s)
Craniectomía Descompresiva/métodos , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Adulto , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/cirugía , Craniectomía Descompresiva/normas , Hematoma Subdural Agudo/cirugía , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neurocirujanos/psicología , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Accidente Cerebrovascular/cirugía , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The busy and demanding work schedule of neurosurgeons suggests that they might have type A behavior patterns (TABPs). TABPs are also associated with multiple diseases; hence, their early identification could lead to behavioral changes and disease prevention. We aimed to determine the presence of TABPs among neurosurgeons and trainees in the Philippines and the association between demographic and clinical factors and TABPs. METHODS: An online survey was sent to neurosurgeons and neurosurgical trainees in the Philippines. Data on age, sex, comorbid conditions, smoking, alcohol use, training institution, level of residency training, and place of practice were obtained. The modified Bortner scale was used to determine TABPs. Univariate and multiple regression analyses were used for analysis. RESULTS: A total of 102 individuals (41 neurosurgeons and 61 trainees) completed the survey. Most of the respondents were men (74%), with a mean age of 36 years. The Bortner scores were normally distributed. TABPs were significantly associated with female sex (P = 0.0006) in the entire cohort. However, the trainee cohort also exhibited a significant association between TABPs and training in a public institution (P = 0.0027). CONCLUSION: The presence of TABPs followed a normal distribution among neurosurgeons and neurosurgical trainees in the Philippines. A significant association was found between TABPs and female sex for both neurosurgeons and trainees, and training in a public institution was significantly associated with TABPs only among the trainees.
Asunto(s)
Neurocirujanos/psicología , Personalidad Tipo A , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Internado y Residencia , Masculino , Filipinas , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) affect a significant percentage of the neurosurgical workforce. The aim of the current questionnaire-based study was to examine the prevalence of WMSDs amongst neurosurgeons, identify risk factors, and study the views of neurosurgeons regarding ergonomics. METHODS: From June to August 2020, members of the "European Association of Neurosurgical Societies," the "Neurosurgery Research Listserv," and the "Latin American Federation of Neurosurgical Societies" were asked to complete an electronic questionnaire on the topics of WMSDs and ergonomics. RESULTS: A total of 409 neurosurgeons responded to the survey, with a 4.7 male to female ratio. Most of the surgeons worked in Europe (76.9%) in academic public hospitals. The vast majority of the participants (87.9%) had experienced WMSDs, mainly affecting the shoulder, neck, and back muscles. The most common operations performed by the participants were "Craniotomy for convexity/intrinsic tumors" (24.1%) and "Open lumbar basic spine" (24.1%). Neurosurgeons agreed that ergonomics is an underexposed area in the neurosurgical field (84.8%) and that more resources should be spend (87.3%) and training curricula changes should be made (78.3%) in order to alleviate the burden of WMSDs on neurosurgeons. Univariate analysis did not reveal any associations between the development of WMSDs and age, gender, tenure, average duration of operation, operating time per week, type of operation, and surgical approach. CONCLUSIONS: The problem of WMSDs ought to be more closely addressed and managed by the neurosurgical community. More studies ought to be designed to investigate specific ergonomic parameters in order to formulate practice recommendations.
Asunto(s)
Ergonomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/epidemiología , Neurocirujanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto , Ergonomía/normas , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/cirugía , Neurocirujanos/psicología , Enfermedades Profesionales/cirugía , Factores de Riesgo , Hombro/cirugíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Social media has been used increasingly in neurosurgery by individuals. We aimed to identify demographics and preferences of social media use, describe the scope of social media use, and characterize its utility. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases. Titles and abstracts from articles identified in the search were read and selected for full-text review. Studies meeting prespecified inclusion criteria were reviewed in full and analyzed for relevant data. RESULTS: Of 431 resultant articles, 29 were included. Patients and caregivers most commonly used Facebook and Twitter, whereas nearly 50% of neurosurgeons used LinkedIn and Doximity. Patient and caregiver users of social media tended to be <35 years old. Content of posts varied from requesting/providing information (â¼40%) to seeking emotional support/forming connections (â¼30%). A total of 20.6% of videos were irrelevant to clinical neurosurgery. Factual accuracy of most videos was poor to inadequate. Social media use was associated with greater academic impact for neurosurgical departments and journals. Posts with photos and videos and weekend posts generated 1.2-2 times greater engagement. CONCLUSIONS: Patients and caregivers who use social media are typically younger than 35 years old and commonly use Facebook or Twitter. Neurosurgeons prefer Doximity and LinkedIn. Social media yields information regarding common symptoms and uncovers novel symptoms. Videos are poor-to-inadequate quality and often irrelevant to clinical neurosurgery. Optimizing social media use will augment the exchange of ideas regarding clinical practice and research and empower patients and caregivers.
