RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to analyze the relationship between the participation of professionals in simulation-based training and an increase in the rate of vaginal deliveries. METHODS: This retrospective observational study analyzed professionals' participation in high-fidelity simulation training during the pilot phase of the Appropriate Delivery Project, spanning from May 21, 2015 to May 21, 2016, along with the rates of vaginal deliveries across various hospitals. Data for participation by nurses and physicians were examined using a gamma distribution model to discern the predictors influencing the changes in the percentage of vaginal births. RESULTS: Data from 27 hospitals involved in the project were analyzed. A total of 339 healthcare professionals, including 147 nurses and 192 doctors, underwent the simulation-based training. During the pilot test, the percentage of vaginal births increased from 27.8% to 36.1%, which further increased to 39.8% in the post-intervention period, particularly when the participation rate of nurses exceeded the median. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that simulation-based training is a valuable strategy for achieving positive changes in obstetric practice, specifically an increase in the rate of vaginal births. These findings underscore the potential advantages of incorporating simulation training into improvement initiatives, as evidenced by the correlation between higher training adoption rates and substantial and sustained enhancements in vaginal birth rates.
Asunto(s)
Parto Obstétrico , Entrenamiento Simulado , Humanos , Femenino , Brasil , Entrenamiento Simulado/métodos , Entrenamiento Simulado/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Embarazo , Parto Obstétrico/educación , Parto Obstétrico/estadística & datos numéricos , Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Competencia Clínica/estadística & datos numéricos , Proyectos Piloto , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Obstetricia/educación , Obstetricia/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) has caused continuous effects on the global public, especially for susceptible and vulnerable populations like pregnant women. COVID-19-related studies and publications have shown blowout development, making it challenging to identify development trends and hot areas by using traditional review methods for such massive data. Aimed to perform a bibliometric analysis to explore the status and hotspots of COVID-19 in obstetrics. An online search was conducted in the Web of Science Core Collection (WOSCC) database from January 01, 2020 to November 31, 2022, using the following search expression: (((TS= ("COVID 19" OR "coronavirus 2019" OR "coronavirus disease 2019" OR "SARS-CoV-2" OR "2019-nCoV" OR "2019 novel coronavirus" OR "SARS coronavirus 2" OR "Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2" OR "SARS-COV2")) AND TS= ("obstetric*" OR "pregnancy*" OR "pregnant" OR "parturition*" OR "puerperium"))). VOSviewer version 1.6.18, CiteSpace version 6.1.R6, R version 4.2.0, and Rstudio were used for the bibliometric and visualization analyses. 4144 articles were included in further analysis, including authors, titles, number of citations, countries, and author affiliations. The United States has contributed the most significant publications with the leading position. "Sahin, Dilek" has the largest output, and "Khalil, Asma" was the most influential author with the highest citations. Keywords of "Cov," "Experience," and "Neonate" with the highest frequency, and "Systematic Review" might be the new research hotspots and frontiers. The top 3 concerned genes included ACE2, CRP, and IL6. The new research hotspot is gradually shifting from the COVID-19 mechanism and its related clinical research to reviewing treatment options for pregnant women. This research uniquely delves into specific genes related to COVID-19's effects on obstetrics, a focus that has not been previously explored in other reviews. Our research enables clinicians and researchers to summarize the overall point of view of the existing literature and obtain more accurate conclusions.
Asunto(s)
Bibliometría , COVID-19 , Obstetricia , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/epidemiología , Humanos , Obstetricia/tendencias , Obstetricia/estadística & datos numéricos , Embarazo , Femenino , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/epidemiología , Salud Global , PandemiasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend multidisciplinary cardiovascular obstetric programs (CVOB) to manage complex pregnant patients with cardiovascular disease. Minimal evaluation of these programs exists, with most of these programs offered at university-based centers. METHODS: A cohort of 113 patients managed by a CVOB team at a non-university health system (2018-2019) were compared to 338 patients seen by cardiology prior to the program (2016-2017). CVOB patients were matched with comparison patients (controls) on modified World Health Organization (mWHO) category classification, yielding a cohort of 102 CVOB and 102 controls. RESULTS: CVOB patients were more ethnically diverse and cardiovascular risk was higher compared to controls based on mWHO ≥ II-III (57% vs 17%) and. After matching, CVOB patients had more cardiology tests during pregnancy (median of 8 tests vs 5, p < .001) and were more likely to receive telemetry care (32% vs 19%, p = .025). The median number of perinatology visits was significantly higher in the CVOB group (8 vs 2, p < .001). Length of stay was a half day longer for vaginal delivery patients in the CVOB group (median 2.66 vs 2.13, p = .006). CONCLUSION: Implementation of a CVOB program resulted in a more diverse patient population than previously referred to cardiology. The CVOB program participants also experienced a higher level of care in terms of increased cardiovascular testing, monitoring, care from specialists, and appropriate use of medications during pregnancy.