Asunto(s)
Cuidadores/psicología , Neurocirujanos/psicología , Neurocirugia/psicología , Medios de Comunicación Sociales , Cuidadores/tendencias , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Neurocirujanos/tendencias , Neurocirugia/tendencias , Medios de Comunicación Sociales/tendenciasRESUMEN
Neurosurgery is male dominated with women representing only 12% of residents and 5% of practicing neurosurgeons. The conflicting demands of training versus pregnancy and motherhood are significant deterrents to women entering the field. We examined pregnancy incidence and timing, perinatal complications, and the perceived career impact of motherhood on female neurosurgeons using an anonymous survey of 643 training, practicing, and retired female neurosurgeons from the United States. Among 260 respondents, 50.8% (132/260) reported pregnancies, with an average age at first pregnancy that was significantly higher than the national average (32.1 vs 26.3 yr). In all, 40.1% (53/132) of respondents reported perinatal complications in at least one of their pregnancies. Only 25% (33/132) of respondents noted designated program maternity allowances. The most significant challenges associated with being a mother and neurosurgeon reported were issues relating to work/life balance, "mommy guilt," and sleep deprivation. A majority of respondents, 70.1% (82/116), reported fear of backlash from co-residents, partners, and staff, as well as hindered career advancement related to childbearing. Female neurosurgeons face challenges surrounding family planning different from those faced by male practitioners. Higher perinatal and fetal complications, backlash from colleagues, and demanding workload are significant issues. Progress requires institutional support and mentorship for women to create a more diverse field of practitioners.
Asunto(s)
Neurocirujanos/psicología , Atención Perinatal , Resultado del Embarazo/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Carga de Trabajo/psicología , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Infertilidad Femenina/diagnóstico , Infertilidad Femenina/psicología , Internado y Residencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neurocirujanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Neurocirugia/educación , Neurocirugia/psicología , Neurocirugia/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Perinatal/estadística & datos numéricos , Embarazo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Carga de Trabajo/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is a potentially severe respiratory illness that has threatened humanity globally. The pediatric neurosurgery practice differs from that of adults in that it treats children in various stages of physical and psychological development and contemplates diseases that do not exist in other areas. The aim of this study was to identify the level of knowledge and readiness of the healthcare providers, as well as to evaluate new preventive practices that have been introduced, psychological concerns, and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on pediatric neurosurgical units in Brazil. METHODS: Pediatric neurosurgeons were given an online questionnaire developed by the Brazilian Society of Pediatric Neurosurgery to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on their clinical practice. RESULTS: Of a cohort of 110 active members of the Brazilian Society of Pediatric Neurosurgery, 76 completed the survey (69%). Ninety-six percent were aware of the correct use of and indication for the types of personal protective equipment in clinical and surgical practices, but only 73.7% of them had unrestricted access to this equipment. Ninety-eight percent of participants agreed or strongly agreed that the pandemic had affected their pediatric neurosurgical practice. The COVID-19 pandemic interfered with outpatient care in 88% of the centers, it affected neurosurgical activity in 90.7%, and it led to the cancellation of elective neurosurgical procedures in 57.3%. Concerning the impact of COVID-19 on surgical activity, 9.2% of the centers had less than 25% of the clinical practice affected, 46.1% had 26%-50% of their activity reduced, 35.5% had a 51%-75% reduction, and 9.2% had more than 75% of their surgical work cancelled or postponed. Sixty-three percent affirmed that patients had been tested for COVID-19 before surgery. Regarding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of those interviewed, 3.9% reported fear and anxiety with panic episodes, 7.9% had worsening of previous anxiety symptoms, 60.5% reported occasional fear, 10.5% had sadness and some depressive symptoms, and 2.6% reported depressive symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic has posed unprecedented challenges to healthcare services worldwide, including neurosurgical units. Medical workers, pediatric neurosurgeons included, should be aware of safety measures and follow the recommendations of local healthcare organizations, preventing and controlling the disease. Attention should be given to the psychological burden of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 in healthcare workers, which carries a high risk of anxiety and depression.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Personal de Salud/normas , Neurocirugia/normas , Pediatría/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , Sociedades Médicas/normas , Brasil/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Niño , Personal de Salud/psicología , Humanos , Neurocirujanos/psicología , Neurocirujanos/normas , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/normas , Pandemias/prevención & control , Equipo de Protección Personal/normas , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
AIM: To reveal the impacts of the novel coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on the functioning of neurosurgery clinics and to determine the anxiety levels and attitudes of Turkish neurosurgeons towards their profession during the pandemic. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The Beck anxiety inventory and a clinical activities scale were utilized as data collection tools and distributed to neurosurgeons in Turkey as an online survey. Descriptive statistical methods, significance tests and correlation and regression analyses were employed to analyze the data. The data analysis was carried out in a 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: Of the 240 neurosurgeons who participated in the study, 63.8% had encountered cases of COVID-19 and 53.8% had handled patients diagnosed with COVID-19. The study results showed that the pandemic did not cause anxiety in 62.9% of the respondents, but it caused mild anxiety in 13.8% and moderate anxiety in 12.12%. The findings also revealed a low linear correlation between the anxiety values and occupational anxiety of the neurosurgeons and low inverse correlation between anxiety values and the protection factor in the pandemic period. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused serious disruptions in the routine functioning of neurosurgery clinics and changes in the attitudes of neurosurgeons. Healthcare organizations should take the necessary precautions and measures to resolve the anxiety problems of healthcare professionals, such as providing professional support, and ensure that they can work in a safer environment.