Asunto(s)
Complicaciones Cardiovasculares del Embarazo , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Adulto , Complicaciones Cardiovasculares del Embarazo/terapia , Complicaciones Cardiovasculares del Embarazo/epidemiología , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Obstetricia/estadística & datos numéricos , Obstetricia/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/terapia , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Cardiología , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administraciónRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to examine how variation in physicians' treatment decisions for newborn deliveries responds to changes in the hospital-level norms for obstetric clinical decision-making. DATA SOURCES: All hospital-based births in Florida from 2003 through 2017. STUDY DESIGN: Difference-in-differences approach is adopted that leverages obstetric unit closures as the source of identifying variation to exogenously shift obstetricians to a new, nearby hospital with different propensities to approach newborn deliveries less intensively. DATA EXTRACTION: Births attributed to physicians continuously observed 2 years before the closure event and 2 years after the closure event (treatment group physicians) or for identical time periods around a randomly assigned placebo closure date (control group physicians). PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: All of the physicians meeting our inclusion criteria shifted their births to a new hospital less than 20 miles from the hospital shuttering its obstetric unit. The new hospitals approached newborn births more conservatively, and treatment group physicians sharply became less aggressive in their newborn birth clinical management (e.g., use of C-section). The immediate 11-percentage point (33%) increase in delivering newborns without any procedure behavior change is statistically significant (p value <0.01) and persistent after the closure event; however, the physicians' payer and patient mix are unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Obstetric physician behavior change appears highly malleable and sensitive to the practice patterns of other physicians delivering newborns at the same hospital. Incentives and policies that encourage more appropriate clinical care norms hospital-wide could sharply improve physician treatment decisions, with benefits for maternal and infant outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Humanos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Florida , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Parto Obstétrico/estadística & datos numéricos , Obstetricia/estadística & datos numéricos , AdultoRESUMEN
Importance: Unlike other surgical specialties, obstetrics and gynecology (OB-GYN) has been predominantly female for the last decade. The association of this with gender bias and sexual harassment is not known. Objective: To systematically review the prevalence of sexual harassment, bullying, abuse, and discrimination among OB-GYN clinicians and trainees and interventions aimed at reducing harassment in OB-GYN and other surgical specialties. Evidence Review: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted to identify studies published from inception through June 13, 2023.: For the prevalence of harassment, OB-GYN clinicians and trainees on OB-GYN rotations in all subspecialties in the US or Canada were included. Personal experiences of harassment (sexual harassment, bullying, abuse, and discrimination) by other health care personnel, event reporting, burnout and exit from medicine, fear of retaliation, and related outcomes were included. Interventions across all surgical specialties in any country to decrease incidence of harassment were also evaluated. Abstracts and potentially relevant full-text articles were double screened.: Eligible studies were extracted into standard forms. Risk of bias and certainty of evidence of included research were assessed. A meta-analysis was not performed owing to heterogeneity of outcomes. Findings: A total of 10 eligible studies among 5852 participants addressed prevalence and 12 eligible studies among 2906 participants addressed interventions. The prevalence of sexual harassment (range, 250 of 907 physicians [27.6%] to 181 of 255 female gynecologic oncologists [70.9%]), workplace discrimination (range, 142 of 249 gynecologic oncologists [57.0%] to 354 of 527 gynecologic oncologists [67.2%] among women; 138 of 358 gynecologic oncologists among males [38.5%]), and bullying (131 of 248 female gynecologic oncologists [52.8%]) was frequent among OB-GYN respondents. OB-GYN trainees commonly experienced sexual harassment (253 of 366 respondents [69.1%]), which included gender harassment, unwanted sexual attention, and sexual coercion. The proportion of OB-GYN clinicians who reported their sexual harassment to anyone ranged from 21 of 250 AAGL (formerly, the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists) members (8.4%) to 32 of 256 gynecologic oncologists (12.5%) compared with 32.6% of OB-GYN trainees. Mistreatment during their OB-GYN rotation was indicated by 168 of 668 medical students surveyed (25.1%). Perpetrators of harassment included physicians (30.1%), other trainees (13.1%), and operating room staff (7.7%). Various interventions were used and studied, which were associated with improved recognition of bias and reporting (eg, implementation of a video- and discussion-based mistreatment program during a surgery clerkship was associated with a decrease in medical student mistreatment reports from 14 reports in previous year to 9 reports in the first year and 4 in the second year after implementation). However, no significant decrease in the frequency of sexual harassment was found with any intervention. Conclusions and Relevance: This study found high rates of harassment behaviors within OB-GYN. Interventions to limit these behaviors were not adequately studied, were limited mostly to medical students, and typically did not specifically address sexual or other forms of harassment.
Asunto(s)
Ginecología , Obstetricia , Acoso Sexual , Humanos , Acoso Sexual/estadística & datos numéricos , Acoso Sexual/psicología , Ginecología/educación , Femenino , Obstetricia/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Sexismo/estadística & datos numéricos , Sexismo/psicología , Acoso Escolar/estadística & datos numéricos , Acoso Escolar/psicología , Prevalencia , Canadá , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Lack of access to risk-appropriate maternity services, particularly for rural residents, is thought to be a leading contributor to disparities in maternal morbidity and mortality. There are several existing measures of access to obstetric care in the literature and popular media. In this study, we explored how current measures of obstetric access inform the number and location of additional obstetric care facilities required to improve access. METHODS: We formulated two facility location optimization models to determine the number of new facilities required to minimize the number of reproductive-aged women who lack access to obstetric care. We define regions with a lack of access as either maternity care deserts, designated by the March of Dimes to be counties with no obstetric care facility or obstetric providers, or regions further than 50 miles from critical care obstetric (CCO) services. We gathered information on hospitals with obstetric services from Georgia Department of Public Health public reports and estimated the female reproductive-age population by census block group using the American Community Survey. RESULTS: Out of the 1,910,308 reproductive-aged women who live in Georgia, 104,158 (5.5%) live in maternity care deserts, 150,563 (7.9%) reproductive-aged women live further than 50 miles from CCO services, and 38,202 (2.0%) live in both maternity care desert and further than 50 miles from CCO services. Our optimization analysis suggests that at least 56 new obstetric care facilities (a 67% increase) would be required to eliminate maternity care deserts in Georgia. However, the expansion of 8 facilities would ensure all women in Georgia live within 50 miles of CCO services. CONCLUSIONS: Current measures of access to obstetric care may not be sufficient for evaluating access and planning action toward improvements. In a state like Georgia with a large number of small counties, eliminating maternity care deserts would require a prohibitively large number of new obstetric care facilities. This work suggests that additional measures and tools are needed to estimate the number and type of obstetric care facilities that best match practical resources to meet obstetric care needs.
Asunto(s)
Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Servicios de Salud Materna , Humanos , Femenino , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Salud Materna/estadística & datos numéricos , Embarazo , Georgia , Adulto , Obstetricia/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
Importance: Emergency department (ED) use postpartum is a common and often-preventable event. Unlike traditional obstetrics models, the Ontario midwifery model offers early care postpartum. Objective: To assess whether postpartum ED use differs between women who received perinatal care in midwifery-model care vs in traditional obstetrics-model care. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective population-based cohort study took place in Ontario, Canada, where public health care is universally funded. Participants included women who were low risk and primiparous and gave birth to a live baby in an Ontario hospital between 2012 and 2018. Data were collected from April 2012 to March 2018 and analyzed from June 2022 to April 2023. Exposures: Perinatal care clinician, namely, a midwife or obstetrician. Main Outcome and Measures: : Any unscheduled ED visit 42 days postpartum or less. Poisson regression models compared ED use between women with midwifery-model care vs obstetrics-model care, weighting by propensity score-based overlap weights. Results: Among 104 995 primiparous women aged 11 to 50 years, those in midwifery-model care received a median (IQR) of 7 (6-8) postpartum visits, compared with 0 (0-1) visits among those receiving obstetrics-model care. Unscheduled ED visits 42 days or less postpartum occurred for 1549 of 23â¯124 women (6.7%) with midwifery-model care compared with 6902 of 81â¯871 women (8.4%) with traditional obstetrics-model care (adjusted relative risks [aRR], 0.78; 95% CI, 0.73-0.83). Similar aRRs were seen in women with a spontaneous vaginal birth (aRR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.65-0.78) or assisted vaginal birth (aRR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.59-0.82) but not those with a cesarean birth (aRR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.86-1.03) or those with intrapartum transfer of care between a midwife and obstetrician (aRR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.87-1.04). ED use 7 days or less postpartum was also lower among women receiving midwifery model care (aRR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.65-0.77). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, midwifery-model care was associated with less postpartum ED use than traditional obstetrics-model care among women who had low risk and were primiparous, which may be due to early access to postpartum care provided by Ontario midwives.
Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Partería , Obstetricia , Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Ontario , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Embarazo , Partería/estadística & datos numéricos , Obstetricia/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven , Periodo Posparto , Adolescente , Persona de Mediana Edad , NiñoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine has been proven effective in preventing HPV-related cancer. However, vaccination uptake in the United States remains unacceptably low. The aim of this study is to determine whether residents' HPV vaccination status, demographics, or residency training setting are predictive of vaccination prescribing practices. METHODS: This was an anonymous, IRB-approved, opt-in survey of OBGYN, Family Medicine, and Pediatric residents. Using the National Residency Match Program Web site, surveys were sent to program directors requesting their residents' participation. Demographics, practice settings, HPV vaccination status, reasons for being inappropriately vaccinated, and resident vaccination-prescribing practices were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 853 residents participated. A total of 56.7% of respondents were fully vaccinated against HPV. The most common reasons for being unvaccinated were as follows: age (51.7%, n = 122), monogamous (30.9%, n = 73), do not believe it works (22.5%, n = 53), and affordability/insurance did not cover (14.4%, n = 34). Residents working in an urban setting were more likely to be vaccinated than those in suburban (odds ratio [OR] = 1.93, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.364-3.229, p < .001) or rural (OR = 2.08, 95% CI 1.461-3.359, p 0.01) settings. Males were less likely than females (OR = 0.90, 95% CI 0.702-0.997, p < .001) to be vaccinated. Single residents were more likely to be vaccinated than married (OR = 2.56, 95% CI 2.444-2.704, p < .001) or divorced (OR = 2.15, 95% CI 1.822-3.264, p 0.21) residents. Vaccinated residents were more likely to recommend HPV vaccination to their patients than those who were unvaccinated (OR = 1.83, 95% CI 1.321-2.548, p .004). CONCLUSIONS: A significant portion of Family Medicine, Pediatrics, and OBGYN residents have not received appropriate vaccination against HPV. Vaccination is highest among residents who identify as female, single, or working in urban settings. Vaccinated residents were also found to be almost 2 times as likely to recommend vaccination to their patients. As such, our data suggest that targeted provider education is needed to increase vaccination rates for both trainees and their patients.
Asunto(s)
Internado y Residencia , Infecciones por Papillomavirus , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus , Vacunación , Humanos , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/prevención & control , Estados Unidos , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Internado y Residencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Obstetricia/estadística & datos numéricos , Ginecología/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
China has become an emerging destination for international migration, especially in some Association of South East Asian Nations countries, but the situation of migrants seeking medical care in China remains unclear. A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted in a hospital in Chongzuo, which provides medical services for foreigners, to investigate the situation of Vietnamese people seeking health care in Guangxi, China. Vietnamese patients who visited the hospital between 2018 and 2020 were included in the study. Demographic characteristics, clinical characteristics, characteristics of payment for medical costs, and characteristics of hospitalization were compared between outpatients and inpatients. In total, 778 Vietnamese outpatients and 173 inpatients were included in this study. The percentages of female outpatients and inpatients were 93.44% and 88.44% (χ2 = 5.133, Pâ =â .023), respectively. Approximately 30% of outpatients and 47% of inpatients visited the hospital due to obstetric needs. The proportions of outpatients with basic medical insurance for urban residents, basic medical insurance for urban employees, and new cooperative medical schemes were 28.02%, 3.21%, and 2.31%, respectively. In comparison, the proportion of inpatients with the above 3 types of medical insurance was 16.76%, 1.73%, and 2.31%, respectively. The proportion of different payments for medical costs between outpatients and inpatients were significantly different (χ2 = 24.404, Pâ <â .01). Middle-aged Vietnamese females in Guangxi, China, may have much greater healthcare needs. Their main medical demand is for obstetric services. Measurements should be taken to improve the health services targeting Vietnamese female, but the legitimacy of Vietnamese in Guangxi is a major prerequisite for them to access more and better healthcare services.
Asunto(s)
Emigración e Inmigración , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Seguro de Salud , Obstetricia , Pueblos del Sudeste Asiático , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , China/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pueblos del Sudeste Asiático/etnología , Pueblos del Sudeste Asiático/estadística & datos numéricos , Vietnam/etnología , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/economía , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Migrantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Emigración e Inmigración/estadística & datos numéricos , Obstetricia/economía , Obstetricia/estadística & datos numéricos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To quantify variation in the association between episiotomy and obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) by maternity care provider in spontaneous and operative vaginal deliveries (SVDs and OVDs). METHODS: Population-based retrospective cohort study of vaginal, term deliveries among nullipara in Canada (2004-2015). Adjusted rate ratios (ARRs) and 95% CIs were estimated using log-binomial regression to quantify the associations between episiotomy and OASI, stratified by care provider (obstetrician [OB], family physician [FP], or registered midwife [RM]) while adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: The study included 631 642 deliveries. Episiotomy use varied by provider: among SVDs, the episiotomy rate was 19.6%, 14.4%, and 8.4% in the OB, FP, and RM groups, respectively. The rate of OASI was higher among SVDs with versus without episiotomy (5.8% vs 4.6%). Conversely, OASI occurred less frequently in operative vaginal deliveries with episiotomy (15.3%) compared with those without (16.7%). In all provider groups, the ARR for OASI was increased with episiotomy in SVD and decreased with episiotomy with forceps delivery. No differences in these associations were observed by provider except among vacuum delivery (ARR with episiotomy vs. without, OB: 0.88, 95% CI 0.84-0.92; FP: 0.89, 95% CI 0.83-0.96, RM: 1.22, 95% CI 1.02-1.48). CONCLUSIONS: In nullipara, irrespective of maternity care provider, there is a positive association between episiotomy and OASI among SVDs and an inverse association between episiotomy and deliveries with forceps. The relationship between episiotomy and OASI is modified by maternity care providers among vacuum deliveries.
Asunto(s)
Canal Anal , Episiotomía , Paridad , Humanos , Episiotomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Episiotomía/efectos adversos , Femenino , Canal Anal/lesiones , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto , Canadá/epidemiología , Obstetricia/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto/epidemiología , Adulto Joven , Partería/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos de Familia/estadística & datos numéricos , Parto Obstétrico/efectos adversos , Parto Obstétrico/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To study the impact of converting from subscription-based publishing to open access ("flipping") in three obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) journals. METHODS: We compared original articles in three OBGYN journals during a matched subscription-based and open access publishing period. We analyzed citation metrics and country of authorship. RESULTS: Overall, 1522 studies were included; of those, 869 (57.1%) were before flipping and 653 (42.9%) were after flipping. There was a decrease in publications by lower-middle income countries from 7.7% in subscription-based publishing to 1.8% in open access (P < 0.001). There was a decrease in the proportion of articles from South Asia (2.5% vs 0.5%), North America (14.4% vs 9.4%), and the Middle East (7.4% vs 2.5%), and an increase in publications from East Asia and Pacific (17.4% vs 30.9%; P < 0.001). The relative citation ratio was higher in the open access period (median 1.65 vs 0.95, P < 0.001). The number of citations per year was higher in the open access period (median 3.0 vs 2.0, P < 0.001). There was an increase in the proportion of funded studies (from 40.2% to 47.8%; P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Flipping to open access in OBGYN journals is associated with a citation advantage with major authorship changes, leading to inequity.
Asunto(s)
Ginecología , Obstetricia , Publicación de Acceso Abierto , Publicaciones Periódicas como Asunto , Obstetricia/estadística & datos numéricos , Ginecología/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Publicaciones Periódicas como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Publicación de Acceso Abierto/estadística & datos numéricos , Bibliometría , Factor de Impacto de la Revista , Autoria , Acceso a la Información , Edición/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Gender and racial diversity in academic Canadian departments of obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) have not been previously described. We examined gender representation in leadership in academic OBGYN departments and gynecologic oncology (GO) divisions, and determined factors predictive of leadership and promotion including racialized status. METHODS: This cross-sectional study of Canadian residency-affiliated academic OBGYN departments queried institutional websites in January 2021 to compile a list of academic faculty. Subjective gender was assessed using photographs and pronouns, and racialized status was determined using photographs. Logistic regression analyses determined predictive factors for leadership roles. Fassiotto et al. rank equity indices (REI) and Hofler et al. representation ratios were calculated. RESULTS: Within 16 Canadian institutions there were 354 (33.6%) men and 699 (66.4%) women, with 18.3% racialized faculty. Men were more likely to reach full professorship (P < 0.00001) and leadership positions of department chair, vice-chair or division head (P = 0.01). Representation ratios for women in OBGYN were <1 for all administrative leadership positions, and pairwise comparisons of the probability of promotion for women OBGYNs using REI reveal significant disparities between senior and junior administrative leadership and professorial ranks. Racialized physicians were less likely to have attained full professorship (P = 0.002). Ninety-seven academic GOs were identified: 68 (70.1%) were women, 17 (17.5%) racialized. Seven GO divisions (44%) had no racialized members. On multivariate analysis, only year of completion of fellowship was predictive of leadership. CONCLUSION: In academic Canadian OBGYN departments women are underrepresented in leadership and full professor positions. Racialized faculty are underrepresented in full professorship.
Asunto(s)
Ginecología , Liderazgo , Obstetricia , Humanos , Canadá , Femenino , Masculino , Estudios Transversales , Ginecología/estadística & datos numéricos , Obstetricia/estadística & datos numéricos , Docentes Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Diversidad Cultural , Oncología Médica/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
A incidência de trauma durante a gestação é de 6% a 8% (formas graves de trauma: 3%-6%). Das gestantes que necessitam de internação por causa de um trauma, 60% evoluem para o parto. As gestantes têm 1,6 vez mais chances de morrer numa situação de trauma. As alterações anatômicas e fisiológicas da gestação interferem nas repercussões e na abordagem do trauma. A violência doméstica representa o mecanismo mais comum de trauma para a gestante e desencadeia várias complicações obstétricas, devendo ser, idealmente, identificada no pré-natal. No acidente automobilístico, atenção especial deve ser dada ao diagnóstico de descolamento prematuro de placenta (DPP). O ultrassom na sala de trauma possibilita ação na assistência ao trauma e também, como mecanismo rápido, informações necessárias sobre o feto e a gestação (FAST fetal). A maioria dos exames de imagem necessários para a boa assistência ao trauma não representa agravos à gestação. O pré-natal tem papel importante na prevenção dos traumas na gestação. A ação conjunta do cirurgião do trauma e do obstetra é recomendada no atendimento da gestante traumatizada, principalmente nos casos graves e em gestantes acima de 20-24 semanas
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Embarazo , Obstetricia/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Prenatal , Ultrasonido/instrumentación , Accidentes de Tránsito/prevención & control , Violencia Doméstica/estadística & datos numéricos , Desarrollo Fetal , Desprendimiento Prematuro de la Placenta/prevención & control , Muerte Materna/prevención & controlRESUMEN
This Medical News article discusses how the overturning of Roe v Wade will change training for future obstetrician-gynecologists in states where abortion is banned or severely restricted.
Asunto(s)
Aborto Legal , Competencia Clínica , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina , Ginecología , Obstetricia , Decisiones de la Corte Suprema , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Aborto Legal/legislación & jurisprudencia , Aborto Legal/normas , Aborto Legal/estadística & datos numéricos , Ginecología/educación , Ginecología/normas , Ginecología/estadística & datos numéricos , Obstetricia/educación , Obstetricia/normas , Obstetricia/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/normas , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Competencia Clínica/legislación & jurisprudencia , Competencia Clínica/normas , Competencia Clínica/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Intra-Uterine Device (IUD) insertion is possible in early postpartum. Although this contraception method is recognized and used in lots of country, it seems infrequent and poorly known in France. Our study aims to assess the barriers to the application of this method in France. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to obstetricians-gynaecologist professionals and midwives in France, through the affiliation to CNGOF (French National College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists) and to CNSF (French National College of Midwives). Questions were focused on the practices and knowledge about the insertion of IUD in early postpartum. RESULTS: four hundred eight practitioners responded. Amongst them, 63% knew about the possibility to use IUDs after a vaginal delivery and 31% knew it could be inserted during cesarean section. Ten percent of them used this method. Most of these practitioners (80% of them) would like to discuss the insertion of an IUD in early postpartum with their patients and 71% would like to perform the insertion themselves after training. Besides, this study shows that contraception is rarely addressed by physicians during the follow-up of pregnancies. Less than 15% of respondents report discussing the topic systematically with the patient during the pregnancy follow during pregnancy follow. CONCLUSION: insertion of IUDs in early postpartum is uncommon in France. The main limitation seems to be a lack of knowledge, but practitioners seem to be interested in this practice. Training courses could be created in order to rase up the adoption of this practice.
Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica/normas , Dispositivos Intrauterinos , Obstetricia/normas , Adulto , Competencia Clínica/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Francia , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obstetricia/métodos , Obstetricia/estadística & datos numéricos , Periodo Posparto , Embarazo , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
This study had two aims: (1) to explore the types and incidence of obstetric violence (OV) in a group of Italian women, as well as associated socio-demographic factors; and (2) to assess whether OV affects women's mental health (e.g. psychological distress and post-traumatic stress). A web-based cross-sectional study was conducted with 282 Italian women. Women answered questions on socio-demographic factors, childbirth characteristics, OV and mental health. Multiple linear regression analyses assessing the predictive role of socio-demographic and childbirth characteristics on OV were conducted. Additionally, hierarchical multiple linear regression analyses assessing whether OV affected women's mental health were also carried out. More than three quarters of the sample (78.4%) had experienced at least one type of OV (55.5% of non-consented care and 66.4% of abuse and violence). The factors most associated with OV were younger age, low educational level, not having attended a prenatal childbirth preparedness course, and having given birth naturally. The form of OV that most affected women's mental health was that linked to abuse and violence rather than non-consented care. Study findings shed light into addressing OV from a multidimensional perspective.
Asunto(s)
Parto Obstétrico , Salud Mental , Parto , Embarazo , Violencia , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo/psicología , Embarazo/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Parto Obstétrico/psicología , Parto Obstétrico/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Parto/psicología , Violencia/psicología , Violencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Italia/epidemiología , Salud de la Mujer/estadística & datos numéricos , Obstetricia/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
Importance: Timely access to clinically appropriate obstetric services is critical to the provision of high-quality perinatal care. Objective: To examine the geographic distribution, proximity, and urban adjacency of US obstetric hospitals by annual birth volume. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective population-based cohort study identified US hospitals with obstetric services using the American Hospital Association (AHA) Annual Survey of Hospitals and Centers for Medicare & Medicaid provider of services data from 2010 to 2018. Obstetric hospitals with 10 or more births per year were included in the study. Data analysis was performed from November 6, 2020, to April 5, 2021. Exposure: Hospital birth volume, defined by annual birth volume categories of 10 to 500, 501 to 1000, 1001 to 2000, and more than 2000 births. Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcomes assessed by birth volume category were percentage of births (from annual AHA data), number of hospitals, geographic distribution of hospitals among states, proximity between obstetric hospitals, and urban adjacency defined by urban influence codes, which classify counties by population size and adjacency to a metropolitan area. Results: The study included 26â¯900 hospital-years of data from 3207 distinct US hospitals with obstetric services, reflecting 34â¯054â¯951 associated births. Most infants (19â¯327â¯487 [56.8%]) were born in hospitals with more than 2000 births/y, and 2â¯528â¯259 (7.4%) were born in low-volume (10-500 births/y) hospitals. More than one-third of obstetric hospitals (37.4%; 10 064 hospital-years) were low volume. A total of 46 states had obstetric hospitals in all volume categories. Among low-volume hospitals, 18.9% (1904 hospital-years) were not within 30 miles of any other obstetric hospital and 23.9% (2400 hospital-years) were within 30 miles of a hospital with more than 2000 deliveries/y. Isolated hospitals (those without another obstetric hospital within 30 miles) were more frequently low volume, with 58.4% (1112 hospital-years) located in noncore rural areas. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, marked variations were found in birth volume, geographic distribution, proximity, and urban adjacency among US obstetric hospitals from 2010 to 2018. The findings related to geographic isolation and rural-urban distribution of low-volume obstetric hospitals suggest the need to balance proximity with volume to optimize effective referral and access to high-quality perinatal care.
Asunto(s)
Tasa de Natalidad/tendencias , Mapeo Geográfico , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Obstetricia/organización & administración , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Hospitales/tendencias , Humanos , Obstetricia/estadística & datos numéricos , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados UnidosAsunto(s)
Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Clampeo del Cordón Umbilical/estadística & datos numéricos , Parto Obstétrico/estadística & datos numéricos , Ginecología/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Obstetricia/estadística & datos numéricos , Prevalencia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de Tiempo , Cordón Umbilical , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Importance: The residency application process is flawed, costly, and distracts from the preparation for residency. Disruptive change is needed to improve the inefficiencies in current selection processes. Objective: To determine interest in an early result acceptance program (ERAP) among stakeholders in obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN), and to estimate its outcome in future application cycles. Design, Setting, and Participants: Surveys of stakeholders in March 2021 queried interest in ERAP across the US. Respondents included OBGYN residency applicants, members of the Association of American Medical Colleges Group on Student Affairs, OBGYN clerkship directors, and residency program directors. Statistical analysis was performed from March to April 2021. Exposures: Respondents completed surveys sent by email from the Association of American Medical Colleges (to OBGYN applicants and members of the Group on Student Affairs), the Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics (to clerkship directors), and the Council on Resident Education in Obstetrics and Gynecology (to program directors). Main Outcomes and Measures: Applicants and program directors indicated their interest in participating in ERAP, and clerkship directors and members of the Group on Student Affairs indicated their likelihood of recommending ERAP using a 5-point Likert scale. Results: Respondents included 879 (34.0%) of 2579 applicants to OBGYN, 143 (50.3%) of 284 residency program directors, 94 (41.8%) of 225 clerkship directors, and 51 (32.9%) of 155 student affairs deans. The majority of respondents reported being either somewhat or extremely likely to participate in ERAP, including 622 applicants (70.7%) and 87 program directors (60.8%). Interest in ERAP was independent of an applicant's reported board scores, medical school type, race, number of applications submitted, or number of interviews completed. Among program directors, those at university programs were more likely to participate. Stakeholders supported a limit of 3 applications for ERAP, to fill 25% to 50% of residency positions. Estimating the outcome of ERAP using these data suggests 26â¯280 to 52â¯560 fewer applications could be submitted in the regular match cycle. Conclusions and Relevance: Stakeholders in the OBGYN application process expressed broad support for the concept of ERAP. The majority of applicants and programs indicated that they would participate, with potentially substantial positive impact on the application process. Careful pilot testing and research regarding implementation are essential to avoid worsening an already dysfunctional application process.
Asunto(s)
Internado y Residencia/normas , Obstetricia/educación , Criterios de Admisión Escolar/estadística & datos numéricos , Participación de los Interesados/psicología , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/métodos , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/normas , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Internado y Residencia/métodos , Internado y Residencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Michigan , Obstetricia/métodos , Obstetricia/estadística & datos numéricos , Investigación Cualitativa , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Estudiantes de Medicina/psicología , Estudiantes de Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Workplace violence is any act of negative behavior that causes, physically and psychologically harm to health professionals face in the workplace. The prevalence of workplace violence becomes a challenging occupational issue with increasing nature worldwide. In spite of the seriousness and the impact of the problem, little is known about its magnitude and determinants in the study area and even in Ethiopia. OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to assess the magnitude of workplace violence and its associated factors among health care providers working for the last one year at Obstetrics and gynecology department in Amhara Regional State Referral Hospitals, Ethiopia 2019. METHODS: Institutional based cross-sectional study was conducted from October 1st to 30th, 2019. 503 study participants were incorporated in the study. A pre-tested structured questionnaire was used to collect the data. Data were entered into EPI info version 7.2.3.1 and analyzed using SPSS version 23. Binary Logistic regression model was fitted to identify factors associated with workplace violence considering the association to be significant p- value <0.05. RESULT: This study revealed that 44.5%of the health care providers had reported workplace violence (95% CI: 40.2-48.7). Of this majority of the Victims were experienced a verbal type of violence 200 (88.1%), followed by physical 14 (6.2%), sexual 11 (4.8%), and racial two (0.8%). Factors of workplace violence in this research with statically significant, were: working in labor ward (AOR = 7.4,95% CI: 2.9-18.7), Female sex of participant (AOR = 2.4, 95% CI:1.4-4), work experience less than 5 years(AOR 8.5, 95%CI:7.3-33.3) and numbers of staff less than5 in a shift (AOR = 5.3 95% CI:3.8-39.8) and 5-10 staff in a shift (AOR = 3.3, 95% CI:2.7-25). CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The prevalence of workplace violence among obstetrics and gynecology department health professionals in Amhara regional state referral hospitals was high. Developing an incident resolution protocol and legislations to encourage health professionals to prompt report violent acts and judicial punishment of perpetrators will be useful to combat workplace violence at obstetrics and gynecology department.